Read on this page some of the last news received by the PEC from other concerned organizations (PEC members, RSF, IFJ, IFEX, INSI, CPJ, IPI, UPF, UNESCO, UN, OSCE, Freedom House, Article 19, MADA, JED) - in connection with PEC activities - Direct LINKS on our page CONTACT- for PEC statements, please click (left) on PEC NEWS - Notice: the views expressed in this page do not necessarily represent the views of the PEC
***24.05.2012. SOMALIA. NUSOJ is grieved by the Senseless Murder of Radio Journalist in Mogadishu.
National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is outraged and grieved by the increasing attacks against the journalists in Somalia, following the brutal murder of Radio journalist in Mogadishu on Wednesday 24, may 2012, around 1:25 PM local time.
Four unknown assailants armed with pistols shot to death Ahmed Addow Anshur, a producer and reporter for the Mogadishu based Radio Shabelle. The journalist died instantly with bullets hit on the head and the chest and the killers immediately escaped from the scene according to the witnesses at market.
The incident took place near the home of the journalist at Suuq (Market) Bo’le in Dharkenley District of Mogadishu, an area controlled by the Transitional Federal Government (TFG).
It is not yet known the motive behind the killing. The body of the victim has now taken to the family’ house and laid there until his burial is arranged.
This is the latest of string of attacks against journalists and media workers meant to undermine the media freedom and the freedom of expression, says NUSOJ.
“The death of Ahmed Addow Anshur is a great loss, a savage and inhuman act. We strongly condemn this barbaric attack,” says, Burhan Ahmed Dahir, the President of the Supreme Council of NUSOJ. “On behalf of NUSOJ, I send my sincere condolences to the bereaved families and friends of Mr. Anshur and ask Allah to rest his soul in paradise”.
“The mounting attacks against the media professionals in Somalia are a source of dire concern. Journalists play a vital role for informing, educating and preparing the community to enable the society to take informed decisions. There can be no political or religious reason for attaking these media people,” added Mr Dahir.
The National Union of Somali journalists (NUSOJ) calls on the authority of Transitional Federal Government of Somalia to take prompt and public to safeguard the journalists and thoroughly investigate the crime to bring justice those responsible for these murders to prevent further killings.
Late Ahmed Addow Anshur is the sixth journalist and media workers murdered in Somalia in 2012 alone in the hands of the criminals in Somalia. He survived a wife.
It is being planned to bury the body in this Wednesday afternoon at Jazeera cemeteries in Southern suburbs of Mogadishu according to the victim’s family members.
In Somalia, where the violent attacks were raging over the past two decades, journalists and the media houses were under insistent attacks. A significant number of journalists where killed, injures, arrested, as media houses were censored, suspended, or physically raided as well.
***24.05.2012. DOHA FORUM - Journalists’ Safety Is Back on Top of World Community’s Agenda, Says IFJ
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) made a crucial contribution to a debate on safety of journalists at the 12th Doha Forum which closed yesterday.
Bringing together over 600 international participants, including a Representative of the PRESS EMBLEM CAMPAIGN (PEC) (Red), political leaders, decisions makers, academics, media figures as well as representatives of civil society and regional and international organisations, the Forum held a two-day debate focussing on the Arab Spring and the global financial and economic risis.
One of its major sessions led by IFJ president Jim Boumelha and the General Secretary of the National Union of the Philippines, Nestor Burgos Jr, built on the momentum created last January by an international conference for the protection of journalists in dangerous situation also held in Doha.
“The Forum presented the IFJ with an important opportunity to highlight before an audience of world agencies and governments the vital issues concerning safety of journalists and the urgency for strengthening national laws to end impunity,” said Boumelha.
Chaired by Dr Ali Bin Smaikh Al-Marry, Chair of the Qatar National Human Rights Committee, the participants reviewed the recommendations made by the last international conference and plans to put safety on the agenda of the UN General Assembly and highlight the obligation of states to provide more coherent and practical measures to combat targeted violence and to eradicate impunity.
Nestor Burgos Jr gave a moving account of the 2009 Maguindanao massacre where 33 journalists were murdered and its impact on journalists in the Philippines. He also provided an update on the trials of the suspects in the massacre and on the campaign waged by the families of killed journalists.
“The Doha Forum’s workshop on the recommendations of the International Conference on the Protection of Journalists is a welcome and significant step in further calling international attention to and action on the unabated murders of media workers in many parts of the world including in the Philippines,” he said.
The recommendations issued by the last Doha conference, organised by the Qatari National Committee for Human Rights, have become a key part of the global campaign to press governments on their responsibility to protect journalists. They emphasise the need to vigorously enforce the existing legal instruments, binding national authorities to prevent and punish violence against journalists and request the UN to develop new strategies to promote states' compliance with their obligations as well as the creation of a special unit in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to follow up media cases. They call for the right of their families to receive compensation as well as the need for donors to link aid assistance to countries' record on media protection. They further request news organisations to provide adequate safety training and all appropriate support, including protection equipment and trauma counsel to their staff.
“These renewed activities have put media protection back on the top agenda of world institutions and the IFJ is now a key player in the global campaign aimed at the UN and its agencies," added Boumelha.
***DOHA FORUM 2012.Journalist protection should be a priority (DCMF)
At the Doha Forum 2012, media experts urged news networks to train journalists in dangerous situations & recognise the importance of new media. By Zainab Sultan (DCMF)
Journalists should undergo hostile environment training, try and record any attacks on them and be ready to handle interrogations if captured. These were some of the recommendations made by media experts at the recently concluded Doha Forum 2012.
Among the topics discussed during the three day event were the role of media post Arab revolutions and the impact of social and electronic media on Arab politics. A workshop was also conducted for journalists to train them on how to protect themselves in hostile situations.
“In 2011, 106 journalists died from 35 countries with Iraq, Pakistan and Mexico topping the list,” said Jim Boumelha, president of the International Federation of Journalists. “This year many journalists have died in Nigeria and Syria.”
According to IFJ, one out of four journalists working in a war or conflict zone is likely to die but two-third of the killers face no trial or punishment.
“In 15 years the global rate of impunity has remained constant and I think impunity is the best tool to assess press freedom,” said Boumelha.
Qatar National Committee for Human Rights organised the International Conference to Protect Journalists in January 2012 and drafted out several recommendations for the UN, local and international governments, news organisations and journalists.
Some of them included recalling the declarations of the UN and Geneva Conventions, creating awareness among journalists about their rights and involving all NGOs to collaborate and evaluate the current status of media in conflict areas and discussing the draft convention to protect journalists in dangerous situations.
Hassan Rachidi, Doha Centre of Media Freedom consultant, called for all organisations to collaborate because “implementation of laws can be achieved based on cooperation not competition.”
Rachidi stressed that “we have to mobilise the management to believe that the protection of journalists is the responsibility of the employer and journalists should have the right to refuse to go to conflict zones.”
Role of new media and its future in the Arab world
At the session on social and electronic media, media gurus explored the impact and future of social media in the Arab world and the role of citizen journalists during the Arab revolutions.
Ben Bradshaw, former Secretary of State, Department of Culture, Media and Sport in UK said that it would be unfair to label the Arab Spring as Facebook or Twitter revolution because “other countries like Yemen and Libya who do not have many internet users were able to carry out a revolution successfully.”
However, Mustafa Sawaq, Director of Al Jazeera News in Doha did not want to undermine the impact of social media as “it gave us a better way to cover the revolution because we were prohibited to enter many countries for coverage.”
But all of this information flow comes with challenges. Sawaq explains that “Al Jazeera receives more than 1,000 videos each day and we need an army of staff to view this material and verify it for us.”
The panellists advised against ignoring the presence of new media and its usage because Arab countries’ media is evolving and the lines between traditional and other forms of journalism are becoming blurred as news networks increasingly rely on citizen journalists.
“Absence of freedom and censorship in totalitarian governments has led to the birth of citizen journalists and we need to note that this is a gift for us,” said Rachidi.
The forum is in its 12th year and the theme this year was democracy, development and free trade in the Middle East and the Arab world. It was attended by 610 delegates from 84 countries.
***17.05.2012. HONDURAS. Alerta del Secretariado Permanente de la Red Latinoamericana y del Caribe para la Democracia (Redlad): Secuestro y asesinato de periodista en Honduras (English below)
El Secretariado Permanente de la Red Latinoamericana y del Caribe para la Democracia (Redlad) lamenta el secuestro y asesinato del periodista hondureño Alfredo Villatoro, conductor del noticiario radial El Matutino en la emisora HRN, por mano criminal.
Villatoro, gran aliado de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil hondureña y director de noticias de la emisora más importante del país, fue secuestrado por criminales el pasado miércoles 9 de mayo. El periodista fue encontrado muerto la noche del martes 15 de mayo, según lo confirmó el Ministro de Seguridad, Pompeyo Bonilla.
Según la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, se contabilizan más de 21 asesinatos de periodistas en menos de 3 años, todos los casos permanecen impunes. Honduras, el país más violento del mundo con más de 87 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes y en donde cada hora y media se contabiliza una nueva muerte violenta.
El Colegio de Periodistas de Honduras (CPH) condenó el secuestro de Villatoro y alertó sobre la pésima situación que vive la libertad de prensa y expresión en el país centroamericano. Igualmente, el Cardenal Óscar Andrés Rodríguez, repudió el hecho delictivo. A su vez, la Asociación de Medios de Comunicación de Honduras (AMCH) exigió al Gobierno del Presidente Porfirio Lobo que "investigue, identifique y castigue" al crimen organizado que ha secuestrado, violentado y asesinado a tantos periodistas en Honduras.
Por ello, el Secretariado Permanente de la Red Latinoamericana y del Caribe para la Democracia, plataforma de impulso a la democracia y el respeto de los derechos humanos, integrada por más de 300 organizaciones de la región. Miembro Oficial del Foro de Sociedad Civil de la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) y Capítulo Regional del Movimiento Mundial por la Democracia (WMD):
· Alerta al gobierno del presidente Porfirio Lobo para que tome cartas en el asunto y no escatime gastos en asegurar el pleno respeto de la libertad de prensa. La violencia en Honduras es una situación alarmante que requiere soluciones concretas y rápidas. · Insta a la comunidad internacional y gobiernos democráticos del mundo a solicitar públicamente el respeto a la libertad de expresión y prensa en Honduras y aumentar los vínculos de cooperación para la ejecución de proyectos encaminados a enfrentar el dilema de violencia generalizada que azota al país. · Urge a los medios de comunicación internacionales, organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil e instituciones defensoras de la libertad de prensa y expresión a manifestarse sobre el hecho y respaldar acciones para una prensa libre en Honduras y el mundo entero. · Se une los gremios de periodistas hondureños, organizaciones sociales y personalidades que reprocharon el secuestro del periodista y han defendido la libertad de prensa. · Se solidariza con los allegados, familiares y compañeros de lo que es otra víctima más de la intolerancia, la violencia y la violación de derechos humanos llevada a cabo por parte el crimen organizado
La libertad de prensa debe ser obligatoriamente respetada y protegida. El tema de la violencia en Honduras es una cuestión que requiere de urgente atención por parte del gobierno hondureño, gobiernos hemisféricos, agencias de cooperación y Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil del mundo entero. ¿Cuántos periodistas más deben morir?
Alert of Permanent Secretariat of Latin American and Caribbean Network for Democracy (Redlad): Murder of journalist in Honduras. May, 2012.
The Permanent Secretariat of Latin American and Caribbean Network for Democracy (Redlad) deplores the murder of journalist Alfredo Villatoro, host of The Morning radio news on the radio station HRN, by criminal hand in Honduras, .
Villatoro, a great ally of the Civil Society Organizations in Honduras and news director of the country's largest radio station, was kidnapped on Wednesday May 9 by criminal hands. The journalist was found dead on Tuesday night May 15, as confirmed by the Minister of Security, Pompey Bonilla.
According to the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras, are accounted for more than 21 murders of journalists in less than 3 years, all cases have gone unpunished. Honduras is the most violent country in the world with more than 87 homicides per 100 000 inhabitants, in Honduras every hour and a half happens one new violent death.
The Journalists Association of Honduras (CPH) condemned the kidnapping of Villatoro and warned about the terrible situation that live freedom of speech and press in the Central American country. Similarly, Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodriguez, condemned the crime. In turn, the Asociación de Medios de Comunicación de Honduras (AMCH) demanded the government of President Porfirio Lobo to "investigate, identify and punish" the organized crime that has kidnapped, raped and murdered so many journalists in Honduras.
Therefore, the Permanent Secretariat of Latin American and Caribbean Network for Democracy, a platform for advancing democracy and respect for human rights, integrated over 300 organizations in the region. Official Member of the Civil Society Forum of the Organization of American States (OAS) and Regional Chapter of the World Movement for Democracy (WMD):
· Warning the government of President Porfirio Lobo to take action on the matter and spare no expense in ensuring full respect for press freedom. Violence in Honduras is an alarming situation that requires specific solutions and fast. · Urges the international community and democratic governments of the world to apply for respect of freedom of speech and press in Honduras and increase cooperation to implement projects to address the dilemma of widespread violence plaguing the country. · Urges the international media, civil society organizations and institutions that defend press freedom and expression that will manifest publicly about the problem and will support actions to get free press in Honduras and the world. · Joining to the Honduran journalists unions, social organizations and personalities who criticized the kidnapping of journalist and have defended freedom of the press. · Give solidarity with the relatives, family and colleagues of who is yet another victim of intolerance, violence and violation of human rights carried out by organized crime.
Press freedom must necessarily be respected and protected. The issue of violence in Honduras is a matter that requires urgent attention by the Honduran government, hemispheric governments, aid agencies and civil society organizations worldwide. How many journalists have to die?
Secretariado Permanente Red Latinoamericana y del Caribe para la Democracia San José, Costa Rica http://www.redlad.org/
***14.05.2012. SYRIA. Eight journalists and bloggers freed, 31 still held (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders welcomes the provisional release of eight journalists and bloggers who were arrested by intelligence officials during a raid on the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression (SCM) in Damascus on 16 February. “The release of these eight news and information activists at the end of last week is a positive sign, but it should not divert attention from the fact they are still facing a court martial and that dozens of other journalists and netizens are still languishing in Syrian jails,” Reporters Without Borders said, reiterating its call for their immediate release. Seven of the eight released – Yara Badr, Razan Ghazzawi, Mayada Khalil, Sana Zetani, Joan Farsso, Bassam Al-Ahmed and Ayham Ghazzoul – are SCM members. The eighth, Hanadi Zahlout, was visiting the centre at the time of the raid. They are all due to appear before a military court on 29 May on a charge of “possessing prohibited documents with a view to distributing them,” which carries a maximum five-year jail sentence. Five of the eight who are women – Badr, Ghazzawi, Khalil, Zetani and Zahlout – were released three days after the raid but were rearrested when they first appeared before the military court in Damascus on 22 April. The other three – Farsso, Ahmed and Ghazzoul – had remained in detention but were brought before the military court at the same time as the five women on 22 April. They spent at least part of their time in detention in solitary confinement. Five other SCM members who were also arrested during the 16 February raid – Hussein Gharir, Hani Zetani, Mansour Al-Omari, Abdel Rahman Hamada and SCM president Mazen Darwish – have been held apart from the others and have not as yet been brought before any court. Human rights lawyer Anwar Al-Bonni told Agence France-Presse during the weekend that he had received word that they might in poor health. The judge handling the case of the other eight has ordered that that Darwish appear as a witness at the 29 May hearing. According to a Reporters Without Borders tally, at least 31 professional journalists, citizen journalists and cyber-activists are currently detained by the Syrian authorities.
12.05.2012 - Two Turkish journalists released but more than 37 Syrian journalists still held Reporters Without Borders is relieved to learn that two Turkish journalists who were captured while making a documentary in northwestern Syria two months ago were released today. Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu said the Iranian government acted as mediator in their release. Adem Özköse, a reporter for the magazine Gerçek Hayat and the daily Milat, and cameraman Hamit Coşkun were abducted by a pro-government militia near the northwestern city of Idleb on 10 March and were handed over to a government intelligence agency. IHH, a Turkish Islamist humanitarian NGO, announced on 5 May that it had managed to visit the two detained journalists in Damascus. Turgut Alp Boyraz, the head of foreign news at Milat, said they were able to telephone their families on 5 May for the first time since their capture. Announcing their release, the Turkish foreign minister said: “We expect that they will arrive in Tehran shortly. At our prime minister’s request, we have sent a plane to Iran to bring back journalists.” They are expected to arrive in Turkey this evening or tomorrow, the Turkish news agency Anatolia reported. Reporters Without Borders said: “Their release is a big relief but more than 37 journalists and citizen journalists are still detained in Syria. We must not forget them.”
***14.05.2012. MEXICO. Mexico: international and regional experts urge swift action to protect human rights defenders and journalists
GENEVA / WASHINGTON D.C. (14 May 2012) – “The killings and threats repeatedly suffered by rights defenders and journalists in Mexico must stop immediately,” urged a group of four experts from the United Nations and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, calling on the Government to move ahead with the swift promulgation and effective implementation of the ‘Law for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists’.
Highlighting the immediacy of the threats facing defenders and journalists, the experts also urged the Government to implement existing protection mechanisms as a matter of urgency, in order to avoid further attacks and loss of life and to complement the new provisions when they come into effect.
The Bill, which has been approved by both chambers of the Federal Congress, seeks to guarantee and safeguard the life, integrity and security of human rights defenders and journalists by creating a mechanism with the authority to implement measures to protect those at risk, as well as at preventing such risks from arising in the future.
“Human rights defenders in Mexico desperately need the State’s effective protection now,” said Margaret Sekaggya, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders. “They continue to suffer killings, attacks, harassment, threats, stigmatization and other serious human rights violations.”
“The State has to implement, as a matter of priority, a global protection policy for human rights defenders. The lack of appropriate and effective systems for implementing specialized protection measures are related to the situation of defenselessness in which many human rights defenders find themselves, which has caused the death of many of them in recent years,” stressed Santiago A. Canton, the Executive Secretary of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on behalf of the Rapporteurship of Human Rights Defenders*.
“We have to break the cycle of impunity in Mexico, which is becoming an increasingly violent place for journalists,” said Frank La Rue, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. “The recent killing of four press workers in Veracruz underscores the dire need for concrete steps to be taken to guarantee the safety of journalists and put an end to impunity.”
Catalina Botero, Special Rapporteur for freedom of expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, stressed that “safeguarding journalists and human rights defenders is not only compatible with the fight against crime, it is an essential element of this struggle. The Mexican authorities should take immediate measures to protect those journalists and human rights defenders that are being threatened, as well as to make definitive advances in the struggle against impunity for the crimes that have been committed against them.”
The four experts commended the Federal Congress for approving the Bill, pointing out that it would provide added impetus and sustainability to existing protection frameworks, while also strengthening these frameworks.
The Bill was drafted in consultation with civil society organizations, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Mexico provided technical advice throughout the drafting process.
The human rights experts praised the consultative process which allowed multiple stakeholders to play an important role in the drafting of the Bill, and called for the same participatory approach throughout the implementation process. However, they emphasized the urgency of providing effective protection to those at risk and ensuring that human rights violations against journalists and human rights defenders do not go unpunished.
(*) In keeping with Article 17(2)(a) of the Commission’s Rules of Procedure, Commissioner José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez, of Mexican nationality, does not participate in matters concerning said country. ENDS
***30.04.2012. Clombia - Todavía se desconoce paradero de corresponsal francés Roméo Langlois (FLIP)
La Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa – FLIP, manifiesta su preocupación por la situación del periodista francés Roméo Langlois, quien está desaparecido luego de encontrarse atrapado en medio de combates entre el Ejército colombiano y la guerrilla de las Farc, en las selvas del departamento de Caquetá, al sur oriente del país.
La FLIP hace un llamado para que se maneje con mayor prudencia la información sobre lo sucedido. Cualquier especulación e información no confirmada sobre los hechos y el paradero actual del reportero, pueden ponerlo aún más en riesgo. La FLIP espera que pronto se puedan tener noticias favorables sobre las condiciones de Roméo Langlois.
Lo sucedido
El sábado 28 de abril, el periodista Langlois, corresponsal de la cadena de televisión France 24 y el diario Le Figaro, acompañó una operación de militares y policías contra laboratorios de coca custodiados por las Farc en las selvas de Caquetá, como parte de la realización de un documental sobre el narcotráfico en Colombia.
Durante el operativo, el grupo cayó en una emboscada del Frente 15 de las Farc, lo cual inició los enfrentamientos militares. El periodista quedó entre el fuego cruzado.
El domingo el Ministro de Defensa, Juan Carlos Pinzón, señaló que, de acuerdo a información dada por los soldados, durante el combate el periodista, que portaba chaleco antibalas y casco blindado, quedó herido en un brazo. “En medio de la tensión seguramente tomó la decisión de quitarse el chaleco y el casco militar, y manifestar que era de la población civil para desplazarse al área desde donde disparaban los guerrilleros”, explicó.
Por su parte, el Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de Francia, Alain Juppé, anunció ayer que el reportero había sido secuestrado por el grupo guerrillero. Sin embargo, en las últimas horas precisó que “no hay certeza absoluta” de que Langlois haya sido plagiado.
El gobierno colombiano dice no saber dónde se encuentra el periodista y hasta el momento las Farc no se han pronunciado sobre el tema.
Simone Bruno, periodista que trabaja en el documental junto con Langlois, pero que no fue al operativo, viajó a Caquetá junto con otros periodistas internacionales para tener mayor claridad sobre lo sucedido. "Hay muchos comentarios y rumores sobre su situación pero son simples rumores”, dijo Bruno.
Hasta el momento lo único cierto es que Langlois se encuentra desaparecido y se desconoce su estado de salud.
Roméo Langlois es un corresponsal con amplia experiencia en el cubrimiento del conflicto en Colombia y ha hecho varios reportajes sobre el tema.
Periodismo y conflicto
El Caquetá ha sido históricamente uno de los departamento más afectados por el conflicto armado colombiano. Para las Farc es un territorio estratégico para el cultivo y producción de coca, así como para la confrontación contra el Estado. En ese departamento el Ejército cuenta con la Brigada XII y dos birgadas móviles más.
El trabajo periodístico es fundamental para infomrar y comprender el conflicto en Colombia. La situación de Roméo Langlois, demuestra, una vez más, las difíciles condiciones y el peligro que representa para el periodismo cubrir temas relacionados con el conflicto armado.
***27.04.2012. Brazil. UN alarmed by another journalist killed in Brazil - statement by Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: Rupert Colville
We are alarmed that yet another journalist has been killed in Brazil, bringing to at least four the number of journalists murdered in the country so far this year. Décio Sá, an investigative journalist reporting on local politics, corruption and organized crime, was gunned down in a bar on Monday, 23 April. We condemn his murder and are concerned at what appears to be a disturbing trend of killing journalists that is damaging the exercise of freedom of expression in Brazil. We have long been concerned about the need for Brazilian human rights defenders, including journalists, to be able to conduct their work without fear of intimidation or worse.
We welcome the fact that state authorities have committed to conducting a thorough investigation and call for this and other similar cases to be treated as a major priority so that perpetrators are not emboldened by the prevailing lack of accountability for such crimes. At the same time, we urge the Government to immediately implement protection measures to prevent any more such incidents.
A bill introduced into Congress in 2011, ordering police investigations into crimes against journalists to be conducted at a Federal level, would be a step in the right direction. We hope this and other measures to protect journalists will be adopted as a matter of some urgency.
***24.04.2012. UN approves common strategy on safety of journalists The UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity, led by UNESCO, was endorsed on 13 April 2012 by the UN Chief Executives Board, the highest level coordination mechanism of the UN system. The Plan of Action aims toward the creation of a free and safe environment for journalists and media workers in both conflict and non-conflict situations, with a view to strengthening peace, democracy and development worldwide. The Director-General of UNESCO, Irina Bokova, told fellow board members that “the safety of journalists is essential to upholding Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that guarantees the right to freedom of expression.” Over the last decade, more than 500 journalists and media workers have been killed worldwide, with many more wounded or threatened while carrying out their professional responsibilities. In 2011 alone, 62 journalists were killed, according to the latest biennial UNESCO Director-General Report on The Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity, presented in March. In most cases, noted this report, these journalists were not reporting on armed conflict but on local stories, particularly related to corruption and other illegal activities such as organized crime and drugs. In light of these dramatic statistics, there has been a pressing need for the various UN agencies, funds and programmes to develop a single, strategic and harmonized approach in order to have greater impact on combating the issue. The measures in the Plan include the establishment of a coordinated inter-agency mechanism to handle issues related to the safety of journalists, and the involvement of other intergovernmental organizations at international and regional levels to encourage the incorporation of media development programmes focusing on journalists’ safety within their respective strategies. The plan also foresees the extension of work already conducted by UNESCO to prevent crimes against media workers. This includes assisting countries to develop legislation and mechanisms favourable to freedom of expression and information, and by supporting their efforts to implement existing international rules and principles. To further reinforce prevention, the Plan recommends working in cooperation with governments, media houses, professional associations and NGOs to conduct awareness-raising campaigns on a wide range of issues such as existing international instruments and conventions, the growing dangers posed by emerging threats to media professionals, including non-state actors, as well as various existing practical guides on the safety of journalists. Emphasis is also given to the importance of disseminating good practices on the safety of journalists and how to counteract impunity. Journalism education institutions will also be encouraged to include in their curricula, materials relevant to the safety of journalists and impunity. The UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity is the result of a process that began in 2010 upon request of the Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC).
***23.04.2012. BAHRAIN.IFJ Condemns Media Restrictions in Bahrain ahead of Controversial Grand Prix
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today accused the authorities in Bahrain of deliberately obstructing the work of foreign reporters who sought to cover the anti-government protests ahead of the Formula One race which took place in the country yesterday. Bahrain denied visas to non-sport journalists and arrested those who were working in the country without journalists’ visas.
“This selective approach to media accreditation is arbitrary and totally unacceptable,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “The authorities were only too happy to tout the return of the Grand Prix to Bahrain as a sign that the situation is normal. Yet, they deliberately set out to deny independent media to verify this claim on the ground.”
Reports say that a number of journalists were denied visas to enter the kingdom as the decision by Formula One to stage the race there sparked new anti-governments protests. Last year’s pro-democracy demonstrations marked by violent clashes between demonstrators and security forces led to the cancellation of the motor sport event.
Among journalists who were prevented from entering Bahrain were Financial Times’ Simeon Kerr, Sky News' chief correspondent Stuart Ramsay, Times' journalist Karen Lee, CNN correspondent Amber Lyon, two AP reporters and all Reuters' non-sport correspondents.
The authorities also detained on Sunday Jonathan Miller, reporter of Britain’s Channel 4 News, along with his team for working without accreditation, according to reports. They were released this morning and deported from the country. The news channel said that the team’s local driver was assaulted and separated from the foreign reporters and his whereabouts were unknown.
The IFJ voices concerns over the authorities’ commitment to implementing meaningful changes, including respect for press freedom. The Federation points to the failure of the government to implement in full the recommendations of the Bassiouni report, in particular to review court cases involving journalists as well as reinstating all sacked journalists. The case of France 24’s reporter Nazeeha Saeed has been referred back to the public prosecutor by the High Criminal Court while journalist Reem Khalifa was recently fined BD 600 (around US$ 1600).
“The government’s ongoing resistance to legitimate scrutiny by independent media renders its claim to genuine change less credible,”’ added Beth Costa, IFJ General Secretary. “Unless they match their words with verifiable action and stop interfering in media affairs, their already poor record on democratic rule will soon be beyond repair.”
***19.04.2012. SYRIA. Four citizen journalists killed despite ceasefire (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders has learned of the deaths of four citizen journalists in Syria: Ahmed Abdallah Fakhriyeh shot dead in Dmeir and Samir Shalab Al-Sham Abu Mohamed killed by a shell in Homs, both on 14 April, and Alaa Al-Din Hassan Al-Douri, whose dead body was recovered in Hama province yesterday, and Khaled Mahmoud Kabbisho, summarily executed yesterday in Idlib.
The information we have received about the identities of these four activists and the circumstances of the deaths is difficult to confirm, however.
“Every day the violence in Syria causes dozens of deaths and takes a heavy toll among journalists and citizen journalists,” the press freedom organization said.
“The government disregards its international commitments and shows little sign of ending its brutal crackdown. Information from Syria has become extremely difficult to obtain, to the point where we are unable to confirm with certainty our information about the deaths of the four citizen journalists.”
“We hope that the arrival of international observers will allow the government to end the media isolation it has adopted so that it can pursue its bloody crackdown, and we draw the observers’ attention to this issue.”
Fakhriyeh, 35, was shot dead while he was driving to film the arrival of Syrian army troops in the village of Dmeir, about 40 km northeast of Damascus. He was a member of the local coordinating committee and had been filming events in Syria for the past year.
Al-Sham, 26, was wounded when a mortar round hit the building from which he was recording the shelling of two Homs neighbourhoods by Syrian forces. Residents were unable to go to his aid and he died shortly afterwards. Known by the nickname Abu Layla, he had been covering the Syrian uprising in Syrian for the Syria News Network for more than a year.
Al-Douri, 44, was wounded by a bullet at a roadblock near the ancient ruins of Apamea, about 40 km northwest of Hama. He was held in custody by security forces and his dead body, showing signs of torture, was handed over to his family three days later. A leading rights activist, he had given up his job more than a year ago to devote his time to the revolutionary movement. He was married with two children.
Kabbisho was held for questioning then summarily executed in the town of Idlib in the northwest of the country. His head was reported to have been crushed by a Syrian army tank. The activist, who regularly posted videos of demonstrations in Idlib onhis YouTube channel, was married with three children. His wife is pregnant with their fourth child.
Reporters Without Borders has also learned, again without confirmation, the arrest of Mohamed Al-Hariri two days ago in Deraa. If this turns out to be the case, the worst is feared for this citizen journalist, who appeared on the TV channel Al-Jazeera describing the operations of the Syrian army in the town.
***05.04.2012. SYRIA. SAFETY ADVICE FOR JOURNALISTS (INSI)
LONDON (April 4/INSI) Syria was the most dangerous country for journalists in the first three months of this year, with 10 members of the news media killed there since the start of 2012. As next week's deadline approaches for an internationally brokered ceasefire, the International News Safety Institute urges all journalists to take adequate precautions in what continues to be an extremely dangerous and unpredictable environment for those working in the news media.
The following advice has been collated by INSI for those working in Syria: Share your travel plans with a trustworthy person who would be able to contact the authorities/international pressure groups in the case of an emergency; Consider sharing passwords for your emails in case you are arrested and your accounts are hacked Make sure you are discreet about moving into a building - when you move around during the day don't give away your night-time positions Try to move locations during the night and change locations each day/night Ensure you are not next to an anti Government forces position or any sort of political base Where possible seek out a cellar with reinforced concrete, so you can take cover if they start shelling If no cellar, then try to find a stairwell or an escalator shaft; they are normally made of reinforced concrete Wear your flak jackets and helmets day and night - sleep in them if you feel the need Make sure editors are sending in people with advanced trauma kits, who know how to use them and have the training in advanced life support Think about taking a safety advisor as they can advise on military tactics, weapons systems and ranges of weapons and when to think about moving locations Carry your first aid kit with you at all times, as well as communication equipment (satphone) grab bag, GPS and all emergency kit Think about where, how and when you transmit and receive. Is it absolutely necessary to film or can you send a mobile message back - this is a lot safer (why? because transmissions can be tracked?) Make sure you have an exit plan as well as an emergency escape plan Make sure you are covered by life assurance for this area Make sure the management is clear at what stage they need to pull people out - ask yourself whether the story still worth it? Do not transmit from where you are staying Find a location inside as far away as possible from your living location to transmit - do this with the least amount of people, so if there is a probability that fewer people get hurt Transit in 2 minute bursts and then get off the phone and move location. The Government Forces will find it more difficult to get a location fix Your management should not have a "I have to transmit" policy. If you cannot do the above then you don't file Think about filming at night, they often have less people awake at night and it is more difficult to locate due to the darkness and lack of vision. Still file in 2 minute bursts and move location, but maybe just a few hundreds metres under cover of darkness. Don't hang around in huddles of journalists and consider avoiding news hubs as they attract enemy fire
***31.03.2012. 23 journalists killed in Syria - Doha Center for Media Freedom (DCMF) documents the killing of 23 journalists in Syria as part of government crackdown on anti-regime protests.
Death toll of journalists and citizen journalists killed in Syria since the beginning of the regime campaign to flush out anti-government protests has jumped to 23, according to Doha Centre for Media Freedom (DCMF).
The DCMF has documented the killings based on its sources in Syria, Local Co-ordination Committees, the Homs Revolutionary Council and the Syrian Journalists Association.
Some of the journalists were killed during Syrian army random shelling of some neighbourhoods, while others were killed by snipers or due to torture following their capture.
While the DCMF conveys condolences to the families of all journalists killed in Syria, it expresses shock and sadness at the deaths and pays tribute to the immense courage of all local and foreign reporters covering the events in Syria.
The Centre also condemns in the strongest possible manner the brutal killings of those journalists-- in bold violation of international human rights norms and freedom of expression --- and urges the Syrian authorities to end targeting local and foreign journalists and to guarantee their right to move freely to cover events currently taking place in Syria.
The following is the list of journalists killed in Syria as documented by the DCMF:
Ahmed Daheek, photographer, killed by tank gunship near Homs on 29-5-2011.
Farzat Yahya Jerban, broadcast technician and photographer. He was arrested by the Syrian intelligence service in the small city of Al-Qusayr, near Homs on 19-11-2011. His body was found dumped in the street the following day with clear signs of torture on his body.
Nizar Adnan Humsa, a photographer. He was detained by Syrian intelligence for one month and a half in Al Bayada neighbourhood in Homs. His dead body was handed over to his family on 26/11/2011.
Firas Barshan, a photographer shot and killed by Syrian security in the city of Hama on 07/12/2011.
Hamza Khalid Amer, a photographer. He was killed by an ARPJ rocket while filming the army’s incursion of Shamseen, near Homos on 15-12-2011
Bilal Jibss, a photographer killed by a sniper in Kafr Tkharam, Idlib on 16/12/2011.
Basil Al Sayed, photographer, killed in a random shooting. He filmed the shooting which cost his life in 22-12-2011
Muawiya Ibrahim Ayoub, photographer, killed by security forces while filming their incursion of Rasten neighbourhood near Homs on 28-12-2011
Muatassim al Saleh, broadcast technician, was killed near Hamah in 27-12-2011
Shukri Ahmed Ratib Abu Burghul, Radio presenter, received gunshot wound to the head on 30 December on arriving at his home in the Damascus suburb of Darya after hosting his weekly programme on Radio Damascus. He died of his wound in a Damascus hospital on 2-1-2012.
Usama Burhan Idriss, photographer, killed in a shelling of Inshaatt neighbourhood in Homs on 27-1-2012
Gilles Jacquier, French photographer killed by a rocket or a mortar shell in Homos 0n 11-1-2012
Saleh Samih Murjan, photographer, was killed by sniper fire in Karm Zeitun near Homs on 5-2-2012.
Rami al-Sayed, photographer, killed in an arbitrary bombardment of Baba Amr neighbourhood in Homs on 21-2-2012.
Anas Tarshah, photographer, killed in a random shelling in Homos on 24-2-2012
Abdullah Khaled Awad, photographer, killed in a random shelling of Al-Kusair city near Homs on 24-2-2012.
Amr Kaaka, photographer, killed by the security forces in Doma near Damascus on 9-3-2012
Marie Catherine Colvin American journalist, killed in a shelling of Baba Amr neighbourhood on 22-2-2012.
Rémi Ochlik French photographer, killed in a shelling of Baba Amr neighbourhood on 22-2-2012.
Jawan Mohammed Qatna, Kurdish photographer, was abducted by four men from his home in the town of Derbassiyeh, north of the eastern city of Al-Hassakeh on 25-3-2012. His body, which showed signs of torture, was found three hours later in a nearby village.
Nasim Entriri, Algerian journalist holding British passport, was shot dead by the Syrian army near Azmareen village on Turkish border on 26-3-2012.
Walid Blidi Algerian journalist holding British passport, was shot dead by the Syrian army near Azmareen village on Turkish border on 26-3-2012.
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is outraged over the incident in which two men armed with pistols shot and wounded a radio journalist at the Madina neighborhood of the bigger Wadajir district on Sunday evening around 06:00pm, the latest in a series of attacks against journalists and media workers in recent months.
Two men armed with pistols shot and wounded Mohyadin Hasan Mohamed, "Mohyadin Husni" , who is the head of the News for the Shabelle Media Network,, after returning from his work place on Sunday evening around 06:00pm, 25 March, 2012, according to Mohyadin Hasan Mohamed, "Mohyadin Husni" who spoke with NUSOJ.
"I was passing nearby Mogadishu Cinema in Madina neighborhood of Wadajir district, when two men armed with pistols started shooting at me." Mohyadin Husni told NUSOJ, "Luckily, the first shot slightly penetrated the muscle over the left part of my chest, just close to my heart. But I am feeling good now."
"I escaped with my foot. I am lucky I am alive." Mr. Husni added.
It is not clear the reason behind the attack and no group has yet claimed.
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) strongly condemns the shooting incident which was an apparent assassination attempt and calls for the concerned authorities to investigate the incident immediately without delay.
"Journalists are working in a very difficult circumstances, despite their bravery to continue reporting the news to the Public and risking their lives and it is unfortunate that they are targeted and killed." Mohamed Ibrahim, NUSOJ Secretary General said, "We call for immediate and urgent investigation into the shooting incident and bring the assailants to a court of Justice."
"We Pray our colleague for his immediate and speedy recovery." Mr. Ibrahim added.
On March 4, 2012 Unidentified assailants shot and killed the journalist, Ali Ahmed Abdi, a young journalist in his 24, near Hotel Guhaad, on his way home after returning from his work place on Sunday night around 10:00pm local time in the town of Galkacyo, controlled by the Puntland authorities.
***24.03.2012. SRI LANKA. Alarming Increase in Hostile Rhetoric, Threats of Reprisals Against Journalists in Sri Lanka
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) strongly deplores the alarming escalation in hostile rhetoric and the barely concealed threats of reprisals that have been made against some of the country’s leading journalists and human rights defenders by representatives of the Sri Lankan government and by state-owned media outlets.
This follows the adoption of a resolution by the U.N. Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on March 22, in which the Sri Lankan government was censured for rampant human rights violations during the last phases of the country’s long civil war and urged to initiate urgent measures of reconciliation to ensure a durable peace between the country’s main ethnic groups.
“We observe that state-owned media has in the days since the U.S. made known its intention to table a censure resolution against the Sri Lankan government, been rapidly ramping up the tone of its attacks on the country’s journalists and media freedom defenders,” said the IFJ Asia-Pacific Director Jacqueline Park
On January 26, Dinamina, the Sinhala-language daily from the state-owned Associated Newspapers (or Lake House) group, carried a story quoting senior minister, Keheliya Rambukwella, to the effect that exiled journalists who had taken up the campaign for human rights and reconciliation were “traitors” who were bringing the country into “disrepute.”
Later, the English-language daily from the Lake House group, the Daily News, reported that human rights defenders, including journalist and press freedom campaigner Sunanda Deshapriya, were betraying Sri Lanka and continuing to work with the terrorist rump of the defeated Tamil insurgent group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
In an editorial on March 16, Dinamina described human rights defenders as “degenerates” and denounced Deshapriya as a “mouthpiece of the LTTE”. It warned that in a country like Iran, “ these kinds of bastards would be stoned to death”.
Dharmasiri Lankapeli, one of the veteran leaders of the Federation of Media Employees’ Trade Unions (FMETU) has also been targeted by the state-owned media. The attacks have become particularly harsh since the country’s main professional media associations and journalists’ unions joined hands for a “black January” observance this year, to protest against the continuing climate of impunity for attacks on the right to free speech.
The attacks have also extended to social scientists and political commentators such as P. Saravanamuttu, Nimalka Fernando and Sunila Abeysekara, and prominent figures of the church who have argued the cause of national reconciliation and accountability for human rights abuses since the end of the civil war.
The government-controlled ITN TV channel has been a platform for severe verbal assaults against journalists and human rights defenders. Between January 9 and 24, the channel carried no fewer than five programmes in its daily slot titled “Vimasuma” attacking journalists who had been present during the nineteenth regular session of the UNHRC, for having allegedly “betrayed” the country.
The IFJ learns that vivid and graphic photo-montages have been circulated by various political actors, which represent journalists and other prominent human rights defenders as terrorists and traitors, working at the behest of alien forces.
On March 23, Sri Lanka’s Minister for Public Relations, Mervyn Silva addressed a public demonstration against the UNHRC resolution, threatening to “break the limbs” of any of the exiled journalists if they dared set foot in the country again. Among the journalists mentioned was Poddala Jayantha, who suffered a brutal assault in Colombo city in June 2009 that left him with permanent disabilities, and has lived in exile since January 2010.
Silva has been known for several bruising encounters with the media in recent years and was in July 2009, credibly reported as publicly claiming credit for the murder of newspaper editor Lasantha Wickramatunge in January and the assault on Jayantha in June.
Though he later disavowed the statement attributed to him, Silva’s record as a baiter of journalists committed to human rights and free speech, has continued to cause deep unease.
“We fear that the hostile climate created by the stream of rhetoric from government spokespersons and state-owned media, could engender serious hazards to those who dare to speak up in Sri Lanka for peace and national reconciliation,” said Ms Park.
The dangers are clear and imminent and the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, has issued a public warning against reprisals that target Sri Lanka’s journalists and human rights defenders.
“We call on the top political leadership in Sri Lanka to promptly distance itself from the manner of hostile rhetoric that has been seen and heard over the last three months,, said Ms Park.
“We urge that serious consideration be given to the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission which recently submitted a comprehensive report pointing the way forward for post-conflict Sri Lanka, after being invested with a wide-ranging mandate by the President of the country.”
***13.03.2012. INSI. INSI book sparks lively debate on women journalists in danger zones
The challenges faced by women journalists working in conflict and danger zones around the world were highlighted at the launch of INSI's ground-breaking book 'No Woman's Land: On the Frontlines with Female Reporters'.
A panel of prominent journalists moderated by BBC special correspondent Lyse Doucet, ranged over critical issues raised by some of the 40 female journalists who had written for the book. The platform, at the Thomson Reuters building in London last Thursday also included freelance photographer Kate Brooks, Sky News Head of International News Sarah Whitehead, CNN Presenter Nima Elbagir, Reuters reporter Maria Golovnina and Head of News for BBC World News Andrew Roy.
Introduced by INSI President Chris Cramer, the event began with a silent tribute to 75 female journalists who have died covering the news since 2003, the year the International News Safety Institute was founded. The recent death of Marie Colvin in Syria was a tragic reminder of the dangers of frontline reporting.
CBS correspondent Lara Logan, whose shocking assault in Cairo's Tahrir Square last year inspired the book, wrote the foreword to 'No Woman's Land', a collection of compelling stories describing the risks, the challenges and the emotional and physical impact of danger on newswomen around the globe.
The book also contains safety advice and guidance for all journalists (more on: www.newssafety.org)
***12.03.2012. In honour of World Day against Cyber-Censorship, RSF releases new list of internet enemies (RSF)
(RSF/IFEX) - 12 March 2012 - To mark World Day Against Cyber-Censorship, Reporters Without Borders is today releasing its new list of "Enemies of the Internet" and "countries under surveillance." This report updates the list released in 2011.
Two countries, Bahrain and Belarus, have passed from the "countries under surveillance" to the "Enemies of the Internet" category. Venezuela and Libya have been dropped from the "under surveillance" category while India and Kazakhstan have been added to it.
"The changes in this list reflect recent developments in online freedom of information," Reporters Without Borders said. "Netizens have been at the heart of political changes in the Arab world in 2011. Like journalists, they have tried to resist censorship but have paid a high price.
"Last year will be remembered as one of unprecedented violence against netizens. Five were killed while engaged in reporting activity. Nearly 200 arrests of bloggers and netizens were reported in 2011, a 30 per cent increase on 2010. These unprecedented figures risk being exceeded in 2012 as a result of the indiscriminate violence being used by the Syrian authorities in particular. More than 120 netizens are currently detained.
"On World Day Against Cyber-Censorship, we pay tribute to the ordinary citizens who often risk their lives or their freedom to keep us informed and to ensure that often brutal crackdowns do not take place without the outside world knowing."
Reporters Without Borders added: "As online censorship and content filtering continue to accentuate the Internet's division and digital segregation, solidarity among those who defend a free Internet accessible to all is more essential than ever in order to maintain channels of communication between netizens and to ensure that information continues to circulate."
Social networks and netizens versus filtering and surveillance
The last report, released in March 2011, highlighted the fact that the Internet and online social networks had been conclusively established as tools for organizing protests and circulating information in the course of the Arab world's mass uprisings. In the months that followed, repressive regimes responded with tougher measures to what they regarded as unacceptable attempts to destabilize their authority.
At the same time, supposedly democratic countries continue to set a bad example by yielding to the temptation to put security above other concerns and by adopting disproportionate measures to protect copyright. Technical service providers are under increasing pressure to act as Internet cops. Companies specializing in online surveillance are becoming the new mercenaries in an online arms race. Hactivists are providing technical expertise to netizens trapped by repressive regimes. Diplomats are getting involved. More than ever before, online freedom of expression is now a major foreign and domestic policy issue.
Two new Enemies of the Internet - Bahrain and Belarus
Bahrain and Belarus have joined Burma, China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam in the "Enemies of the Internet" category. These countries combine often drastic content filtering with access restrictions, tracking of cyber-dissidents and online propaganda.
Bahrain offers an example of an effective news blackout based a remarkable array of repressive measures: keeping the international media away, harassing human rights activists, arresting bloggers and netizens (one of whom died in detention), smearing and prosecuting free speech activists, and disrupting communications, especially during major demonstrations.
As Belarus sinks further into political isolation and economic stagnation, President Lukashenko's regime has lashed out at the Internet in response to an attempted "revolution via the social media." The Internet was blocked during a series of "silent protests," the list of inaccessible websites grew longer and some sites were the victims of cyber-attacks. Internet users and bloggers were arrested or invited to "preventive conversations" with the police in a bid to get them to stop demonstrating or covering demonstrations. And Law No. 317-3, which took effect on 6 January 2012, gave the regime additional Internet surveillance and control powers.
***07.03.2012. RUSSIA. IFJ Condemns Media Crackdown in Russia
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and its European group the Federation of European Journalists (EFJ) today joined the Russian affiliate, the Russian Union of Journalists (RUJ), in condemning serious violations of press freedom during the presidential poll held in Russia last week. Media reports say that police in Moscow attacked journalists who were covering the presidential poll and arrested some of them.
“Evidence is emerging of numerous incidents across the country in which police deliberately attacked journalists who were duly accredited to cover the elections, some of whom have also been arrested, ” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “ We condemn this thuggish behavior and we support the call from our members in Russia for an investigation into these acts.”
In a statement, the Russian Union of Journalists said that police in Moscow arrested journalists who were covering protests held on Monday to denounce electoral irregularities during last Sunday presidential poll which was won by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. The Union also accused police of attacking some journalists, including Pavel Nikulin, correspondent of the Moscow News, Andrey Stenin of RIA Novosti, Alexandre Borzenko of Echo of Moscow, Vladimir Romansky, correspondent of TV Dozhd TV and Ilya Barabanov of The New Times.
According to RUJ, police detained journalists despite the fact that they had been shown accreditation documents. The union has also written to the Head of the Investigative Committee in the Office of the Russian General Prosecutor, demanding an investigation in the attacks on media, the statement says.
The IFJ also learned that Igor Taro, the special envoy of the Estonian Public Broadcasting Service (Eesti Rahvusringhääling -ERR) to cover elections in Russia was arrested on 1 March in the Pskov region. He was accused of filming without permission even though he was duly accredited to cover the elections in the country. Police detained and interrogated him for several hours. The reporter later recovered his equipment but had to return to Estonia on 2 March. The Estonian Journalists’ Union, an EFJ/IFJ affiliate, condemned the action of Russian police as” a rude breach of journalistic freedoms “.
The EFJ also backed the RUJ’s call for investigation, saying that the recent attacks signal an aggressive approach the authorities have taken to confront the opposition to President-elect Vladimir Putin.
“We are concerned that the crackdown on journalists we have seen over the last days is a sign of worse things to come,” added EFJ President Arne König. “The authorities give every indication that they plan to suppress independent reporting on the political protests against the new leadership in Russia.”
***05.03.2012. JOURNALISTS REPORTING ON HUMAN RIGHTS NEED GREATER PROTECTION, SAYS UN EXPERT
Recent global events have highlighted the fact that journalists and media workers reporting on human rights issues are particularly vulnerable to threats and attacks, an independent United Nations expert <" http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=11905&LangID=E ">said today, calling for greater protection for those who carry out such vital work.
“Because of the potential impact on society that journalists and media workers can have by disseminating information about human rights through a wide array of media, those individuals are often threatened, wounded and killed in an attempt to silence their voices,” stated Margaret Sekaggya, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders.
“Their work is of extreme importance in holding Governments accountable. However, those same Governments often crack down on them, including through threats, harassment, arrests, detentions, and in the worst of cases killings,” she added in a <" http://www.un.org/Docs/journal/asp/ws.asp?m=A/HRC/19/55">report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, which is currently meeting in Geneva.
Restrictions on media and press freedom, and impunity around violations against journalists and media workers defending human rights can foster a climate of intimidation, stigmatization, violence and self-censorship that can have a chilling effect on their work, according to the expert.
“States should publically recognize the role of these defenders and ensure prompt and impartial investigations and the prosecution of those responsible for violations against them,” she wrote.
Presenting her report to the 47-member Council earlier today, Ms. Sekaggya said the ‘Arab Spring’ helped focus global attention on the extraordinary risks rights defenders face while promoting and protecting human rights in all regions of the world.
She also expressed deep concern that State actors, including Government officials, State security forces and the judiciary, are reportedly the perpetrators of many of the violations committed against these defenders.
“Journalists, environmental, student and youth rights defenders and those working on land issues are in significant need of protection,” she told the Council. “Most of these risks directly affect their physical integrity and that of their family members, but also involve the abusive use of legal frameworks against them and the criminalization of their work.”
The popular protests in countries across the Middle East and North Africa have also shed light on the situation of defenders of youth and student rights. “History shows us that youth and students have played a key role in the promotion of human rights and in placing new ideas on the human rights agenda.
“However, members of youth and student movements are in many cases seen as troublemakers rather than serious actors who can fruitfully contribute to public debate,” she said. “Their voices deserve to be heard, and they should not be threatened as a result of their engagement.”
The expert also highlighted the plight of defenders working on land and environmental issues, such as the impact of extractive industries. In her report, she noted that both State and non-State actors are involved in violations against this group of defenders, and underlines the disturbing number of killings and physical attacks reported to her.
“Human rights defenders have the right to protection, and it is the State’s responsibility to ensure this protection, so that defenders can carry out their important and legitimate work in an enabling environment,” she underscored.
***01.03.2012. SYRIA.International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) - UN Human Rights Council resolution calls for end to impunity for Syrian regime
1 March 2012 - While the human rights and humanitarian situation in Syria is still deteriorating rapidly, the UN Human Rights Council (the Council) this morning concluded an urgent debate on the crisis in the country. The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) commends the decision to convene this debate as both a significant and necessary display of responsibility by the Council.
Following the debate, the body adopted a resolution by an overwhelming margin of thirty-seven votes to three with three abstentions (1). Russia, China and Cuba were the only states to reject the text, and the near-consensus by the rest of the Council in support of the resolution unequivocally shows that the position of these three states is firmly out of step with the international community at large. While the last resolution on Syria adopted by the Council (in December 2011) enjoyed the support of 37 states, this already broad majority was widened still further today, with an unprecedented number of 39 member states standing in favour of the resolution (2). This week's debate marked the fourth major initiative undertaken by the Human Rights Council on Syria in the past nine months, following the three Special Sessions that took place last year, of which the first inaugurated a Commission of Inquiry.
As well as insisting on the importance of ending impunity for those violating human rights in Syria, the Council resolution also “deplores the brutal actions of the Syrian regime over the past 11 months” and calls for it to put an end to human rights violations and attacks against civilians. Furthermore, the resolution also calls for “free and unimpeded access by the United Nations and humanitarian agencies,” which is all the more crucial in light of a reported ground assault on the Bab Amr district of Homs today, as well as yesterday's refusal by the Syrian authorities to allow UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos access to the country (3).
Reacting to the adoption of the resolution, FIDH President Souhayr Belhassen commented that “the text is particularly significant due to its emphasis on accountability, which signals an important evolution in the discourse on Syria at the international level.” Belhassen continued by stating her hope that “the members of the Security Council seize upon the momentum gained in Geneva by referring the Syrian crisis to the International Criminal Court (ICC).” As pointed out by FIDH during its oral intervention, “only when international law is applied consistently and universally does it allow for sustainable peace and democracy to emerge.” As Belhassen noted, “discord in the Security Council has created a wall behind which the Assad regime has been able to act with perceived immunity. This perception will only change when agreement is reached at all levels of the UN system.”
As pointed out in FIDH's oral statement to the Human Rights Council on Thursday, the decision to hold a debate within the Council could not be more timely, with hundreds of people killed over the past month alone and Homs remaining besieged by government forces. This position is confirmed by statistics emerging from the UN this week, which put the death toll in Syria in excess of 7,500 since the start of the uprising a year ago (4). At the opening of the debate, UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay emphasized the gravity of the situation, noting that conditions have significantly worsened in Syria as of late, and called for an end to the killings (5).
In highlighting the importance of a strong follow-up to the debate, FIDH made a series of recommendations and underlined a series of additional themes to the Council. These included the imposition of an arms embargo, the release of political prisoners and the importance of guaranteeing safe and unhindered access for humanitarian organizations. Press contact : Karine Appy + 33 1 43 55 14 12 / + 33 1 43 55 25 18
ENDNOTES :
1) Yes: Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Botswana, Cameroon, Chile, Congo, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Djibouti, Guatemala, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Jordan, Koweit, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Nigeria, Norway, Peru, Poland, Quatar, Republic Moldova, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, United States of America, Uruguay No: China, Cuba, Russian Federation Abstention: Ecuador, India, Philippines. Absent from the room: Angola, Burkina Fasso, Kyrgyzstan, Uganda (Kyrgyzstan and Burkina Fasso later declared they would have voted yes and Angola declared they would have abstained)
2) Bangladesh and Cameroon had abstained in December but voted yes today. Ecuador had voted no in December, but abstained this time.
3) The Syrian authorities have continuously refused to allow the Commission of Inquiry mandated by the Council access to the country.
***23.02.2012. PALESTINE. Violations of Media Freedoms in the oPt during 2011 (Mada)
MADA: 206 Violations of Media Freedoms in Palestine in 2011 - With the Murder of Italian Journalist Vittorio Arrigoni in Gaza Representing the Most Serious Violation of the Year
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) released its annual media freedom violations report for the occupied Palestinian territories in 2011. The report includes documentation of all violations committed against journalists and media freedoms monitored by MADA, in addition to analysis of the most prominent and dangerous types of violations committed in 2011.
MADA identified a total of 206 violations against media freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories during 2011, showing little improvement on 2010, which witnessed a total of 218 violations. Although the numbers show a decrease in the violations compared with 2010, with twelve less violations, they cannot be considered a qualitative improvement in media freedoms considering the seriousness and brutality of a number of the violations that occurred in 2011.
MADA general director Mousa Rimawi stated that the status of media freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories remain tentative because of continued Israeli occupation forces violations against journalists and media freedoms, and ongoing Palestinian security forces violations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Rimawi stressed that without an end to the occupation and the ratification of the Palestinian political reconciliation it is difficult to talk about real improvements in media freedoms.
Rimawi said that the number of Palestinian violations exceeded Israeli occupation violations - by a small margin - for the first time. Palestinian security services committed 106 violations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 2011, marking a significant increase on 2010 which witnessed a total of 79 Palestinian violations, and marked decrease in IOF and settler violations in 2011 with a total count of 100 violations compared with 2010, which saw a total of 139 Israeli occupation violations.
Rimawi, however, stated two important factors in this regard. Firstly, that although the total number of Israeli violations decreased, the violations committed constituted a greater threat to the health and wellbeing of the journalists, who were targeted with, for example, the excessive and inappropriate use of crowd control weaponry such as rubber coated steel bullets, tear gas, concussion grenades and the recently introduced Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), coined “The Scream”. Secondly, that in cases of non-violent abuses, such as restriction of movement, prohibition from travel or prevention from covering an event, many journalists do not report the incident. In addition, it is also important to note the different Palestinian security service trends seen in the two divided Palestinian territories, with 2011 seeing 62 violation in the Gaza Strip and 44 in the West Bank.
MADA also believes that this marked increase in Palestinian security service violations is spurred on by the continuing Palestinian political divisions. Despite the signing of a reconciliation agreement between Fatah and Hamas in 2011, no real steps towards appeasement have been made and there remains a lack in accountability for perpetrators.
The most serious and heinous violation seen in 2011 was the criminal murder of Italian journalist Vittorio Arrigoni by an armed group in Gaza. As a well known long-term solidarity activist and advocate of the Palestinian people, Arrigoni’s murder sent shockwaves through Palestinian society. Before his death, Arrigoni had spent three years living in and reporting from the Gaza Strip, writing articles and raising awareness of the terrible conditions suffered by the people of Gaza as a result of the Israeli blockade and siege. Arrigoni was known throughout the Palestinian territories as a kind man who loved helping anyone anywhere he could, a dedication for which he received Palestinian citizenship in honor of all his efforts.
2011 also witnessed the severe injury of journalist Mohamed Othman who was shot in the chest and hand by Israeli occupation forces on 15 May 2011, while covering a march commemorating the 63rd anniversary of the Nakba. The severity of Othman’s injury, which included paralysis from the waist down, necessitated his transfer to a hospital in Turkey—where he remains today—for specialist treatment. After approximately 10 months of treatment his condition has improved. Othman is now able to walk with the aid of a special device, however, his doctors estimate that it will take a further 2 years for him to be able to walk unassisted.
MADA stressed in its report that Israel’s continued violation of international conventions, particularly article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and their continued assault on freedom of expression in the occupied Palestinian territories has made journalism one of the hardest and most dangerous professions practiced by Palestinians. MADA also denounced the widespread official international silence towards Israeli violations and the lack of any tangible steps taken to reduce the danger faced by journalists in the line of duty.
MADA additionally called upon the concerned Palestinian authorities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to respect the right of freedom of expression and abide by Palestinian Basic Law, particularly article 19, which sanctions this right. MADA also called for an end to the division’s effect on the media, the allowance for all media outlets to work freely and without hindrance, and demanded that all those responsible for attacks on journalists be held accountable.
To read the complete report, please click on the following link:
***21.02.2012. SYRIA. UN experts raise alarm over arbitrary detentions and likely use of torture
GENEVA (21 February 2012) – United Nations independent experts condemned the arrest of at least 16 persons, including prominent Syrian human rights figures, and voiced their concern that the individuals may be subjected to torture and ill treatment. It appears their arrests and detention are directly linked to the activities of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression’s (SCM) in the defence of human rights.
“The Syrian authorities should end all acts of harassment against human rights defenders and release all those arbitrarily arrested and detained,” said the UN Special Rapporteurs on human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya; freedom of expression, Frank La Rue; torture, Juan Méndez; and the Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, El Hadji Malick Sow.
On the afternoon of Thursday, 16 February, security forces raided the offices of the SCM, a prominent human rights organization, which enjoys UN consultative status. All persons present in the centre, including its director, Mazen Darwich, blogger Razan Ghazawi, and at least 14 other persons, were reportedly arrested, blindfolded and taken to Al Jawiya in Mezza airport.
“The arrest of these persons, including prominent human rights defenders, is emblematic of an alarming and recurrent pattern of arbitrary detention in Syria since March 2011. Detention without legal basis should never be used as a method of repression,” independent expert Sow said.
Special Rapporteur Sekaggya underscored that States must ensure that no harm comes either physically or mentally to human rights defenders. “The current situation in Syria does not provide a pretext for Governments to harass and arbitrarily detain human rights defenders,” she said. “On the contrary, they play a crucial role in the protection of human rights in high-risk situations. The Government should work with them, not against them.”
Similar concern was expressed by Special Rapporteur Frank La Rue about the arrests of several people, including human rights activists, bloggers and journalists. “Their role is essential in protecting and promoting human rights in the country,” he stressed. “I am concerned that these arrests and detention are related to the SCM’s work on human rights. If so, these persons should be released immediately and unconditionally.”
“I fear that Mr. Mazen Darwich and other persons arrested may be at serious risk of torture or ill treatment,” said Special Rapporteur Méndez. “I am deeply concerned about their physical and mental well-being particularly in the current context of the ongoing violence in Syria.”
The four UN independent human rights experts called on the Syrian authorities to release the individuals immediately. Their arrest came on the same day as the adoption of a UN General Assembly resolution condemning the violent Government crackdown in Syria.
***29.01.2012. SOMALIA. NUSOJ and Somali Media Fraternity Grieve As They Take Part The Burial Ceremony On Sunday
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) organized the member journalists and Somali media fraternity to gather at Madina hospital on Sunday morning to attend the funeral and show solidarity to our slain colleague who was killed in Mogadishu on Saturday evening, meanwhile the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) welcomes the government’s probe into the killing of the Radio Director.
Late Hasan Osman Abdi (Fantastic), the director of Shabelle Radio, was killed by two unknown assailants armed with pistols, near his home near his home in Nasteeho neighborhood of Wadajir district in Mogadishu on Saturday evening January 28, 2012, according to witnesses.
The gunmen immediately fled from the area, according to Shabelle radio. It is not yet clear the reason behind his killing.He was rushed to Madina Hospital, where he was declared dead, where his body has been kept in the overnight. It is not yet clear the reason behind his killing and no group claimed the responsibility of the attack. NUSOJ officials and Somali media fraternity, some of the Shabelle Radio staff, where Hassan has worked, and family members took the body to a cemetery at Baqdaad village, in the outskirts of Mogadishu, almost 10km Southwest of Mogadishu, where late Hassan Osman Abdi’s burial took place. The burial took place at around 10:00am Sunday morning.
NUSOJ Treasurer, who is also the union’s press freedom coordinator, Abdirashid Abdulle Abikar, spoke to the local and international media soon after the burial ended and extended condolences to the families, friends and colleague of late Hassan. Mr. Abikar also called the journalists and media workers to be vigilant and take safety measures following this murder.
“We pray Almight Allah to remain his soul in Paradise.” Abdirashid Abdulle Abikar, NUSOJ Treasurer and Press Freedom Coordinator said urging that the journalists should take urgent safety measures to ensure their safety in the wake of this horrendous murder.
Mr. Abikar also stressed such killings could only mean to silence the voice of the voiceless and called the journalists to continue their normal work they serve to the public, while he thanked to the journalists in general for their bravery in continuing providing accurate and balanced information to the public in line with the rules and regulations of journalism, which going against such rules could be disastrous and unprofessional, which has nothing to do with journalism.
On Sunday, Somalia government condemned the brutal murder of the radio director pledged urgent investigations into the killing, according to a statement.
Late Hassan Fantastic, 30yrs, is survived by a wife and three children - two girls and a boy and was the third Shabelle director killed since 2007. Three journalists have been killed in Mogadishu last alone Journalists in Somalia who are working in one of the most dangerous environments in the world to be journalists lack the appropriate safety trainings and as well as need their level of professionalism to be upgraded.
***27.01.2012. INSI attends Doha conference on journalist safety
LONDON - The International News Safety Institute welcomes the recommendations of this week's international conference in Doha for the Protection of Journalists in Dangerous Situations as an important contribution to the debate on safety standards. INSI hopes the recommendations will help supplement international frameworks to protect journalists and media staff, and highlight the urgency of improved access to safety training for all journalists around the world. "This international conference is an important part of the safety jigsaw. We are pleased that safety is now forming part of the conversation in the Middle East, which has provided the focus of so many of the major challenges to news crews in the past year. It's vital that the organisers of this conference continue to build on the momentum created here and help make safety a part of the culture in every newsroom throughout the region and beyond," said INSI Deputy Director Hannah Storm, who attended the conference. The conference called on the United Nations and its agencies to work with non-governmental organisations in promoting the issues of journalism safety for all those working in dangerous situations, be they conflict or non-conflict. It urged governments to respect pre-existing conventions and discussions focussed on journalism safety and recommended a strengthening of national laws to end impunity, which means that the majority of those who target journalists never get prosecuted. "By supporting international attempts to raise the awareness of safety issues, we hope this conference can put pressure on those governments which are not yet doing enough to identify and prosecute the killers and attackers of journalists. We hope this will also help persuade news organisations that they have a duty of care to all their news media employees and freelancers - be they reporters, fixers or drivers - and they should provide them with adequate training, equipment and support wherever they are working - be that in areas of conflict, civil unrest, organised crime or disaster zones." The meeting was part of a jigsaw of international conferences aimed at addressing journalist safety issues. UNESCO last September organised a meeting of relevant UN agencies, funds and programmes to design a joint UN strategy on the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity. INSI and other journalist support groups spoke up at the conference, highlighting the issues before an audience of UN and other world agencies and governments. Conclusions drawn from the meeting will be contained in an inter-agency plan of action, due by March, which will formulate a "comprehensive, coherent and action-orientated UN-wide approach". In November, News Xchange 2011, a global convention of broadcasters from around the world, passed a landmark resolution proposed by INSI and the European Broadcasting Union demanding action by world bodies and governments to stop the killing and end impunity. More than 99 per cent of the 440 delegates from 168 media organisations in 56 countries also pledged to research suspicious deaths, creating maximum exposure for each, and report back to News Xchange 2012. Later the same month the Austrian government, working with the International Press Institute, staged a conference of experts from UN agencies, journalist support groups and governments to address means of establishing a more effective international framework for journalist safety. INSI presented the News Xchange resolution to the conference, which concluded with a pledge by Austria to carry the issue forward during its term on the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, to which it was elected earlier this year. Sadly there were far fewer active journalists at the Doha event than there might have been. However, as the sole organisation run by journalists focussing on journalist safety, INSI was able to share its expertise at the conference, and INSI's Hannah Storm was rapporteur for a workshop on safety standards, the conclusions of which will feature separately on the INSI website. It will be a part of a delegation that represents the future activities of the conference. The conference, which was organised by the National Committee for Human Rights in Qatar, was attended by more than 100 delegates from countries as far afield as the Philippines and Pakistan, Mauritania and Mexico, representing media support groups, unions and human rights bodies.
***26.01.2012. PALESTINE. MADA and DCAF hold workshop on access to information in Bethlehem
Ramallah – 26 January 2012: The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) and the Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) held a workshop for journalists on the right of access to information at Maan News Agency headquarters in Bethlehem, on Thursday 24 January 2012.
The workshop – which was conducted over four hours – covered important topics such as the concept of the right of access to information, local legislation ensuring this right - particularly Palestinian draft law - as well as international standards and best practices regarding the right of access to information, relevant international initiatives in this field, and compared them with the Palestinian legal status.
The journalists, who came from various media outlets in Bethlehem, spoke about the most prevalent obstacles facing them in their quest for information and discussed methods for overcoming these obstacles.
MADA and DCAF will hold a series of workshops in the different cities across the West Bank and Gaza Strip to promote journalists’ knowledge about access to information draft law, and to collect their notes and recommendations on this draft law to develop it.
***19.01.2012.SOMALIA - NUSOJ annual report says 2011 even worse for journalists
The annual report of the National Union of Somali Journalists paints a worrying picture of abuses suffered by the media in 2011 and condemns the silence and impunity that surround crimes against journalists.
The report on the state of press freedom, published yesterday, said 2011 was worse than 2010 and lists four journalists killed, seven wounded and 19 arbitrarily arrested, as well as seven attacks on media organizations and at least five prosecutions for criminal defamation.
The organization deplores the fact that journalists were targeted by the authorities and the security forces, and also by militias and individuals. It says attacks were not only politically motivated and systematic but also institutionalized, depriving journalists of the ability to carry out their work without fear.
The report, entitled “Lives and Rights of Journalists Under Threat”, notes an increase in prosecutions of journalists in the semi-autonomous north-eastern region of Puntland and the self-proclaimed state of Somaliland in the north, as a new means of clamping down on the media and restricting the flow of information.
The Mogadishu region, which is in the hands of the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) was the most dangerous part of the country for freedom of information, it said. It was followed by Somaliland, where the number of prosecutions for criminal defamation, slander and false news has escalated.
In third place was Puntland, where there were closures of media organizations, criminal prosecutions and other mistreatment of journalists.
The report says the NUSOJ considers impunity “the foremost, albeit silent, enemy of journalists and press freedom”.
It appeals to the TFG, Somaliland and Puntland authorities:
- To adopt and implement a consistent policy of zero-tolerance for crimes against journalists and media organizations as the only way to ensure reliable practice to respect, protect, defend and promote press freedom.
- To bring police and other security forces under control by immediately stopping the harassment, brutality, arbitrary arrests, and even killing, regularly perpetrated against journalists and media organisations and to ensure full accountability for previous violations.
- To promptly cease violations of journalists’ right to freedom of association and to stop threats of criminal prosecution against journalists, including their organisations and leaders.
The NUSOJ calls on the international community to make their support of, and cooperation with, Somali authorities conditional on respect and protection of the fundamental rights of journalists, and of the people of Somalia in general.
***18.01.2012. TURKEY. Hrant Dink Killing Verdict "Contradictory and Shocking" Says the EFJ
The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), today expressed its surprise at the contradictions in the verdict concerning the murder of Turkish author and journalist Hrant Dink as his colleagues commemorate the fifth anniversary of the killing.
"The Court announced that the premeditated killing of a journalist was not an "organised" crime, while nearly a hundred Turkish journalists are currently in jail charged with organised terroristic activities. We are shocked by such a contradictory verdict" said the President of the EFJ Arne König.
Yesterday the "specially authorised" 14th High Criminal (Penal) Court in Istanbul found Yasin Hayal guilty of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Erhan Tuncel, accused of planning Dink's murder, was not found guilty but was instead sentenced to 10 years and 6 months for his involvement in the bombing of a McDonalds restaurant before Dink's death. The actual gunman, Ogün Samast, was first sentenced to life imprisonment which was then reduced to 22 years and 10 months because he was a minor when he committed the crime.
Astonishingly, the court also ruled that Dink's killing was not an "organised crime": meaning the criminals did not act as an "organised group" but were assumed to have acted in a private capacity. For this reason, Erhan Tuncel is free today, following the normal criminal law procedure, because he had already spent five years in jail prior to the trial.
Tomorrow, the EFJ and some of its affiliates in Europe will commemorate the 5th anniversary of the killing of Hrant Dink, with celebrations or messages to their government in defence of press freedom in Turkey.
Currently 97 journalists are in jail in Turkey and many of them accused of being members of "terrorist organisations". In November 2011 the EFJ led an international mission, in co-operation with other international press freedom groups, with the aim of showing support for the immediate release of all Turkish journalists who appear to have been jailed because of their work. The EFJ President was in Istanbul twice in the past weeks to witness the continuation of the trials.
***16.01.2012. SOMALILAND. IFJ Condemns Crackdown on Media in Somaliland
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the arrest of twenty five journalists in Somaliland recently, accusing the authorities of waging a campaign of intimidation to silence independent reporting.
Reports say that 21 journalists were detained over the weekend by security forces and held in Hargeisa, Borame and Las Anod police stations. They were released today, according to the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ), an IFJ affiliate, but four who had been arrested earlier remain in custody.
"We welcome the release of the journalists but remain concerned by the crackdown on media in Somaliland," said Jim Boumelha, President of the IFJ. "These are wanton acts of intimidation against the journalists and the media in Somaliland. We support the right of journalists to report independently and call for the release of the four colleagues still in detention."
On Saturday, 14 January, police in Somaliland stormed the main headquarters of HornCable TV in the capital town Hargeisa, threw out the staff and sealed off the offices. Two production studios of the television network in Haregisa, which were not in the same building of the headquarters, were also closed down.
According to NUSO, the authorities in Somaliland were angered by the channel's report on a tribal meeting in Taleeh district of Sool region, in which tribal politicians and elders announced the establishment of an autonomous administration". The TV station also reportedly aired views of people criticising Somaliland administration for not preventing this meeting from taking place, reports said.
On Sunday, 15 January, journalists organised a peaceful protest demonstration in front of Somaliland State House. The Presidential guard attacked protesters, beating up journalists and arresting 18 journalists working for HornCable TV. Police also hunted down other journalists who took part in the protest and arrested journalists and media practitioners.
According to NUSOJ, a total of 21 journalists, including 6 female, were arrested over the weekend and detained. They were Mohamud Abdi Jama, editor-in-chief (Waaheen ), Mohamed Omar Abdi, editor-in-chief (Jamhuuriya ), Ahmed Aden Dhere, reporter (Haatuf ), Mohamed Said Harago, head of news (Berberanews), Najah Adan Unaye, director (Hadhwanaagnews), Suhur Barre, reporter (HornCable TV), Abdiqani Abdullahi Ahmed, reporter (Hadhwanaagnews), Mohamed Ahmed Muse, reporter (HornCable TV), Mohamed Fayr , reporter, (Geeska Africa ), Saleban Abdi Ali Kalshaale, reporter (Waaheen), Khalid Hamdi Ahmed, reporter (Waaheen), Nimo Omar Mohmed Sabriye, presenter (HornCable TV), Hamsa Ali Bulbul, reporter (HornCable TV), Mohamed Ahmed Muse Kurase, reporter (HornCable TV), Abdirahman Sheik Yunes, newscaster (HornCable TV), Ayan Diriye, reporter (HornCable TV), Nimo' Diriye, reporter (HornCable TV), Hodan Ali Ajabi, reporter (HornCable TV), Safiya Nuh Sheikh, presenter (HornCable TV), Ahmed Abdirahman Hersi, news editor (HornCable TV), Jama Omar Abdullahi, reporter (Waaheen).
Farhan Haji Ali Ahmed, owner of HornCable TV, was also summoned to report today at the Somali Presidency for questioning but the 21 journalists were released today.
NUSOJ also condemned the arrests and called for the release of the four journalists who are still held.
"The release of these journalists is good news but we also demand the immediate release of four colleagues who have no case to answer," said Omar Faruk Osman, Secretary General of NUSOJ who called for their immediate and unconditional release. "This systematic harassment and intimidation of journalists and media workers by the police and Somaliland security forces must end."
***06.01.2012. PHILIPPINES - THE PERSISTENCE OF IMPUNITY A BAD START FOR THE NEW YEAR Statement of the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ) on the killing of Christopher “Cris” Guarin
THE KILLING of General Santos newspaper publisher and RMN blocktimer Christopher Guarin hardly a week since the new year began is one more indication of the persistence of the culture of impunity that encourages the killing of journalists and media workers in the Philippines.
Unless the necessary steps are taken to speed up the ongoing trials of the accused in the killing of journalists as well as the masterminds , and to investigate, arrest, and try those involved in the killing of Guarin, as well as that of six other journalists in 2011, the killings are likely to continue in 2012 and the coming years.
Among the steps journalists and media advocacy groups including the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ) proposed to the Aquino administration as early as August 2010 are strengthening the Witness Protection Program; rehabilitating the criminal investigation units of law enforcement agencies; organizing multi-sectoral Quick Response Teams; and reviewing the Rules of Court to speed up court trials. None of these proposals have so far been acted upon except that on the Witness Protection Program, the budget of which the government has increased.
The killing of Guarin demonstrates the urgency of the government’s acting on these proposals. FFFJ urges all media advocacy and journalists’ groups to intensify the campaign for government to do so, and calls upon civil society to add its voice to the imperative of punishing the guilty so as to end the culture of impunity that has claimed the lives of 124 journalists and media workers since 1986 to the detriment of the right of the people to information in a democratic regime.
***30.12.2011.IFJ Presses UN for Action on Media Killings after Violence Claims 106 Lives of Journalists and Media Staff in 2011
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today urged the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to take drastic action against governments of the most dangerous countries for media after it published its annual list of 106 journalists and media personnel killed in 2011. The Federation says 2011 has been another bloody year for media and blames governments’ failure to uphold their international obligations for the ongoing violence targeting media. In a letter to the UN Secretary General, the IFJ calls for effective implementation of international legal instruments to combat the prevailing culture of impunity for crimes against journalists.
“It is abundantly clear that deadly violence against journalists is not just a blip due to conflicts around the world but has become a regular cycle in many countries where journalists are hunted down, targeted and murdered by the enemies of press freedom,” said the letter signed by IFJ President, Jim Boumelha. “In a situation where governments are in denial or indifferent to what has become a regular pattern of targeted killings of journalists, it is incumbent upon yourself and the United Nations to remind them of their responsibility to protect journalists.”This year’s list confirms that journalists are among the primary victims of violence in armed conflict, ethnic and religious tensions as well as political upheavals which erupted in many countries during the past twelve months. Media professionals are exposed to serious risks, often with tragic consequences, as they report from the frontline of conflicts such as in Pakistan and the Arab world or crime prevention in the lawless parts of Mexico where they are considered unwelcome witnesses.
The IFJ list of work related media killings is coordinated with the International News Safety Institute (INSI) and contains 106 journalists and media personnel who died during 2011, up from 94 killings recorded in 2010. An additional 20 journalists and collaborators also died in accidents and natural disasters incidents.
The IFJ says that violence targets not just journalists but also colleagues from all sectors of the industry, including cameramen, drivers and fixers and other support staff which are all recorded to underscore their crucial role in news gathering and reporting.
The systematic failure of governments to protect journalists and punish those who are responsible for violence against them has entrenched the culture of impunity in most parts of the world and contributed to ever rising numbers of journalists’ killings. This prompted the IFJ and the press freedom community to hold for the first time the International Day against Impunity for Crimes against journalists on 23 November 2011.
"This year’s numbers just prove that violence targeting media workers continues unabated,” added Stephen Pearse, IFJ Deputy General Secretary. “We need to send out a strong message that action is needed to stop the violence and the bloodshed.”
As of 31 December, the IFJ recorded the following information on killings of journalists and media staff in 2011:
Targeted killings and homicides incidents : 106 Accidental deaths : 20 Total Deaths : 126
The deadliest region in 2011 was the Middle East and Arab World with 32 journalists and media personnel killed. Iraq had the region's highest death toll with 11 dead.
Among countries with high numbers of media fatalities are:
Iraq 11 Pakistan 11 Mexico 11 The Philippines 6 Libya 6 Yemen 6 Honduras 5 India 5
***23.12.2011. SOMALIA. Somali Journalists Walk to mourn for their murdered colleague for Justice in Hamarjajab neighborhood
Mogadishu, 23, Dec. 2011 - A walk event, co-organized by the campaigning team of the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) and the commissioner of Hamarjajab district, started from the scene where the late Abdisalan Hiis was shot at Hamarjajab district in Mogadishu and ended at the Horn Cable Television station where the journalist had worked on Thursday, December 22, 2011
At least 100 journalists attended the walk event which was part of the NUSOJ campaigns to combat impunity and ask for justice to the killers of our slain colleague late Abdisalan Sheik Hassan (Hiis).
All journalists and media officials and members of the Hamarjajab community wore red and white clothes on their heads, which they vowed they will not put off until the killer is brought to court, portraits written on "The killing of Abdisalan Hiis is brutal, journalists are non-combat civilians.". Women from Hamarjajab neighborhood also joined the walk wearing red, yellow and white dresses dressed in white scarf, the same as the female journalists expressing sadness and solidarity for the death of the journalist held portraits written, "Don't kill your Muslim brother, Respect the journalists, respect the non-combat civilians."
Abdirashid Abdulle Abikar, NUSOJ treasurer who addressed the mourners said that Somali journalists are waiting from their government to immediately bring to fair court the killer of our colleague/friend late Abdisalan Sheik Hassan, who was killed on 18 December, 2011 at this neighborhood where the event is taking place.
"We want action!" Abdirashid Abdulle Abikar, NUSOJ official who was delegated to speak on behalf of the union in his opening remarks said, "We want from our government that they immediately bring the killer to court."
Mr. Abikar later thanked to the journalists for the solidarity, courage and bravery they have shown in search for the justice. The union campaigners also spoke at the event reiterated that the government must take action.
Mohamed Ali Ahmed, Hamarjajab district commissioner, where the crime has taken place, condemned the shooting incident, while he pointed out the necessity to work closely with the security services, which will ease the capture of the killer and promised that he will give all necessary help in this case.
The chief of the Somali Military court, Hassan Mohamed Hussein (Muun Gaab) who attended the walk event said that he was surprised by the unity among the journalists who have been protesting since the journalist was murdered and vowed that the military court will take action as soon as the murderer is brought to court.
"The targeted assassinations are the worst crimes among the society." Mohamed Hussein (Muun Gaab), The chief of the Somali Military court said, "On behalf of the Somali military court, I promise that the killer will be brought to court and will be charged according to the law."
Somali journalists with the help of the Somali media community has been launching campaigns for justice for the murdered journalist and campaigns to support the family of the slain journalist late Abdisalan Sheik Hassan.
Somali Journalists vowed that they will not throw away the red and white signs and will not stop campaigning for call to justice until the murderer is found and brought to court.
***22.12.2011. Journalists Dismiss as ‘Travesty of Justice’ Conviction of Swedish Reporters on Terror Charges in Ethiopia
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called for the reversal of the ruling by a court in Ethiopia which found Swedish reporters, Johan Persson and Martin Schibbye, guilty of “supporting a terrorist organisation and illegally entering Ethiopia”. The pair, who was arrested in July while reporting on a project to exploit oil and its impact on the regional environment, faces up to 15 years in prison. “We are outraged by this ruling which amounts to a travesty of justice,” said IFJ President, Jim Boumelha. “Journalists’ contacts with organisations do not in any way represent support for whatever causes they defend. This verdict will not only severely undermine press freedom in Ethiopia but also adversely impact on the country’s good standing and we look to the higher court to set it aside and order the journalists’ release.” Media reports say that the judge in the case of the two reporters accepted that they were “esteemed journalists” but held that “They have not been able to prove that they did not support terrorism.” The IFJ voiced its grave concern over this finding which shifts the burden of proof from prosecution to the accused, noting that the standards of due process have been affected by a clear bias against the two reporters. Today’s verdict has been widely criticised by journalists’ organisations in Africa and beyond. The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) accused the Ethiopian authorities of engaging in a campaign of intimidation to suppress independent reporting on the country’s affairs. “This is a political verdict intended to deter journalists from covering events in a major conflict zone,” EFJ President Arne König said. “We call on the Ethiopian authorities to respect the freedom of the press and release these two journalists who were clearly in the country for genuine journalistic reasons. We also call on the government to act to ensure that all journalists in Ethiopia are free to do their job and not be suppressed through legal actions designed to silence critical voices.” The Eastern Africa Journalists’ Association (EAJA) has also condemned the ruling, calling on the Ethiopian Government to release the two reporters and to respect the right of journalists, including foreign reporters, to report independently on Ethiopian matters. “Our Swedish colleagues, Schibbye and Persson, cannot conceivably be considered terrorists or supporters of a terrorist group,” said EAJA General Secretary, Omar Faruk Osman. “They have suffered enough in detention and we call for their immediate release.”
***21.12.2011. 'Journalists are not Terrorists' Says EFJ ahead of Verdict for Swedish Journalists Arrested in Ethiopia
Today the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) renewed its call for the release of two Swedish photojournalists Johan Persson and reporter Martin Schibbye in Ethiopia. They were arrested on 27 June 2011 while reporting on the rebel movement, the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF), which is fighting the Ethiopian government in the region. The two journalists were also injured after coming under fire from the Ethiopian military.
"These colleagues are clearly not terrorists, and should be released immediately", says EFJ President Arne König. "This is what the EFJ has claimed since the first day, and we see that Martin Schibbye and Johan Persson have been able to show that without a shadow of a doubt in the court".
They will be in court again on Wednesday 21 December for what is expected to be the final day of the trial and also the day on which the court will present a verdict on their case. The journalists are said to be risking up to 15 years imprisonment, in a worst case scenario. They were originally accused of also working with ONLF guerillas in the Ogaden area. These charges were dropped, but the two journalists are still being accused of supporting the guerilla movement.
The Swedish Union of Journalists has had two representatives in Ethiopia since Monday this week. They will talk to the families of their colleagues and be in the Court to offer support on the 21 December.
According to Swedish media reports, the two colleagues were successful in the last parts of the Court hearings, as they were able to tell the court of the working methods of the media with help of American and British war correspondents. Two Swedish editors also acted as witnesses to support the statements of Schibbye and Persson that they were in Ethiopia only for a journalistic purpose. Both men deny any terrorist accusations but admit they entered Ethiopia without permission.
The aim of the two journalists was to investigate how the oil industry exploiting resources in Ethiopia is behaving in connection with human rights. They were specifically interested in Lundin Oil, a company in which the Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt was on the board, and had investments, before becoming a minister.
"We expect our colleagues to be able to enjoy Christmas at home with their families", said König.
Since June this year, eleven journalists have been accused of terrorist activities in Ethiopia, most of them locals. In November alone, six journalists were charged with terrorism.
***20.12.2011. UN CALLS ON RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES TO PROBE KILLING OF DAGESTAN JOURNALIST
New York, Dec 20 2011 10:10AM Two United Nations agencies today called on Russian authorities to conduct an independent and transparent investigation into the recent murder of journalist Khadzhimurad Kamalov in Dagestan and to bring the perpetrators to justice.
Mr. Kamalov, the founder and editor of the independent weekly newspaper Chernovik, was shot dead on 15 December as he was leaving his office. He was also the executive director of the Svoboda Slova (freedom of expression) organization.
His killing is the latest in a series of attacks against journalists, human rights defenders and lawyers in Russia, according to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
Mr. Kamalov had reported extensively on alleged abuses by the police and other human rights violations in Dagestan, OHCHR spokesperson Rupert Colville told reporters in Geneva.
“His murder sends a chilling message to journalists seeking to cover such issues,” he added.
Irina Bokova, the Director-General of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), condemned the killing and urged the authorities to ensure that those responsible are brought to trial.
“Fear must not be allowed to muzzle media professionals, deny reporters the basic human right of freedom of expression and bar citizens from accessing information,” she stated in a news release.
Mr. Kamalov is reportedly the fourth journalist killed in Russia this year, according to sources quoted by the International Press Institute. Dec 20 2011 10:10AM
***19.12.2011. SOMALIA. IFJ Condemns ‘Cold Blood’ Murder of Prominent Journalist
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today urged the Somali Transitional Federal Government to launch an immediate investigation to identify the killer - and whoever ordered the murder - of Abdisalan Sheik Hassan, a prominent Somali journalist who was gunned down in Mogadishu on Sunday. The IFJ says that this incident will serve as a test case for the Government’s commitment to combating the impunity for crimes targeting media in Somalia. “We are appalled by this cold blood murder of a journalist which has shocked the journalists’ community in Somalia,” said IFJ General Secretary, Beth Costa. “The authorities must do their utmost, including seeking outside help, to ensure this crime does not go unpunished. Their claim to respecting press freedom and restoration of rule of law will not survive failure to bring to justice our colleague’s killers.” The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ), an IFJ affiliate, said in a statement that the journalist, who was shot after getting out of his car at the gate of HornCable TV offices, was rushed to Madina hospital where he was declared dead. According to NUSOJ, the slain journalist feared for his life after receiving a string of death threats in recent weeks due to his reports. Hassan recently filmed a meeting at the Somali Transitional Federal Parliament where a group of members sought to remove the Speaker. The footage of the proceedings was aired on HornCable TV which attracted unwelcome interest from some political forces within the Transitional Federal Institutions, his colleagues say. “We strongly condemn this atrocious killing of Abdisalan Sheik Hassan. This murder is a massive loss for journalists and media in Mogadishu, the most dangerous place for Somali journalists in their country,” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. The IFJ has learnt that journalists working in the private media are facing campaign of intimidation in Somalia and is concerned that such an environment can expose them to mob violence and acts of retaliation as a result of their work. “Somalia is already one of the toughest countries for journalists and any attempts to introduce political rivalries in the country’s media are bound to make the situation even more explosive,” added Costa. “We urge all political forces to refrain from any undue interference in journalists’ affairs.” Hassan becomes the fourth journalist to be killed in Somalia this year, making the war ravaged country a permanent feature on the list of the most dangerous countries for journalists in Africa since 2006.
***19.12.2011. Conference organized by The Center for Defending Freedom of Journalists (CDFJ) in Amman
The Center for Defending Freedom of Journalists (CDFJ organized a conference earlier this month during which key media participants squarely ejected charges they were contributing to the ongoing revolts with their coverage http://www.huffingtonpost.com/magda-abufadil/www.cdfj.org>
"Media did not foment Arab revolutions," headlined the English-language *Jordan Times * <http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=44036> quoting former Al Jazeera director general Wadah Khanfar at the CDFJ's Media Freedom Defenders in the Arab World Forum (#MFD2011), who added that "creating the revolutions would be an honor."
Participants agreed that freedom of expression isn't a luxury, it's a right, with CDFJ head Nidal Mansour insisting that "the era of oppression is over."
A major challenge facing the forum was the inability of Syrian blogger Razan Ghazzawi <http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/05/syria-arrested-blogger-razan-ghazzawi> to attend because she was stopped at the Syrian-Jordanian border and arrested for her opposition to the regime of President Bashar Al Assad. Mansour drew heated applause when he saluted those who were absent and barred from attending. A Syrian activist who made it to the conference told me that if a blogger or journalist traveling with a colleague is nabbed by security forces or border police crossing into a neighboring country like Jordan, the other person pretends not to know the detainee so that at least one of them can report the incident to the outside world and bear witness. So are online activists and citizen journalists setting the media agenda? Said Emna Bin Joum'a from Tunisia, where the first spark of the so-called "Arab Spring" began: "I've become a blogger to whom journalists listen, although I'm a journalist." Meanwhile, veteran Egyptian journalist-turned-activist Hedayat Abdel Nabi promoted the need for better protective measures for journalists in conflict zones.
She has been very involved with the Geneva-based Press Emblem Campaign (PEC), an NGO with U.N. consultative status dedicated to combatting impunity, bringing perpetrators of crimes against journalists to trial and providing better protection.
The campaign began following the U.S. invasion of Iraq when Reuters cameraman Mazen Dana was killed by American troops while on assignment there, she said. Abdel Nabi called for an end to targeting journalists, the investigation of recent anti-media crimes, and asked that the CDFJ monitor violations. "International laws don't protect journalists," she said. "We need an international convention to protect them and must join forces with other organizations to do so." The three-day event (two in Amman and one at the Dead Sea) ended with a workshop that drafted recommendations including creating an Arab network to monitor press freedom violations, an annual report, a training manual on journalists' rights, establishing a legal team to pursue media freedom violators, and a unified model for documenting violations.
***09.12.2011. OSCE media representative urges Russian authorities not to harass journalists covering protests
VIENNA, 9 December 2011 -- The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Dunja Mijatović, urged today Russian authorities to protect journalists reporting from the scene of protests from detention and police harassment.
On 5, 6 and 7 December police apprehended about two dozens reporters covering post-election demonstrations in Moscow and Saint Petersburg.
“Journalists must be free to report on public events including protests and demonstrations. The duty of the police is to protect journalists, not harass and detain them. The Russian authorities should investigate all these incidents and ensure that the perpetrators are swiftly prosecuted, ” Mijatović said.
At least two journalists, Forbes.ru editor Aleksei Kamensky and FORUM.msk editor Anatoly Baranov, were charged with refusing to comply with the lawful demands of police officers. Kommersant newspaper correspondent Aleksandr Chernykh said he was beaten by a law enforcement officer during his detention.
Other detained journalists included Bozhena Rynska, a columnist with the Gazeta.ru online newspaper; Timur Zaynullin of the Interfax news agency; Ilya Barabanov, the deputy chief editor of the New Times/Novoye Vremya magazine; Ilya Vasyunin, a reporter with the Dozhd television station; Yana Makarova of the RIA Novosti news agency; and Aleksandr Komelkov of the Arsenevskie Vesti newspaper. Most of them were released after a few hours.
“My Office will continue to follow the situation and the response by the authorities,” said Mijatović. She expressed hope that Russian authorities would recognize the important role journalists play in reporting on matters of public interest. “Safety of journalists throughout the OSCE region remains a major concern and a priority of my work. We are ready to support and assist Russian authorities in ensuring full implementation of their OSCE media-freedom commitments.”
The number of journalists imprisoned worldwide shot up more than 20 percent to its highest level since the mid-1990s, an increase driven largely by widespread jailings across the Middle East and North Africa, the Committee to Protect Journalists has found. In its annual census of imprisoned journalists, CPJ identified 179 writers, editors, and photojournalists behind bars on December 1, an increase of 34 over its 2010 tally.
***25.11.2011. EGYPT. As the world watches Egypt, the threat to journalist safety grows (INSI)
The eyes of the world are once again on Egypt - nine months after violent protests brought down the government of Hosni Mubarak. In the run-up to parliamentary elections next week, violence between protesters and security forces has spiralled, particularly in Cairo. And now, as in February, journalists are faced with a changing and challenging safety situation. The International News Safety Institute is particularly concerned at the apparent extent of the targeting of journalists, with reports of dozens injured, beaten, sexually assaulted and arrested. INSI is also worried that news teams are not able to protect themselves adequately as the Egyptian authorities are impounding equipment such as flak jackets and helmets. INSI has made a formal request on behalf of its members to the Egyptian authorities, asking that news teams are allowed to bring flak jackets and helmets with them to protect themselves, as the situation constantly changes. As in February, Cairo's Tahrir Square has seen some of the most intense violence, with the capital's Mohammad Mahmoud Street the site of vicious protests too. Ahram Online, Egypt's largest news organisation, has reported that security forces are ignoring journalists' credentials and are attacking them with what it calls excessive force. There are individual tales of serious injury too. Ahmed Fiqqy, a journalist from independent media organisation Hoqook.com, was shot in the eye with a live bullet on Monday night and is in urgent need of medical attention. And on Thursday, US-based Egyptian journalist Mona Eltahawy tweeted that she was sexually and physically assaulted while being detained for 12 hours in the interior ministry in Cairo. There have been many more reports of journalists being shot with rubber bullets, beaten, arrested, detained and having their equipment seized or destroyed by security forces. Several journalists have lost their eyes, while others have been shot with live ammunition. A journalist in Alexandria was stripped naked and tortured for five hours by police officers. Almost thirty media workers have reportedly been attacked or harassed in the past week. Many more have suffered the effects of tear gas - severely burning eyes and skin, temporary blindness, choking, dizziness, nausea and disorientation. INSI has specific advice regarding working in such conditions at the link below. In addition to this journalists should never touch discarded tear gas canisters, as this can be extremely painful.
SAFETY ADVICE: INSI urges any journalists attempting to cover the clashes to follow its safety advice on civil unrest, here http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=5925&Itemid=100505 Because of the levels of uncertainty and confusion, we are advising journalists to establish a ‘buddy' system with colleagues. INSI wants to hear from operational journalists and news teams on the ground in Egypt or news desks and security managers with more information about the changing threats there.
***23.11.2011. THE PRESS EMBLEM CAMPAIGN JOINS INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST IMPUNITY. End of Impunity Is Only Deterrence against Violence Targeting Journalists, Says IFJ
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today said that the International Day against Impunity which is celebrated for the first time today is a wake- up call for governments around the world to prevent and punish violence against journalists, thus help making journalism safer. The IFJ and its affiliates are taking part in the global event which is celebrated today to mark the second anniversary of the Maguindanao massacre in the Philippines of 23 November 2009 which claimed 32 lives of journalists and many other civilians. “From Somalia to Sri Lanka, Mexico to The Philippines and Pakistan through Iraq and Eritrea, journalists continue to be put to sword in total impunity,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “The overwhelming majority of victims are local and national journalists who are denied both the protection and justice by their own governments. Today, we are honouring their memory but also making a determined statement of intent to make the end of impunity the lasting legacy of their sacrifice.” The IFJ said in a letter to embassies of the most dangerous countries for journalists, including Iraq, Mexico, the Philippines, Pakistan and Somalia that the culture of impunity is the single biggest factor at the root of violence targeting media. “Such crimes carry no risk of serious investigations and prosecutions, exposing in many cases the absence of the rule of law, whether due to police corruption, judicial incompetence or political indifference,” said the IFJ letter. The Federation’s affiliates around the world echoed the message and have urged governments in their countries and regions to take urgent remedial action, pointing to cases of journalists’ murders which remain unresolved in Africa, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East and Arab world and Latin America. The Federation of African Journalists (FAJ) highlighted the way the civil war has wrecked Somalia and continues to cost journalists’ lives while their colleagues in countries such as Gambia and Eritrea fare no better. The affiliates in Asia Pacific focused on the need to achieve justice for killed journalists such as the victims and the Maguindanao massacre and Lasantha Wickeramatunga in Sri Lanka. In the Middle East and Arab world, where at least 30 journalists have died in 2011 most of them while covering the events of the Arab Spring, IFJ affiliates are calling for killings of journalists in Iraq, Palestine, Yemen, Egypt and Lebanon to stop and their perpetrators to face justice. The IFJ regional organisation in Latin America, FEPALC, is also demanding justice for killed journalists, focusing on Mexico and Honduras. The Colombian affiliate, FECOLPER, has arranged for a minute of silence in memory of killed journalists to be observed on Colombian broadcast media throughout the day. Their European colleagues are also taking part in the activities to end impunity and to show solidarity with killed journalists and those forced into exile to save their lives. The main European event is taking place in London, co-sponsored by the IFJ, the National Union of Journalists of Great Britain and Ireland (NUJ) and the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines. The focus of the event will be on the horror of the Maguindanao massacre in particular, and on the prevailing culture of impunity in the country, in general. In the meantime, the Norwegian Union of Journalists is organising a debate in Oslo with exiled journalists to share experiences of their forced exile and their ongoing struggle to speak out for their less fortunate colleagues who were silenced for good. On their part, IFJ affiliates in Russia and CSI countries are calling for successful prosecutions of killers of their colleagues, including Anna Politkovskaya in Russia, Georgy Gongadze in Ukraine and Elmar Huseynov in Azerbaijan. “It is time to lift the shadow of impunity which has prevented these journalists’ families and colleagues to get justice for their loved ones,” added Beth Costa, IFJ General Secretary. “Today’s message is that the status quo is not an option in the face of the tragedy which continues to befall our colleagues.”
PHILIPPINES. A TURNING POINT AND A TEST. Statement of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility on the second anniversary of the November 23, 2009 Ampatuan Massacre
The international press freedom and media advocacy groups may have designated November 23rd as the International Day to End Impunity. But there in the Philippines, on this, the second anniversary of the foul deed now known as the Ampatuan Massacre, the glacial progress of the trial of those accused of planning and carrying it out has become so much a cause for distress because the possibility that it may drag on for years bodes ill for press freedom, human rights and the quest for justice in Philippine society.
A year ago the pace of the judicial proceedings had already set off alarm bells among journalists’ and media advocacy groups, the kin of those killed, and anyone else who still cared about the future of the free press and democracy in this country.
The Massacre was after all a brutal attack on the free press as an institution necessary in any country with any pretense at democracy, and on the people’s right to choose their leaders. By murdering 58 men and women, among whom were the lawyers, relatives and allies of a candidate for provincial governor, and 32 journalists and media workers, the killers set back press freedom and free elections by so many years, and earned for the country the dubious distinction of being the site, not only of the worst attack on the press in history, but also of a fraudulent democracy.
Both political and media killings have a long and brutal history in this country. Politicians, their allies and their campaign workers are killed so routinely in the Philippines that every election is always declared peaceful, no matter the casualties. On the other hand, the Massacre was a crime waiting to happen. The persistence of warlordism, the antipathy of local tyrants towards the press, and the many weaknesses of the justice system made it inevitable.
The Massacre, however, was also a turning point, and a test of the will and capacity of the Philippine State not only to assure the safety of its citizens, but also of its ability to provide them justice.
The journalists and media advocacy groups knew a year ago, and know it even more now, that unless the Massacre trial is credibly concluded, with the killers and masterminds convicted and sentenced to the prison terms they so richly deserve, not only will the killing of journalists and those of human rights workers, political activists, environmental advocates, judges, lawyers, students, farmers and workers continue; the killings will even escalate.
That distinct possibility makes the Massacre trial so crucial to the life and future of this country. And yet, judging by its laid-back response to, among others, the suggestions for reforms in the rules of court media groups and the Free Legal Assistance Group of lawyers have proposed, the Philippine government does not seem to be in any hurry to address the urgent concerns—for press freedom, democracy, and the country as a whole—the Massacre has triggered.
This simply won’t do. The Aquino government must not only take the steps necessary to speed up this trial; it must also demonstrate, when journalists are killed, that it has put in place the means to punish the killers and masterminds. To do nothing or little can only lead to more deaths, adding to the six already killed in the line of duty since Mr. Benigno Aquino III took office.
FEPALC DEMANDA ACCIÓN DE LOS ESTADOS TRAS DENUNCIAR 32 ASESINATOS DE PERIODISTAS EN LATINOAMÉRICA
FEPALC demanda acción de los Estados tras denunciar 32 asesinatos de periodistas en Latinoamérica
Un enérgico reclamo de justicia en los casos de los 32 periodistas y trabajadores de los medios asesinados en la región demandó la Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (FEPALC). Dicho listado lo hizo público en ocasión del 23 de noviembre, Día Mundial contra la Impunidad, en recuerdo a los 34 periodistas masacrados en Filipinas, en el 2009, en lo que se recuerda como la mayor masacre contra periodistas sucedido en la historia reciente.
La FEPALC exigió, de manera particular a los Estados de México (11), Brasil (6) y Honduras (5) garantizar justicia a las familias de los colegas. Ello porque son estos tres países los que concentran casi el 70 por ciento de los crímenes.
LA FEPALC recordó que América Latina es la región más peligrosa para el ejercicio periodístico. A la fulminante violencia contra quienes ejercen la labor de informar, le sigue la inacción de las autoridades de los Estados que intentan, prioritariamente, deslegitimar la causa de los asesinatos argumentando con frecuencia que responden a la delincuencia común o razones de "índole pasional", descartando cualquier conexión con el trabajo periodístico.
Para la FEPALC la impunidad en la que se mantienen los crímenes está institucionalizando una cultura de la autocensura y el silencio, propia de aquellas sociedades en las que no hay garantías a la vida, integridad física ni condiciones de trabajo dignas para las y los trabajadores del sector.
Por ello, la FEPALC recordó a la opinión pública mundial, en fechas como esta, que los periodistas no nos hemos olvidado de nuestros colegas. La deuda que la justicia tiene en el continente con las familias de los 32 periodistas asesinados tiene que saldarse. En esta tarea la FEPALC respalda y acompaña la acción de sus 14 sindicatos de periodistas afiliados en el continente que no cesan en su búsqueda incesante de justicia.
23 de noviembre 2011 Celso Schroder Presidente FEPALC Zuliana Lainez Secretaria Derechos Humanos FEPALC
Periodistas asesinados en Latinoamérica-Caribe 2011 (32)
México (11) Brasil (6) Honduras (5) Perú (3) Colombia (1) El Salvador (1) Guatemala (1) Haití (1) Panamá (1) Paraguay (1) República Dominicana (1)
MEXICO (11) Rodolfo Ochoa - (Técnico de TV Canal 9) - 9 de febrero Luis Emanuel Ruiz Carrillo (La Prensa) - 24 de marzo José Luis Cerda Meléndez (Televisa) - 30 de marzo Noel Lopez Olguín, (Noticias de Acayucan/DiarioLa Verdad) - 31 de mayo Pablo Ruelas Barraza, (El Diario del Yaqui-El Regional de Sonora) - 13 de junio Miguel Angel López Velasco, (Notiver) - 20 de junio Yolanda Ordaz de la Cruz (Notiver) - 26 de julio Humberto Millán Salazar (Radio Fórmula Diario digital A-Discusión) - 24 de agosto Marcela Yarce Víveros (Revista Contralínea) - 1 de setiembre Rocío González Trápaga (Ex reportera Televisa) - 1 de setiembre María Elizabeth Macías Castro (Primera Hora y Nuevo Laredo en vivo) - 24 de setiembre
BRASIL (6) Luciano Leitao Pedrosa (TV Vitoria-Radio Metropolitana) - 9 de abril Valério Nascimento (Panorama Geral) - 3 de mayo Edinaldo Filgueira (Jornal da Serra) - 15 de junio Auro Ida (Olhar Direto) - 22 de julio Valderlei Canuto Leandro (Programa Señal Verde - Radio Frontera) - 1 de setiembre Gelson Domingos (TV Bandeirantes) - 6 de noviembre
HONDURAS (5) Héctor Francisco Medina Polanco (TV Omega Visión) - 10 de mayo Luis Ernesto Mendoza Cerrato (Canal 24) - 19 de mayo Adán Benitez (Canal 45) - 4 de julio Nery Jeremías Orellana (Radio Comunitaria Jocondera) - 14 de julio Medardo Flores (Radio Uno) - 8 de setiembre PERÚ (3) Julio César Castillo Narváez (Radio Ollantay) - 3 de mayo Pedro Alfonso Flores Silva (Canal 6) - 8 de setiembre José Oquendo Reyes (BTV Canal 45) - 14 de setiembre
COLOMBIA (1) Luis Eduardo Gómez (El Heraldo de Urabá) - 30 de junio
EL SALVADOR (1) Alfredo Hurtado (TV Canal 33) - 25 de abril
GUATEMALA (1) Yansi Roberto Ordoñez Galdámez (Canal 14 - TV Municipal) - 19 de mayo
HAITÍ (1) Louis-Charles Jean-Richard (Radio Kiskeya) - 9 de febrero
PANAMÁ (1) Darío Fernández (Radio Mi Favorita) - 6 de noviembre
PARAGUAY (1) Merardo Alejandro Romero Chávez (Radio La Voz de Itakyry) - 3 de marzo
REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA (1) José Agustín Silvestre de los Santos (Revista y programa TV La Voz de la Verdad) - 2 de agosto
***15.11.2011. SYRIA. RSF urges foreign media to protect their Syrian sources
Reporters Without Borders calls on the foreign media to take greater care to protect the Syrian journalists who work for them and to protect their other sources in Syria. Fixers, interpreters, drivers, interviewees and all others in Syria who provide them with information take great risks to do so. This should be kept in mind. "We know of dozens of Syrians who have been arrested and tortured after giving interviews to foreign media about the repression in their country," Reporters Without Borders said. "Others have been arrested for working for foreign journalists in Syria or abroad. The Syrian security agencies are making unprecedented efforts to identify those who help foreign reporters or talk to them. International media must use the utmost prudence in their contacts with Syrians. Whenever Syrians give an interview about the situation in their country, they and their families are exposed to serious reprisals. "While the media must continue to provide coverage of the situation in Syria that is as detailed and complete as possible, it is also crucial to carefully evaluate the risks taken by those who supply this information. The duty to provide coverage should not be satisfied at the expense of the sources' safety." A Syrian fixer recently complained to Reporters Without Borders about reckless foreign reporters who "seek their 15 minutes of fame by getting themselves arrested" without weighing the consequences for the people who have helped them or accompanied them. If a foreign reporter is arrested in Syria, he faces a few days in detention and then deportation. But Syrians pay a much higher price for their involvement. Reporters Without Borders is aware of dozens of cases of people whose current whereabouts is unknown after they worked for a foreign journalist or just answered a foreign media's questions. Representatives of the exile Syrian National Council and local journalists asked Reporters Without Borders to make it clear to foreign journalists that they should stop visiting Syria until the situation has evolved. "They should leave the country ASAP and stay out," one local journalist said. "This is not our message," Reporters Without Borders added. "But we do urge all journalists to take the utmost care, especially as many of them do not know the country and are unaware of the methods used by the mukhabarat (intelligence services) to identify those who cooperate with foreign media."
***09.11.2011. BRAZIL. IFJ Urges Greater Protection for Media on Perilous Assignments in Brazil after Cameraman Dies in Crossfire
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the shooting in which cameraman Gelson Domingos da Silva was killed on Sunday 6 November 2011. Gelson, who worked for several TV stations, including Andeirantes TV, was shot in the chest while covering the police operation against drug dealers in Antares, a slum area of the city of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. “We mourn the tragic death of Gelson, a consummate professional, who paid the ultimate sacrifice for the job he loved and convey our sympathy to his family and colleagues,” said Beth, Costa, IFJ General Secretary. “But we also urge media owners in Brazil to review all measures taken to provide the safety and security of journalists who are sent to dangerous assignments in order to prevent the repeat of such tragedy.” Media reports say that the fatal shooting came when elements of the Special Operations Battalion of the federal police in City of Rio were pursuing armed groups involved in drug dealings deep inside the slum of Antares. A fire fight broke up and Gelson was hit in the chest by a bullet which pierced his flak jacket as he stood filming behind the police. The Death of Gelson, an award winning cameraman, has sparked a debate in Brazil about the working conditions of journalists, including their safety following reports that many media had voiced concerns over the risks of embedding journalists with police to report on their operations. In a statement, the Federaçao Nacional do Jornalistas (FENAJ), an IFJ affiliate, paid tribute to Gelson who last year with his team won the Vladimir Herzog and Human Rights Prize for their report on killings in northeastern region of Brazil. The Federation called on the government to hunt down Gelson’s killers and bring them to justice while ensuring that journalists are provided with adequate protection. FENAJ says that Gelson’s killing should serve as a wake-up call for all media companies to review their existing protocol for the safety of journalists and work with the Federation to agree on the credible measures to provide media with a safer environment and better working conditions. The IFJ supports FENAJ which has also asked the authorities to investigate the circumstances of the cameraman’s death after TV companies in Brazil were accused of resorting to pooling in news gathering and sharing of material on dangerous activities which allows them to deploy fewer journalists and pay them less. It was reported that Gelson was also driving his TV van, something FENAJ considers to be a breach of safety standards in high risks situations while a colleague is quoted as saying that the flak jackets available to Brazilian journalists are of inferior quality. “The loss of Gelson is made much worse by claims of lack of adequate preparation for dangerous reporting,” added Costa. “We support FENAJ’s call for a thorough examination of all the facts of this tragic death in full transparency to provide answers which should serve as a lesson for the future.”
***04.11.2011. News organisations demand global action to stop killing of journalists
Cascais, Portugal, 4 November - More than 400 representatives of global news organisations today issued a call for global action to halt the killing of journalists. Gathered at the News Xchange 2011 convention in the Portuguese resort, they backed a resolution demanding the killers of journalists be brought to justice and committed themselves to "create maximum exposure" for each and every death. The motion, proposed by the International News Safety Institute and supported by the European Broadcasting Union which runs News Xchange, noted that more than 1,100 news media staff have been killed in the past 10 years. Over 100 have died this year alone, with Libya being the worst killing ground. Nine out of 10 killers of journalists are never held to account, "fueling a culture of impunity that helps encourage more deaths," the resolution said. Backed by more than 90 percent of the 440 news executives from major world news organisations at the conference, it stated: "We, the News Xchange community, call on the authorities and governments whose jurisdictions are involved in any unresolved cases to bring the killers of journalists to justice. "We are also committed to reaearching these suspicious deaths through journalistic endeavour, wherever possible, and creating the maximum exposure for each death. Any developments will be reported back to News Xchange 2012." INSI said it will put the resolution before the United Nations and other concerned governments and world bodies.
Resolution: "In the past 10 years more than 1,100 news media workers have been killed. Most were murdered or died in suspicious circumstances. "Nine out of 10 killers of journalists around the world escape justice, creating a culture of impunity that helps encourage more deaths. "We the News Xchange community call on the authorities and governments whose jurisdictions are involved in any unresolved cases to bring the killers of journalists to justice. "We are also committed to researching these suspicious deaths through journalistic endeavour, wherever possible, and creating the maximum exposure for each death. "Any developments will be reported back to News Xchange 2012."
***31.10.2011. LIBYA. Reporting conflict: competition, pressure and risks (Frontline Club)
By Helena Williams
In a year where 100 journalists have been killed so far while trying to tell the story, and as the media’s coverage of events rocking the Middle East have been brought into sharp relief, it seems high time to examine the delicate relationship between ensuring the safety of journalists and being able to break the story first.
“Libya has been a very traumatic year for journalists, especially for freelance journalists. We lost three good friends,” muses Inigo Gilmore, an award-winning freelance journalist who has worked in conflict zones across the Middle East, Africa and Asia.
“No one even imagined Libya would turn to this. How could we [journalists] predict what would happen on the frontline?”
Last night’s talk at The Frontline Club, ‘Reporting Conflict: Competition, pressure and risks’ highlighted the risks that journalists out in the field and news editors back in London face while attempting to break news to an increasingly demanding audience.
Chaired by former BBC executive Vin Ray, and with international editor for ITV news Bill Neely, head of international news at Sky News Sarah Whitehead, and BBC’s world news editor Jon Williams sitting on the panel alongside Gilmore, the debate was able to focus on the difficulties of conflict reporting from opposing sides of the industry – both those commissioning journalists to go to the frontline, and the journalists themselves.
Neely, who previously worked as a journalist in conflict zones, was adamant that the first and constant pressure of covering war did not come from newsrooms in London, but rather from the competitive nature of journalists who want to go and get the story.
As international editor for ITV, Neely said that old pressures from the newsroom no longer exist, and journalists must travel to hotspots on a voluntary basis.
But he says that although journalists have to be savvy while out in the field (“don’t stay anywhere for longer than 20 minutes in a warzone”), it is also up to the editors to monitor the situation.
“Over the past 10 years editors in London understand that it’s people on the ground who have to make the decision not to go those 100 metres up the road.”
Whitehead, whose Sky news teams were hailed for their incredible coverage of Green Square in Libya earlier this year, agreed.
“You’re not there and you have to make sure they [the journalists] can make the decision. This year has been one of the most extreme and dangerous that I’ve known.
“This year I have taken people off air who have been in the middle [of reporting]. One afternoon, when a team was watching a fire fight in Tripoli, snipers opened up behind them and I pulled them off air and asked what their exit route was.
“You have to be there to be the stops if they are taken over by the story.”
While some news agencies were criticised for their less dramatic coverage of the events unfolding in Libya, Whitehead was adamant that a lot of her team’s reporting was down to luck.
“They [Sky News] were at the right place at the right time, and in the right frame of mind. They didn’t know where they were going to end up. A lot of people made other decisions and it was the right decisions for them.”
Williams, who has also had his fair share of managing journalists in hostile environments, said “risk must outweigh return, but it is a very fine balance. It’s a difficult call to go forward, and it’s just as difficult to go back. If you have the balls to go back because you don’t think it’s safe I take my hat off to you.”
“It’s risk and reward. You have to ask yourself, ‘is it really worth that extra shot?’” added Neely.
“War reporting is a mixture of judgement and luck – but you can be unlucky. For those 100 journalists this year, for one reason or another, their luck ran out.”
***07.10.2011. RUSSIA: FIVE YEARS AFTER POLITKOVSKAYA'S ASSASSINATION, IMPUNITY STILL REIGNS
With the five-year anniversary of the murder of investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya on 7 October, the recent arrest of the alleged gunmen and conspirator bring little hope to numerous IFEX members, including Russian members the Glasnost Defence Foundation (GDF) and the Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations (CJES).
"We again hear that the case has almost entirely been solved," GDF said. "We hear that new conspirators gave testimony and will be charged, but these 'new' conspirators were mentioned in the previous trial."
Indeed, alleged gunman Gustam Makhmudov's two brothers were acquitted of murder charges after the last flawed trial in 2009. The other conspirator facing trial, Dmitry Pavlyuchenkov, Moscow's former police head of surveillance, was called as a witness in the previous trial.
Makhmudov fled the country with the help of high-up accomplices and was a fugitive for many years before his arrest in May of this year, reports RSF, while Pavlyuchenkov was arrested this August.
IFEX members report that Payvlyuchenkov is alleged to have ordered members of his staff to track Politkovskaya's movements. He's said to have named other individuals involved, and called Lom Ali Gaitukayev, the ringleader of an organised crime group that performed the contract killing.
The individuals who ordered the crime still remain free, however, covered by a "veil of secrecy," as CJES puts it. CJES says it is unconvinced by the theory of the prosecutor - that the killing was perpetrated by exiled oligarch and Putin enemy, Boris Berezovsky, in an attempt to discredit the then-President and now Prime Minister of Russia.
Five years ago, Politkovskaya was gunned down in broad daylight in the stairwell of her apartment building by an individual wearing a baseball cap, who was captured on security cameras.
Politkovskaya authored three books and wrote for the newspaper "Novaya Gazeta". Her in-depth investigations into Russian violence in the North Caucasus, including Chechnya, exposed the human rights violations there for the world to know, says the International Press Institute (IPI). She was critical of both Putin and current president of the Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov.
In the past decade, 17 journalists have been murdered with impunity in Russia, reports CPJ. On 23 November, IFEX members will be commemorating the inaugural International Day to End Impunity to raise public awareness of how prevalent impunity is in the free expression field, as well as to showcase the important work IFEX members have been doing to fight against it. Find out more at: http://www.daytoendimpunity.org
***07.10.2011.YEMEN.IFJ Welcomes Nobel Peace Prize Award to Yemeni Journalist
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today welcomes the news of the 2011 Nobel Peace Prize which was awarded to Yemeni journalist Tawakkul Karman. She shares the prize with Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and her fellow Liberian Leymah Gbowee “for their non-violent struggle for the safety of women and for women’s rights to full participation in peace-building work.”
“This is excellent news and we warmly congratulate Karman whose tenacity, courage and humanity have been deservedly rewarded,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “This is also the recognition of her remarkable campaign for press freedom in Yemen which the IFJ and our Yemeni affiliate, the Yemeni Journalists’ Syndicate of which she is a member, have always supported.”
The Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the prize to Karman, noting that “In the most trying circumstances, both before and during the “Arab spring”, Tawakkul Karman has played a leading part in the struggle for women’s rights and for democracy and peace in Yemen."
Karman leads the Yemeni organisation of Women Journalists without Chains which campaigns for press freedom and she supports anti-government protests for democratic change in the country. She was arrested and detained on many occasions as a result of the outspoken criticism of the President Saleh’s rule.
The IFJ says her award shows that the Yemeni journalists don’t stand alone and that their call for a tolerant and open society in Yemen has strong international support.
“This is an outstanding personal achievement for Kamar as the first Arab woman to receive the Nobel Peace Prize,” added Beth Costa, IFJ General Secretary. “But her goal to secure peace and fundamental rights to her fellow citizens is an inspiration to journalists and peace loving people across the world.”
***05.10.2011. RUSSIA. Crimes against journalists must not go unpunished, says OSCE media freedom representative on fifth anniversary of Politkovskaya murder
STRASBOURG, France, 5 October 2011 – Commemorating the fifth anniversary of the murder of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Dunja Mijatović, today presented her latest assessment of threats and responses to attacks against journalists in the OSCE region.
“The right of journalists to carry out their work in safety, without fear of being harassed, attacked, beaten or killed is fundamental to the protection of all other human rights,” said Mijatović at an event organized by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Thomas Hammarberg, on protection of journalists from violence. “As long as journalists are afraid for their lives and the lives of their families while doing their job, we do not live in a free society.”
She highlighted the fact that in the last five years only three out of almost 30 murders of journalists in the OSCE region have been sucessfully prosecuted. "This casts serious doubts on the effectiveness of law-enforcement bodies and the judiciary in dealing with such crimes."
“Governments and political leaders can help by publicly defending journalists’ rights and resisting any attempts to silence journalists. They can also demand that there is no impunity for the perpetrators and instigators of these murders,” said Mijatović.
The Representative’s report, in English and Russian, can be accessed at www.osce.org/fom/83569
***30.09.2011. MEXICO. UN deeply concerned about the recent killings of, and other brutal attacks against, journalists in Mexico - Statement by Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: Rupert Colville
"We are deeply concerned about the recent killings of, and other brutal attacks against, journalists in Mexico, illustrating increasing insecurity in general and the exceptionally vulnerable situation of journalists in particular, as well as the deteriorating situation of freedom of expression in the country. The most recent journalist to be killed was María Elizabeth MACÍAS, an employee of the Nuevo Laredo newspaper Primera Hora, whose decapitated and mutilated body was found last Saturday (24 Sept). Her postings on internet-based social networks were often critical of violent groups. Alongside her body was a handwritten message allegedly signed by the Zetas drug cartel saying that she had been killed in retaliation for her postings. Eleven days earlier (13 Sept), a man and a woman were found dead, hanging from an overpass in Nuevo Laredo with a handwritten message saying "this is what will happen to internet users.” It is clear that such killings are designed to send a chilling message to silence reports on drug gang violence and to challenge campaigns led by the authorities to promote anonymous reporting of criminal activities. In September alone, in addition to the above, the UN human rights office in Mexico has publicly condemned three other murders of journalists. Other gruesome killings have also continued to take place in Mexico. On 27 September, five severed heads were found inside a bag alongside boards with messages on them in Acapulco, Guerrero. On 20 September, two trucks containing the bodies of 23 men and 12 women, who had been tortured and murdered, were abandoned in a busy street in Veracruz City. The UN human rights office in Mexico is monitoring this case and checking into reports that journalists were threatened at gunpoint at the Veracruz morgue. We understand the challenge the Mexican Government is facing in its fight against rising violence. However, we are also extremely concerned at the prevalent impunity regarding these killings, and the many other similar crimes committed in recent years. We are particularly concerned that some of these crimes appear to have been committed with the cooperation or acquiescence of state agents. We urge the Mexican authorities to launch immediate full and impartial investigations into these events. We also remind them of their obligation to protect all people in Mexico from the threats to the enjoyment of their fundamental rights, particularly their right to life, to security and integrity of the person, and to freedom of expression."
***29.09.2011. RUSSIA. Safety of journalists remains top priority, OSCE media freedom representative tells Russian journalists
SOCHI, Russia, 29 September 2011 – The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Dunja Mijatović, said today that urging governments to ensure the safety of journalists, which is threatened by a climate of impunity, will continue to be her top priority. Mijatović spoke on a panel discussion on journalists’ safety and impunity in the OSCE region at the 15th annual convention of the Russian Union of Journalists "All Russia" in Sochi. The panel included, among others, Russian Presidential Adviser Mikail Fedotov, Glasnost defence foundation president Alexei Simonov and Gazeta Wyborcza editor-in-chief Adam Michnik. “This impunity from prosecution is caused by a system where government and legal authorities are unwilling or unable to condemn, let alone successfully investigate, these criminal acts,” she said. “This, of course, causes further violence.” “The wave of violence ripples across many OSCE countries,” she said. Mijatović estimated that in the OSCE region alone more than 30 journalists had been killed in the past five years, with many more beaten or threatened with their lives. Citing recent progress in the Anna Politkovskaya and other murder cases achieved by Russia’s Investigative Committee, led by Alexander Bastrykin, Mijatović noted that the situation is improving in Russia, but much more needs to be done. “Here, in Russia, where many problems have festered over the past 20 years, it is especially encouraging to see that authorities at the top of government are beginning to take a proactive role in solving murder cases against journalists, but much more needs to be done, ” she said. While attending the conference, Mijatović discussed possible areas of further co-operation with Fedotov, who is the chair of Russia’s Presidential Council for the Advancement of Civil Society and Human Rights.
***27.09.2011.YEMEN – Third journalist killed since start of protests (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders has learned that that Al-Hurra TV cameraman Hassan Al-Wadhaf died a few days after being hospitalized in a critical condition on 18 September as a result of a serious injury to the left eye.
He received the injury while covering attacks by security forces and baltajiyas (militiamen) on demonstrators in Sanaa, in which 26 people were killed. Journalists who were with Wadhaf on 18 September said men in civilian dress deliberately fired rocket-propelled grenades at the crowd.
Wadhaf is the third journalist to be killed since the start of the protests in Yemen. The first two were Jamal Al-Sharabi of Al-Masdar and Mohamed Yahia Al-Malayia of Al-Salam, who were killed on 18 March.
Reporters Without Borders, which offers its sincere condolences to Wadhaf’s family, friend colleagues, urges the United Nations Human Rights Council to appoint a special rapporteur to investigate all the violations against the civilian population, including journalists, since the start of the protests.
Reporters Without Borders is very concerned about the surge in violence against journalists in Yemen since President Ali Abdallah Saleh’s return from Saudi Arabia on 23 September. The atrocities against the civilian population are on the increase.
Security forces fired on the Sanaa homes of two journalists on 23 September – Rashida Al-Qiyali, who is also a writer, and Mujib Al-Hamidi, who works for the newspaper Al-Sahwa. As Abdul Salam Mohamed, a journalist with the Saba news agency, left his home on 23 September, he was fired on by a sniper who fortunately missed his target.
The headquarters of the Union of Journalists came under fire on the evening of 23 September as government forces and pro-government militiamen (baltajiyas) tried to take control of Change Square. TV journalist Abdel Majid Al-Samawi was injured by sniper fire on the afternoon of the same day as he was leaving 60th Street, where government opponents had gathered. He was admitted to a hospital where doctors said his injury was not life-threatening.
Access to the independent news website Yemen Nation was blocked on 25 September for the second time since the start of the protests.
***18.09.2011. PARIS FORUM ADOPTS DRAFT UN ACTION PLAN TO IMPROVE SAFETY OF JOURNALISTS
New York, Sep 18 2011 7:10PM Participants at a United Nations forum that met in Paris have drafted an action plan to improve the safety of journalists and ensure that crimes committed against them do not go unpunished.
More than 500 media professionals have been killed in the course of their duties over the past decade, according to the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which hosted last week's forum.
It points out that many more have been assaulted, abducted, sexually violated, intimidated, harassed, arrested or illegally detained.
In addition, the vast majority of these crimes did not concern international war correspondents but journalists working in their home countries, often in times of peace, and covering local stories. The instigators for the most part, remain unpunished.
The draft plan adopted by the forum, which brought together representatives of UN agencies, progra mmes and funds, envisions the establishment of a coordinated inter-agency mechanism to handle issues connected to the safety of journalists and impunity.
Safety and impunity are also to be incorporated into UN contributions to national strategies, notably development assistance programmes and the possible inclusion of media stakeholders in some of the preparatory processes of the UN's development projects.
The draft also foresees the extension of work already conducted by UNESCO to prevent crimes against media workers, including assisting countries to develop legislation and mechanisms favourable to freedom of expression and information.
Awareness-raising campaigns will also be conducted with Member States, civil society, non - governmental organizations and concerned bodies about issues of freedom of expression, journalists' safety and the danger of impunity to democracy, UNESCO stated.
The draft plan will be presented to UNESCO's International Programme for the Development of C ommunication (IPDC) at its next session in March 2012 and will then be submitted to the bodies in charge of UN-wide coordination.
Sep 18 2011 7:10PM
***14.09.2011. UN conference on journalist safety hears concerns of news community - action promised (INSI)
Paris, 14 September - A UN conference on news safety and impunity heard the concerns of major journalist support organisations on Tuesday as the world body sought to draw up a coordinated plan to tackle the issue.
The inter-agency conference, involving relevant UN agencies and attended by Under-Secretary-General for Communications Kiyotaka Akasaka, was organised by UNESCO following a decision by its International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) in 2010.
It sought an inter-agency meeting to formulate "a comprehensive, coherent and action-oriented approach to the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity."
The action emphasises growing concern at the rising number of attacks on journalists around the world. INSI counts more than 1,000 deaths over the past 10 years with many more physical attacks. Fewer than 2 out of 10 killers of journalists around the globe are brought to justice, fuelling a climate of impunity that produces more of the same.
Leading journalist support groups and other concerned organisations were invited to submit views and proposals.
INSI and others urged measures to give teeth to UN Security Council Resolution 1738 on the safety of journalists in conflict and on the end to impunity.
Director Rodney Pinder also called for UN media development to provide for safety training and said donor nations should consider a nation's record on impunity when considering whether to grant development aid.
INSI also submitted a detailed analysis of worldwide casualties in 2010 contained in its annual Killing The Messenger report.
The all-party conference on Tuesday was followed by a UN agency meeting on Wednesday charged with drafting a concrete plan of action.
Other journalist support groups participating in the conference included the International Press Institute (IPI), the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Article 19, the Inter American Press Association (IAPA), the Media Foundation of West Africa, the Southeast Asia Press Alliance (SEAPA), the Arabic Network of Human Rights Information (ANHRI), the Centre for Freedom of the Media (CFOM), the International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX), Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and the World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC).
International organisations included the UNDP, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe and the International Red Cross (ICRC).
Other speakers included Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova, Frank La Rue, UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression and Pansy Tlakula, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression for the African Union.
More details of the conference and related documents are on the UNESCO website.
***13.09.2011. UN FORUM HEARS CALLS FOR GREATER PROTECTION OF JOURNALISTS
New York, Sep 13 2011 2:10PM Top United Nations officials today urged better protection of journalists and greater efforts to ensure that those who kill or intimidate them are brought to justice, stressing that freedom of the press is a basic foundation of peace and democracy.
An inter-agency forum on the safety of journalists, hosted by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in Paris, heard calls for UN offices and entities to work more closely together to protect media professionals and fight impunity for their killers.
“Let us do our utmost to ensure that the media can do its indispensable work on behalf of humankind,” said Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in a <"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=5508">message to the forum, delivered behalf by Kiyo Akasaka, the Under-Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information.
He noted that cyber-surveillance, digital harassment and censorship of the Internet had emerged as new barriers to media freedom.
“The press can never be free if journalists and media workers are under attack. Those who murder, kidnap, harass, arrest or intimidate journalists not only stop the free flow of information, they stifle the ability of millions of people to have their stories told.
“Quite apart from the violence and the suffering such crimes bring, I am also dismayed when they are not thoroughly investigated and prosecuted. Only by putting an end to impunity can we break this vicious cycle,” said the Secretary-General.
Mr. Akasaka, for his part, highlighted the role the UN has played to uphold the freedoms of information, expression and association, which he described as fundamental principles in democratic societies.
The UN Department of Public Information (DPI), he said, uses mass communication tools – such as the Internet, television, photography, radio, print and social media – to uphold the principle of freedom of the press and to raise awareness on the issue.
The meeting was also addressed by the Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Irina Bokova, the UNESCO Director-General.
Separately, Ms. Bokova issued statements condemning the recent killings of journalists in Peru and Honduras and demanding that the culprits brought to justice.
***11.09.2011. Declaration Adopted by IFJ/EFJ Conference on ‘Journalism in the Shadow of Terror Laws’
The international conference organised by the International Federation (IFJ) and the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) on ‘ Journalism in the Shadow of Anti-Terror Laws’ has concluded today in Brussels by calling for a review of anti –terror legislation which undermines journalists’ independence . The following is the Declaration which was adopted after two days of debates on the impact of anti-terror legislation on journalism following the 9/11 attacks in America: We, the participants at the IFJ/EFJ Conference “10 years after 9/11, Journalism in the Shadow of Terror Laws”, held in Brussels on 10th-11th September, Noting that since the September 11th terrorist attacks on the United States, the response by governments to the threat of terrorism had been massively disproportionate, resulting in · fundamental rights being routinely violated and undermined, · a raft of mass surveillance measures targeting journalists and media organisations being introduced, · laws and regulations that undermine almost half of the minimum standards set out in the 1948 UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights being enacted by governments, often in the absence of scrutiny and debate, and · media and independent journalism suffering in a “pervasive atmosphere of paranoia” which is leading to dangerous levels of self-censorship,
Recognising that these laws, when adopted in democratic states, are used by authoritarian regimes to reinforce their oppressive systems, and in most instances have served to restrict dissent inside and outside media and to curtail free speech, Believing that all forms of indiscriminate violence and terrorism are unacceptable and threaten journalism and press freedom, Concerned that the majority of counter-terrorism measures adopted by states over the past decade have helped usher in a ‘surveillance society’ with new high-tech forms of ‘dataveillance’ been used to monitor journalists’ activities, with spies and undercover agents been active in newsrooms, and with phones and computers been tapped and movements recorded, Rejecting the message that fundamental rights can be sacrificed to fight terrorism and further concerned that ‘national security’ interest continues to enable governments to withhold information or override the constitutional and legal protections that should be afforded to citizens, journalists and whisteblowers alike, DECLARE 1. That governments must not sacrifice civil liberties under the pretext of security; 2. That all counter-terrorism and national security laws, among them those hastily enacted immediately after September 11, should be reviewed to ensure compliance with international human rights and freedom of expression norms and prevent the misuse of anti-terror laws against journalists; 3. That mandatory data retention regimes must be repealed, and that restrictions and controls on the use of surveillance powers and new security technologies, as well as robust new mechanisms to protect personal privacy be established; 4. That journalists and editors must maintain editorial independence and guard against self-censorship, and that media need more than ever to be active in the scrutiny of the actions of government; 5. That independent journalism’s vital role in investigating and exposing the impact of changes in national and global security policy on society at large is crucial to the future of democratic society; 6. That independent organisation of journalists in unions and associations is an essential safeguard for press freedom, self-regulation and editorial independence; 7. That all forms of violence against media and targeting of media workers are completely unacceptable; 8. That all restrictions on journalists’ freedom of movement, pressure on them to reveal sources of information, and manipulation of media by political leaders on security issues are unacceptable, 9. That the IFJ/EFJ should a) strengthen their campaign among journalists’ unions everywhere to raise awareness of security policies and their impact on the right to report, b) reiterate IFJ policy on the importance of pluralism, diversity, press freedom and open government at national and international level, and the need for tolerance in journalism, as adopted at the Bilbao international conference in 1997, and reiterated in 2005, c) build the wider coalition with other trades unions, human rights campaigners, employers, whenever appropriate, other media organisations and relevant civil society groups against further attacks on civil liberties and democratic rights, d) advocate for the introduction of freedom of information laws that guarantee citizens the right of access to public information and restrict the application of national secrecy provisions and for the elimination of all laws that criminalise journalism, or restrict the protection of sources, e) promote debates at national and international level on the need for professional vigilance, ethical conduct and improvement of journalists’ capacity to work and investigate without undue pressure from whatever source, and the need for tolerance in journalism. Adopted in Brussels on 11 September 2011 For more information, please contact Ernest Sagaga (ernest.sagaga@ifj.org ) on + 32 2 235 2207) or Yuk Lan Wong (yuklan.wong@ifj.org) on + 32 2 235 2226)
***08.09.2011. AFGHANISTAN. IFJ Mourns BBC Journalist Killed by Nato Forces in Afghanistan
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today said that the killing of BBC reporter Ahmed Omed Khpulwak, who was shot dead by a member of Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) in Afghanistan, is a reminder of the risks to journalists who are working in conflict zones. Isaf has admitted that the journalist was killed in July by a US soldier who mistook him for an insurgent during a firefight at the Afghan Radio Television (RTA). “We note Isaf’s admission but urge all sides to the conflict to ensure that media facilities are not turned into combat zones,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “This tragic incident must be properly assessed to serve a lesson for future interventions on premises where journalists and media staff work.” In a statement, Isaf said Omed of the BBC Pashto service was shot by a soldier who feared he was an insurgent about to set off a device. The shooting occurred as soldiers were clearing the RTA building of militants, two of whom had detonated bombs injuring soldiers. According to some reports, the journalist was attempting to produce his press card when he was killed. The BBC reacted to the admission, recognising that “Isaf had provided clarification, ending a period of uncertainty, but it would study the details of the findings on receiving the full report.” The IFJ says that this latest deadly incident shows the urgency in finding ways to provide journalists with adequate protection. The Federation plans to push for concrete measures and governments’ commitment to protecting media during the forthcoming United Nations Inter-Agency Meeting on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity which will take place next week in Paris. “The death of Omed in such violent circumstances is one too many and we must resolve to act in the defence of journalists’ safety with more vigour and purpose than ever before,” added Beth Costa, IFJ General Secretary.
***04.09.2011. SOMALIA. Malaysian journalist killed, another wounded in Mogadishu Shoot Out
The National Union of Somali Journalists condemns the shooting incident that left a Malaysian cameraman dead and another wounded in Mogadishu's KM4 area on late Friday afternoon.
Noramfaizul Mohd Nor, 41, a cameraman for the Malaysian National News Agency was shot to death and Aji Saregar Mazlan, A TV3 journalist was wounded after shooting incident took place in KM4 area on late Friday afternoon, journalists and witnesses reported.
"This tragedy took place when the convoy of cars carrying the Malaysian aid workers met a convoy from the Ugandan contingent of AMISOM ( The AU peace-keeping force in Somalia ), which then opened fire." The Ministry of Information, Posts and Telecommunication said in a statement.
The death of Noramfaizul Mohd Nor was confirmed by Malaysian National News Agency, where he was working for. The Journalists were accompanying Putera 1 Malaysia Club, a 2 month humanitarian mission to Somalia.
Noramfaizul leaves behind a wife Norazrina Jaafar, 37, and two sons, Mohd Irfan, 8, and Mohd Naufal, 3.
"There was a Somali technical vehicle and African Union convoy following behind the car in which the journalists were traveling with." said a journalist who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "
An eyewitnesses interviewed said the African Union Mission in Somalia fired at the journalists.
The African Union mission in Somalia has not commented the shooting incident yet.
"We send our deepest condolences to the families and friends of Noramfaizul Mohd and ask Allah to reward him paradise." Mohammed Ibrahim, NUSOJ Secretary General said, "We Condemn the shooting incident while we call for the African Union Mission and the Transitional Federal Government to investigate the shooting incident immediately and bring the killers to justice." said Mohammed Ibrahim, NUSOJ Secretary General
Foreign journalists and Aid workers have been pouring into the Somali capital Mogadishu in recent months in response the severe droughts that hit the country.
Last month, Radio SIMBA staffer, Farah Hassan Sahal, was killed by sniper fires at the radio compound in Mogadishu's Bakara market, apparently from the African Union Mission in Somalia or the Government forces.
For further information, contact: National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) Human Rights House, Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, Tel: +252 1 859 944, e-mail: nusoj@nusoj.org.so / newsletter@nusoj.org.so Internet: http://www.nusoj.org.so
***01.09.2011. SYRIA: SENIOR UN OFFICIAL VOICES ALARM AT ONGOING ABUSES AGAINST JOURNALISTS
New York, Sep 1 2011 10:10AM The head of the United Nations agency defending press freedom has voiced her alarm at continuing abuses committed against journalists in Syria and called on authorities to respect basic human rights, including the right to freedom of expression.
These include news that Syrian caricaturist Ali Ferzat had been beaten by armed men on 25 August, and concern for freelance journalist Hanadi Zahlout, who has been in jail since her arrest on 25 July.
“I am alarmed at continuing reports of detention and physical abuse against journalists,” said Ms. Bokova. “Torture and detention will never convince the people of Syria that might is right.
“It is essential for the future of the country and its people that the authorities respect freedom of expression and listen to what their critics have to say,” she stated.
As many as 2,000 Syrians have been killed in the past five months since the start of the pro-democracy protests, which are part of a broader uprising across North Africa and the Middle East that has led to the toppling of long-standing regimes in Tunisia and Egypt and conflict in Libya.
A recent UN report found that the Syrian Government’s “widespread and systematic” attacks against its own people may amount to crimes against humanity and possibly warrant an investigation by the International Criminal Court.
***26.08.2011. LIBYA. Six Libyan journalists still missing (CPJ)
New York, August 25, 2011--The Committee to Protect Journalists welcomes the release of four Italian journalists kidnapped Wednesday, but remains concerned about the safety of at least six Libyan journalists who have been missing since the start of the uprising in February. The whereabouts of the six Libyan journalists who have been missing for the past six months are still unknown. Two of them were detained in late February, but are still unaccounted for.
"The events of the past week show how dangerous Libya remains for all journalists," said CPJ Deputy Director Robert Mahoney. "We hope that as the hostilities subside, the whereabouts of the Libyan journalists who are still missing become clear."
Atef al-Atrash, a contributor to local news outlets in Benghazi, disappeared on February 17 after speaking on air on Al-Jazeera. Mohamed al-Sahim, a blogger and critical political writer, Mohamed al-Amin, a cartoonist, and Idris al-Mismar, a writer and the former editor-in-chief of Arajin, a monthly culture magazine, have also been reported missing. Two Tripoli-based journalists--Salma al-Shaab, head of the Libyan Journalists Syndicate, and Suad al-Turabouls, a correspondent for the pro-government Al-Jamahiriya--were detained in late February, but have not been heard from since. All six journalists' whereabouts are still unknown.
Four Italian journalists kidnapped on Wednesday were released after a raid on the apartment in which they were being held captive, the BBC reported. Their driver, however, was killed during their abduction, news reports said. The journalists had been captured by forces loyal to Col. Muammar Qaddafi, Italy's Corriere della Serareported.
Matthew VanDyke, a U.S. journalist who had been missing in Libya since March 13, was freed from Abu Salim prisonin Tripoli with several inmates on Wednesday after the prison was seized by rebel forces. His mother told CPJ that he had been held in solitary confinement for most of his imprisonment.
On August 11, Tracey Shelton, a freelance Australian journalist, was brutally attacked by two armed men in her Benghazi hotel room and escaped by jumping to a nearby balcony. She is recovering in another Benghazi hotel with rebels protecting her.
On Wednesday, two French journalists were shot and wounded in Tripoli while covering the fighting around Muammar Qaddafi's Bab al-Azizya compound, Agence France-Presse reported. A French cameraman for France 2 network, Bruno Girodon, was hit by a bullet, and Paris Match photographer Alvaro Canovas was shot in the thigh by an assault rifle. They were both taken to a hospital on Wednesday and are recovering from their wounds.
***25.08.2011. LIBYA. INSI Safety Advisory 1700 GMT August 25
Four Italian journalists kidnapped in Libya on Wednesday have been released unharmed, although their driver was killed. The four are reported to have been freed after a raid on a house in Tripoli were they were being held.
The situation for news crews in the country remains extremely precarious. The International News Safety Institute is coordinating an email forum, for the exchange of confidential and sensitive information between journalists on the ground and news desks. Those interested in participating should contact Hannah Storm at hannah.storm@newssafety.org
INSI is issuing this safety advisory for news crews at 1700 GMT on August 25, but advises journalists that because the situation is constantly changing, teams and desks should be constantly assessing the situation and, where possible, have exit plans in place.
Large parts of Tripoli now appear to be under opposition control, however there are still pockets of fighting between the two sides. Across the capital and the remainder of the country, frontlines are extremely fluid and changing rapidly.
News teams have come under fire moving across Tripoli and live positions are also reported to have been fired upon. Snipers and rocket explosions also pose a threat and journalists should be aware of the possible danger of celebratory gunfire.
Earlier on Thursday, there was a firefight in the vicinity of the Corinthia Hotel, where a number of journalists had been based. There are reports that journalists were evacuated from the hotel by rebels. Some journalists are believed to have returned after the fighting stopped. At least one road nearby that was being used by news teams was temporarily inaccessible because of the fighting.
The route from Tunisia via the border at Dehiba remains the entry point for the majority of journalists from the west and those making the transit should be aware of the possibility of the security situation deteriorating without notice, with routes -- previously regarded as safe -- possibly becoming dangerous. News crews have been using the main road between Zawiya and Tripoli, but INSI urges them to exercise extreme caution.
Journalists should also be aware of uncomfirmed reports that Gaddafi has called on his supporters to use the opportunity to seize foreigners, including journalists. Armed gangs and small pockets of those still loyal to Gaddafi continue to operate.
Communication and supplies remain precarious, and INSI advises all news teams to take fuel, food and water with them.
Rebel forces have been moving towards Gaddafi's hometown of Sirte, and there are reports that they have been exchanging heavy gunfire with loyalists on the road into the city. In the town of Bin Jawad, they are also facing stiff resistance from Gaddafi supporters.
***24.08.2011. LIBYA. Libya: ICRC evacuates journalists from Rixos Hotel
Geneva (ICRC) – The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) helped journalists leave the Rixos Hotel in Tripoli today and led them to safety. The reporters had been unable to leave the hotel for several days.
"We have taken 33 journalists and two other foreign nationals from the Rixos Hotel to a safe place," said Georges Comninos, the head of the ICRC delegation in Libya. "Our recognized role as a neutral intermediary enabled us to carry out this operation. We are glad that everything went smoothly, but we remain concerned about other civilians and journalists who may find themselves in danger."
At around 4.30 p.m. local time, six ICRC staff arrived at the hotel with four vehicles and helped transfer the journalists and the two other foreign nationals to a safe location in Tripoli. They expressed joy and relief at having left the hotel.
Journalists are protected under international humanitarian law. "Media professionals are entitled to the same protection as civilians. They must be protected and respected," said Mr Comninos.
The ICRC, which operates a hotline for journalists on dangerous assignments, had been contacted by several news organizations concerned about the safety and well-being of their staff. Since the beginning of the year, the organization has received around 50 requests for help from media organizations and families of journalists.
***17.08.2011 Egypt: Military Intensifies Clampdown on Free Expression Youth Leader, Protesters Charged With ‘Insulting the Military’ (Human Rights Watch)
(Cairo, August 17, 2011) – The military prosecutor’s decision to prosecute the youth leader Asamaa Mahfouz for “insulting the military” is a serious escalation of efforts by military leaders to silence critical voices, Human Rights Watch said today.
The prosecutor has this week alone summoned both Mahfouz and Maha Abu Bakr, a lawyer, on charges related to speech protected by the right to freedom of expression. They are among a large number of protesters and other civilians facing trials in Egypt’s military courts. Civilians should not be prosecuted before Egypt’s military courts, which do not meet basic due process standards, Human Rights Watch said.
“The decision to try Asmaa Mahfouz is a major attack on free expression and fair trials, using the same abusive laws the Mubarak government used against its critics,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “The military is using her to silence potential critics, sending the message that criticizing the current military government will land them in jail.”
The Mahfouz case is the latest in a series of moves prosecuting critical expression by the military, which is increasingly setting narrower and narrower limits on what it permits, Human Rights Watch said.
Mahfouz, a former leading member of the April 6 Youth Movement, received a summons at her home on August 13, 2011, to appear before the military prosecutor the next day for questioning. The military prosecutor questioned her for over three hours about her comments on Twitter and media interviews during protests on July 23 in which she criticized the military for failing to intervene to protect protesters.
He then charged her with “calling for threats to social peace,” “spreading false information,” and “insulting the military,” but allowed her release on 20,000 Egyptian pounds ($US3,400) bail, an extremely high sum for most Egyptians. On August 16 Egypt’s official news agency MENA quoted a military justice official saying the prosecutor had decided to refer Mahfouz’s case to court on charges of insulting the military, dropping the other charges.
On August 14 the head of the military justice system, Gen. Adel Morsi, in a news release, started by affirming the important role of expression in society and then invited the public to look at Mahfouz’s Facebook profile to see for themselves “whether [her comments were] an opinion or an inappropriate violation of the law and incitement.” The comment in question, which Mahfouz posted on Twitter and Facebook, was: “If the judiciary doesn’t restore our rights then nobody should be surprised if we then see armed groups and assassinations taking place... if there is no law and no justice system, no one should be surprised.”
“Asmaa Mahfouz’s comments reflect her concerns about the need for justice and are fully protected by freedom of expression,” Stork said. “Yet the military is prosecuting her under a blatantly abusive law. This charge should be dropped immediately.”
Abu Bakr, a lawyer representing victims in the Mubarak trial and a Kifaya activist, received her summons to appear before the military prosecutor on charges of “insulting the military” on August 16. During the questioning, the prosecutor showed her video footage from the July 23 demonstration in Abbasiya, Cairo, of a protester who, the prosecutor told her, was “insulting” the military. The prosecutor dropped the charges against her when he realized the footage was not of her. Lawyer Ahmed Ragheb told Human Rights Watch that this footage was not filmed by the media, which would suggest that the military is filming protesters during demonstrations.
Military courts are currently trying numerous protesters. In an August 15 case, six protesters faced charges of “insulting the military” before a military tribunal for chanting “antagonistic” slogans about Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, the de facto ruler of the country, in addition to charges of assaulting a police officer. The military court sentenced Hassan Bahgat to six months in prison in another case, 3779/2011, for insulting the military in Tahrir square on August 6.
Military courts are also currently trying groups of protesters arrested in Cairo in late June and early August around Tahrir Square and in Alexandria on July 22. These include a group of 43 protesters arrested during a June 28 and 29 protest outside the Interior Ministry in downtown Cairo. One of them is the activist Loai Nagaty, whom military police arbitrarily arrested on June 29 on Falaky Street, near the Interior Ministry. They detained him for eight days in the military prison but then released him on health grounds. He faces charges of “assaulting a public officer” and "causing disturbance.” The next session of his trial is scheduled for August 23.
Military courts have sentenced at least 10,000 civilians since January 2011 after unfair proceedings, Human Rights Watch said. All of them should be retried before regular civilian courts.
The Military’s Red Lines The Mubarak government frequently used overly broad provisions in the penal code to crack down on legitimate criticism of the government’s human rights record or criticism of the political situation, trying editors, opposition leaders, and activists on charges of “insulting the president” or “insulting public institutions.” The military government and courts are using the same provisions.
On April 11 a military court sentenced a blogger, Maikel Nabil, to three years in prison for “insulting the military establishment,” under article 184 of the penal code, and “spreading false information,” under article 102. The evidence presented against him consisted solely of a CD with details of Nabil's blog postings and commentary on Facebook over the previous months. Nabil’s lawyers have appealed his sentence but the court has not scheduled a date to hear his appeal.
Military prosecutors have summoned at least seven activists and journalists, including Mahfouz, to question them on charges of criminal defamation after they publicly criticized the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), the military leadership, or alleged abuses by the army. The labor activist and blogger Hossam al-Hamalawy was summoned after he said on television that he held the head of the military police, Gen. Hamdy Badeen, personally responsible for acts of torture by the military police.
A member of the military leadership told Human Rights Watch in June that military prosecutors “offered [Hamalawy and the others] American coffee and discussed the different issues with them. This did not take longer than one hour.” On another occasion, on June 19, the military prosecutor summoned a journalist, Rasha Azab, and an editor, Adel Hammouda, for questioning about an article Azab had written about alleged human rights abuses by the military.
A Human Rights Watch delegation met with a member of the SCAF on June 6 and voiced concern about the chilling effect that summoning people on criminal charges has on freedom of expression generally. One of the SCAF officers at the meeting responded:
We do not question everyone for criticizing the military, we only ask those who accuse, who defame the military or those who spread inaccurate information in order to spread suspicion about the armed forces to present their evidence. We summoned four journalists only to question them about their information and their sources since [what they said/wrote] involved the behavior of the armed forces and has serious implications for the perception of the armed forces.
In his August 14 news release Morsi said that there were “many who abused freedom of expression in the media in order to promote armed militias' plans for assassinations,” referring to Mahfouz’s tweet, and to “cross the limits of freedom of expression to insult and defame the armed forces and the SCAF.” He added that the SCAF does not limit freedom of expression but only investigates what Egypt’s penal code prohibits and that the military justice system was conducting the investigation based on the jurisdiction granted by the Code of Military Justice.
The broad jurisdictional basis of the Code of Military Justice is incompatible with international human rights standards because it allows for military trials of civilians without any subject-jurisdiction limitations, Human Rights Watch said.
Penal Code Is Incompatible With International Law The United Nations Human Rights Committee, the expert body that provides authoritative interpretations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Egypt is a party, states categorically in its recently-issued General Comment No. 34, on Article 19 on Freedom of Expression, that, “States parties should not prohibit criticism of institutions, such as the army or the administration.” By this standard, article 184 of the Egyptian penal code, which criminalizes “insulting the People’s Assembly, the Shura Council or any State Authority, or the Army or the Courts,” is incompatible with international law and should be amended accordingly, Human Rights Watch said.
Egypt’s penal code includes numerous provisions that violate international law by providing criminal penalties of imprisonment for “insulting” public officials and institutions, including the president (article 179), public officials (article 185), “foreign kings or heads of state” (article 180), or foreign diplomats (article 182). The Human Rights Committee further elaborated in General Comment 34: “The mere fact that forms of expression are considered to be insulting to a public figure is not sufficient to justify the imposition of penalties, albeit public figures may also benefit from the provisions of the Covenant. Moreover, all public figures, including those exercising the highest political authority such as heads of state and government, are legitimately subject to criticism and political opposition.”
“Egypt needs to urgently review the legal framework which Mubarak used for years to silence his critics,” Stork said. “It is unacceptable for the military to be using these laws to clamp down on speech, especially as elections near.”
***01.08.2011. LIBYA: NATO LAUNCHES AIRSTRIKES AT MEDIA OUTLET
Three unidentified journalists were killed and 21 others injured in Tripoli after North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) warplanes bombed three transmission towers on 30 July in an effort to take Libyan state television off the air. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) have condemned the attack.
According to NATO, "TV was being used as an integral component of the regime apparatus designed to systematically oppress and threaten civilians and to incite attacks against them. [Libyan leader Muammar] Qaddafi's increasing practice of inflammatory broadcasts illustrates his regime's policy to instill hatred amongst Libyans, to mobilise its supporters against civilians, and to trigger bloodshed."
In a letter to NATO, CPJ has asked for a more detailed explanation for the motivation behind the attack, saying "we are concerned any time a media facility is the target of a military attack. Such attacks can only be justified under International Humanitarian Law if the media facility is being used for military purposes or to incite violence against the civilian population."
CPJ is asking for evidence of specific broadcasts intended to incite violence. The letter also asks if more airstrikes are being planned since the initial strike failed to halt state television.
IFJ says the bombing is in contravention of UN Security Council resolution 1738, which condemns attacks against journalists, clearly establishing media equipment and installations as civilian locations that should not be considered a target for military reprisals.
"Our concern is that when one side decides to take out a media organisation because they regard its message as propaganda, then all media are at risk," said IFJ. "In conflict situations, international law is clear that unarmed journalists cannot be treated as combatants, irrespective of their political affiliations."
The Director-General of UNESCO, Irina Bokova, has also spoken out against the strike on Al-Jamahiriya and its installations: "The NATO strike is also contrary to the principles of the Geneva Conventions that establish the civilian status of journalists in times of war even when they engage in propaganda."
***28.07.2011. Freedom of opinion and expression – how far the protections go: the UN Human Rights Committee
GENEVA – Blasphemy laws, “memory” laws, laws on such matters as treason, counter-terrorism, lese majeste, desacato, defamation of the head of state, the protection of honour of public officials…the UN Human Rights Committee today share with the media its new General Comment on the rights to freedom of opinion and expression which sets out just how far such restrictions on these fundamental human rights can go.
“This constitutes the most authoritative interpretation of one of the most challenged and sensitive topics in international human rights law,” said committee member Michael O'Flaherty, who guided the General Comment through the Committee.
“It is a comprehensive response to numerous requests from lawmakers, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, rights defenders and even journalists asking for clarification on many of the issues covered by the rights to freedom of expression and opinion.”
Among other issues, the Human Rights Committee states in its General Comment that freedom of expression protections extend to new media and information platforms. It also offers the most comprehensive analysis yet in international human rights law of a right of access to information held by public bodies.
***25.07.2011. OPT. The Palestinian Center for Development & Media Freedom (MADA): 113 attacks on the freedom of the press in the first half of this year in oPt
Ramallah - Attacks on journalists continue to hinder their work and endanger their lives. In the first 6 months of 2011 MADA has monitored 113 violations on press freedom in the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt), including 68 committed by the security services of the West Bank and Gaza and 45 committed by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF).
Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) continue to defy international standards of human rights law by supressing the work of Palestinian journalists in addition to causing frequent bodily harm. Despite however the brutality of IOF attacks, for the first time in over three years Palestinian Security Service attacks have surpassed their numbers.
Total The Palestinian side Israeli occupation The violator Year 122 35 87 2008 87 33 54 2009 98 19 79 2010
Analysis has shown that the increase in Palestinian Security Service violations is proportionate to the increased number of youth rallies, demanding an end to the internal Palestinian political divisions, and their coverage by journalists, which began and have continued since 15 March 2011. 30 violations committed by Palestinian Security Services against journalists were committed in March alone, with the majority occurring in the Gaza Strip.
The Murder of Vittorio Arrigoni - A Crime that Shocked the Palestinian Community
The most serious and heinous violation of the past year came with the brutal murder of freelance Italian journalist and activist Vittorio Arrigoni by an armed militant group in the Gaza Strip.
"The body of Arrigoni was found on the morning of Friday 16/4/2011, in an abandoned house north of the Gaza Strip. The armed group had announced kidnapping him the day before his death, and demanded in a video the release of detainees from the" Salafist jihadi group "of the security services of the Hamas Government in two days, but they had to kill him before the end of the announcement deadline."
Despite the passing of more than three months the circumstances and motive of the crime are still unknown. The Hamas government of Gaza has not released the official report of its investigation following a raid that ended with the suspect Abdel-Rahman Mohammad Breizat throwing grenades at his two accomplices before turning a gun on himself.
Arrigoni - who was granted Palestinian citizenship in honour of his solidarity activities - was one of the most active individuals in the Palestinian solidarity movement. Arrigoni lived in Gaza and aided its people for 3 years before his death and through his writings and participation in numerous international solidarity and advocacy events shed light on the suffering of the Palestinian people as a result of the Israeli siege and blockade. Arrigoni was a loved member of both the solidarity and Palestinian communities with which he was unwaveringly involved.
Israeli forces committed serious violations against journalists
Despite the increased number of violations committed by Palestinian Security Services since the beginning of the year, Israeli occupation forces remain a real threat to the lives of journalists. Since January 2011, MADA has monitored a total of 49 incidences of physical attacks against journalists, including 24 IOF perpetrated attacks and 25 committed by the security services of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Below is a summary of the most brutal attacks monitored since the start of the year:
• Pal Media and German television photographer Abdul Ghani Natshe was severely injured after being struck on the hand by a rubber coated bullet then targeted with tear gas projectiles fired by Israeli forces while he was covering the weekly march in Hebron, on 25/02/2011. The injuries sustained by Natshe necessitated immediate evacuation from the scene and emergency medical treatment. • WAFA news agency correspondent Tha’er Fakousa was beaten by IOF soldiers while covering the weekly Beit Omar march in Hebron city on Saturday 5 March 2011. The beating caused contusions and also caused his camera to break, Fakousa then required hospitalization after he lost consciousness when soldiers fired tear gas projectiles at him. • Freelance photographer Mahfouz Abu Turk was attacked by the IOF whilst covering clashes between the IOF and Palestinians in Silwan on 25 March 2011. Abu Turk required treatment at Almaqased hospital after a gas projectile thrown by IOF solders struck his left eye causing abrasions and burns. • al-Bayader al-Siyas magazine correspondent Muhammad al-Madhoun sustained severe head injuries following an Israeli military strike in the Gaza Strip. In a statement to MADA, al-Madhoun said that on the night of the 7th he was in his cousin’s home when Israeli’s shelling began. Because of the severity of his head wounds al-Madhoun had to be taken for immediate treatment to Shifa’ Hospital where he underwent emergency surgery. • Israeli Occupation Forces opened indiscriminate fire on the participants of a peaceful demonstration in commemoration of al-Nakba. Dozens of unarmed civilians suffered moderate to severe injuries, including freelance photographer Mohammad Othman (25 years). Othman was covering the March of Return, proceeding towards the Beit Hanoun crossing in northern Gaza Strip when Israeli Occupation Forces began firing live bullets at demonstrators. Osman was hit with live rounds to his chest and right hand and had to be evacuated to Kamal Adwan hospital for emergency treatment before being transferred to Shifa Hospital for surgery. Othman is currently suffering from paraplegia and is receiving physiotherapy in preparation for his transfer to a specialist medical center in Jordan. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has stated that the Palestinian National Authority will cover all the costs of his treatment. • Israeli Occupation Forces attacked APA Agency photographer Najih Al-Hashlamoun while covering clashes between Israeli occupation forces and residents of the Shalalah neighbourhood in the city of Hebron. Al-Hashlamoun reported that he was filming Israeli soldiers firing tear gas at demonstrators from the gate of one of the houses, and was standing away from demonstrators when he was struck by a rubber-coated steel bullet, wounding his left foot. Al-Hashlamoun went to the Hebron public hospital, where staff found he was suffering from severe contusions and swelling.
Decline in the number of violations in the past three months
An improvement in freedom of expression has been seen in the last three months (April-June) in comparison with earlier in the year. This decline can be attributed in part to the signing of the Fatah-Hamas reconciliation agreement on 4 May 2011, which has allowed for the return of Palestine TV broadcast from the Gaza Strip, and and Al-Aqsa TV from Ramallah.
Despite this welcome improvement, more steps need to be taken to ensure the safety and respect of journalist’s rights in the occupied Palestinian territories. The journalists in region had previously paid a high price for the political division, where the number of violations increased dramatically and self-censorship was enhanced, that’s had very negative impact on the level of Palestinian media.
Conclusion and recommendations:
Freedom of opinion and expression is guaranteed under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Palestinian basic law, however because of the political situation journalists still struggle to operate freely and safely within the Occupied Palestinian Territory
Since the beginning of the year journalists have faced numerous incidences of harassment, humiliation and abuse while trying to perform their work by both Israeli occupation forces - who never miss an opportunity to suppress journalists and prevent them from documenting current events and violations against the Palestinian people - and the Palestinian security forces in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The unrest and calls for unity which escalated in March caused a steep increase in the violations against journalists by Palestinian Security Services, particularly in the Gaza Strip, during that period.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) reiterates its condemnation of all violations committed against journalists regardless of type or perpetrator, and calls once again upon the international community to apply serious pressure on Israeli occupation authorities to end their aggression against journalists, which both limit their ability to perform their professional duty and cause a very real threat to their physical and psychological wellbeing.
In regards to the Palestinian Authorities, MADA calls upon the security services of the West Bank and Gaza Strip to end their attacks against journalists, and in particular, end their campaigns of harassment through repeated summons for investigation. Since the beginning of this year 14 journalists have been interrogated. MADA additionally urges the Hamas government to fully disclose all of the evidence obtained regarding the murder of Vittorio Arrigoni so his family and friends may finally have closure on his tragic death and begin the process of healing.
The Center also wishes to reiterate the necessity for those responsible for violations to be held accountable, and suitable mechanisms to be employed by which journalists can receive compensation and justice for the violations they suffer. ----------------------- For more information: Riham Abu Eita Coordinator of Public Relations riham@madacenter.org www.madacenter.org 00970 2 2976519
***15.07.2011. SYRIA. Silencing global coverage, Syria detains, expels reporters (CPJ)
The Syrian government has detained a local journalist who contributes to pan-Arab news outlets and expelled an international reporter, according to news reports, continuing a crackdown designed to silence global news coverage of the nation's political crisis.Omar al-Assad, a Syrian online journalist and blogger who works for multiple news organizations, was detained on July 3, according to local and regional news outlets. His condition and whereabouts are unknown. Al-Assad contributes to the Lebanese daily As-Safir, the pan-Arab daily Al-Hayat, and the broadcaster Al-Jazeera, news reports said.
Maarten Zeegers, a Dutch national who writes for the Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad and the Belgian Flemish-language daily De Standaard, was detained on Monday in Damascus when he went to renew his residence permit, Radio Netherlands Worldwide reported. Zeegers was informed his name was on a list of "undesired foreigners," he told the radio station. He said he was held for about five hours before being expelled to Turkey.
Zeegers, who had been living in Syria for two and a half years, had been studying Islamic jurisprudence at Damascus University and anonymously writing news reports for the two newspapers. Zeegers' articles were labeled as having been written by a "staff writer" in an effort to obscure his identity and prevent authorities from harassing him. Since mid-March, when civil unrest erupted throughout the country, the government has expelled more than a dozen international journalists, leaving a void in global news coverage, CPJ research shows.
"The Syrian authorities are systematically detaining local journalists and expelling foreign reporters in a ruthless attempt to stifle coverage of political protests," said CPJ Middle East and North Africa Program Coordinator Mohamed Abdel Dayem. "We are concerned for the wellbeing of Omar al-Assad who has disappeared into the black hole of the Syrian security apparatus. We call on the government to release him immediately."
***30.06.2011. GAZA - IFJ Welcomes Israel U-turn on Warning to Media over Gaza Aid Flotilla
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today welcomed the decision of the Israeli Government to reconsider the warning to slap a ten year ban on foreign reporters who plan to board the new aid flotilla bound for Gaza ,in defiance of the blockaded imposed by Israel. The decision also threatened to seize journalists’ equipment. The government announced on Monday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered a review of the measure after widespread criticism in media circles and representation from the Journalists’ Association in Jerusalem (JAJ), a branch of the IFJ affiliate in the country, the National Federation of Israeli Journalists (NFIJ). “We welcome the review of the measure and urge the government to restrain from any action against media covering the event,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “We should not have the repeat of last year’s heavy handed intervention of Israeli navy who failed to distinguish between journalists and activists. Our members in Israel are to be commended for their staunch defence of the rights and safety of journalists now just as they acted with speed to assist colleagues caught in violent clashes aboard the first Gaza aid flotilla.” According to media reports, the Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon said that senior government officials were unaware of the warning which was issued on Sunday by the head of the Government’s press office, Oren Helman, to media organisations. The Deputy Prime Minister reportedly told media that the government is anxious to avoid clashes with media. The warning provoked an outcry among journalists’ organisations led by the Foreign Press Association in Israel which described it as "a chilling message that raised questions about Israel's commitment to freedom of the press.” In a statement, the Journalists’ Association in Jerusalem called on the Government of Israel to cancel the decision to punish journalists who will be on board the second Gaza flotilla. The JAJ also requested Prime Minister Netanyahu to order the Israel Defence Forces to enable free coverage of the event. Last year, the IFJ condemned the brutal attacks on civilians, including journalists, by Israeli forces in the assault on a flotilla that tried to breach the military blockade of the Gaza coastline in Palestine. One media staff was among the nine people killed by Israeli soldiers during the raid and many journalists were detained and had their equipment confiscated by Israeli authorities. The JAJ coordinated the IFJ efforts to recover the equipment.
***22.06.2011. YEMEN.IFJ Warns Official Media Management in Yemen over Plans to Sack Journalists
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today joined its affiliated organisation in Yemen, the Yemeni Journalists Syndicate (YJS) in warning the management of Yemeni State Television that massive sackings of journalists who defied orders to censor reporting on recent anti-government protests will not go unchallenged.
The warning follows the revelation of a memo sent by the Yemeni Television board to the managing director, Abdallah El Harazi, including a list of some 30 journalists who should be fired on the grounds that they allegedly supported the uprising.
“The Yemeni Television management is trying to make our colleagues scapegoats because they refused to compromise their professional ethics,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “We stand by their side and support our affiliate’s defence of journalists’ freedom from undue interference from politicians of all sides.”
According to the JYS, the Yemeni TV board instructed the director to take disciplinary measures, including dismissals, against media personnel suspected of supporting the protests. The memo also called for denying these employees access to the television premises as well as withholding their wages and benefits entitlements.
The JYS has condemned the action against journalists at Yemeni Television and other official media, vowing to protect their rights and interests.
The news of the campaign against journalists working for state controlled media coincides with reports of a vigilante group in Yemen which has threatened attacks on media that do not support Yemeni President Saleh.
The so-called ‘Revenge Brigades to protect Yemen and President Saleh’ warned that they will assassinate President Saleh’ opponents and attack newspapers, online website and media connected to members of the political coalition in Yemen, the Al Liqa al Mushtarak.
The group claimed the responsibility for breaking into the weekly “Al Adwa al Mustaqilah” newspaper and beating its staff last Tuesday. It said this was a warning from the ‘Brigades’ to all newspapers and websites supporting the revolution and threatened to assassinate and bomb all opposition newspapers and reporters of foreign Television stations.
“We condemn this vigilante attacks on media and hold Vice President Abed Rabbo Mansour al-Hadi and his government responsible for the safety of journalists in Yemen,” added Beth Costa, IFJ General Secretary. “They have to shoulder their responsibility, reign in and disband these violent groups.”
***14.06.2011. PAKISTAN. Two journalists among 36 killed in Peshawar blast (see update and safety tips below) PESHAWAR: Khyber Union of Journalists has strongly condemned the suicide attack in Peshawar that killed two journalists among 36 other people and injured over hundred including five media persons. A minor blast took place at a local restaurant in the Khyber Super Market in the military cantonment area at 11.45 pm on the night between Saturday and Sunday. Hearing the bang, the people, media persons and police rushed to the spot, when a suicide bomber on a motorbike struck causing huge losses. Located just next to the Army Flats, the area is dominated by newspaper offices. Office of The News, Geo television, Daily Times, Pakistan Today, Khyber News, Akhbar-e-Khyber, Kawish television network, Independent News Pakistan, Online news agency, NNI news agency, Frontier Star, Afra Tafreeh magazine and others. The journalists, who work in the nearby offices and reside there as well, rushed to the spot and two among them lost their lives, while five others injured. The deceased included Asfandyar Khan, who worked with different media organizations and had recently joint Akhbar-e-Khyber, and Shafiullah, a young graduate, who had recently joint The News, International as a trainee reporter. The injured were Safiullah Mehsud, bureau chief Dunya News, Barakatullah Marwat, sub-editor, The News International, Mohammad Tufail of The News, Hashim Ali of Khyber News and Sheheryar and Riaz of Akhbar-e-Khyber. The injured were, however, in stable condition after receiving first aid. In a press statement President Khyber Union of Journalists Arshad Aziz Malik and Yousaf Ali strongly condemned the incident and urged the government to take steps for protection of the media people. They said that this was the second incident in the past one month exactly at the same area where journalists were targeted. On May 10, they said, Nasrullah Afridi was attacked in his own car at the same location. They informed that some of the newspaper and television offices had received threats of attack and the employees working there have been asking their management repeatedly to shift the offices from the area but to no avail.
Yousaf Ali General Secretary Khyber Union of Journalists
15.06 UPDATE PAKISTAN
The young Shafiullah is still in critical condition. He has got 70 percent of his body burnt. He has been shifted to a burn center near pindi as unfortunately we don't have any burn unit here in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Let's pray for his recovery. Also let me inform you that yesterday Khyber Union of Journalists convened a meeting of all the bureau chiefs of the broadcast media here in Peshawar to adopt some SOPs for the media staff that works in field. below are the points, which we finalized. we would send them to all our colleagues and media owners and editors with the strong urge to strictly follow them as the situation has gone the worst here...
Khyber Union of Journalists convened a meeting of the bureau chiefs of all the television channels to finalize standard operation procedures (SOPs) for the field staff to minimize risk. Chaired by Arshad Aziz Malik, president KhUJ, the meeting was attended by president Peshawar Press Club Saiful Islam Saifi, Abdullah Jan of Geo TV, Jamshed Baghwan of Express TV, Zahir Shah Sherazi of Dawn TV, Waqas of AVT Khyber, Iqbal Khattak of Daily Times and Yousaf Ali, general secretary Khyber Union of Journalists. Safiullah of Dunya News could not attend the meeting because of the injuries he had sustained in the June 11 blast. Shokat Khattak of Samaa, Ziaul Haq of ARY and Fakhar of Aaj were out of the town, they however committed to follow strictly whatever decided by the meeting. The meeting thoroughly discussed the threats faced by journalists and finalized safety tips. The safety tips are as follow:
Do go closer to the spot - Use zoom cameras - Check the distance from where your camera can zoom and cover an incident from that distance - Check the surrounding buildings - If there is any tall, but safe building in the nearby location, go to its rooftop to cover have a better footage - Use of safety equipment should be made compulsory - The organizations must provide safety equipment - Take precautionary measures as soon as you come to know about a happening - Take bullet proof jacket, helmet, etc. - The bullet proof jackets and helmets should be there in vehicle. Locally manufactured safety jackets can also be used - Do have first aid box in your vehicle - First aid training should be made compulsory for the entire field staff - At the spot avoid going near a crowd - Media people themselves should avoid standing in group - DSNGs and other vehicles should be parked at the maximum possible distance from the spot - DSNG guards/drivers should keep an eye on their vehicles and surroundings - Minimum distance from spot for covering an incident should be determined in consultation with the bomb disposal unit - Never go beyond that distance - Be cooperative and polite at the spot with the security personnel as well as common people - Never violate security forces’ guidelines - Field staff should not be forced by their bosses for covering a specific incident that may cause some risk to them - Willingness of the field staff should be sought before sending them for coverage - Avoid going out of the city jurisdiction after 10 in night - Life insurance of the field staff should be ensured - The organizations must arrange life insurance of the staff - Efforts should be made at individual and union level to press the organizations to ensure insurance of the journalists and other media workers - Trainees should never be allowed to go to conflict zones, risky areas, as they are neither registered with their organizations nor properly trained for the situation - DSNGs and other vehicles should be plain-colored instead of having prominent colors and logos - Prominence as media people should be avoided - Identification signs and boards should be used only at the time of the need - Apart from news collection somebody from the office should remain in constant touch with the field staff - Avoid rumors mongering
How to implement These tips should be emailed repeatedly to the staff and management with attractive messages - Informal awareness sessions should be held with the field staff - Alert messages should be sent to the field staff - Give proper space to the safety tips on the union’s web-page
***30.05.2011. GEORGIA. Independent Association of Georgian Journalists deeply concerned over the violence against journalists in Tbilisi
Independent Association of Georgian Journalists, member of IFJ, is deeply concerned over the violence against journalists in Tbilisi. On May 26, during the opposition rally, journalists were beaten by police, many of them were detained.
Journalists representing different media channels were covering anti-government protests that have started on May 21. The police fired tear-gas and rubber bullets and used batons to disperse the protesters. Journalists were verbally and physically attacked. Cameras and video cameras were seized or destroyed. And some reporters were arrested without justification.
Violence against journalists was recorded from on May 22-26 in Tbilisi and Batumi. Reporters were threatened from both sides: Anti-governmental protesters and Georgia’s Special Forces.
Netgazeti journalist Nino Kakhishvili was detained by policemen in the Tbilisi Main Police Department. After the May 26 raid the riot policemen took Kakhishvili out of an ambulance vehicle and took her with other detained to the Main Police Department.
Camera was seized by riot policemen from Netgazeti editor Nestan Tsetskhladze also. According to Tsetskhladze her camera was damaged during the police raid.
According to the Internet television Palitra TV, early morning May 26, during the raid of the protest rally in Rustaveli Avenue the riot policemen broke one camera and seized another from the Palitra TV cameraman Avtandil Surmava. Flip-cameras have also been seized from Mediapalitra journalists.
A RIA Novosti said, it’s correspondent Andrei Malyshkin was beaten and detained by Georgian riot police on Thursday while covering mass opposition protests.
Journalists of the Asaval-Dasavali newspaper have been severely injured during the last night riot police raid. Beka Sivsivadze has been shot several times with rubber bullets in the back. Giorgi Mamatsashvili was beaten with rubber truncheons; he has trouble moving himself. Pictures of insured bodies were published on front pages of newspapers next day.
According to the journalists later they were released by help from a journalist of one of the "governmental TV-channels."
Journalist of Guria News newspaper Nato Gogelia was physically and verbally abused during the dispersal of protest rally on Rustaveli Avenue in the early morning of May 26.
Several police officers held the journalist, removed the memory card from the photo camera and broke it, they also damaged the camera.
News agency Expressnews said that on May 26 during raid at the protest rally at Rustaveli Avenue a correspondent of the agency Ana Gabulia was detained; she was released in the morning.
On May 22 late night incident that took place in the Kostava Street, when the protesters insulted physically and verbally the itv.ge journalist Nino Kekelia and cameraman Irakli Khizanishvili and damaged the video camera.
May 22 Netgazeti journalist Tamaz Kupreishvili was hit in the stomach with a flag-stick by Anzor Bitsadze, son of the former chairman of Georgian parliament Nino Burjanadze when he was trying to get a comment from Burjanadze on the incident taken place in front of the public broadcaster building.
News agency Interpressnews reported May 22 that an unidentified person in civil clothing took away the video-recording of the clash that took place at the Kostava Avenue in front of the public broadcaster building from their correspondent.
In Batumi, Eter Turadze said in a telephone interview that up to 20 policemen did not allow her to leave the Ajara TV-Station territory, claiming the reason for her own safety.
Amnesty International says that during a May 26 demonstration Georgian police clubbed unarmed and peaceful demonstrators and fired rubber bullets and tear gas at bystanders and journalists. Some 90 people have been detained.
An OSCE statement says at least 10 reporters were verbally and physically abused by police officers. Some were detained for questioning; others had their press cards taken away, and their equipment damaged or confiscated.
In a letter to Georgian Foreign Minister Grigol Vashadze, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Dunja Mijatovic, said: "The fact that the police would abuse, detain and question reporters engaged in their professional duties is worrisome."
Independent Association of Georgian Journalists is demanding unbiased and urgent investigation of violence against journalists. Association believes that people who prevented professional activity of media representatives must be adequately punished. Freedom of media must be guaranteed and respected. At the same time, IAGJ is concerned over polarization of Georgian media. Unfortunately majority of TV channels are divided into anti-governmental and pro-governmental groups. This is damaging the main principles of media – to be independent and unbiased.
***26.05.2011. BAHRAIN. IFJ Condemns Brutal Assault of Journalist by Police in Bahrain
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today joined its affiliate in Bahrain, the Bahrain association of Journalists (BJA) in condemning the savage beating and inhuman treatment of reporter Nazeeha Saeed who was arrested on 22 May over the story she had filed about the repression of anti-government protesters. The female reporter, who was covering the uprising for France24 and Radio Monte Carlo in the of Douar el loulou area , suffered severe injuries at the Rafa police station where she was badly beaten by her interrogators. She also bore torture marks, according to the reports. “We are appalled by this senseless and cruel treatment of a working journalist and we urge the Bahraini authorities to hold accountable the officers involved,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “The brutal behaviour of security forces towards Saeed shows there is no end to media repression in Bahrain and the world must make it clear that these gross violations of peaceful protesters’, women’s and journalists’ rights will not go unpunished.” Media reports say that Saeed was summoned to the Rafa police for questioning over her report on the death of Ali Abdelhassan who was allegedly killed by security forces during the anti-government protests of 17 February 2011. She was detained for 12 hours during which she reportedly was savagely beaten up and tortured. After her release, the French consulate arranged for the journalist to receive medical treatment in France due to the gravity of her condition. The BJA has also called for a full investigation into the allegations of torture and requested from the authorities a copy of the complaint made by the reporter, stressing the need for transparency and independence in the investigation in this case. The IFJ has accused the Bahraini government of widespread intimidation and systematic harassment against journalists which have already led to the arrests and sackings of at least 68 media personnel in the country since the start of the protests for political reforms. The Federation is taking part in a protest visit to the embassy of Bahrain in Brussels today. The protest, jointly organised by the IFJ, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), Education International (EI) and the Belgian trade unions ACV/CSV, ABCC/FGTB and ACLVB/CGSLB. The organisers will deliver a letter calling, among other measures, for the immediate release of all detained trade unionists, teachers, journalists and workers as well an end to all harassment against trade unions leaders and activists and respect for press freedom.
***19.05.2011. BAHRAIN. IFJ Calls for End to Intimidation Campaign against Journalists in Bahrain
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the widespread intimidation campaign targeting journalists who work for newspapers which are critical of the Bahraini government. The IFJ accuses the authorities of systematic harassment of media in the wake of recent anti-government protests and says that at least 68 journalists working for two leading Bahraini newspapers, Al Wasat and Al Bilad, have been singled out for sacking, arrests and charges for treason. Others were forced into exile to escape arrest in the on-going clampdown. “There is an appalling campaign to silence dissent in Bahrain and journalists have become the prime targets,” said Jim Boumelha. “The authorities are resorting to interference in media affairs and blatant intimidation to control information and stifle independent reporting. This must be exposed and resisted.” Reports say that the Bahraini authorities have embarked on a hunt of the government’s critics and arrested several journalists, on allegations of betraying the country. One report on the media crackdown in Bahrain entitled ‘ Journalists in Bahrain: The murder of Free Speech and the Siege of Freedom’ says that those arrested include the Al Wasat reporter Haidar Mohammad and blogger Zakariya Al Oushayri who is reported to be one of the two journalists who died while in detention. More journalists were sacked from their jobs after management of public and private media in Bahrain, particularly Al Wasat and Al Bilad newspapers, came under severe political pressure, including banning advertising in Al Wasat, to get rid of staff members who opposed political interference. Senior journalist Mansour Al Jamry, editor –in-chief of Al Wasat and his colleagues Walid Nuwayhid, the paper’s editing manager and Akil Mirza, member of the Bahraini Journalists Association (BJA), an IFJ affiliate, lost their jobs in this campaign which affected at least 68 media staff, according to the report. Mansour will go on trial this week along with three other senior staff charged with publishing false information about the police crackdown, a charge which carries a one-year prison sentence, media reports say. The IFJ is deeply concerned by the situation of the Bahraini journalists who have been caught up in this crackdown, whether they are in detention, awaiting trial or on the run in exile and calls on the government to rescind all measures which violate the rights and the independence of media. “We urge the authorities to re-establish the climate of respect for press freedom which the right of the public to accurate information requires, “added Boumelha. “This won’t happen unless and until all detained journalists are set free, outstanding warrants of arrest and charges cancelled, the ban on advertising in Al Wasat lifted, journalists who have been unfairly dismissed reinstated and an independent commission of inquiry set up to investigate reports of journalists’ deaths in detention.” In the meantime, the massive dismissals of workers suspected of involvement in the anti-government protests have prompted the International Labour Organisation (ILO) to warn the Bahraini government that these measures threaten to tarnish the country’s record of “progressive policies towards labour in the Gulf region”. The organisation has, however, welcomed the decision to establish a joint committee to review all dismissals. “Bahrain stands out as a country with an independent trade union movement,” ILO Deputy Director General Guy Ryder told Al-Jazeera. “The ILO is doing whatever it can with the government and other social partners to find a way forward so that people can return to their jobs.”
***14.05.2011. BAHRAIN. IFEX MEMBERS APPEAL TO WORLD LEADERS TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST RIGHTS ABUSES
Even as the King of Bahrain promises to end the state of emergency he imposed in mid-March to quell anti-government demonstrations, journalists, rights activists and opposition leaders continue to be arrested, with dozens of them hastily tried. Forty-two IFEX members and 15 partners are appealing to the international community to end their silence and demand that the Bahraini government take action against the rights abuses.
In a letter addressed to U.S. President Barack Obama, EU Vice-President Baroness Catherine Ashton and UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova, the members point to cases of journalists, bloggers and rights activists being arrested, tried in military courts and tortured, with some even dying in custody. The joint action was led by the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI), which has been engaged in campaigning and trial monitoring in Bahrain.
Founding member of "Al Wasat" newspaper, Karim Fakhrawy was declared dead on 12 April under suspicious circumstances - two days after he was arrested. On 18 May, three of the paper's senior editors are to be tried for "publishing fabricated news and made up stories . . . that may harm public safety and national interests," reports the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
Zakariya al-Aushayri, an online activist, founder and manager of the online forum Al Dair, died on 9 April under mysterious circumstances while in government custody.
Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) notes that four people have recently died in police custody, and 35 have been killed in the protests so far - in a country whose population is only 570,000.
Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja, former president of BCHR, was beaten unconscious when 15 masked men raided his daughter's home on 9 April. Human Rights Watch and BCHR report that while in detention, Al-Khawaja has been beaten to the point of being unrecognisable. He and blogger Abduljalil Al-Singace, along with 13 other detainees, were suddenly brought to trial on a dozen charges, including attempting to "overthrow and change the country's constitution and Royal rule by force" and organising rallies without permission. Seven others were tried in absentia. The trial has been adjourned until 12 May. BCHR is appealing for international observers to attend.
Current president of BCHR, Nabeel Rajab, is being prosecuted for alerting readers through Twitter about pictures of the tortured body of a man who died in custody, which the government alleges are "fabricated." He recently found out he is still banned from leaving the country.
Meanwhile, dozens of journalists have been subjected to lay-offs, arrests and threats because of their work. According to ANHRI, 30 journalists from "Al Watan", "Al Ayam" and "Al Bilad" newspapers have been laid off, while numerous reporters have been arrested or gone into hiding for fear of arrest.
Foreign reporters have had restrictions placed on their movements. This week, the authorities decided to expel German journalist Frederik Richter, the Reuters correspondent in Manama since 2008, for alleged bias in his coverage of the protests, says Reporters Without Borders (RSF). He has been given a week to leave.
"We are dismayed at the silence of governments across the world in the face of ongoing violations, which seem particularly difficult to comprehend given the widespread condemnation of human rights abuses in Libya, in the face of pro-democracy demonstrations," the members said in the letter.
The members are asking the world leaders to urge Bahraini authorities to investigate the deaths in custody; unconditionally release political prisoners; drop the politically-motivated charges against "Al Wasat"; and allow journalists and rights workers, whether local or international, to freely carry out their work.
According to "The New York Times", the King's announcement that the state of emergency will end on 1 June is a sign that Bahrain is seeking to assure banks and foreign governments that the chaos is over and that the kingdom, which depends heavily on financial business, is trying to return to normal.
"It is also a sign that the numerous arrests and rushed trials of opposition figures in military courts could be running their course. Some leading opposition figures went on trial as the announcement was being made," the "Times" said.
"This is a cosmetic step trying to show the international community that everything is back to normal when it is not," Rajab told the "Times". "I don't see it as a real initiative that will solve problems. Otherwise they would release political prisoners. The dispute is wider now than it was one month ago between the ruling elite and the people."
***13.05.2011. AFGHANISTAN.Journalistes otages en Afghanistan : 500 jours sont autant de jours de trop, selon la FIJ
La Fédération internationale des journalistes (FIJ) et son groupe européen la Fédération européenne des journalistes (FEJ) s’associent aujourd’hui aux manifestations marquant les 500 jours de captivité des journalistes français Hervé Guesquières et Stéphane Taponier détenus avec leurs accompagnateurs en Afghanistan.
« Cinq cents jours de captivité sont autant de jours de trop », a déclaré le président de la FIJ Jim Boumelha. « Nous sommes préoccupés par l’état de santé, physique et mentale, de nos collègues après tout ce temps passé. Malgré les appels de la famille, des collègues et des organisations de journalistes, rien ne filtre de la part des autorités françaises ou afghanes. Nous appelons solennellement à ce que les choses changent, vite ».
Hervé Ghesquière et Stéphane Taponier, ainsi que leurs trois accompagnateurs afghans (Mohamed Reza, Ghulam et Satar) ont été enlevés le 29 décembre 2009 dans la vallée de la Kapisa, au nord-est de Kaboul, alors qu’ils réalisaient un reportage pour France 3.
La FIJ et la FEJ redoutent la radicalisation des groupes alliés au mouvement terroriste d’Al Qaeda en Afghanistan après la mort d’Oussama Ben Laden il y a quelques jours. De concert avec leurs membres en France, le Syndicat National des Journalistes (SNJ), le Syndicat National des Journalistes-CGT (SNJ-CGT) et la section journalistes de la CFDT, les deux organisations appellent les autorités françaises et afghanes à redoubler leurs efforts de négociations pour la libération des otages et à mettre fin au silence qui règne à ce sujet.
La FIJ rappelle aussi qu’en vertu de la résolution 1738(2006) du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies, les gouvernements sont tenus de garantir la sécurité des journalistes en zones de conflit.
Elle a réitéré l’obligation des employeurs des journalistes de s’assurer que leurs journalistes soient bien préparés, formés et bénéficient de la protection nécessaire pour travailler dans les zones de conflit.
***11.05.2011. MEXICO. Violence and Press Freedom in Mexico: Still in the Line of Fire (Article 19)
ARTICLE 19’s latest report on violations of press freedom in Mexico in 2010 highlights yet again an appalling level of violence and attack perpetrated against journalists and media workers over the year, along with a marked increase in self-censorship on the part of journalists and editors. In a report released in Mexico City on the occasion of World Press Freedom day on May 3rd, ARTICLE 19 and its partner Cencos document a total of 155 attacks against journalists, media facilities and media workers. This is the third year in a row that ARTICLE 19 undertakes such an exercise, allowing it to monitor trends in Mexico and to identify key patterns and changes.
“A disturbing level of violence against journalists in Mexico has continued throughout 2010. 8 journalists were killed in 2010 simply in the exercise of their profession. It makes for a total of 44 journalists killed and 8 still missing during the period of the administration of President Felipe Calderon Hinojosa,” says Dr. Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director.
However, ARTICLE 19 found a decline in the overall number of attacks against journalists. There were 155 attacks in 2010 down from 244 in 2009. This does not reflect significant improvement in the situation for media workers in Mexico. Instead, ARTICLE 19’s and CENCOS’ research finds that this decline was linked primarily to a marked increase in self-censorship by journalists and editors, taken as a protective measure against possible future attack.
Statistical analysis undertaken by ARTICLE 19 and Cencos demonstrates that the majority of the attacks against journalists were carried out by government agents. In 49.03% of the assaults, the evidence pointed directly to government agents whereas 26.45% of the assaults could be attributed to organized criminal groups. Nevertheless, since 2009 there has been a drop in the proportion of these assaults committed by government authorities, down from 65% to 49.03%.
The research also found that there had been 6 cases of kidnapping of journalists in 2010, up from just one in the previous year. Five of these victims in 2010 worked for national media companies, including Televisa and Multimedios, and were covering local issues of national interest.
The report on the state of freedom of the press in 2010 also includes for the first time an index of the most dangerous states for journalists in the country which are found to be Guerrero, Michoacan, Coahuila, Tamaulipas, Chihuahua, Nuevo Leon and Sinaloa. Attacks in these states represented 41.9% (65) of all attacks nationwide and included 8 homicides, and 13 violent attacks against media workers.
***04.05.2011. WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY 2011: 21ST CENTURY MEDIA - NEW FRONTIERS, NEW BARRIERS (IFEX)
Last month, Egyptian blogger and activist Maikel Nabil Sanad was sentenced to three years in jail for insulting and publishing false news about the military. His crime was writing a recent blog post that criticised the lack of transparency in the military.
This month, more than 800 participants from around the world are converging in Washington, D.C., to explore the idea that just as new media is being used to promote freedom, regimes are creating ways to suppress online voices. The occasion is UNESCO's World Press Freedom Day, held annually on 3 May, and the theme this year is "21st Century Media: New Frontiers, New Barriers". Many IFEX members are in attendance.
"We enjoy unprecedented opportunities for expression thanks to new technologies and media. More and more people are able to share information and exchange views, within and across national borders. This is a blessing for creativity, for healthy societies, for including everyone in new forms of dialogue," said UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, and Irina Bokova, UNESCO Director-General, in a joint statement.
In a new report for 3 May, ARTICLE 19 runs with UNESCO's theme and gives us stories of how barriers have crumbled when it comes to free speech and information flow.
For example, 2010 was the year of WikiLeaks, which "revolutionised transnational whistleblowing," said ARTICLE 19. Yes, Twitter was used to organise protests in Tunisia and Egypt, but ARTICLE 19 also points to a group of journalism students in a favela in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, who used Twitter to tell the world that 42 people died in a recent drug raid. @vozdacomunidade provided the only reporting from within the favela.
Thanks to new media, "outrage and embarrassment spread in equal measure, corruption is magnified, people-power amplified, and governments fall," said ARTICLE 19.
But at the same time, "many governments, fearful of this lack of control, are trying hard to restore or fortify barriers to trace, block, target and censor those who champion the truth," said ARTICLE 19. Its report also highlights cases of governments fighting back, from the authorities banning YouTube in Turkey to controlling mobile phone ownership in North Korea.
In a special World Press Freedom Day report, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) assessed the 10 prevailing strategies for online oppression and named which countries lead the way. The techniques go well beyond web censorship. There's state-supported email designed to take over journalists' personal computers in China, the shutting down of anti-censorship technology in Iran, monopolistic control of the Internet in Ethiopia, and carefully timed cyber-attacks on news websites in Belarus.
CPJ says what is most surprising about the 10 online oppressors is not who they are - they are all nations with long records of repression - but how swiftly they adapted old strategies to the online world, like Syria jailing online writers, and violence against bloggers in Russia. As of 1 December, 69 journalists whose work appeared primarily online are in jail, constituting nearly half of all journalists in prison, reports CPJ.
According to Human Rights Watch, Nabil's three-year sentence may be the worst strike against free expression in Egypt since the Mubarak government jailed its first blogger, Kareem Amer, for four years in 2007. The sentence is not only severe, but it was imposed by a military tribunal after an unfair trial.
A new coalition of rights groups in Egypt, including the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI) and the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS), hopes the transitional government will break with these kinds of military trials and other repressive practices of the past. The National Coalition of Media Freedom is using the occasion of World Press Freedom Day to unveil a "Declaration of Media Freedom" - its vision on how to develop and liberate the Egyptian media.
Preparing a defence is the right thing to do, according to Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, especially as we savour recent advances. "For the moment, the forces of freedom have the upper hand. But vigilance is essential before the inevitable reaction," he said.
Roth is urging Facebook and Twitter to join the Global Network Initiative, a voluntary code of conduct developed by Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft in conjunction with Human Rights Watch and other nongovernmental organisations, including IFEX members CPJ, Index on Censorship and the World Press Freedom Committee. The initiative makes it easier for companies to resist demands from governments to reveal the identities of anonymous users or to block discussion of certain topics.
Sympathetic governments also have a role. "Social media companies could better resist repressive demands if acquiescence were prohibited by law," said Roth."These governments should also fund a broad range of technologies and initiatives for circumventing censorship."
"Governments might also look for creative ways to fight censorship, such as including Internet freedom in trade agreements, much as labour rights are now," he added.
On this World Press Freedom Day, "the media revolution is triggering new debates about freedom of expression, about the nature of regulation, about the balance between expression and responsibility," said the UN."We must not shy away from exploring all angles of these questions. We must all rise to the occasion and accept the responsibility of change."
Find out on IFEX's special 3 May website how IFEX members accepted the responsibility and commemorated World Press Freedom Day.
***03.05.2011. WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY. US Ambassador Donahoe Hails Importance of New Media on World Press Freedom Day, Announces Internet Freedom Fellows Program
Statement by Ambassador Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe - U.S. Representative to the Human Rights Council May 3, 2011 The theme of this year’s World Press Freedom Day – “21st Century Media – New Frontiers, New Barriers” - could not be more appropriate to the transformative crossroads in history at which we stand today. Social media users are playing a major role in the demand for democracy unfolding across the countries of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. Around the world, the Internet is a vital medium through which journalists, activists and citizens connect with each other and share stories in ways that are changing their societies. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has put it, the Internet is “the public space of the 21st Century.”
This World Press Freedom Day highlights the role of new media at a moment of great challenges but also of much hope and promise. That is why I am particularly proud to announce today the creation of a new program to highlight the innovative use of the Internet in promoting and defending human rights. In June this year, the United States Mission will invite a group of Internet Freedom Fellows to visit Geneva and Washington. The Internet Freedom Fellows will meet with key government, United Nations, and civil society representatives and participate in public discussions to demonstrate at the global level the importance of internet freedom. The Internet Freedom Fellows program follows up on Secretary Clinton’s pledge to find innovative ways to promote the use of the Internet in support of human rights. It is funded by the Department of State and managed by the U.S. Mission in Geneva in cooperation with the Institute for Media Global and Governance (IMGG), a Geneva-based NGO. Around the world people are using new media in the call for freedom, transparency and greater self determination. We must always remember that it is not the tools, but the courageous people who use them - journalists and reporters and individual citizens – who are the human voice of freedom. In recent weeks we have seen the detention of prominent activists around the world who have made bold and creative use of new media to expose problems in their own societies. On World Press Freedom, and every day, the United States stands with those exercising their universal rights and calling for democracy and greater respect for human rights. (end text)
***02.05.2011. "At this historic juncture, Governments must choose reform over repression”, state UN expert on World Press Freedom Day
The following statement was released by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Mr. Frank La Rue, on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day (3 May 2011).
We commemorate the World Press Freedom Day* this year against the backdrop of extraordinary events in the Middle East and North Africa. People from all walks of life, in particular the youth, have peacefully and collectively stood up against decades of oppression and denial of basic human rights.
I commend and stand in solidarity with these courageous individuals, including journalists, bloggers, and activists, who have risen above fear to express their legitimate grievances and to demand reforms, democracy and transparency, using at great risk their freedom of expression and new information communication technologies.
At the same time, I am deeply shocked and saddened that thousands of individuals have lost their lives, and journalists, human rights defenders and opposition leaders in particular continue to be targeted in countries such as Libya, Syria, and Yemen. I extend my condolences to the families of the victims and urge authorities to immediately stop any further bloodshed. I call on the international community to respond urgently and effectively to these human rights and humanitarian crises.
I believe that we are currently in a historic moment. Never in the history of humankind have individuals been so interconnected across the globe. Social networking platforms have given individuals the means to share and disseminate information in “real-time”, and have played a key role in the recent demonstrations. As one activist tweeted during the protests in Egypt, “we use Facebook to schedule the protests, Twitter to coordinate, and YouTube to tell the world.”
Indeed, the Internet has become an essential tool to exercise the right to freedom of expression, a topic which is discussed further in my next report to the United Nations Human Rights Council to be presented on 3 June 2011.
At the same time, the power of the Internet to awaken individuals to question and challenge the status quo and to expose corruption and wrongdoing has generated fear among the powerful. As a result, Governments are increasingly censoring information in cyberspace and, in some cases, disconnecting users from Internet access entirely.
Such censorship measures are often combined with age-old tactics of harassment and intimidation, arbitrary arrests, torture and other cruel or inhuman treatment, enforced disappearances and even killings – not only to directly silence dissent, but also to generate a climate of fear within society. I remain deeply concerned about such practices around the world, and in particular the continuing persecution of journalists, bloggers and activists covering the ongoing demonstrations.
On this World Press Freedom Day, I would like to remind all States that the strongest governments are those that allow democratic participation of citizens, and diverse views to be expressed openly. The events in the Middle East and North Africa have shown that it is never a viable long-term option to suppress the voices of the people. They have also served as a reminder that the role of the Government is to serve the people, not those in power.
I therefore call upon all Governments to choose reform over repression, to embrace diverging views, to listen to the people, and to build a strong society based on the consent of the governed, whose freedom of opinion and expression must be upheld.
(*) 3 May was proclaimed World Press Freedom Day by the United Nations General Assembly in 1993. It is a day to commemorate the fundamental principles of press freedom and to assess the state of press freedom worldwide. For further information on the Special Rapporteur’s mandate, please visit: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/opinion/index.htm For press inquiries and additional information regarding the visit, please contact Ms. Momoko Nomura (Tel: +41 22 917 9304 / email: Mnomura@ohchr.org
***02.05.2011. PHILIPPINES. Statement of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day
AS IN THE PAST, WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY 2011 is being commemorated after a year (May 2010-May 2011) of global and national turmoil.
Iraq and Afghanistan continued to occupy media attention and to subject journalists to the usual perils of covering conflict areas. Five journalists were killed in Iraq in 2010, and two in Afghanistan. And while the unrest in the Middle East and North Africa was among the unique characteristics of 2010-2011, the political crises in Egypt, Tunisia. Yemen, Bahrain, Syria and Libya did subject journalists to the same perils of being killed, threatened, harassed or abducted while doing their jobs. Four journalists were killed in Libya, two in Egypt, and several others abducted.
The Philippine media situation has resisted change despite the change of administration in July, 2010. The Ampatuan Massacre trial is continuing, but in terms of results has virtually come to a standstill, bogged down in the tedious processes involved in resolving technical issues, even as the killing of journalists has continued, with eight cases of journalists killed, of which five were work related.
The same ethical and professional shortcomings that have made the media the subject of citizen skepticism and even scorn still haunt media practice, with the performance of the media, whether print, broadcast or online, being uniformly problematic. Plagiarism was a nagging problem, together with sensationalism, lack of fairness and balance, biased reporting, and corruption. Problems related to job security, as well as the usual issues of low salaries and limited or non-existent benefits were also prominent during the May 2010 to May 2011 period.
Attempts to legislate a freedom of information act are continuing even as the 15th Congress pursues efforts to pass a right of reply law initiated by the 14th Congress despite media and press opposition.
While the Aquino administration had pledged to respect press freedom and to stop the killing of journalists, Mr. Aquino has not taken the concrete steps needed to create the conditions necessary to end the culture of impunity. Neither has he been reticent in criticizing the media, at one point accusing them of criminal behavior, later of sensationalism, focusing on his love life, and ignoring the achievements of his administration, while at the same time urging advertisers to advertise only in “responsible media organizations”.
In these circumstances, the tasks of the media advocacy and journalists’ organizations remain as urgent as ever: it is to defend press freedom in difficult circumstances through self-examination, self -regulation and reform. The process has been difficult and as glacial in pace as everything else has been in the Philippine setting, but it is essential that the effort at self criticism and self regulation for the sake of better media and the defense of press freedom are pursued with renewed vigor and commitment.
***13.04.2011. SYRIA.IFJ Raises Concerns over Arrest of Journalist amid Media Clampdown in Syria
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on Syrian authorities to release journalist Mohamad Zaid Mastou, who was arrested on 6 April in Damascus by security agents and taken to an undisclosed location.
“The manner of his arrest and the lack of information about his whereabouts raise concerns for his safety and wellbeing,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. “The Syrian regime must be in no doubt that the world is watching and this latest case of repression of press freedom will not go unnoticed.”
The IFJ has learned that Mastou, a Norwegian national of Syrian Kurdish origin, was in Syria covering the anti-government protests for the Arabic TV Al Arabiya’s website, Arabiya.net when he was arrested last Wednesday. The government agents reportedly used violence to arrest the journalist who was sitting in a cyber café in Damascus before bundling him in a car and driving away. Attempts by his family to find out where he is detained have been in vain as the authorities are refusing to provide any information thereabout.
The IFJ says the arrest of Mastou comes in the wake of a major crackdown on media in Syria as the government attempts to stifle reporting on the widespread protest movement in several cities which have led to clashes between security forces and protesters.
Media freedom organisations reported cases of threats, disappearances and arrests targeting journalists and bloggers who were covering the protests. These include Reuters producer Ayat Basma and cameraman Ezzat Baltaji who went missing on 26 March while journalists Doha Hassan, Zaher Omareen and Mohamed Dibo were arrested over the protests and remain in detention.
The IFJ calls on the international community to monitor violence against media by the Syrian authorities in a desperate attempt to resist the popular uprising demanding political changes in the region and which has already toppled regimes in Tunisia and Egypt.
“The world needs to challenge the Syrian leadership over its brutal repression of democratic debate and press freedom,” added Boumelha. “Journalists must not be scapegoats for the government’s brinkmanship.”
***12.04.2011. SYRIA. The HIGH COMMISSIONER DEEPLY CONCERNED
We are deeply concerned about reports of the intensification of killings of protestors by security forces in Syria, as well as mass arrests of human rights defenders and the harassment of journalists. A number of journalists, international and Syrian, as well as Syrian bloggers have reportedly been arrested and TV signals suspended of at least one private TV station. Syrian authorities must immediately release journalists detained for doing their jobs and to respect the right to freedom of expression.
The High Commissioner has emphasized to the Syrian authorities that the use of force against peaceful protestors has not quelled discontent anywhere in the region. We urge the authorities to take immediate action to stop the excessive use of force, particularly the use of live ammunition against peaceful protestors.
***31.03.2011. SYRIA UPDATE. The situation for journalists working in Syria continues to be extremely precarious (INSI).
Two Reuters journalists are missing in the country.
Correspondent Suleiman al-Khalidi, a Jordanian national based in Amman, is believed to have been detained by the Syrian authorities in Damascus on Tuesday.
Photographer Khaled al-Hariri, a Syrian based in Damascus, has not been in contact with colleagues since Monday. A Syrian official said authorities were working to establish what had happened to the two men.
Their disappearance follows the detention in Syria of two other Reuters journalists, television producer Ayat Basma and cameraman Ezzat Baltaji.
The two, who are both Lebanese, were released and expelled to Lebanon on Monday after being held by Syrian authorities for two days.
***26.03.2011. SYRIA - Authorities impose news blackout on crackdown in Deraa (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders strongly condemns the censorship that the Syrian authorities have imposed on national and foreign news media seeking to cover events in the southern city of Deraa. The security forces have blocked access to the city so that there is no one to witness their ruthless crackdown on the protests that have been taking place there during the past few days.
Ahmed Hadifa, a 28-year old blogger better known by the blog name of Ahmad Abu Al-Kheir, was arrested again by the security services in Damascus yesterday “because of his activities on Facebook in support of the protests in Deraa.” He was previously held for several days in February without being formally charged.
Maan Aqil, journalist, was detained yesterday after being constantly harassed during the preceding days. Mazen Darwish, the head of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression, was released last night after after being summoned for questioning on 23 March for making statements about the crackdown in Deraa and the recent wave of arrests.
Darwish had already been held for several hours on 16 March after being arrested while attending a peaceful sit-in outside the interior ministry headquarters in Damascus as an observer.
Writer and political activist Louay Hussein was also released last night after being arrested at his home on 22 March because of his online activities in support of the demonstrations and calls for reform.
The authorities blocked distribution of the leading pro-government daily Al-Watan yesterday without giving explanation although it is owned by Rami Makhlouf, a cousin of the president. Media sources blamed the move on an article headlined “The Syrian media are lying to us.” The ban was issued at 6 a.m., just after yesterday’s issue had been printed. The information ministry lifted the ban later in the day, again without any explanation.
The same newspaper had itself been criticising the international media’s coverage of the events in Deraa, accusing them of lying and insisting that everything was calm in Syria. An article in the 24 March issue questioned the peaceful nature of the protest movement and voiced support for the crackdown on the demonstrators.
Reporters Without Borders has learned that a photographer and a freelance video reporter working for Agence France-Presse and an Associated Press photographer were briefly held and roughed up while covering the demonstrations in Deraa on 22 March. Their equipment was seized and was handed back a few hours later. When the AFP journalists tried to return to Deraa the next day, their equipment was again seized. They have not yet been able to recover it.
***23.03.2011. YEMEN. IFJ Blames State Violence over Killing of Journalist in Yemen
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the use of violence which led to the killing of freelance journalist Jamal Shar’abi who was killed on Friday in Taghier Square when gunmen fired on the protesters in the capital Sana’a. “This killing is the inevitable and tragic end to a terrible seven days for media in Yemen,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “The Government bears a heavy responsibility because of its heavy handed tactics in dealing with protesters that has increased the risks for journalists.” The news of the journalist’ death followed the expulsions last week of six foreign reporters amid escalating anti-governments protest. Italian photojournalist Marco Di Lauro and his American colleague Patrick Symmes who writes for US travel magazine Outside were detained at the airport in Sana’a as they returned from visiting historic sites and the Socotra Island before being expelled from the country. In a targeted sweep on foreign reporters, four other journalists were ordered to leave -- Oliver Holmes, a stringer for the Wall Street Journal and Time, Portia Walker, a correspondent of the Washington Post, Haley Sweetland Edwards, of the Los Angeles Times and AOL News and Joshua Maricich, a contributor to various newspapers. According to the international broadcaster Aljazeera, two of its reporters were also deported on Sunday and its office in Sana’a was ransacked by attackers with police looking on. The IFJ says the attacks on media are also directed at Yemeni journalists following an attack on the offices of its affiliated organisation in the country, the Yemeni Journalists’ Syndicate (YJS) by a group of thugs who threatened to burn it down. The Federation wrote on 14 March to President Ali Abdallah Saleh of Yemen to request his urgent intervention to end systematic attacks on journalists. “The Government has declared war on media and their attacks on journalists during the unrest signals signal that they are aiming to shut down media and stifle dissent in all its forms,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “Journalists are targets and government scapegoats to cover their own failure to contain the wave of popular protest in favour of political reform. This is a dangerous and ultimately futile policy which will only lead to yet more tragedy unless it is ended now.”
***20.03.2011. IFJ Appoints Female Union Rights Campaigner from Brazil as New General Secretary (see PEC statement on PEC NEWS)
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) this weekend formally endorsed the appointment of Brazilian journalist and union activist Elizabeth Costa as the new General Secretary to replace Aidan White who is standing down at the end of this month after 24 years in the post. Elizabeth Costa is a veteran campaigner for union rights and press freedom in Latin America and has been a leading force for international solidarity in the Brazilian Federation of Journalists’ Associations (FENAJ). She emerged as the unanimous choice from a strong field of candidates who were interviewed in Brussels last month. “I welcome the appointment of Beth Costa as the new General Secretary,” said IFJ President Jim Boumelha. “This is the first time in the history of the IFJ that its General Secretary comes from outside Europe. It is also the first time that the IFJ secretariat is led by a woman. This is indeed proof of the impact of the change and recognition of the IFJ as a truly global federation of unions.” Beth Costa has a strong background in trade unionism and journalism. She worked as a Television journalist in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo for over twenty years. She also held senior positions in the FENAJ where she served as President from 1998 to 2004, becoming the first woman President of the Federation since its inception in 1946. She was also a member of the IFJ Executive Committee from 2001 to 2004. “The IFJ is in a transition to a more inclusive organisation which empowers its regions in its projects work and representation,” said Elisabeth Costa, the new IFJ General Secretary. “ I look forward to implementing the resolutions from the World Congress in Cadiz and to further strengthening the reach of the IFJ as a global voice of journalists.” The outgoing General Secretary, Aidan White, said the challenges for journalists across the globe have intensified, especially in the Middle East and called for renewed solidarity in addressing them. “The period we are now entering is a challenging endeavor but, with a new dynamic General Secretary, staff and the Executive working hand in hand, I hope very much that the IFJ will respond to show that our leadership of the global journalism is in good hands.” For more information, please contact IFJ on + 32 2 235 22 07 The IFJ represents more than 600.000 members in 125 countries
***16.03.2011. BAHRAIN. IFJ Concerned over New Media Crisis in Bahrain
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the escalation of violence against media in Bahrain after photographer Mohammed Almoukhraq was assaulted by security forces while covering anti-government protests in the capital, Manama on Sunday. Last night, the Al–Wasat newspaper headquarters were also attacked. “These incidents illustrate a crisis for media and democracy in Bahrain,” said IFJ President, Jim Boumelha. “The government must give guarantees that journalists will be able to operate freely and safely despite the Declaration of a State of Emergency.” According to Bahrain Journalists Association (BJA), an IFJ affiliate, photographer Almoukhraq was set upon on Sunday by security forces and plainclothes officers who beat him up and broke his camera and mobile phone. In a separate incident, the headquarters of the Al-Wasat newspaper in Manama came under attack last night by unknown assailants. The BJA condemned the assault on Almoukhraq and the attack on offices of Al –Wasat newspaper and demanded a thorough investigation into these incidents to hold perpetrators accountable. In a statement, the BJA leadership called on “all stakeholders to allow the press to perform its mission.” The IFJ backs the BJA demands and says the Government of Bahrain has the primary responsibility to protect journalists who are covering an increasingly violent situation. “We call on the authorities to order security forces to stop attacking journalists and to protect all media professionals from violent groups,” added Boumelha. “Journalists must not be targeted and media must not be made scapegoats for this political crisis.”
***15.03.2011. TURKEY. UN RIGHTS OFFICE CALLS ON TURKEY TO ENSURE PRESS FREEDOM AFTER JOURNALISTS’ ARREST New York, Mar 15 2011 10:10AM The United Nations human rights arm today called on Turkey to guarantee freedom of opinion and expression, voicing serious concerns at the recent imprisonment of journalists on charges of involvement in a conspiracy allegedly designed to overthrow the Government.
“If there are genuine reasons to suppose that any journalists have committed crimes outside the scope of their journalistic work, then those reasons should be transparent to the journalists themselves, to their defence lawyers and to the rest of us,” UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) spokesperson Rupert Colville told a news briefing in Geneva, noting the secrecy order surrounding the investigation.
“Otherwise, inevitably, suspicions will continue to mount that these arrests are politically motivated,” he said, calling on the Government to comply with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and ensure that journalists are not prosecuted and imprisoned because of their journalistic work and critical reporting.
On 3 March, nine Turkish journalists and writers were detained by the police on accusations of involvement in a conspiracy and detained under an order from an Istanbul court authorizing their police detention for questioning “on suspicion of being members of the Ergenekon terrorist organization and of spreading hatred and enmity among the population.”
Those detained included Ahmet Sik and Nedim Sener, two prominent journalists known for critical reporting on the Turkish criminal justice system and police. Mr. Sener works for the daily newspaper <em>Milliyet<./em>, and Mr. Sik is the co-author of a book about the Ergenekon investigation and trials.
The others detained were Professor Yalçin Küçük, a writer and a prominent critic of the governing party, who is already on trial for alleged connections with Ergenekon, and six employees of odaTV.com which is an opposition news website – Sait Çakir, Dogan Yurdakul, Mumtaz Idil, Coskun Musluk, Müyesser Yildiz and Iklim Bayraktar.
After being brought before prosecutors and formally charged with being members of the Ergenekon organisation, Mr. Sik and Mr. Sener were imprisoned on 6 March, to await trial. Mr. Küçük and four more journalists were imprisoned on the following day.
“The investigation is subject to a secrecy order, so the full details of the alleged evidence justifying the investigation and detention of the journalists is not publicly available,” Mr. Colville said. “It is not yet clear whether those detained are under investigation for their legitimate activities relating to their professional duties as journalists and broadcasters, or whether there is other evidence against them unrelated to their work as journalists.”
***14.03.2011. LIBYA. IFJ Warns over Safety as Journalist is Killed in Libya
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today warned that journalists working in Libya are facing acute dangers after an Al Jazeera cameraman was killed in what appears to have been an ambush near Benghazi, the country’s second city which is held by rebels opposed to the Government. The death was reported as a Brazilian reporter who was freed from detention in Libya urged Mohammar Gaddafi's government to release a colleague from a British newspaper who is still held. Andrei Netto, a correspondent for Brazil's Estado de S. Paulo, fears for the fate of his colleague Ghaith Abdul-Ahad, an Iraqi national working for The Guardian who was detained with him. The IFJ and its Iraqi affiliate are calling for the Gaddafi government to release the journalist who has been missing since March 6. The first media death reported in Libya is that of Ali Hassan Al Jaber who was shot while returning to Benghazi from a nearby town after filing a report for Aljazeera from an opposition protest. Unknown fighters opened fire on a car he and his colleagues were travelling in. “The crisis in Libya is intensifying and the risks to journalists are increasing by the hour,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “As government forces turn their fire on Benghazi we can expect that journalists reporting from the city will face extraordinary threats. It’s important that media act to protect their staff.” The IFJ says that media must heed warnings being issued by the International News Safety Institute which yesterday warned that journalists need to be increasingly aware of the risks to them particularly as there is antipathy towards foreign news crews. “We see hostility to journalists from all sides in this volatile situation,” said White. “All reporters are at risk, but foreign media staff face particular problems.” Last week the IFJ condemned government attacks on media which may be contributing to a hostile atmosphere. “We mourn the loss of our colleague in Benghazi and we do not want more casualties,” said White. “All sides must respect the rights of unarmed media staff that is why we urge the government to release the detained Guardian journalist and to allow all media to report freely.”
****02.03.2011. CHINA.More Crackdown Incidents; Authorities Use Force to Prevent Reporting of Jasmine Rallies (HRIC)
In an effort to stamp out any possible Jasmine Rally activities, the Chinese authorities continue to crack down on Chinese rights activists and lawyers, and resorted to violence against foreign journalists that marks an escalation of media censorship in China.
Since our February 23 press release, Human Rights in China(HRIC) has received information on 19 additional incidents of detention, house arrest, and other forms of harassment in Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Guangzhou. Many continue to be detained without any formal notification to their families of their detention.
In an episode that took place in Beijing last Sunday, February 27, which shook the foreign press community in China and the international community, police in the Wangfujing Street shopping district – a designated Jasmine Rallies location – roughed up, beat, kicked, and detained the reporters and camera crew members of at least 16 foreign media outlets, including Bloomberg, BBC, CNN, and Voice of America, and erased their photos and videos.
On Tuesday, March 1, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) defended the police actions on Sunday. At a press conference, MFA spokesperson Jiang Yu (姜瑜) said that the journalists gathering in a busy business district “affected social order” and that “the police of Beijing properly handled the incident in Wangfujing.”
The police brutality was accompanied by a series of official actions that undermine the relaxation of restrictions on foreign journalists begun at the end of 2008. In the press conference, Jiang pointed to a rule requiring that journalists seek approval from the local district authorities before reporting in the Wangfujing Street shopping district. The cited rule raises concerns about effectiveness of the 2008 regulations, which ended the requirement of official approval before foreign journalists could conduct interviews as long as they have the consent of the individuals interviewed.
On Wednesday, March 2, the BBC Chinese language service reported that more than a dozen foreign journalists in Beijing were summoned to the Public Security Bureau earlier in the day. They were told that if they attempt to cover the Jasmine Rally this upcoming Sunday, March 6, they will have problems renewing their visas. They were also told that going forward they must seek approval before reporting in certain Beijing areas, including Wangfujing, so that the streets can be kept clear of congestion.
Last week, Boxun, a major U.S.-based Chinese news website that had posted several notices about the Jasmine Rallies, announced that it had been attacked and that, “under tremendous pressure,” it would no longer post information relating to the Jasmine Rallies because “the dissemination of information about the Jasmine Rallies has brought harm to countless innocent Chinese activists and netizens.”
“The police attack on journalists who were simply doing their jobs shows that the Chinese authorities are so fearful of losing control that they are willing to pay the price of exposing themselves as thugs and bullies in photos and videos that are going around the world,” said Sharon Hom, HRIC Executive Director.
HRIC urges the international community to firmly support independence of the media in China. HRIC also urges the Chinese government to investigate the incidents of violence against foreign journalists, stop the intimidation of journalists, and release all persons taken into custody or detained as part of the efforts to prevent them from participating in the Jasmine Rallies.
***01.03.2011. YEMEN. Yemen: UN human rights chief warns against use of force
GENEVA – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay on Tuesday warned Yemeni authorities against violent repression of planned mass peaceful protests, and called on the Government to protect the rights of demonstrators and journalists under international law.
Noting reports that opposition protestors have called for a “Day of Anger” today, the High Commissioner urged all parties to exercise restraint and to respect the right to life and the freedom of peaceful assembly and expression.
“People have the legitimate right to express their grievances and demands to their Government,” she said, denouncing previous violence against protestors in Yemen which is reported to have resulted in a number of deaths and injuries.
“We have seen over and over again in the past few weeks that violent responses, in breach of international law, do not make the protestors go away and only serve to exacerbate their frustration and anger,” Pillay added.
The High Commissioner also cited reports of attacks, intimidation and harassment against local and international journalists covering the protests, as well as the arrest and detention of journalists and human rights defenders. She was particularly concerned about reports of enforced disappearances of political activists and called for immediate clarification on the whereabouts of individuals recently transferred to Sanaa from Aden.
“The authorities must release all individuals arrested for demonstrating peacefully, and human rights defenders and journalists must be protected as they carry out their important work,” she said.
“Those who are responsible for public security must understand that their actions are governed by international law and they can be held personally accountable for breaches. As a general rule, army units with no training or equipment to deal with street protests should not be deployed in cities. If there is no alternative, they should be under the tight control of qualified officers.”
Pillay also called on the opposition protestors not to resort to violence. She further expressed concern that medical personnel were allegedly denied access to treat injured protestors during earlier protests.
She called for a meaningful, broad and inclusive dialogue in Yemen to chart a way forward that respects the human rights aspirations of the people.
“Across the Middle East and North Africa, people have been taking their governments to task. The only way forward is to listen to them and grant them their due rights to participate in the decisions that deeply affect their lives,” she said.
***01.03.2011. IRAQ. Action call after “black day” for media freedom (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders urged the Iraqi government today to allow journalists to do their job freely and to make every effort to ensure their physical safety after what it called “one of the blackest days for media freedom” in the country since US combat troops left last August.
Journalists were “attacked and illegally and summarily arrested” by police and soldiers who were “supposed to protect them” during demonstrations to mark the 25 February “day of rage” in many cities, including Baghdad, Karbala, Mosul and Basra, the organisation’s secretary-general, Jean-François Julliard, said.
He urged the government to investigate all the abuses and punish those responsible as a matter of course.
Police sealed off Baghdad’s Tahrir Square, where the city’s demonstration took place, and helicopters were used to help block access. Cameramen from Al-Baghdadiya and d’Al-Sharqiya were arrested while filming security forces firing assault weapons and using tear gas to disperse protesters. A cameraman from the satellite TV station Faiha injured his hand when he was attacked by security forces. Journalist Seif Al-Khayat was run over by a police car. Police raided and searched the premises of the TV station Al-Diyar, which was covering the demonstrations from the roof of its building. Reporter Ali Al-’Ainbaki and nine technicians were arrested and the station went off the air. Two journalists from the satellite TV station Al-Sumariya, Idris Jawad and Sanan Adnan, along with cameramen Satar Muhammed Abdul and Safa Hatem, were arrested after reporting on the protest. They were accused of participating in and helping to organise it and were held for several hours at the Al-Rusafa operations centre (eastern Baghdad). Thaier Al-Sudani, a Reuters photographer, and Ahmad Al-Rubaie, of Agence France-Presse, were also arrested. Cameraman Imed Hamed, of satellite TV station Al-Hurra, and his assistant Mustafa Kazem were arrested by riot police in Baghdad and their cameras and recordings seized. After the demonstration, agents of the 11th intelligence police division burst into the Al-Taraf restaurant in central Baghdad and arrested four journalists – Hussam Serail (a reporter with Al-Sabah), Ali Abdul Sada (Al-Mada), Hadi Al-Mahdi (a presenter with Radio Demozy) and Ali Sumerian (of Al-Sabah). They were insulted and punched and then taken to division headquarters at the former defence ministry building. They were handcuffed, blindfolded, beaten and threatened for several hours before being released.
In Karbala, Reuters correspondent Mushtaq Muhammad was hospitalised with serious head injuries after a policeman clubbed him while he filmed the protests. His camera was destroyed. The provincial chief minister apologised to him and the news agency after investigating the incident. The journalist called for an example to be made of the policeman to ensure such an incident did not happen again.
Riot police in Karbala also beat and insulted crews from TV stations Afaq TV and Al-Salam TV and seized their recordings. Reporter Ahmed Hiyali, of Radio Sawa, was badly beaten by a special police unit in Mosul and prevented from covering the protests there. A colleague, Adel Sayegh, of the TV station Al-Salah A-Din, said Hiyali was repeatedly hit before being taken to the provincial assembly building.
Soldiers confiscated cameras and recordings from several journalists covering the protests in Basra. Radio Dijla reporter Mohammed Al-Jabri was insulted and also beaten with a rifle butt.
The journalist Muntazer Al-Zaidi, famous for throwing a shoe at US President George Bush in 2008, was arrested on 24 February while trying to hold a press conference in front of the Abu Hanifa mosque in Baghdad’s Adhamiyah neighbourhood. He was subsequently released.
A total of 23 journalists jointly announced on 27 February they would boycott the offices of prime minister Nuri-Al-Maliki and the Baghdad military commander in protest against the violence against journalists by the security forces and their arbitrary attempts to prevent coverage of the demonstrations. In an open letter, they demanded official apologies and an immediate halt to attacks on the media.
Gen. Qassem Atta, spokesman for the Baghdad military chief, duly apologised and said the attacks on freedom of expression were “unintentional.” In response to a question from a cameraman with the satellite TV station Turkmen Illy during a news conference yesterday, Prime Minister Maliki apologized to journalists for the violence used by the security forces and promised both sanctions and reforms.
Mohammed Al-Hamdani, a correspondent for the satellite TV station Al-Itijah, was meanwhile killed in a suicide bombing in Ramadi, the capital of Al-Anbar province (110 km west of Baghdad) on 24 February. Ahmed Abdul Salam, a journalist working for the satellite TV station Al-Aan, was wounded by the same explosion. The bombing was at the House of Culture in the neighbourhood known as 17 Tammuz, where a religious festivity was being held. The overall toll was 14 dead and 23 wounded, including the journalists covering the event.
***26.02.2011. Iraq cracks down on media; violations in Yemen, Libya Military forces rounded up journalists in Baghdad's Tahrir Square.
(AP/Karim Kadim)New York, February 25, 2011--The Committee to protect Journalists documented additional attacks today in Iraq, Yemen, and Libya as journalists tried to cover anti-government protests.
Iraqi authorities cracked down on media: Security forces stormed a satellite TV office, detained dozens of journalists, and confiscated equipment, according to local journalists and news reports. In Yemen, at least four journalists were detained today, according to local journalists, and Al-Jazeera reported that its crew was prevented from covering demonstrations in Sana'a. Libyan border patrols confiscated cameras and SIM cards of journalists entering Libya from Tunisia, according to news reports. "The media in the Middle East have long been under pressure from authoritarian governments but what we are witnessing now is a marked escalation in repression," said Robert Mahoney, CPJ's deputy director. "We are particularly disturbed that a democratically elected government such as that of Iraq would attempt to quash coverage of political protests. We call on Baghdad to honor its commitments to respect media freedom."
Security forces prohibited cameras from entering Baghdad's Tahrir Square, where there were thousands of people protesting, according to news reports and local journalists. Police confiscated tapes that reporters managed to shoot in the square, according to Al-Jazeera.
Al-Jazeera reported that dozens of journalists were detained in central Baghdad today. Four journalists for Iraqi news outlets, Husam Serail, a reporter for Al-Sabah newspaper, Ali Abdul Sada, a reporter for Al-Mada newspaper, Hadi al-Mahdi, an anchor for Radio Demozy, and Ali Sumerian, an editor for Al-Sabah, were arrested, according to news reports. They were taken to an unknown location, local journalists told Al-Sumaria News website. The journalists said "a military force raided Al-Taraf restaurant in downtown Baghdad and arrested the four journalists after beating them."
Military and security forces detained Al-SumariaNews photographers Ali Jasem and Safa Hatim, and correspondents Sinan Adan and Idriss Jawad while they were covering demonstrations in Baghdad, according to Al-Sumaria News. Anti-riot forces also raided the offices of Al-Diyar satellite TV station in Baghdad and detained 10 of its staff members for three hours, according to Al-Diyar's website. In the afternoon, anti-riot police stormed the office for a second time, prohibited the staff from entering the building, and detained at least three more employees.
Niyaz Abdulla, a correspondent for Radio Nawa and a volunteer for Metro Center, a local press freedom group, was assaulted today while covering demonstrations in Erbil. "I was on the air when a plainclothes security officer came and started threatening me," she told CPJ. The officer threatened to call over men to attack her, alluding to a potential sexual assault. "I stayed calm but it was very disturbing," Abdulla said. She added that two of her colleagues had their cameras confiscated while they were covering the demonstration.
In Karbala, anti-riot forces attacked Afaq and Al-Salam satellite channels crews, according to news reports. "They were beaten and cursed at while they were covering the march in Karbala," Jihad Jaafar, a correspondent for Afaq channel told Noun. He added that the tapes of the crews were confiscated.
In Yemen, security forces attacked an unidentified cameraman for Suhail opposition TV channel and detained at least four journalists while they were covering demonstrations in Al-Mansoura in Aden Governorate, local journalists told CPJ. Security forces detained freelance journalists Marzouq Yasin, Abdel Rahman Anis, Bassim al-Shaabi, and Fares al-Jalal, while they were covering protests in Mansoura for various websites. Security forces also prevented an Al-Jazeera crew from reaching the demonstrations near Sana'a University, the Qatar-based station reported.
In Libya, foreign journalists entering the country from Tunisia tweeted that their cameras, hard drives, and SIM cards were confiscated by border patrol guards. Paul Danahar, a BBC journalist reporting from Tunisia-Libya border, said that Suresh Kothia, "an Indian who just arrived from Libya," told him that "at the last checkpoint the Libyan army took everyone's phone SIM cards and computer hard drives to stop images of the uprising getting out." Kothia told Danahar that equipment was broken and thrown to the ground.
***15.02.2011. IRAN. IFJ Condemns New Wave of Journalists' Arrests in Iran
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today accused Iranian authorities of targeting media amid signs of solidarity in the country with protests which toppled regimes in Egypt and Tunisia. At least four journalists working for reformist newspaper were arrested last week ahead of demonstrations called by the opposition to support recent popular uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia.
"The Iranian regime is attempting to intimidate journalists out of fear for the publicity anti governments protests have had in the Middle East," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "Gagging media is further proof that the authorities are failing to heed calls for democratic change in the region."
According to the Association of Iranian Journalists (AoIJ), an IFJ affiliate, security forces arrested on Friday two journalists, Nazhat Amirabadian and Maziar Khosravi , working for Shargh, the only remaining reformist newspaper in Iran. On Sunday night, the authorities arrested Abodalah Naseri, former head of Iranian news agency(IRNA) under President Khatami's rule. Four more journalists, Omid Mohaddes, Taghi Rahmani, Meysam Mohammadi and Sadredin Beheshti Shirazi were detained early last week for questioning.
These arrests followed the call by Iranian political opposition for demonstration yesterday 14 February in solidarity with people in Tunisia and Egypt who have forced former presidents Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak to step down. Media reports say the authorities have blocked access to internet sites and started jamming satellite news channels.
The AoIJ says that at least 34 journalists remain in prison, including two women Nazanin Khosravani and Hengameh Shahidi. Khosravani faces charges of "acting against national security, propaganda against the Islamic Republic and disturbing public opinion", says the AoIJ.
The IFJ accuses the Iranian authorities of seeking to blame the media for the public opinion which has largely been critical of the leadership since the disputed presidential poll of June 2009.
"The authorities must respect journalists' independence and stop making them scape goats," added White. "It is time to release all our colleagues."
***14.02.2011. AFGHANISTAN - IFJ Praises Courage of Photojournalist Severely Wounded While Reporting Afghanistan War
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), its European group the European Federation of Journalists( EFJ) and its affiliate the Afghan Independent Journalists Association (AIJA) are shocked and saddened to learn that a British photojournalist was severely injured after stepping on a makeshift bomb in southern Afghanistan. Giles Duley, a freelance photographer associated with the Camera Press Agency in London, was on a foot patrol with Afghan and American soldiers on February 7 near the village of Sangsar, in rural Kandahar Province, when he stepped on a pressure-plate that detonated a hidden explosive charge, The New York Times reported today. Duley, 39, suffered multiple amputations as a result of the blast, losing one leg below the knee, one leg above the knee and his left arm was severed above the elbow, the report said. He also suffered a range of superficial wounds and a finger on his right hand was fractured. The photojournalist was working alongside soldiers from the 1st Squadron, 75th Cavalry Regiment who were clearing a compound at the time of the incident. It was the first time Duley had covered military operations, having arrived in Afghanistan only two weeks earlier. “The IFJ applauds the courage of Giles Duley and many others like him who expose themselves to extreme personal risk in order to report the grim realities of war,” IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said. “The IFJ sends its best wishes to our colleague for as speedy a recovery as is possible, given the extent of his injuries.” Duley spent a decade as an editorial photographer in the fashion and music industries, with his exhibited and published around the world in publications such as Vogue, GQ, Esquire, Rolling Stone, Sunday Times and New Statesman. In recent years he has concentrated on humanitarian projects, working with charities such as Médecins sans Frontiers. New York Times photographer Joao Silva stepped on an anti-personnel landmine in October in southern Afghanistan, losing both legs and sustaining other injuries in the blast.
***14.02.2011. 17 Palestinian NGOs announced yesterday that they are forming a coalition to defend freedom of expression in oPt
17 Palestinian human rights, women, media and youth organizations announced yesterday that they will be joining forces to form a coalition focused on defending freedom of expression in the occupied Palestinian territories, with press freedoms at the top of the agenda.
Initiated by the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA), participating organizations agreed to form a coalition after holding a number of preliminary meetings in Ramallah and Gaza in the start of 2011.
All of the involved organizations believe in the importance of a joint effort lead by civil society institutions to develop respect for freedom of expression in the oPt, as guaranteed by article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Palestinian Basic Law, in harmony with their role in enhancing democracy and human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories and preserving freedom of expression, especially in the continual violation against Palestinian rights and freedom of expression from the Israeli occupation forces and Israeli settlers who committed the most of violations, in addition to the violations committed by several Palestinian parts in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
The coalition will implement numerous initiatives to achieve its goals in cooperating with all concerned parties to advance freedom of expression in oPt. The coalition membership will be open to civil society organizations and active persons in this field.
Participating institutions in the Freedom of expression coalition:
1- Al- Haq-Law in the Service of Man 2- Aldameer Association for Human Rights 3- Creative Women Forum 4- Center for the Defense of Liberties and Civil Rights (hurryyat) 5- Media Development Center /Birzeit University 6- Observatory of the Arab World to Democracy and Elections(MARSAD) 7- Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) 8- Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) 9- Palestine News Network (PNN) 10- Pen Media 11- Palestinian Institute for Communication and Development 12- Ramallah Center for Human Rights Studies (RCHRS) 13- Women journalists South Forum 14- Sharek Youth Forum 15- Treatment and Rehabilitation Center for Victims of Torture (TRC) 16- Women’s Affairs Technical Committee 17- Hureya Media Center
***11.02.2011. Extraordinary Historical Moment and Opportunity for Egypt
London, 11.02.2011: As Hosni Mubarak’s resignation is announced, ARTICLE 19 calls on the transitional government to abide by the will of the Egyptian people and instigate swift democratic reforms, including an immediate end to censorship of the media and the release of political prisoners.
“Tunisia and Egypt have shown the way toward liberty in the Middle East. The people have spoken out – women, young people, men, overcoming fears, denouncing oppression, human rights violations and corruption, and demanding democratic reforms. This is an extraordinary moment for Egypt – it should quickly and swiftly be translated into an opportunity for real and in-depth reforms and changes. A pathway paved with full protection for human rights, including freedom of expression, is the only way forward for a stable, confident and just Egypt.” says Dr Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director.
18 days of mostly non-violent protests have brought to an end the 30 year dictatorship of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak who has finally step down as president of Egypt today. The Military Council is said to have provisionally taken power.
Triggered by protests in Tunisia, which resulted in the toppling of president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, protesters across much of Egypt over the last 18 days have called for reform and for Mubarak to leave. Demonstrations have also taken place across the Middle East and North Africa.
There have been widespread allegations of human rights violations and disappearances during the protests, and many journalists and human rights defenders have been detained. Accusations of torture of protesters are beginning to emerge, as more and more people feel safer to come forward to tell their stories.
ARTICLE 19 calls for the process of democratic and human rights reform to begin immediately. All imprisoned peaceful protesters and political prisoners, including journalists, should be released. The authorities should immediately investigate and disclose the fate and whereabouts all those who are missing, and immediately inform their families.
The transition and reform processes require, and should be based on, freedom of expression and freedom of the press, transparency, and the ability of all Egyptians, men and women, religious and other minorities and vulnerable groups, to speak out and participate equally and without fear in the reform process and the democratic running of their country.
ARTICLE 19 also urges Egypt’s neighbours to take heed of the revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia and immediately begin a process of real democratisation. In the words of Polish Nobel peace prize winner Lech Wałęsa, “You have no chance to win. The only choice you have is between defeat with bloodshed and defeat without".
***09.02.2011. IFJ Condemns Internet Censorship in Jordan
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today accused the Jordanian government of stifling calls for democratic change after the country’s intelligence service disabled a news website and removed a letter to the King demanding political reforms. The IFJ backed protests by journalists’ leaders and others who joined a protest after the country’s biggest news website http://www.ammonnews.net/ was hacked into and a report over the letter was taken down. Leaders of the IFJ affiliate, the Jordanian Press Association(JPA), joined the demonstration which was held outside the union offices in central Amman. “This is a sinister development that shows how vulnerable free speech on the internet has become to spooks and censors from inside government,” said Aidan White IFJ General Secretary. “We support the rights of journalists across all sectors of the media to publish freely. This incident is shocking evidence of political interference in the democratic process.” The IFJ says that it will support the Jordan Press Association and its members who demand that journalists are allowed to work without restraint, particularly when voices calling for political change are being heard across the Arab world and in Jordan itself. “This is a momentous time when the people have a right to know and a right to participate in debates about the future,” said White. “It is not for government and their security people to try to censor legitimate comment.”
***04.02.2011. The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) joigned the call of around 60 organisations worldwide on Egypt to protect freedom of expression and the right to information
Civil society organisations around the world are calling on Egyptian and international bodies to respect freedom of expression and the right to information.
We, the undersigned civil society organisations working to promote freedom of expression around the world, condemn the serious violations of human rights taking place at this critical moment in Egypt. Since pro-democracy activists first began popular protest across Egypt on 25 January, there have been at least three hundred deaths, incidents of physical attacks and brutality, often involving live fire, and arbitrary arrests and detentions of protestors and journalists. The government has also restricted access to the internet, withdrawn mobile phone services and placed restrictions on independent media.
These measures have had the effect of silencing and suppressing the speech of legitimate protestors and presented significant obstacles to many others, both inside and outside the country, who wish to access or share information about the demonstrations and the human rights abuses that have occurred during this period. Egypt's total censorship of the internet and mobile communications also stands to encourage other governments in the region and beyond to take similar action.
In our opinion, the Egyptian authorities are in violation of the state's international human rights obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with respect to the right to freedom of expression and the right to information as well as the right to freedom of assembly and association, the right to liberty, the right to life and the right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
As massive rallies take place across Egypt, we call upon the Egyptian state authorities, including the national government, police, security and armed forces to:
• Remove any remaining limitations on access to the internet and mobile communications and refrain from imposing any such restrictions • Remove all restrictions on independent media and release all journalists and lawful protestors who have been detained • Respect Egypt's international legal obligations in policing the protests and only use force that is reasonable, proportionate and genuinely aimed at preventing crimes • Ensure that there are independent and effective investigations into allegations of killings, attacks or threats by state agents • Immediately repeal state emergency laws.
We further call upon influential states, intergovernmental and regional organisations, including the United Nations, African Union and the European Union to:
• Condemn all violations of human rights by Egyptian state authorities during this period of popular unrest in Egypt • Exert pressure on Egypt to remove any remaining limitations on access to the internet and mobile communications and refrain from imposing any such restrictions • Exert pressure on the Egyptian state authorities to respect human rights, in particular the right to freedom of expression and the right to information • Support a smooth transition in Egypt to a system that embraces democracy, the rule of law and human rights.
We will continue to closely monitor the events in Egypt as they unfold. Signed,
Adil Soz - International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech Andean Foundation for Media Observation & Study Arab Archives Institute ARTICLE 19 Association of Caribbean Media Workers Association of Independent Electronic Media Bahrain Center for Human Rights Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies Canadian Journalists for Free Expression Cartoonists Rights Network International Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility Center for Media Studies & Peace Building Centre for Independent Journalism Democracy Coalition Project (DCP) Fojo Media Institute Foundation for Press Freedom freeDimensional and the Creative Resistance Fund Freedom Forum Freedom House Free Media Movement Globe International Hong Kong Journalists Association Human Rights Network for Journalists Independent Journalism Center Index on Censorship Initiative for Freedom of Expression Institute for the Studies on Free Flow of Information Institute of Mass Information Instituto Prensa y Sociedad Instituto Prensa y Sociedad de Venezuela International Federation of Journalists International Media Support (IMS) International Press Institute International Publishers Association Maharat Foundation (Skills Foundation) Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance Media Foundation for West Africa Media Institute of Southern Africa Mizzima News National Press Association National Union of Somali Journalists Observatoire pour la liberté de presse, d'édition et de création Observatorio Latinoamericano para la Libertad de Expresión Pacific Freedom Forum Pacific Islands News Association Pakistan Press Foundation Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms PEN Canada Privacy International Public Association "Journalists" Reporters Without Borders SKeyes Center for Media and Cultural Freedom (Samir Kassir Eyes) Southeast Asian Press Alliance Thai Journalists Association World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters Writers in Prison Committee, PEN International
***02.02.2011. EGYPT - INSI Advisory - News crews in Egypt facing increasing threats to their safety
News crews covering the violent clashes in Egypt are facing increased threats to their safety, amid reports that a growing number are being targeted by protesters loyal to President Hosni Mubarak, angry at the foreign media's coverage of the situation in the country.
Al Jazeera has had its offices in the country closed, while Al Arabiya reported that one of its correspondents, Ahmed Bagatu, was injured. But, even though some government supporters are said to have been carrying placards saying 'Down with Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya, other non-Arab news organisations have been attacked. The Associated Press said two of its correspondents had been "roughed up" by the crowd. A Belgian reporter on Wednesday was arrested, beaten and accused of being a spy by men in plain clothes in the central Cairo neighborhood of Choubra. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that four Israeli reporters had also been arrested. CNN reported that an Egyptian reporter for Al-Arabiya went missing. He was beaten and handed over to Egyptian military. It said that journalists from the BBC, ABC News and CNN were also attacked. Among them were CNN's Hala Gorani and Anderson Cooper, who said he was hit on the head by a protester. Hala Gorani was quoted as saying, "I got slammed against the gates and was threatened by one of the pro-Mubarak protesters who was ... telling me to 'get out, get out!' and saying it very close to my face. The pro-Mubaraks, whoever they are, whoever sent them, are being threatening toward camera crews, journalists, anybody who looks like they may be onlookers. Some of the elements there are rather thuggish and they seem to be intent on causing trouble." NBC News' Richard Engel said, in a message on Twitter, that journalists in Cairo had been "mobbed on the streets" by people angry with foreign press coverage. A spokesman for the US State Department PJ Crowley also took to Twitter to say it was "concerned about detentions and attacks" on the media, saying that "the civil society that Egypt wants to build includes a free press"
INSI advises all journalists covering civil disturbances to plan accordingly and take appropriate precautions. The following information may help: CIVIL DISTURBANCE CHECKLIST • Plan in advance • Establish pre-arranged contact points with the rest of your team (photographer, camera operator, producer, etc.) if you are separating • Always carry press identification but conceal it if it attracts unwarranted attention • Bring a cellular phone with emergency numbers pre-set for speed dialling • Position yourself upwind if there is a possibility that tear gas will be used • Bring eye protection such as swimming goggles or industrial eye protection • Carry first aid kits and know how to use them • Wear loose natural fabric clothing as this will not burn as readily as synthetic ones; remember there is always the possibility of gasoline bombs being exploded • Carry a small backpack with enough food and water to last for a day in case you are unable to get out of the area • If you are a reporter you don’t have to be in the crowd as long as you can see what’s happening • If you are a photographer or camera operator, try to shoot from a higher vantage point The use of flats and buildings to report is common-place, but ensure exit is possible and does not become obstructed. • Work with the team and keep a mental map of your escape route if things turn bad • Have an immediate newsroom debriefing after the coverage to extract lessons from the coverage RECOMMENDED EQUIPMENT 1. Baseball Bump cap (Head Protection in style of Baseball Cap) 2. Standard Eyeshields 3. Goggles (Protection against Tear Gas) 4. Footwear -- boots with non-stick sole and ankle protection 5. Personal First Aid Kit 6. Knee Pads 7. Ear Plugs
Also consider: 1. Stab Resistant Vest 2. Flame Retardant Spray 3. Flame retardant Underwear 4. Steel Toe Cap Footwear 5. Hi-Visibility Vest 6. Hand Protection
***31.01.2011. IFJ Condemns “Desperate Tactics” as Egypt Targets Media
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on Egypt to end the crackdown on journalism and media which has led to numerous beatings of media staff and censorship of television and communications networks. As the political crisis has intensified with renewed protests in the streets the regime of President Hosni Mubarak has become ever-more desperate to stop media coverage of the uprising. Media reports say that the Government last week blocked websites and the Qatari- based international broadcaster, Al-Jazeera has been taken off the air. Its office in Cairo has been shut down and staff were arrested, their film confiscated. The studios of the French public broadcaster, France 2 have also been shut. “This targeting of media is desperation on the part of a regime that is in the brink of collapse,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “It makes a mockery of the Government’s talk of dialogue to restore calm.” According to a statement from Al-Jazeera, five Cairo-based staff were arrested following the Government’s decision over the weekend to withdraw the broadcaster’s licence and its journalists’ accreditation in the country. They were released today. The move against Al-Jazeera comes days after access to websites in Egypt was blocked ahead of the major streets protests of last Friday. Reports also say the studios of French TV, France 2, have been closed and one camera damaged, according to the SNJ-CGT, an IFJ affiliate in France. The IFJ, which last week denounced police violence against journalists and warned the authorities over their responsibility for media safety, says the latest measures cast doubt over the Government’s willingness to change. “Shutting down media as a public space for dialogue is no way for showing genuine commitment to tolerant debate on the country’s future,” added White. “The authorities are failing the basic test of open democracy by stifling free press.”
***28.01.2011. EGYPT -UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS URGES GOVERNMENT RESTRAINT AND RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN EGYPT
GENEVA – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay on Friday urged the Government of Egypt to exercise restraint and protect the rights of its citizens to freedom of expression, information and assembly in line with the country’s legislation and international human rights law.
“It has been brought to my attention that since the street protests erupted, police have confronted protestors with rubber-coated bullets, tear gas, water cannons and batons, and arrested more than 1,000 people, including political opponents,” she said.
“While maintaining rule and order are important, the responsibility of the Government to protect the rights to life, liberty and security is paramount.”
Ms. Pillay also noted reports of blocked Internet access and mobile service interruptions, as well as harassment of journalists and photographers.
“I call on the Government to take concrete measures to guarantee the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and expression, including by restoring free use of mobile phones and social networks,” she said.
The High Commissioner called on the Government to initiate investigations into reports of the use of excessive force, particularly the killing of at least five and possibly more civilians, and to ensure justice, truth and reparations for victims and their relatives.
Drawing attention to the fact that Egypt’s emergency law has been in force for almost 30 years, she called for it to be lifted, stressing the importance of accountability and the rule of law in creating a stable society.
“I believe the lifting of the emergency law is long overdue and it lies at the root of much of the frustration and anger that has now boiled over into the streets,” she said.
She welcomed calls by the Egyptian National Council for Human Rights for an open dialogue including all political parties and social groups to formulate steps to end poverty and fight corruption.
“People must be entitled to express their grievances against violations of their civil and political rights as well as their frustrations at lack of realisation of their economic rights, the right to work and the right to an adequate standard of living,” the High Commissioner added.
“And governments in the region and around the world must take heed. Suppressing citizens’ voices, silencing dissent and stifling criticism will not make the problems go away. Recent events in the region highlight the fact that tackling serious problems by resorting primarily to high-handed security measures only causes them to fester and eventually erupt on a large scale.”
For further information and media requests, please contact OHCHR spokesperson Rupert Colville (+41 22 917 9310)
***28.01.2011. IFJ Calls for End to Violence against Journalists in Egypt
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today accused security forces in Egypt of indiscriminate violence after scores of journalists were forcibly detained and beaten during recent protests in the capital, Cairo, calling for political change in the country. At least ten Egyptian journalists were detained during a protest held outside the Egyptian Journalists Syndicate (EJS) office in Cairo and foreign reporters were arrested and beaten while covering the protests. “Journalists, the world over, are appalled by the thuggery of Egypt’s state security officers and riot police, beating and arresting protesters as well as journalists and photographers in Cairo,” said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President.” We hold the government primarily responsible for directing the police charge and call on them to order an immediate halt to these attacks.” According to the Egyptian Journalists’ Syndicate, the journalists who were arrested on Wednesday have been released along with around 200 students after they insisted on the release of all detained protesters, especially university students who were due to sit their exams on Thursday. The EJS says that journalists were demonstrating outside their offices when the security forces forcibly intervened to break up the protest and made several arrests among journalists and other protesters. The journalists who were detained included Karem Mahmmoud, former head of press freedom committee of the EJS and Abd Al-Qudus, both of whom were badly beaten by police. The Guardian’s reporter in Cairo, Jack Shenker, was attacked by plain cloth officers while covering the protest in downtown Cairo who bundled him in a van with many other protesters. He managed to provide a live account of officers’ brutality against all detainees who managed to escape after overpowering the van’s guard outside Cairo, according to the Guardian’s website. Other foreign reporters were also targeted, including Associated Press TV News cameraman Haridi Hussein Haridi and his assistant Haitham Badry who were arrested but have now been released . The IFJ defends the journalists’ rights to express their views in a peaceful way and warns that the authorities’ violent response is likely to escalate the protests and endanger the safety of media. “Journalists have a job to do and they have the right to be able to report safely on these demonstrations without being punched, kicked or arrested,” added Boumelha. “The Egyptian government must be responsible for their safety.”
***27.01.2011. EGYPT. Journalists targeted by police violence, arrests (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders roundly condemns police use violence against journalists covering Egypt’s street protests. It is hard to establish exactly how many journalists have been arrested or physically attacked by police officers in the past 48 hours. According to the latest information obtained by Reporters Without Borders, more than a dozen journalists have been arrested.
We urge the Egyptian authorities to allow journalists to work without fear of being arrested or attacked by those who are supposed to protect them. We also call for the immediate release of all the media workers still being held and an end to the blocking of communications. It is essential for the Egyptian people to have access to reliable information about the events of the past few days.
Reporters Without Borders reminds the Egyptian authorities that the United States has urged them not to disrupt online social networks. US secretary of state Hillary Clinton also voiced concern about the arrests of journalists. France has called on Egypt to respect civil liberties including freedom of expression.
Here are details of some of the cases of arrests or attacks on journalists:
Daily News reporter Mohamed Effat was arrested at around 6 p.m. yesterday and was taken to the Qasr el-Nil police station. He was then transferred to the Nasr City police station.
Despite having press cards issued by the Egyptian authorities, Associated Press Television News cameraman Haridi Hussein and his assistant, Haitham Badry, were arrested at about 1 a.m. yesterday while filming clashes between protesters and police. They were released this morning.
AP photographer Nasser Gamal Nasser was covering protests on the evening of 25 January when he struck in the face by a stone thrown by a policeman. His right cheekbone was fractured and his camera was broken.
Three journalists with the daily Ash-Shourouq – Ahmed Bihnassawi, Ahmed Abdel Latif and Imen Hilal – were roughed up by police officers on the evening of 25 January. Bihnassawi was hit on the head by a policeman who confiscated his camera. Hilal was attacked by a police officer while covering the protests outside the headquarters of the company Sidnawi. The policeman hit him in the face and smashed his photographic equipment.
Amru Salaheddin, a photographer with the opposition daily Al-Wafd, was arrested today. So too were Ibrahim Mamdouh Siam of Radio Horytna, Samuel Al-Ashy of Reuters and Abdel Rahman Izz ad-Din Imam of Al-Doustour. The police today also arrested Sami Al-Belchy, the deputy editor of the magazine Al-Idhaa wa Al-Tilfaza, Sherif Arif, the deputy editor of Al-Ahrar, and two members of the Journalists’ Syndicate, Mohamed Abdul Quddus and Karim Mahmoud.
Facebook and Twitter are reportedly being blocked intermittently. Telephone communications were blocked today in Suez and the surrounding area because of the many protests being organized in response to the death of three demonstrators in yesterday’s clashes in this port city.
***26.01.2011. SRI LANKA. Press marks cruel anniversary
A year ago last January, Sri Lankan cartoonist Prageeth Eknelygoda mysteriously disappeared. Two years ago this month, independent TV station Sirasa was bombed with military precision - a couple of days before well-known editor Lasantha Wickrematunge, who was critical of his government's war against the Tamil Tigers, was killed.
Today, none of the cases have been solved, and no one has been brought to justice. Sri Lanka's Free Media Movement (FMM) and other IFEX members have launched a series of campaigns and actions to commemorate one of Sri Lanka's "cruellest months for journalists."
FMM joined an alliance of journalists and press freedom advocates on 18 January outside the Fort Railway Station in the capital, Colombo, demanding that the government expedite investigations into the series of attacks.
One of the protesters was Sandhya Eknelygoda, Prageeth's wife. Prageeth, the political cartoonist and columnist who supported the now-jailed opposition leader Sareth Fonseka, has not been seen by his family or colleagues since he left for work at the pro-opposition news website Lanka eNews on 24 January 2010.
Sandhya issued a public letter in December that pleaded for information about her husband's disappearance. Then, along with FMM and other press groups, she reiterated her demands to the UN country representative on 24 January 2011 - the first anniversary of Eknelygoda's disappearance. To date, she has not had any formal response or update from the police, the attorney general's office, the Sri Lankan government or even the UN.
CPJ has also put out a public appeal to help Eknelygoda's family and other journalists caught in similar straits around the world.
At the same time, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has teamed up with Cartooning for Peace and launched an international support campaign, using 12 cartoons by cartoonists throughout the world to symbolise each month that Eknelygoda has been missing.
Wickrematunge's case has fared no better. According to CPJ, on 13 January, President Mahinda Rajapaksa told Sri Lankan media his government had no evidence to continue an investigation into Wickrematunge.
"In the two years since Lasantha's murder on 8 January 2009, the government has stonewalled the investigation while it has been passed around like a hot potato from one investigating body to another," said Sonali Samarasinghe, Wickrematunge's widow.
FMM is holding a Wickrematunge memorial lecture in February.
Meanwhile, writers from Asia and all over the world are planning to gather in the southern city of Galle for a literary festival from 26 to 30 January, co-sponsored by Sri Lanka's leading tourism promotion agencies.
"We believe this is not the right time for prominent international writers… to give legitimacy to the Sri Lankan government's suppression of free speech by attending a conference that does not in any way push for greater freedom of expression inside that country," say Journalists for Democracy in Sri Lanka (JDS), a network of exiled Sri Lankan journalists, and RSF in an appeal asking for writers and intellectuals to endorse their campaign for more free expression in Sri Lanka.
In Sri Lanka, RSF and JDS have come under fire for calling for a boycott, which critics say suppresses free speech. RSF and JDS refute the claim, saying that the appeal urges festival organisers and writers who are planning to attend to give some thought to the situation of dissident writers, journalists and cartoonists in Sri Lanka, like Eknelygoda and Wickrematunge.
***25.01.2011. NEPAL. UNITED NATIONS: International Community Urge Nepal to Address Impunity and Protect Journalists
Geneva. At the tenth session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group today, countries from around the world recommended the Nepali government immediately address the growing impunity in the country, and protect journalists and human rights defenders from attacks.
“The international community has come together during today’s review to highlight the growing concern about impunity in the country and call for the government to address the worrying situation,” said Dr Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director.
ARTICLE 19 attended the UPR of Nepal, during which impunity was by far the most repeated issue by the delegates, with reference to the continuous attacks against media workers and human rights defenders in Nepal.
The Czech Republic, Canada, France and the United States of America recommended the government of Nepal safeguard the security of journalists and implement adequate measures for the protection and investigation of crimes against journalists and human rights defenders.
The Czech Republic specifically called for thorough investigation and prosecution into the case of the murder of female reporter Uma Singh in 2009. Norway also recommended the government to investigate attacks against female journalists and prosecute the perpetrators. France urged the government to address the lack of enforcement of the rights to freedom of expression, assembly and information.
Impunity was also addressed by Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland and the UK.
In response, the government of Nepal pledged to tackle impunity and address the human rights concerns of the delegates. But the government was unwilling to accept the role of the Nepali Army in the continuation of widespread impunity, arguing that: “the Nepali Army are fully supportive of human rights and any issues are not supported by policy … The Nepali Army is the source of Nepali democracy.” The recommendations made by the international community at the UPR of Nepal, were in line with those made by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) stakeholders’ report, to which ARTICLE 19 and Freedom Forum jointly contributed.
In their joint submission in August 2010, ARTICLE 19 and Freedom Forum highlighted five areas of concern, including (1) killing of and violent attacks against journalists and human rights defenders, (2) impunity for attacks and political protection, (3) freedom of expression in the Interim Constitution and overall legal framework fail to meet international standards, (4) regulation of the media fails to promote independence and transparency, (5) the government has failed to give a full effect to the right to freedom of information.
***21.01.2011. PAKISTAN. Reports of a journalist "hit-list" in Pakistan - INSI demands government action
London, January 20 - A "hit-list" of journalists targeted for murder is reportedly being circulated in Pakistan, currently the deadliest country in the world for the news media, informed sources have told the International News Safety Institute (INSI). Sixteen journalists were murdered in Pakistan last year, and that pattern of violence seems to be continuing in 2011 with two journalists killed in the past two weeks. Twenty-nine year-old Wali Khan Babar, shot dead in Karachi on 13 January, was one of 16 names on the hit-list, the sources said. INSI called on the Pakistani government and police to intervene and stop the killing. "The Pakistani authorities have a duty to protect all citizens, journalists included," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "Pakistan already is number one in the world for journalist murder - it is beyond time now for real action. "This list apparently identifies people lined up for murder. The government must act swiftly to protect them and arrest those responsible for this shocking state of affairs." The shooting of Babar has spooked the media community in Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city. The journalist, who worked for the private television channel Geo News, was stuck in a traffic jam on his way home when a man stopped outside his car, pulled out his pistol and shot him several times in the head, according to police. They say they are treating the killing as premeditated murder. Fifteen other names are reported to be on the hit-list, which is said to be comprised of mainly ethnic Pashtun journalists and is being attributed by many Karachi journalists to the militant wing of MQM, Pakistan’s third largest and most liberal political party. INSI has not seen the list, but it is believed to be in possession of the authorities. INSI sources understand that one correspondent has gone into hiding after being told by Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik that he was number two on the list behind the dead man, Wali Khan Babar. In recent months, ethnic violence has spiralled in Karachi, with shootings and targeted killings increasing in frequency. And as the violence intensifies, so too does the political vitriol, with the MQM party remaining at loggerheads with the mainly Pashtun ANP, both of whom blame each other for undermining law and order in the city. In Karachi, INSI’s sources say the military has been deployed – so far with limited result – but that is unlikely to be of much comfort to the city’s journalists. The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) warned last week that the assassination of Salmaan Taseer, governor of the Punjab province in Pakistan, may open the door to a new wave of political intolerance and pressure on journalists across the country. It said that unless media and journalists isolate extremists and challenge incitement to violence the killing will lead to fresh attacks and the targeting of journalists who defend the right to free expression. Any questions about this news release should be address to Hannah Storm email hannah.storm@newssafety.org +44 7766814274
***07.01.2011. SOMALIA. NUSOJ releases Annual Report on State of Freedom of the Press in Somalia
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) today releases the union’s annual report on state of freedom of the press in Somalia in 2010 summarising major press freedom violations and challenges in southern and central regions of Somalia, Puntland and Somaliland.
The yearly report, which describes cases of killings, arrests, injury, expulsion, death threats, imprisonment, looting of media houses, media houses taken over, court cases against journalists and journalists fleeing, arranges unequivocally the violations in the order of their occurrences.
The report, entitled “Mouth-murder” and Media Hijacking: A Year of Heartache and Fear for Somali Journalists, states that “the most attacks against journalists have been attributed to Islamist armed forces, followed by the Puntland administration and their security forces and the transitional federal government”.
“Killings of journalists have been a source of terrible pain in the hearts of journalists especially in the conflict-ravaged city of Mogadishu, which is still where most journalists were murdered in our beloved country,” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
NUSOJ cited that since killing journalists has not been entirely effective in silencing independent journalism, the armed Islamist groups, al-Shabaab and Hizbul Islam, have resorted to seizing private media houses from their legitimate owners, taking over a total of seven media houses to use them for war propaganda and hate campaigns against those who fail to promote their ideology.
“Independent reporting is no longer possible from places such as Baidoa, Jowhar, Beledweyne, Bardhere and Kismayo” declared Omar Faruk. “People in these towns are therefore suffering a total blackout of independent news. In defiance of atrocities, Radio Shabelle continues to brave the deadly al-Shabaab and has moved to a new location to broadcast independently in the capital city”.
With Islamists now in control of the majority of southern and central regions, including most of the capital, “the suffering of the media is unmistakable”. The Transitional Federal Government (TFG) has failed to safeguard human rights, including the right to free expression and freedom of the press, NUSOJ stated.
“Young and unknown adults are increasingly appearing, claiming to be journalists but widely suspected to have another hidden and illicit agenda. This is another emerging threat to press freedom that reduces the space for professional and genuine journalists to operate”, said Omar Faruk Osman.
The National Union of Somali Journalists notes that Puntland, a semi-autonomous state in the northeast, has been experiencing a worsening press freedom climate. “The Puntland administration has increased suppression and attacks against journalists and the independent media in the last six months,” said Burhan Ahmed, NUSOJ Puntland Coordinator. A special section was first time dedicated in the annual report for the situation in Puntland.
The impunity with which journalists are attacked fuels further terrible crimes against journalists while in Puntland the judiciary has been hugely compromised, NUSOJ states. Lack of the rule of law in the southern regions continues to put the lives of journalists in danger. There are similar problems in Puntland where police and security agents operate at will with no respect for the work of journalists.
NUSOJ’s concern is that as the period of the transitional government ends in August 2011 without a viable political and security solution for the country, armed power struggles may increase and politicians as well as armed groups will turn their guns on journalists who refuse to be cowed by their intimidation and manipulation. -- For further information, contact: National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, tel/fax: +252 1 859 944, e-mail: newsletter@nusoj.org Internet: www.nusoj.org
***03.01.2011. BELARUS: THE PRESS EMBLEM CAMPAIGN (PEC) CONDEMNS THE POST-ELECTION CRACKDOWN AGAINST JOURNALISTS
Dozens of journalists arrested in a police crackdown on demonstrations that followed the re-election of President Alexander Lukashenko last month remain in jail, some of whom could face 15 years in jail for organising public disorder, report IFEX members and the Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ). Since the election, security forces have also raided the homes and offices of critical Belarusian journalists and confiscated equipment.
According to BAJ, an affiliate of the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), 24 journalists were arrested in the crackdown, and 21 were physically assaulted. A number were sentenced to up to two weeks' detention and others remained "under investigation".
Irina Khalip, correspondent for the Moscow newspaper "Novaya Gazeta" and winner of last year's Central European Initiative (CEI) and the South East Europe Media Organisation (CEI SEEMO) Investigative Journalism Award, and Natalya Radina, editor of the pro-opposition news website Charter 97, have been charged with organising and participating in mass disorder, reports the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). They have been held at a KGB detention centre since 20 December and face up to 15 years in jail if convicted.
Radina suffered head and ear injuries when police violently dispersed a post-election demonstration that she was covering, but she has not received medical attention in custody, says CPJ. BAJ confirmed that Belarusian authorities are trying to place Khalip's three-year-old son in a foster home against the wishes of his grandparents.
Khalip's husband, opposition presidential candidate Andrei Sannikov, is also being held by the KGB, reports CPJ. Sannikov was tortured while in custody - his legs appear to be broken, and his speech and behaviour indicate head injuries, his lawyer told Amnesty International.
Meanwhile, KGB agents continued to raid the homes and offices of independent and pro-opposition journalists and seized equipment, apparently searching for photographs and video footage of the election protests.
On 28 December security agents raided the offices shared by "Nasha Niva" and the Belarusian PEN Center on suspicion of organising public disorder and desecrating national symbols, says BAJ. KGB agents confiscated a dozen computers and numerous digital storage devices. On the same day, security agents searched the home of "Nasha Niva" editor-in-chief Andrei Skurko, forced Skurko to sign a gag order and took his computer, says CPJ.
Similarly, government agents confiscated computers and other equipment on a 25 December raid at the Minsk offices of European Radio for Belarus (Evroradio), reports CPJ, halting news broadcasts from Minsk. Evroradio continued broadcasting from its headquarters in Warsaw. Local press reports said the raid might have been in retaliation for Evroradio interviews with Russian political analysts who were sharply critical of Lukashenko.
Agents also raided the premises of Belsat but weren't able to seize property; apparently apprehensive journalists had dismantled station equipment and taken it home for the holiday, says CPJ.
Several journalists working for these independent media outlets continue to have their homes searched and equipment confiscated, report BAJ, CPJ and Index on Censorship.
In a rare joint statement issued on 23 December, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton condemned the post-election violence and called for the immediate release of more than 600 political detainees rounded up after the election. "Respect for democracy and human rights remain central to improving Belarus's relations with the United States and the European Union. Without substantial progress in these areas, relations will not improve," said the statement.
Freedom House is calling on the EU to renew full sanctions against Belarus if Lukashenko fails to take restorative action. "The current situation is much worse than that in 2006, when the EU and U.S. together imposed sanctions against the regime."
According to CPJ, the Central Election Commission reported that Lukashenko won a fourth term in office with just under 80 percent of the vote. Observers with the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) criticised the lack of transparency in the vote count and the suppression of the news media.
A defiant Lukashenko told a news conference on 20 December that post-election detainees were "pogromists and bandits." In an explicit threat against the press, he pledged to make journalists "answer for every word they write," reports CPJ.
***31.12.2010. IFJ Reports Heavy Media Loss to Violence after 97 Journalists Died in 2010
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today warned that journalists and media personnel remain prime targets for political extremists, gangsters and terrorists as it announced that at least 94 journalists and media personnel who were killed in 2010, victims of targeted killings, bomb attacks and crossfire incidents. Three other journalists lost their lives in accidents this year.
The IFJ list was issued just two days after police in Sweden and Denmark revealed they had foiled a potentially deadly bomb plot against Jyllens Posten, the Danish newspaper that in 2005 set off protests around the world when it published cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammed.
Elsewhere the IFJ list puts Pakistan top of the list of the most dangerous zones for journalists in 2010, ahead of Mexico, Honduras and Iraq.
"Nearly 100 journalists killed is a heavy loss which ought to stir the world governments into action to offer better protection to journalists," said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. "The sheer number of murders and conflict related incidents which claimed the lives of journalists and media personnel around the globe this year has brought into sharp focus the high risks associated with the practice journalism today."
The IFJ list of work related media killings is coordinated with the International News Safety Institute (INSI) and contains 94 journalists and media personnel who died during 2010, down from the 139 killings recorded in 2009. There were also three accidental deaths of journalists.
The IFJ says the majority were victims of violence connected to the insurgency war in Pakistan, the drug war in Mexico as well as the political unrest in Honduras. In these countries and others such as Somalia, The Philippines and Iraq, the rule of men of violence and the failure of governments to protect journalists are creating a climate of siege and despair.
"The threats to journalists are everywhere and once again the shadow of impunity falls across the world of journalism," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "Governments must act now to hunt down the killers and make journalism safe, not just for the people who work in the industry but for democracy itself."
As of 31 December, the IFJ recorded the following information on killings of journalists and media staff in 2010:
Targeted killings and homicides incidents : 94
Accidental deaths : 3
Total Deaths : 97
The deadliest region, for the third year running, was Asia Pacific with 38 journalists and media personnel killed. Pakistan had the region's highest death toll with 15 dead.
Every region was affected including Europe where on Wednesday the head of the Danish Security Service said five suspects had been arrested over plans for a "Mumbai-style" attack on the Danish newspaper, referring to the 2008 assault by multiple gunmen around the Indian city that left 163 people dead.
Among countries with high numbers of media fatalities are:
In 2009, The Philippines, Mexico, Pakistan and Russia were the most dangerous countries in the world. The full IFJ report on journalists and media staff killed in 2010 will be published mid- January 2011.
***20.12.2010. WIKILEAKS: CPJ urges US not to prosecute Julian Assange, says historic principles & US image at risk
December 17, 2010 Barack Obama President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500 Via facsimile: +1 202-456-2461
Eric H. Holder Jr. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Via facsimile: +1 202-616-7290
Dear President Obama and Attorney General Holder:
We write because of deep concern about reports that you are considering the prosecution of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange for publishing classified cables and other documents. Based on everything we know about these events, we urge you to avoid such action. Our concern flows not from an embrace of Assange's motives and objectives. Indeed, we wish that he would fully disclose his sources of financing and support. But the Constitution protects the right to publish information of important interest to the public. That right has been upheld through decades of American jurisprudence and has served the people well.
On Thursday, the House Judiciary Committee held hearings on the implications of prosecuting Assange under the 1917 Espionage Act. We believe that such a prosecution could encourage the government to assert legal theories applying equally to all news media, which would be highly dangerous to the public interest. History shows that Congress didn't intend the law to apply to news reporting. Over nearly a century, the government has refrained from using the act against the media. To reverse these long-standing positions would threaten grave damage to the First Amendment's protections of free speech and the press.
As CPJ seeks to defend freedom of expression and the safety and rights of journalists around the world, we find that by far the largest share of imprisoned journalists are jailed on antistate charges, including publishing information that governments deem secret. In the past, we have been proud to point to the United States as a place where journalists may not be jailed because they published something that offends government officials. It would be an incalculable loss to freedom everywhere if America lost its role as a shining example, and authoritarian governments abroad could say they were only doing what the United States was doing in jailing reporters or editors for what they published.
CPJ urges the Justice Department to protect freedom of speech and the press, along with the country's global reputation as a beacon of those values, by standing back from any prosecution of WikiLeaks or Assange for publishing classified documents.
Sincerely, Paul E. Steiger - Chairman Joel Simon - Executive Director
***15.12.2010. PAKISTAN. Worst month for journalist's killing in 10 years
Senior journalist and President of Kuzdar Press Club, Mohammad Khan Sasoli, was shot dead by unknown assailants near his house. He is the second journalists killed in Baluchistan and fourth in a country in a month, raising the death toll of journalists to 14, this year amid reports that more journalists are on the hit list in the troubled province. According to details, Sasoli, who was associated with daily Baluchistan Times, was attacked by armed men, who were on motor-cycle fired the deceased from close range and remain there for sometime and then fledaway.
Early this month journalist Lala Hameed Baluch was killed in Gawadar while President of Mirpurkhas Press Club, Sultan Chandio was killed in Sindh province and two were killed during the sucide blast in the tribal area, bordering Afghanistan. Police have arrested one suspect in Chandio's case whereas no clue could be found in other cases while panic gripped in Baluchistan province. Some 60 journalists had been killed in Pakistan since year 2000, but situation is getting deteriorated in the two most troubled province Baluchistan and Kyber Pakhtoonkhawan and in FATA. Journalists working in Baluchistan, have been subjected to most serious threats allegedly from the intelligence agencies as well as from Baluch militant groups. Some of the journalists working in different Media groups revealed that not only reporter or correspondents faced threats but also those working in the newsroom including Editors, News Editors and even Sub-editors. "There is no concept of freedom of the Press exist in these areas and we can't sent report with our free will or without keeping the possible consequences of the news particularly if relate to any operation in Baluchistan or forces action. We have to publish the Press Release sent by extremist groups or security forces and the desk left with no option but to print it or air it," said a senior journalist, who don't want to be named. In the last three years five journalists had been killed in Baluchistan including three in Kuzdar and two in Gwadar. There have also been incidents in which journalists were detained, mainly by the intelligence agencies. Baluchistan issue considered as most "sensitive" for the media for the past several years. Journalists, who covered the burring issue of the Province often faced harrassment at the hands of agencies and its not confined to the province. A young journalist of DAWN TV, was detained for several hours after he interviewed Baluch nationalist leader, last year. During the period of General Pervez Musharraf, many talk shows on Baluchistan could not be aired and media owners were told to avoid discussion on the sensitive issues of the province. Even if any private channel record any show on the said issues they need to sent one copy to the "intelligence quarters." Its not easy for organisations like Baluchistan Union of Journalists (BUJ) or Quetta Press Club, to organise protest rallies against these killings but the journalists held regular protest and condemned violence against journalists. The recent wave of terror against journalists in Pakistan particularly in Baluchistan province is alarming and journalists all over the country must come forward in solidarity with their colleagues in Baluchistan.
Mazhar Abbas - Ex-Secretary General, pfuj
***DEC.2010. WIKILEAKS, the US Embassy Cables and the right to know (UN, IFJ, Article 19, RSF)
- NAVI PILLAY, UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER A journalist asked at a press conference in Geneva Dec. 9, if the High Commissioner believed that Wikileaks deserved the same whistle blower protection as journalists enjoyed?
The High Commissioner : “Of course, you asked me about Wikileaks, I think that, what is happening here, this is truly what the media would call a cyber war. It is just astonishing what is happening. Let me say that the Wikileaks case raises complex human rights questions about balancing freedom of information, the right of people to know, and the need to protect national security or public order. This balancing act is a difficult one. Let me say article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides for the right to freedom of expression, which includes the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds. Well the right to seek, receive and impart information may be restricted; restriction clauses must be a. necessary and b. proportional, and must be provided by law and should be justified strictly on the need to protect national security or public order. So who is best to judge or strike at the balance but courts of law. Courts of law are equipped to address the delicate issue of balancing competing rights and values. If Mr. Assange has committed any recognized offense, then the judicial system following fair procedures should be able to address how these rights can be balanced. It is important to note that the current charges against him do not relate to leaked information. I am concerned about the reports of pressure exerted on private companies, including banks, credit card companies and internet service providers, to close down credit lines for donations to Wikileaks, as well as to stop hosting the website or its other sites. While it is unclear whether the individual measures taken by private actors directly infringe on States’ human rights obligations to ensure respect of the right to freedom of expression, taken as a whole, that could be interpreted as an attempt to censure the publication of information. That is potentially violating Wikileaks right to freedom of expression. If Wikileaks has committed any recognizable illegal act, then this should be handled through the legal system, and not through pressure and intimidation, including on third parties.”
- IFJ Condemns United States “Desperate and Dangerous” Backlash over WikiLeaks The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the political backlash being mounted against the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks and accused the United States of attacking free speech after it put pressure on the website’s host server to shut down the site yesterday. The website’s host Amazon.com blocked access to WikiLeaks after United States officials condemned the torrent of revelations about political, business and diplomatic affairs that has given people around the world unprecedented access to detailed information from United States sources, much of it embarrassing to leading public figures. “It is unacceptable to try to deny people the right to know,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “These revelations may be embarrassing in their detail, but they also expose corruption and double-dealing in public life that is worthy of public scrutiny. The response of the United States is desperate and dangerous because it goes against fundamental principles of free speech and democracy.” The IFJ has taken no position on the justification for the release of hundreds of thousands of internal documents which have made headlines around the world in the last few days, but it has welcomed the decision of WikiLeaks to use respected channels of journalism including Der Spiegel, The Guardian, the New York Times and El Pais to filter the information. “This information is being processed by serious, professional journalists who are well aware of their responsibilities both to the public and to people implicated in these revelations,” said White. “It is simply untenable to allege as some people have that lives are being put at risk here. The only casualty here is the culture of secrecy that has for too long drawn a curtain around the unsavory side of public life.” The IFJ is also concerned about the welfare and well-being of Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder and Bradley Manning, the United States soldier in Iraq who is under arrest and suspected of leaking the information. Both men are the target of a growing political campaign mounted by government officials and right-wing politicians. Assange has been forced into hiding and is the subject of an international police investigation over allegations concerning sexual offences in Sweden. The IFJ says that calls by right wing commentators for Manning to be executed and that Assange be hunted down as a spy, as demanded by former Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin, show a mood of intolerance and persecution that is dangerous not just for the two men but for all journalists engaged in investigating public affairs. “The IFJ and its members support the rights of whistle-blowers and the responsible reporting of information in the public interest,” said White. “This over-reaction by politicians and their allies illustrates that they have not understood the historical significance of these events. The people’s right to know is not something that can any longer be willfully ignored. They have to adjust to the fact journalists have a duty to report, fairly and accurately and with due respect for the rights of all parties in the public interest.”
ARTICLE 19 - WikiLeaks and Internet companies
ARTICLE 19 is extremely concerned by the political pressure governments and elected officials are exerting on internet companies, to force them to deny provision of services to WikiLeaks without prior authorisation from a court. Recent actions by a number of internet companies against WikiLeaks raise several issues about the rights of free expression on the internet, which is largely controlled by private companies but still subject to state threats. Intermediaries, such as internet companies, facilitate connections between the providers of information and the users of that information. Increasingly, they are the subject of legal and other actions whose actual end targets are their service-users. Where these companies can do so lawfully, they should resist such interference.
Any removal of information on internet, or blocking of internet access to information should be authorized only by a court. Actions that seek to limit freedom to donate to their service-users should only be allowed after a finding by a court that a service-user has violated the law. Internet companies in turn should be transparent in actions affecting users of their services. 1. Denial of Services and Arbitrary and Non-Transparent Actions by Intermediaries
To date and without any legal justification, a number of companies have stopped providing services to WikiLeaks because of pressure from governments and elected officials. This has made it more difficult for individuals to access the site, which in turn restricts their right to freedom of information. ARTICLE 19 believes that in the absence of any legal authority or court ruling finding WikiLeaks’ activities to be illegal, this pressure is unlawful and is in violation of national constitutions and international laws protecting freedom of expression.
ARTICLE 19 believes that blocking or removing information from sites, restricting domain names, limiting donations and other restrictions on access to information should be based only on a court order approved by a judge taking into account domestic and international laws on freedom of expression. Such action should not be based on extra-legal government pressure. The actions of government officials in placing such pressure on companies and companies’ compliance by removing access or information without legal authority are characteristic of life under authoritarian regimes. Companies based in the United States, with its long and proudly claimed history of freedom of expression and in Western Europe, with the protections afforded by the European Convention on Human Rights, have no need to submit to such pressure in the absence of a court ruling.
ARTICLE 19 is also concerned that many of the companies have acted non-transparently. Instead they have offered contradictory, shifting and non-credible excuses for their conduct. For example, Amazon dropped WikiLeaks after communications from a US Senator. Amazon has since claimed that WikiLeaks had violated their terms of service because it "doesn’t own or otherwise control all the rights to this classified content." However, at the same time, Amazon continues to sell numerous books containing classified information including an e-book with excerpts from the cables themselves. Other books with similar material include those containing the text of the Pentagon Papers (released this year in Kindle edition) which have never been declassified, and unauthorised memoirs from former spies including Phillip Agee’s Inside the Company: CIA Diary, Spy Catcher by former British spy Peter Wright, and The Mitrokhin Archive by former KGB agent Vasili Mitrokhin, all ! of whom were strongly criticised if not threatened by their governments.
Amazon also sells many books that US government officials have claimed reveal sensitive classified information, including Bob Woodward’s series of books on the Iraq war under the Bush and Obama administrations, James Risen’s book on the CIA, and James Bamford’s book on the National Security Agency. Amazon also continues to partner with the New York Times, which is one of the primary publishers of the cables.
ARTICLE 19 calls on Amazon to issue a public explanation regarding their contradictory stance on the publication of classified materials.
Equally concerning has been the refusal by financial intermediaries and banks, including Paypal, PostFinance, Visa and Mastercard, to process donations for WikiLeaks. ARTICLE 19 notes that WikiLeaks has not been formally charged in any country with any crime and there is no legal authority for these companies to refuse lawful payments.
Paypal, initially claimed that they were asked to drop the processing of donations by the US Government. This was later denied by the later and Paypal now says that it based its decision on a public letter sent to WikiLeaks from a US State Department legal advisor. In no way does this satisfy the requirement that restrictions on speech are based on the rule of law. Paypal's owner Ebay facilitates the selling of many of the same books that Amazon does. Mastercard and Visa’s decision-making is similarly unclear. 2. Lack of Legal Authority
As ARTICLE 19 commented earlier, we do not believe that recent releases of documents by WikiLeaks violate US national law or the law of any other nation. We recall that it is an obligation of governments - not of media and private individuals - to protect the confidentiality of official information, if necessary under legitimate interests. Furthermore, the US Espionage Act has never been used against a media organisation since its inception in 1917. At the time it was written, the Congress rejected amendments that would have expanded its scope in areas that were considered unconstitutional restrictions on the press. In this respect, ARTICLE 19 calls against the adoption of legislation, such as the recent bill introduced by Senator Lieberman and others, to criminalise further disclosures as these would violate international and American freedom of expression standards.
In the absence of legal authority, governments and other elected officials must cease the unlawful harassment of the companies with which WikiLeaks does business.
Under US law, internet intermediaries are not liable for WikiLeaks activities. The Communications Decency Act, §230 states that “No provider … of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” Thus, they are protected from liability for the speech of their clients as a means for encouraging more speech and commerce.
This approach is also widely supported in international law. The special rapporteurs on freedom of expression for the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Organization of American States stated in 2005: “No one should be liable for content on the Internet of which they are not the author, unless they have either adopted that content as their own or refused to obey a court order to remove that content.”
Intermediaries’ unfortunate caving in to the WikiLeaks-related pressure is in direct contradiction to the protections internet intermediaries should enjoy. 3. Blocking by Governments
ARTICLE 19 opposes various attempts by the US authorities to restrict access to WikiLeaks, in violation of their legal obligations to protect free expression. The prohibition of access to the WikiLeaks websites by US government branches, including by the Library of Congress, is foolish and irrational given how widely available the information is. Furthermore, the prohibition of access significantly weakens the role of Congress and its respected research arm, the Congressional Research Service, which, as an independent body, is responsible to oversee the actions of the executive. The unofficial warnings made to students that their future potential government careers may be imperilled if they discussed or linked to the WikiLeaks documents amount to intimidation. They are also counterproductive since a review of the documents will give students a far more accurate picture and understanding of their potential future roles than many other reference materials available.
ARTICLE 19 is also concerned that websites and discussion forums about the WikiLeaks documents were subsequently blocked in many countries including China, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates. In addition, we believe that the statements made by French Industry Minister Eric Besson calling for the blocking of the sites in France to be in full violation of free expression as guaranteed by the French Constitution, the European Convention on Human Rights and international law. ARTICLE 19 welcomes the refusal by French ISP hosting company OVN to drop WikiLeaks and their referral of the question of legality to a court to determine. So far, the Court has refused to make a judgment, citing the need to adequately consider the issues. US officials should take this under advisement.
The attempt to takedown or block the entire WikiLeaks website is also overbroad and violates international human rights law. The website includes many documents on a variety of issues. To block an entire domain removes access to a considerable amount of lawful materials and is not justifiable. It would not be attempted in an offline environment. Bookstores and libraries are not closed and burned to the ground based on the publication of a single or multiple books. Internet speech deserves the same respect.
ARTICLE 19 notes that these efforts to take the site offline have been ultimately counterproductive, with over 1,000 sites now mirroring the WikiLeaks cables. 4. Whistleblower Protection
ARTICLE 19 would also like to reiterate our call for governments to adopt adequate protections for whistleblowers in this case and others. The UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights have stated that under international human rights law, Official Secrets Acts cannot be used to suppress secret information that is of public interest. States should adopt and implement a legal and policy framework that protects whistleblowers from prosecution, and allow for public interest exemptions to secrets laws for revealing information such as corruption or human rights abuses.
Having reviewed a selection of the current releases of the US Embassy cables, ARTICLE 19 maintains that the documents reveal information of great public interest to citizens around the world, including on issues such as corruption in Afghanistan, Kenya, Tunisia, and Nigeria, and censorship in China and Russia. Other issues covered include efforts by the US government to pressure the Spanish government to limit prosecutions of the American military officials who killed a Spanish journalist in Iraq, and pressure on French parliamentarians to adopt a controversial intellectual property law cutting people off of the internet. We note that a number of public figures including US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and former Australian Prime Minister John Howard have said that in their opinion no significant long-term damage would be done from the release of the cables. 5. Denial of Service (or DDOS) Attacks
ARTICLE 19 does not condone the denial of service attacks on Mastercard, Visa and other companies. However, we also note that there seems to be little effort made by authorities to identify and prosecute those who have conducted the attacks against WikiLeaks resulting in the website being taken offline, which also constitutes a violation of criminal law and a violation of freedom of expression.
FURTHER INFORMATION: • For more information please contact: David Banisar, Senior Legal Counsel, ARTICLE 19, banisar@article19.org +44 20 7324 2500 • ARTICLE 19’s previous statement on WikiLeaks are available at: www.article19.org/pdfs/press/wikileaks-and-internet-disclosures.pdf
- Reporters Without Borders condemns the blocking, cyber-attacks and political pressure being directed at cablegate.wikileaks.org, the website dedicated to the US diplomatic cables. The organization is also concerned by some of the extreme comments made by American authorities concerning WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange.
Earlier this week, after the publishing several hundred of the 250.000 cables it says it has in its possession, WikiLeaks had to move its site from its servers in Sweden to servers in the United States controlled by online retailer Amazon. Amazon quickly came under pressure to stop hosting WikiLeaks from the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and its chairman, Sen. Joe Lieberman, in particular.
After being ousted from Amazon, WikiLeaks found a refuge for part of its content with the French Internet company OVH. But French digital economy minister Eric Besson today said the French government was looking at ways to ban hosting of the site. WikiLeaks was also recently dropped by its domain name provider EveryDNS. Meanwhile, several countries well known for for their disregard of freedom of expression and information, including Thailand and China, have blocked access to cablegate.wikileaks.org.
This is the first time we have seen an attempt at the international community level to censor a website dedicated to the principle of transparency. We are shocked to find countries such as France and the United States suddenly bringing their policies on freedom of expression into line with those of China. We point out that in France and the United States, it is up to the courts, not politicians, to decide whether or not a website should be closed.
Meanwhile, two Republican senators, John Ensign and Scott Brown, and an independent Lieberman, have introduced a bill that would make it illegal to publish the names of U.S. military and intelligence agency informants. This could facilitate future prosecutions against WikiLeaks and its founder. But a criminal investigation is already under way and many U.S. politicians are calling vociferously for Assange’s arrest.
Reporters Without Borders can only condemn this determination to hound Assange and reiterates its conviction that WikiLeaks has a right under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment to publish these documents and is even playing a useful role by making them available to journalists and the greater public.
We stress that any restriction on the freedom to disseminate this body of documents will affect the entire press, which has given detailed coverage to the information made available by WikiLeaks, with five leading international newspapers actively cooperating in preparing it for publication.
Reporters Without Borders would also like to stress that it has always defended online freedom and the principle of “Net neutrality,” according to which Internet Service Providers and hosting companies should play no role in choosing the content that is placed online.
***11.11.2010. RUSSIA. EBU shocked by attacks on Russian journalists
Geneva, 11 November 2010 – The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) expressed shock and alarm at recent attacks on Russian journalists. The EBU urged the Russian authorities to ensure that all journalists working in Russia are allowed to carry out their professional duties without risk of violence.
Oleg Kashin of the Kommersant newspaper was attacked outside his home in Moscow on Saturday. Anatoly Adamchuk a reporter for the Zhukovskie Vesti was attacked by two men as he was leaving his newspaper's offices on Monday.
The EBU’s News Assembly* welcomed President Medvedev's condemnation of the attack on Mr Kashin. However, it noted with concern that 19 journalists have been killed in Russia since 2000 and 18 of these cases remain unsolved.
“[The EBU ...] condemns violence against journalists and calls upon governments everywhere to investigate all instances of violence against journalists and bring to justice those responsible”.
The annual EBU News Assembly meeting brings together all major European public service broadcasters.
***08.11.2010. MEXICO. Government Launches Protection Mechanism for Journalists
ARTICLE 19 welcomes the Mexican Federal Government’s long awaited decision to create a mechanism for the protection of journalists. However we are concerned that the mechanism as planned will not protect journalists at risk. “Whilst the belated mechanism is sorely needed, this version has limitations that will severely curtail trust between the government and media workers,” says Dario Ramírez, Director for Mexico and Central America of ARTICLE 19. “Despite the expertise of civil society and journalists, they are excluded from effectively taking part in the mechanism, and this means the mechanism may fail to take account of the environment of violence against journalists and not properly address it.”
In August 2008, ARTICLE 19 called for the Mexican government to establish a mechanism that would protect journalists from increasingly targeted violence. Despite the clear pattern of attacks, it has taken until now for the Mexican government to accept the need.
The National Commission on Human Rights and the Ministry of Interior, along with other governmental institutions will now agree the mechanism, and draft the operational guidelines. Journalists and civil society will not be invited to participate.
ARTICLE 19 welcomes the mechanism, which will assess journalists at risk and define prevention and protection measures on a case-by-case basis, but it is concerned by serious limitations:
1. Lack of resources. The decision does not allocate resources for the mechanism’s implementation, relying on the resources and political will of the authorities involved. ARTICLE 19 has found that political will is lacking so far, and the lack of resources will restrain the mechanism’s capacity to protect
2. Lack of coordination between federal and local levels. The decision relies on local authorities for the implementation of protection measures. ARTICLE 19 has found that local authorities are often involved in violence against journalists, and lack of trust in the local authorities will undermine local protection
3. Lack of civil society participation. The decision excludes civil society organisations from participating in the development of the mechanism and the Risk Evaluation Committee, despite their years of experience in the protection of journalists. ARTICLE 19 believes that this will result in an inadequate analysis of the causes and protection of journalists, poor transparency in the mechanism, and the absence of proper evaluation from a technical and human rights perspective
4. Restricted participation of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. The decision does not allow for the participation of the OHCHR as a full member in the Committee. It is only foreseen as an occasional guest. ARTICLE 19 believes that the OHCHR’s participation is vital in the assessment and decision-making process to ensure a human rights and gender perspective and build trust within the journalism community.
ARTICLE 19 calls on the Mexican Federal Government to take account of the observations made by civil society and journalists, and to ensure their participation in the formulation of the Operational Guidelines of the Mechanism for the Protection of Journalists.
ARTICLE 19 further urges the government to comply with its international human rights obligations and commitments, including the recommendations formulated by the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council and the UN and OAS Special Rapporteurs on Freedom of Expression related to the creation of a mechanism for the protection of journalists. • For more information please contact: Carla Aguirre, carla@article19.org; +52 55 1054 6500
***08.11.2010. RUSSIA. IFJ Calls for Swift Action in Russia after Murderous Attack on Journalist
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has condemned a brutal attack on a leading Russian journalist and has urged the Russian authorities to act quickly to find the attackers and bring them to justice. Moscow journalist Oleg Kashin, an investigative journalist with Kommersant, one of Russia’s best-known national dailies, was set upon on the night of 5-6 November. His attackers, waiting outside his apartment block, beat him so severely that his jaw was broken and both legs fractured. After emergency hospital treatment doctors put him in an induced coma for the next few days. “Regrettably, this is not an isolated incident,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “Our research shows that over 100 journalists in Russia have been targeted in exactly the same way since 2005.” The IFJ says that there is a pattern to these warning attacks – often the use of iron bars by the attackers. In very few cases have investigations, for the most part led by the police, led to any prosecutions. The killings of high-profile journalists such as Anna Politkovskaya in 2006 remain unsolved and suggest a lack of political will to respond to violence against reporters. However, in this latest incident the IFJ welcomes the decision by the authorities to treat the attack seriously. The assault on Kashin has been classified as attempted murder and the inquiry is being led by Moscow city investigative committee, a newly-independent body. “This is good news, but it is only a start,” said White. “If the high level of impunity for such assaults is to be tackled, the investigation must be sustained and far more determined than the failed previous efforts to establish who is behind this sustained campaign of violence against journalists.” The IFJ is also joining Kommersant’s chief editor Mikhail Mikhailin and the Russian Union of Journalists in calling for the authorities to recognise that there is a link between the attack and the investigations conducted by Kashin and his reporting over recent months. “This is the key element in the inquiry and only in that way can the people who ordered the attack and those who carried it out be identified and brought to justice,” said White. The IFJ has also called for the international community to call on Russia to act more effectively to find those responsible for attacks on journalists. “So far the response of many governments, including the European Union, appears feeble and suggests that they are holding back because of strategic self-interest to do with protecting access to Russian energy supplies,” said White. “If this is so, it’s a shameful betrayal of fundamental rights they claim to defend at home and abroad.”
***29.10.2010. UN EXPERT DESCRIBES PRISON SENTENCES FOR PANAMANIAN JOURNALISTS AS A “WORRYING PRECEDENT”
GENEVA – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, expressed his concern regarding the sentencing to prison of two Panamanian journalists, who had been absolved in the first instance, for slander and libel. According to the information received, they were also prohibited from carrying out activities related to their profession for a year.
“This judicial decision represents a worrying precedent for the efforts being made to decriminalize such incidents, especially in cases such as this, wherein the act which led to the punishment relates to information about the actions of public officials,” Mr. La Rue stressed.
Although the sentence was commuted to a fine, and faced with the possibility of a pardon being granted to the journalists for the same crime, the UN independent expert reiterated his position concerning the importance of the right of citizens to be fully informed about the activities of public officials.
“Despite the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” said Mr. La Rue, “States frequently limit or restrict freedom of expression arbitrarily, even resorting to criminal laws or civil actions, in order to silence dissent or criticism.”
The Special Rapporteur urged the State to take account of international instruments related to the exercise of this right, particularly the International Covenant.
***25.10.2010. CUBA: CUBAN DISSIDENT WINS EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S SAKHAROV PRIZE
The European Parliament has awarded its Sakharov human rights prize to Guillermo Fariñas Hernandez, the Cuban dissident whose four-month hunger strike ultimately led to the release of numerous political prisoners in Cuba.
Fariñas, a psychologist, journalist and former soldier, ended a hunger strike in July after the Cuban government agreed to release 52 political prisoners.
"Fariñas's hunger strike made it impossible for the world to ignore the dissidents imprisoned in Cuba," said Human Rights Watch. "The Sakharov prize highlights Cuba's responsibility to free every last political prisoner and dismantle the laws that punish dissent."
During his campaign for human rights he has staged more than 20 hunger strikes and spent more than 11 years in prison.
Speaking to the BBC, Fariñas said he thought the honour could make his campaign for greater freedom in Cuba more difficult. "Anyone who is familiar with the Cuban regime understands that as a dissident becomes more well known the attacks against him become more sophisticated, more bloody and more inhuman," he said.
The IFEX members are calling on the Cuban government to allow Fariñas to receive the award in person in December and to release all remaining political prisoners, estimated to be around 100.
Named after former Russian physicist and human rights advocate Andrei Sakharov, the 50,000 Euro (US$68,800) award is given each year to an exceptional individual or organisation fighting "to protect freedom of thought and expression against intolerance, fanaticism and hatred." This marks the third time that the award has been made to Cuban dissidents since it was first presented in 1988.
***29.09.2010. SOMALIA. Crucial Call for Dedicated Collective Action to End the Violations of Freedom of Expression and the Culture of Impunity in Somalia
UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL 15th Session
Statement by Mr. Omar Faruk Osman Secretary General of the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) on Stand Alone Interactive Dialogue for Somalia
Geneva, 29 September 2010
"Mr. President
Honourable Abdirahman Aden Ibrahim, Deputy Prime Minister of Republic of Somalia Madame Navi Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Excellencies Distinguished Delegates Ladies and Gentlemen
It is a great honour for me to speak to you here today for this stand-alone interactive dialogue for Somalia during which I seek to put under the spotlight, the deteriorating human rights situation in Somalia, particularly the right to freedom of expression. This state of affair has been occasioned by the unremitting deadly and deliberate violence that has led to the total collapse of respect for civilians’ rights as enshrined in international humanitarian law.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the relevant conventions call upon member States of the United Nations to protect and promote universal and indivisible human rights. The members of this Council must, therefore, not turn away their eyes from Human Rights situation in Somalia.
The scope of the term legitimate targets as well as the rule of the proportionality has been widened to suit the interests of the warring parties in Somalia. This has resulted in unacceptably high numbers of civilian victims of the conflict and the widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure, including journalists and their media houses. The actions targeting media in this bloody conflict seek to entrench and enforce a culture of silence, as one way of sapping the social energy of Somali society.
Excellencies,
Somali journalists, who risk life and limb in their work, continue to pay a heavy price for playing their role as the public’s messengers. The violence directed at them undermines their capacity to fulfil this duty. Dozens of journalists have been assassinated while many other dozens daily face threats, intimidation, physical harassment and dislodgement from their workstations.
Twenty-two journalists were murdered since 2007, making them the most victimised group among the foremost defenders of human rights. 3 journalists were killed so far this year. Abdifatah Jama Mire, Director of Horseed Radio in Puntland, is currently serving 6 years jail sentence. This sentence is the most outrageous and the harshest punishment given to a journalist in recent times in this semi-autonomous region of Somalia.
The private media houses were hit hard after Al-Shabaab and Hizbul Islam seized control of 5 radio stations in South-Central regions in the last 6 months. The Islamists have since banned the broadcast of music and songs. All sides in the conflict wanted journalists to favour them in their reporting. These forces also confiscated equipment from journalists. Reporting the truth has become a dangerous business in Somalia, and as a result Journalists have started practicing self-censorship.
Private media is on the verge of total collapse and there is a fear that there could be a total reversal of whatever progress has been made over the past few years. The economic and social consequences of sophisticated restrictions on media have been heavy and have resulted into loss of business and gradually, the media industry is also becoming as sick as the country.
It is of particular concern that media professionals continue to be targets of deadly violence in the southern and central regions of Somalia, and in particular in the capital city. The top priority of the world community must be to end the vicious cycle of violence and impunity directed against journalists and the news media organizations that are being targeted because of their legitimate role of facilitating exchange of news and opinion.
Human rights could not be guaranteed in Somalia in the absence of press freedom and freedom of expression, while freedom of expression could not exist when journalists were not protected and suffered death or violence for telling the truth.
Mr President,
The degree to which human rights are respected and protected serves as a benchmark for a Country’s stability and sustainable development. To secure peace and protect human rights in Somalia, we need a strong and efficient government that lives up to its human rights obligations.
The world community must quickly come to the aid of the survivors of these gruesome violations, and ensure punishment for the perpetrators of human rights violations as a deterrent to future acts of impunity. For the journalists who continue to endure this hell that defies precedent, justice delayed is more than justice denied – it is terror sustained.
Failure to address these violations of human rights against journalists, if left to continue, gives an incentive to the perpetrators to continue their macabre trade.
The UN HRC must impose targeted measures against persistent violators of the right to freedom of expression and freedom of the press by setting up a mechanism for prevention, deterrence and rapid response to the widespread and systematic violence against the right to free expression. We see this as an important step on the road to providing incentives for the protection of civilians.
I thank you Mr. President"
***27.09.2010. MEXICO: Newspaper’s Call for Truce Sign of Government Failing to Protect
Due to the recent assassination of Luis Carlos Santiago Orozco, photographer of El Diario, in Ciudad Juarez, ARTICLE 19 undertook an emergency mission to assess the situation and to express solidarity with journalists working in the city.
Ciudad Juarez is one of the largest cities on Mexico’s northern border with the United States. Since 2006, organised crime groups have been fighting for control of the city due to its strategic location for smuggling goods and migrants. The conflict has resulted in an exponential increase in violent deaths: according to official figures, more than 500 murders have taken place so far in 2010, the majority of which were of women and young people. The majority of people killed are women and adolescent, and journalists and human rights defenders also targeted due to their work.
Over the last three years, ARTICLE 19 has documented the deterioration of freedom of expression in Ciudad Juarez, highlighting violence against the media in the city, and in the wider state of Chihuahua, in its 2009 report on attacks against freedom of expression, Attacks on Freedom of Expression in Mexico.
Josefina Reyes, a human rights defender working on the disappearance of women in Ciudad Juarez, was shot dead in January 2010. In November 2008, Armando Rodriguez, a veteran crime reporter from El Diario, was shot in front of his daughter. In both cases, the criminals remain unpunished, without attackers remain without any significant development in the investigations. In September, two photographers working as interns for El Diario, Luis Carlos Santiago Orozco and "Carlos" were shot in a shopping centre car park just 200 metres from the newspaper headquarters, and Orozco died. During ARTICLE 19’s visit, a small device exploded outside the offices of the newspaper Norte. Fortunately no one was injured.
The local authorities are responsible for investigating all the above ases. In 2010, the state government of Chihuahua adopted a series of actions to protect journalists, such as the creation of an emergency protection system and legal reform to better tackle attacks against the media. However, such achievements are being consistently undermined by local members of the local authorities spreading misinformation, delaying investigations and denying that journalists and human rights defenders are targeted because of their work.
President Felipe Calderon’s policy to combat organised crime includes the deployment of the army and latterly the federal police in Ciudad Juarez and other cities in Chihuahua. However, without a code of conduct for the treatment of the media during operations, deployment of the army and police have resulted in more threats, physical attacks, destruction of equipment and illegal detentions.
“I am more afraid of the federal police than the organized crime, at least you know exactly where you stand ”, explained a reporter during an interview.
On 1 July, federal police broke into the office of the Journalists and Communicators Association without a warrant, claiming they had information that the building was a secure house for kidnappers and the storage of weapons. The illegal entry has not been investigated by the authorities.
The absence of proper legal remedies to investigate cases of attacks on journalists and human rights defenders sends the wrong message to future perpetrators, including those involved in organised crime.
After repeated attacks against its staff, El Diario published a front-page editorial on 19 September asking for a truce with organised crime groups. The government accused the newspaper of negotiating with the groups but the editorial sent a clear sign that the newspaper feels the government is failing in its duty to protect the media.
ARTICLE 19 reiterates its strong appeal to the Mexican authorities to guarantee the safety security of those who are exercising their right to freedom of expression, in accordance with Mexico’s international obligations. In particular, ARTICLE 19 appeals to Chihuahua state authorities and federal authorities to undertake prompt and effective investigations into the crimes and make information about the investigations available. ARTICLE 19 expresses its solidarity with the relatives, friends and colleagues of Luis Carlos Santiago Orozco, Armando Rodriguez and Josefina Reyes. • For more information please contact: Ricardo Gonzalez Freedom of Expression Programme Officer ricardo@article19.org, +52 55 1054 65 ext 102.
***08.09.2010. The Iraq War: The Heaviest Death Toll for the Media Since World War II, March 2003 – August 2010 (RSF)
Riyad Assariyeh, a 35-year-old journalist working for state-run Al Iraqiya TV, was shot dead by unidentified gunmen as he was leaving his home in Baghdad this morning (Sept 7). This clearly targeted murder brings to 15 the number of Al Iraqiya journalists who have been killed since Saddam Hussein’s removal.
Reporters Without Borders calls for a proper investigation capable of identifying and arresting both the perpetrators and instigators of this murder and bringing them to justice. It would be deplorable it this killing were to go unpunished, which unfortunately has been the case in 99 per cent of the 230 murders of journalists and media workers since the US-led invasion in 2003.
Two weeks after the U.S. Army’s last combat brigade withdrew from Iraq, Reporters Without Borders surveyed the country’s seven years of occupation by the coalition forces and their impact on press freedom. The aim of this report is to pay homage to all of the media professionals who gave their lives in order to keep the public informed, despite the risks they were taking.
Although the U.S. intervention in Iraq put an end to Saddam Hussein’s regime and paved the way for a major expansion of the Iraqi media, the human toll of the war, and the years of political and ethnic violence which followed, were nothing short of disastrous – too many people died.
The second U.S. war with Iraq was the most lethal for journalists since World War II. Reporters Without Borders tallied 230 cases of journalists and media staff killed in the country since the conflict broke out on 20 March 2003. That is more than those killed during 20 years of the Vietnam War or the civil war in Algeria.
In this report intitled “The Iraq War: A Heavy Death Toll for the Media,” Reporters Without Borders focuses on those journalists who were killed during the conflict simply because they wanted to do their jobs. Who were they? Which media outlets did they work for? Under what circumstances were they killed? Were they deliberately attacked? This is the third time that Reporters Without Borders has conducted such a study. The last one was released on 20 March 2006, on the occasion of the third anniversary of the American invasion of Iraq.
In this study, Reporters Without Borders also re-examines the issue of journalist abductions during the war: Iraq, with its more than 93 abducted media professionals, was for several years the biggest market for hostages in the world.
Suspected of collaborating with insurgent groups, Iraqi journalists were also frequently arrested during the war, either by the newly established Iraki administration, or by the U.S. Army. Some 30 journalists were arrested by the U.S. Army between March 2003 and August 2010, mainly in 2008. By early January 2006, Camp Bucca, the American detention centre in southern Iraq between the cities of Basra and Uum Qasr, had become the biggest prison for journalists in the Middle East.
To obtain a better grasp of the factors which contributed to this death toll, Reporters Without Borders produced several graphs showing diverse trends with regard to attacks on the media in Iraq since 2003 (Read the report on: www.rsf.org)
***02.09.2010. Palestinian Media in Gaza Strip was able to continue performing his duties despite the Israeli blockade
Ramallah- A study issued by the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) showed that despite the serious consequences of the continuing Israeli blockade effects on all aspects of the Palestinian life, including the media; however the media outlets were able to continue performing its duties.
The goals of the study which is entitled “The impact of the Israeli siege on media outlets in Gaza Strip”, prepared by Dr. Ahmad Hammad are to identifies the impact of the Israeli blockade on the performance of the Palestinian media, and the methods used by the occupation forces to prevent journalists and media institutions covering the events.
The study included the legal status of journalists and media institutions working in the Palestinian territories, and their right to be protected during the war.
The study stated that the media institutions in Gaza Strip suffer from the lack of press equipment by the non-entry of the necessary equipment for broadcasting, and other requirements for the journalistic work, as the embargo affects the printing and publishing as because of the shortage in inks and papers needed for printing, after the Israeli occupation forces prevented its entry into Gaza Strip.
The Israeli occupation forces also prevent the entry of the Palestinian newspapers issued in Ramallah and occupied Jerusalem for long periods; in addition, the prevention of fuel has affected the ability of journalists and media workers in mobility and movement. ------------------------------ Contact: Riham Abu Aita Public Relation Officer Ramallah riham@madacenter.org www.madacenter.org
***27.08.2010. THREATS AGAINST JOURNALISTS IN EASTERN NEPAL ALARM UN HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICIALS
United Nations human rights officials in Nepal are voicing concern over continued reports that journalists operating in the country’s eastern Terai districts are facing serious threats and intimidation.
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (www.ohchr.org/EN/Pages/WelcomePage.aspx) in Nepal issued a press statement yesterday from Biratnagar in which it said it had received at least nine reports of threats against journalists in that region since the start of May.
Many journalists have also told OHCHR that they increasingly feel insecure in Nepal, where a decade-long civil war that killed an estimated 13,000 people ended in 2006 with a peace accord. Political tensions still persist in the South Asian country.
“The situation jeopardizes the right to freedom of expression and the right to liberty and security of journalists, who are at the forefront in defending the rights of other peoples,” according to the press statement.
“Freedom of expression is fundamental in a society that respects human rights and is a core element of a democratic society.”
The office stressed the need for State authorities in Nepal to build an environment in which media professionals can feel they can carry out their work free of threat or intimidation.
***13.08.10. Mexico: Special Mandates Make Landmark Visit to Mexico
Following rigorous campaigning by ARTICLE 19, two Special Mandates on freedom of expression are currently in Mexico on a joint official visit. Catalina Botero, the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression for the Inter American Commission of Human Rights, and Frank la Rue, the UN’s Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression, are the first Special Mandates ever to visit Mexico. This unprecedented envoy is a severe indictment of the rapidly deteriorating freedom of expression situation in Mexico, which has witnessed increasing impunity to the violence being perpetrated against its media outlets. In the light of this international attention, ARTICLE 19 calls on the Mexican government to protect media workers throughout the country and ensure freedom of expression can be exercised by journalists.
The visit, petitioned for by ARTICLE 19 alongside a collective of national and international organisations, follows months of delays by Mexico’s government in effectively tackling the worsening situation. In spite of numerous statements and assurances, attacks against journalists have continued to increase and impunity has become the standard response.
August has been mired by several violent attacks on the media. At the beginning of the month, four journalists were kidnapped following their exposé of a corrupt penitentiary. Two were later liberated following an intense public outcry and the others rescued by federal police. Last week saw yet another brutal attack against a media outlet and there is no sign of a government response.
“The joint visit of the Special Mandates comes at a crucial time for Mexico” explained Dario Ramirez, Director of the Mexico and Central merica Office of ARTICLE 19. “We hope their visit will induce the State to provide the answers that have been constantly denied to victims and their relatives.”
ARTICLE 19 recommends that the Special Mandates address the following specific issues, pertaining to the protection of freedom of expression, during their mission:
• Protection: The urgent need to implement a policy to prevent aggressions against journalists, including the creation of a Protection Committee to provide emergency measures in a timely and diligent manner to journalists at risk.
• Impunity: All cases of aggression should be investigated fully; currently the majority of incidents fail to reach a Court of Law.
• Legal Reforms: Pending reforms, requesting all cases of aggressions against journalists are investigated at the federal level, should be passed immediately. In addition the Especial Prosecutor Office responsible for investigating aggressions must be strengthened.
• New Media Law: Crucially, a new media law is needed to effectively promote and protect diversity in all its forms and ensure a pluralism of voices.
• Defamation: A total of 16 local legal frameworks, out of 32, still punish defamation with jail. The full decriminalisation of defamation in Mexico must be made a priority.
ARTICLE 19 hopes that the Special Mandates will engage with these critical issues and that the Mexican government will respond quickly, and effectively, to the deteriorating situation.
***06.08.10. FIRST JOINT MISSION BY EXPERTS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES TO VISIT MEXICO
GENEVA – The UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, Frank La Rue, will undertake an official visit to Mexico from 9 to 24 August 2010 in what will be the first joint mission with the Organization of American States’ Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, Catalina Botero.
“We will carry out a wide-ranging assessment of the situation of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in Mexico, in particular issues related to the protection of journalists,” said Mr. La Rue, noting that no UN independent expert on freedom of expression has officially visited the country to date.
The main purpose of the mission is to “engage constructively with the Government to identify ways to ensure that all individuals can exercise their right to freedom of opinion and expression without fearing for their safety,” he added.
During their 16-day visit, the experts will visit Mexico City and the states of Chihuahua, Sinaloa, and Guerrero. They will meet with representatives of the Government, both at Federal and local levels, and with members of the legislature and the judiciary, as well as with non-governmental organizations, journalists, and other organizations and individuals working in areas related to their mandates.
The Special Rapporteur’s findings and recommendations will be reflected in his final report, which will be presented to the Human Rights Council in June 2011.
A press conference will be held at 4 p.m. on 24 August 2010, at Centro de Cultura Casa Lamm (Álvaro Obregón 99, Colonia Roma, Mexico City).
***04.08.10. IFJ Mourns Loss of Journalist Killed in Lebanon Border Clash
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today said that the killing of a journalist in clashes between Israeli and the Lebanese troops has highlighted the continuing dangers facing journalists trying to cover the world’s longest-running conflict. Assaf Abu Rahhal, working for Lebanon’s Al-Akhbar newspaper, was reportedly killed today in the fighting which erupted along the Israel-Lebanon border. He was killed when a shell landed next to him. A journalist working for the Lebanese TV outlet Al-Manar was wounded in the exchange of fire which left three Lebanese soldiers dead. “After years of relative calm, this outbreak of violence illustrates just how dangerous covering any corner of Arab-Israeli conflict can be,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “Journalists and media can never be safe as long as governments fail to respect their rights to report freely.” The media casualty is the first since freelance photographer Layal Najib was killed in the war between Hezbollah and Israel in 2006. “This killing is another tragic moment for media in a conflict that has provided many examples of the sacrifice that journalists make to cover this story,” said White. “It is ever-more important that all sides take note of the need to respect international law and the rights of non-combatants, including journalists.”
***27.07.2010. ICRC. How does international humanitarian law protect journalists in armed-conflict situations? Media professionals are increasingly at risk of being wounded, killed, detained or kidnapped while reporting in armed-conflict situations. Robin Geiss, an ICRC legal expert, talks about the protection to which they, as civilians not taking part in the fighting, are entitled under international humanitarian law.
Please go to the following link for the interview:
***26.07.2010. IRAQ. IFJ Condemns Impunity as Iraq Suicide Strike on Al-Arabiya Kills Six
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned a suicide bomb attack in Baghdad on the Arab satellite channel Al-Arabiya in which four employees and two members of the public were killed. The Federation says journalists remain prime targets for terrorists in Iraq and the government must act now to counter impunity in the killings of journalists. The suicide bomber blew up a vehicle at around 9.30am local time in front of the station's bureau in Baghdad's city centre, leaving a massive crater. Iraqi military spokesman Maj. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi said three guards and a cleaning woman were killed in the blast that left another 10 injured. "This attack comes after clear threats from terrorists that they intend to target media," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "It is a shocking incident that reinforces the concern over the dangers faced by journalists and media. More must be done to ensure the safety of all media personnel." The attack occurred a month after officials warned that insurgents opposed to the channel, which is funded from Saudi Arabia, planned to strike against the network. "This attack is a further challenge to the authorities," said White. "Previous killings of journalists have not been investigated or have been dealt with casually, creating an intolerable regime of impunity. The government must change its approach and ensure that the killers of journalists and media staff will be brought to justice." This is the latest in a series of attacks on Al-Arabiya. In September 2008, its Baghdad bureau chief, Jawad Hattab, escaped unharmed after spotting a bomb, which would-be assassins had attached to his car, before it was detonated by remote control. In October 2006, a car bomb targeting the channel's then bureau killed seven people and wounded 20. And in February 2006, Al-Arabiya presenter Atwar Bahjat and two colleagues were kidnapped and murdered in Samarra north of Baghdad over coverage of the bombing of a Shiite shrine, an attack by al-Qaeda that sparked a new round of sectarian bloodshed. "This attack puts a media perspective on the recent falling levels of violence against civilians," said Aidan White. "For all journalists and media staff, the dangers in reporting Iraq's tense political situation remain as great as ever."
***22.07.2010. SOMALIA: AMNESTY REPORT. Journalists under attack in Somalia as government steps up media crackdown
Amnesty International has called on Somali authorities and armed opposition groups in the country to respect freedom of expression amid a growing government crackdown on independent journalism.
A campaign of harassment and intimidation has seen a spate of arrests and interrogations of journalists since June. Media workers already face serious threats from armed groups, with 10 reporters killed in the last 18 months.
Amnesty International's new briefing paper, Hard News: Journalists' lives in danger in Somalia, launched on Somali Human Rights Day (22 July), documents the targeting of journalists in the country.
"Somali journalists are being prevented from informing the local population about daily violence that affects their lives - a service that is particularly vital in a conflict too dangerous for consistent international media reporting," said Michelle Kagari, Amnesty International's Africa deputy director.
"Somalia's authorities must investigate the attacks and harassment of journalists, both by armed groups and members of their own government, and ensure that freedom of expression is respected."
Somalia's internationally backed Transitional Federal Government (TFG) controls only a small part of the capital Mogadishu, while the rest of southern and central Somalia is under the control of armed groups.
The two largest are al-Shabab and Hizbul Islam, which are allied against the TFG but have also engaged in fighting against each other. While the armed groups are the most deadly threat to journalists in the country, media workers have come under increased pressure from the TFG in a recent clampdown on independent journalism.
On 26 June, New York Times correspondent Mohammed Ibrahim fled Somalia after threats from government security forces, following the publication of an article alleging that government forces included child soldiers.
On 29 June, several journalists were wounded when missiles were fired on a press conference being held by Al-Shabab in Mogadishu. Local journalists at the scene believe they were indirectly targeted by the TFG, who did not want the press conference to go ahead.
On 1 July, police detained journalist Mustafa Haji Abdinur and freelance cameraman Yusuf Jama Abdullahi for taking pictures of their colleague, photojournalist Farah Abdi Warsame, who had been hit in the crossfire during fighting in Mogadishu.
The journalists were interrogated and forced to delete their photographs. Warsame was only able to get medical treatment after being interrogated.
"Rather than protecting journalists from feared armed groups such as al-Shabab, the Somali authorities are increasing the problems for media workers by adding to the harassment they face," said Michelle Kagari.
Armed groups opposed to the Somali government now control many towns in the country. They have killed, harassed and intimidated journalists, shut down radio stations, restricted what local media can report on and frequently prevent journalists from publishing information which they believe is unfavourable towards them. This makes it almost impossible to disseminate vital information on the situation in Somalia.
On 5 May - the most recent journalist killing - three gunmen shot dead broadcast journalist Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey as he was returning home from the state-run Radio Mogadishu.
He was abducted by the gunmen near his home in southern Mogadishu and then shot repeatedly in the head. Members of al-Shabab claimed responsibility for the killing.
In 2009, nine journalists were killed, the highest total in any one year since 1991, when armed conflict broke out after the collapse of ex-President Siad Barre’s government.
In the first five months of 2010, in addition to the killing of one journalist, many more were abducted and harassed by armed groups.
The TFG was backed militarily by Ethiopian troops who remained in Somalia until early 2009. TFG officials and institutions are now protected by the African Union Mission in Somalia, AMISOM.
The TFG is opposed by a number of armed Islamist groups. Groups on both sides of the conflict often overlap, forge or shift alliances, or divide into separate groups.
***18.07.2010. ISRAEL. MADA condemns the Israeli attacks against journalists, and the security services raid of WATAN TV
The Israeli occupation forces continued their attacks on Palestinian journalists, whom covering the peaceful marches, where they threw tear gas and sound bombs at a group of journalists, on Friday, 16 July 2010, they include: Associated Press photographer Abdul Hafiz Hashlamoun, France Press Agency photographer Mousa Alshaér, Pal Media cameraman Samer Hamad, Maan News Agency photographer Luay Sababa, and Al-Quds TV cameraman Akram Natshe; while they were covering a peaceful march in the village of Alma’sara near Bethlehem city. Yesterday, 17 July 2010 The Israeli occupation forces attacked the photographers of: Agency France Press Hazem Bader, Reuters Agency Abdul Rahim Al-Aqusini, and Associated Press Abdul Hafiz Hashlamoun, as they also detained Associated Press photographer Iyad Hamad, while they were covering a peaceful march in the town of Beit Omar Near Hebron.
Hashlamoun said he went on Friday with a group of journalists to cover the weekly march of Alma’sara near the city of Bethlehem, where the Israeli army started throwing sound and gas bombs between the legs of journalists, causing them not to focus in photography and a serious bottleneck from gas smell. Hashlamoun added: "There were a group of Israeli soldiers their mission was to impede the journalist’s work and to evacuate them from the area."
"Yesterday was the fiercest against journalists", Al-Aqusini said - who is still lying in Al-Ahli Hospital in Hebron – who also said that he was standing with a group of photographers to cover the march of Beit Omar, during that time one of the Israeli soldiers throw a sound bomb from a close distance at him, so it hit him under his left ear, which caused him the loss of consciousness and a hole in his left eardrum and his main auditory nerve. Al-Aqusini added: "I’m still hearing a sensation in my ears and sometimes I feel the inability to focus".
Bader said: "Yesterday was very bad for journalists; we were targeted irectly by the officer and soldiers. Personally the officer threatened me then he beat me with a stick on my face and legs, causing me a wound in my nose and cheek and bruises on my left leg, and I wasn’t able to stand, the harder thing was when the officer prevented my colleagues from helping me. The officer also struck my colleague Hashlamoun with iron sound bomb on his back causing him bruises in the back. "
Form his part, Hamad said that the Israeli soldiers arrested him because he protested about the beating of his colleague Bader, where the soldiers took him and made him sit on the ground for two hours under the sun. During that the Israeli settlers who were in the area insulted and provoked him. The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) condemns the Israeli continued targeting of Palestinian journalists, especially during their coverage of the weekly marches in the West Bank. Since the violations have become a major threat to the lives of journalists and their safety. MADA also demands the international community and human rights organizations to intervene immediately to stop these attacks.
On the other hand MADA strongly condemns the raid of WATAN TV headquarters by members of the Palestinian security forces yesterday in Ramallah, after the television broadcast images of Hizb Al-Tahrir political party march, which was yesterday in Ramallah. WATAN director Muammar Orabi said that armed individuals in civilian clothes who identified themselves as security and intelligence members raided WATAN headquarters yesterday around 5:00 PM, demanding the arrest of the journalists who covered the march of Hizb Al-Tahrir, they also wanted to confiscate the tape that they have recorded. Orabi added: "After a verbal argument and some calls they have gone back and evacuated the building."
Contact: Riham Abu Aita - Public Relation Officer - Ramallah riham@madacenter.org www.madacenter.org
***29.06.2010. SOMALIA. NUSOJ Condemns bomb attack on 8 Journalists in Mogadishu
At least 8 journalists have been critically wounded in a bomb attack today Tuesday, 29 June 2010, which occurred at a police school in Abdiasis district of northern Mogadishu. The journalists were wounded after a bombardment in the police training facility where an Al-Shabaab spokesman was holding a press conference after they took over the base yesterday. The wounded journalists were covering the press conference.
Four of the wounded journalists have been identified as: Muse Mohamoud Jisow, Ilyas Ahmed Abukar, Abdinasir Idle, and Abdirisak Elmi Jama. One of the wounded journalists told the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) that the people who bombed the scene knew that a press conference was taking place and that journalists were in attendance.
NUSOJ has condemned the attack as wasteful and cowardly act that only targets the harmless journalists who are only armed with pens and cameras and notebooks. NUSOJ promised to soon distribute the complete list of names of the journalists injured in the blast and their respective media houses.
NUSOJ called on all parties in the conflict in Mogadishu to cease hostilities and to desist from taking their bloody conflict to the journalists and un-armed civilians.
“Warring sides have made it their habit to bombard or attack places with a congregation of journalists ostensibly to eliminate their enemy’s claims of political gains. But we must remind them of their responsibility to protect journalists and civilians. Once they commit such otherwise avoidable atrocities they then take their war to the people,” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary-General.
***29.06.2010. Rwanda: Pre-Election Violence and Intimidation Must Stop
ARTICLE 19 calls upon the Government of President Kagame to investigate all incidents of violence against activists, journalists and human rights defenders, in the lead up to Rwanda’s August elections, and ensure they are able to carry out their legitimate activities in safety.
Following the killing of Leonard Rugambage, deputy editor of “Umuvugizi” newspaper, on 24 June 2010, ARTICLE 19 is greatly concerned by increasing threats to activists and media workers in Rwanda, particularly those perceived to be critical of the Government. On the morning he was killed Rugambage published an online article alleging that the Rwandan Government was behind the attempted murder of one of their most outspoken critics, former General Faustin Kayumba, who is now lying critically injured inside a South African hospital. Shortly after 10 pm Rugambage was shot dead in his car.
“We condemn the killing of the late Leonard Rugambage and call upon the Government to ensure that those who committed this heinous act face justice. At the same time we wish to remind the authorities of their primary responsibility to provide security for the people of Rwanda” says Dr. Agnes Callamard, Executive Director, ARTICLE 19.
“The loss of life, under whatever circumstances, is deplorable and particularly troubling during what should be a democratic election. The continued intimidation of dissenting voices in Rwanda shows the extent of the current regime’s intolerance and prevents political commentary, directly limiting the ability of opposition parties to participate” adds Dr. Callamard.
ARTICLE 19 calls on Rwanda’s Government to bring those responsible for Rugambage’s death to justice without delay. In addition ARTICLE 19 appeals to the authorities to ensure that opposition voices are not excluded from Rwanda’s political process, compromising freedom of expression during a pivotal period in the country’s development.
***27.06.2010. RWANDA. JED demande aux autorités de lancer une enquête impartiale suite à l'assassinat de son correspondant.
Journaliste en danger (JED) condamne l'assassinat de Jean Léonard Rugambage, rédacteur en chef adjoint de "Umuvugizi", un journal paraissant à Kigali, capitale de la République du Rwanda et correspondant de JED au Rwanda. JED demande instamment aux autorités rwandaises de diligenter une enquête impartiale et crédible afin de faire toute la lumière autour de ce crime. En effet, JED craint que ceux qui auraient commis le forfait soient justement ceux-là qui conduisent les enquêtes.
JED estime que ce meurtre d'un journaliste courageux et respectable qui a refusé maintes fois de partir en exil en dépit de menaces sérieuses est un signal négatif de trop à l'approche des prochaines élections présidentielles.
Selon les informations recueillies par JED, Jean Léonard Rugambage a été tué, dans la nuit du jeudi 24 juin 2010, par des inconnus qui lui ont tirés quatre balles à bout portant devant son domicile dans le quartier populaire Nyamirambo à Kigali alors qu'il revenait, au volant de sa voiture, d'une visite familiale en province. Le 25 juin au matin, selon un journaliste local contacté par JED, la police aurait ramassé sur le lieu du crime quatre douilles.
Correspondant de JED au Rwanda depuis plusieurs années, Rugambage avait, dans son humour légendaire, le courage de ses idées et n'avait pas sa langue en poche au sujet des dérives totalitaires du pouvoir à Kigali. À la veille de sa mort tragique, il a publié sur le site du journal "Umuvugizi" un article dans lequel il a cité un haut responsable des services de sécurité rwandais qui aurait demandé à son chauffeur d'achever, en échange de récompense, le général Kayumba Nyamwasa (en exil en Afrique du Sud), hospitalisé après une tentative d’assassinat.
JED note également que Rugambage et son journal était depuis plusieurs mois la cible des autorités rwandaises. Le Haut conseil des médias (HCM), instance de régulation des médias au Rwanda, avait suspendu, le 13 mars 2010, "Umuvugizi" et "Umuseso", deux principaux journaux indépendants paraissant à Kigali pour une durée de six mois pour "incitation de l'armée et de la police à l'insubordination aux ordres de leurs chefs, publication d'informations portant atteinte à l'ordre public, diffusion de rumeurs ainsi que pour diffamation et immixtion dans la vie privée des gens".
***20.06.2010. Journalists in Exile 2010 - At least 85 journalists fled their home countries in the past year in the face of attacks, threats, and possible imprisonment. High exile rates are seen in Iran and in the East African nations of Somalia and Ethiopia (CPJ)
At least 29 Iranian editors, reporters, and photographers fled into exile over the past 12 months, the highest annual tally from a single country in a decade, a new survey by the Committee to Protect Journalists has found. CPJ also found a significant spike in the number of journalists fleeing violence and harassment in East Africa.
“My photos were seen as political criticism of clerics in Iran,” said photographer Mohammad Kheirkhan, who, like other Iranian journalists, went into exile after being harassed and interrogated by authorities for coverage of the unrest that followed the disputed 2009 presidential election. “The punishment for criticizing clerics is prison, torture, and even execution.”
Worldwide, at least 85 journalists fled their home countries over the past 12 months, CPJ found in its annual survey, which marks World Refugee Day, June 20, and highlights the plight of journalists who are forced to leave their homes in the face of attacks, threats, or the possibility of imprisonment. This year’s total, which counts journalists who went into exile from June 1, 2009 to May 31, 2010, is double the number recorded in the prior 12-month period. The tally is comparable to the decade’s previous high of 82, which CPJ recorded in 2007-08. Data on exiled journalists closely track other press freedom indicators such as deadly violence and the threat of imprisonment. The countries with the highest exile rates over the past 12 months—which include Ethiopia and Somalia, along with Iran—have long records of press repression.
“It wasn’t a single incident that pushed me to leave Ethiopia—it was numerous incidents over the course of several months,” said Mesfin Negash, who served as editor of the independent Ethiopian newspaper Addis Neger. Government security forces, intent on silencing criticism before the May 2010 elections, intimidated staff members and threatened criminal charges. Finally, Negash and several other staffers closed Addis Neger and fled the country. “We had hoped the harassment and intimidation would stop, but it never did because [the government] thought that if we stayed in Ethiopia we could influence the outcome of the elections.”
Hundreds of journalists in exile over the past decade
Since 2001, when CPJ began compiling detailed records on journalists in exile, more than 500 journalists have fled their homes. Illustrating the extraordinary dangers facing these journalists at home, 454 remain in exile today.
African journalists have been at particular risk throughout the past decade, but the exile rate tripled over the past 12 months. At least 42 African journalists, most of them from Somalia and Ethiopia, fled their homes in the past year. A majority sought refuge in Kenya and Uganda, where they hoped to resettle to a third country through the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The process can be lengthy as well as financially and emotionally grueling. “It is difficult to even plan when you are in this situation of exile and relocation,” said Negash, who has relocated elsewhere on the continent. “It is tormenting because everything is out of your control.”
Journalists find themselves in a legal limbo, unable to work and often the targets of ethnically motivated violence and police harassment. They live in a constant state of anxiety about the family members who are still back home. Negash’s exile has been devastating for his wife and mother, who depended on him but were forced to stay in Ethiopia when he fled. “It has been so difficult that sometimes I can’t even call them because they are so emotionally disturbed,” said Negash, who continues to help his family financially, sending whatever amounts he can spare from the small aid he receives from international organizations.
At least half of the Iranian journalists who fled this year are in a similarly precarious situation in Turkey. Several of those journalists told CPJ they have been approached by individuals they believe are working for the Iranian regime who have warned them that colleagues and relatives back home will suffer consequences if they discuss Iranian politics publically. Kheirkhan’s photographs of street protests were considered political criticism of Iranian clerics.
Kheirkhan, 24, whose photographs of the Iranian political unrest for United Press International were seen worldwide, had to travel through Afghanistan and Italy before resettling in the United States. “I wasn’t happy to be far away from my country, my family, and my friends,” he said when asked about his decision to petition for asylum. “But safety is the first thing that everybody must think about in his or her life.” He said he hopes to continue working as a journalist in California, where he now resides.
In exile, journalists face obstacles in continuing work
That will not be an easy path. CPJ research shows that less than a third of exiled journalists are able to continue to work in their profession. Throughout the world, exiled journalists face lengthy bureaucratic procedures as they establish their new legal status, along with significant language and cultural adjustments as they rebuild their lives. Many accomplished journalists are forced to take whatever employment opportunities are available.
Luis Horacio Nájera, a Mexican reporter with almost two decades of experience covering criminal gangs and political corruption, has been working as a janitor in Vancouver, Canada, since leaving his home country in 2008 in the face of death threats.
“It has been really hard to work here because no one recognizes my experience and I don’t speak English well,” he told CPJ in an interview conducted in Spanish. “There aren’t many opportunities, and you have to stand in a very long line of other refugees, so you end up doing things that you never thought you would have to—cleaning houses and washing bathrooms—because there is nothing else that you can do.” Nájera, above on assignment in Mexico, was an accomplished reporter in his home country. (Courtesy Luis Horacio Nájera)
Nájera and his family filed for asylum in 2009, and are awaiting an answer from Canadian authorities. If approved, Nájera said, he will study English, enroll in school, and find other work, although he does not think he will go back to journalism. Neither does he plan to return to Mexico. “I am very hurt with my country,” he told CPJ. “I did all that I could to help Mexico through my work as a journalist, and Mexico has not responded—it has not even been able to keep me and my family safe.”
Nearly 50 percent of journalists who have been forced into exile since 2001 have done so after being attacked or threatened with violence. Another 30 percent fled because of the possibility of imprisonment, while 20 percent left following prolonged harassment, CPJ research found.
Violence was the primary reason for an exodus of Iraqi journalists earlier in the past decade. As the death toll in Iraq has dropped to its lowest point since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, so too have the numbers of journalists seeking exile. CPJ documented just one Iraqi exile case in the past 12 months. Until this past year, Iraq had seen the largest single-year exodus of journalists.
CPJ’s survey counts only those journalists who fled due to work-related persecution, who remained in exile for at least three months, and whose current whereabouts and activities are known. It does not include the many journalists and media workers who left their countries for professional or financial opportunities, those who left due to general violence, or those who were targeted for activities other than journalism, such as political activism. Other groups using different criteria cite higher numbers.
***19.06.2010. PHILIPPINES - Two broadcasters killed in separate incidents (CMFR)
As the Arroyo administration neared the end of its term this June 30, two other broadcasters were killed in separate incidents in the regions of Northern Luzon (Region I) and Southern Mindanao (Region XI). If found to be work-related, these will raise the number of journalists/media practitioners killed in the line of duty during President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's watch rise to 78, more than twice the combined number of journalists killed in the terms of the three previous Philippine Presidents.
The Philippine National Police in both regions announced the formation of task forces to investigate the killing of radio broadcasters Desidario "Jessie" Camangyan in Manay town, Davao Oriental (June 14) and Jovelito Agustin in Laoag City, Ilocos Norte (June 15).
Camangyan, a blocktimer at Sunrise FM-Mati City, was killed at around 10 p.m. (local time) while hosting a singing competition in Old Macopa village, Manay town. Manay is a town in Davao Oriental, approximately 1,021 kilometers south of Manila.
In a 15 June 2010 interview, Philippine National Police Southern Mindanao spokesman Superintendent Querubin Manalang said initial police investigation showed that Camangyan had just taken his seat after introducing a contestant when the gunman came from behind him and shot him in the head.
Manalang said the suspect came and fled through the cornfield/plantation behind the makeshift stage.
Sunrise FM station manager Bobong Alcantara said Camangyan and his two co-hosts in "Hotline Patrol" had been invited by the village captain f Old Macopa to host the competition. But only Camangyan came. Camangyan was with his wife and his six-year-old son when he was shot.
Manalang, in a phone interview with the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility last June 15, said Police Task Force Camangyan is still looking into the possible motives in the killing of the broadcaster.
But members of the local media community say they believe the killing was work-related. Alcantara said the killing could be due to Camangyan and his partners' commentaries on illegal logging activities in the "east coast" of Davao Oriental. He said they have been receiving threats. The threesome had been discussing the problems of illegal logging in the province for almost four weeks now, Alcantara said.
"Hotline Patrol" is a blocktime program hosted by Camangyan, and his colleagues Frank Gupit and Nonoy Bacalzo.
In the northern part of Luzon, police have yet to complete their investigation into the killing of dzJC Aksyon Radyo's (Action Radio) anchor Jovelito Agustin. Agustin died at a local hospital a few hours after two unidentified men on a motorcycle shot him four times in Laoag City, the capital of Ilocos Norte.
Nick Malasig of dzJC said Agustin was driving home from the radio station on a motorcycle when the suspects intercepted and attacked him. Agustin had come from his daily public affairs show which usually dealt with problems in the province as well as election issues like the disqualification of some candidates. Ilocos Norte is a province approximately 402 kilometers north of Luzon.
The online news organization GMANews.TV reported that, according to Laoag City Police Chief Senior Superintendent Sterling Blanco, the nephew of Agustin who was riding home with him "could not give other details on the suspects."
Malasig told CMFR in a 16 June 2010 interview that Agustin said he ad received threats prior to the killing. In fact, some unidentified men shot at Agustin's house in Bacarra town during the campaign period for national and local elections last May. No one was hurt. Agustin had suspected a local politician as the one behind the shooting incident in May 2010.
Local and international media organizations have called for speedy investigations into the killings. Several groups also called on incoming Philippine President Benigno Simeon Aquino III to decisively act on the numerous killings and attacks against journalists, media practitioners and human rights activists.
***18.06.2010. UN EXPERT CALLS ON VENEZUELAN AUTHORITIES TO WITHDRAW ARREST WARRANT OF TV CHANNEL PRESIDENT AND SECURE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
GENEVA – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, Frank La Rue, urged the Venezuelan authorities to withdraw the arrest warrants against Guillermo Zuloaga, president of the private TV news channel Globovisión, and his son. “No Government in the world has the right to silence critics or those who oppose the State with criminal proceedings,” Mr. La Rue said.
“This latest act of harassment against Mr. Zuloaga is symptomatic of the continuous deterioration of freedom of the press in the country,” noted the independent expert mandated by the United Nations Human Rights Council to monitor the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression.
The Special Rapporteur said that he is troubled by the arrest warrants issued on 11 June 2010 by a prosecutor in Caracas against Mr. Zuloaga and his son, allegedly for business irregularities. It is feared that these warrants are politically motivated, aimed solely at silencing Mr. Zuloaga who has been critical of President Hugo Chavez.
“This is not the first time that staff members of Globovisión, including Mr. Zuloaga, are criminally prosecuted because of the exercise of their right to freedom of expression,” he said. Since 2001, Globovisión’s personnel have been subject to acts of harassment and intimidation, which in 2008 led the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to order provisional measures to protect its employees.
“I urge the Venezuelan Government to take all necessary steps to secure the right to freedom of opinion and expression of all persons, in accordance with fundamental principles as set forth in article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and recalled in article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights*, to which Venezuela is a party,” stressed the Special Rapporteur.
“I would like to reiterate my request to visit Venezuela in order to make an in-depth assessment on the ground of the state of freedom of expression and freedom of the press in the country,” Mr. La Rue said. “This request regrettably remains unanswered.”
***17.06.2010. KYRGYZSTAN: MEDIA OUTLETS INCINERATED; TOO DANGEROUS TO REPORT - PEC CONDEMNS ATTACKS AGAINST UZBEK MEDIA (IFEX/RSF/PEC)
An estimated 2,000 have been killed in interethnic violence in Kyrgyzstan since 10 June, say news reports. In response to the unrest, authorities in the southern city of Osh ordered local television stations to cease transmission, report the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF). The Public Association of Journalists (PAJ), based in Bishkek, is currently working to provide humanitarian assistance to journalists in the southern part of the country.
Violence first erupted between Uzbek and Kyrgyz youth in Osh on 10 June, leading to major riots. Armed gangs drove through neighbourhoods in Osh and Jalal-Abad, setting houses and stores on fire and shooting at people trying to escape, report Human Rights Watch and CPJ. In response, the government declared a curfew and sent security forces to the region, granting shoot-to-kill authority. News reports say tens of thousands of ethnic Uzbeks have fled the two cities and crossed the border into Uzbekistan to escape the violence.
Meanwhile, local media are being trampled by the fallout of the revolution. Osh residents now only have access to state television channel KTR and several Russian television channels, reported the independent news agency Zpress. Mezon TV and Osh TV were stopped from broadcasting, says the independent news site "Ferghana". The buildings of Osh TV and JTR TV in Osh and Jalal-Abad were burnt down, reports International Media Support (IMS).
PAJ and IMS are working to deliver food and medical supplies to about 100 journalists and their families in the Osh and Jalal-Abad regions. Media coverage of events in the southern part of the country is limited as journalists fear attacks while reporting in the streets.
(RSF) - As violence continues, the media are increasingly being prevented from working in the south of Kyrgyzstan. News is being reported only sporadically as infrastructure is targeted and journalists obstructed by clashes.
Initially, local television stations in Osh were targeted. TV Osh, Mezon and Akhborot were ransacked, with the second two torched and wrecked, leaving computers and databases unusable. All three stations are Uzbek-language, targeted since the start of the clashes.
Before the events of 10 June, a large number of journalists were attending a seminar in Osh. In the current chaos, it is not known how many of them have been evacuated and which media they were working for. Concordant sources confirm that media in the south of the country have been advising their journalists to stay at home and not to put themselves in danger by covering the situation. Local and foreign journalists do not or rarely venture into the urban Uzbek areas for fear of being attacked.
Some news is filtering out however through journalists reporting from their windows on the current state of the troubles. They are also managing to send news to websites such as ferghana.ru, by telephone.
In Uzbekistan, on the other side of the border, which has now been closed, Reporters Without Borders voiced its relief at the news of the release on 16 June of prominent freelance Uzbek journalist, Alexei Volossevich.
Police arrested Volossevich on 13 June when he came to cover the arrival of hundreds of refugees of Uzbek origin, fleeing from neighbouring Kyrgyzstan. He was placed in a detention centre for people without ID or fixed address (His papers were in a bag that he did not have the time to grab at the moment of his arrest). The authorities said they would release him as soon as they had checked his identity. Although his colleagues brought his passport the following day, he was not freed until 16 June.
Reporters Without Borders welcomes the release of Alexei Volossevich, but regrets that the authorities prevented him from doing his work. Even in the current situation, the government of Islam Karimov has not let up in its attacks on journalists. The arrest and detention of Volossevich could be seen as a warning to all journalists seeking to cover these events. Could this be a continuation of the campaign against the press that saw an upsurge in January this year?
***04.06.2010. ISRAEL. IFJ Demands Inquiry as One Journalist Is Confirmed Dead in Gaza Ships Attack
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), with the backing of its affiliate in Israel, today called for a special inquiry into the killing of a journalist and injuries to others during the Israeli assault on a flotilla of ships carrying humanitarian aid which took place on June 1. "We now know that one journalist died and at least one other is seriously injured in horrifying circumstances that remain unexplained," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "We are also gathering information about the treatment of journalists and the confiscation of their material, all of which raises new concerns about the violations of their rights." The IFJ says that a specific inquiry into the treatment of journalists is required because around 100 of the people detained by the Israeli authorities were thought to be journalists from across the globe including Australia, Algeria, Jordan, Turkey, Greece, the UK, Italy, Iran, Germany, South Africa, Indonesia, Malaysia ,Pakistan and UAE. The media victims are Turkish journalist Cevdet Kiliclar, killed by a shot in the head, and Indonesian cameraman Sura Fachrizaz who was shot in the chest and seriously injured. Fachrizaz is in a hospital in Haifa and his injuries are not considered life threatening. The IFJ is in touch with reporters involved as well as a number of unions representing media staff and is compiling information on material that has been confiscated by the Israeli authorities. Marcello Faraggi, a journalist who was on board the Mediterranean Sea, a cargo ship which was part of the aid convoy and was later detained in the Israeli prison of Bersheva, told the IFJ that journalists were subjected to body search and stripped of their equipment during their detention. A special information collection point has been established to prepare a dossier on the incident which will form the basis of journalists' claims for compensation in the aftermath. The IFJ affiliate in Israel, the National Federation of Israel Journalists (NFIJ), which has been assisting journalists and gathering information, should also be involved in any inquiry into the treatment of journalists, says the IFJ. The NFIJ section in Jerusalem, the Journalists Association in Jerusalem, has specifically urged the Israeli government to give back immediately all the equipment that was confiscated from the journalists on the boats. "Journalists on duty should be left out of any confrontation and should have the full freedom to cover the events in a professional way," they said in a statement. Further concerns have been raised about the broadcasting by Israeli authorities of material confiscated from journalists which is being used to project their version of events. "This is shocking disregard for the rights of journalists," said White. The confiscation and then unauthorized use of journalists' footage shows the contempt that the Israeli authorities have for journalism."
***02.06.2010. ISRAEL. At least 60 journalists were aboard flotilla, most still held (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders reiterates its urgent appeal to the Israeli authorities to release the journalists who were accompanying the Gaza-bound humanitarian flotilla that was intercepted on 31 May. According to the latest information available to the press freedom organisation, at least 60 journalists were aboard.
“We point out that the journalists were there to do their job, which was to cover what happened,” Reporters Without Borders said. “They should not be confused with the activists. Three hundred of the flotilla’s passengers are about to be deported but journalists are still being held. We call on the Israeli authorities to free all the detained journalists and return their equipment, which was seized by the military.”
Three hundred passengers are currently at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion airport, from where they are to be deported today. Some journalists are among them.
Reporters Without Borders has also learned that the Al Jazeera crew that was aboard the flotilla, including correspondent Abbas Nasser and cameraman Isaam Zaatar, was expelled yesterday.
Reporters Without Borders is aware of 16 journalists being held at Be’er Scheva detention centre. They are Svetoslav Ivanov and Valentin Vassilev of Bulgaria’s BTV, Muna Shester of the Kuwait News Agency, Talat Hussain of Aaj TV, Paul McGeough and Kate Geraghty of the Sydney Morning Herald, Mario Damolin of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, David Segarra of teleSUR, Ayse Sarioglu of Taraf, Murat Palavar and Hakan Albayrak of Yeni Safak, Sümeyye Ertekin, Ümit Sönmez and Ersin Esen of TVNET and Ashwad Ismail and Samsul Kamal Abdul Latip of Astro Awani.
Reporters Without Borders has tried repeatedly to get in touch with them, so far without success.
***01.06.2010. ISRAEL: Israel needs to heed international calls for free flow of information (Article 19)
ARTICLE 19 is calling for an open, international, independent and impartial investigation into the use of lethal force by the Israeli Defence Forces which resulted in a number of deaths onboard the Gaza-bound flotilla on 31 May.
The blocking of all communication channels, including mobile phones, shortly after the assault, followed by the arbitrary detention of journalists, human rights monitors and others who were travelling onboard the flotilla, are evidence of censorship and a news blackout by Israeli state authorities. Such actions curtail the free flow of information, as protected by Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil on Political Rights to which Israel is party.
The one-sided information originating from official Israeli sources on the circumstances surrounding the assault and the deaths restricts the right to information and minimises the possibilities for international public scrutiny of the actions of the Israeli Defence Forces and thus for accountability.
As early as 1946, at its very first session, in the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 59(I) which states that “Freedom of information is a fundamental human right and ... the touchstone of all the freedoms to which the United Nations is consecrated.”
Freedom of expression, including access to information, is also essential to the realization of what is commonly referred to as the “right to truth.” The UN Commission on Human Rights, at its 61st session, adopted Resolution 2005/66, which ‘‘Recognizes the importance of respecting and ensuring the right to the truth so as to contribute to ending impunity and to promote and protect human rights.’’
The investigation into the assault against the flotilla must be open, international, impartial and independent. It should focus on the legality of the Israeli assault in international waters and thus the legality of the blockade, and the proportionality of the use of force. An international investigation team should be allowed access to government-held information on the matter, as well as direct access to those involved in the assault, witnesses and those subsequently detained.
***01.06.2010. IFJ Calls for Immediate Release of Journalists Detained by Israeli Military
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called upon the Israeli authorities to release without delay all journalists and media staff who were detained on board the Gaza bound aid convoy on Monday morning. Up to a hundred journalists are believed to be among the passengers currently being held by the Israeli Defence Forces. "The Israeli authorities must not play cat and mouse with professional journalists who are doing their job, not just for the company they serve but in the service of a worldwide audience," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. The Israeli authorities have given reassurances that they will treat all professional journalists the same way as politicians who accompanied the flotilla and seek their early release and deportation. Reports state that up to ten people were killed and many more injured during clashes between the military and passengers when the flotilla was boarded by the Israeli Defence Forces in the early hours of Monday morning. " We are grateful for the tremendous efforts being made by leaders of the National Federation of Israeli Journalists to defend the rights of working professionals who have been caught up in this series of tragic events," added White. " We will continue to work with our Israeli affiliate and others who have expressed concern about the detention of their journalists and media staff."
***31.05.2010. IFJ Condemns Gaza Attack and Demands International Inquiry after Reports of Media Casualties
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today reacted with shock at the news of the brutal attacks on civilians, including journalists, by Israeli forces in the assault on a flotilla that yesterday tried to breach the military blockade of the Gaza coastline in Palestine. The IFJ said that reports of casualties - including possible deaths of media staff - were unconfirmed and a curtain of secrecy drawn around the incident by the Israeli authorities was increasing anxiety among friends and relatives. The IFJ is calling for an urgent and comprehensive international investigation into the incident and for the information blackout to be lifted. "We join the European Union in demanding a full inquiry which must be independent in order to be credible. We condemn any attempt at the blackout and censorship of news by the Israeli authorities which is hindering journalists from giving an accurate account of what is happening," said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. The IFJ believes that 20 journalists and media staff from a number of different countries were on board when the attacks took place, according to Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. He said the IFJ is fully investigating the incident and plans to raise the issue at a special meeting of the United Nations Human Rights Council planned in Geneva on Wednesday. The IFJ is also writing today to the Israeli government warning them about their responsibility vis-à-vis the security of the journalists on the flotilla and is asking its member union in Israel to take the matter up with the authorities. "The international community must respond immediately to this outrage," said White. "The rights of journalists in conflict zones have been particularly highlighted by the United Nations and members states cannot stand by when one state acts in a reckless and dangerous manner."
***20.05.2010. Thailand: Attacks on Media Must Stop (Article 19)
Following the surrender of “Red Shirt” leaders and the imposing of curfew in Bangkok, all sides must stop attacking the media in order to allow the media to report freely on the development of the crisis. The media must also uphold the professional standards of objectivity to gain public trust and credibility.
Protests across Thailand have continued today following weeks of growing conflict. Yesterday the Thai army surrounded and used live arms to disperse protesters calling for the dissolving of parliament and announcing early elections, killing many. Members of the Red Shirts, largely consisting of rural poor, have in recent weeks targeted national media houses claiming that they are biased towards the urban elite. The government, on the other hand, has blocked around 4,500 websites and former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s Twitter feed amongst other censorship measures.
On Wednesday, the Red Shirts stormed national TV station Channel 3 and set cars on fire. Journalists at The Bangkok Post and The Nation also evacuated their building in fear of their safety. Following the crackdown, some protestors also turned on the media, threatening photographers taking pictures of retreating Red Shirts in particular.
The crisis has taken a heavy toll on journalists. International and national journalists have been killed and injured in the course of the crisis. In Wednesday’s army crackdown, Fabio Polenghi, an Italian photojournalist was killed by gunshot. He is the second journalist to have lost his life after Japanese cameraman for Reuters, Hiroyuki Muramoto, who was fatally shot on 10 April. At least five other international journalists from the Netherlands, USA, Canada and the UK, and a Thai photographer working for Australian Broadcasting Corporation have been injured thus far. Besides journalists working for foreign media, two local newspaper photographers - one working for Matichon and the other for The Nation – also suffered injuries in recent clashes.
“Such attacks, as well as threats to journalists and media censorship, seriously undermine a free media environment much needed at this critical moment when the public needs updated information from all sources to understand the situation,” says Dr Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director.
ARTICLE 19 calls on both sides to end the attacks on journalists and media censorship, and to ensure the right to information and right to expression are not compromised.
ARTICLE 19 also urges journalists to adhere to the professional standards of reporting, upholding objectivity and refraining from inciting violence.
***20.05.2010. THAILAND: BANGKOK ABLAZE; TWO JOURNALISTS KILLED AND SEVERAL OTHERS WOUNDED (IFEX)
Downtown Bangkok has spiralled into a flaming battleground after close to two months of anti-government protests, with at least 39 dead, including two journalists killed in clashes, and hundreds wounded. Thai troops broke through the encampment of red shirts today, cracking down on the movement and triggering more violence, report the Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA) and other IFEX members. The media have taken a heavy toll - several media outlets were targeted or closed down to protect staff, and other journalists have been shot and wounded. The government has imposed a night-time curfew across the country.
Although several red shirt leaders surrendered and called off the protests, protesters reacted by setting fire to the stock exchange, Southeast Asia's second-biggest department store complex, banks, and attacking newspaper offices and a television station. The protests have now spread to northeast Thailand where demonstrators torched more buildings.
Throughout this red shirt fury over social injustice, the media has been under constant attack from all sides. The government has tried to control the flow of information by blocking websites, and shutting down satellite TV channels that it claims were inciting violence and promoting red shirt propaganda. Journalists and media outlets have been attacked by protesters who accused the media of biased coverage.
Italian photojournalist Fabio Polenghi died after being shot in the chest during the recent offensive, and at least three demonstrators were killed. A Dutch reporter Michel Maas and a US documentary filmmaker suffered from gunshot wounds. The army shoots "everything that's moving and don't ask if you are a reporter before shooting," said Maas. Another journalist was wounded in a grenade attack in the capital on 19 May.
Rioters set fire to the Channel 3 building, a government TV station, and set 10 news vehicles ablaze, reports SEAPA. Several media organisations, including the "Bangkok Post" and "The Nation", sent staff home, fearful that mobs would attack the compounds.
"About 100 employees of the Channel 3 TV station were trapped on the roof of their high-rise office, but most were later rescued by helicopter," reports "The Guardian". Meanwhile, radio stations sympathetic to the red shirts have aired "incendiary commentary," says SEAPA.
After government troops cordoned off the protesters' site by cutting off water and electricity and setting up roadblocks to prevent red shirts from joining their comrades last week, three journalists were wounded in skirmishes on 14 May. Canadian journalist Nelson Rand, working for France 24 TV channel, was shot three times. Subin Namchan, a photographer for the Thai-language newspaper, "Matichon", and Supawat Wanchantha, cameraman for Thai Voice TV Channel, were both shot in the legs. The next day, Thai reporter Chaiwat Poompuang, working for "The Nation", was also shot in the leg while covering clashes.
On 13 May, "International Herald Tribune" reporter Thomas Fuller narrowly missed being killed when a sniper fired a bullet into the head of a red shirt rebel commander whom he was interviewing. On 10 April, Reuters journalist Hiro Muramoto was shot and killed while covering fighting between protesters and security forces.
Attacks on the press "will ultimately deprive Thais of the information, news and commentary they need to understand and navigate these perilous days," said SEAPA. The press freedom organisation is also urging journalists to not take sides and to provide reliable information.
***17.05.2010. ALERT THAILAND. THE PRESS EMBLEM CAMPAIGN (PEC) GRAVELY CONCERNED: JOURNALISTS INJURED DURING BANGKOK CLASHES
Safety issues raised as casualties among journalists covering Bangkok clashes increase (SEAPA/IFEX/PEC - 17.05.2010)
Journalists covering the renewed clashes between Thailand's security forces and the anti-government Red Shirt protesters have found themselves literally caught in the crossfire.
SEAPA maintains its stand that the violence directed against the media in Thailand is indefensible. These attacks will victimize not only the press, but also the Thai public in general, which both need free media, unintimidated journalists, and a healthy environment for news, commentary, and information to help understand and determine their options especially in these days of crisis.
As of Sunday, 16 May 2010, 33 people have already been killed with 239 injured, according to the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration's Emergency Health Service Center.
Of this number, five journalists were wounded by gunfire as troops fought with protesters after the government gave out orders to cordon off the protesters' rally site in Ratchaprasong intersection on Thursday night. Power and water supplies were cut off, Skytrain and subway lines were stopped and roadblocks set up to prevent more Red Shirts from reinforcing their comrades in Bangkok's commercial district. The Center for Resolution of Emergency Situation (CRES) also announced that soldiers are now authorized to fire live rounds one shot at a time in case the use of rubber bullets to dissuade armed protesters would prove to be ineffective. The troops, the government said, are to shoot only at the legs of any resisting protesters.
However, three journalists on Friday, 14 May, found themselves shot in the leg when they covered the skirmishes in Wireless Road, Bangkok's Embassy Row, which runs parallel to Lumpini Park, occupied by the protesters since 12 March.
Canadian national Nelson Rand, who works for France 24 TV channel, was shot three times - in the abdomen, in one of his legs and another in one of his wrists. He was rushed to Chulalongkorn Hospital where he underwent surgery.
Subin Namchan, a photographer of the Thai-language newspaper, "Matichon", sustained a gunshot wound in the thigh at the Sarasin-Wireless intersection. He was brought to Bumrungrad Hospital.
Meanwhile, Supawat Wanchantha, cameraman for Thai Voice TV Channel was also shot in the leg and was brought to Rama 9 Hospital.
Witnesses said some of the injured journalists were covering the action near the lines of the protesters. It is not clear, however, if the three journalists - all sustaining a gunshot wound in the leg - were deliberately shot or were just victims of stray bullets.
The following day, Chaiwat Poompuang, a veteran photojournalist of "The Nation" newspaper, was shot in the leg when he was covering the fighting at the Din Daeng intersection near Ratchapraprop Road between some 300 Red Shirts and the soldiers manning the barricade.
On Sunday, 16 May, a PTV cameraman's life was saved by the bulletproof vest he was wearing while lying on the ground at around 4 pm near the Lumpini Tower in Rama 4 Road. Phutthapong Chusaeng said he felt a severe pain in his back when the bullet impacted his vest. His colleague from another TV station, Thai PBS, said the bullet did not pierce the vest.
These incidents underline the physical dangers faced by journalists in the on-going political crisis in the Thai capital, which started on 12 March this year. On 13 May Thursday, a reporter for the "New York Times" came within a hair's breadth of death on Lumpini Park near Rama 4 Road when the man he was interviewing, renegade Maj. Gen. Katthiya Sawasdipol alias "Seh Daeng", was hit in the right temple by a bullet fired by a sniper.
Thai reporters have started wearing safety equipment like ballistic helmets and bulletproof vests in the aftermath of the violent April 10 dispersal of the Red Shirts in Ratchdamnoen Road. Japanese journalist Hiro Muramoto, who worked as a cameraman for British news agency Reuters, was killed after he was shot in the chest.
A freelance photographer for ABC news, Winnai Ditthajorn, suffered from a gunshot wound to his left leg in the same incident.
Thai reporters and photographers have lobbied their respective media employers to equip them with these two items as fighting between the troops and the protesters continued to heat up. Sources said that it came to a point where some journalists even threatened to stop their news coverage if not issued a helmet and a vest.
Prior to this, the only protection the journalists had was a green armband distributed by the Thai Journalists Association (TJA) identifying the wearer as a member of the media.
The TJA has repeatedly issued statements the past months calling on both parties to spare journalists from threats, harassment and physical attacks while they are covering the political conflict.
In the aftermath of these recent shooting incidents, the TJA and the Thai Broadcast Journalists Association (TBJA) called on journalists to exercise caution during coverage and urged them to look first after their own safety.
SEAPA observed in a prior press statement that the attacks on journalists "serve no purpose but to intimidate all media practitioners, and will ultimately deprive Thais the information, news, and commentary they need to understand and navigate these perilous days".
However, even the reporters' abode is increasingly at risk, too. An AFP photographer, Pedro Ugarte, said that the hotel he was staying in, the Dusit Thani Hotel on Rama 4 Road, sustained bullet hits and several rounds from what were believed to be rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) at dawn of 17 May, forcing the hotel to ask its guests to check out at noon for their own safety. Foreign correspondents billeted in a nearby hotel had also reportedly checked out earlier due to increased dangers brought on by the fighting.
As of press time, the CRES issued an ultimatum to the remaining protesters, especially women, children and the elderly, in Ratchaprasong to leave the area even as it braces for a determined resistance from the hardcore elements of the Red Shirts. The TJA and TBJA also called on the media to pull out of the protest zones and other areas declared as "illegal" by the CRES for their own safety.
Three journalists injured in Bangkok clashes (IPI - 14 May 2010)
(IPI) - Vienna, 14 May 2010 - Three journalists have been injured in clashes between government forces and protesters in Bangkok, Thailand.
The injured journalists - Nelson Rand, a Canadian working for broadcaster France 24; a local journalist working for Thai newspaper Matichon and a cameraman working for Thai broadcaster Voice TV - were injured in separate outbreaks of violence in the Thai capital today, according to media reports. Rand was reportedly shot thrice, in the leg, abdomen and wrist, and is reported to be in "serious condition."
Thai news outlet The Nation reports that protesters briefly surrounded a mobile van belonging to broadcaster Channel 3, alleging that the station's broadcasts were biased against the protestors, called "Red Shirts." The protesters dispersed after a discussion with the news staff and no one was hurt in the incident.
Journalists on the micro-blogging site Twitter, which has emerged as one of the most current sources of information on the protests, warned of attempts being made to steal cameras from photographers.
On Thursday, Thomas Fuller, a reporter for the International Herald Tribune, described how opposition figure Maj. Gen. Khattiya Sawasdipol was shot in the head as Fuller was interviewing him. Fuller told CNN that he was standing only a few feet away from Sawasdipol when he was shot. Sawasdipol was transported to hospital and is in grave condition.
"Journalists covering the clashes in Thailand at the moment are extremely vulnerable to danger," said IPI Director David Dadge. "We ask soldiers and protestors to respect the independence of the media and to ensure that they do not become targets for violence in this volatile environment."
Earlier this week, IPI reported that over a month after Reuters cameraman Hiro Muramoto was killed in clashes between anti-government protesters and security forces in Thailand's capital, Bangkok, officials have yet to identify his killers.
Citing the current political tension in Thailand, editor of The Nation, Tulsathit Taptim, suggested at the time that the government may have chosen to not yet reveal the results of any murder investigation to avoid inciting further violence and, possibly, because the information may be inconvenient or embarrassing for the government.
"It is very difficult for any independent investigation to be conducted under these circumstances," Taptim said. "Any outcome would be politicised and used by one side or the other."
The deepening political crisis in the country has resulted in at least four deaths today, according to media sources, and over 30 people are said to have died in the clashes between the Red Shirts and government soldiers.
The wave of protests against the government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva began on 12 March when Red Shirt protesters took to the streets. Three days later, demonstrators splashed blood under the gates of Government House in a sign of protest against the current leadership.
The government responded by blocking several websites and an opposition broadcaster People TV.
The Red Shirts do not recognise Abhisit Vejjajiva's leadership, charging that the prime minister came to power illegitimately following the 2006 coup against former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.
Who are firing the shots that are injuring journalists? (RSF 16.05.2010)
Reporters Without Borders called on the Thai Army and the Red Shirts to guarantee the safety of journalists covering ongoing clashes in Bangkok after three reporters were injured: a cameraman for France 24, a photographer for Thai newspaper Matichon, and a photographer for the Thai daily The Nation.
“The confusion reigning in various parts of Bangkok do not suffice to explain the shooting injuries sustained by several Thai and foreign journalists since April,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Both camps must comply fully with the requirements of international law, according to which journalists cannot be military targets. We also call for an investigation to establish who gave the orders to shoot a rebel general as he was being interviewed by journalists.”
The press freedom organisation added: “We note that Thailand has just got itself elected to the United Nations Human Rights Council, and we urge the government to guarantee the safety of civilians and put an end to news censorship, in particular, the blocking of the Prachatai website.”
Nelson Rand, a Canadian reporter employed by the French TV news station France 24, was badly injured today by automatic gunfire near the Suan Lum night bazaar. Cyriel Payen, France 24’s Bangkok bureau chief, said he was hit in an exchange of shots between soldiers and Red Shirts. A photographer with the Thai newspaper Matichon also sustained a gunshot injury in the same place.
“He underwent a very long operation and came out of the operating room at about 6 pm,” Payen said about Rand. “He is slowly recovering consciousness. He was hit three times by shots from an assault rifle. Once in the leg, causing the loss of a lot of blood. Once in the abdomen and once in the hand, causing multiple fractures. The doctors say his condition is now stable.”
A third journalist, working for The Nation, Chaiwat Pumpuang, was shot in the right leg on 15 May as the army tried to disperse Red Shirts blocked a road at Din Daeng in Bangkok. Continued shooting in the area prevented the photographer from being taken to hospital for half an hour.
A journalist working for Voice TV, a Thai cable station that supports the Red Shirts, was also reportedly injured in Bangkok. Red Shirt protesters harassed a TV crew working for Thailand’s Channel 3, accusing them of supporting the government. After an argument, the journalists were able to leave the scene.
Hiroyuki Muramoto, a Japanese cameraman working for the Reuters news agency, was fatally shot and a France 24 cameraman was injured in clashes in Bangkok on 10 April. The results of the official investigation into Muramoto’s death have still not been released.
Reporters Without Borders is also shocked by the methods used by the army to eliminate the pro-Red Shirt general Khattiya Sawasdipol, who was shot in the head yesterday while being interviewed by International Herald Tribune reporter Thomas Fuller. Another journalist who was there said the shot appeared to have been fired by a sniper.
Fuller told CNN: “I was facing him, he was answering my questions, looking at me and the bullet hit him in the forehead, from what I could tell. It looks like the bullet came over my head and struck him.”
***10.05.2010. HONDURAS. VIOLENCE AGAINST JOURNALISTS: UNITED NATIONS EXPERTS CALL UPON HONDURAS TO PROTECT MEDIA STAFF
GENEVA – A group of United Nations human rights experts* called upon the Honduran Government to take urgent action to address the increasing vulnerability faced by journalists operating in the country. In the past six weeks, seven journalists have been killed, and several others have been threatened, reportedly for their activities in defence of human rights in the country.
“We urge the Government to take all necessary measures to thoroughly investigate these killings and threats, prosecute those responsible, and ensure the physical and psychological integrity of all journalists under threats”, the independent experts said. “In particular, we call upon the Government to establish an independent inquiry aimed at shedding lights on these issues, as well as at identifying measures that could be taken to better protect journalists and prevent the occurrence of such acts in the future”.
Journalists José Bayardo Mairena Ramírez, Manuel Juárez, Nahun Palacios Arteaga, David Meza Motesinos, Joseph Hernández Ochoa, Luis Antonio Chévez Hernández and Jorge Orellana “recently lost their lives while exercising their legitimate right to freedom of opinion and expression”, stressed the United Nations Special Rapporteurs.
Several journalists continue to receive death threats, despite precautionary measures ordered by the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights to protect journalists in Honduras.
“Journalists play a critical role in strengthening human rights through their work”, the independent experts said. “Silencing them not only curtails freedom of opinion and expression, but also jeopardizes the enjoyment of all rights and freedoms of society as a whole.”
“We call on the Honduran authorities to take all necessary steps to protect the right to life and secure the right to freedom of opinion and expression of all persons, including journalists and human rights activists, in accordance with articles 6 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, the Special Rapporteurs said. “The international community will closely scrutinize the response of the Government to this tragic situation.”
(*) Frank la Rue, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the rights to freedom of opinion and expression; Mr. Philip Alston, Special Rapporteur on summary, extrajudicial or arbitrary executions; and Ms. Margaret Sekaggya, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders.
***06.05.2010. PAKISTAN. Twenty-six IFEX members join the Pakistani Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) in condemning suicide bombings
Twenty-six IFEX members and the PFUJ appeal to the leaders of the Taliban, to the jihadist movements and to Al-Qaeda in Pakistan to put a stop to all further suicide bombings in public gatherings:
"We, the undersigned journalists of Pakistan and defenders of free expression around the world, condemn with the utmost firmness all recourse to suicide bombings in the middle of crowds of civilians that result in the deaths of innocent people including media workers.
In April, two fellow-journalists working for Samaa TV were killed in the space of two days in suicide bombings in Pakistan. They were both covering stories at the time and paid with their lives for doing their duty to report the news. These bombings have made Pakistan one of the world’s most dangerous countries for the press.
As the Pakistani Muslim scholar Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri said in March, there is no place for the martyr in Islam. In a 600-page fatwa, he did not hesitate to describe the perpetrators and instigators of suicide bombings as enemies of Islam.
"They cannot claim that their suicide bombings are martyrdom operations and that they become the heroes of the Muslim umma [Islamic community]," Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri said. "No, they become the heroes of hellfire and they are leading towards hellfire. There is no place for any martyrdom and their act is never, ever to be considered jihad [holy struggle]."
As journalists, we have to cover official events first hand but that does not mean that we support any specific politician or public figure. By targeting large gatherings, the organisations that use suicide bombings are endangering the lives of innocent civilians and reporters. This is not acceptable.
We appeal with the utmost urgency to the leaders of the Taliban in Pakistan, to the jihadist movements and to Al-Qaeda in Pakistan to put a stop to all further suicide bombings in public gatherings.
We can no longer accept that our fellow journalists lose their lives."
***05.05.2010. SOMALIA. NUSOJ Condemns Assassination of Veteran Journalist in Mogadishu
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) today condemned the mindless and merciless targeted assassination of veteran journalist, Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey, in Mogadishu, on Tuesday night, 4 May 2010.
Hooded men with pistols followed the late journalist Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey, 52, who was working for Radio Mogadishu – Voice of Somali Republic, a government owned Radio station, and killed him near his home in Wardhigley district.
“We condemn the assassination of Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey who is another victim of mindless and merciless brutality against journalists” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. “Somali journalists are being murdered for just reporting their stories independently or their journalistic work with particular media house”.
Journalists in Mogadishu believe that Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey was murdered because of his leading role and journalistic work with Radio Mogadishu which is owned and managed by Transitional Federal Government. The government officially accused Al-Shabaab armed group for committing this heinous crime. “The loss of this experienced journalist is heartbreaking for his family and colleagues, but it is also a blow to the entire Somali people” Omar declared.
NUSOJ says the latest assassination shows how journalists continue to face daily risks in Somalia where violence and terrorism has become an increasingly routine part of daily life. “We again call on all sides in the conflict to stop manipulating media to suit their own political interests which became major source of media victims” Omar Faruk added.
Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey joined the profession in 1988 as a reporter with former Somali National News Agency (SONNA), especially in the foreign news service. In the past ten years he worked for several media houses in Mogadishu such as HornAfrik radio, Somali Television Network (STN), East Africa Radio and recently radio Mogadishu.
Sheik Nur Mohamed Abkey didn’t move from his home when he started working for Radio Mogadishu as other journalists working for Radio Mogadishu moved to the premises of the Radio in fear for their security. The late Sheik Nur was well-skilled journalist who worked as producer, reporter, presenter and even technician.
***03.05.2010.Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) - International Press Freedom Day: 69 violations of media Freedoms in oPt since the beginning of the year
Let’s stand a minute of silence in respect to the souls of killed Journalists in Palestine and the whole world
Since Eighteen years ago, the world celebrates the Third of May as the International Press Freedom Day, which approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1993.The significance of the celebration is to highlight the violations practiced against Journalists and media institutions in all parts of the world, and promote freedom of expression culture. Especially; because the freedom of speech is missing in a lot of countries.
The occupied Palestinian territories are suffering from a lot Freedom of expression violations, where the media sector workers have been paying a high price for their hard insistence to cover events by word and image, which made them subjected almost to daily violations by Israeli occupation forces, and the Palestinian security forces in the West Bank and Gaza Strip on the other hand.
Palestinian Center for Development and media Freedoms (MADA) monitored 69 violations against Journalists in the first four months of this year; 57 violations were committed by the Israeli side, and 12 violations were committed by the Palestinian side.
This number is a serious and significant predictor at the low level of press freedom in the Palestinian territories. At the same period of the last year the number of violations was almost the same; 62 violations (41 were committed by the Israeli side, and 21 violations were committed by the Palestinian side). While on 2008 year witnessed 90 violations at the same period (64 were committed by Israeli side, and 26 by the Palestinian side). MADA monitored 173 violations during the last year.
Since the beginning of 2008, Five Journalists were killed by the Israeli occupation forces. Those are: Fadel Shana’a, Ihab Wahidi, Basil Faraj, A'la Murtaja, and Omar Silawi. As there have been no cases of murder were committed by the Palestinian side.
The continuing violations of media Freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories left negative effects on the Palestinian Journalists and the media landscape in Palestine, and the free access to information. The Palestine TV correspondent Haroon Amyreh, who had suffered from several violations by the Israeli occupation forces since the beginning of this year said: “The violations have a positive and negative impact on the Journalist, the positive effects that it increases the insistence of the Journalist to convey the truth to the whole world, and it gives him a greater motivation to continue covering the events, despite all the risks. While the negative effect is the feeling that there is no lasting security, where the beatings and insults by the Israeli occupation forces become as a routine for me.”
"The lack of security in the Journalistic work, make the journalist life like a hell and kill the motivation of work and creativity inside him”, said the freelance Journalist Mustafa Sabri, who expressed his feelings toward the multiple violations he had subjected by the security forces in West Bank. Where the several arrested times makes him living in state of fear and horror about his wife and his eight children.
Alhayat Aljadedeh correspondent in Gaza Strip “Nufouth Al-Bakri" has expressed her resentment from some officials who refused to give her information when they know that she is working with Alhayat Aljadedeh Newspaper ; Also, she complained about her permanent suffering from security agents in the dismissed government during her coverage of the press conference. It is worth mentioning that Al-Bakri home was raided two separated times by unknown individuals who said that they are belonging to the Interior Ministry and Ministry of Information.
In its efforts to develop its work to reduce the suppression of media freedoms in Palestine ,MADA will start in conjunction with the world press Freedom day, to defend Journalists by providing two lawyers in West Bank and Gaza Strip to defend them, and to give them legal consultancy. MADA will also work to increase the awareness of Journalists about their legal rights by holding workshops, printing a legal guide that related to the Journalist work in Palestine.
MADA will work to promote and to enhance freedom of expressions culture in the Palestinian society through the media .MADA will also launch an updated version of its website that contains new links about media freedoms violations.
MADA center calls the International community to exercise a real and effective pressure on Israel authorities to stop the continuing attacks on Journalists, and also demands the authorities in West Bank and Gaza to stop all forms of Suppression of media Freedoms. MADA also demands the release of all detained Journalists in Palestine and all over the world, and to provide a safe working environment for Journalists. And to respond to the UNESCO request to stand a minute of silence for the journalists who were killed, in order to show the truth, on Monday 3 May 2010, where 36 Journalists from all over the world had been killed since the beginning of 2010 according to Press Emblem Campaign press release.
MADA center offers warmest congratulations to fellow Journalists in Palestine and all over the world on the occasion of the International Press Freedom Day, hoping that Palestine and the entire world will witness a significant development to Freedom of opinion and expression.
Contact: Riham Abu Aita Public Relation Officer Ramallah info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com www.madacenter.org
***03.05.2010. WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY. IFJ Highlights Struggle in Iran on World Press Freedom Day
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has marked this year's World Press Freedom Day with a special focus on the situation of journalists in Iran where dozens of journalists remain behind bars, newspapers closed and where the IFJ affiliate, the Association of Iranian Journalists has had its office closed down.
"The onslaught on media in Iran has been unrelenting since the disputed elections in June, last year," said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. "The government has sought to suppress independent media and to shut down all contacts with outside following unprecedented show of public defiance to the regime."
The IFJ says there are still up to 35 journalists in prison since the mass trial of media last August and many more newspapers have been shut down. The office of the Association of Iranian Journalists (AoIJ), an IFJ affiliate, remains sealed since 5 August 2009 with no immediate prospect of being allowed to function again.
The IFJ Executive Committee decided in their meeting in Marrakech, Morocco on 20-21 March to focus World Press Freedom Day activities on raising awareness of the situation of media in Iran and support for the IFJ campaign to free Iranian journalists which has been running since September 2009. In particular, IFJ affiliates, their members and journalists around the world are requested to send the IFJ electronic post card to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, calling for the release of all detained journalists and the reopening of the AoIJ office in Tehran.
"We need to show solidarity with journalists in Iran all the time," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "But World Press Freedom Day provides the opportunity to focus the minds and send a message to the Iranian government about our determination to stand by our colleagues and fight for their freedom."
The IFJ has also called for global action to promote the safety of journalists following confirmed deaths of at least 27 journalists since the start of the year in countries such as Honduras, Thailand, Nigeria and Pakistan.
"This death toll after just four months ought to shock the world into action," added White. "We are well past the time of words alone in the face of utter indifference on the part of men of violence."
UN Secretary-General Ban KI-moon, in Remarks at World Press Freedom Day Event, Highlights Killings of 77 Journalists, Saying Governments Have Duty to Protect Media Personnel
Following are UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s remarks at the observance of World Press Freedom Day, in New York today, 29 April:
Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right, enshrined in article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But around the world, Governments and those who wield power use many different ways to obstruct it. They impose high taxes on newsprint, making newspapers so expensive that people cannot afford to buy them. Independent radio and TV stations are forced off the air if they criticize Government policies. The censors are active in cyberspace too, preventing people from accessing websites for political reasons, and arresting citizen journalists. In some parts of the world, journalists are imprisoned for years, on dubious or non-existent charges. Elsewhere, they risk intimidation and harassment, and even their lives, simply for doing their jobs. Simply for exercising their right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, through any media and regardless of frontiers. Last year, UNESCO condemned the killing of 77 journalists. These were not high-profile war correspondents, killed in the heat of battle. Most of them worked for small, local publications in peacetime. They were killed for attempting to expose wrongdoing or corruption.
I condemn these murders and insist that the perpetrators are brought to justice.
All Governments have a duty to protect those who work in the media. This protection must include investigating and prosecuting those who commit crimes against journalists. Impunity gives the green light to criminals and murderers, and empowers those who have something to hide. Over the long term, it has a corrosive and corrupting effect on society as a whole. Our theme this year is “Freedom of Information: the right to know”. The good news is that there is a global trend towards new laws which recognize the universal right to publicly held information. But these new laws do not always translate into action. Requests for official information are often refused, or delayed, for years. At times, poor information management is to blame. But all too often, this happens because of a culture of secrecy and a lack of accountability.
We must work to change attitudes and to raise awareness. People have a right to information that affects their lives. States have a duty to provide this information. Such transparency is essential to good government.
The United Nations stands with persecuted journalists and media professionals everywhere. Today, as every day, I call on Governments, civil society and people around the world to recognize the important work of media, and to stand up for freedom of information.
***29.04.2010. MEXICO. Mexico: International Mission Attacked in Oaxaca Human Rights Defenders, Activists and Journalists Killed or Missing
Yesterday at 14h30, a convoy of over 40 international and local human rights defenders, activists and journalists were attacked by an armed group in the town of San Juan Copala, Oaxaca State.
Two human rights defenders were killed, Finnish citizen Jyri Antero Jaakkola, and Mexican Beatriz Alberta Carino Trujillo, member of the Centro de Apoyo Comunitario Trabajando Unidos (CACTUS), both died by gunshot wounds.
According to locals, 40 other people in the international human rights mission ran away and two journalists remain missing. The total number of people killed, wounded and missing is yet to be confirmed by Mexican authorities.
The two journalists, Erika Ramirez and David Cilia García are reporters for the journal Contralinea. According to the journal, Erika and David established contact for the last time with their colleagues in Mexico City yesterday at eleven in the morning.
Erika and David were travelling to Oaxaca to investigate the previous killings of Felicitas Martínez Sánchez and Teresa Bautista Merino. Felicitas and Teresa work for the Triqui community radio station “The voice that breaks the silence” in San Juan Copala and were killed on 7 April 2008. No one has been brought to justice for their murders. According to local sources, one of the main concerns at the moment is that the Triqui region is more or less under siege, with no one allowed to leave, including those in need of hospital treatment.
The mission included human rights defenders coming from Finland, Italy, Belgium, and Germany, accompanied by representatives of local organisation the Red de Radios y Comunicadores Indígenas del Sureste Mexicano, Section 22 of the teachers union, the Asamblea Popular de los Pueblos de Oaxaca (APPO) and journalists, including Erika Ramirez and David Cilia García.
Yesterday’s attack adds to the atmosphere of insecurity and political confrontation that has been typical of the region since the beginning of 2007. This has been attributed in part to the declaration in January 2007 by the Triqui people of the creation of the autonomous municipality of San Juan Copala, 350 km away from the state capital. Furthermore, there is information that confirms the presence of paramilitary groups in the area.
ARTICLE 19 expresses its solidarity with the families and colleagues of the victims. We urge the local and federal authorities to undertake all necessary measures to find Erika Ramirez, David Cilia and others urgently and provide all necessary assistance, including medical and repatriation.
ARTICLE 19 is deeply concerned about the escalating number of attacks against journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico, and especially about the evident pattern of violence in Oaxaca. We also urge the authorities to launch a proper investigation into the attack and ensure that those responsible are brought to justice.
***28.04.2010. AFGHANISTAN.Les journalistes de FR3 Hervé Ghesquière et Stéphane Taponier otages des talibans depuis 4 mois. La Presse Emblème Campagne (PEC) s'inquiète de leur sort et demande à nouveau leur libération immédiate. La PEC s'associe à la pétition lancée par RSF:
"Nous, amis et soutiens des deux journalistes et de leurs accompagnateurs afghans comprenons et respectons les consignes de silence et de discrétion autour de leur enlèvement afin de ne pas gêner les négociations qui s’engageraient avec les ravisseurs. Pour autant, nous ne pouvons pas admettre que des responsables politiques mettent en cause la probité professionnelle de nos confrères et amis. Les journalistes de France Télévision enlevés sont tous deux très expérimentés, avec chacun plus de vingt ans d’expérience professionnelle sur de nombreux théâtres d’opération. Afghanistan, Proche Orient, conflit de l’ex-Yougoslavie, Rwanda, guérillas du Cambodge, ex-URSS, ils ont effectué de nombreux reportages dans des pays en guerre. C’est à ce titre que la rédaction de France 3 leur a confié cette mission d’information en Afghanistan. Journalistes et amis, nous n’accepterons pas que la réputation de nos confrères soit salie et diminuée alors même qu’ils sont encore aux mains de leurs ravisseurs et qu’ils n’ont pas encore livré le récit de leur enlèvement. Les propos tenus sont outrageants au regard du parcours professionnel de nos confrères, des risques qu’ils ont encourus avec certains d’entre nous pour informer le public lors d’autres conflits et des motivations profondes qui les guident dans l’accomplissement de leur métier. Le dénigrement de nos confrères est en outre très blessant pour les familles. Et puisque la recommandation est à la discrétion, nous aurions souhaité que les responsables politiques soient les premiers à faire preuve de retenue. Loin des contre-vérités et des polémiques. L’Etat doit assistance à tout citoyen français, fût-il journaliste"
signez la pétition sur le site de RSF: www.rsf.org
***22.04.2010. CONSTERNACIÓN EN AMÉRICA LATINA POR SEXTO PERIODISTA ASESINADO EN HONDURAS
La Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (FEPALC) expresa su consternación por el asesinato del periodista Jorge Georgino Orellana, sexto asesinado en los últimos dos meses en Honduras.
La FEPALC denuncia a viva voz la escalada de violencia contra los comunicadores sociales registrada en Honduras, que aumenta de manera delirante el número de víctimas del sector en la región.
Orellana fue asesinado la noche del último martes 20 de abril al salir de las instalaciones del canal de televisión en el que trabajaba, en San Pedro de Sula. El comunicador dirigía el programa "En vivo con Georgino", un programa de debates que se emitía de lunes a viernes en Televisión de Honduras.
Lo que más reclama la FEPALC es la celeridad con la que los agentes oficiales descartan –y no sólo en Honduras- el móvil del trabajo periodístico como causa del asesinato. Siempre arguyen altos índices de criminalidad o móviles pasionales, lo que nos parece inaceptable en recogida de evidencias y análisis de circunstancias que no han tomado siquiera 24 horas.
La FEPALC recuerda que otros cinco periodistas fueron asesinados en marzo en la peor escalada de ataques de este tipo en Honduras: José Bayardo Mairena Ramírez y Manuel de Jesús Juárez, comunicadores de Canal 4 y Radio Excélsior de Juticalpa, Olancho (26 de marzo); Nahúm Palacios Arteaga, periodista, asesinado en Tocoa el 14 de marzo; David Meza, reportero radiofónico, asesinado el 11 de marzo en La Ceiba; y Joseph Hernández Ochoa, presentador de televisión, asesinado a balazos el 1 de marzo en Tegucigalpa en un atentado en el que una colega suya, también periodista, resultó gravemente herida.
A lo acontecido en Honduras, la FEPALC suma su enérgico grito de no a la impunidad a los crímenes contra la periodista María Isabella Cordero, ex conductora de la cadena Televisa, en Chihuahua, en México y el reportero gráfico Arsenio Zambrano Ocampo, en Colombia, victimados en las últimas dos semanas.
Nuestra organización ante tan dramática situación demanda a los Estados hondureño, mexicano y colombiano tomar medidas certeras que garanticen la vida y seguridad de los periodistas.
Es terrible que a la fecha a consecuencia de la indiferencia y la ineficacia de los gobiernos sólo sumemos víctimas, una tras otra, sin que sea posible identificar a los culpables.
Honduras se ha convertido en el país con el mayor número de periodistas-víctimas en lo que va del 2010, seguido de México y Colombia.
Celso Schroder Presidente FEPALC
Zuliana Lainez Secretaria Derechos Humanos FEPALC
FEDERACIÓN DE PERIODISTAS DE AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE (FEPALC) Federación Argentina de Trabajadores de Prensa (FATPREN); Federación Nacional de Periodistas (FENAJ); Sindicato Nacional de Periodistas de Costa Rica (SNP); Federación Colombiana de Periodistas (FECOLPER); Federación Nacional de Trabajadores de los Medios de Comunicación Social de Chile (FENATRAMCO); Sindicato de Periodistas y Similares de El Salvador (SINPESS); Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Industria de la Prensa y Similares de Honduras (SITINPRES); Sindicato Nacional de Redactores de Prensa de México (SNRP); Sindicato de Periodistas del Paraguay (SPP); Asociación Nacional de Periodistas del Perú (ANP); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa de la República Dominicana (SNTP); Asociación de Prensa Uruguaya (APU); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa de Venezuela (SNTP).
***21.04.2010. Appeal for Press Freedom Day silence to honour world journalist dead (INSI)
London, 21 April - The International News Safety Institute supports a call for a minute's silence in newsrooms around the world to honour more than 1,500 journalists and other news media who have died trying to cover the story over the past 14 years.
UNESCO has called for the gesture of respect to take place this and every year on World Press Freedom Day, 3 May, "to denounce the murder of journalists and to demand an end to impunity" for their killers.
An INSI global inquiry into the deaths of news professionals, Killing The Messenger, recorded 1,000 deaths between 1996 and mid-2006. A further 500 have died since then, maintaining an average of more than two deaths every week. Twenty-four are confirmed killed this year so far, with an additional 14 cases under investigation to determine whether the killings were connected with the victims' work.
INSI and other news support organisations have found than in more than eight out of 10 cases no one is ever brought to justice. In some countries the prosecution rate is virtually zero.
"This is the dreadful hidden price of our world news," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "The death toll is a shocking indictment of States that fail in their duty to protect their journalist citizens -- and of other countries who profess a staunch commitment to freedom of expression but stand aloof when journalists die just trying to do their job.
"One minute's silence in newsrooms on World Press Freedom Day surely is the least we can do to remember our friends and colleagues who have fallen as well as those who still put their lives on the line daily to keep us informed."
The UNESCO proposal was adopted by the Intergovernmental Council of the Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) at its 27th session in Paris last month. The IPDC aims to mobilise the international community in support of media development in developing countries.
A Decision adopted on the safety of journalists stressed the responsibility of States to comply with their obligations under international law to end impunity and prosecute those responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law.
It called on member States to inform the Director-General of UNESCO of actions taken to prevent impunity as well as the progress of judicial inquiries into the murders of journalists.
The Decision also sought to place a priority on projects that support local capacity building for the safety of journalists. (INSI noted in this regard that it had provided free safety training for more than 1,595 news media staff in 21 countries.)
The Decision concluded by proposing UNESCO convenes an inter-agency meeting of all relevant UN agencies to formulate "a comprehensive, coherent and action-orientated approach to the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity."
***20.04.2010. PHILIPPINES. Statement of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility on the Agra order to drop the multiple murder charges against Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) Governor Zaldy Ampatuan Zaldy and Mamasapano Mayor Datu Akmad Ampatuan in connection with the Ampatuan Massacre
THE ORDER of acting Justice Secretary Alberto Agra for state prosecutors to drop the multiple murder charges against Zaldy and Akmad Ampatuan in connection with the Ampatuan Massacre of 2009 has understandably aroused suspicions of political interference.
Deputy presidential spokesman Gary Olivar has described these suspicions and outright allegations as “an obscenity.” But the real and current obscenity in this country is the fact that the alleged president for whom Olivar speaks has become central to the major issues that beset this country, most particularly that of whether there will be a change in its putrid leadership rather than more of the same despite the 2010 elections.
Why the country has reached this point is clear: Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has demonstrated time and again that no method is too mean and no tactic too low for her to use in her drive to remain in power, and that includes committing the worst travesties against the very institutions—whether the police, the military or the justice system—that sustain State power.
Gloria Macapagal Arroyo would rather that the public forget it, but there is no denying that the Ampatuans were, and could still be, her political allies, and that their help could be crucial in insuring the victory of the ruling coalition’s candidates at both the national and local levels.
The political imperative rather than the legal one is thus evident in Secretary Agra’s attempt to justify his order. His predecessor had ruled that there was “probable cause” that the two Ampatuans were involved in the conspiracy to waylay, abduct and kill the 57 men and women in the Mangudadatu convoy last November 23.
Whether either Ampatuan or both Ampatuans were actually present during the massacre is an incidental issue. If they were part of the conspiracy, their knowledge of and involvement in its planning constitutes the “probable cause” that Agra’s predecessor concluded existed as far as the two Ampatuans were concerned. It is that which must be established or proven false during the trial. Despite all this Agra still issued the order, thus the universal suspicion that Malacañang had told him to do so.
But there is not much point in belaboring the obvious. In the face of this most recent outrage against both justice and democracy, the media need to take this issue to the rest of Philippine society, and to bring to the attention of the Filipino people the impending travesty the Arroyo regime is once more poised to commit. The press too needs to support the public prosecutors protesting Agra’s order, and it needs to engage law groups as well as the rest of civil society not only in condemning the order, but even more importantly, in demanding that he recall it. For this the press and everyone else must take to the streets if necessary.
***16.04.2010. SOMALIA. IFJ Challenges Somali Extremists and International Community over Independent Media
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), the global voice of journalists, has expressed fresh concern over efforts on all sides in Somalia to wipe out independent media. The intervention follows a serious deterioration of the situation for private media outlets operating out of Somalia's densely populated and war-torn capital city of Mogadishu.
According to the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ), an IFJ affiliate, the Somali Islamist insurgent group, Hisbul Islam, has imposed bans on radio stations instructing them not to air music and songs and to refer to foreign fighters fighting the country not as "foreigners", but as "Muhaajiriin". Some 14 radio stations in Mogadishu buckled under this pressure and implemented the Hisbul Islam edict after a ten-day ultimatum.
"This latest action coming after months and years of violent intimidation illustrates the wretched state of press freedom in Somalia," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "Journalists are in the frontline of the struggle for peace and democracy in Somalia and they must be supported."
The IFJ says that the latest censorship is in line with similar actions been imposed on media stations in the southern Somalia regions held by Al-Shabaab Islamic extremists group. Many journalists fled or became Al-Shabaab hostages. This group took over Radio stations in Baidoa and Kismayu.
The IFJ says that media have also suffered as Somali extremist groups have put pressure on some trading companies not to place advertisements with particular media companies. Media and independent journalism have taken a hit too as donor support has diminished.
"The threats and bullying of journalists and the financial uncertainty surrounding private media have created a dangerous and despairing environment," said White. "More must be done to support media and to ensure the survival of independent journalism."
Radio Mogadishu, which is run and controlled by the Transitional Federation Government of Somalia (TFG), was launched to counter propaganda of Al-Shabaab. Newly established Radio Bar-Kulan, broadcasted in Nairobi but transmitted in strong FM station in Mogadishu, with the funding of the United Nations Support Office for AMISOM (UNSOA) is widely believed by the local media to support African Union Peace Keeping Troops in Mogadishu.
"The international community must not reduce its commitment to fund and to support media nor should it show hesitation in backing the private sector," said White. "These are the vital outlets that reflect the independent voice of the Somali people. If international support is withdrawn it will open the door to new pressure from extremists and the enemies of press freedom."
***13.04.2010. AFGHANISTAN. In Video, Journalist Says French President ‘Must Negotiate Very Quickly, Otherwise We Will Be Executed Soon’ (IPI)
In a video released by the Taliban in Afghanistan on Monday, two French journalists who were kidnapped in December say they will be killed unless the Taliban’s demands are met.
The two journalists, Stephane Taponnier and Herve Ghesquiere, both employed by France 3 television, were kidnapped in December in Afghanistan’s northeastern Kapisa province, along with their driver and Afghan translator.
One of the kidnappers’ demands was that the video be broadcast on France 3 television.
France 3 for the first time on Monday revealed the journalists’ names and images. The channel stated that it had so far protected the duo’s anonymity in the interest of their security, but that it had taken the decision to make the information public at the request of their family members.
The video shows one of the journalists reading from a notebook, in English: “This message is the last message for the French government and my TV: France 3. After three months to be prisoner, the Taliban want absolutely that their (will) has to be accepted by French officials.”
He adds: "The French president, Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy, must understand that we are now in danger of death. I repeat, the French president must negotiate very quickly, otherwise we will be executed soon."
The French Foreign Ministry has announced that it is working to secure the journalists’ release. “Given that this could have a direct impact on the security of our two compatriots and the course of our action to secure their release, we prefer to exert the utmost discretion on this point,” spokesman Bernard Valero was quoted by AFP as saying.
The video was reportedly released on a Taliban website, alemarah.info, and was accompanied by a statement which announced that the Taliban had sent the French government a list of detainees who were to be released in exchange for the journalists’ safety.
The area of Afghanistan where the journalists were kidnapped is primarily French-patrolled.
In recent times, journalists have repeatedly been kidnapped or taken hostage by nations or non-state actors in hopes of ransom or political mileage. Earlier this month, two journalists of British origin were reportedly kidnapped when they were returning from an interview with Taliban representatives in Pakistan’s restive North West Frontier Province. Last year Iran arrested and tried an American journalist, Roxana Saberi, sentencing her to eight years on espionage charges. She was later released after her sentence was suspended. Also in 2009, North Korea detained two American journalists after it claimed that they had illegally crossed the border from China to North Korea. They were released after a visit to North Korea by former U.S President Bill Clinton.
“It is unacceptable that journalists be used as pawns or as tools for political maneuvering,” said IPI Press Freedom Manager Anthony Mills. “Journalists are neutral observers and must be treated as such. They should be allowed to do their job freely and without fear of being kidnapped for political ends. The Taliban must release these journalists unharmed immediately.”
***08.04.2010. IRAQ: US MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWERS SHARE VIDEO OF REUTERS STAFF BEING KILLED
Chilling video footage of the US military killing a dozen Iraqis, including two Reuters staff, was released on 5 April by WikiLeaks, a website that publishes leaked information. The disturbing video was taken from a US Apache helicopter, and includes heartless commentary from soldiers as they fire on civilians in a Baghdad neighbourhood.
Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and his assistant Saeed Chmagh, 40, are seen in the video walking with cameras slung over their shoulders when the voice of a US soldier identifies the cameras as "weapons." Prior to the attack, Chmagh is talking on the phone. Minutes later, a van appears; as two men start carrying a wounded Chmagh to the van, the helicopter fires on the van. Two children were hurt in the subsequent firing.
The US military claims fighting took place between US forces and insurgents. The video shows otherwise. WikiLeaks also spoke to witnesses and journalists directly involved in the episode. "The Guardian" reports the Pentagon has identified WikiLeaks as a threat to national security. Meanwhile, Reuters has been unsuccessful in its attempts to obtain a copy of the video through the Freedom of Information Act.
REMEMBER: seven years ago the attack by US forces on Palestine Hotel in Baghdad
The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) joins journalists and media workers from media organisations across the world and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) in commemorating the seven-year anniversary of two attacks by the United States in Iraq which resulted in the deaths of several journalists.
On April 8, 2003, an attack by US forces on Baghdad’s Palestine Hotel killed José Couso, of Spain’s Telecinco and Taras Protsyuk, a Ukrainian cameraman working for Reuters. The hotel has long been known for hosting foreign journalists.
On the same day, US forces attacked the offices of the Al Jazeera broadcaster in Baghdad, killing reporter Tareq Ayyoub.
The IFJ and other press freedom groups examined the Pentagon’s November 2004 report on the attack on the Palestine Hotel, concluding it was flawed and unconvincing.
The IFJ calls on US President Barack Obama to now set up a thorough inquiry, in the spirit of his stated vision of hope for peace and stability in Iraq.
This year’s April 8 anniversary coincides with publication by Wikileaks on April 5 of a video which reportedly portrays a US military helicopter in July 2007 opening fire on and killing civilians in Baghdad, among them Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Sameed Chmagh.
Reuters has repeatedly requested this US military footage under US freedom of information laws, to no avail. The footage can be seen at the following link: www.collateralmurder.com
Today, the IFJ and its affiliates are writing to President Obama requesting that his administration take responsibility to explain the 2003 and 2007 attacks, especially to the families and colleagues of the victims.
In 2006, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1738, which calls on governments to protect journalists and media personnel working in situations of war and conflict, in accordance with their civilian status.
At the most recent meeting of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva last month, the IFJ alongside Article 19 and the International News Safety Institute (INSI) welcomed a draft resolution on protection of journalists in situations of armed conflict.
The draft resolution recognises the “vital role played by the press in situations of armed conflict” and highlights “the large and increasing number of deaths and injuries among members of the press in armed conflict”.
***01.04.2010. FIVE JOURNALISTS KILLED IN HONDURAS IN MARCH, UNESCO REPORTS
New York, Apr 1 2010 10:10AM The head of the United Nations agency tasked with defending press freedom today spoke out against the murders of two radio journalists ambushed last week, bringing the total number of media professionals killed in the Central American nation last month alone to five.
As José Bayardo Mairena and Manuel Juárez, who worked for the radio stations Excélsior and Super 10, drove from hosting a radio programme in Catacamas, in eastern Honduras, their car was sprayed with bullets by unidentified armed men, according to reports.
“Such despicable crimes against media professionals undermine the fundamental right of freedom of information, cornerstone of a democratic society,” said Irina Bokova, Director-General of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/).
Also killed last month were journalist Nahúm Palacios Arteaga in Tocoa on 14 March; radio reporter David Meza on 11 March in La Ceiba; and, on 1 March, reporter Joseph Hernández Ochoa in Tegucigalpa, in a shooting that seriously wounded another journalist.
“I call on the Honduran authorities to make every possible effort to arrest the perpetrators and put an end to this unprecedented and intolerable wave of violence,” Ms. Bokova said.
Reporters Without Borders, a non-governmental organization (NGO), has said that Honduras and Mexico are now the deadliest countries by far for journalists working in the Western Hemisphere.
A new report issued by UNESCO last week found that rising numbers of journalists are being killed worldwide, mostly in countries that are at peace, calling for an end to impunity in the murders of media professionals. Last year set a new record, with 77 murders reported by the agency. The high number is due in part to the murder of some 30 journalists in one day during an ambush in the Philippines on 23 November 2009, the publication says. Sadly, the frequency of acts of violence against journalists is increasing,” it notes. “In most cases, impunity precludes the way of justice, and if this trend prevails, journalists will remain easy targets.
“Needless to say this represents a severe threat to freedom of expression and to our ability to seek the truth.”
***26.03.10. UN Human Rights Council: ARTICLE 19, IFJ and INSI Back New UN Action over Safety of Journalists in Armed Conflict (see PEC NEWS)
ARTICLE 19, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the International News Safety Institute (INSI) have welcomed a draft resolution on protection of journalists in situations of armed conflict which has been proposed at the thirteenth session of the UN Human Rights Council by Bangladesh, Egypt and Mexico.
The draft resolution coincides with action at UNESCO where a request was made for an inter-agency discussion to promote a UN-wide action plan on the safety of journalists.
The draft resolution recognises the “vital role played by the press in situations of armed conflict” and highlights “the large and increasing number of deaths and injuries among members of the press in armed conflict”. It calls on the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to organise a panel discussion on the issue with “all concerned parties and stakeholders, including relevant press organizations and associations”.
ARTICLE 19, IFJ and INSI welcome the spirit of the resolution, particularly the support from Mexico which has one of highest rate of journalists’ killings over the last three years. They are nevertheless concerned that the process suggested by the resolution (a panel discussion) is inappropriate in view of the gravity of the situation. The resolution also fails to make reference to, and build on, steps taken to date by the international community, and to enforce commitments by member states which are still to be implemented.
In 2006, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1738 calling on governments to protect journalists in armed conflict situations. The resolution, recalling the frequency of acts of violence, including deliberate attacks in many parts of the world against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel in armed conflicts called on all parties to put an end to such practices.
The Security Council demanded that all parties to an armed conflict must comply with their obligations under international law to protect civilians in armed conflict. It also emphasized the responsibility of States in that regard, as well as their obligation to end impunity and to prosecute those responsible for serious violations. All parties in situations of armed conflict were urged to respect the professional independence and rights of journalists, media professionals and associated personnel as civilians.
Some four years later, the recommendations still have to be fully implemented. Over the past 12 years, more than 1,100 journalists and media staff have been killed in the line of duty. Almost none of these crimes have been prosecuted and impunity for crimes committed against journalists is especially high.
ARTICLE 19, IFJ and INSI call on the three sponsors and all member states to: • Comply with their obligations under international law to protect civilians in armed conflicts and end impunity, as highlighted by UN Security Council Resolution 1738 (2006) on violence against journalists, media professionals, and associated personnel in armed conflicts; and other international agreements and initiatives; • Ensure that a future panel discussion on the topic focuses on the implementation of existing international agreements and commitments, with the view of identifying the gaps and problems with violence and impunity, and effective ways of addressing them.
ARTICLE 19, IFJ and INSI encourage broad participation in this process and accordingly offer their assistance to all interested parties.
***18.03.10. MEXICO: EIGHT JOURNALISTS ABDUCTED, TWO KILLED
In Mexico, information can be fatal. Eight journalists were abducted in separate episodes between 18 February and 3 March, report the Center for Journalism and Public Ethics (CEPET), Inter American Press Association (IAPA), Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). Three journalists were later released; one of them died as a result of being tortured. Mexican journalists in newsrooms remain silent about the kidnappings for fear of reprisals from drug traffickers. And in another part of the country also caught in the terror of drug cartels, another journalist was slain on 12 March.
The abducted journalists work for both print and broadcast media and were kidnapped in Reynosa, northern Tamaulipas State. Sources declined to name the victims or file complaints with authorities due to fear of retaliation or further endangering the victims' lives. The abductions come at a time of bloody clashes between two drug cartels in the Reynosa border area, and the press has been intimidated into not reporting on the violence. Local journalists say the cartels are behind the kidnappings and corrupt police are protecting them. "An escalating internal dispute among drug cartel members has claimed over 200 lives in 14 days and contributed to a media blackout," reports the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA).
Reporter Jorge Rábago Valdez, 49, who worked for the Reynosa-based daily "La Prensa" and broadcasters Radio Rey and Reporteros en la Red, was abducted on 19 February. He was dumped on a highway less than two weeks later, and was found alive, but unconscious with signs of torture. He died in a hospital on 2 March. Miguel Angel Domínguez Zamora, a reporter for the Reynosa-based "El Mañana", has been missing since 1 March.
Two reporters from the Milenio media group were assigned to cover drug-related violence in Reynosa. They were abducted on 3 March and freed the next day. A top editor at Milenio, Ciro Gómez Leyva, wrote an op-ed saying they had been injured and their abductors had warned them to avoid any reporting on them. "Journalism in Reynosa is dead. I have nothing more to say," he said.
"As drug trafficking, violence, and lawlessness take hold," said CPJ, "the Mexican media are forced into silence. This pervasive self-censorship is causing severe damage to Mexican democracy."
In a separate incident, Mexican reporter Evaristo Pacheco Solís was found shot to death last week in Chilpancingo, Guerrero State - another area convulsed with open warfare between drug gangs, report RSF, CPJ and the International Press Institute (IPI). A reporter with the weekly "Visión Informativa", Pacheco Solís is the second journalist killed in Guerrero this year. According to press reports, at least 15 people died in a series of violent attacks in Guerrero last week.
"As journalist after journalist is slain there, the Mexican population - who stand at the forefront of the government's violent conflict with drug cartels - are being deprived of their right to information, and courageous Mexican journalists are being brutally deprived of their right to inform," said IPI.
***16.03.10. IFJ Condemns Spate of Journalists' Murders in Honduras
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today expressed fresh concern over the media crisis in Honduras following three murders in two weeks targeting media. The killings of Joseph Hernández Ochoa, a former TV presenter on 1 March, David Meza Montesinos, a radio reporter who died on 11 March and fellow reporter Nahum Palacios Arteaga murdered three days later were carried out in drive- by shootings. "This spate of murders targeting journalists in Honduras shows the alarming level of increasing political violence in the country," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "There is a disturbing trend of targeting of journalists in a cold-blooded series of planned assassinations." According to media reports, all three journalists were killed while driving their cars. Arteaga, 34, a radio reporter, was shot dead on Sunday 14 March in the coastal city of Tocoa. Gunmen blocked his car before firing a hail of bullets - 41 in all - into the car, killing him instantly. Montesinos, a veteran reporter for El Patio radio station, was killed as he was driving home in the town of La Ceiba when armed men opened fire from another car. He had reportedly received death threats earlier over his coverage of the drug trade. Ochoa, a former television presenter, also died in a drive-by shooting which also injured a passenger in his car, fellow journalist Carol Cabrera. Their car was sprayed with bullets by gunmen travelling in another vehicle, reports say. The IFJ says journalists are victims of organised crime as the country struggles to restore political dialogue and law and order in the wake of last year's coup d'état which sparked political unrest in the country. The Federation accused at the time the coup leaders of attacking journalists and closing media in Honduras. "Journalists are extremely vulnerable in Honduras as impunity is taking hold in the country," added White. "Every effort must be made to protect journalists and restore the rule of law and order to the streets."
***07.03.10. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) Annual report of violations of media freedoms in the Occupied Palestinian Territories: 173 violations of media freedoms in oPt during the year 2009 - 2009 was a bloody year for Palestinian journalists
Israel's continued occupation of the Palestinian lands has lead to continued violations of media freedoms during the past year (2009). The ongoing conflict between Fatah and Hamas was the main factor in the violations that took place by the Palestinian side, whereas the Palestinian territories are still characterized by the security control of several parties which leads to a multiplicity of actors that violate media freedoms. There are Israeli occupation authorities and settlers On the one hand and security apparatuses in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip on the other, in addition to Palestinian armed groups which led to the continued decline of media freedom and freedom of expression available. The excessive practice of self censorship by journalists and media outlets have also led to a decline in the level and professionalism of Palestinian media.
In this context, the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) has monitored 173 violations of media freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories during the past year 2009, 97 of which were committed by the Israeli occupation forces and settlers, and 76 were committed by the Palestinian security apparatuses in the West Bank and Gaza, and the Palestinian armed groups.
Although the size of the violations against the Palestinian Journalists is large and it is considered one of the largest rates at the global level, but it marks a decline in the number of violations compared to year 2008, which witnessed 257 violations monitored by MADA Center. It was noted that despite this decline the past year was a bloody year for the Palestinian journalists who have lost four of their colleagues by the fire of the Israeli occupation forces during the aggression on the Gaza Strip. Those are: Omar Silawi, A'la Murtaja, Basel Faraj and Ihab Al-Wehaidi.
It was noted that violations against Palestinian journalists have been increasing when the inter-Palestinian disputes were escalating. The attacks by the Israeli side have also seriously increased during the aggression against the Gaza Strip during the month of January as well as during the coverage of peace marches against the Apartheid Wall in the West Bank. The Israeli security forces have escalated their attacks against journalists in the city of Jerusalem and banned their entry to the yards of Al-Aqsa Mosque in a clear violation not only to international conventions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but also to the Israeli law itself which occupation forces forcibly apply in the occupied East Jerusalem.
In the same context, Israel continued its policy of detaining journalists. The number of detainees among them has attained seven journalists. The same was repeated by the Palestinian side where thirty journalists have been detained. The same number was kept in custody by the Israeli and the Palestinian sides for different periods. However, the number of Palestinian journalists who were injured by Israeli occupation forces has attained 34, while the number of injuries due to beating attacks by the Palestinian side has attained six journalists.
In another corner of this scene, last year haunted bombing and destruction of a large number of media institutions and homes of journalists in the Gaza Strip during the Israeli aggression. The Israeli occupation forces have, moreover, prevented the entry of Palestinian newspapers over the past year, in addition to continuing its policy of restricting the movement of journalists from and to the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, the occupation forces continued its old policy of preventing most of the journalists in the West Bank from freedom of movement to and from Israel and Jerusalem, as well as the denial of travel abroad to some journalists. The Israeli systematic and continued measures against the entire components of the media sector in Palestine prevented many of our colleagues from traveling abroad to receive international and regional awards that were awarded to them due to their objectivity and professionalism in the coverage of the Palestinian reality with all its pains and hopes.
The persistence of the political divide with all attendant sharpness and rift in the relationship between Hamas and Fatah led to further infringement on press freedoms by the Palestinian security apparatuses in both parts of the country. It also led to keeping many media institutions in the West Bank and Gaza Strip banned from functioning or halted as a result of their staff’s fear of prosecution and attacks, since Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in mid-June 2007.
The continued conflict between the two movements has also led to the promotion of self-oversight among the Palestinians journalist which negatively impacted on the productivity and professionalism of the Palestinian media. Tow concepts became dominating the mentality of a big number of journalists: fear or courtesy, the fear of Hamas or courtesy to it as well as the fear of Fatah or courtesy to it.
In regard to kidnapping of journalists, the Palestinian arena and for the second consecutive year did not see any cases of abduction of journalists, which predicts the demise of this phenomenon that prevailed in the Palestinian territories for several years, and produced very negative impacts on the work of the media outlets, especially the international ones. It is noted in this regard that such a phenomenon had also a negative and dangerous impact on the status of the Palestinian cause. When a foreign journalist is kidnapped, the international public opinion, especially the one of the country of the kidnapped, will retreat in its sympathy to the Palestinians and their just demands.
While “MADA” is welcoming the decision of Dr. Salam Fayyad which prohibits torture in the prisons of the Palestinian National Authority, and the decision of the Director General of Police in the Gaza Strip not to abuse journalists, but to facilitate their mission, which will have positive impact on press freedom, we request that the decisions should be accompanied with a resolution by relevant authorities in the West Bank and Gaza strip prohibits the arrest of journalists on the background of freedom of opinion and expression.
“MADA” Center condemns all attacks against journalists and media outlets which is a flagrant violation of freedom of expression guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Palestinian Basic Law and the Law on Press and Publication.
MADA Center also expresses its appreciation to the colleague journalists who, despite the seriousness of the situation in the Palestinian territories and the magnitude of the repeated attacks on them, continued to do their full duty, risking their lives in many cases. The cheerful difference here is that many of them have received regional and international awards which indicate their high level of professionalism.
We confirm again that without the demise of the Israeli occupation and putting an end to the internal Palestinian conflict, it is difficult to talk about a dramatic drop in attacks on journalists and Palestinian media outlets.
Recommendations:
Based on the details of the Palestinian media sector over the past year and due to the goals of the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) in terms of defending media freedoms and developing the Palestinian media, it recommends the following:
· Respecting the freedom of expression guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Palestinian Basic Law and the Law on Press and Publication.
· Urging the international community to pressure Israel to stop its attacks on journalists and Palestinian media outlets.
· Releasing the journalists detained in Israeli and Palestinian prisons.
· Prohibiting the arrest of journalists by the Palestinian security apparatuses in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and not involving them in the internal Palestinian disputes.
· Allowing all media outlets and journalists in the West Bank and Gaza to work freely and safely.
· Commitment of the Palestinian journalists to professional standards, and not to resort to incitement.
· Forming a supreme council for media to be responsible for the official media bodies to ensure their impartiality and objectivity.
· Respecting the decisions of the judiciary, especially the rulings of the Supreme Court of Justice, related to journalists by the authorities responsible for law enforcement.
· Prosecuting all those responsible for attacks on journalists and bringing them to justice.
· Enacting a law on the right free access to information, and amending the Law on Press and Publications of 1995, in accordance with the Palestinian Basic Law and the international standards on freedom of expression.
***03.03.10. KILLING OF NEPALESE MEDIA GROUP HEAD SPARKS UN ALARM
The United Nations human rights office in Nepal today expressed its deep concern over the killing of the head of a media group, the latest in a string of murders of journalists in the Asian nation.
Arun Singhanyia, chairperson of the Janakpur Today Media Group in southern Nepal, was shot dead on 1 March. According to media reports, he was killed as he was traveling home after celebrating the Hindu festival of Holi.
His murder comes just one month after the killing of Jamim Shah, head of satellite TV station Channel Nepal and cable TV company Space Time Network, who was shot dead by two men on a motorcycle on a major thoroughfare in Katmandu, the capital. His driver Mathuraman Malakar was seriously injured in the attack.
Last year, Uma Singh, a reporter at Radio Today FM and a member of the Women’s Human Rights Defenders in the southern district of Dhanusha, was hacked to death in her own home by men armed with “khukhuris,” curved knives traditional to Nepal.
The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal stressed today that threats and violence against the media can jeopardize the right to freedom of expression, and that journalists must be able to carry out their profession safely and have their human rights fully respected.
The State must ensure the necessary security and intervene when appropriate for all journalists under threat, it added.
“The protection of journalists is of paramount importance in a democratic society and both State and non-State actors must show full respect for press freedom and support a free and independent media,” said Andrew Palmer, Officer-in-Charge of OHCHR-Nepal.
A decade-long civil war, claiming some 13,000 lives, ended in 2006 with the signing of a peace accord between the Government and Maoists. After conducting Constituent Assembly elections in May 2008, Nepal abolished its 240-year-old monarchy and declared itself a republic.
UNESCO CHIEF DEPLORES KILLING OF NEPALESE MEDIA OWNER New York, Mar 4 2010 11:10AM The head of the United Nations agency tasked with defending press freedom today condemned the murder of Nepalese media owner Arun Singhaniya, while reiterating her concerns over the ongoing threats faced by journalists in the South Asian nation.
Mr. Singhaniya was killed on 1 March in the south-eastern city of Janakpur, the second such murder three weeks. According to local media sources, he was shot by four men on motorbikes, and several armed groups have claimed responsibility for the murder.
He was chairman of Janakpur Today Publications, which publishes Janakpur Today and operates Radio Today. A journalist from the radio station, Uma Singh, was murdered 12 months ago.
“I condemn the murder of Arun Singhaniya, who was fulfilling an important role in the development of a dynamic information service,” UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova stated in a news release.
She stressed that in Nepal, as elsewhere in the world, a pluralistic media serves as a vital pillar for freedom of expression, and voiced her conviction that the Nepalese authorities should do everything possible to ensure that this crime does not go unpunished.
***03.03.10. PHILIPPINES: Statement of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility and theSoutheast Asian Press Alliance on the 100th day of the Ampatuan Massacre
A hundred days have passed since the massacre of 32 journalists and media workers in Maguindanao, Southern Philippines, together with 26 others. The principal suspect has been indicted. But the petition for bail of the alleged mastermind has been the subject of several postponements, in a portent of things to come that’s not encouraging for the demand for justice for the victims.
The urgent demand for justice is in danger of foundering on the shoals of the technicalities that—together with police collusion at the local levels in the killing of journalists, overworked prosecutors who fear for their safety, and the involvement of local officials and warlords—constitute the many weaknesses of the Philippine justice system. Equally distressing is the information, relayed by one of the private lawyers helping prosecute the case, that witnesses are being bought if not threatened, and that relatives are being offered amounts that few mortals in the Philippine community setting can refuse in exchange for withdrawing their complaints.
Add public indifference and resignation, and the mass media’s own short attention span and susceptibility to the lure of reporting those events that help boost ratings and circulations to these problems and issues, and we have the potential for the massacre’s not only going unpunished, but even forgotten.
Forgetfulness is among the worst vices of a people whom the media have failed to provide information crucial to their lives. And yet, forgetfulness is the sure guarantee for the repetition of such atrocities as the Ampatuan massacre, the human rights violations that continue to haunt this country, and the constant peril of authoritarian rule. Only by remembering the past can we prevent its repetition.
The media are among the institutions crucial to the fostering of the imperative of keeping in the public mind the need for justice in the Ampatuan massacre and for the making of a culture of remembrance. But the public as a whole needs to support the campaign to keep the Ampatuan massacre in the national agenda as an issue that needs resolution. As we enter the fourth month since that atrocity, the undersigned media and journalists’ organizations renew their pledge never to forget and to continue to remind the Philippine public and the international community that the pro-active engagement of a militant people and a truly free and responsible press can prevent the many crimes and atrocities that haunt this country, among them the killing of journalists, from going unpunished and even repeated.
***03.03.10. MEXICO: PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHIND CRIMES AGAINST JOURNALISTS
Mexico is the deadliest country in the Americas for journalists trying to do their job. Organised crime is often perceived as being predominantly behind attacks on the press, but a new report by ARTICLE 19 and the National Center for Social Communication (CENCOS) points to public officials as the main perpetrators. And there is a movement to challenge this culture of impunity with newspaper editors and journalists joining forces to urge the government to take action, reports the Inter American Press Association (IAPA).
ARTICLE 19 and CENCOS recorded 244 cases of attacks and intimidation against journalists and media workers in 2009. Within that number of attacks, 11 journalists were assassinated and one more has disappeared. More than 65 percent of assaults on press freedom came from political authorities or individuals linked to political parties, compared to six percent from criminal gangs, with the Mexican army cited in 26 abuses.
The report examines the lack of political will to deal with the issue, along with severe corruption. Governments at all levels and security services are failing to protect media workers, which leads to a culture of impunity, allowing attacks on the press being carried out to eliminate unwanted reporting or dissident voices.
In a separate statement, ARTICLE 19 called on Gustavo Salas Chávez, the newly appointed Special Prosecutor for Crimes Against the Media, to be independent, impartial and to protect the rights of victims and avoid re-victimisation. The previous prosecutor was widely seen as ineffective at controlling attacks on the press and claimed that the murders of journalists were not work-related. As well, the Office of the Special Prosecutor for Crimes Against the Media (FEADP), established in 2006, has lacked the political will to investigate crimes and bring perpetrators to justice.
In addition, the Center for Journalism and Public Ethics (CEPET) recorded 183 attacks on journalists and 19 attacks on media in 2009, a 10 percent increase from the year before. According to CEPET's annual report, the attacks include threats, arbitrary detention or intimidation, injuries and disappearances. CEPET records the murders of 13 journalists, although not all were linked to their work. CEPET's research concurs that most attacks are connected to the state, and most take place with impunity.
A forum held last month by IAPA, in Durango, Mexico, brought together newspaper editors and publishers from the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila, Sinaloa and Sonora, to discuss the self-censorship that is routine as a result of violent reprisals from organised crime. It called on federal and state authorities to make crimes against journalists a federal offense and for the creation of a united front among police, public prosecutors' offices and the army, to give journalists timely and transparent access to information about acts of violence.
***18.02.10. CPJ LAUNCHES SURVEY OF ATTACKS ON THE PRESS AT EVENTS WORLDWIDE
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) released its worldwide survey on press freedom violations, "Attacks on the Press," in six countries in different regions on 16 February. Drawing on CPJ's own investigations as well as information gathered by other IFEX members, the 360-page book details the struggles and threats journalists face and how these press freedom violations corrupt the flow of information, undermining democracy. The survey provides a factual, systematic analysis of the media environment in more than 100 countries, with information on journalists killed, imprisoned, and the repercussions of forcing journalists into in exile.
In Africa, dozens of journalists have gone into exile because of intimidation and violence, especially in Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea. And with this exodus of reporters, local communities no longer have a reliable source of information, governments or political factions take over control of formerly independent news outlets, and there are fewer journalists who have the professional standards and training to carry out independent news gathering. Many journalists remaining in Ethiopia and Eritrea have been imprisoned. In Somalia, English-speaking journalists are targeted. This means that without reliable local reporters, international reporters no longer get news. In exile in Nairobi, separated from loved ones, living on the streets, Somali journalists encounter arbitrary harassment and detention. At the Nairobi launch of the CPJ survey, Somali journalists pointed to the risks local journalists face in the war-ravaged country; nine journalists were killed in 2009.
In the Americas, unlawful spying by national intelligence agencies has created a chill with sources becoming increasingly reluctant to talk to journalists. Cuban state security agents have kept journalists and dissidents under constant surveillance for decades. In Colombia in 2009, agents subjected journalists, politicians, judges and human rights defenders to illegal phone tapping and e-mail interception. And in Argentina, there has been a federal investigation examining whether agents tapped the phones and hacked the e-mail accounts of critical journalists, politicians, judges, and artists as part of a strategy to discredit and stop their work.
On 16 February in Bogotá, CPJ and the local Foundation for Freedom of the Press (FLIP) launched their annual reports together. They also met with authorities, including President Alvaro Uribe Vélez, to discuss the findings of the reports. The delegates called on the Colombian government to prosecute all those responsible for illegal spying and to refrain from accusing members of the media of having connections to armed groups, without any evidence, as it puts their lives in danger.
The CPJ survey points to the power of the Internet in the Middle East in bringing human rights reporting to a mass audience by bloggers, despite brutal attacks on critics by the state, and the resilience of Arab journalists. "A 2008 survey of 600 journalists in 13 Arab countries by the American University in Cairo found that most believed their primary mission was to drive reform."
At a press conference in Cairo, Naziha Rejiba, editor of the Tunisian online publication "Kalima" and a 2009 CPJ International Press Freedom Awardee, offered a stark description of the harassment Tunisian journalists face. "They don't kill us physically... but they assassinate our characters." At the United Nations in New York, Canadian-Iranian journalist Maziar Bahari, who was detained and tortured for 118 days in Tehran's Evin prison, asked the secretary-general to prioritize free expression.
For Asia, the book includes a special section on the culture of impunity in the Philippines with a detailed account of the massacre of 32 journalists last November in election-related violence. For the international launch of the book, in Tokyo, CPJ led a panel discussion on how technology and the rise of social media is changing the press freedom landscape, with discussion on citizen journalists sending photos of street demonstrations in Iran, and other examples that highlight the worst abusers.
***17.02.10 IRAN: IFEX MEMBERS SPEARHEAD CAMPAIGN TO RELEASE IMPRISONED IRANIAN JOURNALISTS
A coalition of IFEX members launched a campaign last week on the 31st anniversary of the Iranian revolution, to pressure the government of Iran to release journalists and activists imprisoned for exercising their right to free expression. The "Our Society Will Be a Free Society" campaign is named for a pledge that Ayatollah Khomenei made during the 1979 Iranian Revolution to protect freedom of expression and the press.
But in the last 31 years, thousands of newspapers have been shut down, hundreds of journalists arrested and hundreds more sentenced to long prison terms, and dozens executed. In the days leading up to the anniversary, in an effort to stop opposition protests and control the flow of information in and out of the country, authorities suspended Google Mail (saying they would soon create a national email service), blocked text messaging, slowed connectivity to the Internet and arrested several journalists, report the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF). Meanwhile, foreign journalists were invited to Iran to cover pro-government celebrations, says RSF.
The coalition is a joint initiative of CPJ, RSF, International PEN, PEN American Center, English PEN, Index on Censorship, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE) and the International Publishers Association (IPA). It is acting out of "a sense of shared, urgent concern for the welfare of journalists, writers and bloggers and a profound alarm over the situation for free expression in Iran." The campaign runs up to 20 March, the Iranian New Year, with events aimed at increasing pressure for the release of writers and journalists in prison. It then continues in North America and Europe through the spring. The group is also urging world leaders to apply pressure on Iran to release jailed dissidents. Some of the most distinguished journalists and leading bloggers are behind bars.
In an open letter to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the coalition asks him to respect the spirit of the 1979 revolution to "protect human rights and celebrate the Iranian people's freedom of expression" by releasing the more than 60 writers, journalists and bloggers in prison. "This list constitutes the largest number of our colleagues jailed by any country on earth at one time in over a decade," says the letter.
In an op-ed published on 10 February in the "International Herald Tribune" and addressed to Ayatollah Khamenei, Iranian-Canadian journalist and documentary filmmaker Maziar Bahari, who is working with the coalition, said: "The only accusation against many reporters who are languishing in Iranian jails at the moment is that they held a mirror to the actions of the Iranian government. They did not want to overthrow it. They never took up arms. All of them did their job as peacefully as journalists elsewhere around the world." Bahari was arrested while reporting on demonstrations in Tehran in the aftermath of the disputed June 2009 election. He also says, "I was unfortunate enough to know firsthand how your agents treat journalists. I was kept in your jail for 118 days simply for being a reporter. For much of that time I was tortured."
The Human Rights Council of the United Nations met on 15 February to examine Iran's human rights record. The Council has "more than 200 reports documenting the arbitrary arrests, incommunicado detentions and torture, often for the purposes of extracting false confessions, of intellectuals, students, artists, human rights defenders, journalists and others after the disputed presidential elections last year," says the Writers in Prison Committee of International PEN (WiPC).
"The countries that say nothing about the bloody crackdown that has been taking place in Iran for the past eight months are accomplices to these crimes," RSF said. "When the UN Human Rights Council conducts its Universal Periodic Review of Iran, it must show that it is up to the task."
On 17 February, the coalition called for UN special rapporteurs to be sent to Iran. UN human rights experts have already brought attention to the mass arrests and abuse of dissidents, said Index on Censorship, "but independent investigation on the ground is crucial."
Iranian human rights organisations and activists and international labour groups protested outside UN offices in Geneva this week, demanding the immediate and unconditional release of political prisoners, reports the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ). Two weeks ago, IFJ participated in a meeting at the European Parliament on "Human, Journalists and Trade-Union Rights in Iran: the New State of Emergency." The group is calling for the reopening of the Iranian Association of Journalists (AoIJ).
Sign a petition to free Kian Tajbakhsh, an Iranian-American scholar sentenced in August 2009 to 15 years in prison after a mass trial of 140 activists, intellectuals and writers. Please visit: Free Kian ( www.freekian09.org/tag/our-society-will-be-a-free-society/ )
***16.02.10. COLOMBIA. Informe sobre el estado de la libertad de prensa en Colombia en 2009
En el 2009 el estado de la libertad de prensa en Colombia no varió significativamente en comparación con años anteriores. Sin desconocer los logros que se han obtenido en materia de seguridad física de los periodistas, preocupa que desde hace dos años las cifras se mantienen estables, lo cual, aunque denota que la situación no tiende a empeorar, tampoco mejora.
La estabilidad de las cifras se presentó en la mayoría de indicadores de libertad de prensa con respecto al año anterior, sin embargo, en 2009 hubo un incremento en el total de las violaciones. Esto se debió a que el indicador de obstrucción al trabajo periodístico tuvo un aumento dramático a raíz del escándalo de las interceptaciones y seguimientos ilegales contra periodistas por parte del Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad (DAS), agencia de inteligencia adscrita a la Presidencia de la República.
El total de violaciones a la libertad de prensa registradas en 2009 fueron 157 los cuales dejaron 258 víctimas mientras que durante 2008 se reportaron 129 casos que dejaron 180 afectados.
Del escándalo del DAS se han confirmado 16 casos de periodistas, no obstante, se cree que el fenómeno es muchísimo mayor, pues según la Fiscalía, no se ha analizado el total del material incautado. Los primeros hallazgos de la investigación de la Fiscalía empiezan a evidenciar que desde el DAS no sólo se hacían interceptaciones ilegales a las comunicaciones y seguimientos a las actividades de los periodistas, sino que además se diseñaron manuales para amenazar, como lo demuestra la investigación de la Fiscalía en el caso de las interceptaciones a la periodista Claudia Julieta Duque, corresponsal de Radio Nizkor en Colombia.
Por otra parte, la FLIP registró con preocupación el asesinato de un comunicador por razones de su trabajo periodístico en 2009. Se trató de José Everardo Aguilar, de Radio Súper, en Patía, Cauca. Según investigaciones de la FLIP en zona, las constantes denuncias sobre corrupción e informaciones sobre política local habrían sido el motivo de su crimen, ocurrido el 24 de abril. Es el primer homicidio de un periodista por razones de oficio en Colombia luego de 20 meses. El único sindicado fue absuelto.
En cuanto a las amenazas, éstas continúan siendo una de las formas más frecuentes de coartar la labor de los periodistas y de silenciarlos. En 2009 se presentaron 74 casos, cifra que se mantiene estable en comparación con años anteriores. Sin embargo, la FLIP considera que el fenómeno es aún mayor, pues existe un alto subregistro de intimidaciones que no son reportadas.
Las regiones del país donde se registraron más ataques a la prensa fueron el Distrito Capital de Bogotá (39 casos) y los departamentos de Valle del Cauca (22), Atlántico (13), Antioquia (7), Caldas (7), Tolima (7) y Huila (7). En el caso de Bogotá, las altas cifras no significan que sea la zona del país de mayor riesgo para los comunicadores. Su alto registro de casos se explica porque es la ciudad de Colombia con mayor concentración de medios y mayor número de periodistas activos.
Respecto a los autores de las violaciones, durante 2009 se mantuvo la tendencia al incremento de los casos cometidos por parte de funcionarios públicos (26% de los casos). De hecho, el escándalo de las interceptaciones y seguimientos ilegales cometidos por funcionarios del DAS incrementó las cifras en este sentido. No obstante, en la mayoría de los casos reportados el autor de la violación es desconocido (32%) pues las amenazas, por ejemplo, son realizadas generalmente a través de llamadas o mensajes anónimos. Hay una tendencia decreciente de las violaciones cometidas por los grupos armados ilegales en los últimos años: las FARC pasaron de cometer 14 violaciones en 2008 a 5 en 2009 y los paramilitares bajaron de 13 a 10 casos en el mismo periodo.
Como hecho positivo por destacar, fueron condenados a los autores intelectuales del asesinato del periodista José Emeterio Rivas, ocurrido en Barrancabermeja, Santander, en abril de 2003. La Fiscalía encontró que Julio César Ardila Torres, ex alcalde de esa ciudad; Fabio Pajón Lizcano y Abelardo Rueda Tobón (ex funcionario de la misma entidad), planearon y ordenaron el homicidio en alianza con paramilitares de la zona. El fallo estableció una pena de 28 años de cárcel para Ardila y 26 para Pajón y Rueda.
***15.02.10. NEPAL: UN HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE CONDEMNS THREATS TO JOURNALISTS AFTER KILLING
New York, Feb 15 2010 6:10PM United Nations human rights officials in Nepal voiced alarm today over the threats made against journalists reporting on the recent murder of the media entrepreneur Jamim Shah, stressing that freedom of expression must be upheld in the Asian nation.
Richard Bennett, the Representative of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal, issued a statement condemning the threats against editors and publishers and describing them as sending "a chill through the entire community."
The threats follow the murder of the television channel operator Mr. Shah, who was shot dead in the capital, Kathmandu, on 7 February.
"Unfortunately violence against the media is not rare in Nepal and has been witnessed especially against journalists working in the Terai," said Mr. Bennett, referring to the region that runs along the length of southern Nepal.
"I urge State authorities to ensure a secure environment that facilitates full enjoyment of rights of freedom of expression as guaranteed by national and international human rights law."
Mr. Bennett's office emphasized that "freedom of expression, including freedom of the media to publish news fairly and honestly, is fundamental in a society that respects human rights and thrives alongside the rule of law and good public security."
The independent Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) reports that at least 13 journalists have been murdered in Nepal over the past decade.
***05.02.10. International Special Rapporteurs for Free Expression Highlight Critical Ten Challenges
The four international special rapporteurs on freedom of expression have released their tenth annual Joint Declaration on *Ten Key Challenges to Freedom of Expression in the Next Decade*. Brought together by ARTICLE 19 and the Centre for Law and Democracy in February 2010, the special rapporteurs have issued a Joint Declaration each year since 1999.
The 2010 Joint Declaration, which reaffirms all the previous declarations, acknowledges important advances made for free expression over the past decade, especially regarding the enormous potential of the Internet as a tool for realising the rights to freedom of expression and information. At the same time, the Joint Declaration notes both the long-standing and emerging challenges to the full realisation of freedom of expression and identifies ten key threats as follows:
1. Increasing government control over the media through a range of mechanisms, including political influence over public media, punitive registration and licensing requirements, political ownership, and the use of antiquated rules. 2. Criminal and civil laws on defamation, slander and insult, which penalise statements which are factual or opinions, or which protect the reputations of symbols, state institutions or religions, or allow for overly harsh penalties. 3. Violence against journalists and the failure to prevent and investigate such attacks, and bring those responsible to justice. 4. The failure by a majority of states to adopt laws guaranteeing the right of access to information, and the weak implementation of such laws in many states which have. 5. Discrimination against historically disadvantaged groups who struggle to exercise their right to freedom of expression. 6. Commercial pressures, including a growing concentration of media ownership and the risk that public broadcasters will lose out during processes of digital switchover in many countries. 7. Challenges to the public funding support for public service and community broadcasters. 8. National security interests being used to justify unduly broad limitations on freedom of expression. 9. Government restrictions on the Internet, through the imposition of firewalls and filters, or the blocking of websites and web domains. 10. The limited access to the Internet by vulnerable people, such as the poor, and rural or elderly populations.
*“These Joint Declarations elaborate on the meaning of freedom of expression according to different thematic areas,” *says Dr Agnès Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director. * “Collectively, the Declarations provide important guidance to those wishing to understand international human rights standards on freedom of expression.” * The four special mandates on freedom of expression are Frank La Rue, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression; Miklos Haraszti, the Representative on Freedom of the Media of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe; Catalina Botero, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression for the Organisation of American States; and Pansy Tlakula, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information for the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights..
***02.02.10. IFJ Marks 'End of Deadly Decade' With Report on Journalists and Media Staff Killed in 2009
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today issued its report on journalists and media workers who died in the exercise of journalism in 2009. The report provides detailed information of media killings, including 32 victims of a single massacre in Manguindanao, the Philippines, last November. "The report is more than just a record of the death toll of journalists and media workers killed in 2009," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "More importantly, it provides a chilling account of risks and dangers which continue to claim our colleagues' lives in the four corners of the world." The IFJ says that 2009, one of the worst years for journalists' killings, capped a violent decade which put journalism to the sword and left record numbers of murders of media people. According to the report, the death of Michelle Lang, the Canadian reporter killed in Afghanistan on 30 December and the confirmation of murder of photographer Jepon Cadagdagon in the Manguindanao massacre brought the 2009 total of media killings to 139. The Asia Pacific region recorded the highest death toll with 52 followed by the Americas with 30 killings, including 13 murders of journalists in Mexico alone. The IFJ reports warns that the levels of violence against media witnessed last year raise the likelihood of another massacre in places like lawless Somalia and gangster-ruled parts of Mexico. "The failure of governments to take seriously the issue of media protection plays in the hands of men of violence," added White. "This can only be tackled by an unwavering commitment to end Impunity for journalists' murderers."
The IFJ full report on journalists and media staff killed in 2009 is available on the IFJ website: www.ifj.org
***30.01.10. SOLIDARITE AVEC LES JOURNALISTES HAITIENS. SOLIDARITY WITH THE HAITIAN JOURNALISTS. Ecoutez le témoignage du journaliste haïtien Jean-Edouard Rigaud, correspondant de Radio-Métropole à l'ONU:
27.01.10 Haïti. Media casualties, damages mount: at least 11 journalists died in the January 12 earthquake
By Carlos Lauría/Americas Senior Program Coordinator (CPJ)
Working in an atmosphere of great confusion and grief, our sources in Haiti are compiling preliminary lists of media casualties, documenting damages to news facilities, and examining the challenges ahead. SOS Journalistes, a press advocacy group led by the prominent Haitian journalist Guyler Delva, reports that at least 11 journalists died in the January 12 earthquake outside Port-au-Prince. CPJ continues to investigate their identities and the circumstances in which they died.
Delva told CPJ that the three-story building that housed SOS Journalistes has collapsed, and all of its equipment has been destroyed. He said the premises of Radio and Tele Ginen, TV Channel 11, Radio Magik 9, Energie FM, and Radio Vasco were also severely damaged.
The World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters reports that at least 12 community radio stations in Port-au-Prince, Jacmel, and Petit Goave were extensively damaged and their operations interrupted. The two Port-au-Prince-based dailies, Le Matin and Le Nouvelliste, are still not circulating, according to news accounts and CPJ interviews.
“The small society of Haitian journalists has been dealt a tough blow from the earthquake,” wrote Trenton Daniel in Monday’s Miami Herald. He noted that it comes at time when the “independent press had made significant strides … after reporters struggled to do their jobs under decades of despotic rule."
The task is enormous, said Delva, who described it as “starting from zero.” He noted that local reporters must deal with their own personal challenges—grieving the loss of loved ones, taking care of injured relatives, rebuilding their homes, and addressing basic needs such as feeding their families. Delva has launched a campaign to help feed and shelter numerous displaced local journalists; he is also looking for help in rebuilding SOS Journalistes.
CPJ is working with local groups such as SOS Journalistes to identify needs and help direct assistance.
22.01.10. HAITI. THE PRESS EMBLEM CAMPAIGN (PEC) EXPRESSES ITS SOLIDARITY WITH THE HAITIAN JOURNALISTS. La Presse Emblème Campagne (PEC) exprime sa solidarité avec les journalistes haitiens
Not only did the devastating earthquake on 12 January in Haiti leave survivors with no food, no water, no shelter and no place to bury the dead, but it also left them with little or no information, report IFEX members. The media have also suffered great losses at a time when people urgently need aid information.
The death toll for journalists is unknown. Surviving Haitian journalists are unable to work because they have lost family and homes, reports the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) after talking to Haitian journalist Guylar Delva. Delva, 43, is the founder of SOS Journalistes, created to protect local reporters and promote professional journalism. The SOS offices have been reduced to rubble. "An experienced reporter who has covered both natural disasters and political violence, Delva said he has never seen anything like this."
CPJ is attempting to find out what Haitian journalists need right now and beginning to collect funds. RSF and AMARC are asking for donations for media reconstruction, including equipment.
The Inter American Press Association (IAPA) notes that media and communications following the earthquake were almost entirely cut off, with the exception of Skype.
Coordinating disaster relief is impossible without accurate news and information being relayed by a functioning news media. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is working with Canadian media group Quebecor to set up a media centre for Haitian journalists in Port-au-Prince, so they can report on the situation and contribute to the process of providing humanitarian aid to the population. The centre will also service international news media searching for information on Haiti, and will eventually be used to produce and disseminate news and information by employing Haitian print journalists. It will also have facilities for journalists in distress.
The premises of Port-au-Prince-based TV stations Tele Ginen and Canal 11 and radio station Magik 9 have been destroyed, reports RSF. A Tele Ginen cameraman was killed, says CPJ and RSF. According to RSF, Radio Ibo is damaged and unable to broadcast, but three other radio stations continued to function after the earthquake. The offices of newspapers "Le Nouvelliste" and "Le Matin" are still standing and the staff survived, but the editor of "Le Nouvelliste" is missing. A journalist who writes for "Ticket Magazine" is believed to have been killed.
A week after the earthquake, 20 radio stations are operating again, including the UN mission's station, due to the help of foreign technicians and Radio France, reports RSF. Other radio stations in the country survived but their equipment was seriously damaged. Many community radio stations were completely destroyed.
The World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC) is carrying out an urgent assessment of the status of community broadcasting in the crisis areas and is working to mobilise resources and technical assistance. AMARC is calling on community broadcasters to support the international relief effort by organising airtime appeals.
An Internews team of media specialists, radio technicians and humanitarian liaison experts is heading to Haiti to determine the damage to the media infrastructure. They are also taking portable broadcast equipment that can be used to quickly broadcast emergency information. Internews recently worked on a project with 40 community radio stations throughout the country.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is mobilising its members in the Americas to provide assistance to media workers in Haiti. The "Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa" (SNTP), an IFJ affiliate in the Dominican Republic, is helping investigate the status of journalists in Haiti.
RSF "hopes to get news media in countries that are providing significant amounts of aid to Haiti, such as Canada, Brazil, the United States and France, to become financial and logistic sponsors of Haitian media that need rebuilding."
***22.01.10. PHILIPPINES. International Mission Demands Arroyo Protect Media as Elections Loom
Philippines President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and her Government must take all necessary measures to provide local media with protection ahead of upcoming elections, says the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and other members of an international solidarity mission that investigated the November 23 massacre of 57 people in the southern Philippines.
Among those killed were 32 journalists and media workers.
"The massacre underlines the terrible dangers that Filipino journalists face. It also highlights the inability and unwillingness of the State to ensure the protection and safety of journalists who are seeking to perform their duties," the mission members say in their report, Massacre in the Philippines: International Solidarity Mission Rapid Assessment, released today.
The mission conducted its investigations in the Philippines from December 5 to 10 in association with the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP), an affiliate of the IFJ. The team included representatives from leading journalists' rights and press freedom organisations, including the IFJ, Indonesia's Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI), the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), International Media Support (IMS), International News Safety Institute (INSI), the Institute for Studies on the Free Flow of Information (ISAI), Australia's Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance, the Southeast Asia Press Alliance (SEAPA), the Thai Journalists' Association (TJA), and Union Network International (UNI).
"Power-holders in the Philippines must act urgently on all the recommendations of the mission's report to reverse once and for all the country's shameful culture of impunity for the murders of journalists, tragically underscored on November 23," IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said.
As the mission report went to press, the toll of media personnel killed in the massacre was revised up to 32, as it was confirmed that Saksi News photographer Jepon Cadagdagon was among the victims in Maguindanao province, Mindanao. The toll of 32 media personnel includes 31 whose bodies were recovered, as well as Reynaldo"Bebot" Momay who remains missing.
The mission team says that it holds grave concerns for the safety of Filipino journalists as the investigation and prosecution of the accused take place in a tense environment ahead of national and presidential elections due on May 10.
"This massacre, coming at the very beginning of the 2010 election process, not only undermines that process but has dealt a cruel blow to democracy and free media in the Philippines," the mission members say in their report.
They call on the Government to ensure media is able to report fairly and freely on the election campaign without undue risk. It also stresses concerns about judicial and forensic processes in view of the political ties between the Arroyo administration and the Ampatuan family in Mindanao.
Although at least 100 gunmen are believed to have been involved in the massacre, Andal Ampatuan Jr, the son of the clan patriarch, is the only person to be charged and brought before a court in direct connection to the massacre. He is pleading not guilty.
Among other significant concerns highlighted in the report is the role of Major General Alfredo Cayton, the Commander of the 6th Infantry Division in Maguindinao at the time of the massacre. The mission urges a full investigation into Cayton's role and actions preceding the massacre.
Cayton, who denied requests for a military escort to accompany the convoy that was attacked on November 23, was stood down immediately after the massacre. However, he has since been promoted to Vice Commander of the Philippine Army.
The mission further calls for an investigation into reports that several members of the Philippine National Police were involved in the massacre.
It stresses that under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1738 (2006), the Government of the Philippines is required to ensure its security forces provide the protection due to citizens in areas of conflict within national borders, including media personnel.
The mission, which Arroyo declined to meet, further recommends:
The Government and local authorities must undertake all necessary measures to fully investigate the massacre and to ensure all evidence is properly preserved and available.
The Government and local authorities must provide all necessary measures for the protection and safety of witnesses, investigators, prosecutors, lawyers and judges.
Families must be provided with legal support to pursue the prosecution of perpetrators.
Observers and human rights groups must have full open access to legal proceedings.
The Government is urged not to reimpose martial law ahead of the May 10 elections.
The mission report will be officially released in the Philippines today at the launch of an organisation of families of journalists killed in the massacre, Justice NOW! The NUJP and Justice NOW! will conduct a press conference in Koronadal City, South Cotabato, where many of the families live.
In Quezon City, the November 23 Movement, which has been convened by the NUJP, will hold a candle-lighting vigil, among other activities to mark two months since the massacre.
The report is available at: http://asiapacific.ifj.org//assets/docs/203/037/15d11cb-013d725.pdf
***22.01.10. AFGHANISTAN. La FIJ appelle à la libération des deux journalistes français enlevés en Afghanistan La Fédération Internationale des Journalistes (FIJ) fait part de son inquiétude sur le sort des deux journalistes français de France Télévisions enlevés depuis le 30 décembre en Afghanistan et appelle toutes les parties concernées à tout faire pour obtenir leur libération immédiate. « Les récentes déclarations des autorités françaises selon lesquelles elles ont reçu l'assurance que les deux journalistes étaient "en vie" sont encourageantes », a affirmé Aidan White, Secrétaire général de la FIJ. « Mais le temps passe et nous exhortons toutes les parties concernées de redoubler d'efforts pour leur libération". Selon la presse française, les deux journalistes de la chaîne publique française ont été enlevés avec trois ressortissants afghans qui les accompagnaient le 30 décembre dernier sur la route entre Surobi et Tagab, dans la province de Kapisa, sous contrôle sécuritaire des troupes françaises. La FIJ soutien les efforts des gouvernements français et afghan en vue de la libération de deux journalistes et leurs collègues afghans mais s'étonne toutefois des propos tenus par le secrétaire général du Président français, M. Claude Guéant, le 17 janvier devant la presse pour évoquer le "coût considérable" de l'opération de recherche des deux journalistes. La Fédération regrette également les propos du président français Nicolas Sarkozy rapportés par M. Guéant selon lesquels le chef de l'Etat a accusé les deux journalistes d' "imprudence vraiment coupable" et qui font suite aux propos rapportés par le Ministre de la Défense selon lequel M. Sarkozy a fustigé « l'inconscience » des journalistes.
« Il est inacceptable d'accuser les journalistes d'imprudence, d'inconscience ou d'être coupable de quoi que soit alors qu'ils cherchent simplement à travailler de façon indépendante pour informer le public », a ajouté M. White. « Cela est d'autant plus vrai dans un pays comme l'Afghanistan où l'insécurité règne partout. Cela reviendrait à interdire la présence des médias étrangers dans tout le pays ». La FIJ rappelle que les journalistes en Afghanistan comme ailleurs dans le monde font leur métier en étant présents sur le terrain pour informer les citoyens et qu'il n'est pas adéquat de parler de "recherche du scoop" quand on connait les risques d'exercer ce métier dans des zones aussi dangereuses que l'Afghanistan. « De telles déclarations sont infondées et mal avisées d'autant plus que les deux journalistes sont toujours détenus », a conclu M. White.
***11.01.10. IFJ Mourns Latest Media Death in Afghanistan, Warns of Risks for "Embedded" Reporters
The International Federation of Journalists said the death of a British journalist in Afghanistan, who was travelling with United States marines when he was caught in an explosion, was further evidence of the high risks involved in "embedding" journalists with soldiers. He was the second reporter to die travelling with the military in recent weeks. Rupert Hamer, the defence correspondent of the Sunday Mirror, died of his wounds at the scene of the blast north-west of Nawa in Helmand Province His colleague, photographer Philip Coburn, was critically injured in the blast. Two soldiers were also killed. "We are shocked by this incident and send our sincere condolences to the friends, family and colleagues of Rupert Hamer," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "His death shows that Afghanistan remains one of the world?s most dangerous reporting assignments. Travelling with the army does not lessen the risk to reporters. Indeed, as this tragedy shows, it can put journalists directly in the firing line." The two journalists were accompanying a patrol by the marines when their vehicle was caught in a bomb blast. Hamer was a distinguished journalist and a veteran of conflict reporting who had served in Iraq and was on his fifth trip to Afghanistan. He was married with children aged six, five and 19 months. He is the second foreign journalist embedded with troops to be killed in Afghanistan in recent weeks. Michelle Lang, aged 34, working for the Calgary Herald, in Canada, died along with four Canadian soldiers in another roadside bomb attack in December. "These terrible tragedies show that telling the story of conflict remains the most perilous of tasks for media staff," said White. "As we mourn and wish those injured a swift recovery we must redouble our efforts to reduce the risks that journalists face, even when we know that casualties are unavoidable." Ten days ago, the IFJ released its annual statement on journalists killed in 2009 providing details of 137 deaths of media staff, including around 113 targeted killings, one of the highest numbers ever recorded. For more information contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207 or +32 478258669 (GSM)
***07.01.10. UNESCO DEPLORES RECENT KILLING, ABDUCTION OF JOURNALISTS IN AFGHANISTAN
New York, Jan 7 2010 11:10AM The head of the United Nations agency charged with defending the freedom of the press today condemned last week’s killing of a Canadian journalist and kidnapping of two French television reporters in Afghanistan.
“Violence against journalists constitutes an attack on the fundamental human right of freedom of expression; it is therefore a direct threat to democracy,” said UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Director-General Irina Bokova.
Calgary Herald journalist Michelle Lang, 34, was killed in a bomb blast on 30 December while traveling with four Canadian soldiers in the volatile Kandahar province after spending less than three weeks in Afghanistan.
A reporter and cameraman for France 3 television were taken hostage by gunmen on the road near Omarkhil, north-east of the capital, Kabul, on 29 December while working on the current affairs programme “Pièces à conviction,” and there has been no word from them since.
“The fates of these three media professionals cruelly underline the dangers that journalists face when they go into areas of conflict to provide news coverage,” said Ms. Bokova in a statement condemning the killing and abduction.
“I call on the Afghan authorities to do their utmost to obtain the release of the French journalists, and to take measures to increase press security in the country.” Jan 7 2010 11:10AM
***05.01.10. IFJ Condemns New Wave of Journalists' Arrests in Iran
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned recent arrests of journalists and media union leaders following the civil unrest which gripped Tehran and the country last week with demonstrations and clashes between protesters and security forces. The IFJ says that at least 12 journalists were arrested, including Badralsadat Mofidi and Mashaalah Shamsolvaezin, respectively General Secretary and Vice President of the Association of Iranian Journalists (AoIJ), an IFJ affiliate. "We condemn the Iranian Government's kneejerk reaction of blaming the media over legitimate public protest," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "There is systematic repression and brutal intimidation of media and journalists under the cloak of restoring public order." According to media reports, authorities in Iran carried out a number of arrests of prominent independent journalists in the wake of last week's demonstrations which pitted protesters against security forces in Tehran and other cities in the country. Violence erupted when the authorities tried to ban a procession to mark the Muslim festival of Ashura which coincided with the death of Ayatollah Hossein Montazeri, a senior Iranian cleric who had criticized the government for its handling of the post June presidential election protests. Reports say Shamsolvaezin, AoIJ Vice President was arrested at his home on 28 December by plain clothes officers while its General Secretary Bradralasad Mofidi was detained on 28 December along with her husband Kayvan Mehregan, editor of the political section of the reformist daily Etemad. Syrian reporter Reza al-Basha who works for state-owned Dubai TV was reportedly also arrested on Sunday 27 December and detained in Tehran. The AoIJ says that at least eight more journalists were arrested last week, including Nasrin Vazere (Ilna news agency), Morteza Kazemeyan (freelance), Mostsfa Ezade (freelance), Emadoddin Baghe (freelance), Mohammad Nazere( freelance), Mohammadjavad Mozaffar(freelance), Ali Hegmat (freelance) and Mohammadreza Zohde (freelance). The IFJ has also described as "absurd" the sentence of a seven year and four month jail term handed down to Iranian journalist Bahman Ahmadi Amoui. The journalist, a critic of President Ahmedinajad's rule, also faces 34 lashes, according to media reports. "The international community of journalists will stand by their colleagues in Iran" added White. "The government will not restore order or end this crisis without respect for the rights of people to protest and of journalists to tell the story. There must be an end to the reign of terror that is being unleashed against free speech and journalism in Iran." For more information contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207
***05.01.10. World death toll for journalists shoots up in 2009 despite safety calls (INSI)
Brussels, January 5 - More than 130 journalists and support staff died trying to cover the news in 2009 despite repeated international calls for action to constrain the bloodshed.
The worldwide total of 132 dead in 35 countries, recorded by the International News Safety Institute, was one of the worst yearly tolls on record.
It was boosted by the slaying of 31 people in a politically-motivated ambush in the Philippines on 23 November, the bloodiest single incident ever recorded for the news media. That made the Philippines by far the most dangerous country in the world for the news media with a total of 37 dead over the year
More than 400 news media have now died trying to cover the story since the end of 2006 when the UN Security Council unanimously passed landmark Resolution 1738 http://tinyurl.com/yclyba2 which demanded greater safety for journalists in conflict areas and called for an end to impunity for their killers. Similar appeals have been made time and again by UNESCO and the Council of Europe.
By far the greatest number of those who died last year -- 98 -- were targeted, murdered because of their work. Over the past decade fewer than 8 out of 10 of the killers of journalists have been brought to justice.
As always, the great majority of the casualties in 2009 were not international war correspondents but local journalists working in their own countries, mostly in peacetime, covering dangerous stories such as high level crime and corruption.
"Journalists continue to die because they dare to shine a light on the darkest corners of societies," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "This is the shocking price we pay for our news.
"And this unacceptable situation will persist as long as killers of journalists walk free.
"Again, we call on the United Nations to help enforce Resolution 1738 and on all member states to respect its provisions and prosecute the murderers. http://tinyurl.com/ya68s6f
"Free societies everywhere are undermined whenever a journalist is slain because of their work."
After murder, the biggest cause of death for news personnel in 2009 was accidents with 23 fatalities, the INSI figures show. Eleven news men and women died in "crossfire" incidents such as random shootings, roadside bombings and aerial bombardment which did not appear to be directed specifically at them.
After the Philippines, the bloodiest countries in 2009 were Mexico with 11 killed, Somalia and Russia with 9 each, Pakistan with 8 and Iraq with 5.
"The one encouraging statistic over the past couple of years has been the dramatic fall in killings in Iraq," Pinder said.
"It was the most dangerous country in the world for the news media for five years after the US-led invasion in 2003, but journalists are now benefiting from a general reduction in violence there. This demonstrates that even the direst situations can improve."
Nevertheless, INSI now counts 257 news media dead in the Iraq conflict -- the bloodiest for news men and women in modern times.
The year had barely begun when the first journalist fell. Radio Shabelle reporter Hassan Mayow Hassan was gunned down by a member of a pro-government militia in Somalia. Hassan was covering clashes between Islamist militants and armed groups supporting the federal transitional government when a militiaman confronted him.
Hassan identified himself as a journalist and the militiaman shot him twice in the head.
The year also ended badly. On 30 December, Canadian journalist Michelle Lang, 34, was killed along with four Canadian soldiers by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan and Indian freelance photojournalist Aman Kashyap was run over by a train in Ghaziabad while taking pictures of fog-bound rail services.
INSI's detailed list of fatal incidents in 2009 can be found at http://tinyurl.com/mtkgkn
As a safety organisation, INSI records all causes of death, whether deliberate, accidental or health-related, of all news media staff and freelancers while on assignment or as a result of their news organisation being attacked because of its role.
***04.01.10. Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe denuncia: TREINTA PERIODISTAS ASESINADOS EN AMÉRICA LATINA DURANTE EL 2009
Treinta periodistas fueron asesinados en América Latina y el Caribe durante el 2009. México con 13 víctimas se convierte en el país más riesgoso para el ejercicio periodístico en la región. A la lista se suma Colombia, con seis asesinados, Guatemala con cuatro, Honduras y Brasil con dos, El Salvador, Venezuela y Paraguay con uno.
En Latinoamérica, en los últimos doce meses, se registraron retrocesos en materia de libertad de prensa y derechos laborales de los trabajadores de medios, en un contexto de crisis económica global que ha significado despidos masivos en algunos países.
La grave crisis humanitaria en México, se ha profundizado con los 13 crímenes de periodistas, donde se confabulan el narcotráfico y la impune inactividad del Estado. Esto en medio de una avalancha de agresiones y amenazas contra periodistas críticos e independientes que ha obligado a buena parte de la prensa a la autocensura, como mecanismo de protección.
En Colombia el gobierno minimiza los crímenes de periodistas (seis en el 2009), el crecimiento geométrico de los ataques violentos contra los comunicadores y el acoso judicial, mediante una sugestiva campaña internacional que ha dado engañosos frutos. Lamentablemente, en dicho país un proyecto de ley para despenalizar la injuria y la calumnia, presentado por la Federación Colombiana de Periodistas, fue eclipsado por los debates por una segunda reelección del actual gobierno.
En Venezuela las agresiones vienen principalmente del Estado, mediante ataques de simpatizantes del gobierno a periodistas (en un solo hecho fueron golpeados y heridos 12 colegas) y a través de la no renovación de licencias a medios de comunicación de oposición o simplemente críticos de políticas oficiales. Esta situación adversa a la libertad de prensa, está acabando con la diversidad informativa que caracteriza a cualquier sociedad democrática para darle paso a un sistema informativo afecto al gobierno.
En República Dominicana las agresiones físicas contra periodistas suman en el 2009 casi un centenar. Esta realidad se agrava al verse invisibilizados los países caribeños en todos los registros de violaciones a la libertad de expresión.
Honduras se vio ensombrecida por un golpe de Estado, con la consecuente represión contra los medios de comunicación críticos, periodistas independientes y corresponsales internacionales.
Brasil, el único país que contemplaba jurídicamente la exigencia de título profesional para el ejercicio del periodismo, perdió esta prerrogativa que garantizaba un mínimo en la calidad de la información, tras un fallo del Tribunal Supremo Federal. La sentencia se produjo bajo un fuerte looby de los empresarios de medios.
En Perú, aunque no se producen crímenes de periodistas, las agresiones superan a las de cualquier país de la región, con 180 casos en el 2009. El caso más emblemático, sin duda, el silenciamiento de Radio La Voz, de Bagua, emisora independiente “castigada políticamente” por haber dado a conocer la verdad de lo ocurrido durante la matanza criminal de policías y nativos selváticos (5 de junio 2009).
En Argentina se logró la aprobación de una Ley de Medios –de especial acento contra la propiedad monopólica de los medios de comunicación-, presentada por el gobierno, pero redactada por una coalición de sindicatos, ONG y organizaciones sociales, liderada por la Federación Argentina de Trabajadores de la Prensa (FATPREN).
En Uruguay, la Asociación de Prensa Uruguaya consiguió la despenalización de los delitos de prensa, en el mes de junio.
Los asesinatos, y las agresiones en general, han estado, la mayoría de las veces, vinculados a destapes de casos de corrupción, en la escena local, nacional o continental. Las víctimas de las agresiones no suelen ser, por regla general, directivos o trabajadores de los grandes medios escritos o audiovisuales. Salvo en casos excepcionales, las muertes tienen por escenario pequeñas poblaciones y alcanzan a comunicadores de medios locales y comunitarios o a corresponsales de grandes medios en ciudades menores.
La consigna durante el 2009 en América Latina-Caribe ha sido eliminar el mensaje. Para ello, en México, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Brasil Paraguay y Venezuela se decidió por “matar al mensajero”, con el consiguiente drama que ello arrastra para las familias, los colegas y la organización en sí misma. Se ha matado al mensajero, desapareciéndolo físicamente o silenciándole la voz. .
Celso Schroder Presidente FEPALC Zuliana Lainez Secretaria de Derechos Humanos FEPALC
PERIODISTAS ASESINADOS Enero-Diciembre 2009
Brasil (2) José Givonaldo Vieira Dalvison Nogueira de Souza
Colombia (6) María Eugenia Guerrero José Everardo Aguilar Hernando Salas Rojas Diego Rojas Velásquez Ferney Henao Harold Humberto Rivas Quevedo
El Salvador (1) Christian Poveda
Honduras (2) Osman López Gabriel Fino Noriega
Guatemala (4) Rafael Murguía Rolando Santis Jorge Mérida Pérez Marco Antonio Estrada Orla
México (13) Jean Paul Ibarra Ramírez Luis Daniel Méndez Hernández Carlos Ortega Melo Samper Eliseo Barrón Hernández Martín Javier Miranda Avilés Ernesto Montañez Valdivia Juan Daniel Martínez Gil Norberto Miranda Madrid Gerardo Esparza Mata Fabián Ramírez López Bladimir Antuna José Emilio Galindo Robles Jorge Alberto Velásquez López
Venezuela (1) Orel Zambrano
Paraguay (1) Martín Campos Páez
FEDERACIÓN DE PERIODISTAS DE AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE (FEPALC) Federación Argentina de Trabajadores de Prensa (FATPREN); Federación Nacional de Periodistas (FENAJ); Sindicato Nacional de Periodistas de Costa Rica (SNP) Federación Colombiana de Periodistas (FECOLPER); Federación Nacional de Trabajadores de los Medios de Comunicación Social de Chile (FENATRAMCO); Sindicato de Periodistas y Similares de El Salvador (SINPESS); Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Industria de la Prensa y Similares de Honduras (SITINPRES); Sindicato Nacional de Redactores de Prensa de México (SNRP); Sindicato de Periodistas del Paraguay (SPP); Asociación Nacional de Periodistas del Perú (ANP); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa de la República Dominicana (SNTP); Asociación de Prensa Uruguaya (APU); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa de Venezuela (SNTP).
***01.01.10. SOMALIA. Death, Displacement, Detention and Violence perpetrated against Somali media
The 2009 is a year of darkness, death, displacement, detention and violence against journalists and the entire media fraternity in Somalia, according to the annual report unveiled today by the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ).
In the year alone, a total of nine (9) journalists were killed either in the line of duty or in targeted brutal attacks by enemies of media freedom, making Somalia the most dangerous place for a journalist in Africa.
According to the report, also, a total of 12 journalists were wounded and 15 others arrested in a systematic and well coordinated affront against the media in the horn of African country. Another 100 journalists received death threats.
The Annual Report on Press Freedom Violations, Somalia's most authoritative publication produced in Somalia on the state of media freedom and rights of journalists, covers southern and central regions, Puntland and Somaliland. The report, this year, documents media deaths, journalists wounded, media practitioners arrested, ransacking of media houses and constant death threats which have sometimes led to journalists fleeing into neighbouring countries in fear of their lives.
“2009 became an outlandish and harrowing year as a wave of fiendish killings, arrests, death threats and intimidations against journalists reached incomparable level in the known history of Somali journalism,” the NUSOJ Annual Report on Press Freedom Violations, says in part.
The ensuing oppression and viciousness claimed the lives of media executives, reporters, photojournalists and cameramen who were all working with electronic media and also resulted in unparalleled level of journalists wounded and arrested, continues the report titled “War on Journalism in Somalia: Death, Displacement and Desolation”. Seven out of the nine journalists killed were murdered in Mogadishu. One was killed in Afgoye and another one in Beledweyne towns.
“Assassins’ bullets are felling journalists in cold-blooded murder while anger from warring sides is increasingly directed against journalists and media outlets for their coverage of events and issues related to the political and security situation,” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
“The past twelve months stand out as the darkest and deadliest period for journalism Somalia. The work and life of journalists have become worthless and dispensable while attacks against journalists continue unrestrained. Many of the killers are known but there is no justice for their victims,” Omar added.
Besides the targeted assassinations, media professionals were also caught in the middle of combat zones. Warring sides in southern Somalia regard professional journalists who are dedicated to reveal the truth as either double agents or sympathizers of insurgents or radicals. Journalists in southern regions are unwilling to step into many parts of the south for fear of their safety. This has blacked these areas from news, allowing untold atrocities to go on unreported. Journalists are exposed to numerous risks in travelling to these areas on authentic reporting assignments.
With all these painful statistics, the question is why the media in Somalia is targeted. “The death-dealing attacks on the media are happening as a result of their fierce desire for professionalism and independent reporting and their refusal to kowtow to the authorities and insurgents who are hell-bent on bringing about all sorts of heartbreak,” said Omar.
Media deaths, threats and wounds had driven many journalists outside the country or have turned many into internally displaced people while those that remain in the country, especially in the southern and central regions, were forced to practice self-censorship. Many journalists in Mogadishu, Baidoa, Jowhar, Kismayu and Beledweyne hardly question the information provided by particularly armed groups. “Several media houses have taken refugee in entertainment, steering clear of airing news and current affairs programming,” he said.
“Continuing fighting between the Transitional government forces and Islamic insurgents, lack of capacity of the Transitional Federal Government to ensure law and order as well as peace and stability; political wrangles within the TFG, elections crisis in Somaliland, selective exercise of rule of law in both Somaliland and Puntland, undue misuse of power by the Puntland administration, the fragmentation of insurgent forces, and Al-Shabaab consolidation of control in at least 10 regions have all contributed considerably to the deepening crisis against the media,” Omar added.
This fierce cruelty against media community has “resulted in a steady stream of journalists escaping from Mogadishu in search of safety elsewhere. Independent-minded and reputable journalists face a stark choice to either flee the country for their security or risk death for their journalism work.
In Puntland, physical violence and misuse of law caused speedy increase of media attacks. Journalists are accused and attacked for threatening security or propaganda against the leaders of the Puntland. Critical and independent reportage was branded as a danger to “security”, “rule of law”, and the “dignity of leaders”. Journalists complained of the total disrespect of Puntland constitution law by the Puntland Intelligence Service and police forces.
NUSOJ states that overt and covert repressions against the media in Puntland are well orchestrated. With all the efforts to make peaceful transfer of power to the new president of Puntland, attacks and intimidation remain common in these northeastern regions of Somalia.
In the course of 2009, repression and violence against media in Somaliland persisted and multiplied. The suppression reached its peak during the elections crisis, when Somaliland authorities and their cronies intensified stamping out journalists who file unfavourable reports.
“Last year’s monstrous crimes against journalists in Somalia are a constant reminder to us and to the world community of journalists that we must redouble our efforts in the fight against wanton violence and injustice. We will persevere in our struggle for change, to secure respect for media rights and for the protection of journalists,” Omar said.
“We will continue to call on governments as well as international and regional partners to take urgent action to stem the tide of severe crimes by pressurising local authorities to recognise and live up to their human rights obligations. Our aspirations are clear – we will continue to rally our journalists, media executives and wider civil society in order to seek justice, challenge repressive acts, name and shame perpetrators and, above all, give a voice to all journalists, in particular those living and working under conditions of unfairness, fear and constant cruelty,” Omar declared.
For More information, please contact: Mogadishu: Mohamed Ibrahim Isak Mobile: +252-1-5889930 / +25250491999 Nairobi: Ahmednor Mohamed Mobile: +254 711 867202
***09.12.09. IFJ International Mission Demands Justice for Philippines Massacre
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called for urgent action to provide legal support for the families of victims of the massacre in Maguindano province in Mindanao, the Philippines, on November 23. The call comes as the preliminary report of an IFJ international mission currently in Manila raises concerns over the commitment and capacity of Philippine authorities to guarantee a full and independent prosecution of the killers of 31 journalists and media workers and at least 26 other victims of the massacre. "The international community must heed the urgent appeal for help from journalists in the Philippines and across the world to take all necessary measures to pressure the Philippine Government into action and support the victims of this atrocity", said IFJ President Jim Boumelha. The report of the mission, conducted at the request of the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP), an IFJ affiliate, further calls for urgent counselling and humanitarian support to the families of the victims, including at least 75 children who have lost a parent. In many cases the victim was the sole breadwinner for families now facing an uncertain future. Thirdly, the report underlines the need for the protection of witnesses and a comprehensive safety program for journalists in Mindanao as tension rises further ahead of national elections in May 2010. "Our Philippine colleagues have suffered not only a brutal and ruthless assault on their profession and livelihood, but also incomparable personal losses", said Mike Dobbie, an IFJ representative on the mission. "Today we pay tribute to their extraordinary courage and determination to tell the world their story and, in the face of enormous personal risks, to make sure the perpetrators are brought to justice." The mission report has been produced following four intensive days of meetings with the families of those killed, witnesses, the local media community, lawyers and government officials in Manila and General Santos City. The mission team comprises representatives from leading journalists'rights and press freedom organisations including the IFJ, the Southeast Asia Press Alliance (SEAPA), the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Indonesia's Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI), Australia's Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance, the Thai Journalists' Association (TJA), International News Safety Institute (INSI), International Media Support (IMS), the Institute for Studies on the Free Flow of Information (ISAI) and Union Network International (UNI). The mission is an expression of global solidarity with journalist colleagues in the Philippines. It is being hosted by the NUJP, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) and the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ). "This massacre coming at the very beginning of the 2010 election process, has dealt a cruel blow to democracy and free media in the Philippines" the report said. IFJ affiliates and partners around the world are joining an International Day of Solidarity today, December 9, to pressure their home governments and the Government of the Philippines to assure justice for the victims of November 23 and to end to the long-running culture of impunity for the murders of journalists in the Philippines. To see the IFJ International Solidarity Mission preliminary report, go to: IFJ International Solidarity Mission Preliminary Report 091209.pdf
***03.12.12. SOMALIA. NUSOJ Expresses Anger, Condemnation over the Killing of Two Journalists in Mogadishu
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) expresses anger, outrage and condemnation at the killing of two journalists in Mogadishu today (3 December 2009) morning.
Mohamed Amin Adan Abdulle, 24 years, who is a reporter with Radio Shabelle and Hassan Zubeyr Haji Hassan, a cameraman working with Al-Arabia TV were killed in an explosion at Hotel Shamo in Mogadishu, where a graduation ceremony for the Banadir University was taking place.
Three ministers of the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) of Somalia, including those of Health and Education Ministers who were attending the ceremony and nine students were also killed in the attack.
“This is a monstrous murder. The shocking murder of Mohamed Amin and Hassan Zubeyr is coming after the murder of six journalists early this year. A circumstance where members of the Fourth Estate are murdered in cold blood is an attack on the nation, and the murderers and masterminds of this heinous acts must be condemned for their existence and acts signify severe risk for the existence of the people of Somalia,” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
With the death of Hassan and Mohamed Amin, the number of journalists killed in Somalia this year hits the eighth mark, making 2009 another deadly year for media professionals in Somalia.
“This is an ominous reminder of the fact that this is not only a tragedy for the journalists but an assault on the peace and stability of Somalia and a threat to the security of its people," added Omar Faruk Osman.
UPDATE (Dec 4) Death of 3rd Journalist in Mogadishu Blast Confirmed
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) confirms the death of a third journalist, Yaasir Mario, in Thursday’s suicide attack in Mogadishu, Somalia, which claimed nearly 50 lives, including three government ministers.
Yaasir has been operating in the recent three months as a fixer and a cameraman. Yaasir is remembered for his coverage of violence and danger-prone events in Mogadishu where foreign journalists working for foreign media organizations dread to go. He was admitted to Medina hospital while in critical condition and later died in the hospital, according to his family.
At the time of his death he was no attached to any specific media house. His death brings to nine, the number of journalists killed in Somalia since January this year.
SOMALIA: At least two journalists killed and seven others wounded in Mogadishu suicide bombing (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders is stunned and saddened by today’s suicide bombing in a Mogadishu hotel that killed more than a dozen people including at least two journalists, three government ministers and nine students.
The explosion occurred during a ceremony at which Banadir University students were being awarded graduation diplomas. At least seven other journalists were wounded. The figures for dead and wounded are only provisional.
“We condemn this attack with the utmost firmness and we express our solidarity with the two news media whose journalists were among the fatalities,” Reporters Without Borders said. “One of these news media, Radio Shabelle, has already seen two of its directors killed in the past two years, while other Radio Shabelle journalists have been killed this year.”
The press freedom organisation added: “With violence at a peak in Somalia, journalists who try to cover the country’s chaotic political situation are living a nightmare. Those who masterminded this cowardly bombing are responsible for the deaths of these two journalists. The use of blind violence must stop and should be condemned by all parties to the conflict.”
Radio Shabelle reporter Mohamed Amin Adan Abdulle, 24, and Al-Arabia TV cameraman Hassan Zubeyr Haji Hassan were the two journalists killed in today’s bombing, which occurred at the Shamo Hotel in a district known as “Kilometre 5” on one of Mogadishu’s main avenues.
Three ministers in the transitional government were also killed while a fourth, the sports minister, who is a former journalist and founding member of the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ), was badly injured and was reported to be in a critical condition.
According to the information obtained by Reporters Without Borders, at least seven journalists were injured by the blast, including Agence France-Presse photographer Mohamed Dahir.
No group has so far claimed the bombed but the Islamist militia Al-Shabaab was widely suspected. A hotel employee said one of the students participating in the ceremony detonated an explosive vest that he was wearing.
“We cannot cope with this level of violence anymore,” a former Radio Shabelle journalist based in Mogadishu told Reporters Without Borders. “Most of my colleagues now want to stop working because it has become too dangerous.”
Radio Shabelle was one of the nominees in the Media category for the 2009 Reporters Without Borders - Fnac Press Freedom Prize, which was awarded yesterday in Paris. The capital’s most respected privately-owned radio, it is also the one that has been targeted most. Its director, Mukhtar Mohamed Hirabe, was fatally shot four times in the head in the centre of Mogadishu while on his way to work on 7 June. Two of his employees were killed earlier this year while his predecessor, Bashir Nur Gedi, was himself murdered in 2007.
Concerned by the growing violence to which journalists are exposed in Somalia, Reporters Without Borders awarded a grant of 2,000 dollars last July to send 20 bullet-proof vests to journalists there.
With eight journalists killed so far in 2009, Somalia is the world’s second deadliest country for journalists, after the Philippines. It was ranked 164th out of 175 countries in the 2009 Reporters Without Borders press freedom index. 23
***23-30-11.09. SPECIAL REACTIONS MASSACRE IN THE PHILIPPINES*** (UN, IFJ, HDC, HRW, RSF, INSI, OHCHR, Art 19, Freedom House)
UN EXPERTS: MAGUINDANAO MASSACRE MUST BE THE START OF A MAJOR REFORM PROCESS IN THE PHILIPPINES (Dec 2)
GENEVA -- The brutal killing of 57 people in Maguindanao, including some 30 journalists, should be seen as a watershed moment for the Philippines, according to two United Nations human rights experts. Philip Alston, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, and Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, said that “the pre-meditated killing of political opponents, combined with a massive assault on the media, must be tackled at various levels that go well beyond standard murder investigations.”
In a statement, the two UN experts indicated that the initial responses of the Government had been encouraging. “The first step”, they noted, “is to ensure that the police investigation is comprehensive and independent, and employs the highest professional standards. It must also be followed by effective prosecutions of all those responsible for the killings.” They added, however, that the massacre also demanded a more extensive reflection on the elite family-dominated manipulation of the political processes and the need to eliminate such practices in order to assure the future of democracy in the Philippines.
“This will require a thorough-going investigation of the broader context to be undertaken by a credible and independent body, appointed with full legal powers to carry out an effective inquiry and make recommendations.” The UN experts expressed their particular dismay at the wholesale killings of journalists and emphasized that any broader inquiry into the political system would need to focus on the ways and means of enhancing protection for journalists in the future.
A third, but even more urgent step is also required according to the UN experts. “Elections in the Philippines have traditionally become occasions for widespread extrajudicial executions of political opponents. There is every indication that the run-up to the May elections will sound the death knell for many political activists.” Mr. Alston and Mr. La Rue added that “the Government should acknowledge this likelihood and immediately establish a high-level task force, with broad political support, to identify the measures that should be taken to prevent killings that occur in the lead-up to the elections”.
“The Maguindinao killings are a tragedy of the first order”, said the experts. But the challenge now is to go beyond a criminal law response and to take measures designed to protect the media in particular, and freedom of expression in general, and to prevent election-related violence in the months ahead. “The international community will be monitoring the Government’s response very carefully”, they added.
IFJ Urgent Appeal (Nov 28)
Media suffered an unprecedented attack with the terrible tragedy that struck the Philippines on Monday 23 November 2009 . The news is unfolding on a daily basis, but the latest information today is that 30 journalists and media workers have been confirmed killed with an expectation that this will rise to at least 34, the total number of journalist and media workers reported to have set out on the convoy that was subsequently ambushed and massacred.
This is the biggest single atrocity against journalists in recent history.
The IFJ is working very closely to support our colleagues at the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) who immediately sent a mission to the scene of the massacre, arriving Wednesday. According to the NUJP 59 bodies have now been found in shallow graves, often beheaded and heavily mutilated.
Prior to this attack at least 75 journalists had been killed under the Arroyo government and only four cases have seen successful prosecutions. Outside of Iraq, the Philippines has become the most dangerous country for journalists this century.
A clear culture of impunity has been allowed to flourish under this government which must no longer be tolerated.
The IFJ is sending an international mission to Manila, 7 - 10 December, to support the NUJP, provide solidarity to journalists and the families of the victims, and to send the clearest message possible to the government that this is an outrage they will not be allowed to forget.
We need your help to reinforce this message, to demonstrate our sorrow, our anger, and our determination that such a crime will not go unpunished.
To do this the IFJ is calling on all affiliates to join a global day of solidarity on 9th December to coincide with the mission press conference on the 9th, the day before International Human Rights day.
UNESCO Director-General urges full investigation into Philippines massacre (Nov 27)
UNESCO Director-General Irina BokovaUNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova urged the Government of the Philippines to carry out a full and swift investigation into a murderous attack on a convoy in the Minguindanao Province on 23 November, in which more than 55 people, including at least 27 journalists, were killed.
“This monstrous crime must not go unpunished,” Ms Bokova said. “I condemn this outrage and urge the Government of the Philippines to act swiftly, using all the resources at its disposal to bring the perpetrators to justice.
“The barbaric killings of the people in the convoy – journalists and citizens alike – were clearly an attack against democracy and democratic processes. Furthermore, the killing of journalists violates the rights of the Philippine people to be freely and fairly informed of political developments.”
According to news reports, the journalists were travelling with politicians and political supporters to file nomination papers for a gubernatorial candidate in Maguindanao Province in the southern Philippines, when the convoy was ambushed.
Their deaths bring to 34 the number of journalists killed in the Philippines this year.
HD Centre condemns brutal massacre in Mindanao (Nov 27)
The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD Centre), a Swiss-based organisation with offices in Mindanao, strongly condemns the brutal massacre of 57 persons in Maguindanao province, Mindanao, this week. The slaying of woman, children, journalists and passers-by in an act perpetrated by one rival clan against another underscores the need for urgent action. For too long, clan violence has been tolerated and allowed to undermine development, governance, and security for the people of Mindanao and the rest of the country. “Too often focused on the war on terror, the international community has overlooked the fact that violent clan politics is the principle contributor to the cycle of poverty, marginalization, and insecurity that has created a breeding ground for Islamic extremists and separatists,” said David Gorman, the HD Centre Representative in the Philippines. While this latest act was unprecedented, it was not entirely unpredictable considering the extent of clan violence throughout Mindanao. The Government of the Philippines must take immediate steps against those responsible, employ measures to prevent a reoccurrence and identify ways to eventually disarm and disband all clan-led armed civilian groups. In particular, the HD Centre calls on the Government to: 1. Launch an inquiry not just into the massacre but into the role, chain of command and lack of accountability of all armed groups operating outside the framework of the official security forces; 2. Suspend the operations and licenses to carry firearms of all armed groups currently supported by the military, the police and the local government until the elections are complete; 3. Develop a longer term plan for the eventual phasing out of private armed groups complemented by the development and improvement of the regular armed forces and the police; 4. Enforce the current election gun ban and suspend all candidates, whose supporters violate it, from running for office. Unless these steps are taken, the HD Centre believes there will be continued clan-related violence and the people of Mindanao will never be safe or secure. ***END***
RSF - Number of journalists killed in massacre rises to 29 (Nov 26)
Reporters Without Borders notes that the authorities have finally arrested Andal Ampatuan Jr, the leading suspect in the 23 November massacre of 57 people in Maguindanao province. Local reporters have meanwhile told Reporters Without Borders that the toll of journalists killed in the massacre has risen to 29.
“All the bodies have been located and identification is almost complete,” a reporter based in the nearby city of Koronadal said. “According to the local media’s tally, we lost 29 colleagues in this tragedy.” The local authorities are preparing a funeral service to pay tribute to the victims. And the government has provided financial assistance to families.
November 25th
A total of 26 journalists were among those killed in the 23 November massacre in Maguindanao province (on the southern island of Mindanao) by alleged supporters of the province’s governor, Andal Ampatuan Sr, according to journalists who have gone to the massacre site.
“This bloodbath is beyond human understanding,” a journalist from the nearby city of Koronadal told Reporters Without Borders, adding: “I have lost 12 of my colleagues in this massacre.”
“The toll from this massacre keeps rising but the governor’s son, the leading suspect, still has not been questioned by the police,” Reporters Without Borders said. “President Gloria Arroyo says those responsible will be arrested and tried but all the information coming from the field so far indicates the contrary.”
The press freedom organisation added: “Why have the governor’s son and the governor himself not been arrested? Are Mindanao Island’s power barons more powerful than the law itself? The Philippine government’s credibility is at stake.”
Nonoy Espina of the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP), who is in Mindanao, told Reporters Without Borders: “Tallying and identifying the bodies is slow, but it now seems that 26 journalists from several towns were killed (…) The government is not doing enough to arrest those responsible. How can the president’s adviser be pleased about obtaining undertakings from the governor when his son, the leading suspect, is still free? Settling for mere promises is unacceptable after this massacre.”
Victims: At least 57 civilians, including 26 reporters, who were mostly from General Santos and Koronadal (two cities in the nearby province of South Cotabato). The journalists worked for local or national newspapers, radio stations and TV stations.
The murdered journalists include Alejandro “Bong” Reblando of Manila Bulletin, Henry Araneta of radio DZRH, Bart Maravilla of Bombo Radyo Koronadal, Nap Salaysay of DZRO, Ian Subang of Pilipino Star Ngayon and Dadiangas Times, and freelance reporters Humberto Mumay, Ranie Razon, Noel Decena, John Caniba, Joel Parcon, Marife Montano, Art Belia and Jun Legarta.
The fatalities could include four UNTV reporters – Joy Duhay, Victor Nuñez, Macario Ariola and Jimmy Cabillo. Philippine news media have also named Leah Dalmacio of Mindanao Focus, Gina de la Cruz and Marites Cablitas of Today, Andy Teodoro of the Mindanao Inquirer, Bienvenido Lagarte of the Sierra News, Neneng Montaño of the weekly Saksi and Rey Merescon of MindaNews.
Suspects: A group of gunmen and policemen led by the governor’s son, Andal Ampatuan Jr, who is a mayor of Datu Unsay (a municipality in Maguindanao province) and a member of the ruling party. He has not been arrested and is believed to be at the family home in the provincial capital. According to witnesses and army officers, the governor gave the go-ahead for his leading rival’s supporters to be ambushed while travelling in convoy.
The attackers reportedly raped, tortured and beheaded some of the victims. Most of the bodies have been found in mass graves.
Where? The convoy’s members were ambushed and kidnapped at around 9 a.m. on the road to Shariff Aguak, one of the province’s main towns. The massacre took place near the villages of Salman and Malating, about 10 km from the main road.
Why did this massacre take place? To prevent Esmael Mangundadatu, a political rival of the Ampatuan clan, from running for governor in next year’s local elections. His wife, who was one of the victims, was leading a convoy that planned to register him at an electoral office.
Why were the journalists murdered? According to local reporters, about 30 journalists were accompanying the convoy in order to cover this political initiative. It is believed there were killed in order to eliminate all the witnesses of the massacre of Esmael Mangundadatu’s supporters. Lawyers and local officials were also among the victims.
Actions of police and army: Several members of Maguindanao police have been arrested and are being held in a barracks. The army has announced that the Ampatuan clan’s private militia will be disbanded.
After decreeing that tomorrow will be a day of national mourning, President Arroyo today said: “This is a supreme act of inhumanity that is a blight on our nation. The perpetrators will not escape justice. The law will hunt them until they are caught.”
Massacre Shows Arroyo's Failure to Address Impunity (HRW) (Nov 25)
(New York) - The massacre of at least 47 people in Maguindanao in the southern Philippines tragically shows the failure of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's administration to hold accountable perpetrators of extrajudicial killings, Human Rights Watch said today.
Given allegations of involvement by members of the security forces and local militias, Human Rights Watch urged the government to initiate a fully independent investigation led by the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI).
"Far too many people have been gunned down in the Philippines while President Arroyo has sat on her hands," said Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "The possible involvement of state forces in the Maguindanao massacre means that security personnel shouldn't be allowed to interfere in an independent investigation."
On November 23, 2009, a dozen family members of Vice Mayor Ishmael Mangudadatu of Buluan and about 40 others travelled to the government Commission on Elections office in Maguindanao, in the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, to file Mangudadatu's candidacy for governor in the May 2010 elections. Witnesses told the media that before 10 a.m., approximately 100 armed men stopped the group's convoy on a remote section of highway near the town of Ampatuan. The armed men abducted the group, which included at least 12 Mangudadatu family members, 12 journalists and two lawyers.
The authorities reported finding 47 bodies, including Mangudadatu's wife and two sisters. The bodies, bearing gunshot wounds, were found in the victims' vehicles and buried in shallow graves.
Mangudadatu told the media that because he had been receiving threats, he had sent his wife and other female family members to file his certificate of candidacy because he felt they would be safe. According to local media, he said, "I was expecting they will not harm them because they were all women." No security escorts were sent to accompany them as I trusted the police and military could protect them."
There are reports that the women were raped before they were killed. Police Chief Superintendent Felicisimo Khu told the Philippine Daily Inquirer that "all the women had their pants unzipped."
There are indications that the killings were politically motivated. A military spokesman, Lt. Col. Romeo Brawner, was quoted in news reports as having said, "The suspects are bodyguards of [Maguindanao Governor Andal] Ampatuan, local police aides, and certain lawless elements."
Gov. Ampatuan, patriarch of the powerful Ampatuan family, cannot run for re-election in the May 2010 elections because of a three-term limit. His son Andal Ampatuan Jr. is expected to run in his place. The governor has a paramilitary force that is estimated to number 500.
Philippine National Police Chief Jesus Verzosa ordered that the deputy provincial police chief of Maguindanao, Chief Inspector Sukarno Dicay, be relieved of his duties while the killings are investigated after witnesses reported seeing him with the armed men during the abduction. Concerns have also been raised about the slow response by the police and military to the abductions.
Arroyo condemned the killings in the "strongest terms" and vowed that "no effort will be spared to bring justice to the victims." However, today the presidential adviser on Mindanao affairs, Jesus Dureza, met with members of the Ampatuan family and told the media that, "They have assured us that they will cooperate fully in the investigation."
Human Rights Watch expressed deep concern that the administration's personal relationships with the Ampatuan family were likely to hinder rather than aid an impartial investigation into all those responsible for the killings.
"Ampatuan family members should be questioned by the National Bureau of Investigation, not having chats with senior presidential advisors," Pearson said. "President Arroyo's words on justice will ring hollow so long as the perpetrators of this terrible massacre remain unpunished."
Arroyo declared a state of emergency today in Maguindanao, Sultan Kudarat, and Cotabato City, giving greater powers to the armed forces, which have been implicated in numerous extrajudicial killings. Human Rights Watch called on the Arroyo administration to ensure that the armed forces uphold and protect human rights in securing these areas.
"Extrajudicial killings will continue to be a serious problem in the Philippines until they are competently, transparently, and impartially investigated, and perpetrators including members of security forces are fully prosecuted," Pearson said. "The history of election-related violence in the Philippines makes the lead up to the May 2010 elections a period of special concern."
Background on extrajudicial killings in the Philippines
Since 2001, when President Arroyo took office, hundreds of left-wing political party members, human rights activists, journalists, and outspoken clergy have been killed or forcibly disappeared, but only six cases have been successfully prosecuted. Although the military has been implicated in many of the crimes, none of the 11 persons convicted in these cases were active military personnel at the time of the killing. The killings surged after Arroyo's declaration in June 2006 of an "all-out war" against the communist New People's Army insurgency.
The Arroyo administration has not sufficiently investigated numerous extrajudicial killings in which the military has been implicated. It has yet to take strong action against local government-backed "death squads" in Davao City and elsewhere, and has tolerated unnecessary delays in investigations into these killings.
Filipino Massacre Reflects Climate of Impunity (Freedom House) (Nov 25)
The massacre of civilians and journalists that occurred on Monday in the Philippines is a shocking symptom of the country’s climate of impunity and the government’s inability to protect freedom of expression, Freedom House said today. The organization condemned the killings in the strongest terms possible. In some of the worst violence in recent Filipino history, almost 60 people, including at least 26 journalists, were killed and buried in shallow graves in the province of Maguindanao. The victims were accompanying supporters of a gubernatorial candidate as he filed nomination papers for elections scheduled to be held in May 2010. “These killings are of the most shocking and brutal nature and must be addressed immediately and thoroughly by the government,” said Jennifer Windsor, Freedom House’s executive director. “The country is becoming known for a culture of impunity and the government has a responsibility to demonstrate a commitment to reversing this trend.” The gubernatorial candidate, Ismael Mangudadatu, had received death threats as a result of challenging the rule of the long-term regional leader, Andal Ampatuan, Jr. As in other regions of the Philippines, local “bosses” control many areas in Maguindanao, one of the poorest areas of the country, limiting accountability and encouraging abuses of power. During the past several years, Freedom House has noted significant declines in the Philippines, both in terms of freedom of expression, as well as in political rights resulting from electoral fraud, corruption, and government intimidation of political opposition. Killings of journalists, human rights defenders, and other activists have increased dramatically, and in the majority of cases, these crimes have gone unpunished. The central government, which has close ties to the Ampatuan family, has imposed a state of emergency in two provinces and has promised to investigate the killings. "The foundations of a strong and healthy democracy are under grave threat," Windsor noted. "As the country heads toward another election season, it is vitally important that the government demonstrate that it is willing and able to do everything in its power to bring the perpetrators of the recent carnage to justice as quickly and effectively as possible.” The Philippines is ranked Partly Free in both the 2009 editions of Freedom in the World, Freedom House's annual survey of political rights and civil liberties, and Freedom of the Press, Freedom House’s annual survey of media independence.
INSI calls on UN to act on safety of journalists following Philippines massacre
Brussels, 24 November - The horrifying massacre of journalists in the Philippines underlines the need for the UN Security Council to implement fully the terms of its landmark resolution on the safety of journalists, the International News Safety Institute said today.
INSI meanwhile was preparing an emergency safety training project for news media staff in that country -- now the most dangerous in the world for journalists.
Gunmen on Monday kidnapped and killed around 46 people, including at least 12 journalists and 8 media staff, after an ambush in the southern region of Maguindanao, according to the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP). Details suggest the abductions and murders were politically-motivated in connection with the national elections next May.
If the death toll is confirmed it will be the bloodiest day for the world's news media since 2005 when 48 journalists and support staff were killed in Iran when a military plane taking them to cover exercises in the Gulf crashed near Tehran.
Recognising the deadly dangers facing journalists in many countries, the UN Security Council in December 2006 unanimously passed Resolution 1738 on the safety of journalists in conflict. It called on member states to end impunity for the killers of journalists.
"Deeply concerned at the frequency of acts of violence, including deliberate attacks, in many parts of the world against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel, in armed conflicts, the Security Council ... condemned such attacks and called on all parties to put an end to such practices," the preamble to the resolution said.
"In that connection, the Council recalled its demand that all parties to armed conflict comply with their obligations under international law to protect civilians in armed conflict. It also emphasized the responsibility of States in that regard, as well as their obligation to end impunity and to prosecute those responsible for serious violations. All parties in situations of armed conflict were urged to respect the professional independence and rights of journalists, media professionals and associated personnel as civilians," it said.
Broadcasters attending the fourth World Electronic Media Forum (WEMF4) in Mexico City earlier this month called for sustained and concrete international action to address the murder of journalists. In a unanimous declaration, sent to the UN Secretary General, the President of the UN Security Council, the UN Commissioner for Human Rights and UNESCO, they urged UN member states to respect the terms of Resolution 1738 "in letter and spirit".
Journalist support organisations around the world have called on the government of Gloria Arroyo to launch a full investigation to bring the perpetrators of the massacre to justice and to address the crisis of impunity in the murder of journalists and media staff over recent years.
The Philippines is now the most dangerous country in the world for the news media. At least 74 journalists have been killed during the eight years of the Arroyo government and only four convictions had been secured at last count.
With elections due in six months, INSI plans to hold emergency safety training sessions for journalists in the Philippines in coming weeks.
"These elections undoubtedly will be dangerous for the news media, yet the citizens of this great democracy must be kept informed. Pending concrete action by the authorities to secure the safety of all involved, INSI will do all it can in practical ways to help Filipino journalists protect themselves," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder.
INSI is a non-governmental organisation devoted to the safety of journalists and other news media in dangerous situations around the world.
Any questions on this news release should be address to Rodney Pinder, email rodney.pinder@newssafety.org or tel: +44 7734 709267
SECRETARY-GENERAL DEPLORES ‘BRUTAL’ POLITICAL VIOLENCE IN THE PHILIPPINES New York, Nov 24 2009 2:10PM Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon today deplored the recent violence in the southern Philippines, in which more than 40 civilians have been killed in the context of a local election campaign, and called for the perpetrators to be brought to justice.
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has reportedly declared a state of emergency in Maguindanao province, among other areas, following Monday’s killings which have been described as the worst election-related violence in the nation’s history.
Mr. Ban condemned “this heinous crime,” in a <"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=4252">statement issued by his spokesperson.
“The Secretary-General extends heartfelt condolences to the families of the victims and hopes that no effort will be spared to bring justice and to hold the perpetrators accountable,” the statement added. Nov 24 2009 2:10PM
Interview of the spokeperson of the Office of the High Commissionner for Human Rights (OHCHR) by the PEC Secretary-General Blaise Lempen
Le Haut Commissariat de l'ONU aux droits de l'homme s'est déclaré mercredi "profondément choqué" par le massacre de 57 civils, dont au moins 21 journalistes, aux Philippines. Il a appelé les autorités à poursuivre et juger les responsables d'un "crime terrible"."C'est un événement atroce. Non seulement des journalistes ont été tués alors qu'ils faisaient leur travail, mais aussi des femmes et des enfants", a déclaré le porte-parole du Haut Commissariat, Rupert Colville.
"Il faut absolument qu'une enquête approfondie ait lieu sur ce massacre et que les responsables soient jugés et condamnés", a affirmé le porte-parole. "Nous faisons confiance aux autorités philippines pour qu'elles le fassent, mais nous suivrons de près la situation", a précisé M. Colville.
Pas d'impunité
"Il est très important que ces meurtres ne restent pas impunis. Car cela pourrait encourager d'autres à suivre cet exemple. C'est essentiel que les responsables soient traduits en justice", a poursuivi le porte-parole de la Haut Commissaire Navi Pillay.
Les autorités philippines ont confirmé mercredi que 57 corps ont été découverts au total. Les corps de 21 journalistes philippins ont été identifiés jusqu'ici. Il s'agit, selon les ONG de défense de la liberté de la presse, du massacre de journalistes le plus grave jamais recensé dans les annales de la profession.
De plus en plus visés
"Clairement, les journalistes comme les employés humanitaires de l'ONU sont de plus en plus visés. C'est particulièrement choquant parce que les Philippines ne sont pas la Somalie et l'Irak. Malgré les problèmes dans le sud, c'est un pays démocratique", a souligné le porte-parole.
"Les journalistes ont un rôle très important à jouer dans le processus électoral. Un tel massacre pourrait contribuer à intimider les medias et c'est très préoccupant. Les autres journalistes pourraient réfléchir à ce qu'ils font et à ce qu'ils disent, ce qui minerait le débat démocratique", a ajouté Rupert Colville.
Interrogé sur une réaction du Conseil des droits de l'homme, le porte-parole a expliqué que c'est d'abord aux autorités nationales d'agir. "La communauté internationale doit intervenir lorsque les autorités nationales ne font rien. Pour l'instant, la présidence philippine a exprimé son intention d'agir. Mais cela ne veut pas dire qu'il n'y aura pas de réaction au niveau international, notamment si les intentions de Manille ne se traduisent pas en actes concrets", a conclu le porte-parole.
Article 19 - Philippines: Brutal Killing Undermines Freedom of Expression
ARTICLE 19 joins the international community in condemning the Maguindanao attack and calls on local and international authorities to take swift action to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice.
At least 39 people were viciously killed when a convoy they were travelling in was attacked in the Philippines on 23 November. The convoy was intercepted by approximately 100 men in Ampatuan town whilst on its way to register Ishmael ‘Toto’ Mangudadatu as a candidate for provincial governorship elections, Ampatuan is the home town of the incumbent governor Andal Ampatuan, and there are strong indications that the attack was politically motivated. According to the local media, Mangudadatu belongs to a clan that has been engaged in a long-running feud with the Ampatuan family, which has intermittently governed the region since 2001. This attack represents a troubling development in the Mindanao region, where Muslim rebels have been fighting for self-rule in the predominantly Roman Catholic nation.
As many as 13 journalists that were reporting on Mangudadatu’s registration are feared dead. If confirmed, this would be the largest group of journalists killed in a single event ever.
The killing of so many journalists will have a major chilling effect on free expression during the upcoming elections and in the future. There are already reports that some journalists have refused to travel to the area to report on the incident, for fear of further violence.
Free and fair elections cannot take place when the right to free expression is seriously threatened. This includes the right of everyone to express their political viewpoints and of journalists to report on political activities without intimidation.
ARTICLE 19 calls on the local authorities to conduct an immediate and impartial investigation, with a view to identifying and prosecuting those responsible, as well as to ensure that the election can take place safely and freely. We also call upon the international community to assist in these efforts.
IFJ Fears for Media Staff in Philippines Danger Zone As Massacre Toll Grows
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today pledged its full support to the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) in an urgent campaign on news safety as reports emerged that up to 20 media people died in yesterday?s massacre of journalists and political campaigners in the Philippines. Some 46 people were killed in the atrocity in the troubled Maguindanao province in the south of the country, among them at least 12 journalists and around eight media staff, according to the latest information from the NUJP branch in Mindanao. It is reported that 22 bodies have been recovered so far. The NUJP is sending an immediate mission to Maguindano to investigate the circumstances around the killings, to provide immediate support to the families of the victims, and to assess the security failings and safety needs for the region. The IFJ has made available its International Safety Fund to provide humanitarian support. The IFJ has criticised the failure of the Government of Gloria Arroya, which today announced a state of emergency in the Maguindano province, to tackle the crisis of impunity in the killing of journalists and media staff in recent years. "The Arroyo administration must make a clear and unequivocal commitment to an immediate, independent and effective inquiry into this atrocity," said IFJ General Secretary Aidan White. "With elections due in six months time the authorities must act now to guarantee the safety of journalists throughout the country." Under the current government the Philippines has become the most dangerous place in the world for media workers. At least 74 journalists have been killed during its eight-year tenure, yet the Government has not acted to end the culture of impunity. At last count, only four convictions had been secured. The journalists slaughtered on Monday were part of a convoy led by Genalyn Tiamzon-Mangudadatu, who was on her way to file her husband?s nomination as a candidate for the forthcoming election for governor of Maguindanao. Around 100 armed men ambushed the convoy and took them to a remote location before executing them. The NUJP, which has a long history of investigating murders of journalists and campaigning against the culture of impunity for killings, will conduct its own investigation in Mindanao. The IFJ is considering next steps and is supporting plans by the International News Safety Institute to organise urgent safety training for local journalists. "We extend our deepest sympathy and condolences to the families and colleagues of all those killed in Maguindanao," said White. "And we are determined to keep an international focus on this crisis. It is a traumatic and horrifying incident that means all journalists must now take even greater care."
IFJ Calls for Urgent Action over Massacre of Philippine Journalists
The IFJ has called for the international community to intervene to demand a full investigation to bring to justice those responsible for the biggest single massacre of working journalists in recent history.
The IFJ call came after at least twelve journalists were murdered when a political convoy of over 36 persons was ambushed and slaughtered by gunmen in the Maguindanao province of Southern Philippines.
"This is an event which shocks journalists around the world to the core," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "We need a strong and urgent response from the Philippine government and the international community."
The political convoy was led by Genalyn Tiamzon-Mangudadatu, who was on her way to file her husband'snomination as a candidate for the forthcoming election for governor of Maguindanao province. Journalists were part of the convoy along with several members of her family.
The convoy was ambushed Monday morning by around 100 armed men, who took them to a remote location before massacring them all. Most were shot; some were beheaded and driven over by vehicles.
According to the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) among the victims were at least 12 journalists covering the political development who were accompanying the political convoy.
This is the darkest day in the history of journalism in the Philippines, which, outside of Iraq, has topped the tables of countries where journalists are most at risk in recent years.
***19.11.09. MEXICO. Article 19 Releases Report Documenting Aggressions Against Journalists
ARTICLE 19, in conjunction with its partner Cencos, has launched a report pointing to a continuing deterioration of freedom of expression in Mexico and stating that the authorities remain the principal perpetrators of aggressions against journalists. This is the third quarterly report detailing a total of 59 attacks against journalists and the media, including the killing of three journalists, from July to September 2009. ARTICLE 19 and Cencos have recorded 201 aggressions so far this year, as well as eight deaths.
In Mexico, journalists work in an evironment where organised crime and drug traffickers operate largely with impunity, often colluding with the authorities. Usually the most serious violations, such as assassinations and forced disappearances, can be attributed to organised crime.
However, ARTICLE 19’s figures continue to point to state authorities as the principal aggressors in nearly 72 per cent of cases. The deployment of the military and police in many parts of the country have not only resulted in an escalation of violence but, in some cases, new human rights violations committed by security forces. The ARTICLE 19 report also details several serious incidents involving government officials, including the harassment of staff at the political magazine Proceso by officials of the Ministry for Public Security.
The report further emphasises an increased number of aggressions commited by supporters of political parties, during recent elections at state level and in Congress. Local police forces and municipal officials are also responsible for attacks against media workers in various states, including Sinaloa, Veracruz, Oaxaca, Coahuila, Chihuahua, Guerrero and Mexico City.
Dario Ramirez, ARTICLE 19 Director for Mexico comments: “An assassination constitutes the most severe form of aggression and is an indicator of the adverse environment in which journalists and media workers are currently being forced to operate. Many of these cases have not been effectively investigated or resolved, and this constitutes a real and sustained campaign against the right to freedom of expression in this country.”
ARTICLE 19 and Cencos calls on the authorities to make a serious effort to tackle these violations of fundamental human rights and bring Mexico into line with international standards. This includes developing prevention policies, including adequate and effective human rights training for security forces, at all levels of national, state and local government.
ARTICLE 19 and Cencos reminds the Mexican State that the right to freedom of expression, which is established in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights implies a double obligation. The state is not only obliged not to violate the right, but also to protect it and promote an environment in which free expression is allowed to flourish.
ARTICLE 19 and Cencos reiterates its call on the Mexican State to tackle the impunity that is being allowed to prevail in the majority of cases of violations of the right to freedom of expression. This can only be achieved through the effective investigation of such crimes and the sanctioning of those responsible, as well as the strengthening of the bodies that are responsible for dealing with crimes against freedom of expression.
• To view the full report Attacks on Freedom of Expression in Mexico: Third Quarterly Bulletin go to: http://www.article19.org/pdfs/publications/mexico-attacks-on-freedom-of-expression-3rd-quarterly-report-.pdf
***18.11.09. SOMALIA: 2 journalists wounded
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) condemns in strongest possible terms targeted shooting of two Somali journalists working for international news media organizations in Galkayo and Mogadishu.
Mohamed Yasin Isak , the reporter of Voice of America (VOA) Somali Service in Mudug region of Somalia by was wounded after when police officer of Puntland Semi-autonomous administration opened fire on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 around 8:00 PM local time.
The journalist, who was driving his car on his way to his office in the evening, was shot on the shoulder at checkpoint after another police man released the journalist’s car from the checkpoint. The Assailant opened fire on him in his car and one of the targeted bullets hit his shoulder where other bullets penetrated the car’s body and shattered the car’s glasses. He was immediately rushed to privately owned hospital in Galkayo. According to doctors, his situation is stable and the bullet went through his left shoulder.
The motive behind this targeted attack remains unclear, but journalist was a target for the police and the Government’s high profile members including the vice president of Puntland administration, the deputy minister of information and the police commanders.
The second journalist was wounded in less then 24 hours. Abdirahman Warsame, corerspednt of Xinhua news agency was today (18 November 2009) shot at left shoulder while he was standing before Banadir Hospital in Madina district of Mogadishu city. Abdirahman told NUSOJ that he doesn’t know who shot him and which armed group was he allied, as there was a fighting between government forces with African union troops against insurgents today in the area.
“I am in good health, only I am suffering from pain of the bullet which is still in my shoulder” said Abdirahman Warsame who spoke to NUSOJ.
Mr Isak reportedly received threats from the commander of Mudug Region Police Division Colonel Muse Ahmed Abdirahman who yesterday attended without invitation a meeting by the journalists in Galkayo city. The commander said that they are following what journalist Mohamed Yasin Isak is doing in recent days. "We know what you are disseminating these days through media" said the commander attacking the journalist. The journalists were discussing in their meeting the souring attacks and pressures from regional administration of Mudug region of Puntland after the journalists were mistreated by the police officers and some of the officers of the regional administration at meeting on regional security, which was convened by Governor and deputy Governor. When journalists came at this meeting venue at Police Division Headquarters in Galkayo some police officers started beating the journalists with the bats of AK47 and some regional officers including the regional finance secretary insulted the journalists calling them "rubbish" and “useless”.
In the evening of 25 August 2009 Journalist Mohamed Yasin Issak and his colleague journalist Abdullahi Hersi Adde were briefly arrested by the police in Galkayo. The order to arrest the journalist was issued by the deputy commander of Puntland Police. The police said journalist Mohamed was accused of sending provocative report to his V.O.A Somali section but the police did not justify their arrest of the other journalist. The two journalists were released few hours later in the same evening.
“While we wish full recovery for Mohamed Yasin and Abdirahman Warsame, we categorically denounce these horrendous crimes against media professionals and the continued bloody violence against journalists. The wounding of two colleagues demonstrate the enormous danger against journalist with which complete impunity is continuously committed”, said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
For further information, contact: Burhan Ahmed Dahir, NUSOJ Puntland Coordinator Email: burhaandaahir@gmail.com Mobile: +2525 75 19 75 Mohamed Ibrahim Isak, NUSOJ Press Freedom Coordinator Email: mohamed.ibrahim@nusoj.org Mobile: +252-1- 5 88 99 30
***17.11.09. UN REPORT CONDEMNS TRIAL IN DR CONGO MILITARY COURT OVER KILLING OF JOURNALIST New York, Nov 17 2009 2:10PM A United Nations report released today criticizes the judicial process in a Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) military court in connection with the trial of a murdered Congolese journalist, including the alleged bribery of the presiding judges.
The report concluded that the judicial process was “interspersed with several irregularities suggesting that the judiciary authorities lack the will to establish the truth” behind the June 2007 killing of Serge Maheshe, who was working for UN-sponsored Radio Okapi.
Mr. Maheshe was shot dead while entering a UN-marked vehicle in Bukavu, the capital of volatile eastern province of South Kivu. In August 2007 four civilians were initially sentenced to death on the basis of confessions, which were subsequently retracted.
Military magistrates were accused at the time of obtaining the confessions under duress, but no independent inquiry was carried out to investigate these allegations.
The report stressed that “certain violations noticed in the Maheshe case are frequently observed in other trials before military courts.”
The report on the trial – produced jointly by the UN mission in DRC (<" http://monuc.unmissions.org/">MONUC) and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (<"http://www.ohchr.org/">OHCHR) – noted that the guarantees for a just and fair trial were not respected by the South Kivu Military Court.
It spotlighted the court’s refusal to investigate other credible leads and motives likely to shed more light on the murder among the persistent inadequacies in the criminal inquiry.
In addition, the report underscored the absence of an independent and impartial inquiry into subornation charges brought against two military magistrates and a climate of intimidation and threats against the defence lawyers among the barriers to a fair process.
Echoing the report, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay urged the Government “to guarantee the protection of lawyers and human rights defenders, including journalists, to allow them to perform freely their duty, without risk of interference, discrimination, threat or reprisal.”
Ms. Pillay also called on the international community to help strengthen technical and logistical support to the Congolese judicial institutions and reinforce resources for all the members of the judiciary, civilian and military.
“We all must pursue, with the Congolese political and judiciary authorities, the independence and integrity of justice, the strict compliance with the principle of the right to a fair trial,” said Ms. Pillay, highlighting the need to adopt “a law for the protection of human rights defenders, including journalists, that complies with relevant international norms.” Nov 17 2009 2:10PM
***15.11.09. UN-BACKED MEDIA FORUM CALLS FOR CONCRETE ACTION ON MURDERS OF JOURNALISTS
New York, Nov 14 2009 12:10PM Broadcasters attending the United Nations-backed fourth World Electronic Media Forum (WEMF 4) have called for sustained and concrete global action to address the murder of journalists in peacetime and in war.
"Most journalists are killed not in war zones but in their own countries as they try to shine the light of the truth into the darkest recesses of their societies," they said in a declaration adopted unanimously at the end of a two-day meeting in Mexico City.
More journalists have been killed in Mexico this year than in any other country in the Western hemisphere, many of them for reporting on drug trafficking and related corruption.
According to the International Press Institute (IPI), seven media professionals have been murdered in Mexico this year, the most recent being a journalist whose body was found earlier this month, as well as a radio presenter killed last month.
The murders were strongly condemned by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO), which is tasked with defending press freedom, and which called on the relevant authorities to ensure that the perpetrators are brought to justice.
The declaration adopted at the Forum put the onus on governments, which it stated "are primarily responsible for the safety of all their citizens, including those in the news media. They have a responsibility to protect those citizens, pursue their killers and ensure freedom of expression."
During the Forum, Under-Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information Kiyo Akasaka voiced the UN's concern for the safety of journalists worldwide, while stressing the need to ensure freedom of opinion and expression, and the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
"Your continued vigilance in this area -- and the safeguarding of this human right -- is essential to the future and expansion of an information-based society," he stated.
Like its three predecessors -- in Geneva (2003), Tunis (2005) and Kuala Lumpur (2007) -- WEMF 4 was organized by the world's eight regional broadcasting unions.
Apart from the safety of media professionals, the meeting also addressed the relation between broadband and broadcasting, electronic journalism and citizen reporters, and the value of archives and the cost of preserving them.
***11.11.09. PAKISTAN: JOURNALISTS TARGETED BY INSURGENTS AND DRACONIAN STATE CENSORSHIP
As the Pakistani state combats different insurgent groups, increased violence this year has led to a crackdown on media. Some radio stations have been ordered to not broadcast BBC Urdu-language programs and parliament is ratifying severe regulations to control how the conflict is covered, report the Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) and other IFEX members. Journalists are also caught between the military and extremists as they struggle to practice their profession.
On 29 October, changes were made to the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) law, introducing clauses that ban the broadcast of statements from militants, live footage of a suicide bomber or terrorist attack, as well as news that is counter to the ideology of Pakistan and state sovereignty. Broadcasts are also banned that defame or ridicule the head of state, armed forces, or the executive, legislative or judicial branches of the state, report IFEX members. PPF reports that lawmakers from the ruling party and the opposition supported the amendments.
The government is combating extremists in many parts of the country under their control, but introducing a system of censorship will only obstruct plural voices and media development. "It's unacceptable for a democratic, civilian-led government to propose legislation that is essentially censorship," said Freedom House.
At the same time, PEMRA told 15 FM radio stations to stop broadcasting BBC news bulletins because of technicalities over the terms of their licenses, reports PPF, calling this international ban a "serious breach of freedom of expression."
Meanwhile, in Quetta, Baluchistan, a respected newspaper "Asaap" was shut down by a paramilitary group in August. There has been no reaction from the government, says Reporters Without Borders (RSF).
A recent situation report by the International Federation of Journalists' (IFJ) Asia-Pacific branch describes Pakistani journalists under threat from separatist groups, nationalist forces, political parties and paramilitary actors. The report focuses on the media environment in Balochistan, where journalists struggle with low wages, lack of training and resources, as well as frequent threats and violence with no protection offered by employers. Those who try to practice journalism in this tense environment tend to practise self-censorship. Some journalists must work for more than one media outlet to earn an income, says IFJ. In fact, one journalist told IFJ that he works for 11 media outlets. Others become journalists because they can find no other work; they only wish to acquire a press card to take bribes for stories, undermining the profession.
Local journalists, who work with international organisations like BBC, Reuters, and others, enjoy a better working environment but face threats from separatist groups who feel they have a right to international media space to air their views, says the report.
When it comes to security concerns, journalists are cautious not to offend any of the armed groups, says IFJ. But journalist Chisti Mujahid was murdered in February 2008 for writing about a chief of Balochistan's powerful Murree tribe who had been killed and buried in neighbouring Afghanistan.
"The Baloch nationalists often dictate to us that their reports should be published in such and such a manner," Razaur Rahman, editor of the "Daily Express", told IFJ. Journalists have been shot at, bombed, beaten and detained. Because of their writing, some have had their equipment seized; others have been told to leave Balochistan or be killed.
Despite tensions in Balochistan, Pakistan's media environment has flourished in recent years with the expansion of television and radio, providing live domestic and international news coverage, commentary, and call-in talk shows, giving diverse and critical viewpoints, says Freedom House. But the recent clampdown on independent media is a serious setback, and restricting press freedom during periods of unrest is a disservice to the Pakistani people.
***10.11.09. IFJ Endorses Joint Russian and Georgian Demand to End Media Restrictions
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today endorsed a joint declaration by the Russian Union of Journalists (RUJ) and the Independent Association of Georgian Journalists (IAGJ) that demands an end to all restrictions to reporting of the Georgian/ Russian conflict. They call for an end to war propaganda and concrete actions to promote dialogue and confidence between Russian and Georgian journalists. "This joint declaration is a major step towards ending the unjustified and enduring restrictions on journalists," said Aidan white, IFJ General Secretary. "In the face of government obstruction, the professional journalists' communities are leading the demands for mutual respect for their rights." Since the conflict of summer 2008, Georgian journalists have been prevented from accessing the conflict zones of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, while Russian journalists are denied access to the rest of Georgia. Meanwhile both governments continue to block the transmissions of media from either country. The declaration calls on both governments to respect their obligations under UN security Council Resolution 1738, that obliges governments to protect journalists in conflict zones. Both unions also demand an independent review of the misuse of media to promoting war propaganda and hate speech. The IFJ says that the long term resolution of the conflict and reconciliation between communities in the region can only be achieved when journalists are allowed to report independently, honestly and free of all restrictions. "I welcome the readiness of our Russian colleagues to develop these crucial joint mechanisms to help journalists from Georgia, Russia and other countries report freely," said Zviad Pochkhua, President of the IAGJ, "Society inside and outside of militarized regions need to receive information free of state propaganda as part of the resolution of the conflict." "The Russian Union of Journalists has frequently expressed concerns about the media coverage of the Russian Georgia conflict in August 2008. Now we have a serious partner for dialogue in Georgia in the Independent Association of Georgian Journalists and we believe that our co-operation will be useful for developing of mutual understanding between our people as a whole and our journalists in particular," added Mikhail Fedotov, Secretary of the Russian Union of Journalists. The IFJ, RUJ and IAGJ call for the urgent organizing of a meeting between professional journalists on both sides to examine the obstacles and challenges in greater depth that can map out a concrete plan to build dialogue and long term confidence between professional journalists. The declaration emerged from a meeting of IFJ affiliates from Eastern Europe and the Caucasus in Berlin to discuss the progress of journalism since the fall of the Berlin wall and ongoing obstacles to professional journalism in the region. Participants highlighted the poverty conditions and lack of minimum working rights under which journalists are forced to work, the levels of corruption in the media that force journalists to produce stories to order, increasing government interference and control, the on-going scandal of impunity for the killers of journalists, and the twin impact of the financial crisis and media restructuring that is undermining the economic model of journalist across the globe.
***06.11.09.Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) - Israeli violatiOns Against journalists were esclated specialy in jerusalem during last month
There have been disturbing violations of media freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories during October 2009. The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) monitored many of the Israeli violations against journalists, especially incidents in Jerusalem and Hebron committed by Israeli occupation forces. These included attacks on: Alquds Net reporter and photographer Dyala Jwayhan, Palestinian News Network (PNN) correspondent Mays Abu-Ghazaleh, and AP photographer Mahfouz Abu Turk as well as attacks on photographer Abdul Hafiz and Najeh Hashlamoun and the arrest of journalist Iyad Srour in Hebron.
In addition, Israeli occupation forces disguised themselves as photojournalists in Ras Alamoud, and the crew of Aljazeera was prevented from entering Jerusalem.
On the Palestinian side, the Palestinian police attacked AlQuds TV correspondent Ayman Salameh in Khanyounis city, the Palestinian intelligence services arrested journalist Sedki Mousa in Nablus city, some of Palestinian people assaulted the journalists Fayez and Bassam Abu-Oun in Gaza city, and Palestinian youth hurled a stone at photographer Atta E'ouisat in Jerusalem city.
MADA also expressed concern of a renewed campaign of incitement against al-Jazeera TV against the backdrop of Palestinians applaud (Kan Mawtini). These negative campaigns against the news agencies may lead to attacks on the press offices and crews, as happened more than once in the past.
MADA expresses its strong condemnation of attacks on journalists, particularly by the Israeli occupying forces. These attacks are a blatant violation of freedom of expression guaranteed in international laws and conventions, especially the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. MADA demands the international community to pressure Israel to stop its attacks on journalists.
The OPT ranked very low rank in the rankings of press freedom in 2009 (161 out of 175), according to a report recently published by Reporters without Borders. This low rank is a serious and worrying indication of the reality of media freedoms in Palestine. Thought the rank is slightly better than last year (ranked 163 out of 173), it still represents limited press freedoms due to frequent and serious attacks on journalists and media outlets by Israeli occupation forces and the Palestinian security apparatuses in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Details of violations
(3 Oct.) – “Falestinue 48” news website photographer Abdullah Fathi Zidan, was attacked by Israeli occupation forces in Jerusalem. Zidan said that he was beaten on the face by Israeli occupation forces when he was filming in the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Zidan added: "At about ten o'clock in the morning the Israeli occupation forces began the attack on the protestors in the Aqsa Mosque, some of them fled, and the rest stayed with Sheikh Kamal Khatib. During the attack, one of the soldiers hit me on my face causing bleeding and swelling."
(8 Oct.) - Aljazeera TV crew (correspondent Walid al-Omari, cameraman Majid Al-Safadi, and assistant cameraman Abdel Nasser Deirat) were prevented from entering Jerusalem at a checkpoint in north of Jerusalem. According to al-Omari, who is also director of Aljazeera's bureau in Jerusalem, the occupation soldiers on the checkpoint near Hizma village stopped the crew and took their identities and prevented the cameraman from filming. AL-Omari added: "We thought that they prevented all Palestinians and the Arab and foreign journalists from entering Jerusalem, and then we noticed that they allowed everyone to pass except us. The crew of Aljazeera was heading to Jerusalem to cover the events in Al-Aqsa Mosque, which was surrounded by Israeli occupation forces worshipers were prevented from entering.
(9 Oct.) - The occupation forces disguised as photojournalists in Ras al-Amoud in Jerusalem, The chairman of the Palestinian Journalists Committee, photographer Awad Awad, said that a group of citizens confirmed the involvement of a number of “musta’rbeen”(Israeli security forces unit usually dressed like Arabs) in the middle of the Palestinian demonstrators who were protesting against the Israeli practices against the Al-Aqsa Mosque on Thursday and Friday (8-9/10), and that they dressed as uniformed photojournalists and have cameras and arrested a number of young people.
(10 Oct.) – “Al Ayyam” newspaper reporter Faiz Shukri Abu Aoun (49) and the Executive Director of the Radio “Sawt Al Sha’b” Bassam Abu Oun (47) were attacked by group of people during their coverage of a sit-in near Al-Aqsa University in Gaza. They were protesting because the municipality demolished their stores. This is what transpired, according to Fayez Abu-Oun: "We has heard about a sit-in protest and when we went to the area to cover the event, a number of citizens told me that the police arrested three of their children, so I registered the feedback on my notebook. Then one of the people there tried to take my notebook I refused to give it to him and I went to the car. He followed me there and tried again to take it by force, but I refused so he hit me on the right side of my head. A large number of people gathered –there were about twenty, and six of them participated in the attack on us and on the car. After the attack we went to the Shifa Hospital for treatment, and then we went to the police station to report them, and we saw the main aggressor complain to the police, alleging that we were writing reports and sending them to “Fatah “in the West bank. Fortunately I have had contacts with a number of journalists’ colleagues, who confirmed that am an independent journalist and worked for the last 18 years in the press, so the police arrested the assailant.”
(10 Oct.) – Al Quads TV correspondent Ayman Mohamad Salameh (35years) was attacked by Palestinian police in Gaza. Salameh said that there was a problem between some citizens and police so I Went to investigate the matter to tell Al Quds TV if they want to cover the event, but the police officer prevented him from entering the area. Salameh added: “then I told him that I’m a journalist, so He aimed his weapon at me and a verbal argument sparked between us. another policeman, without knowing why we argue, he beat me with his blackjack despite that I told him that I am a journalist and the TV I work with, then a number of citizens took me to the hospital where I have suffered from bruises on my left hand and my left leg, after that I went to the police station and filed a complaint against the policeman whom hit me, so the police arrested him and released me after two days.
(15 Oct.) - Jaffa office director Iyad Sha’ban Srour (36years) was arrested by the Israeli occupying forces in Hebron. His mother said that the Israeli occupation forces knocked at their door at about 1:30 am and asked everybody to leave the house,” we asked Iyad to wake up because he was sleeping, when he was out they arrested and cuffed him, and he was taken away to unknown place, later we heard that he was transferred to Ofer detention camp near Ramallah”. Srour was arrested by Palestinian Intelligence on 14october 2008 and was released on the ninth of last September.
(21 Oct.) – The freelance journalist Sidqi Mohammed Salameh (25 years) was arrested by Palestinian intelligence in Nablus. Salameh’s father said that Palestinian intelligence called him as part of an investigation throughout the four days preceding his arrest. On 21 October he went to the interview and was arrested that day. Sidqi had returned from Jordan lately, after he finishing the preparation of a master degree in the media.
(25 Oct.) – Alquds Net news website correspondent and photographer Dyala Jwayhan was attacked by Israeli police in Jerusalem. Jwayhan reported that members of the police assaulted and beat her after she took a picture of an Israeli police officer assaulting an elderly man. So one of them beat her, pressed his leg on her foot strongly, and ripped her T-shirt. Jwayhan added: "There was a group of women who tried to protect me, but the Israeli police started to shout, saying they would get out of the mosque only if I was arrested. After that the women called the ambulance, and when the ambulance came the police left. They took me to hospital in Jerusalem, and the doctor diagnosed my case, saying that I was suffering from severe bruises in the neck and back and a torn muscle in my foot”.
(25 Oct.)- Palestinian News Network correspondent (PNN), Mays Abu-Ghazaleh, was assaulted by Israeli police in Jerusalem as she tried to enter Al-Aqsa Mosque. According to Abu-Ghazaleh, one of the soldiers closed the metal barrier on her right leg resulting in a slight injury, bruises, and swelling. Mays added that the soldier tried several times to close the barrier on her body but she was got away at the right moment, but the last time when she was turning back, the police quickly closed the barrier on her leg, and he said to her in a bad tone: " Watch out. " Abu-Gazalah also said that she saw a member of the foreign press was beaten and some of her teeth were broken, but she could not identify her.
(25 Oct.)- AP photographer Mahfouz Mohammed Abu Turk (60 years) was attacked by Israeli special guards in Jerusalem; Abu Turk said that he was beaten severely by special guards before the noon prayer when he was in the old city. The guard pushed him into a corner and beat him with batons, feet and hands, but some Palestinian youth came and dragged him from the corner and gave him assistance. The attack caused him severe pain in the left foot and right knee and bruises in the back.
(25 Oct.)- “Yediot Aharonot” newspaper photographer Atta E’oissat was injured by a stone in Jerusalem. E’oissat said that he was wounded in his left leg by a stone thrown at him by Palestinian youth, as he tried to convince a number of young men that the foreign journalists who were accompanying him were not soldiers disguised as journalists. This followed the incident where Israeli occupation forces had disguised themselves as photojournalists in the neighborhood of Ras al-Amoud on (8-9 October).
(28 Oct.)) A for the European Agency (EPA) photographer, Abdel-Hafiz Hashlamoun, was assaulted by the Israeli occupying forces in Hebron. Hashlamoun reported that one of the Israeli soldiers beat him with the gun on his waist, and kicked his feet when he was filming the soldiers shoveling the Palestinians farms in the east of Hebron. He sustained injuries including bruises and scratches on his body and severe pain in his waist.
(28 Oct.) (ABA) agency photographer Najeh Hashlamoun was attacked by Israeli soldiers in Hebron. Hashlamoun reported that the Israeli Civil Administration workers hit him with his camera in his face when he was photographing them when they were destroying irrigation pipes to Palestinian farmers in the east of Hebron. The blows caused bleeding in his mouth. Hashlamoun added that the workers also tried to attack Reuter’s photographer Nayef Hashlamoun, but the Palestinian farmers protected him. Contact: Riham Abu Aita Public Relation Office Ramallah info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com www.madacenter.org
***05.11.09. PAKISTAN. TOP NEWS MANAGERS AGREE ON TV COVERAGE GUIDELINES
ISLAMABAD - Top news managers from Pakistan’s eight television channels have evolved a first-of-its-kind voluntary framework to standardize professional guidelines governing terrorism coverage.
Representatives of KTN, Samaa, DawnNews, Dunya, Express News & Express 24/7, ARY, Geo and Aaj television met in Karachi this weekend to successfully conclude a two-week long internal debate on how best to respond to viewer feedback on reporting incidents where large scale loss of human life has occurred. The group, comprising key news decision-makers in their respective organisations, recognized that the public’s abiding trust in the media placed a heavy responsibility on news-managers to further improve the quality of news product.
Applying their collective experience and judgment, they agreed on harmonizing existing professional methods to perform the task of honest reporting in these times of extreme crisis and national danger.
Members of the group, a voluntary gathering open to all, agreed among themselves that formalization of policies on reporting and news gathering in terrorism-related cases was needed.
The areas where the agreement was reached pertained to field and live reporting, viewer exposure to extreme and disturbing visuals, dead bodies, badly injured people, accounts of the emotionally-distraught as well as eye-witnesses, and real-time decisions on releasing information during war or in the case of hostage-situation.
The news managers decided that they will desist from showing graphic and disturbing images on the screen, and as and when required, utilize a delay mechanism in their transmissions. This will enable the channels to edit out undesirable footage. The news managers also developed a consensus on putting greater efforts to check information before flashing breaking news about bomb blasts etc.
The news managers also agreed to exercise extreme caution when covering incidents involving hostages. They decided that in such situations they will take all steps necessary to ensure that information being relayed through the channels does not, in any way, help the hostage-takers.
Better training for camera crew, safety orientation of reporters were other areas where the group agreed to implement swift measures in line with the potential and constraints of each channel. They also agreed to introduce strict safety measures for their crews covering disaster situations.
They also requested all TV channels to cooperate with them in following these voluntary guidelines, and welcomed suggestions to further improve their coverage.
The news managers agreed among themselves that more discussions of this sort with their colleagues from other channels were required to further elaborate this framework. Through such discussions, Pakistan’s news channels would be able to honour the faith hundreds of millions of viewers have reposed in them, and who look up the Pakistani media as the most trustworthy institution central to the struggle for a better, prosperous, democratic and secure Pakistan.
The news managers reiterated that these voluntary guidelines drafted by them would further enhance the professionalism of Pakistani channels. They resolved to implement these decisions to the best of their abilities. The Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) has already given its voluntary Code of Conduct on coverage of terrorism to the government. Now since the news managers have also agreed to voluntarily follow their own set of guidelines, they called upon the government to desist from imposing any guidelines formulated by official functionaries, as such guidelines would be seen as restrictions that would run counter to the spirit of freedom of expression. They also called upon the government and the military to stop pulling channels off-air as such moves are counter-productive.
The top news managers also decided to hold such meetings on a regular basis with the aim to review such matters, and improve and revise these guidelines if and when the need is felt.
The news managers who formulated these guidelines included the following: Azhar Abbas (Managing Director, Geo News); Syed Talat Hussain (Executive Director Aaj News); Abbas Nasir (Editor, DawnNews & Dawn); Ali Qazi (CEO, KTN); Tariq Wasi (Head of Operations, ARY Digital Network); Mohsin Raza (Director News ARY News); Fahd Husain (Director News, Express News & Express 24/7); Owais Tohid (Director News, Dunya TV); Nasim Zehra (Director Current Affairs, Dunya TV); Amir Zia (Director Current Affairs, Samaa TV)
***30.10.09. PAKISTAN. The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) is very concerned by the ban on media. Information is crucial for the respect of international humanitarian law in a conflict zone. Pakistan is the second most dangerous place for journalists around the world. See below the latest information of our correspondent in Pakistan.
URGENT - Standing Committee of National Assembly on Information headed by the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), MNA Ms Beelum Hassnain on Thursday, has recommended restrictions on media including ban on live coverage of events, suggesting issuance of notices and sentences upto three years, fined up to 10 milion. Its almost the revival of PEMRA amended Ordinance, 2007 imposed by former military ruler Pervez Musharraf on November 3, 2007 when he had imposed emergency in the country. Under the recommendations, which government will now move in the form of Bill in the NA, no channel will be allowed to broadcast footage of a suicide bomber, bodies of victims of terrorism, any criticism on President, defame the PM or the army. Anchors will not say anything which can create confusion or hatred. No ancherperson, moderator or host will propagate anything against ideology of Pakistan or sovereignty or security of the country or anything which can create law and order. They will not be allowed to say anything against the judiciary or do a programme which defame or bring to ridicule the head of the State, armed forces or the executive or legislative or judicial organ of the State. Surprisingly, all the political parties in the Parliament, who have representation in the committee backed the recomendations. It was proposed unanimously. If enforced into a law, Its nothing but complete ban. The news has come at a time when the country will observe November 3, 2007 as "Black Day." against the impoisition of emergency in the country two years back and against the ban on media. Mazhar Abbas, Ex-Secretary General, PFUJ
***29.10.09. TUNISIE - Mise à exécution des menaces présidentielles à l'encontre de journalistes indépendants
Paris-Genève-Copenhague, le 29 octobre 2009. L’Observatoire pour la protection des défenseurs des droits de l’Homme, un programme conjoint de la Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l’Homme (FIDH) et de l’Organisation mondiale contre la torture (OMCT), et le Réseau euro-méditerranéen des droits de l’Homme (REMDH) expriment leur plus vive inquiétude suite aux actes de harcèlement à l’encontre des journalistes tunisiens MM. Taoufik Ben Brik, Slim Boukhdir et Mouldi Zouabi.
Ces trois journalistes se sont particulièrement mobilisés ces dernières semaines afin de dénoncer les pratiques et actes contraires aux normes internationales qui se sont multipliés dans le contexte électoral, et nos organisations craignent que les actes de répression dont ils sont l'objet fassent partie "des mesures" annoncées par le Président Ben Ali "contre quiconque émettra des accusations ou des doutes concernant l’intégrité de l’opération électorale, sans fournir de preuves concrètes". Le Président tunisien a par ailleurs stigmatisé, à la veille du scrutin du 25 octobre 2009, ceux qu’il avait qualifié de "minorité infime de Tunisiens qui dénigrent leur pays en s’appuyant sur des parties étrangères".
Ainsi, le 29 octobre 2009 vers 13h00, M. Taoufik Ben Brik, journaliste et membre fondateur du Conseil national pour les libertés en Tunisie (CNLT), a été écroué au centre de détention préventive de Bouchoucha, suite à sa convocation au commissariat un peu plus tôt dans la matinée. Il comparaîtra le 30 octobre devant un juge pour "agression". Cette accusation aurait été formulée sur la base d'une plainte déposée par une femme affirmant s'être faite agresser suite à un accrochage entre son véhicule et celui de M. Ben Brik. Selon les informations reçues, l'auteure de la plainte a en réalité embouti la voiture de M. Ben Brik le 22 octobre, avant de l'insulter, de le violenter et de lui déchirer ses vêtements, cherchant manifestement à le faire réagir. M. Ben Brik ne se serait quant à lui rendu à aucun moment responsable d'actes de violence.
Par ailleurs, le 28 octobre, M. Slim Boukhdir, journaliste et membre fondateur de l’association de défense des libertés “Liberté et équité”, a été victime d'un enlèvement devant chez lui par des inconnus en civil, qui lui ont bandé les yeux, l'ont forcé à monter à bord d'un véhicule puis l'ont conduit sur la colline du Belvédère (hauteurs de Tunis) où ils l'ont passé à tabac. M. Boukhdir, dépouillé de ses vêtements, de son portefeuille et de son téléphone, a été laissé sur les lieux, souffrant d'une fracture au nez et de plusieurs hématomes.
Le même jour, des inconnus ont tenté à trois reprises de forcer la porte du domicile de M. Moudi Zouabi, correspondant du journal panarabe basé à Londres Al Quds Al Arabi, du site Internet de la chaîne de télévision satellitaire Al-Arabiya. M. Zouabi a fait appel à la police qui s'est rendue sur les lieux, mais n'a rien constaté de préoccupant. M. Zouabi serait en outre suivi de très près par des policiers depuis plusieurs jours.
En outre, M. Zouhair Makhlouf, membre de l’association "Liberté et équité", membre dirigeant du Parti démocrate progressiste (PDP) et ancien candidat aux élections législatives du 25 octobre 2009, incarcéré depuis le 21 octobre 2009 à la prison de Mornaguia près de Tunis, comparaîtra devant le tribunal de première instance de Grombalia le 3 novembre 2009.
L'Observatoire et le REMDH dénoncent la poursuite des actes de harcèlement extrêmement préoccupants à l'encontre des défenseurs des droits de l'Homme tunisiens, et appellent la Délégation de la Commission européenne à Tunis ainsi que les ambassades d'Etats-membres de l'Union européenne en Tunisie à rendre visite à MM. Ben Brik et Makhlouf en détention, et à observer les audiences à leur encontre, conformément aux Lignes directrices de l'UE relatives aux défenseurs des droits de l'Homme.
Nos organisations appellent également la Délégation et les ambassades mentionnées ci-dessus à faire un rapport public, et si possible conjoint, sur les violations des règles relatives à un procès équitable et sur tout autre sujet de préoccupation constatés lors des audiences.
L’Observatoire et le REMDH demandent par ailleurs aux autorités tunisiennes de :
· Garantir en toutes circonstances l’intégrité physique et psychologique de MM. Taoufik Ben Brik, Slim Boukhdir, Mouldi Zouabi et Zouhair Makhlouf, ainsi que de l’ensemble des défenseurs des droits de l'Homme tunisiens ;
· Procéder à la libération immédiate et inconditionnelle de MM. Taoufik Ben Brik et Zouhair Makhlouf, arbitrairement détenus ;
· Mener sans délai une enquête indépendante, impartiale et transparente sur les actes de harcèlement et de violence mentionnés ci-dessus, et en rendre les résultats publics, afin d’identifier les responsables, de les traduire devant un tribunal garantissant un procès équitable conformément aux principes de droit international ;
· Veiller à ce qu’un terme soit mis à toute forme de menaces et de harcèlement - y compris judiciaire - à l’encontre de MM. MM. Taoufik Ben Brik, Slim Boukhdir, Mouldi Zouabi et Zouhair Makhlouf, et de l'ensemble des défenseurs des droits de l’Homme tunisiens;
Plus généralement, nos organisations appellent la Tunisie à se conformer aux dispositions de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l’Homme et aux instruments régionaux et internationaux relatifs aux droits de l’Homme et particulièrement l’article 1 de la Déclaration sur les défenseurs des droits de l’Homme, adoptée par l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies le 9 décembre 1998, “chacun a le droit, individuellement ou en association avec d’autres, de promouvoir la protection et la réalisation des droits de l’Homme et des libertés fondamentales aux niveaux national et international”.
***20.10.09. RSF INDEX HIGHLIGHTS ERITREA, NORTH KOREA AND TURKMENISTAN WORST PLACES FOR JOURNALISTS.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) released its latest press freedom index on 20 October, showing how European countries, Israel and Iran have all slid in the rankings. The index ranks the degree of press freedom throughout the world as well as efforts made by governments to protect journalists' rights.
Although the first 13 places are held by European countries, many have fallen in the index: "It is disturbing to see European democracies such as France, Italy and Slovakia fall steadily in the rankings year after year," RSF said. "Europe should be setting an example as regards civil liberties.. How can you condemn human rights violations abroad if you do not behave irreproachably at home? The Obama effect, which has enabled the United States to recover 16 places in the index, is not enough to reassure us."
The United States now ranks at 20 because President Barack Obama is "less hawkish" than his predecessor, says RSF. However, the U.S. also has an additional ranking at 108 specifically for its extraterritorial actions. Both the U.S. and Israel have rankings for their actions outside their own countries.
Israel's military offensive in the Gaza Strip has affected its ranking as it dropped 47 places to 93, falling behind several other countries in the region. Journalists have been illegally arrested and imprisoned. Israel received a second ranking at 150 for its extraterritorial actions. Around 20 journalists were injured by the Israeli military forces in the Gaza Strip and three were killed while covering the conflict.
The main threat in Europe comes from new legislation that compromises the work of journalists, says RSF. In Slovakia (44) the culture minister wields great influence over publications. In the Western world, Canada also dropped a few spots to 19.
Scandinavia comes out on top. Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Norway and Sweden share first place as the five freest countries for the media.
In Iran, automatic prior censorship, state surveillance of journalists, mistreatment, illegal arrests and imprisonment has now brought its ranking close to the worst cluster of states for press freedom. It ranks 172, followed by Turkmenistan (173), North Korea (174) and Eritrea (175). Burma remains at the bottom, right behind Iran at 171. Laos, China and Vietnam round out the cluster of Asian countries in the bottom ten.
In Sri Lanka (162), the state sentenced a journalist to 20 years in prison while other journalists under threat are forced to flee the country, says RSF. Pakistan came in at 159, "crippled" by murders of journalists caught between the military and the insurgency. It shared a record with Somalia for the world record of journalists killed during the RSF review period.
In Yemen (167) journalists continue to "pay for the government's scorched-earth policies towards any form of separatism." A similar downward trend has occurred in Syria (165). In Africa, violence takes the worst toll in countries like Somalia (164) and Democratic Republic of Congo (146).
And in the Americas, Venezuela (124) is now among the region's worst press freedom offenders, dropping down close to Colombia (126) and Mexico (tied with Gambia at 137). Honduras comes in at 128 after the recent coup d'état. Cuba, where RSF says "where press freedom is non-existent," holds a spot in the bottom ten.
The index is drawn from a questionnaire completed by hundreds of journalists and media experts around the world. Countries are given a ranking and score based on press freedom violations from September 2008 through August 2009. It takes into consideration physical assault, imprisonment and murder of journalists, as well as censorship, confiscation of newspapers, harassment and the degree of impunity enjoyed by those responsible for press freedom violations. It includes the measure of self-censorship and the ability of media to investigate and challenge those in power, among many more criteria.
***10.10.09. Violations of media freedoms in the Palestinian territories continued during September 2009 (Mada)
Last September witnessed renewed violations of media freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories, where Israeli occupation forces continued to target journalists who cover demonstrations against the construction of the separation wall and settlement expansion. Three journalists were wounded by shooting tear gas canisters and bullets. Those are the Reuters photographer Abd Al- Rahim Qousini, cameraman Hamouda A’mireh and the Israeli photographer David Reid.
In the Gaza Strip, security forces detained Maan Agency correspondent, Ibrahim Qanan, and its cameraman Mohammad Ghabayen, and prevented the editor in chief of Seyasat Magazine, Dr. Atef Abu Saif, from travel. In the West Bank, security forces arrested the former Al-Aqsa TV cameraman Osaid Amarneh.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) welcomes the release of journalists Iyad Srour on 9 Sep. and Osaid Amarneh on 16 Sep. from the Palestinian Authority's prisons and the release of Mohammad Al-Qiq on 6 Sep. from the Israeli prisons. MADA demands the cessation of violations against journalists, the release of the prisoners of them, and respect the right to freedom of opinion and expression guaranteed in the Palestinian basic law and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Details of violations
(1 Sep.) - Ma'an News Agency correspondent in the Gaza Strip, Ibrahim Mohammad Qanan (36 years), its cameraman Mohammad Ghabayen and their car driver, were detained by the Palestinian internal security force in the city of Khan Younis in the northern Gaza Strip. Qanan said that they were preparing a report in that morning on the suffering of people whose houses have been demolished in Khan Younis Refugee Camp. During conducting an interview with one of the citizens in his house, a group of internal security raided the house and asked them to stop filming, confiscated the camera and their mobile phones, and then asked them to accompany them to their headquarters. One of their vehicles was moving before our car and another vehicle following it. They interrogated us about the party for which we work and if we whether we prepare the report for the benefit of “Palestine Public TV”. They said that they work with Maan Agency and they have nothing to do with Palestine TV. Three hours later, they were released and returned them the camera and mobile phones. The Interior Ministry had banned the work of the official Palestine Public TV work in the Gaza Strip on March 4, 2008, and the Government of Dr. Salam Fayyad in Ramallah has banned the work of Al-Aqsa TV of Hamas in the West Bank on 16 September 2007.
(4 Sep.) Freelance cameraman Hamouda Saed A’mireh (29 years) and the Israeli photographer David Reed were injured by the Israeli occupation forces in the village of Ni'lin, west of Ramallah. Hamouda said that he was covering the weekly march against the Apartheid Wall in Ni'lin, with a number of photojournalists. After the march, clashes have occurred between some young men and the occupation soldiers in the village where eight military vehicles gathered, and suddenly one of the soldiers fired a volley of live bullets towards him, wounding by bullet shrapnel in his right foot. Reid, who was standing next to him, was also wounded by shrapnels in his right leg. Hamouda emphasized that the soldier was targeted them directly because "he saw us clearly and the distance between us was less than a hundred meters". Amireh is also working as a cameraman for the Popular Committee against the Wall in Ni'lin.
(4 Sep.) – Former Al-Aqsa TV cameraman, Osaid Amarneh, (24years) was arrested by the Palestinian intelligence force in Bethlehem. Amarneh said that he received a call at about 10:00 pm from the headquarters of the force and they asked him to come to headquarters for a short time. When he arrived, he was questioned whether he returned to work with the Al-Aqsa TV and he was also asked about the work of some correspondents of Al-Aqsa TV in the West Bank. The interrogation continued until about one o'clock in the morning, and then they told him that they will release him the same day, but he remained detained until 16 Sep. Amarneh was arrested several times by Palestinian security forces and he was forced to sign a pledge not to work with Al-Aqsa TV.
(8 Sep.) - Ma'an News Agency correspondent in the Gaza Strip, Ibrahim Mohamad Qanan, and its cameraman, Mohammad Ghabayen, were detained by the Palestinian internal security force. Qanan said that they were preparing a television report about Khan Yunis refugee camp (Gaza strip) and the services provided by UNRWA to the population of the camp, when a vehicle of internal security stopped near them, and its members questioned him about the party to which he works and whether he works for “Palestine Public TV”, and he will be harmed if he works with it.
(14 Sep.) – Periodic Seyasat Magazine editor in chief, Dr. Atef Abu Saif, was prevented from traveling by Palestinian security forces in the Gaza Strip. Abu Saif said that he went to the Rafah crossing; however, the internal security force told him that he is forbidden to travel. He repeated trying for the next two days, but he again faced prevention. The security forces have also prevented him from traveling through the Erez crossing on 12August. He confirmed that his prevention from traveling was because of the political comment he made for Palestine Television which raised the ire of the Internal Security Force. This was evident when they spoke to him on the subject and told him that this will probably negatively affect him. Abu Seif, who wrote four novels and short stories and works as a lecturer in political science at Al Azhar University intended to travel to Britain and the United States on a tour of literary and academic purposes.
(25 Sep.) – Reuter’s photographer Abd Al-Rahim Omar Qousini (36 years) was injured by gas canisters fired by Israeli occupation soldiers in Iraq Burin village near the city of Nablus (West Bank). Qousini said that he was covering an anti-settlement march in the village with a group of photojournalists (Chinese agency photographer Ayman Noubani, the Associated Press cameraman Aref Toffaha and Reuter’s cameraman Ashraf Abu Shawish), when the Occupation soldiers fired tear gas canisters against the demonstrators, and suddenly the soldiers turned towards them where were standing about fifteen meters distant to their side and they asked them to leave the area, but they refused and they have fired three tear gas canisters at them . “Although I put on an anti-gas mask, I felt I was unable to breathe due to the density of gas. I took off the mask and ran away, but I fell on a stone wall and I was faint for half an hour”. The ambulance crew in the location provided first aid for him and he returned to his normal situation after about an hour.
***06.10.09. Human Rights Council Adoption of Freedom of Expression Resolution - (US press release)
U.S. Department of State October 6, 2009 "The governments of the United States and the Arab Republic of Egypt take this opportunity to underscore the constructive partnership between our two nations in sponsoring the landmark resolution on the freedom of expression passed October 2 by the UN Human Rights Council. The United States and Egypt further note that this important resolution, the first of its kind in many years, enjoyed the co-sponsorship of 49 nations from around the world. The resolution, through which consensus was restored in the Human Rights Council on an issue marred by controversy in recent years, is a reflection of an open and genuine dialogue on freedom of expression. It unequivocally supports free speech and recognizes the central role open debate plays in combating racism, xenophobia, and other forms of intolerance.
In adopting this resolution, the Human Rights Council gives clear voice to a shared international understanding of the responsibilities of governments to condemn and address hate speech and to promote respect and tolerance."
02 October 2009 United States Working to Bridge Gaps in U.N. Human Rights Council
Assistant Secretary Brimmer says it is important for the United States to be part of the council charged with defending human rights.
By Stephen Kaufman Staff Writer
Washington — The first session of U.S. participation in the United Nations Human Rights Council has been “a terrific learning experience,” and although the United States will not always agree with the body’s opinion, “it’s important that we’re in there defending the values we hold dear,” says Esther Brimmer, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for international organization affairs.
Speaking at the State Department October 2, Brimmer highlighted a resolution the United States co-sponsored with Egypt that affirms “the fundamental universal values of freedom of speech, opinion, expression and freedom of the media.”
The measure addresses free speech interference practiced against journalists, writers, Internet users and human rights activists and “confirms the central role of free speech, open debate and the battle of ideas in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance,” she said.
In co-sponsoring the resolution, the Obama administration “thought it was important to bridge gaps that have appeared in the past in the Human Rights Council, and to bring together Western states, [Organization of the Islamic Conference] member states, and to transcend previous gaps here,” she said. (See “U.S. Emphasizes Freedom of Expression at Human Rights Council.”)
The resolution is significant for setting the norms by which all countries are judged on free speech issues, and Brimmer said the Human Rights Council is also implementing a mechanism known as the Universal Periodic Review that requires all U.N. member states to regularly discuss their human rights records.
Along with reinforcing human rights standards, the resolution and the periodic review will provide support to human rights defenders who can use those standards to “support the human rights they’re trying to claim at home.”
The council’s three week-session, which concluded October 2, also discussed human rights in Burundi and Cambodia, and strengthened the mandate of the U.N.’s independent expert on Somalia. It also adopted a U.S. co-sponsored resolution on judicial independence and passed other measures including resolutions on HIV/AIDS and extreme poverty, Brimmer said.
The United States often has been critical of the Human Rights Council, describing it as a “flawed” institution that spends a disproportionate amount of its time condemning Israel. (See “Obama Administration Seeks Greater Involvement with U.N.”)
The Obama administration did not agree with all of the council’s actions, but “that was not our expectation,” Brimmer said. “We have, however, launched an effort to build new partnerships and strengthen dialogue to transcend some of the common impediments to multilateral effectiveness,” she added.
“It's important that we're in there defending the values we hold dear. That's why we wanted to rejoin the council. We wanted to be part of making the case of why human rights are important, [to] be the ones who are standing up for universality and standing with those who share those values, and we have to be in the body in order to do that,” she said.
Asked about the Goldstone report which reported on alleged Israeli and Palestinian human rights violations during the December 2008-January 2009 violence in Gaza, the assistant secretary said the United States has “serious concerns about the report’s unbalanced focus on Israel, its sweeping factual and legal conclusions, and many of its recommendations.”
However, the report contains “serious allegations” concerning violations of international human rights and humanitarian law which “need follow-up.” Both sides are encouraged to undertake domestic investigations by the report and “look at their responsibilities in that regard,” she said.
Brimmer also said the United States appreciates the U.N.’s decision to defer consideration of the report for an additional six months.
What foreign affairs decisions should President Obama consider? Comment on America.gov’s blog Obama Today.
***02.10.09. United Nations: ARTICLE 19 Cautiously Welcomes New Resolution on Freedom of Expression
ARTICLE 19 welcomes the Resolution on the Right to Freedom of Expression adopted by consensus today at the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). We regret however that ARTICLE 19’s recommendations to strengthen the protection of freedom of expression were not incorporated in the final text.
“The adoption of the Resolution by consensus is a breakthrough. Especially so given the tensions and conflicts that have accompanied recent discussions on freedom of expression within the Human Rights Council and its predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights” comments Dr Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director.
The Resolution insists on the importance of freedom of expression, dialogues and debates, and the role of the media in combating racism, xenophobia and related intolerance. It includes specific paragraphs on the media and armed conflicts, and protection of journalists. Most importantly, the draft resolution omits reference to defamation of religion, a concept against which human rights activists had virulently campaigned.
Unfortunately however, the Resolution makes reference to “religious stereotyping”, a vague and difficult concept which suggests that religions, religious ideas and religious symbols (rather than believers) may be protected by international human rights law.
The Resolution also makes specific reference to another resolution against which human rights advocates around the world have advocated: HRC Resolution 7/36, which unnecessarily diluted the mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression.
“Unfortunately, the resolution does contain two viruses. It will be incumbent upon member states of the HRC and civil society to ensure that these viruses are not allowed to flourish, multiply and gangrene the text and commitments. Instead, they shall be contained, by and through international human rights standards and principles, so that the resolution can best function and offer the maximum protection to freedom of expression,” continues Dr Callamard.
***25.09.09. FELATRACS INDIGNADA POR CRÍMENES DE PERIODISTAS EN COLOMBIA Y MÉXICO
La Federación Latinoamericana de los Trabajadores de la Comunicación Social (FELATRACS), expresa su profunda indignación y repudio ante el cobarde asesinato de Diego Rojas Velásquez, reportero y camarógrafo colombiano de la cadena Supía TV, así como, de Norberto Miranda Madrid, más conocido como “El Gallito”, locutor y columnista mexicano de la estación local Radio Visión.
Rojas Velásquez, de 52 años de edad, fue cruelmente acribillado la noche el martes 22 de setiembre, a las 18:30 horas, en el municipio de aramanta, en Antioquía, departamento colombiano de Caldas, tras recibir na llamada telefónica que le informaba de una noticia de última hora. El reportero al trasladarse al lugar, fue abordado por desconocidos, quienes e dispararon cuatro tiros que acabaron con su vida.
El periodista radiofónico, Miranda Madrid, quien, además, publicaba en internet su columna ‘Cotorreando con el Gallito’, fue asesinado la noche del miércoles 23 de setiembre, a las 23:00 horas, en Casas Grandes, estado de Chihuahua. Tres sujetos encapuchados ingresaron violentamente a las oficinas de Radio Visión y dispararon al comunicador en presencia de sus compañeros. Miranda, había lanzado duras críticas por la ola de violencia que asola al estado de Chihuahua, donde se ubica la fronteriza Ciudad Juárez, considerada la zona más violenta del país.
La FELATRACS, en su férrea defensa y promoción de los derechos y libertades de los trabajadores de la comunicación social, ante estos nuevos crímenes, exige a las autoridades policiales y del Ministerio Público en Colombia y México, acciones inmediatas en la investigación para la claridad del móvil de los asesinatos, así como, para la identificación plena de los autores materiales y, de ser el caso, intelectuales, a fin de que sean procesados y sancionados conforme a ley.
La FELATRACS, rechaza, además, el nivel de impunidad existente en Colombia y México, pues, muchos de los asesinatos de periodistas (8 en México y 5 en Colombia, en lo que va del año) ocurridos en estos escenarios de alta peligrosidad para el ejercicio del periodismo, aún no han sido esclarecidos, mucho menos, están penados los culpables. La FELATRACS, demanda por tanto, que la impunidad no continué siendo escudo del crimen organizado, grupos armados y paramilitares, y de miembros de la función pública, quienes han hecho del cobarde ataque y la amenaza, su medio más eficaz para silenciar e intentar intimidar a los periodistas.
Estas son circunstancias difíciles para la familia periodística en la región, mayor dolor el de los deudos, a quienes les expresamos nuestras sentidas condolencias. Y queremos recordarles a las autoridades y a la colectividad en su conjunto que cuando se calla a un periodista, lo que se silencia es el derecho de los pueblos a estar informados.
***18.09.09. DR CONGO: UN DEPLORES DEATH THREATS AGAINST JOURNALISTS
New York, Sep 17 2009 1:10PM The United Nations mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) today denounced death threats against three journalists operating in the war-scarred country, warning that a free, diversified press is a prerequisite to the development of democracy.
“Death threats on journalists is an indication of a culture of impunity and intolerance likely to hamper efforts by the Congolese people toward a sustainable peace and sound democracy in their country,” the mission, known as MONUC, said in a statement, noting that three other reporters have already been murdered in the past two years.
“Ending impunity is the responsibility of the legitimate Government officials in place - nobody else. It is their duty and they are accountable before their people who have the legitimate right to demand access to reliable information which can only be made available by professional and responsible media.”
The three threatened journalists, all women - Delphie Namuto and Caddy Adzouba of Radio Okapi, a partnership between MONUC and the Swiss non-governmental Hirondelle Foundation, and Jolly Kamuntu of Radio Maendeleo – work in the South Kivu provincial capital of Bukavu in the DRC’s strife-torn east, where the other three journalists were murdered.
Secretary-General Ban-Ki moon’s Special Representative in DRC, Alain Doss, today met with South Kivu Governor Louis Mudherwa, who “shared in my worries and assured me of his personal commitment.
“I have been encouraged by his reaction and commitment by national authorities in this regard,” Mr. Doss added. “I would like somehow to call on the provincial and national judiciary officials to take the necessary actions to guarantee the safety of the journalists facing death threats to enable them to practice their profession without any obstacles,” he added.
Last month Bruno Koko Chirambiza, a journalist with Radio Star, was murdered in Bukavu. Didace Namujimbo and Serge Maheshe, both working for Radio Okapi, were killed in 2008 and 2007 respectively.
Mr. Doss said MONUC has always offered to assist the judiciary with specialized services and its experts. This offer is still available, he added, calling on the authorities to speed up the legal proceedings in the three murder cases “so that those who committed these heinous crimes are found and punished with the maximum severity the law allows.”
***09.09.09. IFJ Calls for Safety Review after Media Tragedy in Afghanistan (see also on page PRESS)
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today welcomed the rescue of a British journalist in Afghanistan but called for a safety review after his Afghan interpreter was killed in the military operation. According to reports from Afghanistan, Nato troops raided the place where Taliban militants were holding Stephen Farrell and Sultan Munadi in the Char Dara district at dawn on 9 September. Farrell was rescued but Sultan, 34, died in the fire fight between Nato soldiers and the militants. One Nato soldier and two civilians were also killed. "The good news of Stephen's successful rescue has been overshadowed by Sultan's tragic killing," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "It reminds us of the sacrifice that we all have to pay for media freedom." Stephen, the New York Times reporter, was kidnapped with Sultan last week as he was investigating the Nato air attack on two fuel tankers which had been hijacked by Taliban militants. Media reports say the air strike killed many people, including civilians. The IFJ says that journalists in Afghanistan should not be prevented from reporting independently, provided that they are confident about their personal safety and that of their local colleagues. "The killing of Sultan brings into sharp focus the issue of safety of local personnel who are employed by foreign media organisations in Afghanistan," added White. "We must ensure that, like all reporters, they are properly trained to work in dangerous conditions." The IFJ further calls on Nato leadership in Afghanistan to investigate the circumstances which led to Sultan's killing and engage with Afghan Association of Journalists on their safety needs. "There is no faulting the intentions behind the rescue operation," said White. "But if lessons can be learned for the future, an investigation and review of what happened here will be helpful."
***08.09.09. Violations of media freedoms in the Palestinian territories during August 2009 (Mada)
Violations of media freedoms in the Palestinian territories have increased last August, on the one hand the Israeli occupation authorities arrested the journalist writer Seri Sammour, prevented the journalist Sabrin Diab from entering the Al-Aqsa yards, confiscated the transmission equipment of Radio Bethlehem 2000 which resulted in the stopping of its broadcast, prevented two Swedish journalists from access to the Gaza Strip, and the settlers attacked the journalists Hasan At-Titi and Abd Al-Rahim Khabisah.
Meanwhile, the security forces in the Gaza Strip prevented journalists from covering Rafah events and tried to confiscate a cassette for Reuters on these events, detained Al-Ettejah Iraqi crew (the reporter Mazen Balbisi, cameraman Guevara Safadi and his assistant Abd Ar-Rahman Zaqqut) and damaged their tape. The Interior Ministry has also issued a statement against Al Arabiya television.
The security forces in the West Bank arrested the two journalists Mohammad Shtaiwi and Tareq Abu Zaid as well as columnist Esam Shawar in addition to the detention of Khaled Amayreh.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) welcomes the release of the journalists Hasan Rjoub on 16 / 8, Seri Al-Qodwa, on 19 / 8 and Isam Shawar on 31 / 8, it condemns the continued arrests of journalists by the Israeli occupation authorities and Palestinian security forces in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and calls for the release of all arrested journalists.
On the other hand, MADA Center denounce the campaign being waged by the Israeli authorities against the Swedish newspaper, Aftonbladet, after publication of a report by the journalist Donald Bostrom on the theft of Palestinian organs after being killed by Israeli army.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) expresses its condemnation of the closure of Radio Bethlehem 2000, and asks the international community to exert pressure on the government of Israel to return the confiscated broadcasting equipment, and to allow Swedish journalists to enter the Gaza Strip.
MADA expresses its concern over the intimidation facing a large group of journalists in the Gaza Strip, the last manifestation of which was the threat of death to three of them whom we had abstained to mention their names upon their request and for fear it will cause them further harassment and threats. Journalists have also been prevented from covering certain events in the Gaza Strip, the latest of which was the event of Rafah.
Details of violations:
(4 August) - Al-Ahram Weekly correspondent, Khalid Amayreh, was arrested by the Preventive Security Force in Bethlehem. Amayreh said, "I went to Bethlehem to cover Fatah Conference at about ten o'clock, members of the security held me at the entrance of the school at which the conference was held. They told me that I can’t enter because I did not get a special card from the Office of the President. I told them that none of the president's office contacted me in order to obtain a special card. They responded that this is not their business. When I was about to return to Hebron, one of the officials from the president's office voiced my name and asked to check the camera that I carry as well as my laptop. (He checked the pictures I have taken ... and I did not take more than one picture of the conference entrance). A few minutes later, members of the Preventive Security force attended and told me to accompany them in the car to the force’s headquarters in the city. After they took the personal details there, they told me that I am detained until the evening and that I am forbidden from entering Bethlehem for eight days. One of them said to me that I am being held because I don’t obtain a license to practice the profession, knowing that I have a license to practice signed by the former Minister of Information, Yasser Abed Rabbo.
At 3:00 pm, they allowed me to return to Hebron, but they handed me a summon to the Preventive Security headquarters in Hebron, where I went there on Sunday 9 August, one of the officials in the device blamed me and said (We'll break your legs if you go the Bethlehem during the Conference), and they set me free after five minutes.
(5 August) –columnist Esam Shawar was arrested by the Preventive Security Force in the city of Qalqilya (WB). Shawar said that one of Force’s officials had contacted him at evening and asked him about his location. He responded that he is in his parents’ house. He asked him to stay there until they arrive. They already arrived after short time, arrested him and took him to the headquarters of the Force in Qalqilya where he was simply investigated over some simple general cases and some articles written by him in the past, but he has not been charged. He was released on August 31. Shawar was arrested and called for investigation many times over the past few years by the Palestinian security Forces.
(7 August) - Reuters News Agency photographers, Hassan At-Titi and Abd Ar-Rahim Qusini were attacked yesterday afternoon in A’raq Burin village (Nablus) by Jewish settlers while they were covering the march for the people of the village to protest against attempts by settlers to take on hundreds of Dunoms (acres) of their land. At-Titi, who also works as a correspondent for Al Jazeera TV, said that he was covering a march of the people of the village when he was attacked by three settlers and one of them tried to grab his camera resulting in a slight injury to his right hand. One of the settlers attacked Al-Qusini, while one of the Israeli occupation soldiers attacked his assistant Ashraf Abu Shawish. The Israeli soldiers asked them to stay away from the scene. The settlers used to attack Palestinian citizens, their properties and journalists for several decades. Last October they attacked five photographers in the Hebron area.
(12 August) - The of Al-Ettejah Iraqi Channel crew (the reporter Mazen Balbisi, cameraman Guevara Safadi and his assistant Abd Ar-Rahman Zaqqut) was detained by the Palestinian police in the Gaza Strip. Balbisi said "At 11:00am We were preparing the conclusion of a TV report for Al-Ettejah Channel on political prisoners in the West Bank and Gaza Strip near Ansar junction where the police stop us and asked us to wait a bit until they contact their officer. Minutes later they gave us permission to film at this junction. After we completed filming, two members of the police inside Ansar prison approached us and asked us to go with them to the prison director, Colonel Sami Noufal, who asked the photographer, Guevara Safadi, to give him the cassette inside the camera. When we told him that there are very important materials in the cassette that we were working for two weeks to complete, he put the cassette under his feet and then gave it to some police members to destroy it. When we told him that we are in contact with the police media spokesman, Islam Shahwan, he said that he has no relation with Islam Shahwan. When we objected to the way they treated us, they confiscated the camera which we got back after a discussion, but he threatened us with arrest and confiscation of all equipment and refused to hear any objection from us under threat and spoke to us in a non-decent way.
(14 August) – the journalists were prevented from covering the armed clashes between police and the supporters of Jund Ansar Allah group at Ibn Taimeyah mosque and the surrounding area in the city of Rafah. The Interior Ministry of the dissolved government prohibited filming the events or access to hospitals by declaring the city of Rafah and the hospitals as closed areas to media and journalists. France Press photographer, Said Al-Khatib, said that he and a number of photographers were prevented from filming after the outbreak of the clashes on Friday 14 august and the next two days in the area of Ibn Taimeya Mosque and they have been told that the situation there is danger.
(14 August) - Trying to confiscate a cassette from Reuter’s news agency office in Gaza City by the security forces. A group of security forces arrived to the agency's office after the publication of the speech of Abd Al-Latif Mousa announcing the establishment of the Islamic Emirate and filming the first clashes that followed. They asked for receiving the tape, but the staff told them that the Agency's policy does not allow it, so they left the headquarters.
(15 August) –A statement was issued by the Ministry of Interior of the dissolved Government in the Gaza Strip in which it accused Al Arabiya television of broadcasting a report on the events of Rafah area, full of lies and slanders and harms the Palestinian resistance, Al-Arabiya television has been subjected to accusations and campaigns by supporters of Hamas Movement, whereas it sometimes accused of being biased to Fatah and at other times to America and Israel. Its office in Gaza City had been exploded on 22/1/2007.
(20 August) - The journalist Sabrin Mohammad Diab was prevented from entering al-Aqsa mosque yards in Jerusalem by the Israeli police. Diab, who was preparing a report for "Al-Arabi An-Naseri," Cairo based newspaper, said: "When I tried to enter the Old City I was stopped by a number of occupation soldiers at Al-Asbat Gate and they asked for inspecting my bag and asked me not to film, because it is prohibited. I told them that I am in work mission and I will shoot some pictures in the markets. They took my camera fiercely and I was worried about some important pictures that did not move them from the camera, so I asked the officer whether he will return the camera to me. He bluntly said that I will get it back when I come out of the same point and he set a number on the camera and my hand. I continued walking until I reached the entrance of the Haram (Al-Aqsa) where two policemen stopped me and asked me for my ID card, although they saw the soldiers searched my bag and checked my ID and press cards. Then they rudely said (No entry). I asked about the reason and they said that entry is prohibited for women under the age of forty –fifth. I showed them my press card and told them that I am in a work mission and that the military permitted me to enter. They said that they have nothing to do with the army and that they are policemen who enforce the law. Then I went back to the market where I met a Belgian tourist and asked her to take some pictures in the market for me. She welcomed the idea after I explained to her what happened with me. While we were standing alongside one of the stalls, three policemen attended by and asked the tourist with a smile and quietly accepting the apology for the inconvenience I caused to her and asked her to continue her tour in the market. I told them that did not bother her and that taking the pictures based on willing and conviction. Then she turned to me and said in English: "I'm sorry, I wish you success," and then went. The policemen then dismissed me from the market and threatened to arrest me if I don’t obey the instructions of the police, so I went to get my camera back and I left the area.”
The occupation authorities prevent Palestinian journalists from filming inside Al-Aqsa Mosque and forbid Muslim men under the age of fifty years and women younger than forty-five years of access to it during the month of Ramadan.
(23 August) – The reporter and photographer of Aftonbladet Newspaper in Israel were prevented from entering the Gaza Strip, where they have been told by the Government Press Office that they should wait for three months, according to Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot. This comes after the newspaper published a report written by the journalist Donald Bostrom on the Israeli theft of organs of Palestinians killed by the Israeli army.
(25 August) – Radio Bethlehem 2000 broadcasting equipments were confiscated by the Israeli occupation forces in the town of Beit Jala southern Bethlehem. Station manager, George Qanawati, said that a troop of the Israeli army composed of five vehicles raided the broadcasting headquarters in Beit Jala at about six in the evening and asked the technician to disconnect the equipment (two transmitters) and confiscated them telling him not to try to re-broadcast "because we do not like to lessen to Bethlehem 2000", and it will be bombed if it re-broadcast. The radio station headquarters, which is located in the town of Beit Sahour and founded in 1996, was halted broadcasting.
(27 August) - Aqsa TV former reporter Tariq Abd Ar- Razzak Abu Zeid was arrested by the Palestinian intelligence force in the city of Jenin. His father said that Tariq was wanted by the Palestinian security forces seven months ago, where they attended to the house six times looking for him, and recently it was agreed with them to extradite him to them provided that he will not stay more than five days in prison. His father believes that the reason of chasing his son is back to the belief that he is still working with Aqsa TV. "They did not abide by the agreement and he is still under detention”. The government of Dr. Salam Fayyad has banned the work of Al-Aqsa TV in September 2007.
(30 August) – Mohammad Shtaiwi, Director of Aqsa Channel Office in the West Bank, was arrested by the Palestinian intelligence force. Shtaiwi, who lives in the city of Tulkarem (WB), said that Palestinian intelligence force has summoned him to its headquarters in Ramallah, where they arrested him. Few minutes after his arrival to the headquarters, they tied his hands and put the bag on his head pushing his head against the wall which resulted in falling down on the ground. Then they stopped him on his legs and tied him. Later they brought a doctor to examine him who seems to be recommended not to expose him to torture, which was stopped after that.(He was released on 2 September) . Shtaiwi has been harassed and detained several times by Palestinian security forces.
(31 August) – The journalist writer Seri Sammour was arrested by the occupation forces in the city of Jenin (WB). His wife said that an occupation army force raided their home at 2:30 am; they searched the house and confiscated the computer, laptop and three mobiles, then arrested Sammour to an unknown location. Sammour was arrested last month by the Palestinian Security Forces on July 20 and released on 11 august. Contact: Mousa Rimawi info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com www.madacenter.org
***03.09.09. SALVADOR. Filmmaker who documented Salvadoran gang violence murdered
The bullet-ridden body of journalist Christian Poveda, whose new documentary on a violent Salvadoran street gang was scheduled for wide release this month, was discovered Wednesday afternoon just north of the capital, San Salvador, according to local and international press reports. The Committee to Protect Journalists today called on Salvadoran authorities to thoroughly investigate the slaying.
Salvadoran police found Poveda's body sprawled near his car on an isolated road in the town of Tonacatepeque, about 10 miles (15 kilometers) from the capital, according to local and international press reports. He had been shot in the face at least four times at close range. Witnesses told local reporters that they called police after hearing several gunshots. Authorities found an audio recorder and Poveda's press credentials at the scene, local press reports said.
Poveda, a 52-year-old Frenchman of Spanish descent, had documented violence in El Salvador as a filmmaker and photojournalist over the course of three decades. Throughout 2008, he worked on a highly anticipated documentary about one of the country's most violent gangs, Mara 18. During the filming of the documentary, Poveda lived with gang members for 18 months. Local press reports said Poveda had received death threats from angry gang members.
The documentary, "La Vida Loca," had already been screened at international film festivals and was scheduled for wide release on September 30. It showed brutal killings, rites of initiation, and the judicial system's ineffectiveness in combating gangs.
Tonacatepeque is controlled by Mara 18, local press reports said. At the time of the murder, Poveda was reportedly traveling from nearby La Campanera, a town controlled by Mara 18's main rival, Mara Salvatrucha. Confrontations between the two gangs have been extremely violent, Salvadoran press reports said.
Local authorities are investigating Poveda's killing, national police spokesman Hugo Ramírez told the local news Web site http://www.elfaro.net . According to press reports, authorities are investigating Poveda's documentary work as a possible motive. Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes issued a statement Wednesday condemning Poveda's killing and calling for an end to street violence.
"This brutal murder sends a chilling message to journalists in El Salvador, where rampant gang-related violence is the most sensitive issue for the press," said Carlos Lauría, CPJ's senior program coordinator for the Americas. "Salvadoran authorities must ensure that this crime does not go unpunished."
A CPJ analysis published earlier this year found that journalists covering gang violence in El Salvador and other parts of Latin America had become targets themselves. Gang violence has become widespread in El Salvador, especially in the poor neighborhoods outside San Salvador, the analysis noted. Salvadoran journalists told CPJ that security concerns prevent in-depth reporting on the origins and causes of gang violence.
***02.09.09. SRI LANKA. Tamil journalist sentenced to 20 years of hard labour
Popular Tamil journalist J.S. Tissainayagam has been sentenced to 20 years hard labour on charges of supporting terrorism and inciting racial hatred, becoming the first journalist to be convicted under Sri Lanka's draconian anti-terrorism law, report Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and other IFEX members.
An English-language columnist for the Sri Lankan "Sunday Times" and editor of the news website OutreachSL, Tissainayagam was arrested on 7 March 2008.
He spent five months in prison without charge before his indictment in August 2008 for promoting terrorism through the magazine "Northeastern Monthly", which he briefly published in 2006. The magazine criticised the government's role in the war against the Tamil Tiger rebels and accused authorities of withholding food and other essential items from Tamil-majority areas.
On 31 August, a High Court judge ruled that Tissainayagam's articles violated the law because they were aimed at creating "communal disharmony."
The court also found that he had received money from the LTTE to fund his website, but RSF has established that the site was funded by a German aid project.
"The imposition of this extremely severe sentence on Tissainayagam suggests that some Sri Lanka judges confuse justice with revenge," RSF said. "With the help of confessions extracted by force and information that was false or distorted, the court has used an anti-terrorism law that was intended for terrorists, not for journalists and human rights activists."
According to the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), which has been campaigning tirelessly for his release, Tissainayagam was repeatedly tortured and denied medical treatment while in prison.
Despite the end of the war, the Sri Lankan state continues to attack journalists who do not support its policies.
According to the International Press Institute (IPI), 12 journalists have been killed in Sri Lanka since 2006, and many others have been harassed, threatened and arrested. RSF has reported that Sri Lanka is one of the worst-hit countries in the world when it comes to the kidnap, arrest and disappearance of journalists.
CPJ announced that it will honour Tissainayagam with a 2009 International Press Freedom Award. Meanwhile, the Globe Media Forum and RSF report that Tissainayagam will be the first winner of the Peter Mackler Prize, "a newly created award for journalists who display great courage and professional integrity in countries where press freedom is not respected."
***31.08.09. IFJ Welcomes End to US Media Vetting in Afghanistan
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and United States journalists' groups today welcomed a decision by the United States army to abandon vetting of journalists covering the Afghanistan conflict to see if they are sympathetic to the American cause. The Reuters news agency has reported that the United States army is cancelling a contract with a public relations firm after coming under criticism for using the company to provide profiles of journalists and rating their reporting on the Afghanistan war according to whether it was "positive", "neutral" or "negative". The IFJ and its affiliates in the United States, the American Federation of Radio and Television Artists (AFTRA) and The Newspaper Guild-CWA(TNG), last week criticised a $1.5 million contract for The Rendon Group, a controversial public relations firm, hired to screen journalists applying to be embedded with US troops in Afghanistan. Now the contract first revealed last week in the military's own Pentagon-funded but editorially independent newspaper, Stars and Stripes, is to be scrapped. The paper said the profiles included suggestions on how to "neutralise" negative stories and generate favourable coverage. Although US commanders denied they used the profiles to discriminate against journalists, the IFJ General Secretary Aidan White roundly condemned the process saying: "It suggests the army is more interested in propaganda than honest reporting". Welcoming the latest move, the IFJ says the army should focus on helping journalists to cover the war without further interference. "This is a small victory for press freedom and quality journalism," said White. "It underscores the importance of avoiding any suggestion of undue influence on the way media report and it is a sound message to send in Afghanistan where the battle for democracy is not yet won."
***24.08.09. SOMALIA. Anniversary of abduction of Canadian and Australian journalists
Two foreign freelance journalists are about to complete a year in captivity. Canadian reporter Amanda Lindhout and Australian photographer Nigel Brennan were taken hostage by an armed group as they were returning to Mogadishu from Afgoye refugee camp, 20 km west of the Somali capital, on 23 August 2008.
“We are very worried about these two hostages, given the length of their ordeal and the extreme dangers prevailing in Somalia,” Reporters Without Borders said. “We reiterate our support for their families and we hope they will be released without delay.”
At the time of their abduction, Lindhout and Brennan were being accompanied by Abdifatah Mohammed Elmi, a Somali freelance journalist who was their fixer and interpreter, and two Somali drivers, Mahad Isse and Marwali.
Elmi and the two drivers were released on the night of 15 January, after being held for 177 days. Elmi said he was separated from Lindhout and Brennan immediately after their capture.
A woman claiming to be Lindhout called CTV headquarters in Toronto on 10 June and appealed to the Canadian government to do everything possible to obtain her release. In tears, she said she was being held in appalling conditions.
“I’m being kept in a dark, windowless room in chains without any clean drinking water and very little food or no food,” the caller said. “I’ve been very sick for months without any medicine.” A similar call was made to OMNI Television, another Canadian TV station, at the end of July.
The kidnappers have been demanding a ransom, the size of which has changed over the months. Rumours have circulated about the hostages but Reporters Without Borders has been unable to confirm any of them. According to one rumour, Lindhout was pregnant and several Somali sources have said in the past two months that she gave birth to a boy.
Here is the statement of both families :
"Together, the two families continue to work tirelessly to secure Nigel’s and Amanda’s safe release. With little outside support, the families, who have been united as one throughout this horrendous ordeal, continue to do everything and anything to gain the earliest possible release for their loved ones Amanda and Nigel. Our thoughts and all our love are with Amanda and Nigel, today, just as they have been for the past 365 days, and just as they will be until they are safely home with us.
In issuing this brief joint statement the families hope that the media will respect their wishes to be left alone during this particularly emotional time.”
***14.08.09. FEPALC CONDENA VIOLENCIA CONTRA PERIODISTAS EN VENEZUELA: SITUACIÓN ES INSOSTENIBLE
La Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (FEPALC) condena enérgicamente los actos de violencia contra los periodistas venezolanos y expresa su profunda preocupación por el inminente deterioro de la libertad de expresión en ese país.
El ataque físico, con palos y objetos contundentes, a 12 periodistas de los diarios Ultimas Noticias, El Mundo y Líder, de la cadena Capriles, durante una movilización en defensa de la libertad de expresión el último 13 de agosto, no hace más que develar la intolerancia reinante entre los sectores afines al gobierno que ven en la fuerza la única arma para silenciar las voces críticas a la acción gubernamental.
A la medida que clausuró 34 radioemisoras, mediante el artilugio de revocatoria de licencia aduciendo razones técnicas- le siguió el proyecto de ley de los autodenominados “delitos mediáticos”, el ataque a la sede de Globovisión, y se le suma este nuevo acto de violencia física que ha consternado al gremio de los periodistas venezolanos. La disminución del número de medios de expresión, que no es otra cosa que la violación del derecho ciudadano a recibir información procedente de diversas fuentes, preocupa de sobremanera a una organización como la nuestra.
La FEPALC expresa su solidaridad a los periodistas Marco Ruiz, Jesús Hurtado, Uvaldo Arrieta, Octavio Hernández, Manuel Alejandro Álvarez, Gabriel Irribaren, Fernando Peñalver, Mario Rondón, Greasy Bolaños, Gleixys Patrán, César Batiz y Sergio Moreno, varios de ellos trasladados a centros hospitalarios de Caracas a consecuencia de la feroz agresión de la que fueron víctimas.
Para la FEPALC el gobierno venezolano es responsable de cautelar la integridad física de los periodistas y garantizar condiciones para el ejercicio de su labor. EN razón a ello le recuerda al Estado venezolano, en su conjunto, que sin pluralismo en los medios informativos, sin reales garantías para el ejercicio periodístico y sin un marco legal afín a los estándares internacionales no puede haber libertad de expresión ni democracia.
La FEPALC se declara, a partir de la fecha, en alerta permanente y seguirá, cerca al Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa, su organización afiliada en Venezuela, lo que acontece en ese hermano país con los periodistas, los medios y el principio de libertad de expresión vapuleado por estas acciones y las registradas en las últimas semanas.
13 de agosto del 2009 Celso Schroder Presidente FEPALC Zuliana Lainez Secretaria de Derechos Humanos FEPALC
***12.08.09. AFGHANISTAN. Two AP journalists badly injured by roadside bomb near Kandahar
Reporters Without Borders’s concern about the growing dangers for journalists in the run-up to the 20 August presidential election has been heightened by the news that two foreign journalists embedded with the US military were seriously injured by a roadside bomb today near the southern city of Kandahar.
“What happened today is very regrettable and our thoughts go out to the families of the injured journalists,” Reporters Without Borders said. “The mounting violence will result in restrictions on the quantity and quality of news coverage. The Afghan authorities and all parties to the conflict should ensure that respect for media freedom is a priority.”
Spanish photographer Emilio Morenatti and Indonesian cameraman Andi Jatmiko, both employees of the US news agency, the Associated Press, were travelling with a US military convoy when their vehicle was hit by roadside bomb. The AP said Jatmiko sustained leg and rib injuries while Morenatti sustained such severe leg injuries that a foot had to be amputated.
The situation in Afghanistan is worsening steadily for journalists, who are either the direct target of press freedom violations (see the report on our fact-finding visit) or fall victim to the mounting violence. When working on their own, they are targeted by the Taliban or criminal groups but they are just as vulnerable when embedded with the NATO military forces.
According to an independent NGO, the number of incidents involving IEDs (improvised explosive devices) increased to 828 in July. Ordinary civilians make up the bulk of the victims of the fighting, but a total of 17 journalists were reportedly killed since 2001.
***30.07.09 FEPALC CONDENA ASESINATO DE PERIODISTA EN MÉXICO Y HACE LLAMADO ENÉRGICO PARA QUE NO QUEDE IMPUNE
La Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (FEPALC) hace un llamado enérgico a las autoridades de justicia en México para que el crimen del periodista radial Juan Daniel Martínez Gil, asesinado el 28 de julio último, no quede impune. Con igual energía demandó se implementen, de una vez por todas, mecanismos adecuados para proteger a los periodistas.
Martínez Gil, periodista de W Radio y de Radiorama Acapulco, fue hallado muerto en el estado de Guerrero, México. El cadáver de Martínez Gil estaba semienterrado, presentaba señales de golpes por diferentes partes del cuerpo y tenía el rostro cubierto con cinta adhesiva.
La FEPALC, al demandar una inmediata investigación que permita identificar los móviles del crimen, recuerda que México es en la actualidad el país más peligroso para el ejercicio del periodismo. Esta situación se acentúa por el grado de impunidad garantizada a los victimarios. A la fecha en el 96% de los casos de crímenes contra periodistas no se ha hecho justicia.
Martínez Gil es el sétimo periodista asesinado en México en el 2009. Le antecedieron el periodista Ernesto Montañez Valdivia (14 de julio), Martín Miranda Avilés (12 de julio), Eliseo Barrón Hernández (26 de mayo), Carlos Ortega Melo Samper (3 de mayo), Paul Ibarra Ramírez (13 de enero) y Daniel Méndez Hernández (23 de febrero).
La FEPALC, consternada por este nuevo crimen contra un comunicador en México, expresa su incondicional respaldo al Sindicato Nacional de Redactores de la Prensa (SNRP), su organización afiliada, y ratifica junto a ella su voluntad de no cesar en la lucha por la justicia en este y anteriores asesinatos contra periodistas mexicanos.
30 de julio del 2009 Celso Schroder Presidente FEPALC Zuliana Lainez Secretaria de Derechos Humanos FEPALC
FEDERACIÓN DE PERIODISTAS DE AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE (FEPALC) Federación Argentina de Trabajadores de Prensa (FATPREN); Federación Nacional de Periodistas (FENAJ); Sindicato Nacional de Periodistas de Costa Rica (SNP); Federación Colombiana de Periodistas (FECOLPER); Federación Nacional de Trabajadores de los Medios de Comunicación Social de Chile (FENATRAMCO); Sindicato de Periodistas y Similares de El Salvador (SINPESS); Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Industria de la Prensa y Similares de Honduras (SITINPRES); Sindicato Nacional de Redactores de Prensa de México (SNRP); Sindicato de Periodistas del Paraguay (SPP); Asociación Nacional de Periodistas del Perú (ANP); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa de la República Dominicana (SNTP); Asociación de Prensa Uruguaya (APU); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Prensa de Venezuela (SNTP).
***21.07.09. RUSSIA. HR/09/121: UN EXPERTS READY TO ASSIST RUSSIA IN INVESTIGATING SERIES OF KILLINGS OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS
HR/09/121 21 July 2009
GENEVA – Seven UN human rights experts* reiterate their request to the Russian authorities to extend an invitation to visit the country to assist the authorities in conducting an independent investigation into a series of killings of human rights defenders, lawyers and journalists in recent years, many of them related to the human rights situation in Chechnya and other Republics of the North Caucasus, including the latest killing of Natalia Estemirova.
The experts acknowledged the expressions of outrage and assurances by the Russian leadership that all necessary steps will be taken to apprehend and punish Estemirova’s killers. “However, these assurances will be worth little unless the authorities take steps that go beyond what has been done in the past, which has all too often led to a cycle of impunity”, a group of UN independent human rights experts said today in a joint statement.
“We offer our assistance to the Russian authorities in light of the failure to effectively and impartially investigate the killings and attacks on a number of human rights defenders in recent years and to prosecute and bring the perpetrators to justice”, said the experts. “This would break the cycle of prevailing impunity surrounding the killings of other high profile human rights defenders and contribute to the prevention of further violence and harassment against human rights defenders”,” they added.
The independent experts also reminded that “the Government of the Russian Federation has a prime responsibility under international human rights instruments to ensure the protection of human rights defenders against any violence, threats, retaliation, pressure or any other arbitrary action as a result of their human rights work.”
Natalia Estemirova, a member of the Russian NGO Memorial, was found murdered on 15 July 2009. She had been abducted from her home in Grozny and bundled into a car. Her body was later found in woodland in neighbouring Ingushetia with two bullet wounds to the head and chest.
As a researcher with Memorial she had tirelessly documented cases of abductions, torture, enforced disappearances and unlawful killings allegedly committed by government-backed militias in the Chechen Republic.
(*) The Special Procedures mandate holders are Philip Alston, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; Manfred Nowak, Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; Margaret Sekaggya, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; Leandro Despouy, Special Rappporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; Yakin Ertürk, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences; and Santiago Corcuera Cabezut, Chairperson-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances.
For more information on the mandate and work of the Special Rapporteurs, please visit: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/index.htm
For further queries on the Special Rapporteurs’ Joint Statement, please contact: Orlagh McCann (Tel.: +41 (0)22 917 9738 / omccann@ohchr.org)
***16.07.09. UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS CHIEF URGES “TRANSPARENT AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF ESTEMIROVA KILLING”
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, today urged the Russian authorities to conduct a “thorough, transparent and independent investigation into the kidnapping and shooting of Russian human rights activist Natalia Estemirova”.
Welcoming the announcement that a top-level investigation has been ordered by Russian President Dimitry Medvedev, the United Nations Human Rights chief urged the authorities “to do all they can to ensure that the perpetrators are prosecuted and brought to justice.”
Ms. Estemirova, a prominent human rights activist who had been investigating alleged human rights abuses in Chechnya for the prominent Russian non-governmental organization, Memorial, was kidnapped on Wednesday near her home in the Chechen capital of Grozny. Her body was found later in the day in neighbouring Ingushetia with bullet wounds to the head and chest.
“This case sadly underlines once again the need for Governments to do much more to protect human rights defenders”, said Ms. Pillay, noting that the work of human rights defenders in Russia, in particular in the North Caucasus, is precarious. Ms. Estemirova’s death is the latest in a series of killings or attacks against human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers in the country.
Natalia Estemirova had worked with dedication for many years to promote human rights in the North Caucasus. She was awarded the Anna Politkovskaya Prize from the Nobel Women's Initiative and received several other awards, including from the Swedish and European parliaments.
In the past, Ms. Estemirova had worked with the activists Anna Politkovskaya, who was shot dead in 2006, and Stanislav Markelov, who was murdered in January this year.
***14.07.09. Albanian journalist BESAR LIKMETA wins the CEI SEEMO Award for Outstanding Merits in Investigative Journalism
Trieste/ Vienna, 14 July 2009
The Central European Initiative (CEI) and the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) are pleased to announce that the young investigative journalist Besar Likmeta from Albania is the winner of the CEI/SEEMO Award for Outstanding Merits in Investigative Journalism.
On 29 June 2009, the International Jury met in Trieste, at the CEI Headquarters. The Jury was composed of Mr. Norbert Mappes Niediek, free-lance South East Europe correspondent based in Graz (Austria); Ms. Franca Roiatti, deputy editor, foreign affairs desk, Panorama weekly, Milan (Italy); Ms. Marina Constantinoiu, editor-in-chief, Jurnalul National daily, Bucharest (Romania); Mr. Milorad Ivanovic, deputy editor-in-chief, Blic daily, Belgrade (Serbia); Ms. Angelina Soldatenko, director of the International Institute for Regional Media and Information, Kharkiv (Ukraine).
The meeting was also attended by Mr. Hari Stajner (Serbia), CEI expert in media issues, acting as advisor together with Mr. Oliver Vujovic (SEEMO Secretary General), Amb. Pietro Ercole Ago (CEI-ES Secretary General) and Ms. Barbara Fabro (CEI-ES Senior Executive Officer).
The Jury examined a total of 26 nominations from 12 CEI Member States. The personal risks taken while performing the duty, the quality of reporting as well as the impact on society of the message conveyed were the main criteria taken into account by the Jury.
It was unanimously decided that the Award should go to Besar Likmeta, young investigative journalist from Albania. With this selection, the Jury intended to "promote the good investigative journalism carried out by a very young journalist and, more in general, to convey a signal of support to the development of investigative journalism in Albania, which is particularly significant for this country". Besar Likmeta will receive the Award of 5.000 EUR, offered by the CEI Executive Secretariat, on the occasion of the traditional "CEI Journalists Forum", to be held in Warsaw, Poland, in September 2009.
Besar Likmeta, born in Durres in 1983, is currently editor and project manager of the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN). Likmeta investigative work has streched from fake degrees to consumer protection and fraud by large state corporations. In 2008-2009, Limkmeta has produced several significant investigative reports that were widely republished and have made an impact in the Albanian society as well as regionally: "Albania Ignores Trade in Fake Degrees", "Wind Farm Threatens Albanian Paradise", "World Bank Demolished Albania Village"
Likmeta has worked as professional journalist for various print publications, electronic media and television. He started his career reporting for the Florida Times Union in Jacksonville, Florida. He moved to Albania in 2005 where he has been a features editor for the Tirana Times, a world news editor for the 24 hour news channel, TV Ora news, and lately as BIRN Albania editor. He has also contributed stories to various publications such as Jane's Intelligence Review, Businessweek and World Politics Review.
Moreover, the Jury decided to award a special mention to Esad Hecimovic from Bosnia and Herzegovina and to Stefan Candea from Romania, in recognition of their valuable contribution to investigative journalism. For that, they will receive a CEI SEEMO diploma during the "CEI Journalists Forum".
***13.07.09. IRAN. IFJ Condemns Latest Clampdown on Journalists
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today expressed deep concern over continuing harassment of media in Iran amid signs of growing opposition from independent journalists to censorship and manipulation in the country's mainstream media.
"There is evidence of strong pressure on independent journalism from outside and inside the newsroom. Even some media owners inside the profession are bullying their journalists who refuse to toe the official line," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "Journalists are arrested, sacked or forced to resign for standing up for ethical journalism."
According to the Association of Iranian Journalists (AoIJ), an IFJ affiliate, 39 journalists and media workers have been sacked or forced to resign from the conservative news agency Fars News, a number of them in recent weeks following clashes with management over the agency's editorial line.
The IFJ recently denounced the Iranian government's attempts to control and manipulate the content and the flow of information from international news outlets following the country's disputed presidential elections last month which sparked unprecedented levels of civil unrest.
The IFJ has also learned about three latest arrests of journalists in Iran: Mohammad-Reza Yazdanpanah, a journalist and blogger was arrested on July 8 in Tehran. Madjid Saeidi, a photo journalist who has worked for conservative journals for the last five years was arrested on 10 July in Tehran while Mehdi Mahdavi-Azad, editor of Shahab news, a reformist daily, was arrested on June 23.
"These latest arrests are yet more stains on Iran's already poor record on press freedom," added White. "The clampdown on media is a reflection of the perilous situation for democracy in the country."
***07.07.09. Violations of media freedoms in oPt during June 2009 The Palestinian territories witnessed an escalation in violations of media freedoms during last June
The last June has witnessed an escalation in violations of media freedoms in the occupied Palestinian territories compared to the previous month, where the district court in Jerusalem sentenced Al-Alalam TV correspondent, Khader Shahin, and producer, Mohammed Sarhan, for two months imprisonment. The occupation soldiers have also attacked the photographer journalists Nayef Al-Hashlamoun and his brothers, Najeh and Abd Al-Hafiz, Hazem Bader, Iyad Hamad, Yosri Al- Jamal and his assistant Maa’moun Wazwaz.
The Palestinian security forces in the West Bank have arrested the journalists: Awad Rjoub, Dr. Farid Abu Dhair, and Alaa’ Altiti, Qays Abu Samrah, Younis Hasasneh and the journalist writer Seri Sammour. They have, moreover, stopped Al-Jazeera Television staff (Wael Shioukhi, Zeiad Al-Aqrat and Mohammad Salameh) and deleted the material from the camera. The security forces in Gaza have also arrested Seri Qudwah and attacked Mohammad Mashharawi.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) expresses its deep concern for the ongoing arrests of journalists and writers by the Palestinian security forces in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and the continued detention of a number of other journalists in their prisons who were arrested in the past months (Iyad Srour, Mustafa Sabri, Murad Abu Al-Bahaa’). MADA also denounce the rejection by the Preventive Security force to release the journalist Mustafa Sabri, despite the decision issued by the Supreme Court of Justice to release him.
MADA expresses condemnation of all violations committed by Israeli occupation forces and the Palestinian security forces against the Palestinian journalists, which is a rude violation of the freedom of opinion and expression, and so MADA asks for stopping the attacks against journalists and releasing the arrested ones.
Details of violations:
(1 June) - Aljazeera Net correspondent Awad Rjoub was arrested by the Palestinian Military Intelligence Force. Rajoub said that he received a phone call from the mentioned force asking him to come to their headquarters in Hebron. He went there at around 12:00 pm, where they asked him to hand over his personal possessions and to sign an arrest warrant, and then they started to investigate him for an interview he made with one of Hamas leaders to be included in a report to Al-Jazeera Net. He was released at 4:00pm of the same day. Rajoub was arrested by the Preventive Security Force on 29 July 2008 and released a month later.
(2 June) - Iqra’s TV correspondent, Younes Ibrahim Hasasneh (31 years old), was arrested by the Palestinian Preventive Security Force. His wife reported that a force from the above mentioned Force raided their house in the town of AlShioukh (Hebron) at about 3:30 pm and asked him to accompany them to their headquarters in Hebron to be asked a few questions and then return home the same day. Twenty six days after arrest, his wife has visited him whereas he told her that he was tortured the first five days of his arrest and then transferred to regular rooms, and he was questioned about the nature of his journalistic work , but with no charges. Hasasneh was arrested by the Palestinian Intelligence Force on 3 November 2008 and released six days later.
(10 June) - Quds Television correspondent Mohamed Zuhdi Mashharawi (23 years old) was attacked, by the Palestinian police in the Gaza city. Mashharawi said that he was covering the visit of a Qatari delegation to Alshifa Hospital in Gaza city at about 12:00 pm when he was informed by the hospital administration that the coverage of the visit is limited to one television channel. There was a discussion between him and the hospital administration on this issue and then the police of the hospital security intervened and told him that photographing is prohibited. There was a debate with them since this is not their competence. They attacked him by beating and detained him for one hour at the hospital security room. Later he protested to the Police Department, which has promised to investigate the incident. At night, they apologized to him and stressed that the attack was a personal decision.
(10 June) –Alnajah Press Office Director, Dr. Abd Al-Fattah Abu Dhair (47 years old) who is a lecturer at the media section at Alnajah University, was arrested by the Palestinian Intelligence Force in Nablus city. His wife said that the security force surrounded their house about 3:00 pm and knocked the door. When she opened they asked about her husband. She told them that he is inside, and then they asked her to call him to come. During this time his son, Baraa’ was returning home. When he asked about the situation, they attacked him and detained him in one of their car. Afterwards they have arrested Dr. Abu Dhair and released his son. Abu Dhair reported, after his release on June 15th, that he was interrogated for his journalistic work and the office ownership.
(14 June) – Alalam Television correspondent, Khader Shahin and the producer, Mohammad Sarhan, were sentenced by the district Court in Jerusalem. The Director of Alalam Office in the West Bank, Fares Sarafandi, reported that the court sentenced Shahin and Sarhan for two months imprisonment and six months imprisonment with a stay of execution, but the their defense attorney appealed against the court decision to the Israeli Court of Justice whereas they will remain under house arrest until pending the appeal. The Israeli occupation authorities have arrested Shahin and Sarhan, on 5 last January under the pretext of publishing information on the movements of the Israeli occupation army prior to the ground war in the Gaza Strip, at the beginning of this year, and released them on the fifteenth of the same month on bail, and imposed house arrest on them since that time, and prevented them from journalistic work based on the district Court decision. The same court had overturned the decision of imposing house arrest on them on the twenty-second of June.
(15 June) - Aljazeera Television correspondent Wael Ash-Shioukhi, cameraman Zeyad Al-Aqrat and his assistant Mohammed Salameh were stopped by a barrier of the Palestinian Preventive Security on the entrance to the town of Dura. Ash-Shioukhi reported that they were returning from the village of Beit Ar-Roush after preparing a report on the death of Haitham -Amr, who had been detained at the prison of the Palestinian Intelligence Force, when they were stopped by members of the Force who confiscated their cameras and equipment and asked them to receive them from the Force headquarters in the city of Hebron as a routine procedure. The staff actually went there and waited for about an hour and a half to meet the Director who returned the camera and equipment to them, where it was found that that the intelligence erased the filmed material.
(15 June) - The rejection of releasing freelance journalist, Mustafa Sabri, by the Palestinian Preventive Security Force. His wife said that the Supreme Court of Justice issued a decision to release Sabri on 15 June, but he is still detained so far and she still unable to visit him at the Preventive Security prison in Beitunia town near Ramallah. Sabri was arrested on 21/4/2009 and before that he was arrested several times by the Palestinian security forces.
(19 June) - Palestine Website for Media and Information Network was penetrated by Israeli hackers. The Network General Supervisor, Azmi Shioukhi said that the ten news sites of the network were penetrated and all the material contained in these sites were deleted, but the technical staff was able to regain control of the sites after two days and re-publish the material that was deleted from the WebPages except for "Palestine Sport" and materials that have been published in the period between 30 April -1 June2009. He stressed that the reason for targeting and destruction of the web site is the desire to withhold the fact of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories.
(20 June) - Journalist writer, Abd Al-Fattah Seri Sammour (35 years old), was arrested by the Palestinian Military Intelligence service. His wife said that her husband had been arrested when he was summoned through telephone to the headquarters of the above mentioned force in the city of Jenin. His wife believes that the arrest came as a result of his articles published by a number of news sites, such as Al-Haqaeq and the Arab Times in addition to his blog, but with no charge.
(23 June) - The Jordanian “alhaqiqa aldawliya" Newspaper correspondent, Qays Abu Samrah was arrested, by the Palestinian Preventive Security Force. His wife said that Abu Samrah received a summon by the Intelligence Force for the next morning, however, members of the Preventive Security Force came to his house in the village of Sennirya (Qalqilya-West Bank) at approximately 12:15am, and have searched it and confiscated his computer and then arrested him. Abu Samrah had been arrested on the twenty-second of last February by the same force and was released after two days of detention.
(23 June) - Alsabah Newspaper Site editor Seri Mohammad Qudwah (42 years old) from his home in Gaza city by the security forces. His wife said that a group of security forces in uniform and civil dress knocked at the door of their home about 01:00 am, her husband opened the door to them, and then they searched the house, confiscated two laptop, computer and fax, in addition to his mobile phone, and then arrested him.
(23 June) - The trial of journalist Alaa’ Altiti in the Magistrate's Court was resumed in the city of Hebron. Altiti said that the list of charges against him included working for Aqsa Television which belongs to Hamas Movement and sedition. The trial has been postponed to the thirtieth of next September. Altiti was prevented from working as a correspondent of Aqsa TV by the security forces last November on the basis of a decision issued by the cabinet prohibiting Al-Aqsa work in the West Bank on 16 September 2007. The security forces have also arrested him several times during the past two years.
(25 June) – Journalist Ala’ Altiti was arrested by the Palestinian Intelligence Force in the city of Hebron. Altiti said that a group of members of the above mentioned force arrested him as he stood in front of the telecommunications company in the city of Hebron at about 02:30pm and took him to the headquarters of the intelligence where they accused him of having interview for Aqsa Television with Dr. Aziz Dweik, The Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council who was released from the Israeli prison a few days ago. He has denied having an interview with Dweik and was released at about 06:30pm.
(27 June) – Reuter’s photographer Nayef Hashlamoun and a number of Palestinian journalists were attacked in the village of Safa (Hebron) by Israeli occupation forces. Hashlamoun said that he was covering a voluntary work of Palestinian, Israeli and international supporters in the village of Safa morning when one of the Israeli soldiers severely beaten his chest and his right hand resulting in his fall to the ground and one of his cameras was crashed. The occupation forces have prevented the access of the ambulance to the place where he stayed about half an hour lying on the ground suffering from severe pain in the heart area. His brother, Najeh has succeeded with other journalists to transfer him to Alia Hospital in the city of Hebron for treatment. Najeh, who works as a freelance photographer, said that he and the other journalists in the place were exposed of to pushing and kicking by the soldiers, particularly the France Press photographer Hazem Bader, Reuter’s cameramanYosri Al-Jamal and his assistant Maamoun Wazwaz, the Associated Press cameraman Fadi Hamad and the European Agency (EPA) photographer Abd Al- Hafiz Al-Hashlamoun.
Contact: Mousa Rimawi Ramallah Mada Coordinator info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com http://www.madacenter.org
***22.06.09. IRAN. IFJ Demands Safety for Iranian Journalists as Union Leaders Go into Hiding
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on the Iranian authorities to guarantee the safety and freedom of all journalists attempting to cover events in Iran following reports of journalists being arrested and union leaders going into hiding over the weekend. "The Iranian authorities must immediately release all imprisoned journalists and send a clear signal that journalists are to be allowed to work freely and without fear of arrest or intimidation," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "We are particularly concerned about the fate of Ali Mazrooei, Chair of the Association of Iranian Journalists." According to reports, Mazrooei and other leaders of the Association, an affiliate of the IFJ, have gone into hiding following the arrests of journalists and demonstrators over the weekend. Newsweek correspondent, Maziar Bahari, was arrested on Sunday, while John Leyne, BBC Tehran correspondent, has been asked to leave the country. Further reports suggest that up to ten Iranian journalists have been arrested and many others have gone into hiding. Several foreign journalists such as Mikel Ayestarán from Spanish daily ABC have left the country after the refusal of the authorities to extend their temporary visas. These developments follow widespread restrictions on foreign media in Iran and the closing of many websites by the authorities.
***18.06.09 IRAN - THE PRESS EMBLEM CAMPAIGN (PEC) SUPPORTS CALLS FOR END TO GOVERNMENT CRACKDOWN ON MEDIA FOLLOWING ELECTION
Iranian authorities have censored independent media sources, both local and foreign, as anti-government protests have raged in the country following last Friday's presidential elections, report ARTICLE 19, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and other IFEX members.
The security services have moved into the offices of newspapers where they are censoring content before they go to print, reports RSF. The 15 June front page of "Etemad Meli", the paper of candidate Mehdi Karoubi, shows a photo of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a rally with a column left blank because of editing by the censors.
Meanwhile, "Kalameh Sabz", the paper of Ahmedinejad's main challenger Mir Hossein Mousavi, has not been able to publish since 13 June.
According to ARTICLE 19, the intelligence ministry has reportedly ordered all newspapers not to write anything which questions the legitimacy of the elections.
Ahmadinejad lashed out at the media shortly after he claimed victory in the election that critics contend was marked by widespread voter fraud. At a news conference on Sunday, he accused international media of launching a "psychological war" against the country.
Staff from several international news organisations, including Belgian, Spanish, Canadian, U.S., Emirati and Italian newscasters, have had tapes confiscated, been ordered to leave the country, been beaten while covering public protests and have even been detained, says ARTICLE 19.
Following a massive opposition rally on 15 June, authorities restricted foreign journalists - including Iranians working for foreign media - from reporting about the protests on the streets, report CPJ and the International Press Institute (IPI). They could effectively only work from their offices, conducting telephone interviews and monitoring official sources, such as state TV.
The BBC said that electronic jamming of its news report, which it said began on election day, had worsened by the end of the weekend, causing service disruptions for BBC viewers and listeners in Iran, the Middle East and Europe.
On 14 June, the authorities ordered the Tehran bureau of the Arab satellite TV news station Al-Arabiya closed for a week after it broadcast video of the first demonstration following the announcement of Ahmadinejad's re-election, reports the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI).
A range of social communications has also been disrupted inside Iran since election day, including text messaging, social networking sites and official campaign websites of the opposition that were being used to organise protests. At least 10 pro-opposition websites have been censored, says RSF. Then on 16 June, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard warned online media to remove all content that might "create tension," or face legal consequences, reports IPI.
But some protesters in Iran are reaching out to the West using special web servers, such as one developed at the University of Toronto, to circumvent efforts to block websites.
Plus, Iranians abroad are using social networking tools to instantly spread news about their homeland. For instance, on Twitter, Hamid Akbari, a university student in Toronto, follows eight people in Iran he has come to trust, reports the "Toronto Star" newspaper. They tweet about where protesters are gathering for a demonstration, and what police are doing. Akbari then feeds that information to his 500 contacts back home by email or through Facebook.
Meanwhile, 11 Iranian journalists have been arrested since 12 June, including Reza Alijani, winner of the 2001 RSF-Fondation de France press freedom prize. He was released two days later. According to RSF, there is no word from about 10 other journalists who have either been arrested or gone into hiding.
RSF reiterates its appeal to the international community not to recognise the election results. "A democratic election is one in which the media are free to monitor the electoral process and investigate fraud allegations but neither of these two conditions has been met for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's supposed re-election," RSF said.
Related stories on IFEX.org: - Government cracks down on foreign news media: http://www.ifex.org/iran/2009/06/17/media_crackdown/ - Authorities crackdown on media in election aftermath: http://www.ifex.org/iran/2009/06/17/crackdown_on_media/ - News and information fall victim to electoral coup: http://www.ifex.org/iran/2009/06/15/post-election_crackdown/
More on the web: - Twittering Iranians tell the world (Toronto Star): http://www.thestar.com/Article/651927 - The 15 June front page of Etemad Meli, with a photo of President Ahmadinejad at a rally with a column left blank because of editing by the censors (Roozna.com): http://roozna.com/2009/6/15/EtemaadMelli/944/Page/1/EtemaadMelli_944_1.pdf - Internet filtering in Iran (OpenNet Initiative): http://opennet.net/research/profiles/iran - International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran: http://www.iranhumanrights.org/
***15.06.09. RUSSIA. IFJ Report Finds 'Partial Justice' in Hunt for Killers of Journalists in Russia
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today launched 'Partial Justice' report, a review into the deaths of more than 300 Russian journalists since 1993, at a conference in Moscow hosted by the Russian Union of Journalists. "The murder of Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006 shocked the world. Yet for every Anna, there have been many less widely known journalists killed for their work across Russia," said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. "For the first time this report and the accompanying database present a comprehensive record of these murders, whether taking place in cross-fires in conflict zones, or homicide and contract killings, whether journalists killed for their work or in unexplained accidents, or even for personal dealings." The IFJ review shows that of the 313 journalists' deaths in Russia since 1993: Up to 124 have died as a direct result of their journalism; 19 were clearly murdered for their journalism and another 19 cases reveal strong evidence to suggest they were also killed for their work, most of hom died outside and far from Moscow ; 189 of the deaths appear to be unrelated to their work. The report also reveals that the total impunity that existed for killers of journalists until 1997 has gradually receded and that an increasing umber of investigations have led to prosecutions and a form of 'Partial Justice'. The ten cases brought to trial of journalists killed for their work since 1997 saw a 50 per cent conviction rate. Of these, however, only two led to the jailing of all those responsible for the murder. Crucially, the report confirms that the masterminds of attacks on journalists are getting away with murder. Over the past 15 years those who ordered the killings and arranged for the hire of assassins and their payment have hardly ever been charged, let alone prosecuted. The report examines six case studies of killed journalists in depth, reviewing the circumstances around the death, the response of the authorities and the reasons behind the failure of the investigation. These analyses reveal the weaknesses of the investigations by police and the prosecutor's office, especially when dealing with the targeted killings of journalists. A data base launched alongside the report details the circumstances surrounding the deaths of more than 300 journalists in Russia. The first of its kind http://journalists-in-russia.org/journalists/ classifies these eaths (and disappearances) into five different categories -, homicide, accident, crossfire, terrorist act, incident not confirmed and missing. The report includes the following recommendations to the Russian authorities: Measures must be taken to tackle the total impunity that persists in parts of the country where no one has yet been prosecuted for the murder of a journalist, in particular the North Caucasus (including Chechnya) and St Petersburg. Greater support should be provided for investigations and prosecutions where a journalist has been killed for their work. Crimes against journalists often have distinctive features; the Prosecutor General's office should establish a nationwide database on journalists' crimes to identify these features and develop guidelines to maximize chances of successful investigations. Some crimes, particularly contract killings, would benefit from being investigated by teams from outside the region where they have been committed. Findings of investigations should be accessible for review by victim's families and lawyers. Consider making the killing of a journalist a more serious offence. "The world journalists' community is grateful to all the monitors and researchers who worked hard to produce the most outstanding record of journalists killed in Russia," added Boumelha. "It is now up to government agencies, prosecutors and the police to act swiftly in bringing the killers to justice and to make journalism safer." The review is an initiative of the International Federation of Journalists in collaboration with the Russian Union of Journalists, the Glasnost Defence Foundation and the Centre for Journalism in Extreme Situations. This is part of world Congress in Moscow in 2007.
***12.06.09 INSI welcomes Daniel Pearl Act passed by US House
Brussels, 12 June - The International News Safety Institute on Friday welcomed passage of the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act by the US House of Representatives and urged the Senate and President Obama to speed its progress into law.
The measure, passed late on Wednesday as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, expands the examination of press freedom worldwide in the State Department's annual human rights report and establishes a grant programme aimed at strengthening media independence internationally. It will now go before the Senate and, if approved, on to President Obama for signature.
"This Act aims to give real teeth to efforts to promote press freedom by ensuring protection against harm for journalists around the world," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "We hope the Senate and President Obama give it their full support.
"If the Act passes into law, countries where journalists are killed and persecuted for doing their jobs will be named and shamed".
"Our many colleagues working in fear of their lives then will know they have powerful friends who are watching over them."
The Daniel Pearl Act -- authored by Congressmen Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Mike Pence (R-IN), co-chairmen of the Congressional Caucus for Freedom of the Press -- is named after the Wall Street Journal reporter who was kidnapped and murdered by terrorists in Pakistan in February, 2002.
At least 34 news media who have died trying to cover the news this year, bringing the total since 1996 to more than 1,400.
INSI, a non-governmental organisation supported by news organisations,journalist support groups and humanitarian concerns worldwide, has now provided safety training at no cost to 1,223 journalists and other news media staff in 20 countries.
Any questions on this news release should be addressed to Rodney Pinder tel +44 7734 709267 or email rodney.pinder@newssafety.org
***10.06.09. GEORGIA. Russia Jams Georgian FM Radio Channels (from the Press Emblem Campaign Regional Representative)
The FINANCIAL -- Russian special services are using jamming machines to block Georgian radio channels in Shida Kartli region of Georgia, according to the information obtained by The Independent Association of Georgian Journalists. Zviad Pochkhua , Head of the association and Regional Representative of the Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) said the first signals were received from the local inhabitants of Gori region where the majority of IDPs are concentrated. They said radio signals are jammed time to time.
"We traveled through Gori region to be convinced of that news. Sounds of Georgian radio channels disappeared as we crossed the Shida Kartli Region, places still controlled by Georgian authorities. All you can receive on FM is the Russian military channel, broadcasting news and patriotic songs".
Zviad Pochkhua condemned that fact and said international involvement is needed to stop jamming. "Shida Kartli region is mainly populated by Georgians. There are thousands of IDP-s from conflict zone for whom radio is the main source of information", IAGJ said.
Russia has been accused of attacking Georgian websites in a cyber war to accompany their military bombardment.
Georgian authorities have been blocking Russian news channels Rossiya, Channel One, and NTV, as well as Web sites ending in ".ru" since August 9.
Russian news sites were accessible only via proxy servers, and that Russian news channels have been blocked since last week due to "biased reporting and propaganda.
South Ossetia was the focus of war between Russia and Georgia in 2008. It declared independence from Georgia and was recognised by Russia and Nicaragua.
During the Cold War Soviet Union was well experienced in jamming of some Western broadcasters.
Radio Free Europe and its sister service Radio Liberty were the main target of Soviet jammers followed by Voice of America and the BBC World Service.
Special equipments to jam radio signals were used by Russian authorities during the war in Chechnia.
***09.06.09.Somali journalists stop work to mourn and condemn ‘savage’ killing of their colleagues
A somber mood engulfed Somali capital Mogadishu today after journalists downed their tools and shut down their broadcasting stations to mourn and to protest the latest killing of Radio Shebele director, Muktar Mohamed Hirabe. 15 senior radio journalists of editors, producers, reporters, and anchors held a press conference at Hotel Sahafi today and announced the work stoppage.
Muktar Hirabe who was in the company of his colleague Ahmed Omar Hashi, was on Sunday (7 June) shot five times by a gunman at Bakara market in Mogadishu. Ahmed Omar who described the attack and killing as “vindictive and barbaric” was also injured in the attack. Muktar is the fifth journalist to be killed in Somalia by gunmen this year alone, and according to the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) the death is a confirmation that the Somali journalist has become a serious target of those who are averse to truth.
“We are sad but we won’t relent, we are concerned but won’t be afraid. We will march on as journalists despite the assassins' bullet that has been falling us one by one,” said NUSOJ secretary-general, Omar Faruk Osman, while supporting and commending the journalists decision to engage in the black-out picketing in protest to the killing of their colleagues.
But as the journalists carried on with their protests, six journalists have reported to NUSOJ having received death threats from named people, whom they said would be held responsible should they be killed.
“We would go further than just to condemn this killing by calling on all parties engaged in the Somali conflict to respect the life and work of a journalist. Let the killing end. We condemn the continued murders with impunity in Somalia. We now demand that the international community should take serious attention in this Horn of Africa country that has been transformed into more or less a butchery of journalists,” Omar said.
He said the killing must be condemned with all the contempt it deserves. "We must not only stop at talking about senseless killings in Somalia but must do everything possible to bring to book the perpetrators of the killings. If we in Somalia are also part of the international community, then it is high time the international community intervened in solidarity with the people and journalists of Somalia,” he said.
“It was another savage killing of a journalist in Somalia; the fall of our beloved Muktar Mohamed Hirabe was dreadful, devastating and tragic. We are still mourning and sharing in grief with those he left behind (his family), may Allah bless his soul and give him a place in the JANNAH and also wish a better life hereafter, AMIN” said a weeping Mogadishu journalist, whose name cannot be identified because he fears for his life.
“Muktar Mohamed Hirabe was a dearly loved colleague who worked with dedication and a great sense of teamwork. He was not at any time deterred by danger and I still remember him joking in my office, a day before the merciless butchers shot him brutally, wounding our other colleague Ahmed Tajir, not too far away from my office. He was our elder brother in the profession, solver of our problems, and advice-giver as a qualified colleague,” the un-named journalist said.
“I heard gunshots and a friend came to me running to the office where I was busy writing saying: 'Hey did you hear the gunshots? He asked me and swiftly followed with an answer even before I said a word, ‘Two men were shot and one of them is dead out there,” he narrated.
“I pulled my drawer quickly and picked up my camera to reach the scene in order to take photos of the victims without knowing that two of my close colleagues had been shot. I got out running with the camera but before I reached the scene where the lifeless body of brother Hirable lay, another friend who saw him came to me and told me that the dead body is Hirabe's. ‘Hey! Get back to your office before you are found, there is the dead body of your friend Hirabe’ he told me. I was shocked and stopped on the spot without moving towards any direction for about several minutes. I could not move my legs for some minutes due to shock, and I later got back to my office without seeing the dead body of my colleague”.
“I was terrified and started thinking about what has happened to my colleague for a long time and my eyes started welling up in tears. On Monday, I went to attend a press conference held by Hassan Dahir Aweys but still I’m down in the dumps, vulnerable and doomed to failure and fear.”
“We know who killed Hirabe and other colleagues but we cannot speak. We can simply say the same oppressors that assassinated our late colleagues are the same ones who gunned down Hirabe. I believe that other fellow journalists like me are also kept in the waiting list of those enjoying committing crimes and killing journalists with the highest level of impunity. They keep killing the harmless journalists who have nobody to defend them but God.”
According to Ahmed Omar Hashi, They first shot Hirabe at the back of his head and he fell face down. I managed to escape with gunshots in my stomach. It was devilish assassination. I glanced back and saw a youth in his early 20s standing on Hirabe and shooting Hirabe in the head. It was the most savage and violent action I have ever witnessed,” Ahmed Omar Hashi said.
Abdriahman Yusuf, the editor of Shabele radio, also said that the killing of Hirabe resembles that of Said Tahlil Ahmed who was killed on 4 February this year.
“They Shot Hirabe in the head, just like they did to Said Tahlil. They are killing every journalist in this country and their aim is to eliminate us all,” Abdirahman said.
The burial ceremony of Hirabe was disrupted shortly after four hooded men appeared and scared away his journalist colleagues who fled in fear, leaving behind the body to be buried by some of his relatives and neighbors.
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is shocked by the attack and assassination of fifth journalists in Mogadishu.
Two men with pistols attacked Muktar Mohamed Hirabe, Director of Radio Shabelle and Ahmed Omar Hashi (Tajir), News Editor of Radio Shabelle, in Bakara Market. The attackers killed on the spot Muktar Mohamed Hirabe after shooting him at the head five times. They also wounded seriously Ahmed Omar Hashi after shooting at the stomach twice. Late Muktar and Ahmed, 41, were walking together when attacked.
“Assassination of Muktar Mohamed Hirabe is a premeditated and targeted killing. Muktar Mohamed Hirabe was experienced, well-respected and well-known journalist. Situation is beyond condemnation. Somali journalists are not dying because of the conflict,” Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
“Ahmed Omar Hashi is a living witness of serous crimes constantly committed against journalists. While hoping immediate recovery, colleagues who are committed to do their job in this extreme situation need to be protected”, Omar Faruk added.
Today, 7 June, is the first anniversary of the murder of Vice President of the National Union of Somali Journalists late Nasteh Daher Farah in Kismayu.
Muktar Mohamed Hirabe, 48, is the fifth journalist assassinated in Somalia in this year. He is also the third journalist murdered in this year from Radio Shabelle and in Mogadishu. NUSOJ and INSI trained Muktar Mohamed Hirabe in Djibouti on how to operate in unsafe environment in June 2008. Two wives and 5 children survived from Muktar Mohamed Hirabe.
On a separate case, Director of UNIVERSAL TV, Ibrahim Mohamed Ali, nicknamed "Jeekey", who was kidnapped in Garasbaley village on 2 June 2009 by four hooded and armed men was released today by the kidnappers.
For further information, contact: National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, tel/fax: +252 1 859 944, e-mail: newsletter@nusoj.org Internet: http://www.nusoj.org
***06.06.09. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) - Media freedom violations in oPt during May 2009
Last May has witnessed a continuation of violations against the Palestinian journalists, especially by the Israeli occupation authorities, which included the arrest of journalists Azmi Ash-Shioukhi, Ahmad Jalajil and his assistant, Raed Sarhan, the injury of Abdel-Rahman Khabisah and the closure of a Palestinian media center in Jerusalem.
The Israeli occupation authorities continued to impose house arrest and resumed the trial of the AlalamTelevision correspondent, Khader Shahin, and producer, Mohamed Sarhan, since the fifteenth of last December .
Security forces have arrested cameraman Osaid Amarneh and kept journalists Mustafa Sabri and Murad Abu Al-Baha under arrest since last April, There is information that those journalists were exposed to torture
MADA Center condemns all attacks against journalists by the Israeli occupation forces, and the arrests of journalists by the Palestinian security apparatuses, and it demands the cessation of allattacks against journalists, and the release of the detained ones.
Details of Violations:
(May 1) - General Supervisor of Palestine Media and information Network Azmi Ash-Shiukhi was arrested by the Israeli occupation forces. Ash-Shiikhi said that he was arrested with a number of participants in the weekly march against the apartheid Wall in Al-Mia'sara village south of Bethlehem, and that they were harrased during the arrest as well as after transferring them to the police station in Kfar Etzion. Ash-Shiukhi has been investigated for participating in the march and accused of incitement to organize demonstrations against the construction of the wall and settlements. The day following his arrest, he has been isolated in a solitary cell because of his call for the prisoners on hunger strike in protest against the ill-treatment, food and clothing. Ash-Shiukhi has been brought five times to the trial before Ofer court for charges of inciting for demonstrations. He was released on the thirteenth of May, after being sentenced for one year in prison with a stay of execution, and he was prevented from participating in marches, in addition to financial penalty of twenty thousand shekels (about five thousand dollars).
(May 11) - Palestinian Information Office was closed in the city of Jerusalem, by the Israeli occupation forces. Lawyer, Ahmed Ar-Rwaidi, said that an Israeli security force raided the Ambassador Hotel, at which the Center was established to cover the visit of Pope Benedict XVI and handed him an order from the Israeli Minister of Internal Security to close the Center. The force also confiscated the contents of the Center such as files, papers, and the sign. He indicated that the Hotel's Hall had been rented for the establishment of the Center, especially in light of preventing the Palestinians journalists from covering the visit of the Pope during his tour in Jerusalem, and to give the opportunity to the personalities and institutions of Jerusalem to express their opinions.
(May 18) – Cameraman Osaid Amarneh was arrested by the Palestinian Preventive Security in Bethlehem. His family said that he had received a notice from the above mentioned force and then he went at ten o'clock where he was arrested and exposed to torture in the first day. The day next, he was transferred to regular rooms in the prison and then his family has visited him. The family had been told by the Preventive security that there are no charges against him, but he was held due to the political situation. Osaid was arrested several times by the security forces and forced to sign a pledge not work for Al-Aqsa Television.
(May 29) - Associated Press cameraman Abd Ar-Rahman Khabisa was injured by the Israeli occupation forces in the village of Bil'in west of Ramallah. Khabisa said that he was covering the weekly march against the Apartheid Wall in Bil'in village when the Israeli soldiers fired a gas canister at him which hit him between his legs resulting in the burning of his clothes and a slight burnt at the top of the legs. Later he moved about ten meters away from the location in which he was filming. Ten minutes later the soldiers shot him with a sound grenade that burnt his abdomen; he was transferred to Skiek Zayed hospital in Ramallah for treatment. Khabisa confirmed that the bombs were fired at him by the soldiers deliberately.
(May 29) –Palestine Media and Communications Company cameraman Ahmed Jalajel, and his assistant, Raed Sarhan were arrested by the Israeli police in the city of Jerusalem. Jalajel said that he was filming inside Al-Aqsa Mosque on that day and when departed from Al- Asbat Gate at about one o'clock afternoon, approximately twenty policemen were waiting them. They confiscated the camera and cellular phones, arrest them and transferred them to nearby police station. They have been investigated how they passed the camera into the Mosque. One hour later, they were transferred to another police station in the old city where investigation was resumed on filming inside the Mosque which is prohibited unless by a permission by the police. He told the police, "we interred as journalists and it is our right to film". They have been released at around five o'clock in the evening after signing a financial guarantee of 3000 Shekels (about 750 dollars) and an order preventing them from entering the Mosque for a 15 day period. Moreover, they have been notified not to enter into Al-Aqsa during the period of prevention otherwise they will be arrested.
***29.05.09. PAKISTAN. Suicide car bomb injures 20 journalists, damages offices of newspapers, television stations
(PPF/IFEX) - Twenty journalists were injured in a massive suicide car bomb blast on 27 May 2009 that killed at least 30 people and injured over 250, in Lahore, the capital of Pakistan's Punjab province. Offices of a number of newspapers and television stations were also damaged in the blast.
According to the Punjab Union of Journalists (PUJ), more than 20 journalists and media workers suffered multiple injuries. The journalists, who were working in their offices at the time, represent the daily "Khabrain", the daily "Nia Akhbar", Channel 5, the daily "Nawa-i-Waqt" and "Daily Ausaf" newspaper, located near the site of the blast.
The names of injured journalists, listed by the PUJ are: Rana Muhammmad Azeem, Chief Reporter (Channel 5) and Secretary General of the PUJ, Ashraf Majjed ("Khabrain"), Raza Mughal ("Nia Akhbar"), Rafeq Naqshbandi ("Nia Akhbar"), Hafiz Tariq (Channel 5), Azeem Nazeer (Channel 5), Adnan (Channel 5), Irfan (Channel 5), Shahid (Channel 5), Shukat (Channel 5), Omer (Channel 5), Yasir (Channel 5), Sultan (Channel 5), Qazi Tariq ("Daily Ausaf"), Gulzar Chudhary ("Daily Ausaf"), Ghazanfar Awan ("Daily Ausaf"), Nadeem Aftab ("Islamabad Times"), Ghazanfar ("Islamabad Times"), Babar ("Islamabad Times"), Abdul Jabbar ("Nawa-i-Waqt") and Muhammad Kaleem ("Khabrain").
The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) and the PUJ strongly condemn the blast and express sorrow over the loss of innocent lives.
In a press statement, the PFUJ urged the federal and provincial governments to take remedial measures for the safety and protection of journalists, who are facing insecurity in the wake of increasing terrorist activity.
***29.05.09. SRI LANKA. Journalists trying to cover fate of Tamils are threatened, obstructed
Reporters Without Borders is extremely worried by statements by Sri Lankan officials, including army commander Gen. Sarath Fonseka, that journalists who visited areas formerly controlled by the Tamil Tiger rebels will be prosecuted.
At the same time, access to refugee camps and Tamil areas in general is still severely regulated, preventing the press from obtaining information about the fate of the Tamil population. Journalists and witnesses who dared to speak out have been intimidated and arrested.
“The war is over,” Reporters Without Borders said. “There is no longer any reason for the army to impose so many restrictions on media working in the Tamil areas, including restrictions on access to refugee camps. The United Nations - which deliberately minimised the suffering of Tamil civilians, according to the French newspaper Le Monde - should make an effort to obtain unrestricted access to refugee camps for the press and humanitarian aid workers.”
A humanitarian aid worker said: “At the checkpoints installed on the roads leading to Tamil areas, soldiers always ask the same question: ‘What are you going to do there?’.” Journalists are turned back if they lack official authorisation. The few foreign journalists who have covered the Tamil camps have been targeted by the government. A TV crew working for Britain’s Channel 4 was expelled.
Most of the Sri Lankan media have not sent reporters to the Tamil areas. The press have only managed to get into these areas when there have been visits by Sri Lankan and international official such as UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has not been allowed to visit some detention camps.
Reporters Without Borders reiterates its call for the release of three Tamil doctors - Thangamuttu Sathiyamorthi, Thurairaja Varatharajan and V. Sunmugarajah - who have been held since 18 may for providing the international media with information about the humanitarian situation in the Vanni district. ICRC representatives were allowed to see them in Colombo.
The army is trying to identify Tamils who provided information to the foreign press. A humanitarian aid worker who visited a camp near Vavuniya told Reporters Without Borders that members of Tamil paramilitary groups have been infiltrated into some camps with the aim of identifying those who are trying to get their stories to the media.
The army recently blocked the arrival of several dozen nuns who had obtained health ministry permission to visit camps to help refugees, especially those who have been psychologically traumatised.
Reporters Without Borders condemns the way Vavuniya-based journalist Mahamuni Subramaniam, a stringer for various news media including Reuters, has been treated. He was arrested on 14 May while covering the justice minister’s visit to the Ramanathan refugee camp.
Claiming that only journalists with the ITN and Rupavahini TV stations were allowed to film or take pictures of the minister’s meeting with a general, the police confiscated his expensive camera and still have not returned it to him, although he has petitioned the High Court for its return.
“During these inquiries once Major General Chandrasiri came out and verbally abused me saying I am a LTTE suspect and ordered the military to check me thoroughly.” Subramaniam said in a letter. “When I claimed that I am a reporter for Reuters, he vehemently said all foreign journalists are working against his homeland.”
A report in Le Monde yesterday accused the United Nations, especially the secretary-general’s chief of staff, Vijay Nambiar, of deliberately playing down the number of Tamil casualties during the fighting so as not to anger the government and thereby jeopardise the UN’s ability to continue operating in the country. An estimated 20,000 Tamils died in the fighting.
A resolution adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on 27 May praising the Sri Lankan government was an insult to the Tamil victims, Reporters Without Borders added.
***26.05.09. SOMALIA. Somali Journalists Shocked as Fourth Journalist Dies
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is today shocked by the death of veteran journalist Nur Muse Hussein (Nur Inji) who died today from injuries he sustained from a targeted shooting in Beledweyne city of Hiran region in Central Somalia on 20 April 2009.
Nur Muse Hussein, 56, was wounded while he was trying to cover fighting in Beledweyn between militias loyal to Hiran Regional Administration and Hisbul Islam, an Islamic movement that operates in southern central regions of Somalia.
According to fellow journalists and his widow, Nur Muse Hussein who was with three other journalists when wounded by one of the fighters after they identified themselves as journalists, a Pedestrian walking behind the journalists reportedly died on the spot for the bullets that came through Nur’s leg, who worked for Radio Voice of Holy Quran in Mogadishu as their correspondent in Central regions. Bullets fractured his right leg. Nur Muse Hussein was in serious condition since the attack but his condition deteriorated in the last week, according to his widow.
“Nur Muse Hussein paid greatly for his dedication to journalistic profession. Today is another unforgettable and sad day for Somali journalists community,” Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. “Nur is the fourth journalist that became victim in this year for the crimes committed by the gun carrying men in Somalia. The death of Nur Muse Hussein highlights the unacceptable, continuing and deliberate violence against journalists in Somalia”.
Nur Muse Hussein left 5 children and a widow.
Abdirisak Warsameh Mohamed, nicknamed Gadao, of Radio Shabelle was shot dead on the morning of 22 May 2009 by forces fighting in the neighbourhoods near Bakara Market in Mogadishu. He was killed as he was crossing the road near Wardhigley police station, according to the director of Radio Shabelle, Mukhtar Mohamed Hirabe.
Three men with pistols assassinated the well-respected Said Tahlil Ahmed, director of HornAfrik Radio in Mogadishu, on 4 February 2009 at around 2:45 p.m. (local time).
On 1 January, Hassan Mayow Hassan, a reporter for Radio Shabelle, was gunned down by a member of a pro-government militia in Afgoye, 30 kilometers south of Mogadishu. He is the first journalist killed in 2009 in the world.
-- For further information, contact: National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, tel/fax: +252 1 859 944, e-mail: newsletter@nusoj.org Internet: http://www.nusoj.org
***26.05.09.FEPALC emplaza a Estado mexicano - CONSTERNACIÓN POR EL ASESINATO DE OTRO PERIODISTA EN MÉXICO
La Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (FEPALC) expresa su consternación por el hallazgo en un río del cuerpo del periodista Eliseo Barrón Hernández, reportero del diario La Opinión.
De acuerdo a las autoridades de la Procuraduría General de Justicia del estado de Durango, el cuerpo de Barrón Hernández, corresponsal de Milenio y reportero desde hace 11 años del periódico La Opinión, fue encontrado en el Ejido Eureka, en un canal de riego. Se presume que el cadáver presenta al menos cuatro impactos de bala. La FEPALC, al tiempo de exigir la investigación de este nuevo crimen contra un comunicador social, expresa su honda preocupación por lo que está ocurriendo en el estado de Durango. Este es el segundo periodista victimado en esa zona en lo que va del año. El último 3 de mayo, irónicamente Día Mundial de la libertad de Prensa, victimaron al periodista Carlos Ortega Melo Samper. A la fecha se desconoce el avance de las investigaciones. México a la fecha se ha convertido en el país más peligroso para el ejercicio del periodismo. Esta situación se acentúa por el grado de impunidad garantiza a los victimarios. A la fecha en el 96% de los casos de crímenes contra periodistas no se ha hecho justicia. Barrón Hernández es el quinto periodista asesinado en México en el 2009. Le antecedieron el periodista Carlos Ortega Melo Samper (3 de mayo), Paul Ibarra Ramírez (13 de enero), Daniel Méndez Hernández (23 de febrero) y Juan Carlos Hernández (28 de febrero). La FEPALC, fiel a sus principios, expresa su solidaridad con su organización afiliada, el Sindicato Nacional de Redactores de la Prensa (SNRP), de México, con los compañeros y compañeras de trabajo del periodista asesinado y con sus familiares a quienes les expresa sus más sentidas condolencias y les ratifica que no cesará en interpelar a las autoridades para que se haga justicia. 26 de mayo 2009 Celso Schroder Presidente FEPALC Zuliana Lainez Secretaria Derechos Humanos FEPALC
***13.05.09. PAKISTAN. Journalists flee Swat valley en masse
Reporters Without Borders and the Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) are alarmed by the situation in the Swat valley as the Pakistani armed forces step up their operations against the Taliban there. Newspapers had already stopped publishing after the military imposed a curfew. Now journalists are fleeing to safer areas. The Khyber Union of Journalists yesterday urged the government to allow the media access to Mingora, the largest city in the valley.
“It is now impossible to get independently-sourced information about what is happening in the Swat valley,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Journalists are fleeing en masse. None of them wants to stay there anymore. We urge the authorities to issue journalists with permits that allow them to circulate during curfew hours. We also call for immediate measures to guarantee the security of journalists, so that they can return to the valley and resume working there.”
Reporters Without Borders added: “The Swat valley has become a lawless area without news media and without journalists. This situation is unacceptable and must be remedied by the government at once.”
At a news conference, Khyber Union of Journalists president Mohammad Riaz said: “There is a complete blackout of news from Swat, Buner and Dir. There is no source of dissemination of news. No one is aware about the actual situation.”
Swat press club president Salahuddin Khan told Reporters Without Borders yesterday that all the journalists had left the valley and that it was “now without any news media.”
Veteran journalists such as Ghulam Farooq, the editor of Shamal, and Fayyaz Zafar, the editor of the online newspaper Zama Swat, left Swat on 7 May and moved to cities such as Peshawar. “I have just left with my family and I am staying with a friend a long way from Mingora as journalism is no longer an easy trade to practice,” Farooq told Reporters Without Borders by phone.
A few journalists such as TV reporter Shireenzada had been holding on despite the danger. He told Reporters Without Borders a few days ago: “Let’s hope nothing serious happens.” He said he had stockpiled fuel and food for the difficult days to come. He was the last reporter to try to provide information about what was happening in the combat zone.
Shireenzada finally pulled out for safety reasons yesterday. “I have also left Swat with my family because it is extremely hard to be a journalist in the current situation,” he said. “Swat is now without any journalists.”
Shireenzada said there were still several thousand inhabitants trapped in Mingora waiting for the end of the curfew in order to leave for safer areas. He added that they would soon run out of water and food because of the lack of electricity and the curfew.
***08.05.09. SRI LANKA: The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) supports the call launched by UN human rights experts for an urgent international scrutiny
GENEVA - The UN Human Rights Council experts dealing with summary executions, right to health, right to food and water and sanitation, Mr. Philip Alston, Mr. Anand Grover, Mr. Olivier De Schutter and Ms. Catarina de Albuquerque, released the following statement Friday:
The current humanitarian crisis in Sri Lanka gives cause for deep concern, not only in terms of the number of civilians who have been and continue to be killed, but because of a dramatic lack of transparency and accountability. “There is good reason to believe that thousands of civilians have been killed in the past three months alone, and yet the Sri Lankan Government has yet to account for the casualties, or to provide access to the war zone for journalists and humanitarian monitors of any type”, said Philip Alston, the UN expert on summary executions.
The continuing catastrophic situation of civilians in Sri Lanka trapped in the midst of fighting between the Sri Lankan army and the LTTE, in an area measuring less than 10 sq km, must be immediately addressed. “These civilians do not have sufficient access to food, essential medical supplies or services and safe water and sanitation. Even if they do escape death or injury at the hands of the hostile parties, their continued presence in this area without access to these basic rights is an effective death sentence,” declared the Experts of the UN Human Rights Council. “The safety of civilians, including their safe passage out of the conflict zone, must be prioritized by all actors involved” said the Experts. While many thousands of civilians have now left this area, the Experts maintained their concern about the safety of more than 50,000 estimated by the UN to still remain. Shipments of food and medicine to the “no fire zone” have been grossly insufficient over the past month and the Government has reportedly delayed or denied timely shipment of life saving medicines as well as to chlorine tablets. “As a result of the blackout on independent information sources, it is impossible to verify any of the Government’s claims as to the number of casualties to date or as to the steps that it says it is taking in order to minimize the further killing of innocent civilians, and ensure delivery of humanitarian assistance”, said the Experts.
“When people manage to escape, they reportedly continue to face scant supplies, entirely insufficient access to adequate medical treatment and severely overcrowded hospitals, providing no relief to the horrors they had been living,” remarked Anand Grover, the UN expert on the right to health. “Access to food has also been hampered by arduous and lengthy registration procedures for the internally displaced persons; the desperation and chaos witnessed in some cases show that the situation is critical,” said Olivier De Schutter, the UN expert on the right to food. Catarina de Albuquerque, the UN expert on water and sanitation, also expressed concern about “water shortages reported at Omanthai and at most of the transit sites as well as inadequate sanitation facilities, which put the health and lives of the population at further risk.” The Government must take urgent measures with the assistance of the international community to ensure that security concerns do not result in unjustifiable suffering.
The Experts called upon the Sri Lankan Government to provide convincing evidence to the international community that it is respecting its obligations under human rights and international humanitarian law. It is also clear that the LTTE, for its part, has acted in flagrant violation of the applicable norms by preventing civilians from leaving the conflict area and having reportedly shot and killed those trying to flee. "There is an urgent need to establish an international commission of inquiry to document the events of recent months and to monitor ongoing developments." The Experts called upon the UN Human Rights Council to establish such a commission, as a matter of urgency, to address the critical situation in Sri Lanka, and demand full respect for all human rights. Any such inquiry should study the conduct of all sides to the conflict.
***06.05.09. PAKISTAN: Media in danger in Swat valley
Reporters Without Borders deplores the deterioration in the media situation in the Swat valley since the military launched an offensive against the Taliban. The valley has been plunged into chaos, fighting is raging, the population is fleeing, and the media are all paralysed.
Local newspapers have stopped publishing for safety reasons. National newspapers are no longer being distributed. Cable television is not working. The authorities have introduced a curfew in Swat and neighbouring districts in a bid to stop the Taliban from reinforcing their positions in the region.
“Over the months, Swat had already become an area where rights were not respected, but the situation has become much worse since newspapers stopped appearing and cable television stopped working,” Reporters Without Borders said. “We urge the Pakistani authorities to give journalists better protection and to issue permits that allow them to circulate during curfew hours so that they are able to do their job.”
The press freedom organisation added: “Newspapers must resume publishing without delay. The population of both the Swat valley and the rest of the country must be able to follow what is happening in the Swat valley.”
Ghulam Farooq, the editor of the daily Shamal, told Reporters Without Borders: “All the newspapers based in Swat have stopped publishing for security reasons, because the situation is extremely dangerous. What’s more, the curfew makes it impossible for our staff to move about.”
Rashid Iqbal, the editor of the daily Chand, said he had not been sending any newspapers to Swat for the past two days. “We are no longer sending newspapers to Swat and we do not know when we will be able to resume distribution,” he told Reporters Without Borders.
Swat’s inhabitants no longer have access to satellite television since the Taliban damaged the district’s only cable distribution network.
“There are no newspapers and no TV stations to find out what is going on around us,” a Swat-based lawyer said. “It is as if we were living in the Stone Age. There is no news, no access to information.”
***06.05.09. MEXICO. Murder of Fourth Journalist in the Year Demonstrates Urgent Need for Legal Reform
On World Press Freedom Day, Carlos Ortega Melo Samper a journalist from the newspaper E l Tiempo de Durango in northern Mexico was assassinated. At the time of his death he had been undertaking investigations of alleged acts of corruption. ARTICLE 19 calls for immediate legal reforms to give the federal-level government the authority to investigate the murder and bring the perpetrators to justice.
On Sunday 3 May at 5 o’clock in the evening, a pick-up truck intercepted Carlos Ortega Melo Samper outside his home in the state of Durango in northern Mexico. The perpetrator fired his 40 caliber pistol three times from the truck, hitting Ortega in the head and killing him. The journalist had been working as a correspondent for the local newspaper El Tiempo for two years; he also worked as a lawyer in the municipality.
In an interview with ARTICLE 19, Fernando Mendoza who works for El Tiempo said that: “ the first line of investigation for this assassination should be for the journalistic activity of Melo Samper and in particular his recent investigation of the sanitary conditions in the municipal slaughterhouse. ” Mendoza added that the staff of El Tiempo had held a meeting with the Governor of the State of Durango, Ismael Alfredo Hernandez Deras, to discuss the investigation.
Melo Samper had complained about threats by local authorities as recently as two weeks prior to his death, for a story he had written on the sanitary conditions in the local state run slaughterhouse. As a result of this incident, before he died he wrote an article in which he stated that mayor of the municipality Martín Silvestre Herrera and Juan Manuel Calderón Guzmán, in charge of federal programmes and the municipal slaughterhouse, were responsible should any harm come to him. This article was in the editorial department of the paper awaiting publication at the time of his murder.
“ Carlos Ortega’s case sadly underscores the need of providing federal authorities with the power and the capacity to investigate and sanction aggressions against journalists, particularly in cases, such as this one, where the local authorities are known to have previously harassed or threatened the victim ”, stated Dr Agnès Callamard, Executive Director of ARTICLE 19.
“ The Mexican authorities must immediately undertake the much required legal and policy reform that would at least address the salient problem of impunity for crimes against the media ”, Dr Callamard added.
The journalist had been at odds with local authorities for a number of years. In July 2005, following a formal complaint, the State Commission of Human Rights for Durango investigated high ranking members the of the local Public Security forces. The Commission concluded that elements of the public Security Forces had violated the journalist’s human rights.
Ortega was famous for his critical writing in the municipality. Since 2003, he worked on a number of local and regional newspapers, including El Sol de Torreón and El Siglo de Durango . Since 2008, he had been writing in El Tiempo as a correspondent and distributor. He contributed to the paper on a daily basis and was also writing for the weekly publication Expresión de Durango . Ortega had been living in the area for more than 10 years.
The assassination of journalists is the ultimate form of censorship. Local media and journalists play a pivotal role in informing society about subjects that are relevant to the local communities. Without a media able to operate freely and without fear, society is prevented from accessing information essential to decision-making and participating in the public life and local affairs.
ARTICLE 19 expresses its solidarity with colleagues, friends, and collaborators of the newspaper E l Tiempo , and with the journalists in the region.
ARTICLE 19 calls on the authorities, in accordance with their international obligations, to investigate effectively the murder and prosecute those responsible.
***06.05.09. PHILIPPINES. A Philippine court convicts one journalist’s killer; another acquits a suspect in a separate case
CMFR/PHILIPPINES—Two local courts recently decided two separate cases of work-related killing of broadcasters in Region XI (Davao Region). Eight out of the 78 work-related killing of journalists/media practitioners since 1986 happened in Region XI.
On 22 April 2009, Judge George Omelio of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 14 in Davao City acquitted a block-timer of the charge of murdering his fellow block-time radio broadcaster Fernando “Batman” Lintuan for lack of additional evidence to support the testimony of the prosecution’s lone witness. Davao City is approximately 978 kms from Manila.
Meanwhile, Judge Albert Axalan of Branch 20 of the Digos City RTC convicted on 24 March 2009 Joy “Tungol” Anticamara, who gunned down block-time radio broadcaster Armando “Rachman” Pace, for homicide instead of murder. Digos City, the capital of Davao del Sur province, is about 995 kms Southeast of Manila. Although it was promulgated 29 April 2009, the decision was signed 24 March 2009.
Since 2001, there have only been three convictions out of the 78 cases of journalists killed— the killers of Marlene Esperat, Edgar Damalerio, and now, Pace. Forty journalists or 51.28 percent of the 78 were killed after Gloria Macapagal Arroyo assumed the presidency in 2001.
Acting on the accused’s demurrer to evidence, the Davao RTC Branch 14 acquitted Leonilo Larosa in the Lintuan case (Criminal Case no. 63,537-2008) after the prosecution failed to present new evidence against him. A demurrer is an application to dismiss the case, which the court or tribunal may grant or deny. The party demurring admits the facts of the preceding pleading to be true, but questions the sufficiency of facts for the case to proceed.
Larosa through his counsel filed a demurrer to evidence last 12 March 2008.
In his decision, Judge Omelio said the testimony of the 19-year-old witness in the Lintuan case was “irreconcilable, contradictory, and incompatible with his statements on other occasions.” The inconsistencies “therefore made him ridiculous and unbelievable,” Omelio added.
Lintuan was shot dead on 24 December 2007 by a gunman riding tandem with an accomplice on a motorcycle. Lintuan was in his car with two colleagues and had just left the dxGO radio station premises.
Lintuan was critical of the local government and was known to be a hard-hitting commentator in Davao. He also criticized the involvement of Larosa in and his promotion of “Last Two”, an illegal numbers game where the winning combination is taken from the last two numbers of the winning combination of the Sweepstakes.
Lintuan had been a radio broadcaster since the 1980s and was also a columnist for Sun.Star Super Balita, a local newspaper in Davao. He was the first president of the Davao Sportswriters Association and was also a member of the Philippine Sports Commission.
In the other media murder case (Criminal Case no. 281-2006), the court sentenced gunman Anticamara to a maximum of 17 years in prison and to pay damages amounting to P151,500.00 for the killing of Pace.
Judge Axalan of the Digos City RTC in his decision said he was convinced that Anticamara killed Pace after the 16-year-old witness positively identified him as the gunman. But the court reduced the offense to homicide because “the evidence on record does not show that the motorcycle was purposely used to facilitate the commission of the crime” but “was used only in facilitating the escape.”
Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ) legal adviser Prima Jesusa Quinsayas explained that “the act of escaping from the crime scene on a motorcycle is different from using a motorcycle to facilitate the crime.” The FFFJ is a coalition organized to address the killing of journalists. Its members are the Kapisanan ng Brodkaster sa Pilipinas (Association of Broadcasters of the Philippines), the Philippine Press Institute, the Center for Community Journalism and Development, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism, the US-based newspaper Philippine News, and the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility, which serves as its secretariat.
“Say a tricycle driver killed someone with a gun. After shooting him, he gets on his tricycle and escapes. That is simply using his tricycle to escape the scene of the crime. If the tricycle driver used his tricycle to get near someone on the pretext of getting the latter as a passenger so as not to arouse suspicion, then shoots him and leaves on the motorcycle, the motorcycle was used to facilitate a crime,” Quinsayas said.
Court records show that the witness saw Anticamara, who has been her neighbor for around 12 years, with a gun after she heard three gunshots and saw Pace dead on the cemented street. Anticamara had always maintained he was innocent.
Despite the decision, Quinsayas said a murder complaint can still be filed against the masterminds should the police or any other law enforcement agency identify them and gather sufficient evidence to establish probable cause, which is necessary for the filing of an information against the masterminds in the Pace case.
“…(J)ustice is never fully served if the mastermind is not identified, arrested, tried and convicted,” Quinsayas said. No mastermind has been convicted since 2001.
Pace was killed on 18 July 2006 minutes after he signed off from his dxDS-Radyo Ukay program Ukadyang, slang in Davao for “ukaya” which means “stir it up”. Pace was shot thrice with a .45-caliber gun by two men riding on a black motorcycle along Rizal Avenue, Digos City. He died on the way to the hospital.
Three months before he was killed, Pace had received death threats through his mobile phone but chose to ignore them and to continue with his work.
Pace was known for his fiery commentaries and for mocking his subjects on the air. He also commented on his subjects’ personal problems, which his colleagues said led to the filing of about a hundred libel suits against him. His reporting style earned him the moniker “Rachman”, a term derived from the word “rak-rak” which means “firing indiscriminately at people”. #
***05.05.09. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA) - Media freedom violations in oPt during April 2009
The Palestinian Center for Development & Media Freedoms (MADA) expresses concern over the escalation of Israeli violations against journalists in the occupied Palestinian territories, and the continued Israeli occupation forces targeting of Journalists who cover the marches against the Apartheid Wall, especially in the villages of Bilain and Nea’lin.
MADA expresses its concern over the return of arrests among journalists in the West Bank, where the independent journalist Mustafa Sabri, the writer Dr.Abd Al-Sattar Qaesem and Murad Abu Al-Bahaa’ were arrested. And the attempt to restrict the travel of some journalists in the Gaza Strip, as in the case of the journalist Sakhr Abu Aoun whose passport was held since March 21st preventing him from traveling to Bahrain to participate in a conference on media freedoms, and Khaled Bulbul, who was prevented from traveling to participate in a training course on professional safety in Cairo.
As MADA condemns all aggressions against journalists, which is considered a gross violation of freedom of expression, MADA demands:
• The international community to exert pressure on the Government of Israel to stop its violations against journalists. • The dismissed government in Gaza strip to allow journalists to move and travel freely. • Releasing all detainee journalists in the prisons of Israel and Palestinian National Authority.
Details of violations:
(April 3) - Reuters photographer, Saed Fathi Hewwari (32 years old), was injured by Israeli occupation forces. Hewwari said that he was covering the weekly march with a group of journalists in Bilain village, when the soldiers fired tear gas canisters at them. One of canisters hit him in his right leg resulting in a wound, and he received treatment in the Al-Sheikh Zayed Hospital in Ramallah. It was mentioned that the Israeli occupation forces began, since a short period, using a new type of tear gas where eight canisters are fired together by a cannon, and they are more dangerous than the usual bombs. This kind of canisters has killed the citizen Basem Abu Rahmeh, in the April 17th in Bilain village when hit him in the chest.
(April 4) –Maan News Agency and Farah TV cameraman, Yousef Mahmoud Ja'ss, from Jenin Refugee Camp was arrested by the Israeli occupation forces. An official of Farah TV said that Ja'ss was going to Ramallah city, when Israeli occupation forces arrested him at Za'tarah checkpoint, between the cities of Nablus and Ramallah, and transferred him the same day to Hewwarah Detention Center near Nablus.
(April 10) - Ramattan Agency cameraman, Ata Mustafa Awad was injured by two gas canisters fired by the Israeli occupation forces. Awad said that he was covering the weekly march against the Apartheid Wall in the village of Nea’lin (Ramallah), when occupation soldiers deliberately fired gas canisters, one of them hit his back and the other hit his right shoulder resulting in the loss of consciousness and falling to the ground. He was treated at a field hospital in the area. Sound technician, Zakaria Al-salhi, was also injured by dense gas inhalation which required transferring him to Ramallah hospital for treatment.
(April 10) - The Associated Press Photographer, Mohammad Mheisen was injured by two gas canisters fired by Israeli occupation forces. Mhaisen said that the soldiers fired tear gas at the demonstrators and journalists during the weekly march in Bilain village, where two of gas canisters hit him, one in the left shoulder and the other in the face directly. He said "if I have not wearing the anti-gas mask it would have burnt my face; the mask and the camera, which was slightly burnt, have protected me."
(April 12) - Quds Net photographer and correspondent, Diala Jwaihan, was detained by Israeli occupation forces for seven hours. Jwaihan said that she was filming Jewish extremists inside Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem at about 13:15pm, when she was stopped by Israeli police who confiscated her camera, her bag and mobile phone, then they took her to the police station at King David Gate in the Old City, and an hour later she was transferred to the an investigation center in the Old City as well, where she was investigated on her press job and that she breached the public order. They told her that it not permitted to film inside Al-Aqsa Mosque and Um Kamel’s Tent for fifteen days, and she was released at 8:00 pm after returning her confiscated properties.
(April 19) - Khaled Jamal Bulbul (32 years old) was prevented from travel to Egypt to participate in the professional safety training course in Cairo, organized by the International Federation of Journalists. Bulbul said that he went to the Rafah crossing on April 19th to travel to Cairo, but the officials in charge of internal security at the crossing told him that he is not permitted to travel, and told him" you have to go to the internal security in Gaza to solve your problems with them". In fact, he went the next day to their headquarters (Al-Mashtal), but they told him that he has no problems, "you may have problems with other apparatuses". The same day he went to the crossing and told the Chairman of the internal security of what they said in (Al-Mashtal), however he told him that his travel is still prohibited.
(April 20) - Ekhbareyyat News network photographer’s car, A’yed Mohareb, was shattered by the settlers in the town of Hewwarah, south of Nablus. Mohareb said that a group of settlers shattered his car windshield and back glass at about 11:00pm. He came out of his house, located on the main street of the town, after hearing a noise outside the house, and when the settlers saw him, they fled by their Subaru yellow number-plate car.
(April 20) - Journalist Murad Abu Al-Baha’, Information Coordinator at the Office of the Islamic Parliamentary Bloc in Ramallah was arrested by the Palestinian preventive security service. A statement by the Office said that Baha’ was arrested from his home in the town of Beitunia, near Ramallah, by the mentioned service, and that he was tortured during interrogation.
(April 21) – Freelance journalist Mustafa Sabri, was arrested by the Palestinian Preventive Security service in the city of Qalqilya. His wife said that a group of the above mentioned force came to their house afternoon, and asked for Mustafa who was in a nearby field outside the house. They have taken his elder son to lead them to the place, but they did not find him there, so she called him asking to come back home where they arrested him. Then they came back at about 09:00pm and inspected the house thoroughly for two hours, confiscated his computer and left the house. ----------------------------- Contact: Mousa Rimawi MADA Coordinator - Ramallah info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com http/:www.madacenter.org
***01.05.09. WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY 2009. All events around the world. Visit the special World Press Freedom Day page on the IFEX website:
***01.05.09. New Study: Global Press Freedom Declines in Every Region for First Time (Freedom House report)
Journalists faced an increasingly grim working environment in 2008, with global press freedom declining for a seventh straight year and deterioration occurring for the first time in every region, according to Freedom House's annual media study. The rollback was not confined to traditionally authoritarian states; with Israel, Italy and Hong Kong slipping from the study's Free category to Partly Free status.
"The journalism profession today is up against the ropes and fighting to stay alive, as pressures from governments, other powerful actors and the global economic crisis take an enormous toll," said Jennifer Windsor, Freedom House executive director. "The press is democracy's first defense and its vulnerability has enormous implications for democracy if journalists are not able to carry out their traditional watchdog role."
Freedom House formally released the findings from Freedom of the Press 2009 in Washington in front of the organization’s giant Map of Press Freedom at the Newseum. The study indicates that there were twice as many losses as gains in 2008, with declines and stagnation in East Asia of particular concern. While parts of South Asia and Africa made progress, overall these gains were overshadowed by a campaign of intimidation targeting independent media, particularly in the former Soviet Union and the Middle East and North Africa.
There were some notable improvements. The Maldives made the study's largest jump, moving to the Partly Free category with the adoption of a new constitution protecting freedom of expression and the release of a prominent journalist from life imprisonment. Guyana regained its Free rating with fewer attacks on journalists and a government decision to lift a boycott on advertising in the main independent newspaper.
Out of the 195 countries and territories covered in the study, 70 (36 percent) are rated Free, 61 (31 percent) are rated Partly Free and 64 (33 percent) are rated Not Free. This represents a modest decline from the 2008 survey in which 72 countries and territories were Free, 59 Partly Free and 64 Not Free. The new survey found that only 17 percent of the world's population lives in countries that enjoy a Free press.
Key regional findings include:Asia Pacific: Cambodia dropped to Not Free status because of increased violence against journalists. Hong Kong slipped to Partly Free as Beijing exerted growing influence over media. China's media environment remained bleak. Media in Taiwan faced assault and growing government pressure. South Asia saw improvements in the Maldives, Bangladesh and Pakistan, while Sri Lanka and Afghanistan suffered setbacks. Central and Eastern Europe/Former Soviet Union: The region suffered the biggest drop in press freedom of any region, with journalists murdered in Bulgaria and Croatia and assaulted in Bosnia. Russia's score declined with the judiciary unwilling to protect journalists from attacks, as well as the frequent targeting of independent media by regulators. Middle East and North Africa: The region continues to have the world's lowest level of press freedom. Restrictions on journalists and official attempts to influence coverage during the Gaza conflict led to Israel's Partly Free status. The Israeli-Occupied Territories/Palestinian Authority saw declines with both Hamas and Fatah intimidating journalists. Iraq saw the security environment for journalists improve and new legal protections for media in the Kurdish areas. Sub-Saharan Africa: Press freedom suffered in Senegal with an increase in both legal and extralegal action taken against media. In Madagascar, media outlets critical of the government were targeted. Other declines were seen in Botswana, Chad, Congo (Brazzaville), Lesotho, Mauritania, South Africa and Tanzania. Comoros, Sierra Leone, Angola and Liberia improved. Americas: Guyana regained its Free rating, while Haiti and Uruguay saw significant improvement. However, Mexico’s score dropped again because of increased violence, the government’s unwillingness to make legal reforms, and pressure on media from local and state officials. Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala and Nicaragua registered major declines. Western Europe: The region continues to boast the world's highest level of press freedom. However, Italy slipped back into the Partly Free category with free speech limited by courts and libel laws, increased intimidation of journalists by organized crime and far-right groups, and concerns over the concentration of media ownership. Greece also suffered a significant decline.
Freedom House has assessed the degree of print, broadcast and internet freedom in every country in the world since 1980. The 2009 ratings are based on an assessment of the legal, political and economic environments in which journalists worked in 2008.
"The declines in East Asia are particularly disappointing, given the increased attention on the region because of the Beijing Olympics," said Karin Deutsch Karlekar, Freedom House senior researcher and managing editor of the study. "China should have had a better record in 2008 and upheld its promise to ensure press freedom during the Olympics, but instead it chose to remain the world's largest repressor of media freedom."
Key trends that led to numerical movements in the study include:Fragile Freedoms: Declines in Israel, Italy and Taiwan illustrate that established democracies with traditionally open media are not immune to restricting media freedom. Over the last five years, a number of emerging democracies have also suffered considerable declines in press freedom including: Mexico, Argentina, Peru, Thailand, the Philippines and Senegal. Consolidating Control: Authoritarian states are increasingly consolidating control of the media. In the last five years, space for independent media shrunk significantly in countries like Russia, Ethiopia and The Gambia. Violence and Impunity: The level of violence and physical harassment directed at the press by both government and non-state actors continues to rise in many countries. Many of these cases go unsolved and these attacks have a chilling effect on media, contributing to self-censorship. Punitive laws: Both governments and private individuals continue to restrict media freedom through laws that forbid "inciting hatred," commenting on sensitive topics such as religion or ethnicity, or "endangering national security." Libel and defamation laws remain a widespread way to punish the press. New media: Freedom House’s recently released internet freedom index finds that new media outlets are often freer than traditional media and have the potential to open repressive media environments such as China and Iran. However, as new media gains influence, governments are beginning to crack down on internet users by employing traditional means of repression.
The world’s worst-rated countries continue to include Burma, Cuba, Eritrea, Libya, North Korea and Turkmenistan. The study found that the level of media freedom in these countries remained stagnant in 2008, despite hope that the internet and new media might provide openings in the media environment.
The methodology and graphics from the survey are available by contacting Laura Ingalls at ingalls@freedomhouse.org or by calling +1-202-683-0909. Full reports for select countries and territories in the study will be available in June.
***29.04.09. INSI calls for practical action by governments to staunch news media bloodshed
Washington, 29 April - The International News Safety Institute on Wednesday laid out a programme of action for governments to help stop the killing of journalists worldwide.
INSI Director Rodney Pinder said too many journalists continued to die trying to provide the world with the news that sustained free societies everywhere.
"The time for more words has long since passed.We hear daily the cries for help and we need to respond with effective action," he told a meeting entitled Dangerous Truth: Safeguarding Journalism and Media Workers at the US Congress called to mark World Press Freedom Day.
"It is entirely appropriate that we take up this subject, of fundamental importance to our democratic freedoms, at the legislative heart of the country which stands before the world as a bastion of free speech..." Pinder said.
"Whenever a journalist dies in the course of their duty, another window closes on the flow of information which fuels good governance, politics and business in an interdependent world."
INSI counts more than 1,300 journalists and other news professionals who have died trying to cover the news in 105 countries since 1996.
Pinder proposed a four-point plan for governments to help staunch the bloodshed:
• Support for the letter and spirit of UN Security Council Resolution 1738 which addresses the safety of news media personnel in conflict and urges an end to impunity for the killers of journalists
• Democratic governments to take a country's record on the murder of journalists into account when deciding aid programmes. "Morally, democracies have no business supporting regimes that encourage or turn a blind eye to murder of journalists," Pinder said. "Practically, corruption negates the best aid programmes unless exposed."
• All government-funded media training projects should include safety training for journalists."Too often media development tax dollars are wiped out by the men with guns," Pinder said.
• Governments must develop a long-term strategic process that puts safety and security at the heart of media development work.
Pinder expressed INSI's support for the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act introduced by the Congressional Caucus for Freedom of the Press. It aims to establish an annual State Department report on the status of press freedom in every country in the world and create a grant programme aimed at broadening and strengthening the independence of journalists and media organisations.
Pearl, a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, was kidnapped and murdered by terrorists in Pakistan in 2002.
"What better way to make the sacrifice of a thousand journalists worthwhile than to help save the lives of a thousand who will go into danger in our name in the years to come," Pinder concluded.
The World Press Freedom Day debate, Dangerous Truth: Safeguarding Journalism and Media Workers, was organised by the Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). It was co-hosted by Senators Richard Luger and Christopher Dodd and Congressmen Adam Schiff and Michael Pence, co-chairs of the Congressional Caucus for the Freedom of the Press.
INSI is a non-governmental organisation established on 3 May 2003 by a unique coalition of news organisations, journalist support groups and humanitarian campaigners concerned by the rising numbers of journalists killed around the world.
Any questions on this news release should be addressed to Rodney Pinder, mobile +44 7734 70926, email rodney.pinder@newssafety.org
***23.04.09. SEEMO/IPI marks tenth anniversary of NATO strike on Radio-Television Serbia (RTS)
Exactly ten years after NATO bombed the headquarters of Serbian state radio and television (RTS), the Vienna based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the International Press Institute, today calls for NATO to ensure an independent investigation into the attack.
On 23 April 1999, 16 media workers were killed when NATO bombs fell on the headquarters and studios of RTS in central Belgrade. Those killed were: Jelica Munitlak (28 years old), Ksenija Bankovic (28), Darko Stolmenovski (26), Nebojsa Stojanovic (27), Dragorad Dragojevic (27), Dragan Tasic (31), Aleksandar Deletic (31), Slavisa Stevanovic (32), Sinisa Medic (32), Ivan Stukalo (34), Dejan Markovic (39), Milan Joksimovic (47), Branislav Jovanovic (50), Milan Jankovic (59), Tomislav Mitrovic (61), and Slobodan Jontic (54).
According to Serbian sources, the media workers who died that day were ordered by the then-management of RTS to remain in the building despite a decision by the government that RTS should evacuate its staff and equipment to another location. In the first step of an investigation by the authorities in Belgrade, Dragoljub Milanovic, the former director of RTS, was sentenced in 2002 to ten years in prison for failing to protect the lives of the 16 RTS employees killed in the NATO strike. However, to this day, NATO has failed to ensure full accountability for this unprecedented attack on a media outlet.
SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic said, "The fact that the Serbian state media was perceived by some as a propaganda tool in the war cannot be used as an argument to justify the bombing of RTS as a legitimate target." Vujovic continued, "SEEMO would welcome a full and transparent investigation by NATO, and urges NATO to admit it was mistaken to target a media outlet, in order to ensure that justice is administered and to finally bring some peace to the families and colleagues of the victims."
Ten Years On, IFJ Says NATO "Must Apologise" over Belgrade Media Killings
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today said that, ten years after NATO forces defied the protests of journalists and human rights groups and bombed a television centre in Belgrade killing 16 media staff, the damage from that unprecedented strike is still being felt. "When NATO forces decided to strike at the television of station RTS in Belgrade because they found its propaganda offensive they set a terrible precedent," said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. "That attack opened the door to a decade of attacks on media in conflict zones and has made journalism more dangerous than ever."
Boumelha says that NATO should admit its mistake on April 23rd 1999 when it targeted the Serbian state broadcaster in its struggle with the regime of Slobodan Milosevic. "The lives lost are gone forever, but an apology from NATO to the families and colleagues of those who died is long overdue," he said.
Only days before the attack, the IFJ had received an assurance from NATO officials that it would not attack media during the conflict over the future of Kosovo. Such an attack is in contravention of international law, warned the IFJ and other press freedom advocates, even if the media concerned are guilty of propaganda. Attacks are only permitted on media when they are actively engaged in the strategic process of war.
But the NATO strike went ahead. Those who died were forced to stay at their posts despite warnings of the attack, raising claims that they had been deliberately placed in danger by the RTS bosses. Following the attack , other assaults on media installations - particularly by the Israeli military which attacked media in Lebanon in 2006 and in the Gaza Strip earlier this year - have been justified by NATO's action.
The IFJ pledged at this anniversary to support journalists in Serbia in their efforts to seek justice for their colleagues who died during the attack and to overcome the legacy of divisive politics which for so long has undermined the profession.
***18.04.09. IRAN. Iranian-American journalist gets eight years on spying charge
Reporters Without Borders “firmly condemns” the eight-year prison sentence which a Tehran revolutionary court passed today on Iranian-American journalist Roxana Saberi on a charge of spying for the United States.
“This conviction was unjust under the Iranian criminal code and the sentence was severe,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Saberi’s lawyer was not with her when she appeared before the judges for the single hearing on 13 April. Coming as it does in the run-up to elections, this sentence is a warning to all foreign journalists working in Iran.”
The Saberi case is the latest example of how the Iranian authorities arbitrarily use spying charges to arrest journalists and tighten the gag on free expression.
Aged 31, Saberi has been detained ever since her arrest in Tehran in late January. The trial opened before a revolutionary court on 13 April and only one hearing was held, lasting a day. Her lawyer, Abdolsamad Khoramshahi, confirmed today to Reporters Without Borders that she has been convicted and sentenced and said he was going to appeal.
Saberi’s arrest was revealed by National Public Radio (NPR) in the United States on 1 March following a call it received from her father on 10 February. The day after the NPR report, the Iranian authorities confirmed she was being held in north Tehran’s Evin prison. On 2 March, foreign ministry spokesman Hassan Ghashghavi said she had been working “illegally” in Iran. Judicial authority spokesman Alireza Jamshidi said on 3 March that she had been “arrested on the order of the Tehran revolutionary court and is now in detention in Evin prison.”
Born and brought up in the United States, Saberi has an Iranian father who became a US citizen. She moved to Iran six years ago, working as a stringer for NPR from 2002 to 2006. She also worked for the BBC and Fox News. The Iranian authorities do not recognise dual citizenship and regard her as an Iranian like any other.
Her father, Reza Saberi, told Reporters Without Borders that she had not worked for the media since 2006. She did not have access to news and information as she did not have press accreditation, he said. “Her writings were just personal notes and comments about cultural and literary subjects with a view to writing a book about Iran,” he said, adding that “she had been concentrating since 2006 on studying Farsi and Iranian culture at a Tehran university.”
***13.04.09. Somali Journalists receive bulletproof jackets and helmets
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ), Thursday, distributed some 20 bulletproof jackets and helmets to Somali journalists for a long time endangered by the unending conflict in the country.
In a ceremony held at Hotel Sahafi in capital Mogadishu, which was attended by Somalia’s first Deputy Prime Minister, Professor Abdirahman Haji Aden, Minister of Sports who is also acting Minister of Information, Suleyman Olad Roble, top leadership of the Somali Clerics Council and the Civil Society, independent journalists and frequently targeted news media organisations in Mogadishu were awarded the equipment- the kind of its nature in the country’s history.
The gesture, in recognition of Somalia being the most dangerous country for journalists in Africa, was courtesy of the Doha Centre for Media Freedom, which had donated 100 bulletproof jackets and helmets to Somali media professionals.
Speaking on behalf of NUSOJ, Ali Moallim Isak, NUSOJ’s Organizing Secretary, said today marked the beginning of the equipment distribution exercise targeting journalists in Puntland and south-central regions of the country.
“These bulletproof jackets and helmets will improve the safety of Somali journalists who are daily threatened by the dangers of flying shrapnel and other dangerous objects as a result of war and violence. We must support our journalists even morally, but above all this is practical solidarity for our colleagues,” said the NUSOJ Organizing Secretary.
***13.04.09. FEPALC CONSIDERA HISTÓRICO FALLO QUE CONDENA A 25 AÑOS DE PRISIÓN A ALBERTO FUJIMORI
La Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (FEPALC), en representación de las organizaciones más importantes del gremio de periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe, hace suya la declaración de su afiliada, la Asociación Nacional de Periodistas del Perú, en relación al fallo histórico resuelto por la justicia peruana, la misma que condenó a 25 años de prisión efectiva al ex presidente Alberto Fujimori Fujimori por delitos de lesa humanidad.
De manera singular, la FEPALC comparte con la ANP su dolor por las violaciones de derechos humanos que entre los años 1990 y 2000 causaron también el asesinato de 26 periodistas, la mayoría de ellos dirigentes y afiliados a la ANP.
La FEPALC considera que la declaración deja precedente de mantener en pie de alerta al gremio de la prensa mundial para combatir la impunidad, prevenir la discriminación, defender las libertades políticas y poner atajo a las atrocidades de toda forma de terrorismo. Celso Schroder - Presidente FEPALC
***08.04.09. The Palestinian center for development & Media freedoms (MADA) - Violations of media freedom in (OPT) during March 2009
The occupied Palestinian territories (OPT) witnessed a number of media freedom violations during the month of March. The Palestinian violations included putting a bomb in front of Al-Jazeera TV’s office in Gaza, firing at “Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah” Newspaper’s headquarters in Al-Berieh city, persecuting “Felesteen” newspaper columnist Isam Shawar as well as Sakher Abu Oun, head of AFP office in Gaza.
Violations committed by the Israeli occupation forces included the injuring of Maan News Agency photographer Khalil Rayash, and Reuters cameraman Bashar Nazzal, the detention of the Quds Net correspondent Mohammad Mahareeq, and attacking Reuters photographer Nayef Hashlamon.
The Palestinian Center for Development & Media Freedoms (MADA) expresses denunciation of all violations against media outlets and journalists, and considers them gross violations of freedom of expression.
MADA is expressing concern over the continuation of Israeli attacks against journalists and the continued house arrest imposed on Al-Alam correspondent Khader Shaheen and producer Mohammad Sarhan, since their release on 15 January, after 10 days under arrest.
MADA is expressing concern about an explosive device left in front of Al-Jazeera’s office and gunshots fired at “Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah” newspaper headquarters for the fourth time in the last few months, which endangers the lives of media workers.
MADA considers the persecution of Isam Shawar by the intelligence service in Qalqilia city for 28 days, as well as the persecution of Abu Oun, the head of AFP’s office in Gaza Sahker by the internal security service in Gaza city, to be a severe violation of freedom of expression. In addition, the expropriation of Abu Oun’s passport and Shawar’s ID card limits their freedom of movement and travel, which is considered a clear breaching of Article 13 of the International Declaration of Human Rights.
MADA demands: The halting of journalists’ persecution and attacks, either by occupation forces or by Palestinian security services, in West Bank & Gaza Strip.The release of all arrested journalists.Journalists and media outlets to be allowed to work freely and safely.
Details of violations: (March 2) - "Felesteen" newspaper columnist Dr. Issam Shawar was summoned by the Palestinian intelligence service in Qalqilia city. Shawar said that from 2 to 20 March he was detained daily for several hours from 10 a.m. until 5 or 7 p.m. in a building under construction. Then they released him and asked him to come back again the next day, at the same time without asking him anything. Since 20 to30 March, he was detained in a cell either individually or with another prisoner until 5 and sometimes to 7 or 9 p.m. On 30 March they gave him his ID card, but he was forced to sign an obligation "not to criticize the political line of the Palestinian authority and its figures". (March 7) – An explosive device was put in front of Al-Jazeera TV’s office in Gaza city. Al-Jazeera correspondent Wael Dahdouh said that one of the office staff received a call from an unknown person at 9 p.m. saying "we want to bomb Al-Jazeera office – the ghosts of Samih Al-Madhoun". After searching they found the explosive device in front of the office, and they called the police, who dismantled it. They also found a written paper saying “If you are thinking of a solution, the solution is to leave - Samih Al-Madhoun ghosts”. (March 19) - The Israeli occupation forces detained Quds Net correspondent Mohammad Ahmad Mahareeq (25 years), near Gilo checkpoint between Bethlehem and Ramallah city. He said that he was preparing a report about the Israeli checkpoints; where there were three checkpoints between Bethlehem and Gilo in that day .He was detained from 9.30 a.m. until 3.30 p.m. They questioning him about his work and the agency that he is working for. They informed him that checkpoints are a closed military area, and he cannot take pictures there. He told them that even according to the Israeli law they do not have the right to detain him, because he is doing his job as a journalist. (March 19) - Sakher Medhat Abu Oun (44 years), AFP office head and the chief of the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate in Gaza, was summoned by the internal security service, which belongs to the Interior Ministry in the dismissed government. Abu Oun said that they questioned him for two hours in the first session about his speech in a media conference in Dubai, and about a training course for journalists in Cairo, also about the financial and material assistance provided by the International Federation of Journalists for a number of journalists and their families in Gaza Strip. In addition, they questioned him about the elections of the Journalists Syndicate, then they asked him to come back again after two days, when they confiscated his ID card and his passport. (March 20) - Maan News Agency photographer Khalil Mohammad Rayash (31 years) and Reuters cameraman Bashar Mohammad Nazzal (29 years) were injured by Israeli occupation forces in Jayous village (Qalqilia). Rayash and Nazzal said that they were deliberately injured in their upper left leg with a rubber bullet by the Israeli occupation forces, while they were covering the weekly demonstration against the apartheid wall in Jayous village. They were treated in UNRWA hospital in Qalqelia, and then they filed a complaint to the Palestinian police against the Israeli forces. (March 27) - The Israeli occupation forces attacked Reuters photographer Nayef Hashlamon in Al-Ma’sara village south of Bethlehem. Hashlamon said that one Israeli soldier’s foot was placed on his leg, and he fell down. Also the soldier aimed his gun towards some journalists (Agence France Press photographer Mousa Al-Sha’er and Reuters cameraman Mohammad Abu Ghaneya) and pushed them back, but an officer got him away, while they were covering the weekly demonstration against the apartheid wall in Al-Ma’sara. (March 30) - “Al-Hayat Al-Jadedah” newspaper’s headquarters was fired upon by an unknown gunman in Al-Berieh city near Ramallah. Its managing editor Bashar Barmawi said that an unknown person fired at the newspaper headquarters at 12:45 a.m., hitting the building without hurting anyone. The policemen who are guarding the building day and night called the security forces, which came at once and started the investigation. Barmawi confirmed that the repeated firing on the building is endangering workers’ lives, and leads to permanent anxiety among them. This is the fourth time that the headquarters was fired upon within the last three months; two of them were in last February. Contact: Mousa Rimawi MADA Coordinator Ramallah info@madacenter.org -madapalestine@yahoo.com http/:www.madacenter.org
***08.04.09. IFJ Calls on Obama to End US Silence Over Injustice of Media Killings in Iraq
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on United States President Barack Obama to intervene over the injustice of journalists killed in Iraq at the hands of the US military. Marking the sixth anniversary of United States army attacks on media in Baghdad on April 8th 2003, in which three journalists died, the IFJ says President Obama must act to investigate a series of killings in the conflict which remain unresolved. In a letter to the US President, IFJ President Jim Boumelha, says the April 8th attack by US forces on Baghdad's Palestine Hotel, which was filled at the time with media staff, "has come to symbolise impunity over attacks on journalists and media staff in Iraq and around the world.
Two journalists, José Couso of Telecinco in Spain, and Taras Protsiuk, a Ukrainian cameraman who worked for Reuters died in the attack and on the same day, US forces attacked the offices of Al-Jazeera in Baghdad, killing reporter Tareq Ayyoub.
Boumelha told President Obama that these attacks have not been independently investigated or properly explained to the satisfaction of the victims' families, their friends and their colleagues. Reports published by US authorities, he said, had failed to thoroughly examine the evidence available and instead merely exonerated US personnel at all levels of command. The Pentagon's November 2004 report on the attack on the Palestine Hotel was, he said, "flawed and unconvincing."
The IFJ has catalogued 16 other cases involving journalists and media staff who have died since March 2003 at the hands of US soldiers. In all of them the families and friends of the victims "wait for credible investigations and honest reports about how and why their loved ones died" said Boumelha.
IFJ national affiliates have also sent letters to US embassies urging US authorities to take responsibility for their part in the deaths of journalists and media staff in Iraq. This year, Boumelha told Obama, journalists "will be encouraged by your vision and plans concerning Iraq which have given hope to millions in this country and across the world."
Boumelha says there should be a review of all the cases and a convincing process of investigation that would "honour your commitment to democracy, human rights and justice. "
***06.04.09. The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) welcomes UNESCO World Press Freedom Prize 2009 awarded posthumously to Sri Lankan journalist Lasantha Wickrematunge
The late Sri Lankan journalist and editor of the Sunday Leader Lasantha Wickrematunge, who was assassinated on 8 January this year, has been named laureate of the 2009 UNESCO World Press Freedom Prize. The Director-General of UNESCO Koïchiro Matsuura today endorsed the choice of the Prizes jury of 14 professional journalists from all over the world.
Jury members were moved to an almost unanimous choice by a man who was clearly conscious of the dangers he faced but nevertheless chose to speak out, even beyond his grave, said Joe Thloloe, President of the jury and Press Ombudsman of the Press Council of South Africa, referring to the laureates posthumous editorial in which he voiced his commitment for press freedom at the risk of his life. Lasantha Wickrematunge continues to inspire journalists around the world, added Mr Thloloe.
Mr Matsuura welcomed the choice of Mr Wickrematunge: In awarding the 2009 World Press Freedom Prize to a committed journalist who opposed war, UNESCO, along with media professionals from all over the world, recognizes the important role that freedom of expression can play in fostering mutual understanding and reconciliation, the theme of this years World Press Freedom Day celebration.
The Director-General will present the World Press Freedom Prize in a ceremony on May 3, World Press Freedom Day, which UNESCO will celebrate this year in Doha, capital of Qatar.
Born in 1958, Lasantha Wickrematunge trained as a lawyer and was a member of the Sri Lankan Bar Association. While working as an attorney-at-law, he began working as an investigative reporter for the Sun/Davasa newspaper.
In 1994, Mr Wickrematunge started the Sunday Leader with his brother and used the publication to campaign vigorously against the war between Sri Lankas army and Tamil rebels.
In 2000, Mr Wickrematunge secured a court victory which led to the abolition of the law that allowed the government to curb the media. In November 2007, the Sunday Leader was damaged in an arson attack that Mr Wickrematunge said resembled a commando action.
Mr Wickrematunge expected to be assassinated and went so far as to write an editorial for publication after his death. It appeared in the Sunday Leader on 11 January 2009, three days after he had been murdered. In his editorial, Mr Wickrematunge voiced his commitment and readiness to die for press freedom: [] there is a calling that is yet above high office, fame, lucre and security. It is the call of conscience.
Created in 1997 by UNESCOs Executive Board, the Press Freedom Prize is awarded annually to honour the work of an individual or an organization defending or promoting freedom of expression anywhere in the world, especially if this action puts the individuals life at risk. Candidates are proposed by UNESCO Member States, and regional or international organizations that defend and promote freedom of expression.
Since its creation, the US $25,000 prize - financed by the Cano and Ottaway family foundations, and by JP/Politiken Newspaper LTD - has been awarded to the following laureates: Lydia Cacho (Mexico, 2008), Anna Politkovskaya (Russian Federation, 2007), May Chidiac (Lebanon, 2006), Cheng Yizhong, (China, 2005), Raúl Rivero (Cuba, 2004), Amira Hass (Israel, 2003), Geoffrey Nyarota (Zimbabwe, 2002), U Win Tin (Myanmar, 2001), Nizar Nayyouf (Syria, 2000), Jesus Blancornelas (Mexico, 1999), Christina Anyanwu (Nigeria, 1998), Gao Yu (China, 1997)
**03.04.09. PAKISTAN - Fact-finding visit by Reporters Without Borders to Swat “valley of fear” - Reporters Without Borders is alarmed about the impact that the imposition of the Sharia (Islamic law) in Pakistan’s northern Swat valley is having on press freedom. Following a fact-finding visit, the press freedom organisation urges both the authorities - federal and provincial - and Taliban leaders to guarantee the freedom and safety of journalists in the region (Read this very interesting report on: www.rsf.org )
***02.04.09AMERICA LATINA - FELATRACS CONDENA ASESINATO DE PERIODISTAS EN CENTRO AMÉRICA Y EXIGE INVESTIGACIÓN INMEDIATA
La Federación Latinoamericana de Trabajadores de la Comunicación social –FELATRACS, expresó hoy, en un comunicado, su condena a los asesinatos de los periodistas Rafael Murguía de Honduras y Rolando Santos, de Guatemala. El comunicado expresa lo siguiente: "La Federación Latinoamericana de Trabajadores de la Comunicación social - FELATRACS, condena de forma enérgica los asesinatos de Rafael Murguía, corresponsal de Radio Cadena Voces, en Honduras, y de Rolando Santiz, periodista de la televisora Telecentro Trece, en Guatemala. Rafael Murguía, fue victimado a balazos por desconocidos, la noche del 31 de marzo. En tanto, elementos no identificados asesinaron la tarde del 1 de abril, a Rolando Santiz, dejando al camarógrafo que lo acompañaba gravemente herido. La FELATRACS, organización comprometida en la defensa y protección de los derechos humanos de los trabajadores de la comunicación social, solicita de de las autoridades judiciales de Honduras y Guatemala, la investigación inmediata para dar con los responsables de tan execrables crímenes. Asimismo, advierte del peligro cada vez más latente de quienes tienen la noble misión de informar en América Latina. La FELATRACS, se encuentra en estos momentos al lado de su afiliada el Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Industria de la Prensa, renovando su voluntad de no cesar en esta lucha por la verdad hasta que no se haga justicia".
GUATEMALA: ASESINAN A PERIODISTA DE TELEVISIÓN EN CIUDAD DE GUATEMALA
Desconocidos asesinaron ayer de varios disparos al periodista guatemalteco Rolando Santiz, quien falleció en un ataque en Ciudad de Guatemala en el que también resultó herido de gravedad el camarógrafo Antonio de León, según informó el portavoz de Bomberos Voluntarios, Mario Cruz. El reportero, empleado de la cadena Telecentro 13, se dirigía hacia su lugar de trabajo cuando varios hombres le dispararon por causas desconocidas. "Falleció de forma inmediata debido a que las heridas fueron en órganos vitales", lamentó Cruz, mientras que el camarógrafo fue trasladado al hospital San Juan de Dios. Santiz perdió el control del vehículo en el que viajaba como consecuencia de los disparos y, además, arrolló algunos puestos callejeros, según informaciones de 'Prensa Libre'. El subdirector de la Policía, Rember Larios, prometió que las autoridades trabajarían para esclarecer el caso, después de que los periodistas se enfrentasen contra las fuerzas de seguridad para pedir una investegación a fondo. Por su parte, el director de Telecentro 13, Juan Carlos Lange, condenó el asesinato de Santiz y dijo de él que era "un buen amigo, un gran compañero". "Una persona incapaz de causarle daño a alguien y que cumplió hasta el final con su tarea periodística", recordó, al tiempo que insistió en frenar la ola de delincuencia que azota al país iberoamericano.
IFJ Condemns Spate of Journalists' Killings in Latin America
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today joined its Latin American regional group, the Federation of Journalists for Latin America and the Caribbean countries (FEPALC) to express its absolute dismay following two murders of journalists in as many days in Central America. According to FEPALC, Rafael Munguia, a correspondent of Radio Cadena Voces in Honduras was shot dead on 31 March by gunmen who fired at him several rounds of bullets, killing him instantly.
The next day on 1 April in Guatemala, Rolando Santis, journalist for Telecentro Trece , was also killed by unknown assailants. His cameraman was seriously wounded in the attack.
"Unfortunately, we are witnessing once again the extreme vulnerability of those who have the mission to inform Latin America citizens," says Celso Schroeder, President of FEPALC. "We demand that governments of this region, especially those of Honduras and Guatemala, conduct a rapid investigation until those who are responsible are identified and their motives discovered. Unless these crimes are solved quickly, impunity will continue to undermine justice in both countries."
FEPALC commits to using all the resources of its affiliates in the region to continue fighting against this type of killings in Latin America, which are as much attacks against the rights of citizens as they are to press freedom and freedom of expression.
"It is the time for solidarity and this demands that all together, we raise both our voices and actions," says Zuliana Láinez, Secretary for Human Rights in FEPALC. "We should stand in front of diplomatic buildings and embassies of the countries concerned to make their governments know, once for all, that when a journalist is killed, the thirst for truth and justice remains".
The IFJ and FEPALC express their total solidarity with colleagues in Honduras and Guatemalan, as well as with the families of the two victims brutally murdered. Our two organizations declare their firm will not to allow these deaths to go unpunished.
***01.04.09.Rapport du représentant régional de la PEC pour l'Afrique de l'Ouest Ibrahima Cissé
Le mois de mars 2009 a été marqué par la nomination du représentant régional en Afrique de l’Ouest et Centrale. La presse sénégalaise, en particulier, s’est montrée très intéressée à cette nomination. Le communiqué de presse annonçant cette nomination a été très largement repris dans les médias (papiers et électroniques : voir recherche dans google.com) de la région, et de nombreux messages de félicitations et de soutien ont été adressés au représentant. Ce qui traduit un intérêt manifeste de la corporation à la PEC.
Activités : La nomination du représentant régional est intervenue dans un contexte de campagne électorale pour les élections locales (élections des maires, président de conseils régionaux et présidents de conseils ruraux) du 22 mars 2009. A cause de la forte mobilisation de la presse (organisations de journalistes, responsables et journalistes reportes) pour l’observation et la couverture de cette campagne, puis du scrutin et de la période post-électorale, le représentant régional n’a pas eu les rencontres de prise de contacte et de courtoisie nécessaires. Il est prévu de relancer les demandes de rendez-vous durant la seconde semaine du mois d’avril, devant coïncider avec la fin du long processus électoral.
Situation des journalistes et des médias : La situation de la presse est restée globalement calme en Afrique de l’ouest et centrale, sauf en Côte-d’Ivoire et en Mauritanie.
En Côte-d’Ivoire : un journaliste de l’hebdomadaire «Le Repère» (proche de l’opposition), Nanankoua Gnamanteh, a été emprisonné du 19 au 31 mars 2009 à la prison centrale d’Abidjan, la Maison d'arrêt et de correction (MAC) pour «Offense au chef de l’Etat». Toutefois, le tribunal a condamné le journaliste à une amende de 20 millions de francs CFA (30.488 euros). La même amende a été infligée au directeur de publication de l'hebdomadaire, Eddy Eugène Péhé. En outre, le juge a prononcé la suspension de l'hebdomadaire Le Repère, proche de l'opposition, pour huit semaines. L’incarcération du journaliste Nanankoua Gnamanteh faisait suite à un article paru dans l’édition du 6 mars dernier sous sa signature, et sous le titre : «Ali Baba et les 40 voleurs». Dans l’article incriminé, il dénonce «neuf ans d'escroquerie politique», «le vol caractérisé, la filouterie et la cleptomanie au sommet de l'Etat ». Le texte est accompagné d’une photo du président Laurent Gbagbo et de plusieurs de ses proches.
Par ailleurs, le quotidien ivoirien, « Nord-Sud », a rapporté dans son édition du 30 mars 2009, avoir « reçu des menaces de morts à travers des appels téléphoniques anonymes », à la suite d’une enquête qu’elle mène sur le meurtre, mercredi 25 mars 2009, d’un enquêteur (auditeur) «dans la filière café cacao». Des mouvements suspects de quatre individus ont été notés le dimanche 29 mars, entre 11h50 et 12h05 à 20 mètres du siège du journal.
Au Sénégal : un seul cas isolé d’agression de journaliste a été rapporté. Ousmane Baldé, correspondant à Kolda (sud-est) de la RTS (Radio télévision sénégalaise, radio nationale) a été agressé par un candidat du Parti démocratique sénégalais (PDS, au pouvoir) à l’élection de maire à Médina-Yoro Foulah (nouveau chef lieu de département situé à 66 km au nord de Kolda). L’agresseur, Amadou Baldé, n’a pas apprécié que le journaliste ait dit dans l’un des reportages la veille du scrutin du 22 mars, qu’il était cultivateur de profession. L’Association régionale des correspondants de presse de Kolda a porté plainte contre le politicien-agresseur.
Durant la campagne électorale, Le Conseil national de régulation de l'audiovisuel (CNRA) avait suspendu deux radios communautaires : « radios Oxy-Jeunes et Afia FM » pour avoir violé la loi électorale, en diffusant des émissions politiques, alors qu’elles n’en ont pas droit, en tant que radios communautaire et non radios commerciales. La mesure de suspension a été levée une semaine après.
Côté mesures : le président Abdoulaye Wade, a annoncé, lors d’une rencontre avec des correspondants régionaux, basés à Tambacounda (Est), son intention de proposer une loi dépénalisant les délits de presse au Sénégal. Cela rendra encore «davantage libre» le journaliste pour son appréciation, a-t-il souligné, indiquant que son souhait est «qu'il n'y aura plus de prison pour les journalistes».
Au Mali : Les organisations professionnelles de travailleurs et d'employeurs du Mali ont signé, jeudi 26 mars, une convention collective fixant désormais les conditions de travail et de rémunération des professionnels des médias, dans le pays.
En Mauritanie : l'Initiative pour la Défense des journalistes (IDJ) a salué la libération d’un journaliste, Abou Abbas Barham, la levée de l'interdiction qui frappait son site d’information en ligne, Taqadoumy. Dans un communiqué, les membres de l’IDJ ont aussi apprécié «positivement les excuses présentées», mardi 17 mars 2009, par les autorités, ainsi que leurs «regrets» exprimés «publiquement», par rapport aux traitements «inconcevables», dont avaient fait l'objet des journalistes de la part des services de l'ordre, au cours d'un sit-in de protestation pacifique contre l'arrestation de Ould Barham, lundi 16 mars devant le siège de la représentation de l’ONU à Nouakchott.
Au Cameroun : Le gouvernement a décidé de la création d’une agence de presse nationale, sous l’appellation de : « Agence Virtuelle Presse » (AVP). La phase pilote durera deux ans : 2009-2010.
En RD Congo : la deuxième édition de la grande conférence des journalistes francophones d'Afrique centrale s’est tenue à Kinshasa, les 20 et 21 mars. Organisée conjointement par la Délégation générale à la Francophonie (DGF) de la RDC, l'Union nationale de la presse congolaise (UNPC) et le Secrétariat général des médias francophones à l’OIF, la rencontre a regroupé les responsables des organes de presse et des professionnels des médias de six pays francophones de l’Afrique centrale : Burundi, Cameroun, Congo, Gabon, République Centrafricaine, Tchad, RDC. Elle avait pour but de réfléchir sur les voies et moyens, susceptibles d’aider à rendre fiables, les entreprises de presse confrontées à d'énormes difficultés.
Perspectives/Agenda : Le 7e congrès de l'Union nationale des journalistes de Côte-d'Ivoire (UNJCI) se tiendra à Abidjan les 4 et 5 avril prochains. Quelque 500 journalistes sont attendus à cet évènement.
***01.04.09. North Korea Must Release Detained Journalists, Says IFJ
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) joins international calls for the immediate release of two American journalists currently detained in North Korea. Laura Ling and Euna Lee, reporters with San Francisco-based Current TV, were arrested on March 17 and accused of illegally entering North Korea by crossing the border from China, local media reports said.
The journalists were in China to report on refugees who had fled the North Korean regime, news reports said.
North Korean's state-run Korean Central News Agency accused the journalists of "illegal entry" and perpetrating "hostile acts" within the boundaries of North Korea.
If convicted, the journalists could face up to 10 years in a labour camp, local media reports said.
"North Korea is a black hole for independent local and foreign media," IFJ General Secretary, Aidan White said.
"The elusiveness of North Korean authorities regarding details of the arrests, detention and welfare of Laura Ling and Euna Lee only underscores the despotic manner in which closed regimes seek to restrict the media and maintain a tight control over information.
"The difficulties in reporting on North Korea, in the interests of its citizens and the wider international community, are echoed in the heavy restrictions on journalists reporting on events in other closed societies such as Burma and Zimbabwe", added White. "But, North Korea is the worst country for freedom of the press, according to Freedom House's 2008 global ranking report."
Some international groups believe the motivation for the detentions is heightened tensions between the United States and North Korea about a proposed test of North Korea's long-range missile technology.
The IFJ urges the international diplomatic community and press freedom and human rights groups to work together for the immediate release of Lee and Ling.
***25.03.09. Getting Away With Murder 2009 CPJ’s Impunity Index spotlights countries where journalists are slain and killers go free
New York, March 23, 2009 -- The already murderous conditions for the press in Sri Lanka and Pakistan deteriorated further in the past year, the Committee to Protect Journalists has found in its newly updated Impunity Index, a list of countries where journalists are killed regularly and governments fail to solve the crimes. Colombia, historically one of the world’s deadliest nations for the press, improved as the rate of murders declined and prosecutors won important recent convictions. The Index | Methodology | Statistical Table | Español | усский “We’re distressed to see justice worsen in places such as Sri Lanka and Pakistan. Our findings indicate that the failure to solve journalist murders perpetuates further violence against the press,” said Joel Simon, CPJ executive director. “Countries can get off this list of shame only by committing themselves to seeking justice.”
CPJ's Impunity Index, compiled for the second year, calculates the number of unsolved journalist murders as a percentage of a country’s population. CPJ examined every nation in the world for the years 1999 through 2008. Cases are considered unsolved when no convictions have been obtained. Only those nations with five or more unsolved cases are included on this Index, a threshold reached by 14 countries this year.
Iraq, Sierra Leone, and Somalia—countries racked by armed conflict—top the Impunity Index. But most of the list encompasses peacetime democracies with functioning law enforcement, nations such as Russia, the Philippines, and India.
Brazil is the sole newcomer to the 2009 index. Although Brazilian authorities have succeeded in prosecuting some journalist murders, those efforts have not offset the nation’s high rate of deadly violence against the press.
CPJ began compiling the index in 2008 to raise awareness about a disturbing pattern of impunity in countries across the world. The organization has undertaken a Global Campaign Against Impunity to seek justice in journalist murders, the world’s gravest threat to free expression, and has focused particularly on unsolved killings in Russia and the Philippines.
This year’s report is being released in Manila to mark the fourth anniversary of the murder of Marlene Garcia-Esperat, a Philippine columnist who reported on corruption in the government’s agriculture department. Garcia-Esperat was gunned down in her home in front of her family in a case that has become emblematic of the struggle against impunity. Two government officials are accused of ordering her murder.
“Philippine journalists are clamoring for justice in at least two dozen unsolved cases, and they need government protection from the murderous thugs who are killing their colleagues year after year,” said Elisabeth Witchel, CPJ’s impunity campaign coordinator. “We call on the Philippine government to take the hard steps needed to gain convictions: assigning sufficient prosecutors and investigators to these cases, moving trials to safe and impartial venues, protecting witnesses, and providing high-level political backing for all of these efforts."
Among the other findings in CPJ’s Impunity Index:All of the countries included in the 2008 Index remained on the list this year. Only slight changes were seen in the rankings and ratings of most countries. Unsolved murders were reported in both Russia and the Philippines in 2008. Both countries have had stubbornly high rates of impunity in journalist slayings over the past decade. South Asian journalists face particularly severe risks. The region’s nations make up nearly half of CPJ’s index. Six are included on the 2009 list: Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India. Even in wartime, journalists are more likely to be targeted and murdered than killed in combat. In Iraq, for example, murders account for nearly two-thirds of all media fatalities. Although conditions in Iraq improved in 2008, authorities there have yet to solve a single murder case involving a journalist. Worldwide, the vast majority of victims are local reporters covering sensitive topics such as crime, corruption, and national security in their home countries.
***24.03.09. THE PHILIPPINES: International journalists' mission tells Arroyo: Stopping killing of journalists could be your legacy
A multinational Southeast Asian journalists’ mission has called on the Arroyo government to intensify efforts to prosecute the killers of journalists and to arrest the suspected masterminds in the 2005 killing of a woman journalist.
“We are alarmed by the continuing killing of media workers in the Philippines and the inadequate measures the government is taking to stop them,” the group said in an end-of-mission statement.
“Given the prevailing sense of urgency in the impunity issue and in anticipation of an increase in the number of journalists being killed as the 2010 presidential election draws closer, we call upon President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to take the steps necessary to prevent that unfortunate development. Madame President, a halt to the killing of journalists as well as political dissenters would be one the enduring legacies you can leave the Filipino people as your term ends.
“We note with concern that despite intensified efforts by civil society and Philippine media groups themselves to convince the government, its law enforcement agencies and the judiciary to address the issue of impunity and the killings, the murders, a majority of which occur in the provinces, have been continuing. An average of five journalists has been killed in the line of duty in the Philippines since 2001 when the Arroyo administration came to power. By the end of February 2009, the count of slain journalists had gone up to 78 since the end of the Marcos dictatorship in 1986, according to statistics compiled by the Philippine-based Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility.”
The Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA) mission, which visited the Philippines from March 21 to 24 to mark the fourth anniversary of the killing of Sultan Kudarat journalist Marlene Esperat, said that while it welcomed the creation of “tracker teams” in the Philippine National Police, the Arroyo administration could still do much more by tracking down the killers of journalists and arresting suspected masterminds.
The tracker teams, said the Philippine National Police in a meeting with the mission, are charged with speedily locating and arresting suspected killers of journalists.
Esperat, who exposed corruption in the regional office of the Department of Agriculture (DA) and in local government, was killed in her home in Tacurong City on March 24, 2005. Her expose of DA wrongdoing has been linked to the 2004 fertilizer scam scandal in which DA funds were allegedly used for the elections that year.
The SEAPA mission was composed of Doung Hak Samrithy, vice president of the Cambodian Association for the Protection of Journalists; Jajang Jalamudin, secretary general of the Alliance of Independence Journalists, Indonesia; Pradit Ruangdit , secretary general of the Thai Journalists Association; V Gayathry, executive director of Center for Independent Journalists, Malaysia; and Kulachada Chaipipat, campaign and advocacy officer, Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA), Bangkok, Thailand, the Head of the Mission.
Based in Thailand, SEAPA member-organizations include the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism and the Manila-based Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility, in addition to Indonesian and Thai journalists’ groups.
The team members expressed fear that the killing and harassment of journalists in the Philippines could spread to other countries unless stopped.
“One of the reasons we came to the Philippines on the eve of the 4th death anniversary of Marlene Esperat was because we believe that the culture of impunity that is deeply-rooted in the Philippines could be replicated in other countries in the region unless there is a common effort to dismantle it in the Philippines. We note an increase in the violence against journalists and media workers in Malaysia and Thailand including browbeating, harassment and mob attacks on individual journalists; surrounding media premises; and the killing of journalists in addition to the use of legal sanctions to silence the media and suppress on-line free expression in 2008.”
“The culture of impunity” refers to the seeming immunity from prosecution and punishment of most of the killers and suspects in the killing of journalists. Only two out of the 78 cases of journalists killed while on duty since 1986 have been partly resolved in that the killers have been tried and convicted. No mastermind, however, has been prosecuted.
Journalists groups worldwide believe that this immunity from punishment encourages further killings.
The SEAPA mission called on media practitioners to adhere to the ethical and professional standards of journalist so as to eliminate one excuse for the killings, and to assure the outrage of the citizenry whenever a journalist is killed. It also called on Filipinos to be involved in the campaign against impunity because every journalist killed deprives citizens of their right to information.
The mission met with the state prosecutor handling the Esperat case; the secretariat of the Philippine National Police’s Task Force Usig (Prosecute); lawyer Nena Santos, private counsel of the Esperat family; some Filipino legislators; and the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists.
CMFR/PHILIPPINES--As the year 2008 ended, another radio broadcaster in Northern Samar was killed by unknown assailants. The killing of Leo Mila of dxSY brought to six the number of journalists/media practitioners killed in the line of duty in 2008. Aside from killings and physical attacks, the Philippine press also faced legal suits and other harassment from government officials and powerful personalities.
The Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) reviewed the state of press freedom in the Philippines, focusing on the killing of journalists and other attacks on the press from January to December 2008. CMFR’s 2008 Press Freedom Report, the third since 2006, also looked at the legal environment for press freedom; problems in prosecuting suspects in the killing of journalists; and the state of media ownership in the country.
The Report looks into these threats as part of the effort not only to record the details of a deteriorating press freedom situation that needs exposure, but also as part of CMFR’s contribution to the campaign to improve respect for and observance of press freedom in the Philippine setting..
***22.03.09. PAKISTAN. Kidnappers threaten to kill journalist Khadija Abdul Qahar if ransom of $2 million is not paid
(PPF/IFEX) - On 18 March 2009, kidnappers holding the Canadian woman journalist, Khadija Abdul Qahar, in Pakistan's North Waziristan tribal agency threatened to kill her if their demand of a $2 million ransom is not met by 30 March.
Qahar, the publisher of a Canadian web magazine, and her two Pakistani guides, Salman Khan and Zar Muhammad, were kidnapped on 11 November 2008 in the town of Miranshah, in the North Waziristan tribal agency of Pakistan that borders Afghanistan, where she was gathering material for a documentary.
A video sent to the Miranshah Press Club on 18 March showed Qahar pleading: "Please help me. Please help me . . . I request the Canadian government, human rights organizations and media associations to accept their demands and get me released otherwise they will kill me."
In previous footage released around the end of February, two militants carrying AK-47 assault rifles were shown standing behind Qahar. On that occasion, she had pointed to the two armed men saying they would kill her if their demands were not accepted.
In the new video, which has been shot in a dark room with a dagger hanging on the wall, the 55-year-old Canadian said: "I am Khadija Abdul Qahar. I am a convert to Islam. I am a Canadian national and am currently being held by the Taliban in some place near the Afghan border, either in Pakistan or Afghanistan, I am not quite sure. I was captured by the Taliban four months ago."
"The previous video was made and distributed to my embassy and the Pakistan government, NGOs and other organisations to try and meet the demands of the Taliban for my release but unfortunately nothing has happened," she added.
"We have a very short time now. I am going to be killed at any time as you can see by the dagger. I am going to be beheaded like the Polish engineer, probably by the end of the month." She was referring to the gruesome beheading of Polish geologist Piotr Stanczak by the Darra Adamkhel-based Taliban on 7 February 2009.
Sher Khan, president of the Tribal Union of Journalists in Bajaur agency, told PPF that they would discuss the matter with the Khyber Union of Journalists (KHUJ) and other media organisations on the line of action they should adopt to help the captive website publisher.
***19.03.09. RDC "Bukavu, la cité des meurtres" : rapport d’enquête sur les assassinats de journalistes dans la capitale du Sud-Kivu (RSF)
Le 18 mars 2009, soit près de quatre mois après l’assassinat de Didace Namujimbo à Bukavu, Reporters sans frontières rend public un rapport d’enquête dénonçant les assassinats de journalistes dans la capitale du Sud-Kivu, à l’extrémité orientale de la République démocratique du Congo.
Le 21 novembre 2008, vers 21 h 30, Didace Namujimbo, journaliste au bureau local de Radio Okapi, a été abattu d’une balle dans la tête, tirée à bout portant, à quelques dizaines de mètres de son domicile. Dix-sept mois auparavant, son collègue Serge Maheshe, secrétaire de rédaction, avait été assassiné, en pleine rue, de plusieurs balles dans la poitrine. Avant ces deux journalistes, dans la nuit du 31 juillet au 1er août 2005, Pascal Kabungulu Kibembi, secrétaire exécutif de l’association Héritiers de la justice et vice-président de la Ligue des droits de la personne dans la région des Grands lacs (LGDL), avait été tué par des hommes armés qui venaient de faire irruption dans son domicile.
Le rapport de Reporters sans frontières identifie les failles du système judiciaire congolais. Enquêtes bâclées, droits de la défense bafoués et procès grotesques garantissent l’impunité aux criminels. En outre, ce document montre que Bukavu est devenue en dix ans de guerre une "favela" des Grands Lacs, où circulent librement armes et trafiquants, et où personne, sauf les potentats locaux, n’est en sécurité. Personne, encore moins les journalistes, dont les enquêtes sensibles ou la réussite perçue comme "insolente" attirent les jalousies et les haines.
Au cours de sa mission menée à Kinshasa, Goma et Bukavu, du 16 au 24 décembre 2008, la délégation de Reporters sans frontières a rencontré des responsables de la Mission des Nations unies en République démocratique du Congo (Monuc), les autorités civiles et militaires du Sud-Kivu, le personnel de Radio Okapi à Bukavu, des journalistes locaux ainsi que plusieurs avocats, dont celui de la famille Namujimbo.
En conclusion de son enquête, Reporters sans frontières recommande notamment au gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo de prendre enfin la mesure de l’échec qu’a constitué le traitement des affaires Kabungulu et Maheshe, et des inquiétudes entourant la manière dont est menée l’enquête sur l’assassinat de Didace Namujimbo. L’organisation demande à l’armée congolaise de se refuser à confisquer les investigations et invite les autorités de Kinshasa à mettre sur pied une commission judiciaire spéciale chargée de faire la lumière sur les assassinats de journalistes et de militants des droits de l’homme à Bukavu.
***16.03.09. TOP UN OFFICIAL CALLS FOR IMPROVING SAFETY FOR IRAQI JOURNALISTS AFTER RECENT ATTACK
New York, Mar 16 2009 10:10AM The head of the United Nations agency tasked with defending press freedom has condemned the recent suicide attack in Baghdad that killed 33 people, including two journalists, and called for measures to ensure safety for media professionals in Iraq.
“Such indiscriminate killings are contrary to every law,” Koïchiro Matsuura, Director-General of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), said in a news release issued today.
Haider Hashim, a correspondent for private TV broadcaster Al-Baghdadia, and cameraman Suhaib Adnan were among the victims of the 10 March attack. Ibrahim al-Katib, a reporter for Iraqi state television, Iraqia TV, was gravely wounded.
“I must, once again, urge the authorities to improve the safety of journalists, a profession of brave women and men whose work is important for society as a whole as it seeks to restore democracy and rule of law. The toll paid by the profession in Iraq is shocking,” the Director-General stated.
The attack brings to 295 the number of Iraqi journalists killed in the country since April 2003, according to the Iraqi Journalists’ Syndicate.
***12.03.09. IFJ Condemns Jail Term for Shoe-Throwing Iraqi Journalist
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has protested over the disproportionate decision of an Iraqi court which sentenced television journalist Muntadhar al-Zeidi to three years in jail for throwing his shoes at former American president George W. Bush in December last year.
"This sentence is hugely out of proportion," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "The journalist made a serious mistake, but it was something that should have been properly dealt with internally and not brought before the courts at all. The Iraqi response is regrettable and we urge that there is clemency and he is released on appeal."
According to media reports from Baghdad, the judge ordered the jail sentence after finding the journalist guilty of assault on a foreign leader. The defence had argued that the charge was inadmissible since Bush was not on an official visit when the journalist hurled his shoes. Their application for reducing the charge to insult also failed.
Muntadhar al-Zeidi, aged 30, a correspondent for the Iraqi-owned al-Baghdadiya TV television station based in Cairo, Egypt, shot to fame in Iraq after he removed his shoes and threw them at President Bush during a press conference in Baghdad with the country's Prime Minister Al-Maliki on 14 December. He has been in detention since he was detained by American security staff and later handed over to Iraqi security services.
The IFJ has called for his release, saying his action was a desperate act to protest over injustice suffered by Iraqi citizens, including journalists, since the US-led invasion and subsequent occupation by the coalition forces. The Federation hopes al-Zeidi will be freed as soon as possible.
"He has already been in custody too long over a matter which is more of embarrassment than of seriously violent behaviour," said White.
***12.03.09. Internet monitored and controlled, even in democracies (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders today issued a report entitled “Enemies of the Internet” in which it examines Internet censorship and other threats to online free expression in 22 countries.
“The 12 ‘Enemies of the Internet’ - Burma, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam - have all transformed their Internet into an Intranet in order to prevent their population from accessing ‘undesirable’ online information,” Reporters Without Borders said.
“All these countries distinguish themselves not only by their ability to censor online news and information but also by their virtually systematic persecution of troublesome Internet users,” the press freedom organisation said. Reporters Without Borders has placed 10 other governments “under surveillance” for adopting worrying measures that could open the way to abuses. The organisation draws particular attention to Australia and South Korea, where recent measures may endanger online free expression.
“Not only is the Internet more and more controlled, but new forms of censorship are emerging based on the manipulation of information,” Reporters Without Borders said. “Orchestrating the posting of comments on popular websites or organising hacker attacks is also used by repressive regimes to scramble or jam online content.”
A total of 70 cyber-dissidents are currently detained because of what they posted online. China is the world’s biggest prison for cyber-dissidents, followed by Vietnam and Iran.
***11.03.09. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) - Violations of media freedoms in OPT during February 2009
There has been a marked decrease of media freedoms violations during the past month in the occupied Palestinian territories (OPT), compared to the precedent month, due to the start of internal dialogue between Palestinian factions, and the non-declared truce between Hamas and Israel.
Violations committed by the Israeli occupation forces included the detention of the Russia Today TV crew in Salfit, and raiding Asia local TV in Nablus.
The Palestinian violations included: the deportation of the Al-Arabiya TV envoy from the Gaza Strip, the arrest of journalist Qais Abu Samra, and firing twice at the "al-Hayat Al Jadidah" newspaper headquarters.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) expresses condemnation of all attacks against journalists and media outlets, calls on the perpetrators to stop them, and asks the authorities to bring those responsible to justice.
Details of violations:
(Feb. 2) – Russia Today TV crew was detained in Salfit city (WB), by Israeli occupation forces. Its correspondent Yafa Mohammed Stety (24 years) said that they were preparing a report about the confiscation of land in the Salfit area, by the occupation authorities for annexation to Ariel, a nearby settlement. An Israeli army patrol stopped them and asked for their identity cards. They were told that photography is prohibited there because it is a closed military zone. They handed the cameraman’s assistant, Ayman Louzi, notification to go to the Israeli Administration in Beit El near Ramallah for investigation. They detained the crew for three hours, and then released them.
(Feb. 7) – Al-Arabiya TV envoy Wael Esam was expelled from Gaza Strip by the Palestinian police. An Al-Arabiya source said a group of Palestinian police officers went to Al-Dira hotel in Gaza city, where Esam were staying, and asked him to leave the Strip immediately. According to Al-Arabiya they threatened to harm him if he did not leave immediately. He left Gaza strip the same day, through Rafah crossing. Al-Arabiya TV was exposed to a campaign by some Palestinians and Arabs on the Internet during the Israeli aggression against the Gaza Strip, accusing it of "cooperation with Zionists to uncover the resistance missiles". In addition, its office in Gaza city was bombed on 22 January 2007, by an armed Palestinian group.
(Feb. 8) – "Al Hayat Al Jadidah" newspaper headquarters was fired upon by unknown gunmen in Albireh city (near Ramallah). The newspaper's editor Hafez Barghouti said that two gunmen opened fire on the door of the printing press and the windows of the headquarters from the garden of a nearby house, at about 12:15am, then they fled, and no one was hurt. The newspaper headquarters was fired upon also on 26 December 2008.
(Feb. 20) - "Al Hayat Al Jadidah" newspaper was fired upon by unknown gunmen in Albireh city. An official in the newspaper said that unknown gunmen fired on the headquarters at 11:15 pm from a relatively long distance. No one was hurt or injured. This was the third time in which the building was fired upon in the last three months.
(Feb. 22) - Jordanian "Alhaqiqah Aldawleya" newspaper correspondent Qais Omar Darwish (aka "Abu Samra") was arrested, by the Palestinian Preventive Security Service in Qalqilya city. Abu Samra said that he was summoned by the service the previous day. He went to their headquarters in Qalqilya at 10 am, and he was investigated five times about his work as a journalist and whether he is working for Aqsa TV, as well as personal and general matters. He was forced to open his email for them. He was released on February 24 in the afternoon.
(Feb. 24) - Asia local TV headquarters was raided by the Israeli occupation forces in the old city of Nablus (WB). Its director Ayman Alqadiri said that a large group of soldiers stormed his home and the TV headquarters in the same building at 12:30 am, and detained his wife and children in a room, while he, his brother and two of the TV workers were detained in another room until 5:15 am. The soldiers closed all the transmitters after breaking into the headquarters, and used the apartment and the headquarters, which are located on the fourth floor of the building, as a point to control the surrounding area. Asia TV was established in 1997. -------- Contact: Mousa Rimawi - Mada Coordinator - Ramallah info@madacenter.org - madapalestine@yahoo.com http/:www.madacenter.org
***06.03.09. SRI LANKA: Free Journalist Detained on Terrorism Charges
365 days after Sri Lankan journalist J.S. Tissainayagam was detained under Anti-Terrorism legislation, ARTICLE 19 joins many people and organisations around the world calling for his immediate release. Tissainayagam, now an Amnesty International Prisoner of Conscience, was detained without charge on 7 March 2008. Following international calls for his release the Sri Lankan authorities finally brought charges against him under the Prevention of Terrorism Act on 25 August 2008 for a series of newspaper articles.
According to journalist and former Convener of the Sri Lankan Free Media Movement, Uvindu Kurukulasuriya, “ Tissainayagam was considered a kind of bridge between the north and south, or the Sinhalese and the Tamils. He has written many articles concerning the ethnic situation in Sri Lanka .”
Dr Agnes Callamard, Executive Director ARTICLE 19 adds “ over the past 3 years more than 14 journalists have been killed in Sri Lanka and many have escaped to India and the West, fearing for their lives. Tissainayagam’s case well demonstrates the threats that counter terrorism legislation and measures pose to freedom of the press, as they are so easily abused. His continued imprisonment for the peaceful expression of his opinion sadly constitutes one of the many violations that are common place in today’s Sri Lanka, including wide censorship, self-censorship, death threats, violence and arbitrary arrests. ”
***02.03.09. IRAN - U.S. journalist held in Iran without charge (CPJ)
The Committee to Protect Journalists called on the Iranian government today to explain why it has held American freelance journalist Roxana Saberi for over a month without revealing her location or charging her with a crime. Saberi, 31, was detained in late January and has not been heard from since, except when she placed a two-minute call to her father from an unknown location on February 10 to tell him that she had been arrested for buying wine, her father, Reza Saberi, told CPJ from his home in North Dakota.Saberi called back 10 minutes later, urging her father not to contact the press, adding that she would be released within days, according to her father and numerous news reports. Her father did not contact the press until Saturday.
"We are extremely concerned about the safety of Roxana Saberi," said CPJ Middle East and North Africa Program Coordinator Mohamed Abdel Dayem. "She has been held for more than a month without charge, which is especially alarming in light of Iran's record of dismal treatment of detained journalists. We call on the Iranian authorities to disclose her location, provide access to an attorney, and explain why she is being detained. Otherwise, she should be released immediately."
In July 2003, Iranian-Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi died in custody, after being detained for three weeks in connection with pictures she had taken during a student protest in Tehran.
Saberi's family and literary agent told CPJ that they believe that the wine merely provided a pretext for detaining the journalist. Press freedom advocates inside Iran echoed that sentiment. People found in possession of alcohol in Iran are usually released within a few days, they said. While the possession or consumption of alcohol is illegal in Iran, it remains widely available on the black market.
Although Tehran refused to confirm or deny that Saberi was being held, Hassan Ghashghavi, spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, today implicitly acknowledged that Saberi was in custody, saying that her activities in Iran since 2006 (when her press credentials were revoked) have been "illegal" and "unauthorized," adding that the case was being handled by the Ministry of Justice, according to multiple international news sources. According to Agence France-Presse, the Iranian judiciary will release more information about the case on Tuesday.
Saberi, who has been living in Iran for six years, filed reports for NPR, Fox News, the BBC, and other international news outlets before her press credentials were revoked in 2006 by the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, which accredits reporters working for foreign news organizations. According to NPR, Saberi continued to file short news items with government permission despite the revocation. Since 2006, Saberi had been primarily involved in writing a book and pursuing a graduate education in Iran, the journalist's literary agent, Diana Finch, told CPJ.
Iran's press freedom record is one of the poorest in the region. At least five Iranian editors and writers, not including Saberi, are currently imprisoned. Detained journalists in Iran are routinely held in undisclosed locations, denied due process, access to attorneys, and timely medical treatment.
***02.03.09. Palestinian Center for Development &Media Freedoms (Mada) Annual Report-summary: 257 Violations of media freedoms in OPT during 2008
Palestinian territories are characterized by the security domination of many factions, which leads to a multiplicity of actors who violate media freedoms: the Israeli occupation forces, the Israeli settlers, the Palestinian security services in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, in addition to armed Palestinian groups. This combination has not only led to a significant decline in the freedoms of expression and freedom of information landscape, but leads journalists and media outlets to practice too much self-censorship, therefore is a setback at the level of the media outlets themselves.
The occupied Palestinian territories witnessed 257 violations of media freedom during the past year. Of those, 147 were committed by Israeli occupation forces and Israeli settlers, 110 by Palestinian security services and armed groups in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. This flagrantly violates freedom of opinion and expression, as guaranteed in article 19 in both of the Palestinian Basic Law and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and other international charters and resolutions of the United Nations, such as resolution 1738 of the UN Security Council in 2006.
It should be noted that Israeli authorities have been committing violations against journalists and the Palestinian media since the beginning of its occupation of Palestinian territories on 5 June 1967, which had increased dramatically during the second uprising, beginning in 2000, during which they have killed more than ten journalists.
The most serious Israeli violations during the last year were: the killing of Reuters cameraman Fadel Shana', who was deliberately shot by soldiers in an Israeli tank on 16 April; the injuring of Basil Faraj, who was seriously wounded on 27 December, which led to his death on 6 January 2009; and the attack on Mohamed Mughier, in which he sustained injuries for which he is still under treatment. Israeli authorities arrested and detained 51 journalists during their coverage of events in different areas.
The army destroyed Aqsa TV headquarters on 28 December, and closed the headquarters of Afaq TV on 10 July in Nablus, Almajd Radio on 11 March in Jenin, Ram FM radio office on 7 April in Jerusalem, and they confiscated their equipment, and equipment from a number of other radio stations which they raided.
The Israeli government prevented journalists from entering Gaza Strip after imposition of the total blockade on 6 November (with the exception of a very limited number), and during the war, which started on 27 December 2008. It must be noted that the occupation forces routinely prevent most Palestinian journalists from traveling freely for more than four decades, which constitutes a continuing violation of article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
They also continued their attacks on journalists covering the weekly anti-apartheid peaceful march in Bila'in for the past four years, and in Nea'lin village, and a number of other Palestinian villages during the last year.
Among various Palestinian elements, the most serious violations were the attempted assassination of “Felesteen” newspaper editor-in-chief Mustafa Alssawaf on 19 June, and the shots on freelance journalist Mustafa Sabri’s home on 6 December, and the headquarters of the “Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah” newspaper by armed Palestinians. These incidents are characteristic of the continuation of security chaos that has plagued the OPT although it was much less than in the past few years.
The Palestinian security services in WB and GS arrested and detained 60 journalists, some of them were arrested more than once such as Mustafa Sabri and Osaid amarneh, others were tortured.
Last year the Palestinian territories witnessed the emergence of legal proceedings, or detention of journalists, accusing them of libel, defamation, and incitement: Hafez Barghouti, Akram Haniyeh, Bahaa al-Bukhari, Isam Shawar, Imteyaz Moghrabi, A’la Taiti, and Osaid Amarneh. Haniyeh al-Bukhari and Barghouti were sentenced to jail, Taiti, Amarneh, and Moghrabi were acquitted, and Shawar was forced to apologize.
Alwatan voice news website was blocked by the Palestinian general prosecutor on 3 November, which was the first Internet blocking in the Palestinian territories, where the Internet is an open space for all to express their opinions freely.
Distribution of three daily newspapers was banned. “Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah”, “Al-Quds”, and “Al-Ayyam” were banned in Gaza Strip since 27 July (“Al-Quds” was allowed to distribute again on 23 August 2008, and “Al-Ayyam” on 12 February 2009, while the ban remained in effect on “Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah”.) Meanwhile “Felesteen” and “Al-Resaleh” newspapers are still banned from distribution in the West Bank since 14 June 2007.
It was observed that the security agencies ignored some the Supreme Court of Justice’s decisions concerning the release of journalists, and sometimes they used the policy of "revolving door", which means to release someone for a few minutes and then re-arrest him.
It should be noted that incitement in media outlets against other local media outlets, and Al-Jazeera TV as well, continued last year. Some public gatherings and marches were banned, and covering other internal events was banned, and some journalists who tried to cover them were attacked by the security services.
The most positive thing during the past year in the area of media freedom was that no journalists were subjected to abduction, for the first time in four years in the Palestinian territories.
All these attacks on journalists and media outlets resulted in a further decline in freedom of expression, which negatively impacted on the development of the Palestinian media and its ability to contribute meaningfully in the political, economic and cultural development, and its ability to shape public opinion in Palestinian society.
We believe that without ending the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, and without putting an end to the sharp differences between Fatah and Hamas, it is difficult to think about a dramatic decrease in violations of media freedoms.
We hope that the dialogues between the Palestinian factions in Cairo will reach an agreement on the Palestinian national unity, which will be reflected positively on freedom of opinion and expression in the Palestinian territories.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada), as part of its objectives to defend media freedoms and the development of the Palestinian media, makes the following recommendations:
• Prohibition of journalists’ detention by the Palestinian security services, and not to involve them in internal Palestinian differences.
• The international community must pressure Israel to stop attacks on journalists and the media.
• Palestinian journalists must commit to professional standards, and not using the media for inciting.
• Formation of a higher council for information, which will be responsible for the official media, to ensure its neutrality and objectivity.
• Respecting the decisions of the judiciary, particularly the decisions of the Supreme Court of Justice on journalists’ issues, by the authorities responsible for law enforcement.
• Prosecuting all those responsible for attacks on journalists and bringing them to justice.
• Amendment of the Press and Publication law which was issued on 1995, to be in harmony with Palestinian Basic Law, and international standards on freedom of expression.
• Allowing all media outlets to work freely and safely in all Palestinian areas.
• Holding regular, democratic and transparent elections for the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate.
Finally, we wish to extend our sincere thanks to the International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX) MENA Outreach Programme and the Foundation Open Society Institute in Switzerland (FOSI), for their support of Mada’s media freedom program.
***20.02.09. PHILIPPINES. Warrant of arrest against suspects in journalist’s slay lifted (CMFR)
CMFR/PHILIPPINES – After losing jurisdiction over the case, a judge recalled the arrest warrant he issued against the suspected gunmen in the murder of a radio broadcaster in General Santos City last 12 February 2009. General Santos City is a province approximately 1, 049 kms southeast of Manila.
General Santos City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 36 judge Isaac Alvero Moran revoked the 3 February 2009 warrant of arrest he had issued against Police Inspector Redempto “Boy” Acharon and several other suspects in the killing of Dennis Cuesta after the case (Criminal Case no. 20846) was transferred to another branch of the same court.
Cuesta died on 9 August 2008, five days after an unidentified gunman on a motorcycle shot him along a national highway near a shopping mall in General Santos City. Cuesta, program director and anchor at the local station of Radio Mindanao Network (RMN), was on his way home from an RMN-sponsored outreach program.
Cuesta sustained wounds in the head and near the spinal column after being shot five times with a .45 caliber pistol.
The case was removed from Branch 36 after the RTC Executive Judge ordered on 11 February 2009 the case be sent back to the Office of the Clerk of Court so that it will “be included in the regular raffling of cases on…February 12” and “be considered as a newly filed case.” RTC Executive Judge Oscar Noel Jr. ordered the re-raffling of the case acting on the accused’s “Very Urgent Motion to Recall Case Raffled to Branch 35 (sic)”..
The case is now assigned to RTC Branch 37 under presiding judge Panambulan Mimbisa, who has yet to issue a warrant against Acharon and the other suspects.
Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ) legal counsel Prima Quinsayas said that the Executive Judge’s decision “to re-raffle the case stripped RTC Branch 36 of its jurisdiction over it. Thus, the warrant of arrest cannot be enforced as it was issued by a judge (Moran) from a court with no jurisdiction.”
FFFJ is a coalition of six media organizations formed in 2003 to combat the killing of and other attacks against Filipino journalists. The Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) is a founding member of FFFJ and serves as its secretariat.
Moran lifted the arrest warrant against the accused saying it was “to pave way for Hon. Panambulan M. Mimbisa, presiding Judge of RTC-37, to make his own finical and evangelical (sic) findings therein.” He further explained in his order that “…the legal basis of its (arrest warrant) issuance has been virtually stripped” since the case is no longer under Branch 36.
Acharon’s lawyer Rogelio Garcia filed the motion to re-raffle the case before the Office of the Executive Judge last 10 February 2009. Garcia claimed that a special raffle to give priority to the murder case filed against Acharon took place on 3 February 2009 even without the proper motion.
Despite disputing the claim of Acharon’s counsel that a special raffle had occurred and saying that there was “no cogent reason to disturb the raffling of the case to Branch 36”, Noel nevertheless ordered the re-raffling to give the accused “peace of mind” over the matter.
Gloria Cuesta, widow of the slain broadcaster, told CMFR that she was shocked by the lifting of the arrest warrant against Acharon. “It was unfair…. Are they trying to delay justice by recalling the warrant of arrest?” Cuesta asked.
Lawyer Quinsayas said the prosecutors need to “be vigilant in following up the issuance of the warrant of arrest.” But she is hopeful that “(t)he re-raffling has removed a possible legal loophole, which accused might take advantage of at a later stage in the criminal proceedings…. One less loophole for Acharon’s lawyer to play up is good for our case.”
The suspects in other media murder cases have used legal technicalities to evade arrest and trial.
The arrest of former police officer Guillermo Wapile, convicted gunman in the killing of Edgar Damalerio, in 2002 was delayed because of typographical errors in the warrant of arrest.
In 2008, the prosecution team handling the case against the alleged masterminds in the killing of Marlene Esperat had to re-file the case at the Tacurong City RTC after the suspects questioned the jurisdiction of the Cebu City RTC over the case. Seventy-seven journalists/media practitioners have been killed in the line of duty in the Philippines since 1986. Only in two cases since 2001 have there been convictions against the alleged gunmen—in the killing of Pagadian journalist Edgar Damalerio and of Sultan Kudarat journalist Marlene Esperat. No mastermind has been convicted.
***20.02.09. GAZA. Journalists Call for Israel to Account for "Premeditated and Precise" attacks on Media in Gaza (IFJ)
The targeting of media by the Israeli military during last month's offensive in the Gaza Strip was "premeditated and precise" and in violation of international law, says the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) in a report published today which calls on the United Nations to investigate the attacks and to take action against the Government of Israel. "There should be no double-talk about this," says Aidan White IFJ General Secretary who led a mission of journalists' leaders into Gaza on January 22. "Here was reckless intimidation of media on a shocking scale that should not go unpunished. If it does, it leaves journalists and media exposed to the threat of attack in any conflict at any time in the future." The mission of journalists' leaders from eight countries, was sponsored by the IFJ and the Federation of Arab Journalists (FAJ) and was joined by the FAJ General Secretary Makram Mohamed Ahmed. It was carried out immediately after the unilateral ceasefire declared first by Israel and subsequently by the Islamic movement Hamas The Mission report, ' Justice in the News: A response to Targeting of Media in Gaza', assesses the violations and threats to media workers covering the Gaza conflict and finds that media were subject to intimidation, direct military assault and were deliberately prevented from working freely during the 22-day military offensive. The Mission report also condemns the blockade of foreign media which had been imposed by the Israeli military on November 5. The ban on foreign journalists was maintained despite an Israeli Supreme Court order of January 2 allowing access to Gaza to a limited number of journalists.
The report cites evidence of media targeting by Israeli forces on 28 December 2008 and the bombing of the offices of Hamas' TV station al-Aqsa in the al-Nasr district of Gaza City; 9 January 2009 and the attack on al-Johara Tower, in Al-Rimal neighbourhood in Gaza City, which was hit twice by Israeli aircraft, even though the building was clearly marked as housing media staff; 15 January 2009 and the attack on the al-Shuroug Tower housing several media groups in Omar al-Mukhtar street , Gaza City, "These actions and the ban on access to Gaza by foreign journalists is evidence of concerted efforts by Israel to intimidate, control and manage media," says the Report which calls for an investigation into violations of Geneva conventions protecting journalists in armed conflicts and disregard for United Nations Security Council Resolution 1738 which in 2006 called on member states to protect journalists in conflict zones. But the report also condemns Hamas for its acts of intimidation of media during and after the conflict. "Threats and intimidation of media continue. There are political attempts to control media by Hamas amidst a continuing atmosphere of lawlessness and threats," says the Report. It further says that Hamas interfered in the work of the Mission. There have also been reports of humanitarian help to media being seized and confiscated by Hamas. The Mission report also makes a series of urgent recommendations for practical humanitarian and professional actions to assist Palestinian journalists including safety training; humanitarian aid to the media families affected by the violence; new efforts to build solidarity between Palestinian journalists in Gaza and the West Bank; and a training programme to combat manipulation of media by Palestinian political factions.
***15.02.09. GAZA. Operation “Cast lead” : news control as a military objective Palestinian journalists caught between Israeli firing and Hamas threats (RSF)
“Set against hundreds of casualties, including many civilians, the toll of violations of press freedom during operation ‘Cast Lead’ in Gaza, might appear small. But news was another casualty of this war. The sealing off of the Gaza Strip, which was the full responsibility of the Israeli authorities, is unacceptable and disturbing. Beyond this conflict, control of news in time of war has become a military objective throughout the world. Now it has become the norm”, said Reporters Without Borders, as it released its report on violations of press freedom during the Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip, in January 2009.
“Hamas is also responsible for serious press freedom violations. Contrary to what its leaders say, journalists are not free to criticise the Islamist movement, to communicate the stance of other factions or simply to set forth divergent opinions. Most journalists who spoke to Reporters Without Borders in Gaza share this point if view, but none of them can express themselves publicly, so great is the risk of reprisals,” stressed the organisation, which has recorded 28 journalists arrested by Hamas forces for their political opinions, since it took control of Gaza in June 2007.
Reporters Without Borders went to Israel and the Gaza Strip at the end of January to establish a tally of press freedom violations during this conflict. After investigating on the spot, Reporters Without Borders puts at six the number of journalists who were killed, two of them while doing their job. Around 15 were wounded. And at least three buildings housing media were hit by Israeli fire.
In the report, Reporters Without Borders strongly condemns all attacks carried out by the Israeli Army against buildings housing Palestinian or foreign media and calls on the Israeli Army and government to rapidly provide detailed explanations for hits on these buildings.
“The United Nations should demand to take part in these investigations and non-governmental organisations should also be involved. Reporters Without Borders now expresses its wish to contribute to this independently. Other investigations carried out by the Israeli Army in the past into the deaths of journalists or bombing of media have had highly reprehensible results, in the process exonerating soldiers of all responsibility”, writes the organisation in concluding its report. Reporters Without Borders believes that, since the launch of the second Intifada in September 2000, the number of journalists killed has reached seven and more than 100 were wounded.
Reporters Without Borders maintains that the closing of the Gaza Strip to the press constituted a serious and unacceptable violation of press freedom. On this too, the organisation strongly urges the United Nations to adopt a resolution immediately calling on Israel to stop using such coercive methods to control news.
The organisation proposes that, with the agreement of the Israeli authorities, press equipment should be sent to the Gaza Strip. This equipment is today sadly lacking : film cameras, tapes, cameras, editing equipment, generators were all damaged or destroyed. Since Israel controls all goods that get into the Gaza Strip, Reporters Without Borders calls on the state of Israel to show discretion in its control of equipment entering the Gaza Strip. Equipment that is essential to the press should benefit from the same conditions as humanitarian supplies.
Download the report “Operation ‘Cast Lead’ : Control of information as military objective” on www.rsf.org
***11.02.09. GAZA.Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) - Violations of media freedoms in OPT during January 2009 - brutal Israeli violations against Palestinian media in Gaza
In January, Israel committed brutal violations against Palestinian media during the aggression on the Gaza Strip, killing four journalists: Basil Faraj, Ihab Wahidi, A'laa Murtaja, Omar Silawi, and wounding seven others: Ayman Alrozi, Mohamed Soussi, Khalid Abu-Shamalah, Mohamed Tanani, Mohammed Madi, Ehab Shawa, and Mannar Shalolah.
Israeli forces also bombed the headquarters of: Aqsa TV, Aqsa Radio, “Al-Resaleh” newspaper, the headquarters of Rantisi printing press, and “Alshouroq” and “Aljawharah”, towers, where a large number of local, Arab and international media offices are located.
The bombing also destroyed and damaged houses and apartments of journalists and media workers: Ashraf Kafarneh, Anas Rihan, Khalid al-Zahar, Adnan Alborsh, Ziad Abu Khoussa, Sameer Khalifah, Hussein Abdel-Rahman, Muhammad al-Jamal, Yusef Atwah, and Ismail Khadir Zanoun.
The continued Israeli bombardment forced “Felesteen” daily newspaper, published in Gaza city, to suspend its publication from the third day of the war until January 19, and “Al-Resaleh” weekly newspaper during the three weeks of aggression.
In addition, there were also violations in the West Bank, which led to the wounding of the journalists Khalil Ryash, Abbas Moumni, and Mohamed Muheisen.
Throughout the war, Israeli occupation authorities prevented journalists from entering Gaza Strip, and even continued to ban entry about a week after the cease-fire, in clear violation of freedom of opinion and expression. The result was that crimes of war were blocked from international public opinion, which forced one-sided coverage, and the result was that coverage by most international media was not objective.
A large group of Israeli journalists and the media played a part in inciting the war on Gaza and called for continuing it thereafter. They imposed a blackout on what is happening in the Gaza Strip, and excessive self-censorship was exercised, in addition to military censorship. This led eight Israeli non-governmental organizations, including B'Tselem and Kishv to send a message to all the Israeli media, criticizing that views critical of the decision to attack, or the conduct of the army during the war, were rarely heard.
More than that, the Israeli journalist Ehud Yaari made accusations against Al-A'lam TV reporter Khader Shaheen, which led to his arrest along with his producer Mohamed Sarhan.
Mada welcomes the order issued by Interior Minister Abdel Razaq Al-Yahya on January 8, in which he stressed the need to respect journalists and facilitate their tasks during the coverage of various events.
Mada denounces the Palestinian security services’ prevention of Solidarity marches and prevention of journalists from covering some of those marches, and attacks on some of them, such as Majdi Ishtiyeh, Najib Farraj and Jamal Aruori. In addition to the campaign of arrests and summons among correspondents of Quds TV (Samer Khuerah, Ahmad Bikkawi, Ibrahim al-Rantisi and Mamdouh Hamamreh), and arrest of WAFA photographer Esam Rimawi, and “Al-Ahram Weekly” correspondent Khaled Amayreh , in the West Bank .
Mada expresses appreciation to all colleagues in the Gaza Strip, who have worked in compelling circumstances, and in light of significant risks, and who were able to convey to the world by word and image over the course of the aggression on the hour.
Mada expresses strong condemnation of the Israeli attacks against Palestinian journalists and media outlets.
Mada: Renews the call for the formation of an independent international commission to investigate the attacks on journalists and media outlets in Gaza strip, and to prosecute those responsible and bring them to justice. Calls upon the international community to put pressure on the government of Israel to stop ongoing violations of freedom of the press in the occupied Palestinian territories, and to force them to pay compensation to the media organizations whose headquarters were bombed, which exceeds $6,000,000. Calls for the local media and international media to be allowed access to the Gaza Strip, completely and freely. Calls on the Palestinian security services to stop attacks on journalists and allow them to operate freely. Details of violations:
(Jan.2) – Reuters photographer Yusri Al-Jamal was attacked by the Israeli occupation forces. Al-Jamal said that he went to cover a march in Biet Ommer town (Hebron). When he arrived there, he prepared his camera, then an Israeli officer rushed at him, pushed him with his hand and said, "Go away from here this is closed military area." Then he took the camera and threw it on the ground, and when Al-Jamal protested, the officer strongly hit him against a wall. Al-Jamal was transferred to the Ahli hospital in Hebron for treatment of bruises.
(Jan.2) – Agence France Press photographer Abbas Moumni was injured by the Israeli occupation forces. Moumni said that he was wounded during his coverage of a Palestinian march near Kalandia checkpoint, north of Jerusalem, by shrapnel from a bullet in the left leg; he was taken to the Sheikh Zayed Hospital in Ramallah to receive treatment.
(Jan.2) – “Al-Ayyam” photographer Jamal Aruori was detained by Palestinian police in Ramallah. Aruori said that he was covering a march in Ramallah city, when the police asked him to stop taking photos, and confiscated one of his cameras. Then he was taken to the police station, where they confiscated his second camera and mobile. After about a quarter of an hour they released him, apologized to him, and returned his confiscated equipment.
(Jan.2) – AP photographer Majdi Mohamed Ishtiyeh (26 years) was attacked by Palestinian military intelligence. Ishtiyeh said that that he was covering a march in Ramallah, when a security man in civilian clothing shouted at him, "stop taking pictures", then he was attacked by two of them, who took him by force to a nearby building, where one of them hit him by his head on his nose, and he lost consciousness. When he woke up shortly after that, they transferred him to the headquarters of intelligence. When bleeding from his nose was renewed, he told the officer in charge he needed treatment, so one of them took him to Ramallah hospital where he was given an initial treatment, and told him that he was suffering a broken nose and that he needed an operation. After several days later the operation to his nose was done in hospital in Nablus.
(Jan.3) - Aqsa TV cameraman Omar Abdel-Hafiz Silawi (28 years) was killed in Beit Lahiya city (GS) after Israeli forces shelled Dr. Ibrahim Makadmeh mosque. His colleague Ibrahim Muslim said that they were covering the Israeli bombing in that area throughout the day, in particular, Kamal Adwan field hospital and the nearby areas. Silawi was filming and transferred videos to the place where the TV was broadcasting, then he transferred his wife to the hospital to give birth, then returned to take his camera and went to the mosque, which is 100m away from the hospital, and when it was bombed, he was seriously injured. "When I saw him on a stretcher sometimes I was filming him and sometimes helping they race him to the hospital,” said his colleague. “I was crying. They tried to treat him but without results. Our comfort is that his wife gave birth safely to a son."
(Jan.3) – “Al-Resaleh” weekly newspaper headquarters was bombed by Israeli military aircraft in Gaza city. Its chief editor Waseem Afifah said that an Israeli Apache helicopter bombed the headquarters of the newspaper in the El Ajrami building with three rockets at about 4:30 pm, which led to extensive damage to the headquarters, the furniture, computers, and electrical appliances. He confirmed that an independent committee assessed the damage with an estimated amount of about $60,000. He mentioned that the paper ceased publication during the aggression. Israeli aircraft also bombed, shortly after that the Rantisi printing headquarters, in which the newspaper was printed.
(Jan.3) – Al-Aqsa TV frequencies were penetrated by the Israeli occupation forces, where they broadcasted propaganda directed against Hamas and the Palestinian resistance factions. It was repeated several times during the aggression. The occupation forces destroyed the headquarters of al-Aqsa Television on December 28, 2008. Al-Aqsa TV head of programs Sameer Abu Muhsen said that the loss resulting from the destruction of the television is estimated at about six million dollars - five million was the price of appliances and equipment, and one million dollars for the construction cost of the five-floor building.
(Jan.4) – Al-Aqsa Radio headquarters was bombed by Israeli aircraft, in Gaza city. Its Director Ibrahim Thaher said that an Israeli Apache bombed the headquarters at around 7pm, which led to the destruction of the building that houses the store of fuel, equipment and standby transmitters. None of the employees was hurt, and the damage was estimated at $60,000.
(Jan.4) – “Al-Ayyam” newspaper correspondent Mohammed al-Jamal’s house was destroyed in Yebna refugee camp south of Rafah city. Al-Jamal said that he was alone in the house when an Israeli drone aircraft fired missiles at around 10 am. "Suddenly I heard a huge explosion, and I felt as if someone threw me from the chair, and on the ground. My head hit the wall and I lost consciousness for a moment". He left the house after that, and the house area was bombed again by two missiles from an F-16, "Then I rushed to the house and found piles of stones and cracked walls and broken roofs."
(Jan.5) Al-A'lam TV correspondent Khader Shaheen and producer Muhammad Sarhan were arrested by Israeli police on the pretext of violating military censorship. His colleague Fares Saraffandi said that journalist Ehud Yaari of Israeli Channel Two TV made allegations against Shaheen, on the grounds that he is an Israel citizen working with Iran (Shaheen has Israeli ID), and that he reported the movement of the Israeli army on Jan.3 at 6:30 pm, while claiming that the army announced the beginning of the operation at 8 pm. Israeli police searched for him the next day in Sederot town, but did not find him. When he learned about it, he went to the police station in Jerusalem on Monday, accompanied by his lawyer, cameraman Ahmad Jalajil and producer Mohamed Sarhan. After three hours of examination, the police asked them to go to the police station in Petah Tikva city (near Tel Aviv). They went there and after two hours of investigation, Shahin and Sarhan were arrested, and Jalajil was released, and they asked the lawyer to leave. They were released on Jan.15 on the basis of the Court's decision, on bail of 300,000 shekels (about $75,000). They are under house arrest and ordered to stop their journalistic work until trial.
(Jan.6) - Algerian TV assistant cameraman Basil Ibrahim Faraj (22 years) died due to a serious injury he suffered in the head on the first day of the aggression (Jan. 27), when Israeli aircraft bombed one of the towers in the Tal El-Hawa neighborhood of Gaza city. A correspondent of Channel Two Moroccan television, Khalid Saeed Abu Shammala (26), who was also with him, said Faraj lost consciousness and was transferred to Shifa hospital, and after several days was transferred to an Egyptian hospital, where he died on Jan. 7.
(Jan.6) - Ramattan News Agency production director Yusef Ahmed Atwa’s house was occupied by the Israeli occupation forces. Atwah said that the Israeli soldiers turned the house in the Israa neighborhood in Gaza city into a military post, until their withdrawal on 18 January, where they vandalized the furniture. Also the house was damaged slightly as a result of the resistance men firing at the soldiers, who were inside the house.
(Jan.7) – “Al-Quds” newspaper correspondent Najeeb Farraj was threatened and verbally attacked by members of the Palestinian police. Faraj said that he saw a group of Palestinian police attacking a young boy, after chasing a group of youths who were demonstrating near Rachel's Tomb in Bethlehem. He prepared his camera for filming, but one of them asked him to shut down the camera, so he closed it, but another one insulted him, then they left the scene, but one of them returned back and threatened him if he published any picture of the incident.
(Jan.8) - Palestinian Public TV cameraman Ihab Jamal Wahidi (33 years), was killed by Israeli occupation forces in the Tower of doctors in Gaza city. His wife Ihsan Abu-Jaber Naja said that she was standing with her husband and her mother Ruqaya Abu Naja on the seventh floor apartment balcony. She said, “We were talking about general matters, when suddenly I heard my husband saying "look" and I saw a shell heading towards us." The shell hit her mother directly, and Ihab was killed immediately and fell from the seventh floor onto the ground. The medical report from the Red Crescent Hospital confirmed his death occurred before he fell from the balcony. She was injured by shrapnel in the lungs and suffered internal bleeding, and she was taken to the nearby Red Crescent hospital to receive treatment. She confirmed that they were targeted because a missile or a shell was fired at the apartment minutes after the first one, although the area had not witnessed any military activity in that period, and whomever shot them knew they were civilians, because they were standing in the open air on the balcony.
(Jan.8) – Editor for Saudi Ekhpareyah TV Manar Shalolah (26 years) was slightly injured in his head when Al-Jawharah (Jewel) tower was bombed by an Israeli airplane. The building is used by Media Group as a place for live broadcast for a number of TV channels, to whom it provides media services. Media Group Chairman Atef Isa said that the bombardment was during the live broadcast for Al-A'lam Iranian TV, and there were also more than twenty journalists on the roof. The bombing was about eight meters from the journalists. He stressed that the Israeli army knows that the surface is used for live broadcasts, where there are press signs, in addition they contacted Israeli army spokesman Afihai Adra’ei and told him about the place since the first day of the war, and he had confirmed that the place would not be bombed.
(Jan.9) - Alwan Radio broadcaster A'la Hammad Murtaja (25 years) was killed after being seriously injured by the bombing of his house in the Zeitoun neighborhood in Gaza city, by an Israeli tank. His colleague Mazen Belbaysi said that Murtaja took leave for two hours and went to his home at approximately six pm when he was seriously wounded in the leg by the bombing of his home. He was taken to Shifa hospital, and died at about 10 pm, while an Aljazeera correspondent was preparing to interview him. His mother was seriously injured in the incident.
(Jan.19) - BBC Arabic producer Ziad Taleb Abu Khoussa’s house was moderately damaged by an Israeli tank shell in the Atatra village (Beit Lahia). Abu Khoussa said that the Israeli occupation forces had shelled the houses adjacent to their home since the first day of the land offensive on 5 December. About a hundred relatives and neighbors had gathered in the shelter of the house, without food or water and, on 9 January, a nearby gas station was bombed, which led to the fire along the wall of the house. They fled it for fear of fire, then three artillery shells were shot at them, which led to damage to the house.
(Jan.9) Maan News Agency photographer Khalil Ryashwas was wounded by Israeli occupation forces in Jayyous village (Qalqilya-WB), which led to injuries in his right leg, according to Maan. He was transferred to Dr. Darwish Hospital in Qalqilya city to receive treatment
(Jan.9) - Associated Press photographer Mohammed Muheisen was injured by the Israeli occupation forces while covering a demonstration near the Qalandya checkpoint north of Jerusalem. Muheisen said that he was hit by a gas bomb in the chest under the heart, and lost consciousness after the impact caused by inhalation of large quantities of gas. He was transferred to the Sheikh Zayed hospital in Ramallah, where the doctors diagnosed a fracture in a rib.
(Jan.10) - Sudanese TV correspondent Sameer Khalifa’s apartment was shelled by the Israeli occupation forces in the Zeitoun neighborhood of Gaza city. Khalifa said that one artillery shell fired by Israeli forces at around 6 am hit the apartment in the fourth floor of the building and caused large damage, but none of his family was hurt, because they had moved to live in his parents’ apartment on the second floor of the same building.
(Jan.13) – The apartments of WAFA agency correspondent Khader Zanoun, and his brother Ismail Zanoun, a Ramatan News Agency photographer, were shelled by Israeli occupation forces in Tal El-Hawa neighborhood in Gaza city. Zanoun said that an Israeli Apache helicopter shelled the two apartments in addition to his parents’ apartment, in the same building on the fourth floor, at about 7:30 pm, causing major damage to the three apartments and furniture, in addition to burning the kitchen of his apartment.
(Jan.13) – Al-Aqsa TV programs director Sameer Abu Mohsen’s apartment, was shelled by Israeli occupation forces in Gaza city. Abu Mohsen said that an Israeli tank shelled his apartment in Tel-Hawa neighborhood in Gaza city at around 4 am, causing significant damage to the apartment. No one was hurt because Abu Mohsen had sent his wife to her family home since the first day of the aggression, and he was at work during the shelling.
(Jan.15) – Abu Dhabi TV cameraman Mohamed Sobhi al Sosi (33 years) and montage technician Ayman Yousef Al-Rouzi (33 years) were injured The Israeli occupation forces shelled the Abu Dhabi TV office in Al-Shoruoq tower in Gaza city. Al -Rouzi said that they were in the office when an Israeli shell hit the office at 11:30 am. He was injured in the head, and Al-Sosi in his left hand, and they were transferred to Shefa hospital and received treatment. Abu Dhabi TV office operates through Gaza Center for Information, which provides media services to a number of Arab television channels and media outlets. The shell also led to the destruction of most of the television transmitters, TV cameras and production equipment, according to a Gaza Center for Information statement. In Al-Shoruoq tower there are also offices of a number of local, Arab and international media.
(Jan.17) - Yemen TV correspondent Adnan Na'man Al-Borsh’s (29 years) home was shelled by the Israeli occupation forces in Jabalia town. Al-Borsh said that the Israeli occupation forces shelled the area with artillery and missiles, which led to partial damage. It is worth mentioning the Yemen TV receives Media services from Ramattan agency.
(Jan.17) - Ramattan agency cameraman Anas Attallah Rihan’s (27 years) home was destroyed by the Israeli occupation forces in Gaza city. Rihan said that he went that day to cover the Israeli artillery bombardment of Al Isra neighborhood of Gaza city, and found that his house was destroyed by artillery shelling. No one of his family was hurt, because they left the house several days ago.
(Jan.17) - Ramattan agency producer Khalid Mahmud al-Zahra's home was shelled by Israeli occupation forces in Mughraqa village south of Gaza city. Al-Zahra said that an Israeli tank fired two shells at the house, which led to significant damage, but no one of his family was hurt because they were sheltering in the next apartment. The house had been shot several times during the war.
(Jan.17) - Ramattan agency cameraman Ashraf Kafarneh’s home was blown up by the Israeli occupation forces in Beit Hanoun city. Kafarneh said that the Israeli forces fired missiles and bullets at the house. His family fled from the house, then the soldiers raided it and then blew it up at about 11 am. The house is composed of four apartments for himself and his brothers.
(Jan.18) – “Al-Ahram” Weekly correspondent Khalid Amayreh was arrested by Palestinian Preventive Security Service in Hebron city. Amayreh said that he was summoned to their office in Dura town. When he went there he was transferred to their headquarters in Hebron city, where he was arrested and interrogated about his recently published articles. The Preventive Security Service said in a statement that the cause of the arrest came because of Amayreh’s incitement and abuse of the Palestinian National Authority and the security services, as well as working on creating discord and differences between Palestinian factions and the Palestinian people, during the aggression on Gaza. He was released after two days of detention.
(Jan.-) - Ramattan monitor Abdul Rahman Mohammed Hussein’s (24 years) house was burned by Israeli occupation forces. Hussein said that they left their home in al-Atatrah village, north of Gaza strip, since the first day of the war, and returned to it after the ceasefire on 18 January. They found the first floor of the house was burnt. It was clear that the soldiers were staying on the second floor. In addition the tanks had destroyed three of the family cars, which were parked in front of the house.
(Jan.24) – Quds TV correspondent Samer Khuerah was arrested by the Palestinian Preventive Security Service in Nablus city. According to Quds TV sources in Ramallah, Khuyrah was arrested after he was summoned for investigation. Members of Preventive Security came to Quds TV office in Nablus two days before, and they interrogated him about his work in Quds TV.
(Jan.26) – WAFA Agency photographer Esam Huda Rimawi was arrested by the Palestinian Preventive Security Service in Ramallah city. Rimawi’s family said that three security officers in civilian clothes and four in uniform came to his office, and asked him to accompany them for a little while. He went with them, where he was arrested. Rimawi works also for other media outlets.
(Jan.26) - Quds TV correspondent in Jenin city Ahmed Ali Bikkawi (30 years) was arrested by the Palestinian intelligence service in Ramallah city. According to Quds TV sources in Ramallah, Bikkawi was summoned to their headquarters, while he was in work mission in Ramallah. he was arrested after arriving at the headquarters in Ramallah.
(Jan.27) - Quds TV correspondent in Ramallah Ibrahim A'hed Rantisi was summoned by the Palestinian military intelligence service. Rantisi said that he was summoned on the previous day by them. After his arrival at 9 am at the security headquarters in Ramallah he was placed in one of the offices for half an hour and then one of the investigators came and took him to another room and blindfolded him and asked him to stand and raise his hands up. After half an hour he brought down his hands because he was tired, but the investigator asked him to raise his hands again. He said he was tired and couldn’t lift them again. After that the investigation began, with him blindfolded, about his work in Quds TV and personal and public issues. He was released at about 2 m.
(Jan.27) - Quds TV correspondent in Bethlehem Mamdouh Mahmud Hamamrah (24 years) was summoned by the Palestinian intelligence service. He went to their headquarters in Bethlehem city at 12 pm. They investigated him about his work in Quds TV, and many personal things. He was released at 2 pm.
***10.02.09.COLOMBIA.Report on the state of the Freedom of Press in 2008 (FLIP)
The Foundation for the Freedom of the Press (FLIP) presents its annual report ''The threat and the stigmatization: Invisible intimidations of the press'' about the state of the freedom of press in Colombia in 2008. The FLIP launches the report today on Colombia's National Day of the Journalist.
The report describes the landscape of the press in Colombia during 2008. In the past year there were 130 violations of press freedom. This represents a decrease of approximately 20 percent compared to 2007, the year in which the FLIP recorded 162 violations.
In 2008 there were no job-related murders of journalists. This is a fact worth emphasizing in a country like Colombia, where more than 130 journalists have been killed in the past 30 years. Despite this positive result, judicial investigations of crimes committed in previous years have made very little progress.
Compared to the prior year, 2008 saw a 15 percent reduction in threats made against journalists. Despite this, threat remains the main method of intimidation utilized against journalists, and the most effective mechanism to curtail the spread of information and prevent certain issues from coming into the public light. Together with the absolute impunity in which judicial investigations of threats against journalists remain, threats have become the silent enemy of freedom of expression.
In the report, FLIP presents some figures about the functioning of the Interior Ministry's Protection of Journalists Program during 2008 and especially emphasizes a recent ruling of the Constitutional Court -- following the lawsuit of one of the beneficieries of the Program -- about the conditions with which the State should proteect the journalist at risk. In short, the Court ruled that the protection of a journalist at risk can not affect his freedom of expression.
During 2008, there have also been some denouncements of journalists who consider themselves to be at risk because of remarks or statements made by public officials and individuals.
Aside the direct threats and other violations of press freedom, last year showed another, more indirect, form of censorship; the arbitrary distribution of state advertising to serve political objectives and exert financial pressure on journalists and media. The report provides an approach to the problem and some of the proposals that are being developed to deal with it.
Another factor that may lead to an indirect form of censorship is the restriction of access to public information. During 2008, FLIP announced certain actions aimed at promoting the right to petition. In one particular case, the Supreme Court of Justice referred to public information and information about military matters. In a ruling that was relevant for investigative journalism the high court ruled that when the Army refuses to give information on the grounds of maintaining national security, it should explain the way in which national security would be compromised by the answer.
***10.02.09. SOMALIA. NUSOJ Expresses Concern over Growing Intimidation and Pressure on Media in Southern Somalia
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is deeply concerned about the disturbing acts from authorities in southern Somalia to restrict the work of journalists and media houses in order to move ahead their political and armed agenda.
In Gedo region, the Islamic administration banned journalists to use in the region video and digital cameras, and warned that they would be “prosecuted” for trying to breach this order. The media in the region was also instructed not to say “Somalia has government”.
Armed politicians who are also against the Transitional Federal Government led by President Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed have been threatening journalists who have been making extensive coverage of the peace talks and the arrival the President in Mogadishu. These politicians are separately pressurising journalists to give them equal coverage with the TFG, but the journalists have been insisting that they cannot overstate individuals that are not familiar in the society or not talking about significant issues for the people.
Radio Markabley, the only Radio station in Gedo region, is still not free to function as directed by its administration and wanted by its journalists due to interferences and restricts from authorities. Parents of women journalists in Bardhere were advised to stop their daughters not to speak from Radio.
The Al-Shabaab administration in Kismayo also imposed on journalists rules to follow to report in Kismayo. Head of the Information of Al-Shabaab Sheik Hassan Yaqub Ali and his deputy Abdifatah Mohamed Ali ordered recently that journalists who report stories their offices are not aware of will be dealt by arresting, expelling from the region or the media house he/she is working for to be banned from the region. Due to stress on journalists, some of the reporters in Kismayu joined the information service of Al-Shabaab as a form of protection for themselves and their families.
“These acts of pressure, intimidations and interferences will hardly divert the media to report important stories and no group or authority will do well to conceal facts on ground,” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
“We urge the government of Sheik Sherif Sheik Ahmed to immediately establish accountability and the rule of law in Somalia,” Omar Faruk added. “We demand the TFG to make clear to members of its armed security forces that discipline will be enforced and violators of media rights will be brought to justice”.
***09.02.09. NEPAL. International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission: Rapid Response Assessment Mission to Nepal
The International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission (also known as the International Media Mission) visited Nepal from 5 to 8 February to undertake a rapid response assessment of the press freedom situation in the country. The International Mission was represented by ARTICLE 19, International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), International Media Support (IMS), International Press Institute (IPI), Reporters Without Borders (RSF), UNESCO and World Press Freedom Committee (WPFC). Press freedoms in Nepal continue to face serious threat despite the hope that restoration of democratic rule would improve the situation.
The Federation of Nepali Journalists (FNJ) recorded a staggering 342 press freedom violations in 2008 alone, including a significant escalation in the number of physical attacks on journalists and media houses. Four journalists - Uma Singh, J.P. Joshi, Birendra Sah and Pushkar Bahadur Shrestha - have been killed since 2006. The International Mission calls on the authorities to undertake prompt, independent and impartial investigation of these and all other cases of murder and disappearances of journalists.
Another journalist, Prakash Singh Thakuri, has been missing since July 2007. Late last year the Government withdrew charges against the accused, who was earlier released on bail. Prime Minister, Pushpa Kamal Dahal, assured the International Mission that the case would be reopened. The International Mission also calls for an investigation into killing of Dekendra Thapa, after his remains were found last year.
The International Mission is deeply worried over the attacks on media houses, including Kantipur, Himal Media, Ankush Daily, Ramaroshan FM and APCA Group. Such attacks on media workers, publications and property are unacceptable. Those responsible must be held accountable for their actions. Any substantive grievances over work conditions must be addressed through dialogue and negotiation.
The International Mission is concerned that due process is not being observed in the cases against Rishi Dhamala, Ram Subhak Mahato, Birendra K.M., Manoj Mahato. The reported kidnapping of Pankaj Das in Birgunj whilst the International Mission was in the country must be swiftly followed-up by the authorities.
The ongoing attacks, threats and harassment of media personnel and organisations are having a chilling effect on press freedom. Free and open debate is being undermined with journalists and media being forced into self-censorship, seriously jeopardising the peace and democratisation process currently underway in the country.
A pattern in the attacks and harassment is discernible. Critical reporting is being met with violence and perpetrators go unpunished. The authorities are failing in their duty to prevent, punish and redress the harm caused by such attacks. The violations of journalists’ rights is a direct infringement of the public right to information. Furthermore, the links between political parties and some the perpetrators of these violent acts are a matter of serious concern and would indicate the acceptance, and possible complicity, of those political parties in the violence. The Nepali constitution and international covenants that Nepal is signatory to place a positive obligation on the State to prevent these abuses.
Conditions for women journalists, already seriously underrepresented in the profession, are of particular concern as they are more vulnerable to attack and harassment, and are being forced to leave their work and sometimes to move away from home due to such pressures.
The International Mission notes that as of now, not one person has been convicted for a criminal act against journalists and media houses, and calls on the Prime Minister and Government to follow-up their commitment to end impunity. Moreover, the International Mission demands that all acts of violence against journalists and the media end immediately.
The International Mission urges the Government and political parties to implement the recommendations for freedom of expression and press freedom outlined in the Agenda for Change document as swiftly and fully as possible. Specifically, the International Mission draws attention to the following six points, which should be addressed in accordance with international standards and best practice:
Guarantees of freedom of expression for all and press freedom must be enshrined in the new constitution; The Right to Information (RTI) Act should be properly enforced so as to give practical effect to the presumption in favour of disclosure; The Government should end control of media and introduce Public Service Broadcasting; An independent regulator for broadcasting should be created in place of direct government control; Criminal defamation should be abolished and defamation should be addressed only through civil law; The Working Journalists’ Act should be implemented and accompanied by regular dialogue between media workers and owners. Furthermore, the International Mission urges the Constituent Assembly to form a committee to deal with the reforms outlines in the Agenda for Change , as well as to follow and respond to the press freedom situation in the country.
The International Mission is convinced that all media stakeholders must rally around the common goal of safeguarding freedom of expression. The International Mission urges the international community to support the national media community in its efforts to defend press freedom.
The International Mission remains committed to supporting and defending freedom of expression and press freedom in Nepal together with its national partners.
FURTHER INFORMATION: • The International Mission travelled to Nepal in February 2009 with only two weeks notice on the request of the Federation of Nepali Journalists and other members of the Nepali media community. The International Mission met with the Prime Minister, Ministers, Constituent Assembly, leaders of Government and opposition political parties, heads of security agencies, media, and civil society organisations. Mission members also visited Janakpur in Dhanusha District, where the journalist Uma Singh was murdered on 11 January 2009.
The International Mission incorporates fifteen international organisations, including UN agencies, global media associations, freedom of expression advocates and media development organisations. This is the sixth visit of the International Mission to Nepal, the previous trips being in July 2005, March 2006, September 2006, January 2008 and April 2008.
***04.02.09. SOMALIA. Prominent Somali Journalist Assassinated in Mogadishu
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) strongly condemns today’s brutal assassination of Said Tahlil Ahmed, Director of HornAfrik Radio in Mogadishu at around 14:45 hrs local time.
Three men with pistols shot Said Tahlil Ahmed four times at the heard in Bakara Market while he was with other directors of Radio Stations in Mogadishu as they were summoned by Al-Shabaab Islamic group for a meeting, according to one of the Directors who did not want to be named for security reasons. Due to this killing the directors could not attend the meeting that they were summoned.
“This is a outrageous and appalling assassination” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. “Said Tahlil Ahmed was assassinated because of his strong and professional commitment for independent journalism”.
Said Tahlil Ahmed was courageous, veteran and well-respected journalist. “Somali journalists community have lost today a leading journalist who was killed by enemies of press freedom with the intention of instilling fear in the hearts of journalists”, Omar Faruk declared.
“Enough is enough, the government of President Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed and the International community have to act swiftly to end targeted violence against journalists” Omar Faruk appealed.
Said Tahlil Ahmed is the second journalist killed in Somalia since the start of the year. Hassan Mayow Hassan of Radio Shabelle was the first journalist killed in the world in this year as he was killed on 1st January.
***04.02.09. The IFJ Says Impunity and "Callous Indifference" Remain Threats as New Wave of Media Killings Wipes out Optimism Over Death Toll in 2008
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today issued its report on the killings of journalists in 2008 with a warning that 2009 could be the deadliest year yet for journalists. A wave of killings in the first days of the new year have undermined hopes that the falling death toll recorded in 2008 was the first sign of a change in the pattern of killings which have risen dramatically in recent years.
"The welcome relief brought about by the decline in the killings of journalists in 2008 has been shot lived;" said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary at a press conference to launch the report entitled ' Perilous Assignments: Journalists and media personnel killed in 2008'. "Ten colleagues died in January alone and from all regions of the world either in targeted killing or as a direct result of their work."
The IFJ recorded 109 deaths of journalists and media staff in 2008, marking a decrease from the 2007 all time record of 175 deaths.
The IFJ says that the international community still needs to step up to confront the challenge of impunity in the killing of journalists. "We often see politicians, even in democratic countries showing callous indifference to the threats posed by attacks on journalists and media. That must end," said White.
According to the report, Iraq remains the most dangerous countries despite a substantial drop of media casualties from 65 in 2007 to 16 last year. The other dangerous zones were Mexico and India with 10 deaths each.
The IFJ says the culture of impunity for crimes against journalists and the systematic failure to respect the rights of journalists deny journalists the protection they are entitled to in their work, especially during armed conflict.
"The recent conflict in Gaza provides a powerful example of the dangers facing journalists" added White. "Media personnel and installations were targeted by Israeli military, causing casualties, including two fatalities and extensive damage to property."
The IFJ was the first press freedom advocacy group to call for an investigation into the Israeli targeting of the media during the conflict in Gaza and is gathering information for a report on these attacks which will contribute to the investigation.
"Israel must be held accountable for the violations of international law and the international community, including the European Union, must enforce effectively provisions for the protection of journalists and media staff, especially Resolution 1738," White said.
The IFJ report also indicates that the organisation's Safety Fund contributed in 2008 over 100.000 Euro in humanitarian assistance grants to more than two dozens families of killed journalists and journalists in need. The Fund is also contributing to humanitarian efforts to help journalists as part of the IFJ Solidarity campaign launched in the wake of the Israeli attack on Gaza.
"The Safety Fund, created and funded by journalists to help colleagues in need is a shining example of solidarity in action," added White. "Through this Fund, journalists or their families, who otherwise would have been left to fend for themselves after tragedies such as accidents or the death of a bread winner, have been given a lifeline to help find their feet again."
***29.01.09.UN HUMAN RIGHTS CHIEF DEPLORES DETERIORATING SITUATION FOR CIVILIANS IN SRI LANKA GENEVA -- The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said Thursday she was deeply concerned by reports of the rapidly deteriorating conditions facing a quarter of a million civilians trapped in the conflict zone in northern Sri Lanka, and of alleged human rights abuses and a significant number of civilian casualties, as well as the huge displacement.
Ms. Pillay also expressed concern at the highly restricted access to the Vanni region for aid agencies and impartial outside observers, including journalists and human rights monitors.
“The perilous situation of civilians after many months of fighting, multiple displacements and heavy rains and flooding is extremely worrying,” Ms. Pillay said. “The lack of access for independent monitors, humanitarian workers and the media only adds to concerns that the situation may be even worse than we realize,” she added.
The High Commissioner cited reports of forced recruitment, including of children, as well as the use of civilians as human shields by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). She also condemned the fact that safe zones promised by the Government have subsequently been subjected to bombardment leading to civilian casualties.
“People trying to flee the conflict areas are reported to have either been prevented from doing so, or to have been arbitrarily detained in special centres,” she said. “It seems there may have been very grave breaches of human rights by both sides in the conflict, and it is imperative that we find out more about what exactly has been going on. It is also urgent that civilians in the north can find safe shelter, away from the fighting.”
Ms. Pillay noted that along with the Secretary-General and other heads of UN agencies, she had already expressed her concerns directly to the Government of Sri Lanka. “We are all seriously alarmed by the situation,” she said, “as are many of the NGOs and other organizations operating in Sri Lanka.”
Ms. Pillay said the conflict had reached a critical stage: “While the Government has made military gains on one hand, the rule of law has been undermined on the other. The killing of the prominent newspaper editor Lasantha Wickrematunge earlier this month was the latest blow to the free expression of dissent in Sri Lanka. The searing article he wrote prophesying his own murder is an extraordinary indictment of a system corrupted by more than two decades of bloody internal conflict.”
The High Commissioner observed there had not been any successful investigations or prosecutions of political killings, disappearances and other violations committed in recent years.
“It is the Government's duty to provide safety to all Sri Lanka's citizens, whatever their ethnic origin or political views,” Ms. Pillay said. “That means not only protecting civilians during military operations in the north, but also ensuring space for journalists and human rights defenders to seek out the truth and expose abuses.”
Ms. Pillay added that “a strenuous effort needs to be made to tackle the core problems that have fuelled this conflict for a quarter of a century, in order to bring peace and prosperity and restore fundamental rights and freedoms for all Sri Lankans in all parts of the country.”
***27.01.09. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) demands a halt to the policy over the detention of journalists and demands, Sky and BBC to broadcast Gaza aid appeal
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) expresses concern over the renewal of arrests of journalists in recent days by the Palestinian security services in the West Bank, where they arrested today morning Al-Quds TV correspondent in Ramallah Ibrahim Rantisi, its correspondent in Jenin Ahmad dikawi yesterday, and its correspondent in Nablus Samer Khuerah on January 24.
They also arrested WAFA Agency cameraman yesterday (January 26), Al-Ahram Weekly correspondent Khalid Amayreh, was arrested on January 18 in Hebron city, and was released two days later.
Mada Center condemns the renewable concedered violations of freedom of opinion and expression, Mada demands the Palestinian national authority to put an end to the policy of detention of journalists, and the release of all arrested journalists in the past three days, in addition to Fareed Hammad who was arrested on July 29, 2008, and Iyad Srour who was arrested on October 14, 2008.
Meanwhile, Mada demands BBC and Sky News to broadcast Gaza aid appeal, because the failure to broadcast the appeal raises big question marks over their neutrality and impartiality.
***26.01.09. UNESCO CHIEF DEPLORES MURDERS OF JOURNALISTS IN RUSSIA, VENEZUELA New York, Jan 26 2009 3:10PM The head of the United Nations agency tasked with upholding press freedom condemned the killings of journalists and a lawyer in Russia and Venezuela, underscoring that these murders are a contravention of human rights.
Journalist Anastasia Baburova and human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov were shot dead on 19 January while having a conversation outside a Moscow metro station. Mr. Markelov, who had just given a press conference, is believed to have been the target of the attack. Ms. Baburova worked for <i>Novaya Gazeta<./i>, the same newspaper as investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya, who was assassinated in 2006.
Also slain in Russia recently was Shafiq Amrakhov, owner and editor of the online regional news agency RIA 51 in Murmansk in the country’s north-west. He was shot inside his apartment and died six days later.
“These killings represent a tragic blow to the basic human right of freedom of expression and to all other human rights, which are essential if good governance and the rule of law are to be upheld,” said UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO
***25.01.09. IFJ and FAJ Call for Urgent Action to Protect Journalists after Tour of War-torn Gaza
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the Federation of Arab Journalists and a number of journalists' leaders from Europe and the Arab world have concluded a two-day emergency mission to Gaza with a call for urgent action to improve the safety of journalists and media in the region.
"The Israeli army has left the scene after three weeks of turmoil and tragedy in which media have been in the firing line," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "But the threats and intimidation of media continue. We need to take urgent action to protect Palestinian journalists."
The mission met with local journalists' leaders, talked to media personnel injured and caught up in the fighting and toured media sites bombed by Israel during the conflict. The mission says a comprehensive package of measures is urgently needed including:
Safety training and material for the protection of journalists; Humanitarian aid to the media families affected by the violence; A full investigation by the United Nations of targeting of media by Israel in violation of international law; Measures to encourage solidarity among Palestinian journalists in Gaza and the West Bank and to assist the Palestine Journalists Syndicate; Support for professional actions to counter undue political influence of media in the region which are affected by sectarianism which has divided the West Bank and Gaza.
"Israel has much to answer for and must be held accountable by the international community," said White. "But we must take action now to ensure that journalists are protected and that political attempts to control media and journalism are ended."
The IFJ says that the Hamas and Palestinian Authorities must stop interfering with media and must allow journalists to work freely.
"In Gaza we found evidence of intimidation by Hamas. This is completely unacceptable. We understand that humanitarian help to media including safety vests for journalists in danger have been seized and confiscated. This is intolerable," said White.
"All sides must take their hands off the media and allow journalists to work freely without any form of intimidation."
The IFJ and FAJ also decided to support a detailed investigation to determine whether Israel has violated international law, including Security Council Resolution 1738 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict.
The international mission was led by Aidan White and Federation of Arab Journalists General Secretary Makram Mohamed Ahmed, who is also President of the Egyptian Journalists' Union. Other members of the mission are: Nikos Megrelis(EIAS, Greece), Patrick Kamenka (SNJ-CGT, France), Kjetil Haanes (NJ, Norway), Paolo Serventi (FNSI, Italy), Omar Mousa Al Shnaikat (JPA, Jordan); Anne Poulsen (IMS, Denmark), Hatem Zakariya (FAJ, Egypt).
The IFJ and FAJ agreed to put in place mechanisms which will support and contribute to the unity of journalists in Palestine. "Journalists in Palestine have been victims of sectarianism and divisions," said White. "Now they must forge unity and harmony and keep self-serving politics out of the newsroom."
The IFJ thanked the FAJ for their prompt response to an appeal for joint action over the Gaza crisis and said the two organizations are committed to building professionalism in journalism in the region. The two organisations also agreed to consult over plans for a second mission involving leaders of journalists' unions in the coming weeks.
***22.01.09. IFJ Praises Courageous Journalists as Mission Enters Gaza
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today led a multinational delegation of journalists' unions from Europe and the Arab world into Gaza, only hours before Israel finally opened the area to the world press
The aim of the mission, says the IFJ, is to support local journalists and to investigate the problems facing media during the conflict.
The IFJ, which has condemned vigorously Israeli targeting of media and the blockade on journalists entering Gaza over the last month, today also condemned Hamas for its threats and intimidation of journalists.
"We commend local journalists for the courage they showed in the face of deliberate and, in many cases, deadly attacks," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary and head of the international mission to Gaza. "We strongly support the call of the Secretary General of the United Nations for the respect of international law during armed conflict and it is time for Israel and Hamas to be held to account for serious violations of international law in this conflict."
The IFJ also decided to support a detailed investigation to determine whether Israel has violated international humanitarian law, including Security Council Resolution 1738 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict.
The international mission was organised jointly with the Federation of Arab journalists, including its General Secretary Makram Mohamed Ahmed. Other members of the mission are : Nikos Megrelis(Greece), Patrick Kamenka( France), Kjetil Haanes ( Norway), Paolo Serventi(Italy), Omar Mousa Al Shnaikat (Jordan); Anee Poulsen ( Denmark, ) , Hatan Zakariya(Egypt), Mohamad Noul Farhat( Egypt), Imad Attiya(Egypt) and Salah Maqsud(Egypt)
"The last month has been hell for journalists working in Gaza, "said Aidan White. "It is impossible to properly investigate the media situation in Gaza without considering the difficulties facing journalists, particularly because of the Hamas regime. It is clear that Hamas are no friends of media freedom and have been ruthless in their intimidation and manipulation of the media. The situation of journalists in Gaza was already intolerable without military activity and this latest conflict has not made it any better. Now that the violence has stopped, it is time for all sides, especially Hamas to allow journalists to work freely."
The IFJ is working with the Federation of Arab journalists to put in place mechanisms which will support and contribute to the unity among journalists in Palestine.
"Journalists in Palestine have been victims of sectarianism and divisions," said White. "They must stand aside these and forge unity and harmony for the good of journalism in Palestine."
***21.01.09. SRI LANKA. Global media rights groups condemn "culture of impunity and indifference" in Sri Lanka
The International Press Freedom Mission today condemned a "culture of impunity and indifference" over killings and attacks on journalists in Sri Lanka. Since the beginning of the New Year, both the killing of a senior editor and the attack on the facilities of a popular independent TV channel have led to a total paralysis of the media community.
Launching a new report, "Media Under Fire: Press Freedom Lockdown in Sri Lanka", the International Mission criticised the Government over its inaction and failure to take the attacks, murder and assassination of reporters seriously. This has in turn led to an almost total blackout of independent and objective reporting from the North and East of Sri Lanka, which have seen the worst of the country’s long-running civil war.
"In all the cases of attacks against media and assassinations of reporters there are few serious investigations by the authorities and none of the killers are ever brought to trial," said the International Mission. "A hostile environment of intolerance propelled forward by the top political leadership has created a culture of impunity and indifference making every day hunting season for attacks on media staff."
Based on its visit to Sri Lanka in October 2008, the International Mission noted three trends relating to the coverage of the conflict: lack of press access and independent information flow in the conflict zones; a wave of assaults and intimidation of journalists covering the conflict; and self-censorship by the media on the realities of the war.
Since the International Mission took place, the situation for media has continued to deteriorate in Sri Lanka. On 6 January this year the studio of the Maharaja Television/Broadcasting Network (MTV/MBC) was attacked by armed gunmen. On 8 January, Lasantha Wickrematunga, editor of the Sunday Leader, was shot dead by two men on a motorcycle as he drove to work in Colombo. On 15 January, police began a widespread search for MTV Channel 1 Chief Chevaan Daniel after accusations of him being behind the attack on his station.
According to the findings of the International Mission, reporters and editors conveying messages that are critical of the government’s war against the LTTE are labeled as "traitors" and "terrorists" where they work in an increasingly hostile environment of censorship and fear.
The International Mission is shocked at the repeated instances of elected representatives and Government Ministers using violent and inflammatory language against media workers and institutions. Not surprisingly this has led to widespread self-censorship among journalists in order to protect their lives.
"The killing of Lasantha and the deaths of at least 8 other journalists along with 2 disappeared since 2007 illustrates in painful detail just how journalists and media staff continue to suffer for their profession," said the International Mission. "Without a proper investigation into Lasantha’s assassination and the attack on MTV, there will be no chance at all for the government to claim that it assumes responsibility to guarantee the basic safety and independence of media," said the International Mission.
We urge the Government to accept the creation of an international and independent commission to investigate the two recent attacks in line with requests by Sri Lankan journalists and media institutions. As a group, the International Mission will offer its assistance to form this commission and to participate in the investigation.
***20.01.09. RUSSIA: double murder another blow for human rights
The shocking murders of the lawyer Stanislav Markelov and the young journalist Anastasia Barburova on Monday brings Russia’s human rights record to a new low. The crime is compounded by the knowledge that Russia has a culture where impunity reigns and murderers are rarely brought to justice. Even in the case of a journalist as famous as Anna Politkovskaya, after a rare two-year murder investigation it is the alleged accomplices who are on trial – while the murderer remains at large. Stanislav Markelov was well known for his work as a human rights lawyer, particularly in Chechnya. Markelov represented the family of 18-year-old Kheda Kungayeva, who was murdered by Yuri Budanov - the first senior officer to be convicted of human rights abuse during the Chechen campaigns. Markelov had announced that he would be challenging Budanov’s early release last week.
Those who are brave enough to expose human rights abuses in Russia risk their lives. Over the past few months, victims have included Umar Israilov, a Chechen who claimed that he had been tortured by President Ramzan Kadyrov and had filed a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights. He was shot dead in Vienna last week. Last November, Mikhail Beketov, a local newspaper editor, was assaulted in the Moscow suburb of Khimki and left in a coma. Beketov had been a fearless critic of the local administration. Last summer, Magomed Yevloyev, who owned the website Ingushetia.ru and also bravely exposed abuses, was shot dead in a police car as he was being taken away for questioning.
All these cases represent a striking and widespread level of lawlessness. We would like to remind the Russian authorities that as a State Party to the European Convention on Human Rights, Russia has agreed to secure the human rights of all within its jurisdiction, including the right to life and to freedom of expression.
ARTICLE 19, English PEN and Index on Censorship call on the Russian authorities to do everything in their power to bring those responsible for the murders of Stanislav Markelov and Anastasia Barburova to justice – and to demonstrate the will to address the continuing culture of impunity.
***19.01.09.VENEZUELA - FEPALC EXIGE RESPUESTA CONTUNDENTE ANTE ASESINATO DE PERIODISTA
La Federación de Periodistas de América Latina y el Caribe (Fepalc) expresó su profunda preocupación por la seguridad física de los periodistas en Venezuela, tras el asesinato de Orel Sambrano, editor del semanario político ABC, vicepresidente de la estación regional Radio América 890AM y columnista del diario regional Notitarde, quien fue baleado a quemarropa por dos hombres que lo interceptaron en una motocicleta. Tras repudiar con energía el crimen ocurrido el último viernes 16 de enero, en Valencia, en el estado de Carabobo, la Fepalc instó a todas sus organizaciones afiliadas en la región a movilizarse solidariamente ante las dependencias diplomáticas de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela a fin de exigir al Estado venezolano asumir el compromiso de garantizar la libertad de expresión, como responsabilidad indelegable de los estados, en su condición de tales. La hostil relación del gobierno venezolano con los periodistas y de los partidarios de gobierno y grupos violentistas, quienes han declarado “objetivos militares” a los comunicadores sociales, coloca a Venezuela en la funesta lista de países con climas extremadamente adversos para el ejercicio del periodismo. Si bien a la fecha, es confuso el móvil del asesinato, no se ha descartado que el mismo haya tenido vinculaciones con el quehacer periodístico de Sambrano. El periodista había escrito sobre casos de narcotráfico, uno de los cuales implicaba a los hermanos Abdala, Alex y Basel Makled, quienes fueron arrestados en posesión de unos 400 kilogramos de cocaína durante un allanamiento de la propiedad de la poderosa familia el 14 de noviembre. Por ello, la Fepalc exige una investigación inmediata, en la que garantizada la independencia, permita identificar a los responsables y condenarlos conforme a ley.
COLEGIO NACIONAL DE PERIODISTAS ACLARA QUE NO PUEDE VOLVERSE UNA COSTUMBRE ASESINAR A PERIODISTAS
El presidente del Colegio Nacional de Periodistas (CNP), William Echeverría, alertó que "no podemos acostumbrarnos a que maten periodistas en Venezuela", luego de exigirle al Ministerio Público y a las autoridades policiales una respuesta contundente donde se identifiquen a los autores del asesinato del comunicador social y abogado, Orel Sambrano, hecho ocurrido la tarde del pasado viernes. "Exigimos respeto y protección frente al trabajo, porque están comenzando a matar periodistas en Venezuela", indicó. Indicó que el primero de enero se acabó con la vida del periodista y reportero gráfico Jacinto López y resultó herido su acompañante el gráfico Ricardo Marapacuto en el estado Lara, en un hecho atribuido al hampa común, luego se produjo un atentado contra el periodista Rafael Finol, del diario El Regional, quien la semana pasada resultó herido de un balazo rasante en la cabeza. En estos dos casos no están establecidos los móviles. "Y ahora este trágico hecho que enluta al gremio de los periodistas el asesinato de Orel Sambrano", dijo. Esta posición la fijó el vocero del CNP nacional durante una rueda de prensa que ofreció junto a los miembros de la Comisión Nacional para la Protección de Periodistas (Conapro), la cual con menos de 24 horas de haberse instalado el pasado viernes en la ciudad de Caracas, se trasladó este sábado a Valencia para sesionar sobre este crimen.
IFJ Condemns Violence against Media in Venezuela after Murder of Journalist The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is deeply concerned about the spiraling violence against media in Venezuela after a second journalist is murdered since the beginning of the year.
"January has been a fatidic month for freedom of expression in Venezuela," said Gregorio Salazar, Director of IFJ Latina America Office. " Two journalists have been murdered, another survived an assassination attempt and a string of criminal attacks and serious violations of press freedom have been perpetrated including the decision of the National Congress ( Asamblea Nacional) to deny TV crews access to the Parliament room as was the practice."
Orel Sambrano, Director of Radio America , the weekly ABC and a senior columnist of the daily Notitarde based in the city of Valencia in Carabobo state was killed on 17 January by gunmen on a motorbike who shot him several times. Sambrano had received death threats for reporting on drug traffic cases. His death has shocked media community and the general public in Venezuela.
Another young graphic reporter, Jacinto López, was killed on January 1 and his partner and fellow graphic journalist Ricardo Marapacuto injured in the city of Barquisimeto, State of Lara, in an attack that was blamed on the general criminality.
Rafael Finol, journalist with the daily El Regional , was shot and slightly injured on the head last week at the entrance of the said paper. Reasons for these two incidents remain unclear.
The IFJ condemns the attitude of law enforcement authorities for their failure to act against the behavior of violent groups, allegedly identified with government sectors which publicly declare journalists and communication professionals as military targets.
"If the behavior of these violent groups is not investigated and the law enforced, tragedies like these will continue to happen ," added Salazar.
The IFJ expresses its solidarity with the journalistic community in Venezuela and supports their demands for serious, firm and transparent investigations of all of theses cases. It also calls on the government to guarantee the exercise of journalism in conditions of security and for the respect freedom of expression and right to be informed .
***19.01.09. UNESCO CHIEF SPEAKS OUT AGAINST BRUTAL MURDER OF NEPALESE JOURNALIST, ACTIVIST New York, Jan 19 2009 9:10AM The head of the United Nations agency tasked with defending press freedom has condemned the murder earlier this month in Nepal of Uma Singh, a journalist and activist, characterizing the killing as “a blow to Nepalese society as a whole.”
Ms. Singh, 26, was a reporter at Radio Today FM and member of the Women’s Human Rights Defenders in the southern district of Dhanusha. She was attacked on 11 January in her own home in Janakpur, over 200 km from the capital Kathmandu, by 15 men who attacked her repeatedly with “khukhuris” – curved knives traditional to Nepal.
“If Nepal is to uphold the two basic human rights of freedom of expression and equal rights of men and women, it will need to bring the culprits of this crime to justice,” said UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura.
The slain journalist, who also worked for the daily newspaper Janakpur Today, was noted for her articles criticizing the dowry system, a widespread tradition in the Asian nation, whereby families pay large sums of money and give land to men their daughters marry.
Last week, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal (OHCHR-Nepal) urged Nepal Police to identify those responsible for Ms. Singh’s death and bring them to justice.
It stressed that taking urgent action will send a strong message that there will be no impunity for attacks against the media, calling on all segments of Nepalese society to respect the freedom of opinion and journalists’ rights.
The murder of Ms. Singh is the latest in a troubling trend of attacks targeting media professionals in Nepal over recent months.
“Occurring amid a growing number of reports of incidents targeting journalists throughout Nepal, this tragedy should galvanise those responsible for protection of media freedom to take the necessary action to ensure the security of journalists,” said OHCHR-Nepal Representative Richard Bennett in a press release issued on 12 January.
Last October, several people reportedly raided the office of the local Terai Times newspaper in Janakpur, where they assaulted staff and damaged and stole equipment after the publication of a news article suggesting that the Young Communist League (YCL) was providing protection for prostitution.
In another incident, a journalist from a daily newspaper in Nepalgunj informed OHCHR that he had been verbally abused and threatened on 21 October by a local government official of Banke district, following publication of an article that alleged financial irregularities linked to a local construction project. Jan 19 2009 9:10AM
***16.01.09. Gaza: ARTICLE 19 Condemns the Israeli Military's Continued Targeting of Media Personnel in Gaza and Supports International Calls for a UN investigation into the Attacks
ARTICLE 19 strongly condemns Israel’s continued unlawful attacks on Gaza, including the shelling on January 15 of a United Nations compound containing essential aid supplies and the targeting of a building hosting several media offices, resulting in the injury of two media professionals.
In an escalation of Israeli attacks on media professionals, a missile or shell hit a Gaza tower block home to Reuters and other international media organizations on January 15. The 13th floor of al-Shurouq Tower struck the offices of Abu Dhabi television injuring one of its journalists and a Reuters cameraman.
ARTICLE 19 also strongly condemns Israel’s detention of two Palestinian journalists working for the Iranian Al-Alam television station in Ramallah on January 5, 2009. Hadir Shaheen 34, and Mohammed Sarhan, 26 were arrested in Jerusalem on charges of broadcasting information on the deployment of Israeli soldiers into Gaza which was subject to ‘military censorship.’
More than 1000 Palestinians have so far been killed and more than 5000 are injured. Among the killed, more than 300 are children and hundreds more are wounded.
The continuous ban of foreign media entering the Gaza strip and the severe attacks on media personnel in Gaza is evidence of the Israeli authorities’ determined attempts to control and manage the news coming out of Gaza . “The denial of access to Gaza for journalists prevents the important circulation of essential information on the plight of those most in need” said Dr. Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19’s Executive Director.
“History and experience have stressed the importance of protecting a free flow of information about conflict situations so as to expose any abuses that may occur and create a climate in which the conflicts may be resolved. Media freedom must be respected, not restricted, if peace is to be won” added Dr. Callamard.
Media workers benefit from the full protection granted by international humanitarian law to civilians, in both international and non-international armed conflicts. Journalists are considered civilians under Article 79 of Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions, provided they do not do anything or behave in any way that might compromise this status. Any deliberate attack on a journalist that causes death or serious physical injury is a major breach of this Protocol and deemed a war crime. This protection under the Geneva Convention was reiterated by Security Council Resolution 1738 concerning the protection of journalists and media personnel in conflict zones.
ARTICLE 19 supports urgent international calling for a UN-led investigation into a range of attacks in which civilians were killed or injured, and civilian buildings were destroyed. ARTICLE 19 in particular calls for the international investigation to include the targeting of media professionals in Gaza and the shelling of media buildings.
A19 calls on the international community to implement UN Human Rights Council resolution (A/HRC/S-9/L.2) adopted on January 12, 2009, which, among other matters calls for “Free access of media to areas of conflict through media corridors” into Gaza.
***15.01.09. GAZA. IFJ Plans Investigation into Violations of Press Rights after New Assault on Media in Gaza
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has today announced that it plans to organise a wide ranging investigation into Israeli actions against media during the current conflict in Gaza after another building housing media organisations was struck this morning by Israeli missiles.
"We are witnessing in Gaza unprecedented and deliberate attacks on media which put journalists and others in harm's way," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "There have been a string of such actions, and a concerted effort to ban, control and manage media, all of which demands full investigation."
The IFJ says it will support a wide ranging investigation particularly into the use of military force against media, which is a serious violation of international law and counter to Security Council resolution 1738 which provides protection of journalists and media personnel in conflict zones."
According to numerous press reports, the Ash- Ash-Shuruq Tower, a building housing several news organisations, including Reuters, NBC, Fox News, Sky News, Al-Arabiya and Abu Dhabi in downtown Gaza City was hit by an Israeli missile today.
Two journalists, Muhammad As-Susi and Ayman Ar-Rezi working for Abu Dhabi were injured in the attack
The IFJ has since the outbreak of the current conflict repeatedly denounced attacks on media by Israel in Gaza which have claimed five lives of journalists and protested its ban on foreign journalists to enter Gaza.
"This latest attack against the press is irrefutable proof that Israel pursues a clear strategy of intimidating the world media, including by wilfully killing and injuring journalists, into desisting from reporting independently on the conflict," added White. "This is a dangerous departure form universally accepted rules for prosecuting war which must be denounced and resisted."
The IFJ calls on all media organisations with presence in Gaza or information on attacks against the media in the area to contribute to the investigation by sharing information in their possession with IFJ.
***15.01.09. GAZA. Mada: Israeli occupation forces targeted Abu Dabi TV injuring two journalists
The Israeli occupation forces shelled Abu Dabi TV office in Al-shoruoq building in Gaza city this morning, two journalists were injured: Mohamed Sobhi al Sosi (33 years) and montage technician Ayman Yousef Al -Rouzi (33 years). Al -Rouzi said that they were in the office when an Israeli shell hited the office at 11:30 am, he was injured in the head, and Al-Sosi in his left hand, they were transferred to Shefa hospital and received treatment, their situation is stable.
The Palestinian Center for Development & Media Freedoms (Mada) strongly condemns this new attack against Palestinian journalists and media outlets and demands th international society to pressure Israeli government to stop targeting Palestinian journalists and prosecute those responsible of this crime.
***15.01.09. Israeli military asked to explain how Gaza media building came to be hit by explosion (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders calls on the Israeli military to investigate and explain exactly how a 16-storey building in Gaza City that houses several news organisations including Reuters came to be hit by an explosion this morning.
An Abu Dhabi TV journalist and a Reuters cameraman were injured in the blast that shook the Al-Shurouq Tower. It was not immediately known whether the explosion was the result of a missile or a shell fired by a tank.
Reuters said an Israeli army spokesman contacted the news agencys Jerusalem bureau shortly before the explosion to verify the location of its Gaza bureau. Reuters had informed the Israeli army of the exact location at the start of the war and was assured by the Israelis on several occasions that it would not be a target.
Reporters Without Borders has written to the Israeli army high command asking it to shed light on the circumstances of todays incident. The press freedom organisation points out that, under international humanitarian law, news media must be given the same protection as civilians.
***15.01.09. GAZA. INSI Gaza safety advisory
Brussels, 15 January - The International News Safety Institute today launched a Gaza safety advice service on its website:
This is aimed at providing the news media with a running update from the ground of safety-related information during the crisis.
Any news organisation or individual with useful information to contribute to this service should email INSI Director Rodney Pinder rodney.pinder@newssafety.org or Deputy Director Sarah de Jong sarah.dejong@newssafety.org
***13.01.09. GAZA. Mada welcomes HRC resolution to open safe passage for journalists and calls for pressure on Israel to apply it
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) welcomed the resolution of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations yesterday, demanding the opening of safe passage to journalists in the Gaza Strip.
Mada thanks all the countries who voted in favor of the resolution, and Press Emblem Campaign (PEC), and the International Covenant to Protect Journalists, which called for the adoption of this resolution in a statement on 7 December. It is indeed a historic decision, and will have a positive impact on the work of journalists in various parts of the world.
Mada believes the importance of the resolution also stems from the fact that it should put pressure on Israel, which continues to prevent the media from entering Gaza Strip since the imposition of the blockade on 4 November 2008, except for a small number. Israel has fully prevented journalists from entering since the beginning of the brutal war in the Gaza Strip on 27 December 2008, even though dozens of crews from international media had came to cover the war.
Israel is not only preventing journalists from entering Gaza, but has imposed strict military censorship on them. In that context they arrested Ala’lam TV correspondent Khader Shaheen and producer Mohammad Sarhan on 5 January, accusing them of a breach of military censorship, and an Israeli court renewed their detention yesterday.
Mada Center calls upon the international community to put firm pressure on the Government of Israel, which is not tired of describing itself as an oasis of democracy in the Middle East, for the implementation of this resolution, and to allow the media to enter the Gaza Strip and to secure safe passage for them, and to stop its attacks on journalists and media outlets. ---------------------------------- Contact: Mousa Rimawi - Ramallah - Mada Coordinator info@madacenter.org
***13.01.09. Gaza: ARTICLE 19 Welcomes UN Human Rights Council Resolution Calling for Free Access of Media to Gaza and Condemns Israel’s Targeting of Media Professionals
ARTICLE 19 welcomes the UN Human Rights Council resolution of 12 January which calls for “Free access of media to areas of conflict through media corridors” into Gaza and strongly condemns the IDF’s (Israeli Defence Force) targeting of media professionals there. The nature of the conflict and dangerous security situation has placed very severe restrictions on the ability of both Palestinian and international journalists to report freely from Gaza.
Since the start of the Israeli offensive on 27 December five media professionals have been killed, including Basil Ibrahim Faraj. Basil, an Algerian assistant cameraman for the Palestinian Media and Communications Company, died when his crew came under fire on the first day of the military campaign.
On January 9, the clearly marked Al-Johara Tower in Gaza city, home to the offices of numerous international media organizations, was targeted by the IDF resulting in the injury of one journalist and the damage of satellite communication equipment. On January 5, the IDF bombed the offices of the Hamas-affiliated Al-Risala newsweekly agencies and on December 29 the headquarters of Al-Aqsa TV were shelled, destroying communication facilities and forcing the station to broadcast from mobile facilities.
The ban of foreign media entering the Gaza strip and the severe limitations placed on the movement of journalists within Gaza is evidence of the IDF’s attempts to control and manage the news coming out of Gaza.
‘It is imperative that foreign media professionals are allowed entry into Gaza and that those currently in the conflict zone are able to report freely and impartially on the situation there, including the humanitarian cost and disaster.’ said Agnes Callamard Executive Director for ARTICLE 19.’
ARTICLE 19 therefore urgently calls on Israel to immediately adopt operative paragraph 6 of the Human Rights Council resolution issued on January 12 which “Demands further the occupying Power, Israel, to lift the siege, open all borders to allow access, free movement of humanitarian aid to the occupied Gaza Strip, including the immediate establishment of humanitarian corridors, in compliance with its obligations under International Humanitarian Law and to ensure free access of media to areas of conflict through media corridors.”
ARTICLE 19 also calls for Special Procedures mandate holders to be granted unrestricted access to Gaza and the West Bank to conduct investigation and fact findings.
“The news black out must be put to an end. The people of Gaza must be given their chance to tell their story to the world and the world has a right to know what is occurring in Gaza. The presence of impartial human rights reporters and investigators is essential to break the censorship walls.” adds Dr. Callamard
***13.01.09. GAZA. More than 100 media sign the Reporters Without Borders petition for international journalists to be allowed into the Gaza Strip (RSF)
With 100 news media signatures now on the petition it launched on 9 January, Reporters Without Borders reiterates its appeal for support by the international media and again urges the Israeli authorities to lift the ban on foreign media access to the Gaza Strip that has been in force since November. Allowing journalists into the Gaza Strip would be the best way to ensure independent coverage of the events unfolding there.
The only news coverage of the situation in Gaza comes from the 295 Palestinians who are working for a range of news organisations in extremely difficult and dangerous circumstances. Reporters Without Borders express its solidarity with all these media employees and deplores the deaths of four journalists since 27 December, three of them in the course of their work. The four journalists are Basel Faraj, Ihab el-Wahidi, Omar Silawi and Alaa Mortaji. Reporters Without Borders offers its sincere condolences to their families.
Since the Israeli supreme court ruling on 31 December that foreign journalists should be allowed into the Gaza Strip in groups of 12, the Israel Defence Forces have permitted a very small number to enter. Reuters and the BBC were allowed to cover the activities of some Israeli soldiers for a few hours. The other journalists have been condemned to wait in Sderot or the hills that overlook Gaza.
“Dignity,” a vessel chartered by the Free Gaza organisation carrying medical personnel and journalists, was driven back twice by the Israeli navy when it tried to approach the shore of the Gaza Strip.
The campaign must continue against the blockade imposed on the international media by Israel.
News media that are interested in signing the appeal are asked to contact us at: gaza@rsf.org
***12.01.09. GAZA. ISRAEL SHOULD ALLOW MEDIA INTO GAZA TO REPORT ON WAR, UN AGENCY SAYS New York, Jan 12 2009 12:10PM The United Nations agency entrusted with defending the freedom of the press, condemning the fatal wounding of a journalist on the first day of the Israeli offensive against Gaza, today called on Israel to allow local and international media professionals to report on events in the area.
UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura cited UN resolutions forbidding attacks on journalists and media installations and calling on Member States to reaffirm their commitment to the principles of freedom of the press and freedom of information.
He deployed the killing of Basel Faraj, a cameraman for the Algerian TV network ENTV and for the Palestine Broadcast Production Company, who died on 6 January from wounds sustained during an Israeli air strike on 27 December.
“Basel Faraj has paid for his dedication to his profession with his life,” he said in a statement, highlighting the importance of respecting the right of journalists to exercise their professional duties and keep the world informed about what is taking place in Gaza.
Last week UN Under-Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information Kiyo Akasaka called on Israel to ensure immediate access for international media into Gaza, stressing the need for “full and independent” coverage of events there.
“Access to objective and factual information is of vital importance at all times, and plays a particularly important role in emergency situations,” he said in a letter to Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Gabriela Shalev. Jan 12 2009 12:10PM
***12.01.09. GAZA. IFJ Launches Gaza Solidarity Campaign: Calls for UN Action Over Targeting of Media
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on the United Nations to investigate targeting of media by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip and to take action against Israel where it has violated international law and a Security Council resolution on protection of media in conflict zones. The IFJ has called on all of its affiliates, regional organisations and other journalists' groups in the region, including the Federation of Arab Journalists, to support the call which is part of a number of solidarity actions launched by the IFJ today.
The IFJ is calling for the establishment of an international Gaza Journalists' Defence Committee and has launched an appeal for humanitarian assistance to support the families of media victims. The IFJ says that four media staff have died as a result of Isreali action in Gaza in recent days.
In a letter to all IFJ affiliates, the IFJ announced that a Gaza Safety Fund account has been opened for donations towards further humanitarian aid to the victims of violence in Gaza. In a letter to Ban-Ki Moon, United Nations Secretary General, IFJ leaders , President Jim Boumelha and General Secretary Aidan White, say: "Israel is violating international law, ignoring its own Supreme Court and showing contempt for the United Nations by defying its obligations under Resolution 1738 to protect journalists in conflict zones."
The IFJ claims that Israeli military have made targeted attacks on media on two specific occasions - on December 28 when Israeli aircraft struck the television station Al Aqsa and on January 9 when there was a double air strike on the Al-Johara Tower in Gaza City, a building was clearly marked as housing media staff and where up 20 news organisations were based.
The IFJ demands that the blockade on forein media entering Gaza must end and any talks to guarantee a ceasefire and a peaceful solution to the present conflict must include guarantees on the rights of media to move freely and to end all forms of intimidation of journalists. Initially, if humanitarian corridors are to be created, these must also allow the free movement of journalists, according to IFJ.
***10.01.09. GAZA. Mada: the occupation forces killed two journalists and injured three in the last two days
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) strongly condemns the continuation of the Israeli occupation forces attacks on journalists and media outlets, in the context of the brutal war on Gaza Strip, which has been going on since 27 December, and which caused killing of more than 800 people, and more than three thousand injured, and enormous devastation and Humanitarian disaster, in addition it continued attacks on Journalists in the West Bank.
Alwan Radio broadcaster A'la Hammad Murtaja (25 years) died yesterday evening, after being seriously injured by the bombing of his house in the Zeitoun neighborhood in Gaza city by an Israeli tank. His colleague Mazen Belbaysi said that Murtaja took leave for two hours and went to his home, where he was in at approximately six pm was seriously wounded in the leg by the bombing of his home, he was taken to Shifa hospital, and died at about 10 pm, while Aljazeera correspondent was preparing to interview him. his mother was seriously injured in the incident.
Israeli warplanes also carried out on the day before yesterday bombed flat Palestinian Public TV cameraman home Ihab Jamal Whidi (33 years) in doctors Tower in Gaza city. Journalist Khader Zaa’nun said that Whidi was killed as result of injury in different parts of his body based on interview with Wahidi wife, who was seriously injured in the incident. Whidi mother in law Ruqaya Abu Naja was killed in the same Incident, she is Moroccan. The latest death brings the number of journalists and workers in the media, who have been killed since the beginning of the war to four.
Israeli aircraft also bombed Sunday evening Jewel tower wall surface, which is used by Media Group as a place for live broadcast, for a number of TV channels , which it provides media services to them. Manar Shalolah (26 years) was slightly injured in his head and was taken to a private hospital to receive treatment. Media Group Chairman Atef Issa said that the bombardment was during the live broadcast for Al-A’alam Iranian TV, and there were also more than twenty journalists in the surface, the bombing was about eight meters from the Journalists. He stressed that the Israeli army knows that the surface used for live broadcast , where there are press signs, in addition they contacted Israeli army spokesman Afaihai Adra’ei and told him about the place since the first day Of the war, he confirmed that the place would not be bombed.
Maan News Agency stated that its photographer Khalil Ryashwas was wounded by Israeli occupation forces in Jayyous village (Qalqilya-WB), which led to Injuries in his right leg. He was transported to Dr. Darwish Hospital in Qalqilya city, to receive treatment.
Yesterday also, the Associated Press photographer Mohammed Mheisen was wounded by the Israeli occupation forces during his coverage of a demonstration near Kalandia checkpoint, North of Jerusalem city. Mheisen said that he was hit by tear gas bomb in the chest under the heart, he lost consciousness caused by inhalation of quantities of tear gas, then he was transferred to Sheikh Zayed hospital in Ramallah, where they discovered a fracture in one of his ribs.
The Israeli police continued to arrest Al-A’alam TV correspondent Khader Shaheen and producer Muhammad Sarhan, on the pretext of violating military censorship, Since 5 January. his colleague, Faris Saraffandi said that journalist Ehud Yaari of Israeli Channel Two TV, incited against Shaheen, in the grounds that he is Israel citizen working with Iran (Shaheen has Israeli ID), and that he reported the movement of the Israeli army on Saturday at 6:30 pm, while claiming that the army announce the beginning of the operation at 8 pm. Israeli police searched for him next day in Sederot town, but did not found him. When he learned about it, he went to the police station in Jerusalem on Monday, accompanied by his lawyer, cameraman Ahmad Jalajil and producer Mohamed Sarhan, after three hours of Examination, the police asked them to go to the police station in Petah Tikva city (near Tel Aviv), they went there and after two hours of investigation, Shahin and Sarhan were arrested, and Jalajil was released, they asked the lawyer to leave.
Meanwhile, the occupying forces continued to prevent International media from entering Gaza Strip, despite a Decision by the Israel Supreme Court on 1 January, allowing groups of Eight journalists to enter GS, after a petition of the Foreign Press Association, but the Israeli occupation authorities is delaying the decision implementation, in an attempt to conceal its crimes in GS from the world public opinion, in clearly breach of freedom of opinion and expression.
Mada renews condemnation of the Israeli aggression on Gaza Strip in general, and attacks on journalists and media outlets. Mada calls the international community to bear its responsibility to halt Israel's barbaric war on Gaza Strip, and on the media, the release of journalist’s khader Shaheen and Mohamed Sarhan, and allowing the International media to enter Gaza Strip freely. Contact: Mousa Rimawi - Ramallah - Mada Coordinator info@madacenter.org - madapalestine@yahoo.com
***09.01.09. GAZA. Ten days after the Israeli's Supreme Court ruling on 31 December which ordered the state to allow foreign reporters into the Gaza Strip, Israel continues to block foreign media access (Article 19).
Each day international journalists have gone to the border crossing and have been turned away by military officials, normally on the premise that it is too dangerous and that the presence of journalists at the terminals could make them, a target for militants. Journalists have therefore not been able to talk to the Palestinians inside Gaza to gain their version of events. However, at the same time international reporters have been welcomed into Israel and have been free to interview Israeli officials on the crisis.
"The media blackout is a violation of the world's right to know what is happening in Gaza. In the absence of international media it is impossible to receive unbiased news on the situation. It is also an abuse of the right to freedom of expression for those living inside Gaza who are being prevented from telling their story to the world. Moreover, the presence of journalists on the ground can actually deter abuses of international human rights and international humanitarian law in a conflict situation. Freedom of expression and the right to access to information are necessary for building a situation of lasting peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians in the Middle East,” stated Agnes Callamard, Executive Director of ARTICLE 19.
Preventing foreign media from reporting from inside Gaza represents a new low for press freedom in Israel. The State has historically allowed access to foreign reporters even at the height of previous conflicts. The Israeli State not only stands in violation of international human rights law but is also acting against the decision of its own highest court by which eight members of the media were to be allowed into Gaza when the Erez crossing was opened for humanitarian reasons.
It should be noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling represents somewhat of a compromise between international standards and the Israeli State in that it permits the authorities to place a limitation on the number of journalists allowed entry to Gaza and only says they must consider increasing numbers once security allows. Although security is an issue for all journalists in conflict situations and it is sometimes easier to ensure the safety of small numbers, access to journalists should not be limited numerically. Limiting the numbers of journalists given access places a restriction upon the number of reports and range of opinions coming out of a conflict zone. There are currently journalists from about 30 different countries, speaking at least 10 different languages waiting in Israel to access Gaza. Even if the Israeli government were to permit the entry of 8 individuals at a time, this would clearly not be enough to serve the world’s media and right to informatio n effectively. ARTICLE 19 calls upon the Israeli authorities to allow immediate and unrestricted foreign media access into the Gaza Strip in accordance with its international obligations on the right to freedom of expression and the right to access information, under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Israel ratified on 3 October 1991.
***09.01.09 GAZA. Another Gaza Journalist Killed, IFJ Calls for Global Protest Over Media Blockade
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has called on the world of journalism to raise its voice in protest over Israeli government pressure on media trying to cover the Gaza conflict. The Government has imposed a blockade on the world's media trying to report on the crisis inside Gaza.
The IFJ call comes as another Palestinian journalist was reported killed - the fourth victim of recent Israeli military action in Gaza. Eyhab Al Wahidi , who worked as a cameraman for the Palestinian Broadcast Corporation in Gaza, was killed with his wife and mother in law yesterday when Israeli troops shelled their home in Gaza city. The family children were injured.
"The media crisis in Gaza has become intolerable," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "The systematic manipulation and control of media trying to report on Gaza and the casualties being sustained inside the territory require a concerted response from the world's media."
Despite an Israeli Supreme Court ruling ordering the government to allow a limited pool of journalists to enter Gaza, the army continues to block entry. Yesterday, two Israeli channels and the BBC were permitted to briefly accompany Israeli ground forces, but there is no hint that the government will permit journalists unfettered access to Gaza.
According to media reports, journalists for most television networks are broadcasting from a hill outside Sderot, and relying on Gazan journalists to serve as their eyes and ears. Meanwhile, Israel's sophisticated communications operation provides beleagured media staff with contacts, fact books full of charts and statistics, tours of the south of Israel and interviews with the Israeli victims of rocket attacks from Gaza.
"There is a cynical attempt to ensure that media tell the story from the Israeli side only," said White. "The truth cannot be told unless journalists are free to move, to talk with everyone involved and to see with their own eyes what is happening on the ground."
The IFJ says that legitimate security concerns are being raised, particularly related to the safety of media staff. "But this should not be used as an excuse to keep journalists from doing their work," said White. "Media must be free to judge the risks for themselves and not be constrained. When one side takes control of the message, truth-telling becomes overwhelmed by propaganda."
***08.01.09. TOP UN OFFICIAL CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE ACCESS FOR FOREIGN JOURNALISTS INTO GAZA New York, Jan 8 2009 3:10PM The chief of communications and public information for the United Nations today called on the Israeli Government to ensure immediate access for international media into Gaza, stressing the need for “full and independent” coverage of events unfolding in the territory which has been the target of an Israeli offensive launched nearly two weeks ago.
“Access to objective and factual information is of vital importance at all times, and plays a particularly important role in emergency situations,” Kiyo Akasaka, Under-Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information, writes in a letter to Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Gabriela Shalev.
Citing reports, including from the Foreign Press Association of Israel, that international media are not being allowed access to Gaza, Mr. Akasaka reminds the Israeli Government of the right to information enshrined in article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
He also recalls Security Council resolution 1738, in which the 15-member body urged all parties involved in situations of armed conflict to respect the professional independence and rights of journalists.
Member States have expressed a keen interest in what is taking place in Gaza, he states, adding that it is “of great importance to all concerned that international reporting be allowed to take place so that accurate information about the situation can inform global responses.”
A chorus of UN officials, including Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, have repeatedly called for an immediate halt to the fighting in Gaza and stressed the need to ensure humanitarian access to assist the 1.5 million civilians struggling amid rapidly deteriorating conditions. Jan 8 2009 3:10PM
***07.01.09. GAZA. IFJ Condemns Killings of Journalists and Backs Media Protests over Israeli Actions
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned the killing of a cameraman in Gaza as a result of an air strike carried out by Israeli forces in Gaza.
Basel Faraj, who worked as a cameraman for the Algerian TV network ENTV and the Palestine Broadcast Production Company, was wounded as a result of an Israeli air strike on 27 December. He died yesterday evening. He was filming in Gaza with reporters Mohamed Madi and Mohamed Al Tanany and Morocco Channel 2 cameraman, Khaled Abu Shammala all of whom were injured in the attack.
Basel is the second journalist to die from injuries in the recent Gaza conflict. Hamza Shahin, a photographer with Shehab News Agency, died on 26 December from wounds sustained in an earlier Israeli air attack on 7 December.
Journalists have been in the firing line since the beginning of the Israeli military operation. The Palestine Journalists Syndicate (PJS) says that Israeli forces have targeted vehicles and journalists who were clearly identified as such, with "Press" or "TV" markings.
The PJS has organised demonstrations in the West Bank town of Ramallah today to protest over the attacks on media and to show solidarity with journalists and media inside Gaza.
The IFJ has protested at the destruction of the offices of Al Aqsa Television on December 28 by Israeli fighter planes and called for Israel to open up Gaza to foreign correspondents in line with an order from Israeli judges.
"We strongly support our colleagues in Palestine as they speak out against Israeli attacks on journalists and media outlets,' said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "Israel is making a mockery of its status as a democratic country by violating international law, ignoring its own Supreme Court and showing contempt for the United Nations by defying its obligations under Resolution 1738 to protect journalists in conflict zones."
***06.01.09. GAZA. IFJ Slams Israel Over Targeting and "Cynical Violations" of Media Rights
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today accused Israel of targeting Palestinian media while continuing its ban on foreign journalists from entering Gaza to cover the conflict.
"Each day that passes we see cynical violations of press freedom and the rights of journalists trying desperately to cover the tragic events unfolding in Gaza," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "We have reports that media inside Gaza are being targeted by Israeli soldiers while those outside are being kept at bay."
Yesterday, a compromise reached between the authorities and the Jerusalem-based Foreign Press Association to allow a selected group of foreign journalists into Gaza was withdrawn, over-ruling an Israeli court order in favour of opening the blockade of the area to give media access. The IFJ says that any arrangement to allow access should not be controlled by the Israeli military.
At the same time the IFJ says that Israeli forces have attacked vehicles inside Gaza with ?Press" or "TV" markings and one cameraman has been injured. The IFJ has already protested at the destruction of the offices of Al Aqsa Television on December 28 by Israeli fighter planes in what it claims was a flagrant breach of international law.
The Palestine Journalists Syndicate (PJS) has also expressed concern over reports of the arrest and detention by Israeli military forces of Khezr Shahin, a reporter for Al-Alam
"The continued ban on journalists travelling into Gaza to cover the conflict is outrageous, particularly given that the courts in Israel have said they should be allowed in," said White. "But reports of targeting those who are on the spot add to our concern that there is a policy in place to deny access to the full story and to intimidate reporters that are already there."
Reports from the PJS in Gaza say that on Sunday a utility vehicle bearing "TV" and "Press" markings" from Al Aqsa TV was clearly targeted.
***05.01.2009. GAZA. Media Ban in Gaza a Recipe for Censorship, Ignorance and Fear, Says IFJ
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) says the Israeli ban on foreign journalists from entering Gaza to cover the conflict is a dangerous violation of press freedom that adds to "ignorance, uncertainty and fear" in the region. The IFJ says that the presence of independent reporters on the ground is needed to ensure that there are no flagrant abuses of human rights by combatants.
The IFJ's protest comes as the global humanitarian agency Human Rights Watch (HRW) called for rights monitors as well as journalists to be allowed into Gaza, a move that could help save lives.
"The Israeli ban on foreign news media from Gaza since December 27 raises concerns that there is a systematic attempt to prevent scrutiny of actions by the Israeli military," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "The eyes of the world are on Gaza, but Israel is trying to censor the news by keeping the media at bay."
The IFJ says that Israeli claims the ban was imposed because it cannot guarantee the safety of journalists is untenable.
"Few news people take this seriously given that Israel has already shown its contempt for international law by its targeted military strike on an unarmed television station at the outset of the conflict," said White.
For the past two months, when the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas broke down, Israel has restricted access to Gaza for foreign journalists. None has been allowed entry since the current military campaign began. The world's media are largely dependent upon coverage provided by local Palestinian freelance staff, many of whom are denied formal press accreditation by Israel and have no freedom to move in the region. Israeli journalists themselves are denied access to Gaza, say human rights groups, because of the government's policy of prohibiting citizens from entering Gaza.
The IFJ is concerned that restriction of access and movement may contribute to unbalanced reporting as journalists are unable to report from all conflict-hit areas.
The IFJ is supporting efforts by the Jerusalem-based Foreign Correspondents Association to get journalists access to Gaza, but is insisting that there should be no controlled access organised and supervised by the Israeli authorities.
"It is not for one side to dictate who goes into the area and in what circumstances," said White. "Journalists should be allowed to travel and work freely without monitoring by the military."
***04.01.09. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) calls for an international commission of inquiry in the attacks on journalists and media outlets
For the ninth day in a row, the Israeli occupation forces continued its brutal war on the Gaza Strip, which included various institutions of the Palestinian civil institutions: media outlets, schools, universities, ministries, charities, mosques and houses, leaving hundreds of victims and thousands of wounded and massive destruction.
Israeli artillery shelled yesterday (January 3), Dr. Ibrahim Maqadmeh mosque in Beit Lahiya city (GS), which led to the death of TV cameraman assistant Omar Silawi, as well as 15 prayers, and bombed the headquarters of Al-Resalah newspaper in Gaza City, and shelled this morning, the headquarters of the Sawt Al-Aqsa Radio in Gaza city, and penetrated the frequencies of Aqsa TV, which is broadcasting from unknown location, after the destruction of its headquarters in 28 December 2008.
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) expresses its strong condemnation of these crimes being committed by Israel in the Gaza Strip, against journalists and media outlets, which are blatant violation of international and humanitarian laws. Mada calls for the formation of an international commission of inquiry, and prosecution of those responsible for these crimes.
***04.01.09. SOMALIA. Kidnapped British, Spanish journalists Released
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RWB) have today welcomed the release of British Journalist Colin Freeman and Spanish photojournalist Jose Cendon, both working for the Daily Telegraph Newspaper.
Colin Freeman and Jose Cendon were kidnapped as they left from their hotel on Wednesday, 26 November 2008. The journalists have been staying in Bossasso for about a week to report on pirates.
“While we welcome the release of Colin Freeman and Jose Cendon, it is intolerable that journalists are kidnapped for their legitimate work in order to get ransom”, said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
“We renew our call for immediate and unconditional release of three journalists Amanda Lindhout, Abdifatah Mohammed Elmi and Nigel Brenan that were abducted in Mogadishu on 23rd August 2008”, Omar Faruk commented.
***28.12.08. GAZA. Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) condemns the Israeli aggression on Gaza and Aqsa TV headquarters
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) strongly condemns the continued Israeli occupation authority's attacks on journalists and the Palestinian media, in the framework of its criminal aggression on Gaza Strip, which began yesterday (December 27), and left more than 280 martyrs and hundreds of wounded.
Israeli warplane fired two missiles early today morning on Aqsa TV headquarters in Gaza city, which destroyed it completely. But it continued to broadcast from a secret location, where one of its news announcers said "this voice continues its work to expose the crimes of the occupation". This new crime, reminds us of bombing and destruction of Palestinian Public Radio and TV crime, on 19 January 2002 by Israeli occupation.
Although the bombing did not lead to any casualties in Aqsa TV staff, in view of the administration evacuation the headquarters in the previous day, but it forced Palestinian radio stations in Gaza Strip to evacuate its headquarters for fear of bombardment.
The Israeli occupation forces penetrated Sawt Al-Sha'b radio frequencies in Gaza city this morning, where they podcasted incitement against the resistance, and called on citizens not to cooperate with them. The radio administration denounced this action in a statement, "this is part of the aggression which doesn't spare anything".
While the Israeli occupation forces continued to prevent foreign journalists from entering Gaza Strip, the continuation of its aggression is a threat to the journalists covering the events there, ARD German TV correspondent Zakaria Al-Telmes said that the danger lurks in every place we go to cover the events.
Mada again expresses condemnation of the brutal Israeli aggression on Gaza Strip in general, and on Aqsa Television and Sawt Al-Sha'b radio, in particular. Mada calls upon the international community to bear its responsibility to stop the Israeli aggression on Gaza Strip and the media, and to lift of the siege completely. --------------------------------------------------- Contact: Mousa Rimawi Mada Coordinator info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com www.madacenter.org
**05.12.08. CPJ's 2008 prison census: Online and in jail - 125 journalists behind bars on December 1: China, Cuba, Burma, Eritrea, Uzbekistan top five
New York, December 4, 2008--Reflecting the rising influence of online reporting and commentary, more Internet journalists are jailed worldwide today than journalists working in any other medium. In its annual census of imprisoned journalists, released today, the Committee to Protect Journalists found that 45 percent of all media workers jailed worldwide are bloggers, Web-based reporters, or online editors. Online journalists represent the largest professional category for the first time in CPJ's prison census.
CPJ's survey found 125 journalists in all behind bars on December 1, a decrease of two from the 2007 tally. (Read detailed accounts of each imprisoned journalist.) China continued to be world's worst jailer of journalists, a dishonor it has held for 10 consecutive years. Cuba, Burma, Eritrea, and Uzbekistan round out the top five jailers from among the 29 nations that imprison journalists. Each of the top five nations has persistently placed among the world's worst in detaining journalists.
At least 56 online journalists are jailed worldwide, according to CPJ's census, a tally that surpasses the number of print journalists for the first time. The number of imprisoned online journalists has steadily increased since CPJ recorded the first jailed Internet writer in its 1997 census. Print reporters, editors, and photographers make up the next largest professional category, with 53 cases in 2008. Television and radio journalists and documentary filmmakers constitute the rest.
"Online journalism has changed the media landscape and the way we communicate with each other," said CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon. "But the power and influence of this new generation of online journalists has captured the attention of repressive governments around the world, and they have accelerated their counterattack."
In October, CPJ joined with Internet companies, investors, and human rights groups to combat government repression of online expression. After two years of negotiations, this diverse group announced the creation of the Global Network Initiative, which establishes guidelines enabling Internet and telecommunications companies to protect free expression and privacy online. Yahoo, Google, and Microsoft have joined the initiative.
Illustrating the evolving media landscape, the increase in online-related jailings has been accompanied by a rise in imprisonments of freelance journalists. Forty-five of the journalists on CPJ's census are freelancers; most of them work online. These freelancers are not employees of media companies and often do not have the legal resources or political connections that might help them gain their freedom. The number of imprisoned freelancers has risen more than 40 percent in the last two years, according to CPJ research.
"The image of the solitary blogger working at home in pajamas may be appealing, but when the knock comes on the door they are alone and vulnerable," said CPJ's Simon. "All of us must stand up for their rights--from Internet companies to journalists and press freedom groups. The future of journalism is online and we are now in a battle with the enemies of press freedom who are using imprisonment to define the limits of public discourse."
Antistate allegations such as subversion, divulging state secrets, and acting against national interests are the most common charge used to imprison journalists worldwide, CPJ found. About 59 percent of journalists in the census are jailed under these charges, many of them by the Chinese and Cuban governments.
About 13 percent of jailed journalists face no formal charge at all. The tactic is used by countries as diverse as Eritrea, Israel, Iran, the United States, and Uzbekistan, where journalists are being held in open-ended detentions without due process. At least 16 journalists worldwide are being held in secret locations. Among them is Gambian journalist "Chief" Ebrima Manneh, whose whereabouts, legal status, and health have been kept secret since his arrest in July 2006. From the U.S. Senate to the West African human rights court, international observers have called on authorities to free Manneh, who was jailed for trying to publish a critical report about Gambian President Yahya Jammeh.
Nowhere is the ascendance of Internet journalism more evident than in China, where 24 of 28 jailed journalists worked online. China's prison list includes Hu Jia, a prominent human rights activist and blogger, who is serving a prison term of three and a half years for online commentaries and media interviews in which he criticized the Communist Party. He was convicted of "incitement to subvert state power," a charge commonly used by authorities in China to jail critical writers. At least 22 journalists are jailed in China on this and other vague antistate charges.
Cuba, the world's second worst jailer, released two imprisoned journalists during the year after negotiations with Spain. Madrid, which resumed cooperative programs with Cuba in February, has sought the release of imprisoned writers and dissidents in talks with Havana. But Cuba continued to hold 21 writers and editors in prison as of December 1, all but one of them swept up in Fidel Castro's massive 2003 crackdown on the independent press. In November, CPJ honored Héctor Maseda Gutiérrez, who at 65 is the oldest of those jailed in Cuba, with an International Press Freedom Award.
Burma, the third worst jailer, is holding 14 journalists. Five were arrested while trying to spread news and images from areas devastated by Cyclone Nargis. The blogger and comedian Maung Thura, who uses the professional name Zarganar, was sentenced to a total of 59 years in prison during closed proceedings in November. Authorities accused Maung Thura of illegally disseminating video footage of relief efforts in hard-hit areas, communicating with exiled dissidents, and causing public alarm in comments to foreign media.
Eritrea, with 13 journalists in prison, is the fourth worst jailer. Eritrean authorities have refused to disclose the whereabouts, legal status, or health of any of the journalists they have imprisoned. Unconfirmed online reports have said that three of the jailed journalists may have died in custody, but the government has refused to even say whether the detainees are alive or dead.
Uzbekistan, with six journalists detained, is the fifth worst jailer. Those in custody include Dzhamshid Karimov, nephew of the country's president. A reporter for independent news Web sites, Karimov has been forcibly held in a psychiatric hospital since 2006.
Here are other trends and details that emerged in CPJ's analysis:In about 11 percent of cases, governments have used a variety of charges unrelated to journalism to retaliate against critical writers, editors, and photojournalists. Such charges range from regulatory violations to drug possession. In the cases included in this census, CPJ has determined that the charges were most likely lodged in reprisal for the journalist's work.
Violations of censorship rules, the next most common charge, are applied in about 10 percent of cases. Criminal defamation charges are filed in about 7 percent of cases, while charges of ethnic or religious insult are lodged in another 4 percent. Two journalists are jailed for filing what authorities consider to be "false" news. (More than one type of charge may apply in individual cases.
Print and Internet journalists make up the bulk of the census. Television journalists compose the next largest professional category, accounting for 6 percent of cases. Radio journalists account for 4 percent, and documentary filmmakers 3 percent.
The 2008 tally reflects the second consecutive decline in the total number of jailed journalists. That said, the 2008 figure is roughly consistent with census results in each year since 2000. CPJ research shows that imprisonments rose significantly in 2001, after governments imposed sweeping national security laws in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States. Imprisonments stood at 81 in 2000 but have since averaged 128 in CPJ's annual surveys.
The United States, which is holding photographer Ibrahim Jassam without charge in Iraq, has made CPJ's list of countries jailing journalists for the fifth consecutive year. During this period, U.S. military authorities have jailed dozens of journalists in Iraq--some for days, others for months at a time--without charge or due process. No charges have ever been substantiated in these cases.
CPJ does not apply a rigid definition of online journalism, but it carefully evaluates the work of bloggers and online writers to determine whether the content is journalistic in nature. In general, CPJ looks to see whether the content is reportorial or fact-based commentary. In a repressive society where the traditional media is restricted, CPJ takes an inclusive approach to work that is produced online.
The organization believes that journalists should not be imprisoned for doing their jobs. CPJ has sent letters expressing its serious concerns to each country that has imprisoned a journalist.
CPJ's list is a snapshot of those incarcerated at midnight on December 1, 2008. It does not include the many journalists imprisoned and released throughout the year; accounts of those cases can be found at www.cpj.org. Journalists remain on CPJ's list until the organization determines with reasonable certainty that they have been released or have died in custody.
Journalists who either disappear or are abducted by nonstate entities, including criminal gangs, rebels, or militant groups, are not included on the imprisoned list. Their cases are classified as "missing" or "abducted."
***01.12.08.Director-General of UNESCO condemns killing of Pakistani journalists Abdul Razzak Johra and Qari Mohammad Shoaib and voices grave concern about safety of journalists in the country
Paris, 01 December – The Director-General of UNESCO, Koïchiro Matsuura, today condemned the murders of Pakistani journalists Abdul Razzak Johra, of the Royal TV network, on 3 November and Qari Mohammad Shoaib, of the Azadi and Khabar Kar newspapers, on 8 November. Mr Matsuura also voiced concern over the increasing number of attacks on reporters in the country.
“I condemn the killing of Abdul Razzak Johra and of Qari Mohammad Shoaib,” the Director-General said. “Abdul Razzak Johra’s reporting on crime has cost him his life, which shows the direct link between freedom of expression and rule of law. The need to ensure rule of law is also highlighted by tragic mistakes such as that which appears to have caused the death of Qari Mohammad Shoaib.”
2“Furthermore,” Mr Matsuura added, “I am gravely concerned by reports of the increasing number of attacks and kidnappings, endured by domestic and foreign journalists in Pakistan. I trust that the authorities will spare no effort in supporting the media’s right to carry out their professional duties at the service of society as a whole.”
According to the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, Abdul Razzak Johra, aged 45, was dragged away from his home by six armed men before he was killed on 3 November. He is reported to have been working on drug-related crimes. Local drug dealers are believed to be responsible for his murder. Qari Mohammad Shoaib was shot dead by security forces in Mingora in the north-western Swat valley, allegedly because he failed to stop his vehicle when signalled to do so. According to the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), security forces admitted that Shoaib was killed by mistake. Since then, Motoki Yotsukura, the Islamabad bureau chief of the Japanese daily Asahi Shimbun, and Sami Yousufzai, a correspondent for U.S. magazine Newsweek, both suffered serious injuries as they escaped a kidnapping attempt in Peshawar on 14 November.
There is also concern regarding the safety of Khadija Abdul Qahar, a Canadian formerly known as Beverly Giesbrecht, who publishes a web-based magazine, http://www.jihadunspun.com . The PFUJ said she was kidnapped along with her interpreter and guide, both Pakistani nationals, on 11 November whilst travelling in a taxi to the town of Miramshah, in the North Waziristan tribal area bordering Afghanistan.
The International Federation of Journalists reports that seven journalists have been killed in Pakistan this year.
***28.11.08. Journalists Face Increased Threats and Harassment in South East Europe
SEEMO/IPI Concerned About the Potential for Further Violence against the Media in the Region
The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), a network of editors, media executives and leading journalists from South East Europe and an affiliate of the International Press Institute (IPI), is deeply concerned about a string of threats issued against journalists in the region, rendered particularly ominous by violent attacks on journalists throughout 2008. Yesterday, Drago Hedl, a columnist for the Croatian Jutarnji list, received an SMS threatening to "massacre" him, just as a parliament member accused of war crimes was holding a press conference during which he singled out for criticism Hedl's writings. Other threats included those made against Hrvoje Appelt, a Croatian journalist for the Zagreb-based weekly Globus. On 20 November 2008, Appelt found a device that turned out to be a fake bomb under his car. Appelt has in the past published several articles about smuggling activities in Croatia.
Also on 20 November, a verbal threat was issued against editors of Story magazine by a Croatian football player. According to sources from Story, the football player made his threats during a visit to the magazine's newsroom, where he harassed Vladimir Milinovic, the editor of the magazine's webpage, as well as a photojournalist Tino Banic.
These threats follow several physical attacks against journalists in Croatia during 2008, underscoring the seriousness of the risks faced by the media in that country. The violence peaked with the 23 October murders of Ivo Pukanic, journalist and owner of the NCL Media Group in Zagreb, and Niko Franjic, marketing director of the newspaper Nacional, which is published by NCL.
Threats have also been issued in Serbia. Vukasin Obradovic, owner of the weekly Novine Vranjske, and his family, who live in Vranja, Serbia, have received several threats during the last few months. In one incident, an unknown person warned Obdradovic's daughter that her father would be killed within ten days. Obradovic has been the target of numerous death threats during the past years.
Also in Serbia, Slavko Savic and Cedomir Savic of RTV Kursumlija were threatened by a group of local politicians and five army reservists. The men, who were unhappy about a particular report aired on the station, entered RTV Kursumlija's premises during the evening and threatened to murder Savic, the station's editor.
Harassment against journalists also continues to come in other forms. Cristina Dumitrescu, a Romanian journalist for Radio Romania, the country's national public radio broadcaster, was informed by telephone that the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Moldova had declined to issue her an accreditation card. She applied for accreditation, which is necessary to work in the Republic of Moldova, on 13 October, when she arrived in Chisinau. SEEMO condemns this decision, which comes after several other journalists working for Romanian media faced denials and delays when seeking accreditation to be able to work in Moldova.
SEEMO is concerned that these developments, which further tarnish the region's press freedom record, could lead to further violence against the media. It urges the relevant authorities to take seriously the potential risks these incidents represent.
***26.11.08. Two Journalists Kidnapped in Somalia
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is shocked by the kidnapping of two foreign journalists in commercial city of Bossasso in Puntland, north east Somalia.
Colin Freeman (British National) and Jose Cenden (Spanish National), who are working for Daily Telegraph Newspaper in London as reporter and photojournalist respectively, were kidnapped as they left from their hotel in this morning (Wednesday). The journalists have been staying in Bossasso for about a week to report on pirates.
This business of kidnapping journalists for any reason is unacceptable. Puntland authorities must immediately secure the liberty of these journalists while cooperating with intellectuals and clan elders in order not to put in danger their safety said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
A year after the Saffron Revolution and just weeks before UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon’s planned visit, freedom of expression in Burma has reached a historical low point with the sentencing of a comedian to 45 years and the imprisonment of journalists, lawyers, poets and activists. ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship are immensely saddened by the plummeting situation in Burma and are concerned by the evident chain of events which systematically undermine human rights and freedom of expression. A number of worrying incidents have taken place recently, including:
September 2008 • From September onwards, Burmese news sites Mizzima and Irrawaddy have been targeted with electronic attacks and have their servers bombarded with denial-of-service attacks
October 2008 • Two judges involved in cases arising from last year’s protests, Nyi Nyi Htwe and Saw Kyaw Kyaw Min, were sentenced to six months in jail on 29 October under Section 228 of the Penal Code for requesting that the Information Minister and Director General of police be called as witnesses for their three clients
November 2008 • New political detainees including Htwe and Min were moved to prisons far away so that their families cannot supply them with the essential necessities such as food and medicine
7 November • Supreme Court advocates U Aung Thein and U Khin Maung Shein involved in the cases of protesters were convicted to four-month prison terms for contempt of court under Section 3 of the 1926 Contempt of Courts Act after submitting a letter to the court that called into question the fairness of the entire judicial process
11 November • The infamous Insein prison special court in Rangoon sentenced fourteen leading democracy activists, all members of the ’88 Generation Student group, to 65 years imprisonment each • Nay Phone Latt, a pro-democracy blogger, was handed down a 20-year prison sentence for posting on his website material that criticised military leader Than She. His lawyer was also put behind bars for criticising the special court's procedures • Labour activist Su Su Nwe was sentenced to 12 and a half years imprisonment, and poet Saw Wai was sentenced to two years imprisonment for a hidden anti-Than She message in one of his poems • Musician Win Maw, arrested on 27 November 2007, was charged under Article 5(j) of the penal code with "threatening national security" and sentenced to six years in prison
14 November • Eco Vision journalist Ein Khaing Oo was given a two-year prison term for taking photographs of survivors of Cyclone Nargis
18 November • Three activists from the ’88 Generation Students group were sentenced for up to 33 years imprisonment for inciting public unrest under the Emergency Act • Two Buddhist monks Ashin Gambira and U Kalatha were also sentenced to long prison terms of around 12 years for their part in leading the demonstrations of 2007 • Five UN experts, including envoy Tomas Ojea Quintana, condemned the severe convictions and the unfair trials of prisoners of conscience
20 November • Following his father and grandfather who were sentenced on 11 November, Di Nyein Lin and two other student activists were sentenced to six and a half years imprisonment for causing public alarm and insulting religion
21 November • Comedian Zarganar, arrested on 4 June 2008 for collecting money for Cyclone Nargis victims, was sentenced to a staggering 45 years for creating “disaffection towards state and government” and violating the Electronics Act. Zarganar also has another five cases remaining against him to be tried on 27 November • Sports columnist Zaw Thet Htwe and co-accused Thant Zin Aung were sentenced to 15 years imprisonment each, and Tin Maung Aye received 29 years in prison, all for their similar roles in the same cyclone relief efforts
Awaiting Trial • There are many more cases lined up in this rapidly unfolding situation that include magazine editor Zaw Thet Htwe, human rights defender U Myint Aye and activist monk U Gambira.
Over the last year, the number of political prisoners has leapt from 1,200 in 2007 to over 2,100 today. What was already an unfair and opaque legal system has also deteriorated substantially and cases are now heard within prisons devoid of any form of openness or transparency. Such arbitrary use of legal provisions, brutal treatment of prisoners and the harsh prison sentences against peaceful demonstrators provide ample evidence that the military government still fails to comply with international human rights standards, especially the right to freedom of expression, freedom of association and the right to a fair trial.
Furthermore with so-called “free” elections for a new “democratic” government to be held in two years time, the government is quashing any form of resistance and sentencing any possible political opposition to long periods in jail, many in solitary confinement. Removing those few remaining activists, journalists and lawyers who try to stand up and protest, makes any future elections meaningless.
ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship note that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon has repeatedly declared that Burma is a key priority for the UN. We also note and express gratitude that the European Union, Japan and the United States have all released statements on the unfolding situation.
Unfortunately however, the states with the largest influence over the Burmese government, namely China, India and Thailand have remained silent.
ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship call upon China, India, Thailand and the ASEAN countries to raise these abuses with the Burmese government. Furthermore, ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship call upon European Union member states, and in particular Nicolas Sarkozy in his capacity as President of the Council of the European Union and José Manuel Barroso, President of the 2European Commission, to use the upcoming 11th EU-China Summit in Lyon, France, to raise these issues with the Chinese government as part of their promised regional dialogue.
**05.11.08. TECH GIANTS PROMISE TO DEFEND FREE EXPRESSION ONLINE (IFEX)
Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! have joined forces with IFEX members the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Human Rights Watch, the World Press Freedom Committee (WPFC) and others to sign a global code of conduct promising to combat online censorship and protect user privacy on the Internet.
The Global Network Initiative, drawn up by a broad coalition of Internet companies, rights groups, academics and investors, follows criticism that companies were assisting governments in countries like China to censor the Internet.
Its code of conduct, or "principles", seeks to advance user rights to free expression and privacy, especially when faced with government demands for censorship and disclosure of users' personal information.
"These principles provide a clear road map where none existed before - and they are not simply aspirational, they are concrete," said CPJ.
Under the new principles, which were crafted over two years, participating companies promise to protect the personal information of their users wherever they do business and to "narrowly interpret and implement government demands that compromise privacy."
They also commit to looking at the human rights climate in a country before concluding business deals and to ensuring their employees and partners do the same.
"These principles assist the press and any other citizens who seek to inform and influence others by ensuring a strong united front against the government persecution and censorship that is often effected against the lone dissenter," said WPFC.
The impetus for such an agreement follows the trend of governments increasingly turning new technologies into tools of control and repression - often with the complicity of well-known ICT companies. According to CPJ, one in three journalists imprisoned today worked online.
Google has been accused of complying with Chinese government demands to filter Internet search results regarding topics such as democracy or Tiananmen Square. Microsoft has come under attack for blocking blogs of Chinese users who criticised the government. Last month, Canadian researchers uncovered that a Skype joint venture in China monitored users' communications.
Shi Tao, a reporter accused of leaking state secrets for sending an email about Chinese media restrictions of the Tiananmen Square massacre, was jailed for 10 years after Yahoo! gave the Chinese government his personal information. According to RSF, at least four cyber-dissidents have been jailed because of user information supplied by Yahoo! to the Chinese authorities.
Yahoo! co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang welcomed the new code of conduct. He said, "These principles provide a valuable roadmap for companies like Yahoo! operating in markets where freedom of expression and privacy are unfairly restricted.
"Yahoo! was founded on the belief that promoting access to information can enrich people's lives and the principles we unveiled today reflect our determination that our actions match our values around the world," he added.
The plan has yet to receive the support of Internet companies in China and other countries whose policies it implicitly attacks.
The effort is seen by some as not going far enough. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) recently announced its decision to withdraw from the discussions and to not endorse the principles. RSF said it was "concerned by several loopholes and weak language on the central points that may threaten the very implementation of these principles and justify the status quo."
RSF points out that local law remains the reference even if it violates human rights standards, and issues related to how and who will monitor the companies' compliance have yet to be addressed. "Under these principles, another Shi Tao case is still possible," said RSF.
Instead, RSF has focused its energy on getting the Global Online Freedom Act passed. A bill introduced in the U.S. in February 2006 and in the EU earlier this year, the act bans companies from locating servers containing personal data in repressive countries, and makes it a crime for countries to sell surveillance and Internet-blocking technology to authoritarian governments. The U.S. act awaits a vote, while the EU version was only just initiated in July. 2 IFEX members involved in the initiative recognise it is only a first step.. "While CPJ realises that this is not a silver bullet that will guarantee there will be no more Shi Taos, we support and are a part of the Global Network Initiative because we believe we can achieve more working together than individually," said CPJ.
"The real test will be in its implementation, and whether mandatory measures are included to protect Internet users," said Human Rights Watch..
The Global Network Initiative is actively recruiting additional members. See: http://www.globalnetworkinitiative.org
***31.10.08. New deterioration in Sri Lanka, according to the International Press Freedom Mission
The International Press Freedom Mission to Sri Lanka on its visit between October 25 and 29 found deterioration in the press freedom situation since its last visit in June 2007, marked by a continuation in murders, attacks, abductions, intimidation and harassment of the media. In the recent World Press Freedom Index published by RSF, Sri Lanka has fallen to the lowest press freedom rating of any democratic country worldwide.
The International Mission is alarmed at the use of an anti-terrorism law for the first time in the democratic world, to punish journalists purely for what they have written. J.S. Tissainayagam, B. Jasiharan and V. Vallarmathy have been detained since March 2008 and later charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act. The Mission is worried about the dangerous precedent this sets for all media nationally and internationally.
In recent months journalists and media institutions seeking to report independently on the ongoing conflict have been attacked and intimidated in a seeming effort to limit public knowledge about the conduct of the war and to reveal their sources. This is a violation of the public right to know and the accepted norm that media sources should be protected.
Media in the North and East of the country have continued to bear the brunt of the worst forms of insecurity. Media access to war-affected areas is heavily restricted with journalists forced to reproduce information disseminated by the conflicting parties. Media are constantly threatened by all parties to the conflict in an effort to curtail independent and critical reporting. The International Mission condemns the murder of P. Devakumar in Jaffna in May 2008, as well as over a dozen other murders documented since 2005.
In the LTTE-controlled areas freedom of expression and freedom of movement continue to be heavily restricted preventing diverse opinions and access to plural sources of information.
Media rules gazetted on October 10th by the Sri Lankan Government provide for a number of contingencies under which broadcasting licences can be cancelled, including seven different grounds related to broadcast content. Moreover, a popular broadcast channel has been put on notice that it is to submit transcripts of news broadcasts "to be carried" every week as of October 28th. The International Mission deplores any effort to impose prior restraint or direct censorship on the media.
The International Mission is shocked at repeated instances of elected representatives and Government Ministers using violence and inflammatory language against media workers and institutions. The Mission is also concerned that state-owned media and the website of the Ministry of Defence have contributed to the vilification of independent media and journalists. Such actions can only be construed as efforts to discredit media through false accusations and clearly places them in danger.
The International Mission applauds the solidarity and resolve shown by the five organisations of journalists in Sri Lanka – the Free Media Movement, Sri Lankan Working Journalists' Association, Federation of Media Employees' Trade Unions, Sri Lankan Tamil Media Alliance and Sri Lankan Muslim Media Forum – in a tough and challenging situation.
Moreover, the International Mission supports the solidarity displayed by media owners and editors in seeking to bring the perpetrators of recent attacks on journalists to justice.
The International Mission would welcome the imminent invitation of the UN Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression by the Sri Lankan government in line with its commitments to the Human Rights Council in 2006.
Background
In October 2006 and June 2007 delegations from the International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to Sri Lanka, which is comprised of twelve international press freedom and media development organisations, undertook fact-finding and advocacy missions to Sri Lanka.
In order to follow-up on these missions, the International Mission returned to Sri Lanka in October 2008. The delegation for this visit is comprised of the International Federation of Journalists (www.ifj.org), International Media Support (www.i-m-s.dk), International News Safety Institute (www.newssafety.org), International Press Institute (www.freemedia.at), and Reporters Without Borders (www.rsf.org).
Members of the International Mission met with the President of Sri Lanka, Ministerial Committee on Journalists Grievances, political parties, media owners and editors, journalists and media workers, human rights and legal experts, and the international community.
***08.10.08. INSI welcomes Council of Europe resolution on journalist safety and urges governments to act
Brussels, 8 October - The International News Safety Institute on Wednesday urged governments to comply with the terms of a landmark resolution on media freedom adopted by the parliament of the Council of Europe.
A key clause of Resolution 1636, adopted on 3 October, says journalists must be protected against physical harm.
"Journalists must be protected against physical threats or attacks because of their work," says one of 27 "basic principles" listed by the Resolution for member states to address.
"Police protection must be provided where requested by journalists under threat. Prosecutors and courts must deal adequately and timely with cases where journalists have received threats or have been attacked."
An INSI inquiry into the deaths of journalists and other news professionals around the world over the 10 years 1996-2006 recorded 1,000 fatalities, most of them murdered in peacetime in their own countries. In almost 9 out of 10 cases no one was brought to justice.
"We welcome this Resolution as an important development in the worldwide fight for journalists to be able to do their jobs free from harm or threats," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "We call on all European governments to implement it urgently and for governments elsewhere to follow Europe's lead."
The Resolution underlines the importance or media freedom, saying it is an essential requirement of democracy. In it, the parliament calls on all 47 Council of Europe member states to analyse the state of democracy in their countries which, it says, must rest on a number of principles concerning media freedom.
"The Assembly invites national parliaments to analyse their own media situation regularly in an objective and comparable manner in order to be able to identify shortcomings in their national media legislation and practice and take appropriate measures to remedy them," the resolution says.
The list of basic principles on which such analysis should rest includes a guaranteed right to freedom and expression through the media, respect for the confidentiality of journalists' sources, free movement for foreign journalists, editorial independence from owners and transparent ownership of media outlets.
It calls on national parliaments to draw up periodic reports on media freedom in their countries to be discussed at European level.
Resolution 1636 reinforces Resolution 1535 passed by the Assembly last year calling for an end to threats and violence against journalists and reminding member states of their obligations to investigate murders of journalists.
The United Nations Security Council in December 2006 unanimously passed Resolution 1738 on the safety of journalists in conflict after a long campaign by INSI and member organisations the International Federation of Journalists and the European Broadcasting Union.
"These welcome declarations make clear to all that the world's leading political bodies are increasingly concerned with the safety of journalists following years of intolerable casualties," said INSI Director Pinder.
"At last we have a wide understanding at the highest levels that there can be no real freedom where journalists are killed because of their job. We now await firm action by national governments to embrace these safeguards unconditionally."
***03.10.08. PEC Joins World Journalists Call for End of Impunity in Russia on Anniversary of Politkovskaya Killing
As journalists, their organisations, and human rights and press freedom groups are preparing to commemorate the second anniversary of the killing of investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya, the International Federation of Journalists today urged all its affiliates worldwide to join the call for renewed efforts to end impunity in Russia.
Politkovskaya's writings from the frontline of conflicts on Russia's borders, in particular on human rights abuses by Russian forces in Chechnya, captured the imagination of readers the world over.
She was shot in the entrance to her block of flats on October 7, 2006. Her brutal murder sent shockwaves around the world of journalism and sparked protests and demonstrations across the globe to show sympathy for her family and demand justice.
IFJ President Jim Boumelha is asking IFJ affiliates, representing 600,000 journalists worldwide, to send solidarity greetings to the demonstrators assembling in Pushkin Square on October 7 th to mark the anniversary of Politkovskaya's death.
"Journalists around the world will spend the day reflecting on Anna's shocking death which has come to symbolise the hundreds of journalists who are targeted and killed each year for their work," Boumelha said. "Too often many killings go uninvestigated and unpunished. On the rare occasions when the people who carried out the murders are found guilty those who gave the orders have remained beyond the law."
"While it is still too early to pass judgment on Politkovskaya's investigation, the IFJ urges the Russian authorities to provide the investigators with all the support required," he added.
Russia has one of the highest death rates among journalists of any country in the world with 230 recorded deaths since 1993. In the past two years, seven other Russian journalists have died: Konstantin Brovko, Magomet Yevloev, Gadzhi Abashilov, Telman Alishaev, Vyacheslav Ifanov, Ivan Safronov and Leonid Etkind.
The IFJ has been working with its affiliate in Russia, the Russian Union of Journalists, to lobby the government to improve journalist safety and prosecute those attacking media.
"We cannot forget the scores of Russian colleagues who were killed with impunity, including Anna Politkovskaya," said Boumelha. "These attacks have taken a grim toll on our courageous Russian colleagues and on press freedom in Russia. Press freedom cannot exist when journalists are forced to work in such dangerous conditions." Click here to see the IFJ solidarity letter to the demonstrators marking the anniversary.
***30.09.08. BURMA ONE YEAR AFTER - One Year After Violent Crackdown, Repression Continues UN Should Press Military Leaders to Keep Their Promises (HRW)
(New York, September 26, 2008) – The international community should demand accountability from the Burmese military government for the brutal crackdown in September 2007 on monks, activists, and other civilians, Human Rights Watch said today. Repression in Burma has increased and the military government has failed to deliver on promises it made a year ago, despite international efforts at mediation.
Last September, the Burmese people courageously challenged their military rulers, and they were answered with violence and contempt. The repression continues. While a handful of political activists have been released, more are being arrested and thousands remain in prison. The crackdown that began on September 26, 2007, was a brutal response to growing protests initially triggered in part by the doubling of fuel prices in mid-August 2007. In the following weeks, Buddhist monks in Rangoon, Mandalay, and other towns across Burma staged peaceful marches to protest government policies and poor living standards. Lay supporters gradually joined the marches, swelling to tens of thousands of people calling for political, economic and social reforms.
“Last September, the Burmese people courageously challenged their military rulers, and they were answered with violence and contempt,” said Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The repression continues. While a handful of political activists have been released, more are being arrested and thousands remain in prison.”
On September 23, 2008, the ruling State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) announced the release of 9,002 prisoners from Burma’s jails, among them seven political activists, including 78-year-old U Win Tin, a prominent activist and journalist imprisoned since 1989.
But in August and September 2008 alone, the Burmese authorities arrested an estimated 39 political activists and sentenced 21 to prison terms. On September 16, Burmese authorities arrested Nilar Thein, a prominent activist in hiding since the 2007 protests. Zargana, a famous activist and comedian, has remained in prison since July 2008 for publicly criticizing the SPDC’s slow response to aid following Cyclone Nargis. The SPDC currently holds more than 2,100 political prisoners, including more than 800 arrested following the 2007 protests.
In the crackdown a year ago, Burmese security forces beat, arrested, detained and shot monks and other protesters in the streets of Rangoon. Police and plain-clothes paramilitary members arrested thousands of peaceful participants in the protests in nighttime raids on monasteries and their homes. In the following days, hundreds more were beaten, arrested and detained at makeshift detention facilities, police stations and jails.
In the most extensive documentation of the crackdown to date, Human Rights Watch documented at least 20 cases of extrajudicial killings, and dozens of beatings and arrests by riot police and army soldiers, assisted by local paramilitaries of the pro-government Union Solidarity and Development Association.
The true number of people killed may never be known, since there has been no investigation by Burmese authorities or UN investigators. The UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Burma, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, made a report after his November 2007 visit, but acknowledged it was not a full investigation and recommended that the UN Human Rights Council call for investigations into the circumstances of the crackdown.
“It’s a failure of the Burmese government and the international community that the perpetrators of killing, arbitrary arrests and torture during the September 2007 crackdown have not been brought to justice,” Pearson said.
Instead, the SPDC has continued with its plans of pseudo-political reforms, conducting a constitutional referendum in May. The military government claims that there was a voter turnout of over 98 percent of eligible voters and that 92 percent of them endorsed a constitution that cements military rule. Human Rights Watch has reported on the human rights problems surrounding the referendum, including sharp restrictions on freedom of assembly, association, and tight controls on the media.
Since the September 2007 crackdown, the United Nations Secretary General’s Special Advisor on Burma, Ibrahim Gambari, has made four visits to Burma. The SPDC made numerous promises to Gambari that is has failed to keep: Dialogue with the detained democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi did briefly resume but broke down; The constitutional referendum was not free and fair; Not all political parties are able to participate in the electoral process; and, The roadmap to democracy is neither credible nor inclusive.
“Despite an array of promises to the United Nations, the Burmese military government has not made good on any of them,” Pearson said. “Rather than let Burma’s rulers continue to engage in fruitless dialogue, the international community should demand real action.”
***24.09.08. BURMA. MYANMAR’S RELEASE OF LONG-SERVING DETAINEE ‘POSITIVE’ STEP, SAYS UNESCO CHIEF - PEC welcomes this positive development, but strongly condemns such a long arrest of a journalist, nearly 20 years, without real charges
The head of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has hailed Myanmar’s release of U Win Tin, a writer and former newspaper editor who was detained for nearly 20 years and is also the 2001 laureate of a press freedom prize instituted by the agency.
“It is with immense joy that I welcome the release of U Win Tin,” UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura said yesterday on hearing of the development.
“In freeing U Win Tin and other prisoners, the authorities have taken a wise and positive step towards respecting the fundamental human right of freedom of expression, an indispensable component of democracy and rule of law,” Mr. Matsuura added.
U Win Tin, 79, is the former editor of the daily Hanthawati newspaper, vice-chair of Myanmar’s Writers’ Association and a founder of the National League for Democracy (NLD), whose leader Aung San Suu Kyi remains under house arrest.
He was arrested in July 1989 and was accused of belonging to the banned Communist Party of Myanmar. Sentenced to 14 years jail, he received an additional term of five years in 1996 for breaking prison regulations prohibiting the possession of writing materials.
In 2001, U Win Tin was honoured with the UNESCO/Guillermo Cano Press Freedom Prize, named after the Colombian newspaper publisher assassinated in 1987 for denouncing the activities of powerful drug barons in his country.
News of the release of U Win Tin and several others was also welcomed yesterday by the independent UN expert on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Tomás Ojea Quintana, who said he hoped the move “would be the first in a series of releases of other prisoners of conscience, some 2,000 of whom are currently estimated to be still detained in Myanmar.” 2008-09-24 00:00:00.000
***23.09.08. GEORGIA: follow-up the PEC representative Zviad Pochkua visit in Geneva (see PEC NEWS) -OSCE media freedom representative says journalists need free and safe access to Georgia 's South Ossetia and Abkhazia regions
VIENNA, - The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Miklos Haraszti, called today for journalists' safe access to the crisis regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, now controlled by Russian forces, and urged unbiased reporting on all sides.
"The war in Georgia has claimed the lives of professionals dedicated to inform the public, in addition to those of innocent civilian victims. I would like to express my condolences to the families of the journalists who were killed and wounded during the conflict," said Haraszti.
Grigol Chikhladze, the head of Alania TV, Alexander Klimchuk, the head of the Causasus Images Agency and correspondent for Itar-Tass, were killed on 10 August in Tskhinvali, and Stan Storimans, a cameraman with the Dutch RTL Nieuws died in Gori on 12 August. The journalists injured included at least five Russians, two Georgians, two Turkish, a Dutch, an Israeli, and an American.
"Now that the armed conflict is over, it is time to grant full access for journalists to the crisis regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. All undue limitations on entry for the media should be lifted," added Haraszti.
Haraszti referred to reports that access to South Ossetia and Abkhazia remains selectively restricted for the media. Georgian and international journalists are still not able to enter the crisis regions. The only reported exception was made for the Georgian journalists who accompanied Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on his visit to Sukhumi and Tskhinvali on 14 and 15 September.
Commenting on mutual blockage of Georgian and Russian Internet sites and television channels during the conflict, Haraszti said: "The blockage has naturally stopped now that the conflict is over. More problematic is that television on all sides seems to still be imbued with guided or biased information."
Haraszti emphasized the need for unbiased, independent reporting on the situation, saying: "The post-Yugoslav wars have demonstrated what devastation propagandistic coverage and hateful comments can cause between nations. Investigating claims of genocide, reporting on the plight of civilian victims, documenting demolished villages and visiting refugees are best done by independent reporters, and what they need is not guided tours but free and safe access."
***22.09.08. IFJ Demands Action as Killers Target New Iraqi Union President (Read also PEC NEWS)
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today vigorously condemned a targeted bomb attack on the President of the Iraqi Union of Journalists (IUJ) in Baghdad only seven months after his predecessor was shot dead by extremists. The IFJ is demanding increased security for the union and personal protection for its leaders.
The attack on Moaid Al-Lami took place yesterday when an explosion outside the union headquarters ripped into the building. He was detained in hospital with cuts and bruises amidst concern over his heart and lungs. Several others were hurt in the blast.
Al-Lami, the former union General Secretary, was elected in July to replace Shahib Al-Timimi, the veteran union President who was shot and killed in a shocking incident near the union offices in February of this year. The two men have been warned that their lives are threatened because of their criticism of attacks on media by political extremists.
"This is yet more horrifying evidence that the people threatening journalists' leaders are deadly serious," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "Action must be taken now to ensure they have protection."
The IFJ is supporting the IUJ and the Iraqi Media Safety Group, established by the IFJ and the International News Safety Institute, in their demands for the Iraqi government to adopt a protection of journalists' law demanded by the journalists' union six months ago.
"There must be no more delay or prevarication - the journalists' union and its members must be given support and assistance now, including personal protection," said White.
The attack took place as a weekly meeting of unions leaders was ending and comes within a week of the killing of four journalists and media staff working for the of Iraqi satellite TV channel Al Sharqiya in Mosul. According to the union, 286 journalists have been killed, often in targeted murders, since the invasion of Iraq in April 2003.
The IFJ is demanding that the authorities deliver on a promise to investigate all unsolved killings, including the assassination of Shahib Al-Timimi, and the federation has called on United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the international community to do more to protect journalists and media in Iraq.
The IFJ General Secretary will reiterate this demand at a special meeting at UN headquarters in New York this week to discuss further steps to strengthen the United Nations Security Council resolution 1738, which was adopted in 2006, a measure championed by the IFJ and its member unions, that protects journalists in conflict zones.
***11.09.08. GEORGIA-RUSSIA: War still having serious impact on freedom of expression (RSF)
The press freedom situation has deteriorated as a result of the fighting between Georgia and Russia, with many cases of journalists being obstructed and the Georgian population being denied its right to news and information, Reporters Without Borders said today.
“We condemn the press freedom violations that are continuing near the war zone,” Reporters Without Borders said. “All parties must ensure that journalists are able to operate in the best manner possible.”
A TV crew working for the Polish public television service Polska TV and their Georgian driver were arrested by members of an Ossetian militia when they tried to enter South Ossetia from Georgia without adequate accreditation on 8 September. After being handed over to the Russian army, they were released the next day and their equipment was returned to them.
Cameraman Georgi Ramishvili of the Georgian TV station Rustavi 2 was killed by a stray bullet while doing a report on a Georgian army base near Shavnabada (30 km south of Tbilisi) on 6 September, Rustavi 2 and another Georgian TV station, Imedi, reported. The authorities did not comment on his death.
A reporter for the Georgian human rights website Humanrights.ge, Saba Tsitsikashvili, was physically attacked while covering a Stop Russia demonstration in Gori on 1 September. He told journalists that the city’s governor and deputy went up to him and slapped him, telling him that it would be “like that every day from now on.” The deputy governor had insulted Tsitsikashvili on 24 August, several days after he wrote about inadequacies in the humanitarian aid being provided by the Georgian authorities.
Russian soldiers tried to confiscate a Rustavi 2 TV crew’s equipment near the western city of Zugdidi on 7 September and then, after getting orders to arrest the crew, began leading them at gunpoint towards their base. They were finally released after United Nations observers intervened and managed to defuse the tension.
Access to news and information continues to be very limited in Georgia. Russian cable TV stations and websites with addresses ending in .ru have been inaccessible since the outbreak of the fighting on 8 August. Temur Yakobashvili, the minister for reintegration, publicly claimed responsibility for blocking Russian TV broadcasts in Georgia.
“We call on the Georgian authorities to restore access to all news outlets, including Russian ones,” Reporters Without Borders said.
Almost all of the Georgian TV stations support President Mikhail Saakashvili and the only opposition station, Kavkasia, is having difficulty broadcasting. Transmission of its daily programme “Spektr” was cut short on 1 September as guest political analysts were criticising the Georgian position, pointing out that the country had lost 20 per cent of its territory and there was “no reason to rejoice.”
The official explanation for the loss of signal was a technical problem with a transmitter, but Kavkasia director Nino Jangirashvili told journalists: “I have serious doubts about this version.”
One of Georgia’s most popular discussion websites, Forum.ge, was briefly closed by the authorities. When it reopened, site administrators posted recommendations asking users to make every effort to avoid another closure by refraining from comments “harming the interests of the state” or “liable to lead to a split in the country.” The site’s political discussion sections were “briefly closed” again on 3 September.
***19.08.08.Mexico : World Journalists’ Report on Press Freedom Warns Of “Shocking Culture of Impunity” and Violence
An international coalition of press freedom organisations reported on 18 August that the last three years have been incredibly dangerous for media working in Mexico. The coalition’s report “Press Freedom: Shadow of Impunity and Violence” highlights the range of risks that they face with attacks against journalists continuing to increase at alarming rates.
“Mexico has been one of the most dangerous countries for journalists in recent years where a shocking culture of impunity has led to the number of murders there going up even as the killings of media staff in other Latin American countries go down,” said a spokesperson for the coalition. “The Mexican government must make protection of journalists a top priority and modernise the effectiveness of federal and state authorities to investigate these cases and bring the killers to justice.”
In the last 8 years, at least 24 journalists and media workers have been killed, 8 have disappeared and dozens have been threatened or attacked in direct reprisal for their work. The majority of these cases continue to be met with impunity, a situation that has led to a general state of self-censorship.
13 international press freedom and freedom of expression organisations formed an international coalition which undertook a mission to Mexico, from 20-25 April 2008, to analyse the situation of journalists and media outlets in the country, in order to work together with Mexican organisations to improve the conditions faced by journalists and the media at large.
The International Coalition’s mission report shows that the main obstacles for the free exercise of journalism in Mexico are: organised crime, which has generated a climate of fear; corruption; impunity; direct attacks by the police and military forces; and the lack of political will on the part of federal and state governments to resolve cases of assaults on journalists and to guarantee their safety.
The report details the pressing need to create and strengthen mechanisms to prevent attacks and to protect the press. The recommended measures include the training of officials whose responsibility it is to combat crime. Much still needs to be done in order to address what the mission identified as one of the most important challenges facing the Mexican government: impunity in cases of killings, “disappearances”, and assaults on journalists, which represents one of the most extreme forms of censorship and which intensifies when there is no punishment of those responsible.
Although the findings of the mission are deeply concerning, they laid the foundations for understanding the situation which prevails in Mexico, and made it clear that it would be necessary for the mission to return to the country early in 2009 as part of the mandate which it has developed for future action.
***18.08.08. UNESCO Director-General condemns violence against journalists in conflict in Georgia and urges respect for media safety
The Director-General of UNESCO, Koïchiro Matsuura, today condemned the killing of journalists in the conflict that took place in Georgia, and recalled the obligation under international law to respect the civilian status of reporters.
Mr Matsuura also joined United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in his call for “safe and unimpeded access for humanitarian actors to all conflict-affected areas.”
In his statement, Mr Matsuura referred to the killing of Dutch cameraman Stan Storimans, of RTL television; Alexander Klimchuk, a Georgian photojournalist working for Russian news agency Itar-Tass; and of Grigol Chikhladze, also Georgian, of Russian Newsweek. There have also been reports of the killing of an unnamed Georgian journalist and his driver.
“I condemn the killing of Stan Storimans, Alexander Klimchuk and Grigol Chikhladze,” the Director-General said. “I am also deeply concerned about reports concerning other journalists who were injured in the recent conflict. In such times, it is essential that the authorities abide by international law which affirms the civilian status of war reporters. I call on the authorities to investigate these cases and take appropriate action,” Mr Matsuura said.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) reported that Stan Storimans was killed on 11 August in Gori, where, it reported, an unnamed Georgian journalist was killed the following day along with his driver.
Alexander Klimchuk and Grigol Chikhladze were also killed while covering the conflict in South Ossetia, according to the Committee for the protection of journalists, which said that two other journalists travelling in the same car as the deceased were injured in the attack.
The IFJ further quoted the editor-in-chief of Expert Magazine , V.A. Fadeev, as saying that staff member Vyacheslav V. Kochetkov and Igor V. Naidenov, a reporter for the Russian Reporter magazine, had not been heard from since they crossed the border into Georgia on 9 August.
Le Directeur général de l’UNESCO condamne la violence contre les journalistes dans le conflit en Géorgie et demande le respect de la sécurité de la presse
Paris 18 août – Le Directeur général de l’UNESCO, Koïchiro Matsuura, a condamné aujourd’hui la mort de plusieurs journalistes dans le conflit qui se déroule actuellement en Géorgie et rappelle que la loi internationale oblige à respecter le statut de civil des reporters.
M. Matsuura se joint également à l’appel de Secrétaire général de l’ONU, Ban Ki-moon, pour « un accès sûr et sans obstacles de tous les acteurs humanitaires aux zones affectées par des conflits ».
Dans sa déclaration, M. Matsuura fait référence à la mort du caméraman néerlandais Stan Storimans, de la télévision RTL, Alexander Klimchuk, un photo-journaliste géorgien travaillant pour l’agence de presse russe Itar-Tass et Grigol Chikhladze, également Géorgien, travaillant pour l’édition russe de Newsweek . On a aussi rapporté la mort d’un journaliste Géorgien anonyme et de son chauffeur.
« Je condamne la mort de Stan Storimans, d’Alexander Klimchuk et de Grigol Chikhladze, a déclaré le Directeur général. Je m’inquiète également profondément car des rapports parlent d’autres journalistes blessés dans le récent conflit. Dans de tels moments, il est essentiel que les autorités se conforment aux lois internationales conférant le statut de civil aux reporters de guerre. J’appelle les autorités à enquêter sur ces décès et à prendre les mesures appropriées. »
La Fédération internationale des journalistes (IFJ) rapporte que Stan Storimans a été tué le 11 août à Gori où un journaliste Géorgien anonyme a également été tué, en même temps que son chauffeur.
Alexander Klimchuk et Grigol Chikhladze sont morts alors qu’ils couvraient le conflit en Ossétie du Sud, indique le Comité pour la protection des journalistes qui rapporte également que deux autres journalistes, qui voyageaient dans la même voiture que les victimes, ont été blessés lors de l’attaque.
De plus, l’IFJ rapporte que le rédacteur-en-chef d’Expert Magazine , V.A. Fadeev, a indiqué que l’on était sans nouvelles du membre de l’équipe Vyacheslav V. Kochetkov et d’Igor V. Naidenov, un reporter de l’édition russe du magazine Reporter , depuis qu’ils avaient traversé la frontière de la Géorgie, le 9 août.
***15.08.08. IFJ Condemns Israeli Report on Media Killing (READ ALSO BELOW: CPJ, INSI, RSF, MADA, PCHR statements)
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today warned that the results of an Israeli Army investigation clearing a tank crew of any wrong-doing in the killing of Reuters' cameraman Fadel Shana in April in the Gaza Strip could endanger all media professionals working in the Palestinian Territories.
"This inquiry, which has been farcical in its nature, is likely to make life even more dangerous for journalists working in the field," said IFJ General Secretary Aidan White. "We have no confidence in an inquiry that has been used by the Israeli Army to avoid facing up to the consequences of its irresponsible actions. We share Reuters' concern that there has been a terrible injustice here and that the Israeli authorities have failed to take action."
Reuters said it was told by the Israeli Defence Forces' Military Advocate-General that "troops could not see whether Shana was operating a camera or a weapon but were nonetheless justified in firing a shell packed with darts that killed him and eight other Palestinians aged between 12 and 20."
"This report is untenable because it does not meet any test of what is necessary for a legitimate independent inquiry into these tragic killings," White said. "As usual we have an army investigating itself without proper independent review."
The IFJ is calling on the Israeli government and the international community to intervene in this case and ensure that a full, independent inquiry is carried out.
The IFJ fears that any media staff carrying bulky camera equipment or attempting to use such equipment will now become potential targets. The IFJ is further concerned that this case fails to meet the call from the United Nations Security Council in December 2006 for an end to impunity in the killing of journalists and proper investigation of deadly attacks against media.
UN Security Council resolution 1738 says that journalists in conflict zones are considered civilian non-combatants and that any targeting of journalists may be considered a war crime.
CPJ: Israeli army decision endangers journalists in Gaza By Robert Mahoney
Fadel Shana (Reuters)In the Gaza Strip, anyone with a camera is fair game. That's the inescapable conclusion from the Israeli army's investigation into why one of its tank crews fired at least two shells at a Reuters television journalist openly filming them from a mile away.
The cameraman, Fadel Shana, 24, filmed the muzzle flash of the Merkava-4 tank that sent a dart-scattering shell above his head. The screen goes black as Shana falls dead in an open patch of sandy ground near the Israel-Gaza border, southwest of Gaza City on April 16. His soundman, Wafa Abu Mizyed, is wounded. Eight other civilians, aged between 12 and 20, were killed; six of them were under 16. At least seven other bystanders aged from 10 to 18 were also hit. None was armed or was a militant.
In a six-page letter to Thomson Reuters dated August 12, the Israel Defense Forces' (IDF) military advocate general, Brig.-Gen. Avihai Mandelblit, absolves the tank crew and their superiors of any responsibility or criminal wrongdoing. The letter outlines some of the findings of a confidential inquiry into the killing. It skates over testimony from witnesses quoted by Reuters and other media and human rights groups, and concludes that the decision to fire a shell designed to kill concentrations of battlefield infantry at a two-man TV crew was "reasonable" and "sound." General Mandelblit essentially blames the victim. What do you expect if you drive a vehicle with clear press markings to a patch of uninhabited ground, get out wearing blue body armor with the word "Press" emblazoned on it, slowly set up a tripod and camera and film two tanks 1.4 kilometers (about a mile) away? The answer, according to this report, is that you should expect to come across as a clear threat to the men inside one of the best armored main battle tanks in operation today.
I worked as Reuters bureau chief in Israel and the Palestinian Territories for seven years in the 1990s. I did not know Fadel Shana and I have no connection with Reuters now. Like any journalist running a news operation in Israel, I had many dealings with the IDF, particularly in regard to their treatment of locally hired journalists covering their presence in the West Bank, Gaza, and south Lebanon. It is with that experience that I read the general's letter.
The underpinning of the general's argument that the tank crew's actions were reasonable is that the soldiers could not see press signs and assumed that a black object mounted on a tripod posed a threat to them. The soldiers were on heightened alert because another IDF tank had been hit by a rocket-propelled grenade, albeit miles away, and three Israeli soldiers had been killed in separate incident earlier that day.
"The tank crew did not spot any markings on the vehicle or clothing worn by the persons spotted," the investigation concluded. Here are some facts garnered from reporting and interviews with eye-witnesses and military experts by media outlets and human rights researchers.
Both Reuters journalists and their Mitsubishi SUV carried clear press markings. The journalists were wearing blue body armor, the standard color for civilians, with "Press" written on it. The Merkava tank is equipped with state-of-the art optics and an Israeli Elbit Systems battle management system. There were two tanks on the ridge overlooking Shana's TV position, one spotting, and the other firing. Both the tank commander and gunner have separate optical systems. Did all four soldiers fail to spot press markings from 1.4 kilometers away? The standard training distance for gunnery practice in the IDF is 3.9 kilometers.
Shana had been on assignment in the area for many hours filming the aftermath of an Israeli airstrike that killed many Palestinians including children. Just 20 minutes before the fatal shelling, he had passed within 700 meters (766 yards) of the tanks. The TV markings on his car were clearly visible. An unmanned observation drone was circling the area.
The IDF report said, "The tank commander requested authorization to fire at persons identified from a distance, whose behavior was suspicious and who had been spotted affixing to a tripod a large black unidentified object and directing it at the tank." The report said the commander believed the object could be an anti-tank missile or mortar. It said for reasons it could not disclose, recordings of the communication between IDF forces in the area at the time had not been made.
The way Shana behaved would not lead to the conclusion that he was about to fire an anti-tank missile. He set up his tripod in the open. He made no attempt to hide behind an embankment or vegetation.
The IDF report acknowledges that he filmed for four minutes before the tank fired. Witnesses said he had set up his tripod at head height (he was more than 6 feet tall), standard procedure for such a camera shoot. That is more than twice the height for a tripod-mounted anti-tank weapon where the person firing lies or on ground or sits.
Also, there are no published reports of Palestinian militants ever firing such an anti-tank weapon at Israeli forces in Gaza. Israeli sources have been quoted as saying they feared Hamas might have acquired Soviet weaponry from Hezbollah in south Lebanon, which had used it against the IDF in 2006. But no journalists had seen it in Gaza.
The IDF added that both journalists were wearing body armor "common to Palestinian terrorists." Again, journalists covering the conflict in the Gaza Strip say militants do not usually wear flak jackets.
The general's letter leaves too many questions unanswered.
Why was the tank crew authorized to fire such a lethal weapon as a flechette shell in an area with civilians at a target it could not identify? Why did commanders not issue a warning before firing? Why did the tanks not take evasive action if they felt threatened?
There are many other chilling questions, including the unthinkable: Did the crew suspect that Shana was a journalist but fired anyway?
The upshot of this whole tragedy is that raising a camera in Gaza as a journalist could get you killed. That's the fear of the Foreign Press Association in Israel.
"We hope that the army's conclusion does not give soldiers free license to fire without being sure of the target, thereby hindering the media's ability to cover the conflict," it said.
Without a full, independent inquiry into this incident and an overhaul of IDF rules of engagement, such fears might be realized.
INSI calls for independent inquiry into Israeli killing of Gaza cameraman
Brussels, 14 August - The International News Safety Institute on Thursday expressed dissatisfaction with an Israeli military report on the killing of a Reuters cameraman in Gaza and called on the government to institute an independent inquiry for the sake of the safety of all journalists covering the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
Israel's senior military advocate-general said in a letter to Reuters that a tank crew which fired on Fadel Shana four months ago feared his camera, mounted on a tripod, might have been an anti-tank missile or a mortar.
Shana 24, and eight other Palestinian bystanders aged between 12 and 20 were killed on 16 April when the tank fired a shell packed with flechettes, or steel darts. INSI is disturbed by the report on several grounds which have serious implications for the safety of all journalists covering fighting between the IDF and Palestinians, already one of the most dangerous jobs for the news media in the world: It is barely credible that a tank crew with high magnification spotting equipment could mistake a tall, spindly camera tripod for a support for an anti-tank missile launcher. How is it that the tank crew was unable to make out the large PRESS markings on the journalists and their vehicle. The position of the cameraman when he was fired on is disputed. The assertion in the report that Palestinian "terrorists" wear similar body armour to journalists is questionable. Gaza journalists say they have rarely seen militants wear flak jackets. The firing was by admission deliberate and premeditated in a civilian area and the munitions used, flechettes, are designed to scatter widely and indiscriminately Journalists on the scene said there were no hostilities at the time. An official investigation into the incident was conducted by an Israeli Army Colonel, a case of the military investigating itself. Reuters, the Foreign Press Association in Israel and the respected Committee to Protect Journalists have all raised serious questions about the report. Reuters says it is deeply disturbed by a conclusion it said would severely curtail the freedom of the media covering the conflict by effectively giving soldiers a free hand to kill without being sure they were firing on journalists.
"This report lacks credibility," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "More questions are raised than are answered.
"We call on the Israeli government to institute a full, open and independent inquiry. This is the only way critical matters can be addressed to the satisfaction of Shana's family and colleagues and the wider news media, and vital safety lessons learned by journalists and the military."
INSI reminds Israel of its obligations under UN Resolution 1738 to ensure the safety of journalists and civilians in armed conflict.
The resolution recalls that all parties to an armed conflict bear primary responsibility to take all feasible steps to ensure the protection of civilians in the battle zone. INSI is not convinced by the Military Advocate General's letter that all feasible steps were taken in this case.
INSI urges the IDF to meet swiftly with representatives of the news media covering the Israel-Palestine conflict to discuss safety issues raised by this and other violent incidents involving the news media and the IDF over recent years with a view to improving operational procedures.
INSI holds itself ready to facilitate such discussions if required.
"At the very least the IDF needs to review and update its operational procedures to allow for greater safety for journalists in the battle space, and a dialogue with the news media is vital to understanding," Pinder said.
"It is not acceptable for properly trained soldiers, equipped with highly sophisticated surveillance and spotting equipment, to confuse a camera with an anti-tank missile. If this were to become a valid excuse, it would put all cameramen in grave danger as they try to perform their duties in warfare."
For further information about this news release please contact INSI Director Rodney Pinder, email rodney.pinder@newssafety.org , mobile +44 7734 709 267
Israeli Response to Death of Reuters Cameraman Makes Journalists Legitimate IOF Targets (PCHR)
The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) strongly condemns the official response of the Israeli military Advocate-General to the death of a Reuters cameraman and three other civilians, including two children, who were killed in Juhor al-Dik in the central Gaza Strip, on April 16, 2008. The cameraman, Fadel Shana’a, and the other civilians were killed by an Israeli tank crew, who, according to Israeli military advocate-general, Brigadier General Avihai Mendelblit, acted properly and will therefore not face any legal action for killing these four unarmed civilians.
PCHR believes this response once again underlines the chronic failure of the State of Israel and its Occupation Forces to conducts proper investigations into the hundreds of crimes they have committed against Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). This willful failure increases the urgent need to prosecute suspected perpetrators internationally, and reinforces the importance of PCHR’s efforts to utilize universal jurisdiction. PCHR notes with concern that since the beginning of the Second Intifada in September 2000, Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) have killed 9 journalists, including 2 international journalists, and in addition have injured at least 170 journalists and other media workers who were reporting on the OPT.
On Tuesday, 12 August, Reuters news agency received a letter from Brigadier General Avihai Mendelblit, in which he stated that the Israeli troops in Juhor Al-Dik could not see whether Fadel Shana’a was operating a camera or brandishing a weapon. In his letter to Reuters, Mendelblit claimed that “The tank crew was unable to determine the nature of the object mounted on the tripod, and positively identify it as [either] an anti-tank missile, a mortar or a television camera.” Mendelblit also wrote that “In light of the reasonable conclusion reached by the tank crew and its superiors that the characters were hostile, and were carrying an object most likely to be a weapon, the decision to fire at the target… was sound…”
Investigations conducted by PCHR immediately after the 16 April attack in Juhor Al-Dik strongly refute these claims, and proved beyond all reasonable doubt that Israeli Occupation Forces willfully killed journalist Shana’a and the three other civilians who died alongside him. In addition, another nine unarmed civilians, including six children, died in Juhor al-Dik village in an IOF missile attack that was launched earlier the same day. A total of 13 unarmed Palestinian civilians, including 8 children, were killed in the area of Juhor Al-Dik on 16 April. In addition, thirty two civilians, including seventeen children, were injured.
The letter from Brigadier General Avihai Mendelblit to Reuters concerned the second attack in Juhor al-Dik, which killed Fadel Shan’a, two children and a second adult civilian. According to investigations conducted by PCHR, Fadel Shana’a and his colleague, Wafa Abu Mezyed, a Reuters soundman, arrived at Juhor al-Din area at 17:00, an hour after an IOF missile attack in the village had killed 9 Palestinian civilians, including 6 children. The two men were wearing bullet proof vests emblazoned with the word “PRESS.” In his eye-witness testimony to PCHR, Wafa Abu Mezyed stated:
“When we arrived at Juhor al-Dik area at 5pm, the dead children had just been evacuated by ambulances… We filmed the site of the attack and then got back into our vehicle, which was daubed with the word REUTERS, and drove out of the village. We could see two tanks and a bulldozer, and we deliberately parked more than one and a half kilometers away from them for our own safety. Fadel got out of the jeep in order to continue filming… A small crowd of children gathered around us wanting to know what we were filming, and Fadel asked me to get out of the jeep too and shoo them away. I started to move the children out of his way. Fadel and I were standing just three meters apart when I heard an explosion. I saw Fadel and two of the boys fall to the ground. I threw myself on the ground too. From where I lay, I could see that Fadel and the two boys were dead and bleeding.”
Fadel Shana’a, 14-year-old Ahmed ‘Aaref Farajallah and 17-year-old Ghassan Khaled Abu ‘Otaiwi, were all killed by the shell fired by the IOF tank. Less than a minute later, the IOF tank fired a second shell that completely destroyed the REUTERS vehicle. Wafa Abu Mezyed saw two children flung into the air by the force of the second explosion, which killed another civilian, 22-year-old Khalil Isma’il Dughmosh.
PCHR condemns the Israeli Advocate-General’s response:
1) However, PCHR was not surprised by this response, which further reflects the chronic failure of the State of Israel and its occupation forces to properly investigate hundreds of crimes they have committed against civilians in the OPT, including dozens of crimes against journalists.
2) PCHR reiterates its position that there is absolutely no trust in military investigations conducted by IOF, who themselves commit war crimes against the Palestinian people. The Centre stresses that an Independent Investigation Commission must be established immediately.
3) PCHR reiterates its position that current investigations, which lack all minimum standards of transparency and impartiality, are a means to cover war crimes and provide legal protection and impunity to those suspected of perpetrating such crimes.
4) PCHR believes that this case further increases the need to prosecute Israeli war criminals using universal jurisdiction.
5) PCHR believes the response of the Israeli Advocate-General response renders local and international journalists easy and legitimate targets for IOF, especially whilst journalists are reporting on incursions and military operation in the OPT. This decision indicates that journalists can be fired on by IOF troops simply based on an apparent suspicion concerning the filming equipment they may be carrying.
For more information please call PCHR office in Gaza , Gaza Strip, on +972 8 2824776 - 2825893
Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) - Acquittal of Shana'a killers is green light for more killings and attacks on journalists
The Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) expresses grave concern at the decision of the Israeli military general Prosecutor, not to take legal action against the tank crew responsible for the murder of Reuters cameraman Fadel Shana'a and wounding his assistant Wafa Abu Mezyed on 16/4/2008, in Juhr Al-Deek area in Gaza Strip, despite the fact that the crime appeared to have been committed deliberately for the following reasons outlined in Mada report about media freedoms violations during last April, namely: Because the area in which the crime was committed had no presence of armed Palestinians. Because the area where the crime was committed had not witnessed armed clashes between Israeli forces and Palestinian gunmen. Because the car was clearly marked press in large letters. Because the tank which fired at the car was able to distinguish Fadel and the car, due to sophisticated equipment it contains. Because two shells were launched at the car in order to make sure it hit its target. Mada center condemns the acquittal of Shana'a killers, and considers it as a provocation to the feelings of journalists and all concerned in human life and rights, and is further proof of the lack of seriousness of the Israeli commissions of inquiry established to investigate crimes of attacks on journalists, and a green light for more killings and attacks on them. Mada stresses the need for the formation of a neutral international commission of inquiry into Shana'a murder. ------ Contact: Mousa Rimawi Ramallah Mada Coordinator info@madacenter.org madapalestine@yahoo.com http://www.madacenter.org
RSF: Mort d’un cameraman palestinien : la commission d’enquête israélienne décide sans surprise de ne pas sanctionner les soldats impliqués Reporters sans frontières est indignée par les conclusions de l’enquête israélienne, sur la mort du cameraman palestinien Fadel Shanaa, qui dédouane totalement les soldats auteurs des tirs de toute responsabilité. Le 13 août 2008, le procureur général de l’armée, brigadier-général Avihai Mendelblit, a adressé un courrier à l’agence de presse britannique Reuters, employeur de Fadel Shanaa, faisant état des conclusions de l’enquête israélienne. Selon lui, les soldats auteurs des tirs ont respecté les règles d’engagements. A ce titre, aucune poursuite judiciaire ne sera engagée contre eux.
"L’équipe du char n’était pas en mesure de déterminer la nature de l’objet monté sur le trépied, ni de l’identifier en tant que missile anti-char, mortier, ou camera de télévision", a indiqué le général. "Les soldats dans le char et leurs supérieurs ont conclu que ces individus [les journalistes de Reuters] représentaient une menace et transportaient un objet pouvant être une arme. Leur décision de tirer sur cette cible était donc la bonne", a-t-il ajouté. Selon lui, les soldats étaient trop loin pour pouvoir déchiffrer les bandeaux "presse" affichés sur le véhicule ou les gilets pare-balles de Fadel Shanaa et de son preneur de son, Wafa Abu Mizyed, légèrement blessé dans l’attaque.
"Les conclusions de l’enquête israéliennes sont déroutantes et n’apportent aucune explication convaincante aux circonstances qui ont conduit à la mort du cameraman de Reuters. Les forces de défense israéliennes n’ont jamais voulu reconnaître leurs torts dans des affaires similaires. Les soldats israéliens bénéficient d’une impunité qui met en danger les nombreux journalistes qui couvrent leurs activités. Seule une analyse impartiale de ce qui s’est passé pourrait prévenir d’autres drames. Au lieu de rassurer la presse, les responsables de l’armée créent un climat d’insécurité inacceptable", a déclaré Reporters sans frontières.
"Le port d’un gilet-pare-balles par les journalistes, le maintien à une distance raisonnable des bélligérants et l’identification claire de leur statut doivent s’accompagner d’une évolution du comportement des soldats qui se trouvent dans des zones où se trouvent des civils, dont des journalistes", a ajouté l’organisation.
Fadel Shanaa, 23 ans, cameraman palestinien de l’agence de presse Reuters a été tué par un obus tiré par un char israélien le 16 avril 2008 alors qu’il filmait une incursion de l’armée israélienne dans la bande de Gaza. Son preneur de son, Wafa Abu Mizyed, a été blessé. Les deux hommes, qui se trouvaient à près d’un kilomètre du char, portaient des gilets pare-balles inefficaces contre les fléchettes en acier libérées par l’obus israélien.
***15.08.08. GEORGIA/RUSSIA: FOUR JOURNALISTS KILLED, OTHERS INJURED IN SOUTH OSSETIA CONFLICT (IFEX/PEC/ARTICLE 19)
Four journalists were among hundreds killed in fighting between Russia and Georgia that began on 8 August 2008. Meanwhile a fierce cyber-war between the two countries resulted in blocked websites and television stations.
Cameraman Stan Storimans of Dutch television RTL-4 died and the station's Moscow correspondent was injured during Russian bombing of the Georgian town of Gori on 12 August, said Reporters Without Borders (RSF). Earlier in the day, RSF and the International News Safety Institute (INSI) reported that an unnamed Georgian reporter and his driver were killed when a shell hit their vehicle in Gori's main square.
One day earlier, Giga Chikhladze, head of Alania TV, and Alexander Klimchuk, head of the Caucasus Press Images agency and a correspondent for Itar-Tas, were killed in the breakaway republic of South Ossetia, apparently at a roadblock of pro-independence fighters. Russian "Newsweek" reporter Orkhan Dzhemal said the journalists were attacked by South Ossetian militia after entering the conflict zone from Georgia, reported the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
At least nine journalists - including five Russians, two Turks and two from the Tbilisi-based English-language newspaper "The Messenger" - have been injured, CPJ said. RSF added that Russian military detained four Turkish television journalists, two each from NTV and Kanalturk, for several hours on 12 August.
The conflict was fought online as well as in the field, after Georgia attacked South Ossetia on 7 August and Russia retaliated. Weapons included filtering and distributed-denial-of-service attacks, in which millions of connection requests overloaded and crashed websites' servers.
Russian hackers attacked Georgian government sites, including those of President Mikheil Saakashvili and the foreign ministry, which moved to a commercial blogging site. Many Georgian online news media are also blocked, including Rustavi 2, Civil.ge, Media.ge and Interpressnews.ge Civil.ge reportedly relocated to a blogging domain of Google, which denied an accusation that it had removed data about Georgia.
Georgian authorities decided on 11 August to "combat disinformation" by cutting all access to Russian TV station broadcasts. Georgia's leading Internet service provider (ISPs), Caucasus Online, blocked access to the main Russian-language news websites by filtering the Russian domain name ".ru".
Russian hackers have also attacked Day.az and ANS.az, two regional news portals based in Azerbaijan.
RSF condemned the many violations of online freedom of information. "With newspapers and radio and TV stations putting out very little independent news, the Internet is a vital tool for the public, so these attacks must stop at once."
Visit these other links: - RSF on killings: http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=28147 - CPJ: http://tinyurl.com/5saea3 - International News Safety Institute: http://www.newssafety.com/ - RSF Internet: http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=28167 - ARTICLE 19 report on Russian coverage of North Caucasus conflicts (PDF): http://tinyurl.com/69q7f7 - Google embroiled in conflict: http://tinyurl.com/62za5t - Russian bloggers at the front: http://tinyurl.com/6yzfuw - Russia claims media bias: http://tinyurl.com/5d3u3g ARTICLE 19, 6-8 Amwell Street, London EC1R 1UQ
Conflict in South Ossetia: Lack of Transparency and the Restricted Flow of Information Fuel the Conflict and Hamper Long Term Peace ARTICLE 19 is very concerned with the obstructions placed on the free flow of information, including through the targeting of media professionals, in the South Ossetia conflict, and insists that any long term prospect for peace requires an information regime respecting diversity and pluralism.
Heavy civilian casualties have been reported as a result of the conflict in the disputed region of South Ossetia. Reports of civilian dead and wounded vary, with numbers and circumstances difficult to independently verify, due to difficulties in accessing the region and the on-going fighting, and presence of troops.
The lack of verifiable information is fuelling mistrust, misrepresentation and disinformation, thus exacerbating tensions and fueling the conflict. Populations from all sides in the conflict and refugees are experiencing many difficulties in accessing factual information about the events and the whereabouts of their loved ones.
Truth and freedom of expression are some of the first and greatest casualties of war. The South Ossetian conflict has been no exception.
· At least five local and international news staff have been killed and another ten wounded.
· Early in the conflict, the Georgian government banned the transmission of Russian television into Georgia due to the alleged use of propaganda to justify the conflict.
· News reports on both sides of the conflict are replete with rumours, allegations and counter-allegations of ethnic cleansing, genocide, and other intensely worded crimes which demonise the other side and deepen hostilities.
· There are also numerous reports of interference with websites. Hackers have reportedly infiltrated several government sites, replacing content with propaganda. One report claims that hackers altered the front page of the Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs website to show pictures of President Mikheil Saakashvili interspersed with images of Adolf Hitler. Russian websites have reportedly also been infiltrated.
Respect for freedom of expression and freedom of the press, and the free flow of information will be an invaluable and essential element in the effective implementation of the cease-fire and the promotion of peace.
“ARTICLE 19’s work in conflict regions, including in the so-called frozen conflicts, has shown that access to comprehensive and accurate information increases people’s sense of security whilst the lack of reliable information fuels insecurity. Information is also fundamental to resolving key concerns in the aftermath of conflict, such as ensuring respect for human rights, government accountability and achieving sustainable peace.” said Dr. Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 executive director.
The free flow of information is an essential foundation for the wider debate on the nature of the conflict and broader issues of accountability, both of which are critical in addressing the root causes of the conflict. Freedom of expression is also necessary for adequate reporting on the conflict itself and for addressing human rights abuses, both as a cause of the conflict and a factor perpetuating it. So is an independent and professional media, able to report freely and without fears. This requires the removal of all administrative, economic and political pressures, and the tight state-control of information, the end to the persecution of journalists who have not conformed to the system, better training and self-regulation.
ARTICLE 19 calls on Georgia and Russia to fully respect their international obligations on freedom of expression and the free flow of information.
ARTICLE 19 calls on the international community to insist that any long term prospects for the region is largely dependent on an information regime that maximises diversity of views, investigative reporting, and a free flow of information, and to support the right of the media to operate independently and free of political pressures.
***13.08.08. UPDATE CHINA: CENSORSHIP AND PROTESTS AS OLYMPICS OPEN (IFEX/PEC)
The Beijing Olympics opened on 8 August 2008 amid a swirl of controversy about Chinese censorship of human rights websites and activists - and continuing protests by free expression advocates around the world.
Despite some relaxation of controls, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) reported on 12 August that its website, www.cpj.org, was blocked in the main Olympic press centre and at least one other press venue. Earlier international reports said certain previously censored sites, such as of Amnesty International, became available after widespread protests.
ARTICLE 19 condemned Olympics organisers as well as the Chinese government. Not only have promises to improve human rights standards been broken, said 2executive director Agnès Callamard, the situation deteriorated in the run-up to the games. Human rights organisations have documented "what amounts to an acceleration in human rights violations," including censorship and other attacks on media freedom, and crackdown against human rights defenders and Tibetan protesters.
"To many of us within the human rights community, it seems that human rights, including freedom of expression, have been sacrificed on the altar of corporate sponsorship and market share; a sacrifice presided over by the International Olympic Committee (IOC)." While the Chinese government is directly responsible for its broken promises, "the IOC's quiet, callous if not cynical disregard for human rights" should also be highlighted.
The benefit of speaking out was demonstrated just before the games, ARTICLE 19 argued, when dissenting IOC voices and "the increasing public uproar" forced China to ease censorship of foreign journalists' access to English-language Internet sites.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and CPJ report that on 13 August, security officers roughed up John Ray, a British journalist working for Independent Television News (ITN), after he filmed protestors holding a "Free Tibet" banner close to the Bird Nest Olympic venue in Beijing.
Many Chinese activists remain in jail or under house arrest to keep them from speaking up about human rights violations surrounding the Olympics, reports Human Rights Watch.
In other news, two Japanese journalists covering the aftermath of a 4 August attack on border police in the western province of Kashgar were detained, beaten, and harassed, CPJ reported. IFJ says other journalists reported that police confiscated or forced journalists to delete film footage and photographs.
CAMPAIGNS:
Numerous free expression groups monitored Beijing, campaigned for free expression, and facilitated worldwide protests.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) clandestinely broadcast "Radio Without Borders" in Beijing hours before the opening ceremony on 8 August. In a 20-minute English, French and Mandarin programme heard on FM radios, RSF secretary-general Robert Ménard and Chinese human rights activists called on the Chinese government to respect free speech.
- RSF also sponsored a virtual demonstration "outside Beijing's Olympic Stadium" at http://tinyurl.com/5kfx4q
- ARTICLE 19 campaign: http://tinyurl.com/5peqp7
- PEN American Center's campaign for the release of 45 imprisoned writers and journalists culminated in New York on 7 August in "Bringing Down the Great Firewall of China: Silenced Writers Speak," co-sponsored by the Independent Chinese PEN Center and PEN Canada. See: http://www.pen.org/page.php/prmID/1527
- Olympic Watch publicly appealed to Olympic athletes to express themselves in support of people whose rights are being violated by the Chinese government. A statement endorsing the appeal rejects the notion that peaceful promotion of human rights constitutes political propaganda prohibited by the Olympic Charter. See: http://olympicwatch.org/news.php?id=124
- The Dalai Lama began the Olympic Handshake - a powerful, unambiguous message of peace, friendship and dialogue - that is travelling toward Beijing. See: http://tinyurl.com/69s8f4
- Human Rights Watch report "China: Olympics Harm Key Human Rights - Chinese Government, IOC Wasted Historic Opportunity for Reform": http://tinyurl.com/59tca5
- CPJ's blog covers press freedom concerns at the Olympics: http://www.cpj.org/blog/. CPJ also has a hotline at +852 6717 0591 for journalists facing censorship, threats, attacks, or other press freedom abuses.
- Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) released its first "China Human Rights Yearbook" this month. See: http://tinyurl.com/5qk3hv
- CHRD also published an "Alternative Guide to the Beijing Olympics", available in English at: http://tinyurl.com/6ju573. Part II, "How China Censors the Internet", is at http://tinyurl.com/666tj4
- In Canada, the Montreal-based International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development (Rights & Democracy) launched an online Olympic Journal on human rights at http://www.olympicjournal.ca/
- IFEX alerts: http://tinyurl.com/6fg5p3
***30.07.08. IFJ Calls on China to Grant Journalists Free Internet Access: “Censorship Has No Place at the Olympics"
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on the Chinese authorities to unblock certain Internet sites that have become unavailable for foreign journalists arriving in Beijing to cover the Olympic Games which begin in nine days.
“We learn with dismay from the Chinese government that some Internet sites are blocked”, said Aidan White, General Secretary of the IFJ. “This is a serious breach of the promise given that all journalists, particularly those in the Main Press Centre for the Games, would have unfettered access to the Internet. We demand that all restrictions are lifted so that our colleagues can work freely and search access to the information they need.”
The Chinese foreign ministry spokesman who admitted the Internet restrictions said they concerned the Falun Gong spiritual movement, but reporters working already in that country are also unable to seek information from sites such as those related to Tibet or Amnesty International.
Several thousand journalists are already in Beijing and they are complaining about the way certain sites are censored, either because they are unavailable or they prompt suspiciously slow download rates when attempting access.
“This is a bad start for journalism,” said White. “We call on the All China Journalists Association and the Chinese authorities to keep their promise and open the Internet to access by all journalists. Censorship has no place at the Olympic Games.”
The IFJ is also concerned that the IOC has apparently made an agreement with Chinese officials to allow censorship of Internet access for journalists. "This really does go against the promises that were made by all sides -- in both Beijing and by the IOC -- that journalists would not be subject to censorship," said White.
At the same time, the IFJ has called on the International Olympic Committee to put pressure on China to ensure that it keeps the Internet open to all by reminding the Chinese government about their undertakings to grant unrestricted access for the period of the Games.
***30.07.08. SOMALIA.Muzzling Freedom of the Press: Journalists in the Line of Fire with Impunity - Concise Six-Month Report
In the past six (6) months of 2008, a large number of Somali journalists and other media workers were subjected to various methods of violence and oppression such as harassment, killing, professional punishment, beatings, threats, arrests, arbitrary detention, maltreatment and censorship.
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) recorded numerous cases of attacks against media professionals and news media organisations particularly in Kismayu, Mogadishu, Galkayo, Bossasso, Baidoa, Beledweyne and Jowhar.
Journalist Hassan Kafi Hared was killed in Kismayo in January 2008, while his colleague Nasteh Dahir Farah, the Vice President of NUSOJ, was viciously and ruthlessly assassinated after four months in the same town. The perpetrators of these monstrous crimes were not punished and impunity is broadly prevailing in Somalia as these two most recent killings had deep impact in the hearts of Somali journalists.
Journalists were caught in an iron grip between the different parties to the conflict in southern regions. Repressive practices against journalists intensified and diversified in the past six months, though the number of killings in the first half of 2007 is more than those of this year.
Nine (9) journalists and three (3) other media workers were subjectively arrested in Mogadishu (4), Baidoa (3), Beledweyne (1), Jowhar (1) and Bossasso (3) as part of arbitrary nature of weakening courageousness and energy of journalists to tell the story for their people in fair and independent manner. These media people were not given enough explanations regarding the reasons for their detention.
5 media houses in Mogadishu and Beledweyne were briefly shutdown in the past six months as part of sophisticated intimidations. Some of the media managers called these moves as being a manoeuvre by the government to silence them, and to erode the role of private media.
Due to national and global outcry of attacks against media in Somalia for the year 2007, warring sides in south-central regions implemented pernicious tactics of terrorising journalists through phone calls and face-to-face interactions. At least 23 journalists were threatened to death in Baidoa, Mogadishu, Jowhar, Galkayo and Bossasso but some of these journalists were plainly ordered not to report such cases by the attackers, otherwise they would be killed. These journalists were told diverse accusations such as disseminating false information, undermining security, waging war against the authorities or cooperating with terrorists. Media managers were also subjected to various pressures as well as political and financial inducements to conceal certain information.
Aside from the assassination of Nasteh Dahir Farah, other union officials had to continue their activities in a tremendously tense climate because of their dedication to the promotion and protection of rights and interests of journalists.
Four journalists, two in Garowe and two in Mogadishu, whose independent reporting were not liked by Puntland authorities and officials of the Transitional Federal Government, were subjected to threats and severe hindrances to their journalistic tasks, particularly the offices of these two authorities.
The media law that was passed in December 2007 was not fundamentally reviewed and became applicable. The law has manifold legislative restrictions aiming at controlling and paralysing the privately owned media. It has also strict conditions for registration and broad interference from the Ministry of Information.
In relation to this media law, the Ministry of Information has extensive powers to interfere in National Media Council, approve and disapprove its members and therefore contributes to continuing a strict control over media organisations.
Journalist Mohammed Shidane Daban, who was arrested from Adan Adde International Airport in Mogadishu while travelling to abroad, was released after detaining him 115 days.
The Transitional Federal Parliament of Somalia publicly condemned on 24 July 2008 the attacks against journalists and humanitarian aid workers. The parliament demanded from the government to investigate attacks against media and aid workers and punish perpetrators.
Journalists disseminating information about leadership wrangles in Puntland were violently repressed. Renowned woman journalist was frequently threatened. Since the start of this year 11 journalists fled from their homes, 6 from Kismayu and 5 from Puntland.
There was no significant progress in the first half of 2008. Journalists are still widely vulnerable to reprisals. There is also a price to pay for reporting independently and without censorship. Media professionals are systematically exposed to physical attacks. Most serious crimes against journalists are not prosecuted and brought to trial, including the last two killings of Hassan Kafi and Nasteh Dahir.
Journalists learned that some of them who intended to report professionally were considered as sympathisers of one of the opposing forces, which makes journalists a target for a specific force.
Overall, the past six months of the year was marked by an upsurge in attacks on freedom of the press and safety of journalists, in spite of reduced number of journalists killed. -- For further information, contact: National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, tel/fax: +252 1 859 944, e-mail: newsletter@nusoj.org Internet: http://www.nusoj.org
***17.06.08. U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL HONOURS SLAIN BBC JOURNALISTS AT NEW MEMORIAL IN LONDON New York, Jun 16 2008 7:00PM Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon paid tribute today to the work of journalists in upholding the freedom of the press at the unveiling of a memorial in London to media professionals killed in the line of work.
A glass and steel sculpture entitled “Breathing,” which will project a beam of light up to one kilometre into the sky for 30 minutes each evening, has been officially dedicated on top of the new wing of the BBC Broadcasting House in the British capital.
Attending the unveiling, Mr. Ban <"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=3234">said it serves as “a solemn reminder of those who have lost their lives giving voice to the voiceless.
“It is the light that shines when journalists report stories which powerful interests are trying to cover up. It is a beacon of hope for millions of people who thirst for the truth. And it is the light of justice that courageous journalists fight for – and that we must obtain in cases where they have been killed.”
The UN chief called for renewed international efforts to “end the culture of impunity surrounding crimes against reporters” and to bring the perpetrators of such crimes to justice.
***16.06.08.U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL DEDICATES MEMORIAL TO JOURNALISTS IN LONDON (INSI report)
The Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, will pay tribute to journalists and crew killed upholding freedom of speech at an event in central London tonight (Monday 16 June). The Secretary-General will dedicate a light sculpture on top of the new wing of the BBC Broadcasting House building, which projects a beam of light up to one kilometre into the night sky, to the memory of journalists and news staff killed in the line of work.
The Secretary-General is guest of honour at the event which is co-hosted by the International News Safety Institute (INSI) and the BBC, to officially inaugurate the memorial, called ‘Breathing’. He will address a distinguished audience of politicians, journalists, former hostages and families of people killed in pursuit of reporting the news.
Tonight’s inauguration follows the recent deaths of two BBC journalists in Afghanistan and Somalia: Abdul Samad Rohani and Nasteh Dahir Faraah.
Rodney Pinder, Director of INSI, said: "These men and women are the unsung heroes of democracy, for without a free press there can be no freedom. This shaft of light in the capital of international journalism is a visual reminder of their sacrifice."
Introducing the Secretary-General, BBC Chairman Sir Michael Lyons said: “We are all reminded of the daily risks taken by journalists in some of the world’s most dangerous places. The implicit contract, whereby journalists place their lives at risk to help us understand the world and its events better, needs to be reaffirmed at moments like this. That sacrifice is properly valued and the loss is widely shared”.
Thanking Mr Ban Ki-moon for his continued personal commitment to freedom of expression and improving safety of all journalists and news teams working around the world, BBC Director-General, Mark Thompson said: “We should never forget or underestimate the risks that journalists reporting from hostile environments face. We hope this poignant memorial will serve as a nightly reminder of the sacrifice made by many in the cause of free expression and journalism”.
Eighteen months ago the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1738, which demanded action by member states to end violent attacks on the news media and end impunity for those who kill journalists.
An INSI study issued in March last year, found that every week, for the last ten years, at least two journalists or news staff have been killed trying to report the news; and in 90% of cases no-one is brought to justice.
‘Breathing’ and ‘Memorial’ poem
The sculpture, situated on the roof of the new wing of BBC Broadcasting House in Portland Place in London W1, is a glass and steel construction entitled ‘Breathing’ by the international artist Jaume Plensa. Every night, a light beam, extending one kilometre into the sky, will illuminate the sculpture for 30 minutes, in tandem with the BBC’s 10 o’clock news bulletin.
Selected after an international competition as part of the BBC’s public art programme for Broadcasting House, this artwork takes its inspiration from the audio life of the building (home to the BBC’s Audio & Music division) shaped as it is in the form of a giant, 10 metre high, listening glass. It also creates a ‘third spire’ in the trinity of spires made up by the BBC radio mast on the roof of the Grade II* listed Broadcasting House and the spire of the adjacent All Souls Church. The words which are inscribed around the sculpture in a spiral of continuous text evoke the antithetical themes of speech and silence, life and death. The sculpture is dedicated to news journalists killed on location.
The final form of ‘Breathing’ is the result of a dialogue between the artist Jaume Plensa, the Broadcasting House architect Sir Richard MacCormac and his team from MJP Architects, and public art consultants Modus Operandi The glass and steel construction of the sculpture has evolved through close collaboration between the artist, the architects and the engineers Whitby Bird & Partners.
In addition, the BBC commissioned a poem by ex-war correspondent and poet James Fenton, entitled ‘Memorial’. This poem complements the sculpture, remembering the bravery and self-sacrifice made by news journalists and their crews from news organisations across the world. The full text of the poem is included in the press pack.
Notes Over 200 reporters have lost their lives since the start of 2007. News staff are vulnerable not just in conflict zones but also to targeting from criminal and paramilitary groups. The International News Safety website contains further statistics and information about danger zones. http://www.newssafety.com/
Second BBC Reporter Killed in Media's "Horrifying Weekend"
The International Federation of Journalists says that the abduction and murder of a local journalist working for the BBC in Afghanistan's southern Helmand province is the latest in a series of media tragedies that underscores the need for comprehensive international action to confront the global crisis of violence against independent reporters.
Abdul Samad Rohani was kidnapped on Saturday and his body was found on Sunday afternoon in Lashkar Gah. Also on Saturday a leading journalist in Somalia was killed in another targeted shooting.
"It has been a horrifying weekend for journalists," said Jim Boumelha, IFJ President. "Two dedicated and courageous colleagues have been struck down doing their duty in the world's most troubled regions. Their deaths must inspire us to practical action to help protect journalists."
The IFJ sent a message of condolence to the BBC and Rohani's family and colleages. It was the second death of a BBC reporter over the weekend following the targeted shooting of Nasteh Dahir in Somalia.
The BBC said that Rohani worked with the BBC Kabul bureau and was the Pashto service reporter for the BBC World Service in Helmand where there has been considerable violence by Taleban insurgents. He is the fourth journalist to die in Afghanistan in the past year.
"We must find these killers and bring them to justice," said Boumelha.
On Monday the IFJ was joining journalists' leaders and government representatives at the headquarters of UNESCO in Paris to discuss a five-year global programme developed by the International News Safety Institute to improve protection for journalists.
UN OFFICIAL SPEAKS OUT AGAINST KILLING OF SOMALI JOURNALIST New York, Jun 9 2008 11:00AM The top United Nations humanitarian official for Somalia has expressed his shock and disappointment at the latest killing of a journalist in the strife-torn nation, the deadliest place in Africa for the media to work.
Nasteh Dahir Farah was fatally shot on 7 June by unknown gunmen in Kismayo. He had been working for the BBC and the Associated Press, and was also the vice chairman of the National Union of Somali Journalists.
In a statement issued today, Mark Bowden, the UN Humanitarian and Resident Coordinator for Somalia, noted that “members of civil society in Somalia – in particular the media – have been singled out for attack and assassination.”
Mr. Farah’s death brings to nine the number of journalists killed in Somalia in 2007-2008. He is the second reporter to be killed in Kismayo this year.
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Somalia is now the second-most dangerous country to be a journalist, behind only Iraq.
“It’s a tribute to the dedication and courage of journalists such as Mr. Farah, that despite the fact that members of the media are frequently targeted, harassed, arrested and killed in Somalia, he continued his work,” said Mr. Bowden. “Sadly, his dedication cost him his life.”
Somalia, which has not had a functioning national government since 1991, has witnessed deadly fighting in recent months, including in and around the capital, Mogadishu, which has seen an exodus of hundreds of thousands of civilian residents in the past year.
TARGETING JOURNALISTS ‘UNFORGIVABLE,’ UN SAYS AFTER DEATH OF BBC AFGHAN REPORTER New York, Jun 9 2008 12:00PM The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has expressed its sadness at the killing of an Afghan reporter working for the BBC in the country’s southern Helmand province, stressing it is “unforgivable” that journalists should be targeted for simply doing their jobs.
Abdul Samad Rohani was the Pashto service reporter for the BBC World Service in Helmand. He was reportedly abducted on Saturday and his body was found the next day in the provincial capital of Lashkar Gah.
“Afghan journalists risk their lives everyday to highlight the concerns and needs of ordinary Afghan people and it is unforgivable that such selfless individuals are being targeted for no other reason than doing their job,” UNAMA’s Nazifullah Salarzai told reporters in Kabul today.
“We urge the Afghan authorities to leave no stone unturned in search of those responsible for this callous murder,” he added.
Mr. Rohani was one of two BBC journalists killed over the weekend. Nasteh Dahir, who worked for the BBC and the Associated Press, was gunned down in Kismayo, Somalia, on Saturday.
Somalia: brutal assassination of Nasteh Dahir Farah (NUSOJ report - National Union of Somali Journalists is is a PEC member)
Nasteh Dahir Farah was assassinated by two men armed with pistols in Fanole village of Kismayo district on Saturday, 7th June 2008. He was returning home, when killers, who were following him, called his name and as he turned, the hooded attackers started shooting him at chest and stomach, leaving him dead. Bullets mutilated his stomach and chesty, according to his wife and doctor. Assailants escaped from the spot while the neighbours were quickening to take him to the hospital. Approximately 10 minutes after when he was admitted to hospital, medical staff declared Nasteh Dahir Farah dead due to blood loss.
So far the killers were not identified and no arrests were made for this gutless attack. Kismayo is the third main city of Somalia. It is controlled by clan militias and armed groups loyal to the Union of Islamic Courts. Clan leaders in Kismayo have history of persecuting individuals that commit murderous acts by promptly indentifying killers and handing over criminals to the family of the victim. But these punished crimes are only for personal/tribal killings, not politically motivated killings.
Journalist Hassan Kafi Hared was killed in January 2008 with Aid workers; no one was arrested or caught for this killing. Despite mourning, local journalists have doubts about elders power of identifying and persecuting killers of Nasteh Dahir Farah because of being targeted killing that relates to his journalistic work.
Funeral of Nasteh Dahir Farah
Hundreds of well-wishers of family members, journalists, intellectuals, clan elders, politicians, civil society members and religious leaders turned out to pay their last respect for the renowned journalist. They took his body on Sunday morning from his home to the graveyard. All speakers at funeral ceremony called for punishment of the killers. They spoke about late journalists performance and his personal & professional neutrality of the armed political conflict, which he for all times based his news reports.
The media in Kismayo was shut down for the bereavement of Nasteh Dahir Farah. Family of Nasteh Dahir Farah Nasteh Dahir Farah, who was born on 18 October 1980 in Abudwak district, left wife and son. Nastehs wife Idil Abdi Ahmed is six months pregnant. His son Mohammed- Deq Nasteh Dahir Farah is 10-month old. Nastehs father died in Abudwak in February 2008. His mother Asili Farah Nur lives in Abudwak with Nastehs brothers and sisters of more than 15.
Professional Information
Nasteh Dahir Farah studied in Beled-Hawo district of Gedo region in Southwest Somalia. He was a career media professional having risen through the ranks from trainee reporter, to editor-in-chief, and to become the Vice President of the National Union of Somali Journalists. He was trained on the dynamics of newsgathering, processing and dissemination. He took courses on editing, essentials of journalism, human rights reporting, ethics of journalism, safety of journalists in hostile environment, press freedom monitoring and media regulations. He was at the forefront in a number of Media activities. He was equipped with hands-on skills. Before joining BBC Somali Service as their correspondent in Kismayo, he was the editor-in-chief of Jubba FM in Kismayo. He freelanced for several foreign news agencies. Before Jubba FM, he was stringer for several regional radio stations.
As one of the founding members of the union, Nasteh Dahir Farah held numerous posts in the union. In 2004, he was elected to be the head of Southeast Branch of the union. He was in charge of the affairs of over 60 journalists in Lower and Upper Jubba regions. He was founding person of Jubba Independent Journalists Association (JIJA), a region association based in Kismayu. In 2005, Nasteh Dahir Farah was elected as Vice President of the National Union of Somali Journalists at its General Assembly in Mogadishu. He was devoted to ensure safety and press freedom of member journalists of the union while ensuring that journalists follow ethical rules of journalism which steer their service delivery. As he was in the national leadership of the union, he was actively involved in efforts of improving terms and working conditions of journalists.
He was one of 25 journalists who were trained as press freedom protectors. He assisted various investigations of attacks against media freedom. Nasteh Dahir Farah led numerous media activities by arranging competence and professional enhancement based training for media professionals. He was always dedicated to develop relations between media employees and media owners, especially in Kismayo, Baidoa and Mogadishu. He was actively involved in formulating the unions foreign partnership programs. He campaigned for assistance to families of killed journalists and the last case he worked on was assistance provided to the widow and children of murdered journalist Hassan Kafi Hared. Additionally, in the years that he was in top leadership of the national union, he helped the union in strategic planning, administration, membership management, networking and programs interfacing within larger media community.
*22.05.2008. L’ONU condamne l’absence de procès juste et équitable dans le dossier du journaliste Serge Maheshe, tué en juin 2007 en RDC
La Haut Commissaire des Nations Unies aux droits de l’homme, Mme Louise Arbour et M. Alan Doss, Représentant Spécial du Secrétaire Général de l'ONU en République démocratique du Congo (RDC), ont dénoncé aujourd’hui la condamnation à mort de trois civils et les nombreuses irrégularités qui ont entaché le procès, par la Cour militaire du Sud-Kivu, des assassins présumés du journaliste de la radio de la Mission des Nations Unies, Serge Maheshe.
Deux des civils avaient déjà été condamnés à mort en première instance alors que le troisième avait été acquitté en l’absence de preuve. La Haut Commissaire s’est félicitée de l’acquittement de deux autres civils, témoins oculaires du crime et amis de la victime, également condamnés à mort en première instance, bien que leur responsabilité n’ait pas été établie. La Haut Commissaire déplore les graves irrégularités relevées au cours du procès, telles que le refus de la Cour militaire d’explorer d’autres pistes crédibles de l’assassinat et de solliciter une expertise balistique de l’arme du crime, ainsi que des violations graves des droits de la défense et du principe d’égalité des moyens. De plus, la Haut Commissaire est particulièrement préoccupée par les intimidations et menaces répétées à l’encontre des accusés, avocats de la défense et observateurs indépendants au cours du procès.
« Je condamne la pratique des juridictions militaires qui continuent à poursuivre et juger des civils en violation des normes internationales en la matière et de la Constitution Congolaise » a déclaré Mme Arbour. « Le manque de volonté manifeste des autorités judiciaires militaires d’établir la vérité sur cet assassinat et les violations des normes internationales en matière de procès équitable sont également déplorables » , a ajouté la Haut Commissaire.
Journaliste pour la radio onusienne en RDC, Radio Okapi, Serge Maheshe a été tué le 13 juin 2007 à Bukavu. En août 2007, quatre civils avaient été condamnés à mort par le Tribunal militaire de Bukavu, sur la base des aveux des deux présumés auteurs matériels, qui se sont rétractés par la suite en accusant des magistrats militaires d'avoir exercé des pressions à leur égard pour obtenir ces aveux. Aucune enquête indépendante et impartiale n'a été menée sur ces accusations. La Cour d'Appel les a écartées sans avoir permis aux avocats de la défense et aux prévenus de réagir, ni d'interroger les magistrats incriminés.
Réagissant au verdict, le Représentant Spécial du Secrétaire Général des Nations unies et Chef de la MONUC, Alan Doss, a également condamné le procès et réitéré l’attachement de la Mission onusienne à la recherche de toute la vérité. « La MONUC constate qu'il reste beaucoup de questions à résoudre sur l'assassinat de Serge Maheshe et demande à la justice congolaise de faire toute la lumière sur ce crime, au regard des lois du pays et des normes internationales communément admises dans l’exercice de la justice » a déclaré M. Doss.
**13.05.08. LEBANON: PRESS FREEDOM A CASUALTY IN LATEST CONFLICT (IFEX/PEC)
At least five journalists have been injured in Beirut in recent days covering the fierce clashes between pro- and anti-government factions, while media outlets have been forced to shut down, report IFEX member in Lebanon the Maharat Foundation and other press freedom organisations.
According to the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), four reporters and photographers for the daily opposition newspaper "Sada al Balad" were injured in attacks while covering the conflict last week.
One of the photographers, Wadi Shlink, was in the Beshara al-Khoury area taking "regular" pictures of young men setting tires on fire on 7 May. "Suddenly, 20 of them attacked me. I ran looking for the security forces to protect me. Some soldiers tried to save me - in vain, because they were outnumbered by the rioters. They didn't calm down until they had taken my camera," Shlink told free expression website Menassat.com.
According to Menassat, the army ignored street fighting in the Beirut area of Corniche Mazraa, a traditional flashpoint between Sunni and Shiite forces, and instead went after journalists, forbidding them from taking pictures. Said Beyrouti, a reporter for Hezbollah's Al-Manar television, was kept from covering the fighting by the armed forces and beaten over the head and had to be hospitalised, Menassat reports.
Other journalists have been detained by police, had their equipment broken or their homes ransacked. On 12 May, two cameramen working for Al Jazeera were slightly injured when gunmen fired on their vehicle, reports ARTICLE 19.
Meanwhile, Hezbollah supporters forced the closure of pro-government satellite TV channels Future TV and Future News, the daily newspaper "Al-Mustaqbal" and Radio Orient on 9 May, says Reporters Without Borders (RSF). The four media companies are all owned by the family of Saad Hariri, the head of the Future movement, the anti-Syrian majority party in the Lebanese parliament.
Rockets were fired early on 9 May at the headquarters of "Al-Mustaqbal", starting a fire on one of its floors, reports RSF. Soon afterwards, gunmen surrounded the offices of the radio and television stations, and threatened to open fire if they did not stop broadcasting.
Future employees and other journalists have been holding a daily sit-in in front of the Future News building in Qantari to protest the closure.
The daily newspaper "Liwaa" also hasn't been able to publish - its printing house is located in the midst of the conflict zone, says Maharat. And on 10 May, the headquarters of the Armenian-speaking Radio Sevan was burned down in west Beirut, reports ARTICLE 19.
IFJ is supporting calls from the unions and Maharat to ensure journalists' safety, independence and their right to work. "We are calling on all political parties to end their attacks on media workers," says IFJ. "All journalists in Lebanon, including those working from starkly different perspectives, are unarmed non-combatants and must be treated accordingly. It is intolerable that journalists become vulnerable targets in this conflict simply for doing their jobs."
Maharat and others say the real problem is the politicisation of the Lebanese media, which has become the mouthpiece of the political group with which they are affiliated. The threats faced by reporters now are not a result of working in a war zone, but because of the "division of the Lebanese media between pro-government, opposition and independent media" that reflect the political struggle, says Maharat. It is calling on the media to "remain objective and not to enter the circle of violence."
ARTICLE 19 welcomes the re-launch of the Future Media network on May 13th, five days after its forced closure resulting from attacks from Hezbollah gunmen and other forces opposing the Lebanese government.
Future TV, Future News, Radio Orient and Al-Mustakbal newspaper have officially re-launched today from a different venue due to the damage caused at its headquarters and out of the fear of another attack.
**05.05.08. Freedom House: Press Freedom Losses Outnumber Gains Two to One in 2007
Washington / Global press freedom underwent a clear decline in 2007, with journalists struggling to work in increasingly hostile environments in almost every region in the world, according to a new survey released by Freedom House. The decline in press freedom -which occurred in authoritarian countries and established democracies alike - continues a six-year negative trend.
While the survey indicated that setbacks in press freedom outnumbered advances two to one globally, there was some improvement in the region with the least amount of press freedom: the Middle East and North Africa. The survey attributes the gains in the Middle East and North Africa to a growing number of journalists who were willing to challenge government restraints, a pushback trend seen in other regions as well.
"For every step forward in press freedom last year, there were two steps back," said Freedom House Executive Director Jennifer Windsor. "When press freedom is in retreat, it is an ominous sign that restrictions on other freedoms may soon follow. However, journalists in many countries of the world are pushing the boundaries, crossing the red-lines, demonstrating commitment and courage against great odds and we are seeing a greater global flow of information than ever before."
Out of 195 countries and territories, 72 (37 percent) were rated Free, 59 (30 percent) Partly Free, and 64 (33 percent) were Not Free, a decline from 2006. However, the study found that declines in individual countries and territories were often larger than in years past.
Key regional findings include:
- Central and Eastern Europe/ Former Soviet Union: This region showed the largest region-wide setback, with Russia, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan, and several Central European countries, among others, showing declines. Only 18 percent of the region's citizens live in environments with Free media.
- Middle East and North Africa: More unrestricted access to new media such as satellite television and the internet boosted press freedom regionally. Egyptian journalists showed an increased willingness to cross press freedom 'red lines,' moving the country into the Partly Free category.
- Asia-Pacific: Restrictions on media coverage were imposed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, and Vietnam's government cracked down on dissident writers.
- Americas: Guyana's status shifted from Free to Partly Free, while Mexico's score deteriorated by a further three points because of increased violence against journalists and impunity surrounding attacks on media.
- Sub-Saharan Africa: The region accounted for three of the year's five status changes: Benin declined from Free to Partly Free, while the Central African Republic and Niger moved into the Not Free category. Political conflict and misuse of libel laws were key factors behind a number of country declines.
- Western Europe: The region continued to have the highest level of press freedom worldwide, despite declines in Portugal, Malta and Turkey, the only country in the region ranked Partly Free.
The survey, released annually in advance of World Press Freedom Day on May 3, assesses the degree of print, broadcast, and internet freedom in every country in the world. The 2008 ratings are based on an assessment of the legal, political and economic environments in which journalists worked in 2007.
"Improvements in a small number of countries were far overshadowed by a continued, relentless assault on independent news media," said Karin Deutsch Karlekar, Freedom House senior researcher and managing editor of the survey.
"We are particularly concerned that while abuses of press freedom continue unabated in restrictive environments such as China, threats are also apparent in countries with an established record of media freedom and in newer democracies in Central Europe and Africa."
The key trends that led to numerical movements in the study include:
- Unrest and Upheaval: Media played a key role in covering coups, states of emergency and contested elections in countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Georgia, and as a result, journalists became prime targets during government crackdowns.
- Violence and Impunity: Violence against journalists and, in many cases, corresponding impunity regarding past cases of abuse was a key factor in determining press freedom in countries as diverse as Mexico, Russia and the Philippines.
- Punitive laws: Media freedom remains seriously constrained by the presence and use of numerous laws that are used to punish critical journalists and outlets. The abuse of libel laws increased in a number of countries, most notably in Africa.
- New media: Satellite television and internet-based news and networking sources are an emerging force for openness in restricted media environments as well as a key target for government control.
The world's worst-rated countries continue to include Burma, Cuba, Libya, North Korea, and Turkmenistan. In 2007, Eritrea joined the ranks of these exceedingly bad performers, while a crackdown in Burma worsened that country's already repressive media environment, leaving its score second only to that of North Korea worldwide.
Detailed country information, methodology and graphics from the survey are available online at http://freedomhouse.org
***03.05.08 World Press Freedom Day - Free press, access to information vital for development, top UN officials stress
Marking the annual World Press Freedom Day, top United Nations officials have stressed the role of a secure and independent media, and access to information, in empowering individuals and advancing development.
“When information flows freely, people are equipped with tools to take control of their lives,” noted Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in his message for the Day, observed each year on 3 May. “When the flow of information is hindered – whether for political or technological reasons – our capacity to function is stunted.”
Mr. Ban stressed that a free, secure and independent media is one of the foundations of peace and democracy. Attacks on freedom of the press are attacks against international law, humanity, and freedom itself – everything the UN stands for, he said.
Alarmed at the increasing targeting of journalists around the world, and the failure to thoroughly investigate and prosecute such crimes, the Secretary-General called on all societies to spare no effort in bringing to justice the perpetrators of such attacks. He also paid tribute to all who work in difficult and dangerous conditions to provide the world with free, unbiased information.
The theme for this year's World Press Freedom Day, which was established by the UN in 1993, is “access to information and the empowerment of people.”
In his message on the occasion of the Day, the head of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) – the body tasked with protecting freedom of expression – stressed that press freedom and access to information feed into the wider development objective of empowering people by giving people the information that can help them gain control over their own lives.
“This empowerment supports participatory democracy by giving citizens the capacity to engage in public debate and to hold governments and others accountable,” said UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura.
Access to information is primordial to the exercise of the basic human right of freedom of expression, Mr. Matsuura added. To be free, the media need to have access to information. Such access is also indispensable in fighting corruption, which has been defined as the primary obstacle to development.
The winner of this year's UNESCO World Press Freedom Prize is a Mexican reporter who has been a target of death threats, sabotage and police harassment because of her work uncovering prostitution and child pornography networks.
Freelance investigative journalist Lydia Cacho Ribeiro will receive the award today at a World Press Freedom Day ceremony in Maputo, Mozambique, organized by UNESCO.
General Assembly President Srgjan Kerim stressed the importance of press freedom, noting that “it is access to information that truly empowers the individual to become more active and more responsible. In this free press is a crucial ally.”
He said the media contributes to the process of democratization, to the strengthening of the rule of law and ultimately to institution building by asking the “right and often difficult” questions, providing access to information and representing all views impartially.
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights marked the Day by noting that harassment and secrecy laws are weakening press freedom. “It is a sad fact that many governments across the world persist in undermining the freedom of the press to report facts and opinions and, by extension, the right of people in general to be informed about events and policies that are shaping our world,” Louise Arbour said.
Ms. Arbour noted that governments are becoming more secretive and offering propaganda disguised as objective information – especially when alleged security-related issues are on the table.
The proliferation of new or strengthened secrecy laws means that the media are forced to resort to speculation, which can then be used against them to further undermine their credibility, or even as a justification for initiating legal proceedings against them, she added.
On World Press Freedom Day, UN independent expert calls for end to censorship
The following statement was released by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Mr. Ambeyi Ligabo, on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day.
“World Press Freedom Day is an occasion to celebrate the virtues of a free press, a fundamental human right enshrined in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The benefits of a free and independent press should be self-evident to everyone. However, this basic right unfortunately continues to be denied to the millions of people around the world living under oppressive regimes who stifle any sign of dissent.
Censorship of the media constitutes the most abominable violation to freedom of the press – and yet it is also the most frequent of all restrictions. In most cases, censorship is but a pretext to silence criticism, protecting those in power from popular scrutiny and public accountability, serving to conceal corruption, mismanagement and abuse of authority. Censorship contributes to the creation of a protective aura around those who due to the nature of their functions need to be held permanently accountable for their actions, placing them beyond public criticism.
States have recently relied on a large array of measures that, albeit in different degrees, promote direct or indirect censorship. The more traditional restrictions, such as the outright banning and suspension of media outlets, confiscation of newspapers and magazines from newsstands and overt editorial interference by censors, are still widespread. The prevalence of these measures is illustrated by recent events in Sudan, where the circulation of five independent newspapers – Al-Sudani , al-Ahdath , Ajras al-Huriya , al-Rai al-Shaab and The Citizen – was banned due to their publication of critical articles. In Tonga, the Government recently appointed an editorial committee whose responsibility is to review and edit campaign speeches by candidates, removing any reference to the pro-democracy protests in November 2006.
The new media, particularly the Internet, have not remained free of censorship or direct repression. Due to its low cost, decentralized nature and large audience, the Internet has become one of the most important means for the circulation of independent ideas. As a result, it is a key target of attempts to monitor, control and censor the digital media, particularly bloggers, Internet contributors and cyber-dissidents. In some cases, Governments have blocked virtually all access to the Internet by its own citizens, such as during the peaceful protests in Myanmar in September 2007, thus thwarting all communication with the outside world. In other cases, Internet access has been allowed but independent websites, and even “politically sensitive terms” within search engines, remain censored. This has been possible to a large extent due to the complicity of leading Internet corporations – the majority of which are based in democratic countries – that have accepted these limitations. Worryingly, some Internet companies have even disclosed personal information of their users in order to allow Governments to identify and convict internet writers.
These explicit censorship measures now exist alongside more subtle tactics that severely restrict the independence of the press whilst seemingly allowing States to maintain a façade of respect to democratic principles such as freedom of expression. In this regard, Governments have exerted severe economic pressure, including through selective use of State advertisement, aiming to strangle independent media outlets. They have also exploited subjective regulations such as licensing to suspend or shut down the broadcast or printed media. Libel lawsuits have similarly been used deliberately as a means to imprison critical journalists or to punish them with disproportionate fines. Examples of these measures abound. In Guyana, for instance, CNS Channel 6 was suspended for four months for “infringing the terms of its license” after an interviewee, speaking during a live broadcast, called for attacks against the President.
The impact of these measures is not restricted to the media outlets or journalists they target. Rather, they serve to create an unsafe and unstable environment for the functioning of the press as a whole, leading them to shun critical reporting and impose self-censorship.
International legal instruments protect the right of every citizen to receive information and ideas of all kinds, through any media of his or her choice. Governments have thus a legally binding commitment to end censorship, protect a free and independent media and guarantee their right to criticize. Freedom of the press cannot be applicable exclusively for those with whom we agree. On the contrary, the key to freedom of expression is to respect the rights of those with whom we disagree to voice their own opinion. Without this right, democracy itself cannot flourish. I therefore call on all states to dismantle policies that contribute directly or indirectly to censorship, eliminating a practice of which the sole goal is to silence dissent, opposition and criticism.
**17.04.08.Palestinian Centre for Development & Media Freedoms (Mada) condemns the murder of journalist Fadel Subhi Shana'a, demands punishment for those responsible
The Palestinian Centre for Development and Media Freedoms (Mada) strongly condemns the heinous crime committed by the Israeli occupation forces at about 5:30 this afternoon (16 April), which led to the killing of Reuters cameraman Fadel Subhi Shana'a (24 years old.) His assistant Wafa Abu Mezyed was also injured in his left hand and his right leg . Shana'a and Abu Mezyed were covering the Israeli aggression in the Juhr Al-Deek area north of the Bureij refugee camp in the Gaza Strip. Abu Mezyed said that an Israeli tank, that was 1500 m away from them, fired a bomb at their car, which was carrying a clear press sign, resulting in the killing of Shana'a immediately and the shell shrapnel injury of the assistant. Abu Mezyed confirmed that there were only children in the area of the bomb, and there was no provocation for the attack. Mada strongly denounces this unprovoked murder of a journalist, and demands punishment for those responsible for this ugly crime. Further, Mada calls on the international community to pressure the Government of Israel to halt its attacks on journalists, and to stop the ongoing aggression against the Palestinian people, especially in the Gaza Strip.
***16.04.2008. MEXICO. The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) supports this statement addressed to the highest authorities in Mexico:
C. Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, President of Mexico C. Juan Camilo Mouriño Terrazo, Minister of the Interior C. Eduardo Medina Mora Icaza, Attorney General C. Ulises Ruiz Ortiz, Governor of Oaxaca C. Octavio Alberto Orellana Wiarco, Special Prosecutor for Crimes Against Journalists C. Evencio Martínez Ramírez, Attorney General of Oaxaca C. José Luis Soberanes Fernández, President of the National Human Rights Commission
In a statement addressed to the highest authorities in Mexico, including the President of the Republic, the Mexican branch of the World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters, ARTICLE 19 and Reporters without Borders condemn the murder of two community journalists and demand: Investigation into the events of 8 April 2008 on the San Juan Copala road, Oaxaca, which resulted in the murder of Teresa Bautista Merino and Felicitas Martínez Sánchez, community journalists working for the radio station La Voz que Rompe el Silencio (Voice that Breaks the Silence).That the intellectual and material authors of the crime that took the life of these journalists be brought to justiceGuarantees for the life and physical integrity of the survivors, Faustino Vázquez Martínez, Cristina Martínez Flores and their two young children, who are key witnesses to the events, and the life and physical integrity of other members of this community radio station.An end to the climate of impunity that allows attacks against community media personnel, journalists and the media in general and their disappearance and murder to continue, which makes Mexico the most dangerous country on the continent to be a journalist. Background: The creation of the autonomous municipality of San Juan Copala in January 2007 saw the return of the municipality that was abolished by decree by the Oaxaca State Legislature in 1948. However, it also signalled the exacerbation of conflict between opposing groups in the region.
As part of the autonomous municipality's programme, the community radio station, Radio Triqui, La Voz que Rompe el Silencio, was created. The murdered journalists played an important role in the community and denounced human rights violations, abuses of power and especially the increase in the number of attacks and rapes of the community's women by local political bosses.
In recent years, the Triqui region has suffered a climate of generalised violence because of a lack of mechanisms for dialogue and development in the region. The impunity of the crimes committed in recent years has aggravated the alarming increase in human rights violations.
This is not the first attack on indigenous community radio stations in Oaxaca. In 2006, Radio Nnandia, a licensed radio station in Mazatlán Villa de Flores, was violently evicted from its offices and members of Radio Calenda in San Antonino de Castillo Velasco were shot at and severely beaten up. Oaxaca?s indigenous and community radios have distinguished themselves in recent years with information services to their communities, which has broken the domination of traditional media.
The facts: The community journalists, Teresa Bautista Merino and Felicitas Martínez Sánchez were travelling back to their community with Faustino Vázquez Martínez, Cristina Martínez Flores and two children after attending a meeting with people in the community of Llano Juárez about the latter's participation in the radio station.
They were ambushed by persons attempting to abduct them. They were hit by several bullets and lost control of the vehicle. The journalists Teresa Bautista and Felicitas Martínez lost their lives in the attack, while the couple, Faustino and Cristina (and their two children) suffered bullet wounds.
Twenty 7.62 calibre bullet cartridge cases were found in the area, the type used by AK-47 assault rifles, weapons restricted to army use.
We therefore DEMAND: I. That the Attorney General and the Special Prosecutor for Crimes Against Journalists (FEADP): Undertake an investigation into the killings and the attack, on the grounds that attacks against journalists are under their jurisdiction and because of the calibre of the weapon used to kill Teresa Bautista Merino and Felícitas Martínez Sánchez, journalists at the community radio La Voz que Rompe el Silencio. Take the necessary measures to protect the lives and physical integrity of Cristina Martínez Flores and Faustino Vásquez Martínez and their young children, aged three and two years, witnesses to the events, and all other members of the radio. Investigate in a serious, expeditious and effective manner, bring to justice those responsible, including the material and intellectual authors, and order reparations for the harm caused. II. That the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH): Monitors the events and calls for measures to protect the life of Cristina Martínez Flores and Faustino Vásquez Martínez and their young children, aged three and two years, witnesses to the events, and all other members of the radio. III. That the Federal and State Executives: Guarantee justice, respect for human rights and freedom of expression, punish those responsible, create mechanisms necessary to promote dialogue and put an end to the generalised climate of violence in Oaxaca. IV. That the Federal Legislative Power: Takes the necessary legislative measures for community radios to be able to carry out their work in an atmosphere of legality, security and freedom. We remind the Mexican Government that: The murder, kidnapping, intimidation of and/or threats to social communicators, as well as the material destruction of communications media violate the fundamental rights of individuals and strongly restrict freedom of expression. It is the duty of the state to prevent and investigate such occurrences, to punish their perpetrators and to ensure that victims receive due compensation. The Rule of Law in Mexico is under serious threat when freedom of expression, a fundamental human right that is a cornerstone of democracy, is continuously violated: Freedom of expression in all its forms and manifestations is a fundamental and inalienable right of all individuals. Additionally, it is an indispensable requirement for the very existence of a democratic society.
***10.04.08. TIBET-CHINA. PEC welcomes a statement by seven UN experts.UN human rights experts call for restraint and transparency as mass arrests are reported in the Tibetan Autonomous Region and surrounding areas in China
United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders have today issued a joint statement of concern regarding the ongoing protests and reports of high numbers of arrests in the Tibetan Autonomous Region and surrounding areas in China. They urge restraint and non-violence by all parties, greater and unfettered access to the regions concerned for journalists and independent observers, guarantees for the free flow of information, and full implementation of international standards in regard to the treatment of protestors and those detained, both in the People’s Republic of China and in other countries in which protests are taking place.
The mandate holders urge the Government of China to fully conform to its commitment to freedom of expression and assembly, and to distinguish between peaceful protestors and those committing acts of violence. The mandate holders call for complete compliance with due process and fair trial rights according to international standards for those detained or charged with a crime, including provision of each person's name, the charges against them, and the name of the facility where they are detained or imprisoned, as well as ensuring access to legal defence. The Government is called upon to lift restrictions imposed on the media, including Internet websites, that limit access throughout China to information concerning the Tibetan Autonomous Region.
Information received by the mandate holders describes the arrest on 28 and 29 March of over 570 Tibetan monks, including some children, following raids by security forces on monasteries in Ngaba County and in Dzoge County in the Tibetan Autonomous Region. According to reports, arrests were made of those suspected of participating in protests and those suspected of communicating with the exiled Tibetan communities. The UN experts are deeply concerned by reports of security forces firing on protestors and alleged killings. Amid concerns that independent observers and foreign media have been restricted from accessing regions in which protests have taken place, the United Nations experts call for full access for independent observers and journalists to such regions and complete transparency on the part of the authorities.
The Government of China has invited several fact-finding delegations, including one consisting of journalists and another of foreign diplomats, to visit the Tibetan Autonomous Region. Such visits are no substitute for granting access to those United Nations experts who have requested a visit to China. While welcoming the Government of China's previous invitations to United Nations mandate holders, it is nevertheless urged to respond equally positively to outstanding visit requests to enable mandate holders including the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions to carry out the responsibilities entrusted to them by the Human Rights Council.
The mandate holders urge that protests are conducted in a peaceful, non-violent manner, and that authorities in all countries in which protests take place exercise restraint in their responses. They fully support calls for dialogue and other measures with a view to achieving long-term solutions that protect and promote the rights of all individuals and groups in the Tibetan Autonomous Region.
A draft of this statement was shared with the relevant Government. The mandate holders welcome the indication received from the Government about its willingness to engage in further dialogue about these and other concerns and specific questions raised recently by the mandates. They look forward to receiving further information and clarifications from the Government and to engage constructively in efforts to facilitate full respect for human rights standards, by all parties concerned, in the handling of such protests.
This statement is issued by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Mr Philip Alston; the Special Rapporteur for the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Mr Ambeyi Ligabo; the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Ms Asma Jahangir; the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders, Ms Hina Jilani; the Independent Expert on minority issues, Ms Gay McDougall; and the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture, Mr Manfred Nowak.
***08.04.08. IRAQ FIVE YEARS AFTER - IFJ Calls on Iraq and United States to End “Shameful Silence” over Killed Journalists - five years after the fall of Baghdad and the attack on the Palestine Hotel(Read also PEC statement on PEC NEWS and below CPJ statement)
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on the Governments of Iraq and the United States to issue reports and investigations into the widespread targeting and killing of reporters and media staff during the Iraq war. The IFJ says 273 media lives have been lost since the fall of Baghdad to American troops five years ago this week.
In January the Iraqi government promised a high-ranking IFJ delegation that it would publish a report on the killing of journalists “within days” – but it has still not done so. And the IFJ is still insisting that the killing of three journalists by United States troops in Baghdad on April 8, 2003, and a number of other unexplained media deaths at the hands of the American army must be properly investigated.
“A few weeks ago the leader of Iraqi journalists was himself gunned down by unknown killers,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “The shameful silence of the authorities over all of these deaths gives an impression of callous indifference and toleration of impunity.”
The IFJ says that justice for all the media victims of the war can only be served by full, inclusive and searching inquiries to find the killers and bring them to justice. Today marks the fifth anniversary of the attack by US troops on the Palestine Hotel, which housed scores of media personnel, killing Taras Protsyuk of Reuters and Jose Cuoso, of the Telecinco network in Spain. On the same morning, journalist Tareq Ayyoub was killed when the Baghdad offices of the Arab satellite channel Al Jazeera were attacked by US fighter planes. The deaths have still not been properly explained.
The IFJ and its member unions are insisting that Iraqi authorities take seriously the concerted attack on journalists by terrorists and other extremists. They were promised a report only a few weeks before the shooting, on February 23, of Shihab Al-Timimi, the President of the Iraqi Union of Journalists, in Baghdad. Al-Timimi, 75, died four days later from bullet wounds sustained in the attack outside the union’s offices.
“The agreement between the President and leading political parties in Iraq to support the government in its fight against militias, and a call on all political factions to dismantle its militia is welcome,” said White. “But if the Iraqi government wants the support of journalists community it must make good on its promise to publish a report and expose those who are killing journalists.”
In December 2006, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1738, a measure championed by the IFJ and its member unions that protects journalists in conflict zones and says killing them can be considered a war crime.
The IFJ has also demanded action over the deaths of British ITN reporter Terry Lloyd and his colleagues Fred Nérac and Hussein Osman, whose bodies are still missing, in a fire fight between US and Iraqi troops near Basra, in March 2003 as the invasion of Iraq gathered pace and has raised questions over the shooting by US soldiers of Reuters cameramen Mazen Dana. In October 2006 a British coroner ruled that the death of ITN reporter Terry Lloyd in the Basra fire-fight was an “unlawful killing.”
“The shadow of impunity continues to fall over Iraq where journalists have been prominent among the victims,” said White. “It’s time for the Iraqi and American authorities to take their responsibility for ending the uncertainty and ignorance about what has happened to our colleagues.”
***07.04.08. IRAQ Five years after deadly Palestine Hotel and Al-Jazeera strikes, unanswered questions linger
Five years after a series of U.S. military strikes against media outlets in Baghdad killed three journalists, CPJ calls on the U.S. military to fully investigate the incidents and make its findings public. CPJ also calls on the U.S. military to implement procedures to address the presence of journalists on the battlefield.
On April 8, 2003, a U.S. tank fired a single shell on the Palestine Hotel, the main base for dozens of international journalists covering the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, killing Spanish cameraman José Couso of Telecinco and veteran Reuters cameraman Taras Protsyuk, and wounding three other reporters. A CPJ investigation into the attack, “Permission to Fire,” found that although the attack on the hotel was not deliberate, it could have been avoided and may have been caused by a breakdown in communication within the U.S. Army chain of command.
Earlier that morning, U.S. air strikes hit the Baghdad bureau of the Qatar-based Al-Jazeera satellite news channel, killing correspondent Tareq Ayyoub and injuring a station cameraman. Moments later, the nearby offices of Abu Dhabi TV came under fire in a separate attack. While both stations were operating in a combat area, they had been there for weeks and Al-Jazeera had provided its coordinates to the Pentagon.
It was not the first time the U.S. military had struck Al-Jazeera; the channel’s Kabul bureau was hit in November 2001.The Pentagon has stated that the Kabul bureau was “a known al-Qaeda facility” without offering any evidence.
David Schlesinger, editor-in-chief of Reuters, spoke to CPJ about his dissatisfaction with the progress since one of his reporters was killed. “While there have been official investigations into various incidents, we are not satisfied with their speed or objectivity,” Schlesinger said. “We feel acutely that more needs to be done to make the battlefield as safe as possible for non-combatants like journalists.”
“Troubling questions about these attacks linger to this day, and each has potentially deadly implications for all journalists who work in conflict zones,” said CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon. “U.S. officials need to answer the longstanding questions of why U.S. troops on the ground were not made aware of the Palestine Hotel, and what steps the military has taken to avoid such tragedies in the future. It must also end its silence about its strike on Al-Jazeera.”
On August 12, 2003, U.S. Central Command (Centcom) issued a news release summarizing the results of its investigation into the shelling of the Palestine Hotel. The report concluded that the tank unit that opened fire on the hotel did so “in a proportionate and justifiably measured response.” It called the shelling “fully in accordance with the Rules of Engagement.” However, the news release failed to address one of the conclusions in CPJ’s report: that U.S. commanders knew journalists were in the Palestine Hotel but failed to convey this knowledge to forces on the ground.
The military’s investigation, released in November 2004, found no fault in the attack and did not explain why troops were not made aware of what was one of Baghdad’s best known civilian locations. To CPJ’s knowledge, the U.S. military has never investigated or credibly explained its strike on Al-Jazeera’s bureau. Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman did not respond to CPJ’s request for comment for this report.
In Spain, Couso’s family is pursuing criminal charges against three U.S. soldiers involved in the attack on the Palestine Hotel—Sgt. Shawn Gibson, Capt. Philip Wolford, and Lt. Col. Philip DeCamp.
U.S. military officials have in the past discussed ways to improve safety with news executives and press freedom groups. Military officials have formulated a set of recommendations as part of their investigative report into the death of Reuters cameraman Mazen Dana, who was shot and killed by U.S. soldiers in August 2003 while filming outside Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. These included calls to improve military communication regarding the presence of journalists in conflict areas, improve communications between the military and the media, and reassess the rules of engagement for U.S. troops.
“Why were U.S. troops on the ground not made aware of who was in the Palestine Hotel, one of the best known civilian sites in all of Baghdad?” Simon asked. “More important, what steps has the military taken to avoid such tragedies in the future? Why has the U.S. remained silent despite repeated demands to explain its strikes on Al-Jazeera and Abu Dhabi TV? Five years on, these questions are still urgent and they demand answers.”
***28.03.2008. Special Study on Murder of Journalists in South America. Special rapporteur for freedom of expression urges OAS member States to give highest priority to resolving state of impunity in murders of journalists
Washington, D.C., March 27, 2008— Between 1995 and 2005, 157 journalists were killed in 19 countries of the Americas for motives possibly connected to their jobs. As of the end of 2007, only 32 of these cases had produced some type of conviction, according to the Special Study on the Status of Investigations into the Murder of Journalists in the 1995-2000 Period for Reasons that May Be Related to their Work in Journalism. The study was published today by the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the OAS Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).
The largest number of murders took place in Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico, according to the investigation undertaken for this study. In Colombia, 75 reporters were killed, and only 7 of those cases have led to some type of conviction. In Brazil, where 23 members of the media have been killed, convictions have been handed down in only 9 cases. Of the 20 murders of reporters in Mexico, only in 4 cases have there been convictions. None of the 9 cases in Guatemala has led to a conviction, while in Haiti, convictions have been handed down in only 2 of the 6 cases.
In the study, which was approved in March 2008 by the OAS Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Office of the Special Rapporteur emphasizes in general that investigations into these murders have proceeded at an excessively slow pace. Most of the investigations show serious deficiencies in the way they are conducted, face obstacles, and have not led to a clarification of the facts or to convictions. According to the study, of the 32 cases in which there has been some type of conviction, the sentence has not always been put into effect, nor have all those responsible for planning and carrying out the crime necessarily been punished.
In light of the situation described in the study on the murder of journalists, the Office of the Special Rapporteur strongly urges the member countries of the Organization of American States (OAS) to give the highest political priority to addressing and resolving the state of impunity surrounding the murder of journalists. It asks for impartial, serious, and diligent investigations that lead to a clarification of the facts, the identification of all perpetrators—those who physically commit the crime and the masterminds—as well as their arrest, trial, and effective punishment. The Office of the Rapporteur also suggests that the agencies in charge of investigating murders of members of the media be strengthened, that any obstacles that impede the normal development of the investigations be removed, and that the security of witnesses, victims’ family members, prosecutors, judges, and attorneys be guaranteed. The Office of the Rapporteur also urges the States to adopt measures to protect reporters who receive threats in order to prevent attempts against their lives.
"The presence of more subtle forms of restricting freedom of expression that we see in the region—such as criminal cases brought against journalists, the placement of official advertising as reward or punishment for a media outlet’s editorial stance, official pressure applied to the media, the decision to arbitrarily grant or revoke broadcast licenses, discrimination in access to official sources, and the effect on pluralism of monopolies or increasing consolidation in media ownership, either on the part of the State, individuals, or corporations—should not lead us to lose sight of the fact that in the Americas, journalists continue to be killed, and the vast majority of these murders go unpunished," the Special Rapporteur Ignacio J. Alvarez stated.
"That concern led to the idea of conducting a study that could serve as a wake-up call to increase awareness about this extremely serious problem," he added. "We are aware than many of the murders could be tied to drug trafficking, other forms of organized crime, paramilitary forces, and dissident armed groups. However, it falls to the States to investigate and punish those cases through their courts and other competent entities. Impunity is the responsibility of the States."
The murder of journalists and members of the media is the most violent way to violate the right to freedom of expression. It not only nullifies the victim’s right to life; it also infringes on the right of the victim’s family to mental and moral wholeness, and deprives society of a source of opinion and information, the new study argues. It notes that the lack of adequate investigations, and the impunity that results when journalists are murdered for reasons related to their work, can create conditions that make it easier for other reporters to be killed and can foster self-censorship, which restricts freedom of expression. The study also underscores the States’ positive obligation to investigate these murders effectively, determine their causes, and punish those responsible. The failure to comply with this obligation, and the resulting impunity, generate an international responsibility on the part of the States, both in the case of crimes committed by agents of the State and those committed by private individuals, according to the study.
The criterion used to register the murders included in this study was based on crimes "committed for motives that could be related to journalistic activity." The Office of the Rapporteur prepared a preliminary table that included the name of the reporter or member of the media killed; the date and country in which the events took place; and a brief description of the events, based on the Office of the Special Rapporteur’s annual reports, its daily monitoring of the state of freedom of expression in the region, its quarterly communiqués, the information it receives from the States, and public information available provided by international and national nongovernmental organizations. This preliminary table was sent in 2006 to the States, nongovernmental organizations, and other institutions, with a request for information about the status of investigations into these crimes, based on a questionnaire. With the information gathered through this consultation, a draft final table was prepared and sent to the States again in January 2008 so they could make observations or provide updated information they considered pertinent. An analytical study was then made of the information that had been systematized in the final table.
The Office of the Special Rapporteur also notes that in 2006, 2007, and early 2008 new murders of journalists have taken place for reasons that may be related to their work in journalism, at what continues to be very high rate.
The entire study has been posted on the Office of the Rapporteur’s Web site: http://www.cidh.oas.org
***27.03.2008. TIBET - PEC Supports IFJ Call to China to Abide by Free Media Commitments
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has urged Chinese authorities to allow free media access to enter and report from Lhasa, Tibet following unrest that has plagued the region since March 14.
Chinese authorities have been selectively allowing foreign journalists to enter Lhasa from March 26 only by arrangement with the provincial government.
The IFJ welcomes this slight increase in the freedom of movement of journalists following the Chinese Government’s orders to force journalists, including more than 15 Hong Kong journalists, to leave Tibet from March 17.
Despite this small positive step, the IFJ continues to condemn the unacceptable breach of both the ‘Service Guide for Foreign Media Coverage of the Beijing Olympic Games and the Prepatory Period’ and the ‘Measures for the Reporting Activities in the Mainland Conducted by the Journalists of Hong Kong and Macau during the Beijing Olympic Games and the Preparatory Period’, both issued by the Beijing Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (BOCOG) with the support of the Chinese government.
According to regulations on reporting in both Guides, journalists need only to obtain prior consent from interviewees to interview organisations or individuals in China. These regulations were to come into force from 1 January 2007 and will expire on 17 October 2008.
Furthermore, the Guide for journalists of Hong Kong and Macau states, “If security issues arise when foreign journalists are covering public on-the-spot news, they can ask for help from the security or aid officials.” This suggests the Chinese authorities should assist rather then hinder journalists’ work.
The Foreign Journalists’ Guide states, “Foreign journalists can carry out reporting activities not only on the Beijing Olympic Games and the prepatory period, but also on politics, economy, society and culture of China.”
By denying freedom of movement of journalists and restricting media freedoms, the Chinese Government appears to be departing from the regulations in the Guides and limiting access to information. The selection of particular journalists and the apparent screening of news by the authorities is unacceptable and does not promote free and fair coverage.
“This selective arrangement is not good enough to ease international suspicions that the Chinese government is clouding certain facts regarding the recent unrest in Tibet,” said IFJ Asia-Pacific Director Jacqueline Park.
“It would be in China’s interests, as the host of the 2008 Olympic Games, to promote press freedom and encourage transparency. The expulsion and screening of journalists appears to call into question China’s commitment to the free media regulations implemented in January 2007.” Read other reports on Tibet below
***27.03.2007. Stop the War on Journalists in Sri Lanka says World Press Freedom Community - The Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) joined IFJ call
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has today sent a joint letter to the President of Sri Lanka voicing the concerns from over 30 journalists’ associations and press freedom and human rights organisations across the globe for the safety of journalists from the island nation.
Addressed to Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa, President of the Socialist Democratic Republic of Sri Lanka, the letter demands an immediate change in the escalating culture of violence against journalists by government officials and members of the public.
This letter is the first of a series of actions for the ‘Stop the War on Journalists’ campaign for Sri Lanka which will culminate with world Press Freedom Day on May 3 and the release of the IFJ’s annual South Asia Press Freedom Report for 2007-2008.
A global day of action has been called for April 10, 2008. This day, which falls two days before Sri Lanka’s Sinhala and Tamil New Year celebrations, will send a message of hope and strength to the band of journalists’ organisations in Sri Lanka who have continued their fight for press freedom despite dangerous circumstances involving high risks to the personal safety of themselves and their families.
“Sri Lanka has long been considered one of the most dangerous countries in the world for journalists, but the situation is becoming ever more serious,” said IFJ Asia Pacific Director Jacqueline Park.
“Our colleagues in Sri Lanka need to know that the international press freedom and human rights communities stand in solidarity with them and support their tireless work.”
All journalists’ associations, media organisations and press freedom and human rights groups are invited to add their name to the joint letter as well as send their own letters to the Sri Lankan embassies in their countries on April 10 and display the campaign poster on their websites, at rallies and in the press at any opportunity.
***24.03.2008. TIBET - Human Rights Watch - Account for Missing and Dead; Reopen Lhasa to Media and Monitors.
The Olympic torch, which was lit today in Olympia, Greece, should not go through Tibet unless the Chinese government agrees to an independent investigation into the recent unrest in Tibetan areas, Human Rights Watch said today.
The Olympic torch is set to pass through the Tibetan capital, Lhasa, on June 20-21. Chinese government officials have confirmed their plans to continue despite the ongoing protests and crackdown across ethnic Tibetan areas.
Since March 10, unprecedented demonstrations have taken place in the Tibetan Autonomous Region, at least three Chinese provinces, and Beijing. Chinese security forces have responded by dispersing the protests, in some cases violently. The Chinese government claims that 18 civilians and one policeman were killed, and a total of 623 people injured during the protests in Lhasa on March 12. Tibetan exile groups have reported that at least 80 people died during the protests. The Chinese government has now admitted opening fire on demonstrators in Sichuan and shooting four people. Foreign journalists were expelled from these areas shortly after the demonstrations began, and lines of communication of have been cut or heavily restricted.
“Either Tibet is open or it’s not. If it is, let independent monitors and the media go there. If it’s not, the torch shouldn’t go there either,” said Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. “The Olympic torch should not be turned into a smokescreen to cover up human rights abuses.”
With a large but unknown number of Tibetans detained in Tibet and adjoining provinces in the aftermath of public protests, Human Rights Watch said Beijing Olympic officials’ resolve to run the Olympic torch through the region could exacerbate tensions, invite new protests, and provoke further repression.
Human Rights Watch has called for the Chinese government to: lift its lock-down of all Tibetan areas, including allowing full media access; account for the missing and dead from this month’s protests; publish the names of all individuals detained and their places of detention; and give immediate access to independent monitors who can investigate whether detainees are being tortured or mistreated. Human Rights Watch said governments, the International Olympic Committee and Olympic sponsors of the torch relay should press China to reopen the region and allow an independent investigation, ideally headed by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, into recent events in Tibet.
“The IOC and the sponsors of the torch relay – Coca-Cola, Samsung and Lenovo – should not associate themselves with a highly repressive situation where abuses are very likely, in violation both of the Olympic Charter and of the basic principles of corporate social responsibility,” said Richardson. “Acting responsibly is good publicity. Being morally blind is not.”
Other reports on Tibet below
**19.03.2008.TIBET: PEC Supports ICJ Call for International Investigation into Reported Human Rights Violations - protests sealing Tibet off from the world, asks for free access to information in Tibet - Read below ICJ, IFEX, IFJ statements - PEC statement on page PEC NEWS
The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) today called on the Government of the People's Republic of China to permit the Tibetan people to demonstrate peacefully and called for an international investigation into serious allegations that the Chinese security forces have carried out human rights violations during the recent protests in Lhasa and other locations. "The Tibetan people have a right to express in public and private their views about the situation in Tibet. Anyone arrested solely for peacefully protesting or expressing his or her views should be considered to have been arbirarily detained. The sustained clamp down over many years on political dissent in Tibet has only fueled the tension and helped lead to the recent explosion of anger and frustration. If the Chinese Government allowed the Tibetans an opportunity to express their views, including through public demonstrations, this could help to difuse a tense political situation," said the ICJ.
The ICJ expressed its concern about the fate of those that have been or may be arrested and urged the Government to treat all detainees according to internationally established standards, including by ensuring that they are not subject to torture or ill-treatment and that they have access to their families and others from the outside world. Anyone arrested on suspicion of committing violence, such as violence against Chinese civilians, should be charged with a recognisable criminal offence and tried fairly, or released.
The ICJ also called for a prompt and independent international investigation into allegations of human rights violations in the context of recent demonstrations. "The Government is seeking to seal Tibet off from the world, and there is considerable confusion about the truth surrounding recent events. It is essential that human rights experts be allowed to investigate the situation, including allegations that peaceful protestors have been killed and that other excessive force has been used by the security forces, and that protestors have been arbitrarily arrested and detained. It is in everyone's interest to swiftly clarify exactly what is happening in Tibet now" said the ICJ.
This investigation could include a role for existing human rights experts of the United Nations Human Rights Council, such as the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Expression.
The ICJ has been documenting the human rights situation in Tibet since 1959. Ten years ago in an exhaustive study "Tibet: Human Rights and the Rule of Law," (1997) the ICJ concluded that the Tibetan people have a right to self-determination and that a referendum of the Tibetan people to determine the future status of the region would significantly contribute to resolving the political conflict in Tibet.
For Further Information Please Contact the ICJ at: 0041 22 979
***18.03.2008. CHINA (TIBET): AUTHORITIES BLACK OUT INDEPENDENT COVERAGE OF DEADLY PROTESTS (IFEX/PEC)
The Chinese authorities have made it nearly impossible for independent journalists to cover the protests in Tibet and in neighbouring provinces by imposing "suffocating restrictions" on the press, from expelling foreign reporters to censoring news coverage.
Protests against 57 years of Chinese rule in Tibet started by Buddhist monks in the provincial capital Lhasa last week have turned into the largest demonstrations in nearly two decades and have triggered a violent reaction from the Chinese authorities.
Early eyewitness accounts and photos posted on the Internet portrayed a chaotic scene in Lhasa on 14 March, with security forces beating protesters, firing live ammunition, and surrounding monasteries, and crowds attacking security forces and setting fire to Chinese shops.
But reports of the number of people killed as a result of the protests cannot be verified because of official restrictions on reporting from Tibet. Tibet's government-in-exile in Dharamsala, India says as many as 100 people have been killed and 1,000 arrested. China's state media reports that 16 civilians have been killed.
According to news reports, China's government in Tibet has accused the supporters of Tibet's spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, of inciting the unrest to sabotage the Beijing Olympics. The authorities have imposed a curfew in Lhasa, deploying riot police to the streets. Freedom House reports that security forces are conducting house-to-house searches, rounding up hundreds of Tibetans suspected of participating in the protests. Troops have also been sent to quell sympathy protests that have spread to the neighbouring provinces of Sichuan, Qinghai and Gansu.
Since last week, the authorities have refused to grant foreign correspondents permits to enter Tibet for "safety" reasons, despite China's pledge in January 2007 to allow foreign journalists in China to freely carry out their work ahead of the Olympic Games, say Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). Tourists, who were some of the first to provide footage of the crackdown, are also being denied access, says RSF.
At least 25 journalists, including 15 from Hong Kong, have been expelled from Tibet and other areas of unrest for "illegal reporting", reports RSF. IFEX member the Hong Kong Journalists' Association (HKJA) says reporters from at least six Hong Kong media groups were ordered to leave Lhasa by plane. HKJA has called on the authorities to reconsider the expulsions.
The authorities have also censored foreign news and Internet reports from Tibet in mainland China. News reports on the issue on BBC and CNN have been periodically blacked out, and their websites made regularly inaccessible over the past few days, "leaving China's citizens in the dark about the unfolding tragedy," say PEN centres in Canada, the U.S. and China.
YouTube.com has been censored in China since 16 March after dozens of videos about protests in Tibet appeared on the popular video-sharing website, reports RSF. Internet users are presented with a black screen or the message "incorrect address" when trying to access the site.
There have also been reports of significant interruptions of telephone and Internet service in Lhasa and other Tibetan areas since 10 March, impeding the flow of first-hand reports as the protests spread, says PEN.
Meanwhile, rather than try and contain information, the Chinese state media are trying a different tack: publishing and broadcasting stories of Friday's "anti-Chinese" riots in Lhasa and the aftermath - with no mention of Tibetan casualties or the army being deployed. According to news reports, employees at the state television service CCTV's English service were instructed to keep broadcasting footage of burned-out shops and Chinese wounded in attacks. No peaceful demonstrators were shown.
Authorities are also allowing anti-Tibetan messages to get through, including websites that call for the murder of Tibetan "separatists", says RSF.
CPJ told news reporters that China's restrictions on reporting the Tibet protests were "a disturbing preview of the kind of blanket censorship journalists might face in August."
In an ominous turn for the Chinese authorities, who were hoping to have a smooth run-up to the Olympic Games, the street protests have broadened to outside of China's borders.
According to Human Rights Watch, there have been daily pro-Tibet protests around the world since last Monday. Fights broke out in front of China's embassy in Paris during a demonstration against Beijing's crackdown on protesters. French riot police used tear gas to disperse around 500 pro-Tibetan supporters.
Protests were also held in India, where mostly Tibetans marched through the streets in and around Dharamsala. Human Rights Watch reports that Indian police detained at least 100 exiled Tibetans who were trying to march from Dharamsala to Tibet on 10 March and slapped a restraining order barring protesters from leaving the district.
At least 12 monks were injured in Nepal on Friday when police broke up a march of 1,000 protesters in Kathmandu.
"The harsh crackdown on similar protests in democratic India and Nepal? raises concerns about whether China is pressuring those countries to silence Tibetans," Human Rights Watch says.
RSF is calling on heads of state to boycott the opening ceremonies of the Olympic Games to voice their disapproval with Beijing's policies.
The latest unrest in Tibet began as monks and activists staged protests in Lhasa and other regions on 10 March, the anniversary of the 1959 uprising which China suppressed with force and which led the Dalai Lama to flee to exile in India. Hundreds of monks from one monastery near Lhasa demanded the release of other monks jailed last year. Additional monks and ordinary Tibetans joined in, demanding independence and waving the Tibetan flag. Arrests ensued, leading to more protests.
***17.03.2008. TIBET. The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is extremely concerned for the welfare and safety of people in Tibet and neighbouring provinces who seek to disseminate information on the crisis in the region in the wake of an eruption of violence in Tibet’s capital, Lhasa, on March 14.
The IFJ also supports the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, in calling on China’s local and central authorities to allow people in Tibet to exercise their right to freedom of expression and assembly.
Reports of the number of people killed as a result of the protests cannot be verified because of official restrictions on reporting from Tibet. Xinhua, China's state-run press agency, said at the weekend that at least 10 people were killed on March 14. However, a spokesman for Tibet’s government in exile in Dharamsala, India, said witnesses in Tibet had reported counting at least 80 bodies since violence broke out.
As China’s authorities sought to restrict foreign and other journalists from travelling to Tibet at the weekend, the IFJ reminded the central Government of its commitment in early January to allow greater reporting access to foreign journalists in China for the Olympic Games in August.
According to reports in international media, foreign journalists were ordered out of the Tibetan parts of Gansu and Qinghai provinces on March 16 by police who told them it was for their own "safety".
The IFJ is informed that authorities in Tibet confiscated and deleted materials, including imagery and computer data, from some journalists.
While China’s domestic media has reported on the protests, the content of local reports focuses on the actions of protesters rather than authorities. Meanwhile, media restrictions in mainland China include periodic blackouts of CNN and a block on YouTube after images of the protests were uploaded onto the website. Some news reports express concerns about monitoring or blocking of mobile phone signals.
The latest unrest in Tibet began as monks and activists staged protests in Lhasa and other regions on March 10, the anniversary of the 1959 uprising which China suppressed with force and which led Tibet’s spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, to flee to exile in India.
“Suppression of free expression in China and Tibet and restrictions on matters of public concern brings to the fore the repeatedly expressed concerns of the IFJ and other press freedom groups about the reality of reporting on events in China,” said IFJ Asia-Pacific Director Jacqueline Park.
“Any claim by China’s authorities to support a free media must be delivered in good faith, and that means upholding the rights of journalists to report on all events and issues, and the rights of people to access information of importance to them.”
For further information contact IFJ Asia-Pacific on +612 9333 0919
***12.03.2008. Reporters Without Borders has launched the first Online Free Expression Day today.
“From now on, we will organise activities every 12 March to condemn cyber-censorship throughout the world,” Reporters Without Borders said. “A response of this kind is needed to the growing tendency to crack down on bloggers and to close websites."
“Today, the first time this day is being marked, we are giving all Internet users the opportunity to demonstrate in places were protests are not normally possible. We hope many will come and protest in virtual versions of Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, Cuba’s Revolution Square or on the streets of Rangoon, in Burma. At least 62 cyber-dissidents are currently imprisoned worldwide, while more than 2,600 websites, blogs or discussions forums were closed or made inaccessible in 2007.”
The press freedom organisation added: “Our list of ‘Internet Enemies’ has also been updated with the addition of two countries - Ethiopia and Zimbabwe. And we are offering an new version of our Handbook for Bloggers and Cyber-Dissidents.”
Reporters Without Borders learned last night that UNESCO has withdrawn its patronage for today’s Online Free Expression Day.
To denounce government censorship of the Internet and to demand more online freedom, Reporters Without Borders is calling on Internet users to come and protest in online versions of nine countries that are Internet enemies during the 24 hours from 11 a.m. tomorrow, 12 March, to 11 a.m. on 13 March (Paris time, GMT +1). Anyone with Internet access will be able to create an avatar, choose a message for their banner and take part in one of the cyber-demos taking place in Burma, China, Cuba, Egypt, Eritrea, North Korea, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam.
There are 15 countries in this year’s Reporters Without Borders list of “Internet Enemies” - Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam and Zimbabwe. There were only 13 in 2007. The two new additions to the traditional censors are both to be found in sub-Saharan Africa: Zimbabwe and Ethiopia.
“This is not at all surprising as these regimes regularly hound the traditional media,” Reporters Without Borders says in the introduction to its report.“Internet penetration is very slight, but nevertheless sufficient to give them a few nightmares. They follow the example of their seniors and draw on the full arsenal of online censorship methods including legislation, monitoring Internet cafés and controlling ISPs.”
There is also a supplementary list of 11 “countries under watch.” They are Bahrain, Eritrea, Gambia, Jordan, Libya, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Thailand, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. Unlike the “enemies,” these countries do not imprison bloggers or censor the Internet massively. But they are sorely tempted and abuses are common. Many of them have laws that they could use to gag the Internet if they wanted. And the judicial or political authorities often use anti-terrorism laws to identify and monitor government opponents and activists expressing themselves online.
“The hunting down of independent thinkers online is all the more effective as several major western companies have colluded with governments in pinpointing ‘trouble-makers’,” the reports says. “US company Yahoo! apologised in 2007 for a ‘misunderstanding’ which ended in journalist Shi Tao being sent to prison for ten years. The company has been responsible for the imprisonment of a total of four Chinese cyber-dissidents. It was apparently willing to ‘obey local laws’ that forced it to identify Internet users deemed to be dangerous.”
Finally, a new version of the Handbook for Bloggers and Cyber-Dissidents is available in French and English on the Reporters Without Borders website (www.rsf.org). It offers practical advice and techniques on how to start up a blog, how to blog for anonymously and how to circumvent censorship. It also includes the accounts of bloggers from countries such as Egypt and Burma.
**06.03.2008 Mexico: ARTICLE 19 Publishes Statement on Impunity for Press Crimes ARTICLE 19 has published a statement highlighting its serious concerns with the overall climate of impunity prevailing in cases of aggression against media personnel. ARTICLE 19's position on impunity and the responsibilities of the Mexican government were first discussed with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) Louise Arbour, on the occasion of her official visit to Mexico in February.
ARTICLE 19 considers impunity for press crimes to constitute one of the most alarming characteristics of the overall human rights situation in Mexico, and one that is gravely affecting the exercise of freedom of expression, and press freedom, said Dr. Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19's executive director.
"Impunity in place of justice is not acceptable. The limited efforts to date to tackle the problems and the even more limited results testify to the inability or unwillingness of the Mexican authorities to make the fight against impunity a priority" adds Dr. Callamard. This statement is motivated by the silence and seeming lack of political will of the present Government, led by President Felipe Calderon Hinojosa, to comply with the obligations of the Mexican State to prevent and investigate human rights violations within its national territory, including those committed by third parties, and bring to justice those responsible. The resulting circle of violence, danger, impunity, and self censorship is deeply affecting Mexican democracy, and is preventing the free circulation of ideas and information.
During its meeting with the UNHCHR, ARTICLE 19 respectfully called on Louise Arbour to request that the Mexican authorities abide by their international obligations, in particular to promptly and thoroughly investigate aggressions against journalists and bring to justice those responsible.
***03.03.2008. PEC Supports IFJ Call for United Nations “Urgent Action” Over Deadly Media Crisis in Iraq
The International Federation of journalists today called on the Secretary General of the United Nations to lead new efforts by the international community in defence of journalists and media in Iraq following the death last week of Shihab Al-Timimi, the President of the Iraqi Union of Journalists.
In a letter to UN chief Bang Ki-moon, the IFJ President and General Secretary say that the United Nations must raise its voice to protect journalists and media in Iraq and to encourage more effective action by the government of Iraq and those UN states who have pledged to bring about peace and reconciliation in the country.
“A timely statement of support from the United Nations for Iraqi journalism will show that the international community stands alongside the community of journalists in these dark days,” says the IFJ.
The IFJ, which has also written to Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Maliki, says the UN must support the Iraqi Union of Journalists (IUJ) and their campaign for safety, it must do more to put pressure on governments to defend independent media and it must reinforce efforts through the groundbreaking Security Council Resolution 1738 on journalists’ safety to find and prosecute those who are targeting and killing media workers.
In January the IFJ General Secretary led a mission to Baghdad to discuss plans to strengthen media freedom and improve safety. At that time the Government promised a report on journalists’ killings, but none has emerged.
The IFJ and the International News Safety Institute have worked with the IUJ and the Kurdistan Journalists’ Syndicate and leading Iraqi media companies to form the Iraq Media Safety group, which is dedicated to improving security for all media workers.
The IFJ says members of the IUJ “face the grim task of chronicling the violence in desperate and dangerous circumstances” including death threats and attempts by armed extremists to close down the union’s operations.
“If the United Nations can act decisively, it will not solve problems overnight, but it will make an immeasurable contribution towards reassuring Iraqi journalists that the international community recognises the current crisis,” says the IFJ, “and it will begin to repay some of the debt that we all owe Shihab A-Timimi and other media workers who have been sacrificed in this terrible conflict.”
***02.03.2008.In Mogadishu Media Crackdown, Media Executive Arrested, Equipment Confiscated
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) today condemns in the strongest possible terms the shocking attacks on Radio Shabelle and Radio Simba in Mogadishu by the Armed Forces of the Somalia Transitional Federal Government.
Today, 2 March 2008, the Armed forces forcefully entered the offices of Radio Simba and took away three computers, audio mixer, a computer laptop, two Audio tape recorders, two digital cameras and four studio microphones . During the attack, the forces had beaten reporter Abdiaziz Hussein Hassan, who was in the Simba news studio. Yesterday, 1 March 2008, a rocket hit the building of Radio Simba and destroyed the Radio’s archive.
Few minutes after the attack on Simba radio, the armed forces broke down the doors of Shabelle Radio, which is near to offices of Simba Radio, and took two audio mixers and main computer from the production studio. When leaving from Shabelle Offices, forces ordered Director of Shabele Muktar Mohamed Hirabe to go with them.
Security Forces also visited the Horn Afrik Radio and ordered to shut down the radio, but did not take any equipment, according to Horn Afrik journalists.
According to the journalists and management of these Radio stations, the attacks were to intimidate journalists and the media, and particularly these radio stations. Shabelle Radio contacted Government officials, when their offices were broken in, but no official came or ordered to end the attack, as said by Shabelle Management.
“We condemn these unacceptable attacks on the Radio Stations and call on the Transitional Government to ensure that those who carried out these attacks are identified and apprehended, together with whoever gave orders for this operation” said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General.
“Freedom of Muktar Mohamed Hirabe must be immediately returned and the Government must guarantee the return of the equipment of the Radio stations without damage” said Omar Faruk.
Government Forces are carrying out security operation in Bakara Market and entire Howl-Wadaag District, which situates in the centre of the city after heavy fighting in the capital between insurgents and Somali and Ethiopian soldiers.
NUSOJ rejects any attempt to muzzle or control the media and restrict journalists in times of security operations. “We believe that journalists' ability to report freely is essential to the nonviolent resolution of conflicts, and that suppression of the media during periods of unrest or armed operations only increases fear and suspicion among the people” Omar Faruk declared.
NUSOJ reiterates its deepest concern about the escalating attacks on Media and worsening security and safety of Media professionals by the armed groups, despite blood-spattered violence against journalists and media assistants last year.
National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) 1st Floor, Human Rights House, Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, Telephone: +252 1 859 944, Fax: +252-1-227942 E-mail: nusoj@nusoj.com, newsletter@nusoj.org Internet: http://www.nusoj.org
***01.03.2008. REPORTE 599 - OBSERVATORIO LATINOAMERICANO PARA LA LIBERTAD DE EXPRESION - AMÉRICA LATINA AGRESIONES A LA PRENSA SE HAN AGRAVADO EN LOS ÚLTIMOS AÑOS
La situación de violencia contra los periodistas se ha agravado 'muchísimo' en América Latina en los últimos años, denunció hoy la presidenta de la Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa de Colombia, María Teresa Ronderos. Ronderos participa con otros periodistas y jueces en un simposio sobre la impunidad de los crímenes contra la libertad de expresión que se celebra esta semana en Manila. En su opinión, indicó que los países más problemáticos son México, debido a la influencia del narcotráfico, y Venezuela, donde 'el propio Estado y agentes radicales prochavistas persiguen a la prensa crítica'. La presidenta de la fundación indicó a Efe que en Colombia 'ha mejorado después de haber pasado una época terrible en la que eran asesinados ocho o 10 periodistas al año', pero advirtió que existe un 'gobiernismo furibundo' que no tolera las críticas a la política del Ejecutivo. MÉXICO SIGUEN LOS ATROPELLOS CONTRA LA LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIÓN La situación de los periodistas en México es objetivamente muy delicada, según un informe difundido ayer por la Fundación Rory Peck, con sede en Londres. La mitad de los periodistas independientes -dice la investigación- aseguró haber recibido amenazas, que en un 51% provinieron del Gobierno, policías y militares, y en un 29% de particulares. Sólo un porcentaje menor de las amenazas tuvieron su origen directamente en el narcotráfico y el crimen organizado. "Amenazas, golpes, secuestros, desapariciones y hasta asesinatos. Estas son algunas de las condiciones más graves para trabajar en la cobertura informativa en México", afirmó la fundación. Y agregó que desde 2005 fueron asesinados "18 profesionales del medio periodístico", otros cinco desaparecieron, "cuatro redacciones de periódicos fueron víctimas de atentados con bombas y muchos más periodistas han sido lesionados y amenazados" en México. El documento difundido ayer se basó en entrevistas con 300 periodistas independientes mexicanos y con otros profesionales del sector realizadas en 2007 en 15 ciudades de ese país.(El Clarín)
Esta información es responsabilidad del Observatorio Latinoamericano para la Libertad de Expresión de la Federación Latinoamericana de Trabajadores de la Comunicación Social (FELATRACS). Para mayor información agradeceremos contactarnos vía e-mail: felatracs@felatracs.org ; Web: www.felatracs.org
***29.02.2008. IRAQ: TOP UN ENVOY SPEAKS OUT AGAINST ATTACKS ON JOURNALISTS New York, Feb 29 2008 10:00AM Strongly condemning attacks against media representatives in Iraq, a top United Nations envoy today deplored the assassination of a journalist in the war-torn nation.
Staffan de Mistura, the Secretary-General's Special Representative, expressed his condolences to the Iraqi Journalists' Union and to the family of Shihab al-Tamimi, who was killed on 23 February.
Attacks against media representatives are tantamount to "repressing press freedom and freedom of expression that are an essential component of democracy," he said in a statement issued in Baghdad. The killing of Mr. al-Tamimi is an example of the dangers faced daily by journalists in Iraq, he added.
Expressing solidarity with all Iraqi journalists, Mr. de Mistura said the courage they display will ensure that the tragic death of Mr. al-Tamimi will not intimidate them from carrying out their vital work.
***28.02.2008. JOURNALIST CONVICTED BY UN’S RWANDAN GENOCIDE TRIBUNAL TO END JAIL TERM IN ITALY New York, Feb 28 2008 2:00PM A journalist and presenter convicted by a United Nations war crimes tribunal for his work with a notorious Rwandan radio station that called for the killing of Tutsis during the country’s 1994 genocide will serve the remainder of his jail sentence in Italy.
Georges Omar Ruggiu, the only non-Rwandan to be convicted and sentenced by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) so far, was today transferred by military aircraft from the Tribunal’s custody in Arusha, Tanzania, to detention in Italy.
The 50-year-old, who holds Belgian and Italian nationality, pleaded guilty at the ICTR to two counts of direct and public incitement to commit genocide and crimes against humanity and was sentenced to 12 years in prison in June 2000. He had been in custody since July 1997.
Mr. Ruggiu had worked from January to July 1994 with Radio Television Libre des Milles Collines (RTLM), whose broadcasts had been used by Hutu extremists to whip up hatred against Tutsis and identify individuals for subsequent killing.
His transfer to Italy is the result of an agreement signed by the Government of the European country and the UN in March 2004 to enforce ICTR prison sentences.
The Security Council set up the ICTR in 1994 in response to that year’s genocide, during which some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered – often by machete or club – in just 100 days starting in early April.
***27.02.2008. IFJ Mourns Loss of President of Iraqi Union of Journalists after Terror Attack (Read also Pec News, Press)
The International Federation of Journalists today expressed deep regret and shock at the death of the President of the Iraqi Union of Journalists in Baghdad who has succumbed to wounds sustained in a targeted attack by gunmen at the weekend.
Shihab Al-Timimi, 75, suffered a heart attack today and died in hospital where he was taken after sustaining wounds to the stomach, shoulder and face when his car was hit by a hail of bullets in the attack. His son Rabei was also in the car and was slightly injured.
“This assassination of a courageous and veteran champion of journalists’ rights causes deep pain for all of us,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “Journalists all around the world share the grief of our Iraqi colleagues. We send them our deepest sympathy and we pledge to stand alongside them in defiance of the killers.”
The IFJ has worked with the Iraqi union to improve safety for the country’s media in response to more than 250 killings of journalists and media staff since the conflict started in 2003.
A delegation of the IFJ visited Baghdad last month to discuss with Al-Timimi and the union’s secretary general Moaid Al-Lami – both of whom have received numerous death threats from extremists – plans to strengthen media freedom and levels of protection for journalists.
“Shihab reflected the indomitable spirit of Iraqi journalism,” said White. “He has provided leadership and a positive vision for the future during these dark days. He gave his life for the independence and solidarity of the profession and all of us owe him a great and lasting debt.”
The IFJ has reiterated its call on the Iraqi authorities to find the killers who struck just after a meeting where union leaders had put the finishing touches to plans for a seminar on the safety of journalists.
The seminar, held earlier this week, is part of the work plan of the Iraq Media Safety Group, supported by leading media and the journalists’ union, and created with the support of the IFJ and the International News Safety Institute last year.
“The work will go on and Iraqi journalists will not be intimidated,” said White. “But all of us are deeply saddened by this loss.”
International Federation of Journalists From the PresidentTo: All IFJ Member Unions
Dear friends, It is with a sorrowful heart that I write to inform you of the death a few hours ago of the Iraqi Journalists Union’s President Shihab Al-Timimi. Shihab was gunned down in a drive-by shooting last Saturday, and although he survived the attack his state worsened and this afternoon he suffered a fatal heart attack. His 23-year-old son Rabea was also wounded.
I have known Shihab for many years as a fellow journalist and trade unionist who survived many confrontations. He was an old fighter who spent his life defending journalists and journalism. His effervescent personality brought smiles and laughter to people beyond Iraq.
Shihab was killed by fanatics as he was working to carry on doing what he had dedicated his life to – improving the safety of Iraqi journalists and fighting to preserve their independence and professionalism.
It is a sad day for us and for the world community of journalists, and our thoughts and condolences go to his family and to his union. We are determined to continue our work in support of the IJU and Shihab’s vision of peace and social justice. We will be urging our affiliates worldwide to contribute to a project to commemorate his life and achievements.
Jim Boumelha
PRESIDENT February 27th 2008 International Federation of Journalists, International Press Centre, Résidence Palace, Block C, 155 Rue De La Loi, B1040 Brussels Tel: +32 2 235 2200 Fax: +32 2 235 2219 E-mail: jim.boumelha@ifj.org
***26.02.2008. BURMA: JUNTA CONTINUES TO ATTACK MEDIA (IFEX, MIZZIMA NEWS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH)
Despite plans for a constitutional referendum in May and other promises of reform, the Burmese junta continues to crack down on the country's struggling independent media, say Mizzima News, Human Rights Watch and other IFEX members.
Two Burmese journalists are the most recent targets. Thet Zin and Sein Win Aung, the editor and office manager of the magazine "Myanmar Nation", were arrested on 15 February and are being detained without charge. Police carried out a search of their office and confiscated documents, including a copy of UN Special Rapporteur Paula Sergio Pinheiro's report on Burma, and material on the September protests in Rangoon.
According to Mizzima News, the country's censorship board, the Press Scrutiny and Registration Division, has instructed the publisher to stop publishing the weekly journal.
"Burma's military regime has once again shown its intolerance toward different political viewpoints by arresting journalists who were doing nothing more than reporting news and opinions," says Human Rights Watch. "How can the Burmese authorities create even the semblance of a credible constitutional referendum in May when it won't allow journalists to report the news?"
In the wake of the September protests, the Burmese junta continues to arrest journalists and political activists. According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), 11 journalists are known to be detained in Burma, including 78-year-old U Win Tin, who has been in jail since July 1989.
Mizzima News reports that a blogger, Nay Phone Latt, who was thought to have disappeared in January, has actually been arrested and is being held under the Emergency Provision Act.
In another case, poet Saya Saw Wai was arrested on 22 January and is still in detention for his Valentine's Day poem that carried a hidden message that called the country's military ruler "power crazy."
The journalists and writers add to the more than 1,800 political prisoners who are still behind bars, says Human Rights Watch.
The latest harassment against journalists follows recent official edicts on the press. Human Rights Watch reports that the junta recently announced that all domestic copy, including work online, must be vetted by the Press Scrutiny Board.
According to the Burmese news magazine "The Irrawaddy", the junta has also banned reporters from covering a number of governmental meetings which, in the past, they attended.
Several Rangoon newspapers were ordered to publish government-written opinion pieces characterising the pro-democracy protests as a threat to national security, and journalists are banned from publishing at all if their stories are deemed critical of the military or expose human rights concerns, or are sympathetic to the opposition.
The junta has also reduced Internet speed and bandwidth, making it more difficult to send and receive high resolution images and large files. The government action hit many Internet cafés, which are one of the few ways citizens can get online access.
Human Rights Watch says the authorities are not interested in real reform, even as plans go ahead for a constitutional referendum in May. "The arrests of journalists and repression of access to information deny the Burmese people any real opportunity to debate the proposed new constitution," says Human Rights Watch.
Some Burmese observers are also cynical of the UN's role. The UN Special Envoy to Burma, Ibrahim Gambari, is in China, India, and other Asian countries this week to gather support for his efforts to foster political reform in Burma. But observers note that on previous visits Gambari has made little headway and has been virtually a prisoner of the government.
"Aside from earning him frequent flyer mileage on his Asian tours, Gambari's mission is as dead as Burma's pro-democracy movement," says the "The Irrawaddy".
Human Rights Watch is hoping the generals' backers in Beijing, Bangkok and New Delhi will be more successful in pressing the junta to respect human rights. In that vein, opposition activists are calling for a boycott of China's Olympics to pressure Beijing to stop supporting the Burmese military government.
***13.02.2008. RSF press release: Annual Press Freedom Report 2008 REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS CRITICISES LACK OF PUBLIC COMMITMENT TO PRESS FREEDOM AND FEARS ANTI-MEDIA VIOLENCE IN COMING MONTHS
The plight of journalists in 98 countries reviewed
Reporters Without Borders today accused public officials around the world of "impotence, cowardice and duplicity" in defending freedom of expression.
"The spinelessness of some Western countries and major international bodies is harming press freedom," secretary-general Robert Ménard said in the organisation's annual press freedom report, out today (13 February) and available at http://www.rsf.org . "The lack of determination by democratic countries in defending the values they supposedly stand for is alarming."
He charged that the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva had caved in to pressure from countries such as Iran and Uzbekistan and expressed concern at the softness of the European Union towards dictators who did not flinch at the threat of European sanctions.
The report's introduction listed problems expected in the coming year, especially physical attacks on journalists during key elections in Pakistan (18 February), Russia (2 March), Iran (14 March) and Zimbabwe (29 March).
The worldwide press freedom organisation voiced concern about the safety of journalists covering fighting in Sri Lanka, the Palestinian Territories, Somalia, Niger, Chad and especially Iraq, where it said "journalists continue to be buried almost every week."
It also protested against censorship of new media (mobile phones transmitting photos and film and video-sharing and social networking websites) and highlighted media repression in China in the run-up to the Olympic Games there this summer.
"Nobody apart from the International Olympic Committee seems to believe the government will make a significant human rights concession before the Games start," it said. "Every time a journalist or blogger is released, another goes into prison. (. . . ) China's dissidents will probably be having a hard time this summer."
The report includes surveys of press freedom in every region of the world over the past year and chapters on 98 countries, including European Union members and the United States.
***08.02.2008. WAN press release - 95 Journalists Killed Worldwide in 2007
Paris, 7 February 2008 - Ninety-five journalists and other media workers were killed world-wide because of their professional activities in 2007, with Iraq and other conflict zones accounting for more than two-thirds of the deaths, the World Association of Newspapers said Thursday.
Forty-four journalists and other media workers were killed in Iraq last year. Somalia was the second deadliest place for journalists, with eight killed, followed by Sri Lanka (6) and Pakistan (5).
The 2007 death toll, released after investigation into all potential media murders, is the second highest since WAN began tracking annual deaths in 1998. It compares with 110 killed in 2006, 58 killed in 2005, 72 killed in 2004, and 53 killed in 2003.
"Iraq continues to be the deadliest country in the world for media, and the rising number of journalists killed in all conflicts is a cause for deep concern," said Timothy Balding, Chief Executive Officer of the Paris-based WAN.
Journalists in many countries are also being targeted and killed for investigating organised crime, drug trafficking, corruption and other crimes. "In the vast majority of cases, nobody is brought to justice for their murders," said Mr Balding.
Journalists and other media workers were killed in 25 countries and territories in 2007: Afghanistan (2); Brazil (1); Burma (1); China (1); Democratic Republic of the Congo (2); El Salvador (1); Eritrea (2); Guatemala (1); Haiti (2); Honduras (1); Iraq (44); Kyrgyzstan (1); Mexico (3); Nepal (3); Pakistan (5); Palestinian Territories (2); Paraguay (1); Peru (1); Philippines (2); Russia (2); Somalia (8); Sri Lanka (6); Turkey (1); United States (1); and Zimbabwe (1).
Five journalists have already been killed in 2008, in Afghanistan, Brazil, Honduras, Iraq and Nepal.
Several press freedom organisations track the number of journalists killed each year. The numbers vary based on the criteria used by different associations. WAN's figures include all media workers killed in the line of duty or targeted because of their work. It also includes cases where the motive for the killings is unsure or where investigations have not been completed.
The Paris-based WAN, the global organisation for the newspaper industry, defends and promotes press freedom world-wide. It represents 18,000 newspapers; its membership includes 77 national newspaper associations, newspapers and newspaper executives in 102 countries, 12 news agencies and nine regional and world-wide press groups.
For further information, contact Larry Kilman at WAN, 7, rue Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 75005 Paris, France, tel: +33 14 742 8500, fax: +33 14 742 4948, e-mail: lkilman@wan.asso.fr, Internet: http://www.wan-press.org
***05.02.2008. IFJ Urges Iran to Overturn Death Sentence against Journalist
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called on the Iranian government to overturn the death sentence handed down against journalist Adnan Hassanpour, who has been detained for over a year and convicted of spying.
“We believe that Mr. Hassanpour was targeted because of his writing on Kurdish issues for the weekly Asou, which was banned by the ministry of culture and Islamic orientation in August 2005, and his contributions to foreign media, including Voice of America and Radio Farda,” IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said in a letter to Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, who is head of the judiciary.
The IFJ has written the letter to urge the government to overturn the death sentence against Hassanpour. While his conviction on charges of “subversive activities against national security, “espionage” and “separatist propaganda” was not linked to his writings, the IFJ fears that they were motivated by his outspoken writing and reporting. The IFJ has no information that Hassanpour was involved in any espionage.
The IFJ is calling on its member unions to send their own letters to Shahroudi to protest the death sentence handed down for Hassanpour.
Hassanpour was sentenced to death in July 2007 and the sentence was confirmed by the Tehran Supreme Court in November.
In his letter, White urged Shahroudi to “show that the Iranian judicial system is not being used to stifle freedom of expression. We ask you to release him immediately and clear him of the unfair charges against him.
Iran has one of the highest numbers of annual executions in the world, often hanging or stoning people to death in public for crimes ranging from murder to adultery.
The IFJ is supporting a campaign by its Italian member, Federazione Nazionale della Stampa Italiana, and other press freedom group to lobby the government for Hassanpour’s release.
***19.01.2008. Turkey: On first anniversary of editor’s murder Hrant Dink, authorities urged to prosecute all those involved (RSF)
On the eve of the first anniversary of the death of Hrant Dink, Reporters Without Borders pays tribute to his courage and reiterates its solidarity with his family and fellow journalists who defend his memory. The editor of the Armenian- and Turkish-language weekly Agos, Dink was gunned outside the newspaper’s office in Istanbul on 19 January 2007, in a murder that caused an outcry in Turkey and throughout the world.
“The authorities must push ahead with the investigation in order to identify all those, whoever they are, who were involved in this terrible crime, one that had all the elements of a tragedy foretold,” Reporters Without Borders said. “The authorities must show they are capable of shouldering their share of the blame for this murder and they must embark on a thorough overhaul of Turkey’s legislation and the way the state apparatus operates.
“Amending or repealing article 301 of the criminal code, which punishes ‘humiliating the Turkish identity,’ is an escapable part of the reform process, and we encourage the authorities to do it as quickly as possible.
“This is the only way to ensure that Dink is the last victim of hatred in Turkey,” Reporters Without Borders added. “Let us not forget that about 100,000 people marched behind Dink’s coffin on 23 January 2007. Let us not forget that they chanted : ‘We are all Hrant Dink, we are all Armenians’.”
The first one-day hearing in the trial of Dink’s alleged murderers was held in the Istanbul suburb of Besikta on 2 July. The second was held on 1 October and the next is to take place on 11 February. There is no longer any doubt about the identify of the youth who fired the shots, Ogün Samast, and his accomplices Erhan Tuncel and Yasin Hayal, said to be the masterminds. The essential issue raised by the trial is the involvement of the security forces in the murder, whether in its gestation or execution or in support for the three leading defendants afterwards.
The Dink family lawyers have on several occasions complained about the destruction of evidence and the refusal of the authorities to go after members of the police or gendarmerie. One of the most glaring examples is a phone conversation between Tuncel and Mühittin Zenit, a policeman based in the northeastern city of Trabzon, where most of the 19 defendants are from. It took place half an hour after Dink’s murder and shows that Zenit had been aware of a plan to kill Dink. He has nonetheless been transferred to the Department of Intelligence.
Fethiye Cetin, one of the Dink family lawyers, also points out that the video of the murder that was recorded by a surveillance camera outside a bank located next to the newspaper was never viewed because the police did not request the recording in time.
Interior minister Besir Atalay nonetheless told parliament this week : “The justice system is functioning well in the Dink case. No dimension of this event has remained outside its scope.” Bahri Bayram Belen, another of the Dink family lawyers, immediately responded : “Unnecessary administrative decisions blocked judicial investigations of state employees that should have been carried out.” He added : “Since the initial investigation, certain enquiries (...) have not been appropriately conducted because the security forces did not participate.”
Parliament is looking into the case. An investigative sub-commission of the human rights commission began on 4 January to conduct enquiries aimed at clarifying the circumstances in which the murder took place. Headed by a former journalist, Mehmet Ocaktan, it has already conducted investigations in Istanbul and Trabzon.
The irregularities have been confirmed by another parliamentary commission of enquiry. Its report said : “Although interior minister experts thought Directorate of Security officials in Istanbul, both senior and junior, could be held responsible for failing in their duty to supervise (before the murder), only one judicial investigation into the head of the police intelligence service in Istanbul, A. Ilhan Güler, was authorised.”
The prime minister’s office has meanwhile announced that it has completed its own report after eight months of investigation. The prime minister agreed to conduct this investigation in April after getting a letter from Dink’s daughter, Rakel Dink, in which she referred to the many irregularities and said she feared that justice would never de done.
Another recent development is the emergence of the possibility that Samast, the main defendant, could be older than his ID papers say. Doctors who examined him in May concluded that he could be 18, not 17. The court must rule on this question, which could have a major impact on the trial. If the court decides that Samast is not, after all, a minor, the trial should be declared open to the public, while Samast would face the possibility of life imprisonment instead of a 20-year sentence.
Dink was the victim of a state-endorsed nationalism that bans any mention of certain aspects of Turkish history such as the genocide of Armenians in the last years of the Ottoman empire. This nationalism finds expression in article 301 of the criminal code, entitled “Humiliation of Turkish identity, the republic and the institutions or organs of the state,” under which “openly humiliating the government, the judicial organs of the state, or the military or police structures” is punishable for six months to three years in prison.
Dink had been prosecuted under this article. His son, Arat Dink, was give a suspended sentence of a year in prison on 11 October for publishing in Agos the interview father had given to Reuters in which he said the massacres of Armenians from 1915 to 1917 constituted genocide. In all, 120 people have been prosecuted under the article, which has emerged as major tool for restricting free speech since it took effect in 2005. The authorities have repeatedly stated their intention of amending the article. Justice minister Mehmet Ali Sahin, for example, told the Anatolia news agency on 6 November that the government had decided to amend it. He said the cabinet would consider the various amendment proposals “at the first opportunity.” At the start of this month, the justice ministry submitted a draft amendment to the national assembly’s laws commission, which must now examine it. It proposes replacing “humiliating the Turkish identity” by “humiliating the Turkish people” and “humiliating the republic” by “humiliating the Turkish republic.” It proposes eliminating paragraph 4 of the article that says “any expression of thought in the form of criticism cannot be sanctioned.”
The proposed amendment would also reduce the maximum penalty from three years in prison to two. The justice ministry’s permission would henceforth be required for anyone to be prosecuted under the article. (The new deputy prime minister, former justice minister Cemil Ciçek, thinks a commission, rather than the ministry itself, should decide whether to give permission.) And finally, it would also eliminate paragraph 3, which says : “If a Turkish citizen living abroad humiliates the Turkish identity, the penalty is increased by a third.”
This falls well short of satisfying Reporters Without Borders, which calls for the complete repeal of article 301, as the proposed amendment offers no solution to the problem of the article’s arbitrary application by judges.
***09.01.2008. Palestinian Centre for Development & Media Freedoms (Mada): more than two hundred and fifty violations of media freedoms through 2007, which Stained in journalists blood, and is the worst in terms of violations from Palestinian sides
Last year is considered one of the worst on Palestinian media since the establishment of the Palestinian National Authority on 1993, it has witnessed more than two hundred and fifty media freedom violations, more than half of them and the worst were committed by Palestinian sides, especially in February, May, June, November, because of the intensification of the conflict between Fatah and Hamas movements, which deepened after Hamas control on the Gaza Strip, on the middle of last June.
Three media workers have been executed (Suleiman Al-Ashie, Mohamed Abdou, from Felesteen newspaper, Issam Al-Joujo from the site news Palestine Live), tens of journalists were attacked, a lot were threatened detained, and arrested, , the headquarters of media outlets, were seized, their equipment was confiscated or damaged, some of them were prevented from work, such as: Palestine Public Television, Sawt Al-Omal Radio, Voice of Palestine Radio, Sawt Al-Hureya Radio, Sawt Al-Sha'b Radio, etc. .. in Gaza City, Aqsa Television Office in Ramallah, Jabal Al-Nar Radio, Afaq local TV, Ruwwad Press Office, in Nablus, Albian Press Office in Salfit .. etc., and newspapers were prevented from printing and distribution: Felesteen and Al-Resalah in West Bank and Al-Sabah in Gaza Strip.
The past year has witnessed the continuation of the foreign journalists kidnapping phenomenon, despite the decline compared to the previous year, (photographer France Press Agency Jaime Rarzuri and BBC correspondent Alan Johnston, who has been subjected to the longer period of abduction, which lasted from March 12 to July 4), while Six journalists have been kidnapped the previous year. The security chaos led to the departure of foreign journalists of the Gaza Strip, where the international media asked its local correspondents to cover events there. Some Arab media is not spared from violations, especially in light of the accusations that were directed from Fatah movement to Al-Jazeera Channel of being biased to Hamas, and Hamas accusations of Al-Arabia Channel bias to Fatah Movement (Al-Arabia office was blown up in February 2007). For the first time since the establishment of the Palestinian National Authority, journalists has been brought to trail (A'la Taiti and Osaid Amarneh from Aqsa TV), and areas were the announced as closed military zones to prevent journalists from events covering in which there were marches and press conferences.
Campaigns of incitement in the media which belongs to both parties escalated, and reached to high degree of bathos and platitudes and defamation, especially in some electronic news sites, in addition to the accusations of heavy-caliber, including accusations of betrayal and compromise the fundamental rights of the Palestinian people, this situation has resulted in dropping of Palestinian media to low levels, hasten its going away from professional standards, thereby exacerbating the many problems already exists, so Palestinian citizen were deprived from correct information from local sources often, that’s lead to continued escape of readers, listeners and viewers from it ,and to follow Arab and foreign media.
The intensification of conflict in the Palestinian arena enhance polarization in media, and divided it vertically, especially after geographical division, which happened after Hamas control over Gaza Strip, what's has increased the intensity of polarization is that the media loyal to Fatah or belong to Palestinian Authority has become banned from work in Gaza, Hamas media, or pro-Hamas became banned from work in West Bank, that was combined with increasing pressure on few independent media outlets to bias to one of the two parties, journalists are became afraid to cover internal events in a lot of cases, for fear of angering both parties, that’s led to the strengthening of self-censorship among journalists and media outlets editors.
The so many and serious media freedoms violations, that have occurred during the past year, in addition to the decisions and actions, which prevented peaceful gatherings and demonstrations, and the necessity to get the journalistic card from the Ministry of Information of the dismissed Government in Gaza Strip, had seriously affected the right of journalists and citizens to freedom of the press and of opinion and expression in Palestinian territories, which is guaranteed by the Palestinian basic law, and the Printing and Publications law, in addition to 2international charters, especially Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human R2ights, so it was not surprising that the Palestinian territories ranked in 158 place in the classification of the annual World Press Freedom last year, out of 169 countries, according to Reporters Without Borders(RSF), while ranked in 134 place in 2006.
Israel as occupation state was and still interested in hiding its crimes, and pe2rsistent violations of Palestinian rights (the most prominent example of this is what was happening in Bail'in and Um Salamonah villages, though what the press was covering is a weekly peaceful activities, with the participation of a world peace activists, and activists even from Israel itself), so they were targeting of journalists, in order to terrorize and terrify them, to stop covering its crimes and practices, contrary to all international norms and laws in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The international lukewarm and sometimes careless reactions, to Israel's media freedoms violations, in the occupied Palestinian territories, has encouraged them to continue their violations, which were continued since long ago, even to preserve in it.
The Israeli occupation forces has continued to violate media freedoms over the past year, the most serious was the attempt to murder Aqsa TV cameraman Imad Ghanem, in front of eyes of the viewers, in live broadcast on Al-Jazeera live, and has continued attacks on journalists especially during the coverage of peaceful demonstrations against the construction of apartheid wall, and the repeated incursions of Palestinian regions and cities, also continued its raids on the headquarters of media outlets especially in Nablus city, where they confiscated equipment and issued closure orders of television stations, arrested journalists and brought them to trial or administrative detention, and continued to limit the journalists ability of movement to cover events, prevented many of them from traveling, and barred entry of newspapers published in the West Bank to Gaza Strip, for different periods.
The failure to prosecute the aggressors against journalists and media institutions and to bring them to justice in previous years, whether from the Palestinian side or the Israeli, had contributed to the increase of media violations during the past year. While we express our strong condemnation of all attacks on journalists and media outlets, we hope that the current year would witness a significant improvement on freedom of opinion and expression, and halting of media freedoms violation in Palestinian territories, despite our conviction that without the withdrawal of Israeli occupation forces from the Palestinian territories, and without the rule of law in the Palestinian territories, it is difficult to talk about serious decline in of media freedoms violation, therefore Mada center is: - Demanding Salam Fayyad Government, and Ismail Haniya dismissed Government to respect freedom of opinion and expression, prosecute the aggressors against journalists and media outlets, and bring them to justice. - Demanding the international community to put pressure on the Israeli government to stop its attacks against journalists, and to prosecute those responsible for attacks on journalists and media outlets, and bring them to justice. - Calling on journalists and media outlets to adhere to professional standards, and to stop exercising self-censorship. Ramallah - January 9, 2008. For further information: Mousa Rimawi madapalestine@yahoo.com
***02.01.2008. Targeting Truth Tellers: Journalism in a Climate of Fear and Intimidation Annual Report of Press Freedom Violations in Somalia (NUSOJ)
The freedom of the press situation in Somalia deteriorated considerably in 2007, as violence against journalists and media workers - such as killings, detentions, acts of intimidation, harassment and other forms of attack - increased unabated in comparison to previous years, the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) said in its 2007 Annual Report of Press Freedom Violations.
The Annual Report, "Targeting Truth Tellers: Journalism in a Climate of Fear and Intimidation", documents cases of media people killed, injured, arrested, robbed, intimidated, expelled, kidnapped, beaten and censored during 2007. The report also covers cases of media houses closed down, attacked and banned.
"Journalists became victims of the increasing conflict and insecurity that has plagued Somalia for 17 years" said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. "Somali journalists constantly face attack, while those who intimidate journalists benefit from impunity from prosecution," Faruk added.
In 2007, eight media workers were killed as a result of antagonistic action and one died by accident; four media workers were wounded; 53 media workers were arrested; five media houses were closed down; and more than 55 journalists fled the country. Scores of journalists and media workers were intimidated and robbed. In addition, many journalists were verbally abused by members of political groups.
"Violations of press freedom increased 85 percent compared to the previous year. Several attacks against journalists' rights and freedom of the press happened and were not reported because of the victims' fear of reprisal", Faruk declared.
Consequently, Somalia turned into the deadliest country for journalists in Africa and the second most dangerous one for media professionals in the world. Safety of media professionals depends on the general situation of the country, but their journalistic work singles them out and raises the dangers they are exposed to. "Journalists are ordinary people, have no special defences and are frontline targets" Faruk said.
As the targeted attacks against journalists and other violations of press freedom increase horrifically, still media professionals are not safe anywhere in country. "Lack of prompt, thorough and impartial investigations perpetuate an entrenched culture of impunity," Faruk said.
"Hostility and threats against Somali journalists have cultivated an environment of terror and insecurity that slowed down independent journalism and promoted self-censorship as a form of protection. Significant numbers of journalists chose to work in secret. Many journalists are also victims of the political slant of the news media organisations that they work for. Through protest and solidarity actions and the publication of this report, NUSOJ challenges those that violate press freedom and fundamental human rights of journalists in Somalia," Faruk added.
NUSOJ remains steadfast in its mission to defend and promote journalists' rights and freedom of the press. It boldly speaks out on behalf of Somali journalists, especially those who are in risk.
For further information, contact Omar Faruk Osman, Secretary-General, NUSOJ, 1st Floor, Human Rights House, Taleex Street, KM4 Area, Hodan District, Mogadishu, Somalia, tel/fax: +252 1 859 944, e-mail: nusoj@yahoo.com, Internet: http://www.nusoj.org
***31.12.2007. “Tragedy Unlimited” Says IFJ as Killings of Journalists in 2007 Maintain Record Levels
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today said that violence against journalists in 2007 has reached extreme levels for the third year in succession with 171 confirmed deaths, just below the record set a year ago.
Conflicts in Iraq, Pakistan and Somalia have proved the most dangerous for journalists in a year that has confirmed the high rates of killings in recent years and “tragedy unlimited” for thousands within the global media community.
In 2006 the IFJ confirmed 177 journalists and other media workers killed. At the year's end 2007 proved only slightly less deadly -- with 171 deaths. The figures have been compiled in co-operation with the International News Safety Institute.
“Violence against journalists remains at extremely high levels for the third year in a row,” said IFJ President Jim Boumelha. “The scale of attacks on journalists marks a continuing crisis filled with unlimited human tragedy and relentless attacks on press freedom.”
Boumelha called for more action from the international community to counter impunity and to eliminate fear and danger from the profession of journalism. “Our colleagues have been targeted because of their work, or killed covering dangerous stories often in the rush to cover breaking news,” he said.
There have been more accidental deaths this year and the IFJ says the threats of targeting particularly in combat zones like Iraq continue unabated. As well as the heavy toll in Iraq, there were multiple media killings in Somalia and Afghanistan. Unrest in Sri Lanka and Pakistan also led to journalists’ deaths.
In Africa violent attacks on journalists have continued and the brutal repression of free expression in Eritrea has led to two deaths there this year.
Coverage of drug traffickers led to another high death toll in Mexico. Throughout Latin America journalists were killed for reporting on criminal gangs, drug running and shady politics.
“As usual those most at risk are media staff operating in their home country,” said Boumelha. “Violence against media is particularly evident in countries where the political situation is unstable. It is no coincidence that countries like Somalia and Pakistan are two of the most dangerous this year.”
The IFJ includes all journalists killed because of their work, including targeted murders, and deaths while covering violent events. It also counts deaths where journalists are killed in accidents while on assignment or on their way to or from a story.
In Iraq, which has been the deadliest country for journalists since the US invasion in 2003, at least 65 journalists and media staff have been killed this year. Of those killed, it is believed that all but one was an Iraqi national.
The full IFJ report with details of each case is released in mid-January based upon conclusion of the cases under investigation.
The IFJ’s study makes it clear that local journalists are the most vulnerable to attack. In the vast majority of the cases this year, the media workers targeted were working for national or regional media and were killed in their own communities. It also highlights the problem of impunity that continues to plague the media sector. Many of this year’s crimes are unsolved and will remain so.
IFJ General Secretary Aidan White, who this week joined a fresh appeal for action over impunity arising out of the United Nations Security Council resolution issued a year ago calling on all governments to confront the crisis of violence against media, said, “Many killers of journalists are just getting away with murder. Governments must take these issues seriously. Every case must be investigated. Those responsible must be punished.”
White, accompanied by Canadian journalists’ leader Peter Murdoch, and IFJ Middle East Coordinator Monir Zaarour is visiting Baghdad this week to discuss security with IFJ affiliates the Iraqi Syndicate of Journalists and the Kurdistan Syndicate of Journalists.
Despite the increased attacks, the IFJ says, journalists are still covering news no matter how dangerous it is. “We salute all of our colleagues out there who face danger as they try to provide news for their communities,” said Boumelha. “We will continue our fight to make sure that safety conditions improve.”
The IFJ recorded the following information for deaths of media workers in 2007:
• Murders and violent deaths 134 • Deaths in accidents 37 • The deadliest region was the Middle East with 68 killed • Deadliest Countries (for killings) were Iraq (65), Somalia (8) and Pakistan (7) • Other hotspots were Mexico (6), Sri Lanka (6) and Philippines (5)
For more information contact: IFJ President Jim Boumelha in London at +44 18 65 72 34 50 IFJ Human Rights and Information Officer Rachel Cohen in New York at +32 484 597 591
***28.12.2007. Pakistan: six journalists were killed, three of them while performing their professional duties, 73 were injured, mostly by the police in the worst year for the journalists in a decade while media remained under government pressure through laws and threat, Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), said in a report release on Sunday.
"Unprecedented incidents of violence and curbs on media remained the hallmark of 2007," PFUJ said in a report at the end of the year. Beside killing of journalists media houses were attacked, raided by the police and security agencies and freedom of the Press came under attack as a result of two ordinance against media after the promulgation of emergency. Those journalists killed include Zubair Ahmed Mujahid of daily Jang, who was killed in Mirpurkhas by unidentrified men, Mehboob Khan, freelance journalist killed in Charsada, during the bomb blast on the rally of former Interior Minister Aftab Ahmed Khan Sherpao, Noor Ahmed Khan, killed in Bajour during a roadside blast, Javed Khan, photojournalists for daily Markaz was killed while covering Lal masjid battle in Islamabad, Mohammad Arif Khan, cameraman of ARYONE WORLD, killed during the bomb blast on Benazir Bhutto's procession on October 18, and Rab Nawaz Chandio, reporter for daily Halchal, killed by unknown person in Thatta. PFUJ, the representative body of the journalists in Pakistan , said the year witnessed "growing menace of police brutality" against journalists as some 73 journalists including photo-journalists, cameramen were badly beaten, causing serious injuries to at least 30, who go head injuries. The latest was on December 17, when Aaj reporter Mohammad Usman was admitted to hospital after several head injuries. Throughout the year the private news channels remained under pressure and as a result time and again GEO, ARY, Aaj, SINDH TV, KTN, Kyber were put off air, but on Nov 3rd, some 45 channels and two FM-radio were put off air through a verbal orders of the authorities for over three weeks. PFUJ launched a protest movement against the curbs on the media, which has now been suspended after 55 days due to the tragic death of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto. The campaign was launched for the withdrawal of anti-Press laws, lifting of restrictions and ban on tv channels, held protest rallies, demonstration and set-up camps during which over 200 journalists were detained, several were beaten by police. - Later, government allowed all channels and FM-99 and 103, after seeking "assurance," but the mainstream news channels GEO news and GEO Supper (Sports) remained off air. Worst violent incident against journalists took place on September 29th, in Islamabad, when police attacked journalists outside the Election Commission office. At least 43 were injured, many recieved head injuries while on the same day in Peshawar, police injured four journalists during a protest against Islamabad incident. The ex-CJP after a suo-moto action suspended senior police officials after looking into the evidence and vedio of police brutality. Earlier, in March, police used baton-charge against journalists covering the rally of former chief justice of Pakistan, Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, in which 10 journalists were injured. Police were again found involve in beating journalists in Lahore and last month in Karachi, during which several journalists were injured. PFUJ, is deeply concerned and shocked over treatment of journalists across the country on the hands of state machinery. The year have seen an unprecedented rise in violence against journalists with some areas. Reporting become most difficult in the militancy hit areas like Wana, Wazirstan, Swat and the nearby areas. Journalists also faced difficculties in reporting in many parts of Baluchistan and interior of Sindh, particularly if they report on Baluchistan operation or on forced marriages, jirga in Sindh. Two reporters Latif Khosa and Riaz Mengal were kidnapped in Baluchistan while three reporters left their native towns in Sindh, after reporting on social issues.The media house which came under attack include Aaj office in Karachi, GEO in Islamabad, by the armed groups and police respectively. Professional hazzards at the hands of law enforcement agencies become order of the day, and Union receieved complaints from different parts of the country, during which security officials either seized cameras or removed films. PFUJ also blamed the pressure groups for threatening journalists in different parts of the country. While journalists working in the tribal areas in NWFP regularly complaints about threats from militants, journalist Riaz Mengal was abducted on the orders of an influential Sardar. In Karachi, an ethnic group MRC, issued a "list of journalists," whom they considered chavanists. Few days later, bullets in envlop were found in cars of three journalists. "These threats made job most difficult for journalists with general elections round the corner," PFUJ observed.
ANTI-MEDIA LAWS AND CLOSURE OF CHANNELS :
Pakistan's mainstream private tv news channels remained under pressure throughout the year. Even before the closure of around 45 tv channels, mainly news channels on November 3, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), which suppopsed to regulate things infact turned into a "police force." The three mainstream news channels GEO, ARY and Aaj, become the prime target but even regional news channels like KTN, SINDH TV, KHYBER were not spared. Channels were forced not to telecast programmes on Baluchistan operation, kept news not favourable to government in low key. Several channels informed PFUJ that at least on 11 occassions their channels were put off air through cable operators. After an illegal action on Nov 3, when all tv channels went off air government allowed all channels and two main FM radio, Power-99 and Mast-103, after most of them were compelled to sign an undertaking and the so called code of conduct, but even they are not free to report according to "editorial decisions." They can not take free decisions about their "talk shows." GEO and all their other channels, Jang group become the worst target as they are reportedly been told to "sack," at least three anchors from GEO, and two reporters from The NEWS. "The struggle is on and will continue till the repeal of anti-media laws and for the cause of freedom of the Press in the country," PFUJ said.
Mazhar Abbas, Secretary General, PFUJ, 25 December 2007
***21.12.2007. PEC supports News Groups Appeal to UN Security Council on Safety of Journalists
Brussels, 18 December - The International News Safety Institute, the International Federation of Journalists and the European Broadcasting Union on Tuesday appealed to the President of the UN Security Council to help persuade states to respect "in letter and spirit" a key Security Council resolution on the safety of journalists on its first anniversary. In an open letter, the three organisations noted that in the year since the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1738 on the safety of journalists in conflict more news media personnel had died trying to cover the story than ever before. INSI counts at least 173 dead -- the worst yearly death toll ever -- since passage of 1738, which expressed deep concern "at the frequency of acts of violence, including deliberate attacks ... against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel." The Security Council condemned such attacks and called on all parties to put an end to such practices and end impunity for the killers. INSI, the IFJ and the EBU had campaigned for two years to get the resolution before the Security Council. It went through on 23 December, 2006. The three organisations said in their letter to Ambassador Marcello Spatafora of Italy, current President of the Security Council : "We strongly believe that the rising death toll could be arrested effectively if States where journalists are killed were to apply their existing laws vigorously whenever a journalist is murdered." After a two-year inquiry into journalist deaths around the world, INSI reported 1,000 fatalities between 1996 and 2006 and revealed that in fewer than two out of 10 cases of murder was anyone brought to justice. "We appeal to you, Sir, to urge your colleagues on the Security Council to respect the letter and the spirit of Resolution 1738 so that we can begin to bring down the shocking level of casualties suffered by the news media on behalf of free societies everywhere," the letter said. It noted that the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which enshrines freedom of expression, will be celebrated around the world next year. "It should be remembered that journalists act on behalf of us all. They are our eyes and our ears, the means by which, in the words of Article 19 of the Declaration, we 'seek, receive and impart information and ideas'," the letter said. "There can be no freedom of expression where journalists are murdered for doing their job," it stated. The IFJ is the world's largest organisation of journalists, representing around 500,000 members in more than 100 countries. The European Broadcasting Union is the world's biggest association of national broadcasters, with 75 active members in 56 countries. Its member broadcasters reach an audience of 650 million weekly. Both organisations are members of INSI, an NGO committed to the safety of journalists and other news media personnel working in dangerous conditions around the world. Details of journalist casualties and of Resolution 1738 can be obtained from the INSI website www.newssafety.com
The text of the letter:
18 December 2007
H.E. Mr. Marcello Spatafora Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative Permanent Mission of Italy to the United Nations
Your Excellency,
We should like to draw your attention, as President of the Security Council, to the forthcoming first anniversary on 23 December, 2007, of Resolution 1738 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict.
The Resolution expresses deep concern "at the frequency of acts of violence, including deliberate attacks, in many parts of the world against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel". The Security Council "condemned such attacks and called on all parties to put an end to such practices".
The Resolution was widely welcomed by journalist support groups around the world, including our three organisations, which had presented a draft to the then Secretary-General Kofi Annan at the World Electronic Media Forum (WEMF2) in Tunisia in 2005 -- the International News Safety Institute (INSI), an NGO devoted to the safety of journalists and other news professionals, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), the world's largest organisation of journalists, and the European Broadcasting Union (EBU).
Yet since the Resolution was passed at least 170 more news media staff have died trying to cover the news in 35 countries, in wars and in peacetime. This is a record for any single year. Conflict continues to exact a high toll. More than 80 journalists and support staff have been killed in countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sri Lanka and DR Congo.
In the most comprehensive exercise of its kind, INSI spent two years conducting a global inquiry into news media deaths over a 10-year period. It counted more than 1,000 personnel who had died trying to cover the news between 1996 and 2006. Two-thirds were murdered, most of them in their own countries in peacetime, and in almost nine out of 10 of these cases no one was brought to justice. Hence the emphasis in Resolution 1738 for States to end impunity for the killers of journalists.
We strongly believe that the rising death toll could be arrested effectively if States where journalists are killed were to apply their existing laws vigorously whenever a journalist is murdered.
We appeal to you, Sir, to urge your colleagues on the Security Council to respect the letter and the spirit of Resolution 1738 so that we can begin to bring down the shocking level of casualties suffered by the news media on behalf of free societies everywhere. In this regard, we would like to draw your attention to the recommendations on journalist safety made to the UN Secretary-General and member States by WEMF3 in Malaysia on 11 December.
It is also worth recalling that 2008 is the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which declares freedom of expression a fundamental right.
It should be remembered that journalists act on behalf of us all. They are our eyes and our ears, the means by which, in the words of Article 19 of the Declaration, we "seek, receive and impart information and ideas".
There can be no freedom of expression where journalists are murdered for doing their job.
Sincerely, Rodney Pinder Director, INSI Jean Reveillon Secretary General, EBU Aidan White General Secretary, IFJ
***18.12.2007. CPJ report: Journalist Deaths Hit Decade Peak.
Journalists were killed in unusually high numbers in 2007, making it the deadliest year for the press in more than a decade, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists’ end-of-year analysis. Worldwide, CPJ found 64 journalists were killed in direct connection to their work in 2007—up from 56 last year—and it is investigating another 22 deaths to determine whether they were work-related. CPJ has recorded only one year with a higher death toll: 1994, when 66 journalists were killed, many in conflicts in Algeria, Bosnia, and Rwanda.
For the fifth straight year, Iraq was the deadliest country in the world for the press. Its 31 victims account for nearly half of the 2007 toll. Most of the victims were targeted and murdered, such as Washington Post reporter Salih Saif Aldin, who died in Baghdad from a single gunshot wound to the head. In all, 24 deaths in Iraq were murders and seven occurred in combat-related crossfire.
Unidentified gunmen, suicide bombers, and U.S. military activity all posed fatal risks for Iraqi journalists. All but one of 31 journalists killed were Iraqi nationals. They worked mainly for local media, although nine worked for international news organizations such as The New York Times, ABC News, Reuters, and The Associated Press. The 2007 toll in Iraq is consistent with that of 2006, when 32 journalists died.
“Working as a journalist in Iraq remains one of the most dangerous jobs on the planet,” said CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon. “Members of the press are being hunted down and murdered with alarming regularity. They are abducted at gunpoint and found dead later or shot dead on the spot. Those who die are nearly always Iraqi and many work for international news agencies. These journalists gave their lives so that all of us could be informed about what is happening in Iraq.”
Twelve media support workers, such as bodyguards and drivers, also died in Iraq. Since the beginning of the war in March 2003, 124 journalists and 49 media workers have been killed, making it the deadliest conflict for the press in recent history. More than one-third worked for international news organizations.
Somalia was the second-deadliest country for the media in 2007, with seven journalist deaths. “Horrific violence in Iraq overshadowed the increasingly deteriorating environment for the media in Somalia,” said Simon. “Journalists reporting in Somalia face great risks every day.”
Included in the seven deaths in Somalia are the back-to-back assassinations of two prominent journalists. Mahad Ahmed Elmi, director of Capital Voice radio in Mogadishu, died after being shot four times in the head. Hours later, a remotely detonated landmine took the life of HornAfrik Media co-owner Ali Iman Sharmarke as he left Elmi’s funeral.
Deaths spiked in Africa overall, from two in 2006 to 10 this year. Two journalists died in Eritrea and one in Zimbabwe in 2007.
Beneath the terrible numbers, CPJ documented some positive developments: There were no murders of journalists in Colombia this year for the first time in more than 15 years. For the first time since 1999, there were no work-related deaths of Philippine journalists.
Murder is the leading cause of work-related deaths for journalists worldwide. Consistent with previous years, about seven in 10 journalist deaths in 2007 were murders. (Combat-related deaths and deaths in dangerous assignments account for the rest.) CPJ announced a global campaign against impunity in November to seek justice in journalist murders. The campaign focuses on the Philippines and Russia, two of the deadliest countries for the press over the past 15 years.
Despite recent convictions in both countries, the impunity rate in each remains at about 90 percent. “Unsolved killings spread fear and self-censorship, crippling the work of the media,” said Simon. “We need to break the cycle by bringing the killers of journalists to justice.”
In every region of the world, journalists who produced critical reporting or covered sensitive stories were silenced. In both Pakistan and Sri Lanka, five journalists were killed for their work. Suicide bombers caused three of the five deaths in Pakistan, including the death of Muhammad Arif of ARY One World TV, who was among the 139 people killed when bombs exploded during the homecoming of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. In Sri Lanka, air force fighter jets bombed the Voice of Tigers radio station, killing three employees. One slaying occurred in the United States, where a masked gunman shot Oakland Post Editor-in-Chief Chauncey Bailey as he walked to work. Police moved quickly to apprehend the suspected gunman.
Millions of people around the globe watched the apparently deliberate murder of Japanese photographer Kenji Nagai by Burmese troops during the crackdown on antigovernment demonstrators in Rangoon. No apparent moves have been made to bring his killer to justice.
The assassination of Turkish-Armenian editor Hrant Dink outside his newspaper office in Istanbul sent shock waves through the Turkish press and the international community. In Kyrgyzstan, ethnic Uzbek independent journalist Alisher Saipov was shot and killed at close range, and in Peru, popular radio commentator Miguel Pérez Julca was gunned down in front of his family.
Nepal, the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Haiti, Honduras, and Russia also made the list of places with journalist fatalities this year. Five journalists are classified as missing, three of them in Mexico.
Media support workers are increasingly at risk, CPJ research shows. For the first time, CPJ has compiled a list of media worker deaths. Worldwide, 20 translators, fixers, guards, and drivers were killed in 2007. The victims include three Mexican newspaper delivery workers slain by drug traffickers seeking to silence their employer.
CPJ, founded in 1981, compiles and analyzes journalist deaths each year. CPJ staff applies strict criteria for each entry on the annual killed list; researchers independently investigate and verify the circumstances behind each death. CPJ considers a case work-related only when its staff is reasonably certain that a journalist was killed in direct reprisal for his or her work; in crossfire; or while carrying out a dangerous assignment.
If the motives in a killing are unclear, but it is possible that a journalist died in direct relation to his or her work, CPJ classifies the case as “unconfirmed” and continues to investigate. CPJ’s list does not include journalists who died from illness or were killed in accidents—such as car or plane crashes—unless the crash was caused by hostile action. Other press organizations using different criteria cite higher numbers of deaths than CPJ.
***17.12.2007. French Journalist kidnapped in Somalia, Somali Journalists denounce
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is strongly condemning the kidnapping of French journalist Gwen Le Gouil on Sunday, 16 December, by unknown gunmen in Port town of Bossasso, the capital of Bari region in north-eastern area of Somalia.
According to journalists and news reports, Gwen Le Gouil, who is cameraman that arrived Bossasso on Saturday, 15 December, from Mogadishu, was kidnapped by five armed men who ordered his driver and translator to go away. He is reportedly being held in a place called Marero, which is 7 km east of Bossasso. This evening, Puntland authorities failed to release him after the kidnapers opened fire to Puntland officials who went there to negotiate with kidnapers, according to officials.
The reason behind the kidnapping of Gwen Le Gouil, who wanted to cover human trafficking to Saudi Arabia via Yemen from Bossasso, is not officially known, although kidnapers reportedly demanded a ransom of at least US$70,000.
The media outlet that Gwen Le Gouil is working with is not formally known, but unconfirmed reports are stating that he is freelancing with ARTE Television, a French & German Television based in Strasbourg with an office in Paris.
"We denounce this kidnapping of Gwen Le Gouil, and we demand his immediate and unconditional release" said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. "We appeal to Puntland authorities to make peaceful release of the French cameraman and not to use any force that can risk the life of Gwen Le Gouil".
***16.12.2007. Press Freedom in Peril Warns IFJ as Russia Expels Investigative Reporter The International Federation of Journalists protested today over the expulsion of a Moscow-based investigative reporter with a warning that official intolerance of independent journalism is squeezing the life out of press freedom in Russia.
Natalia Morar, a journalist for the monthly independent news magazine New Time was detained at the city's Domodedovo airport on her return from an unrelated press trip to Israel with a group of journalists. She was barred from entry to Moscow where she has lived for a number of years and, without further explanation, was put on a flight to Moldova where she was born.
The action is thought to be official retaliation for her expose of the shady transfer of money to political parties, including United Russia, the party of President Vladimir Putin, during the recent parliamentary elections.
"This action is a shocking violation of press freedom and is clearly a warning to others not to try to expose the dark side of politics in modern Russia," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary, who was in Moscow for a ceremony to honour journalists who have died in the line of duty. "When a journalists is victimised like this, without any opportunity to defend themselves, then press freedom is in danger of being extinguished altogether."
The IFJ is calling on the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the Council of Europe to investigate the case and to demand an explanation from the Russian authorities.
The President of the Russian Union of Journalists, Vsevelod Bogdonov, joined the condemnation and said the union would protest strongly over the incident. Bogdanov serves on the IFJ's international Executive Committee.
According to her editor Morar was stopped by customs officials after clearing passport controls and was told that on the orders of the FSB, the Russian security service, she was being denied entry to the country where she has lived both as a student and a working journalists over the past few years.
Her magazine New Time is the most vigorous of the small number of independent media that follow economic and political developments in Russia.
"The message being sent to all journalists could not be clearer," said White. "It is keep your noses out of sensitive Kremlin and political affairs or face retribution. This case should set alarm bells ringing anew over the perilous state of media freedom and pluralism in Russia."
**10.12.2007. Résolutions des 39e assises de l'Union internationale de la presse francophone (UPF), réunie du 2 au 7 décembre à Abidjan et à Yamoussoukro (Côte d'Ivoire). L'UPF
- Adresse ses plus vifs remerciements à la Côte d'Ivoire, à son président Laurent Gbagbo, son premier ministre Guillaume Soro, son ministre de la communication Ibrahim Sy Savané, son ministre de la culture et de la francophonie Augustin Kouadio Komoe ainsi qu'à toutes ses équipes et en particulier le comité d'organisation qui ont contribué au succès de ces 39èmes assises.
- Réaffirme que le respect des droits fondamentaux de l'homme et du citoyen et en particulier la liberté d'expression sont étroitement liées à l'existence d'entreprises de presse pérennes et de journalistes travaillant en toute indépendance.
- Demande en conséquence aux États d'assurer aux entreprises de presse et aux journalistes des cadres statutaires et un environnement démocratique, juridique, économique, fiscal et technique favorable et adapté aux nouvelles évolutions du marché et du droit international relatif aux médias et en particulier aux réseaux internet.
- Demande aux autorités politiques et juridiques du Niger de procéder à la libération de deux journalistes, le correspondant de RFI Moussa Kaka, et le directeur d'Aïr Infos Ibrahim Manzo Diallo, emprisonnés pour avoir rencontré des opposants touaregs en rébellion armée.
- Demande également aux autorités de la Serbie d'intensifier les efforts de ses services de police en vue d'identifier et de retrouver les assassins de trois journalistes, Dada Vujanovic, Slavko Curuvija et Milan Pantic, tués entre 1994 et 2001 en ex-Yougoslavie.
- Apporte son appui au projet présenté par la délégation suisse de mettre en place une convention internationale de protection des journalistes dans les pays en guerre ou en conflit.
- Renouvelle son soutien à TV5, l'un des principaux outils au service de la francophonie et souhaite que ce lien entre les peuples ayant le français en partage soit conforté notamment en Afrique où elle est particulièrement indispensable. Par son statut multilatéral, TV5 doit poursuivre son action au service de la diversité culturelle et de la paix.
- S'associe aux actions entreprises par le Comité international olympique (CIO) en faveur de " la paix par le sport " et de la défense des droits de l'homme à dix mois des jeux Olympiques de Pékin.
Yamoussoukro, vendredi 7 décembre 2007.
***10.12.2007.RD CONGO / KINSHASA Célébration de la journée des Droits de l’Homme: JED dénonce la « mort programmée » des médias proches de l’opposition
A l’occasion de la célébration, lundi 10 décembre 2007, du 59 ème anniversaire de la Déclaration Universelle des Droits de l’Homme, Journaliste en danger (JED), organisation indépendante de défense et de promotion de la liberté de la presse basée à Kinshasa en République Démocratique du Congo, a lancé un nouvel appel à la réouverture d’une trentaine de chaînes de radios et Télévisions interdites à Kinshasa depuis près de deux mois. « Le Gouvernement ne fait rien pour décanter cette situation grave ; et le Parlement regarde ailleurs face au calvaire des hommes et des femmes de ces médias contraints au chômage et livrés à la mendicité », a dit le Secrétaire Général de JED, Tshivis Tshivuadi, lors d’une conférence de presse de présentation d’un rapport sur l’état de la liberté de la presse en République Démocratique du Congo, une année après les élections et l’installation des nouvelles institutions dites démocratiques.
Dans son rapport, JED constate une augmentation sensible de 30% des actes de violence contre les médias et contre les journalistes dont deux ont été assassinés à l’Est du pays au cours de l’année 2007. JED note également que 90% des cas de menaces, d’attaques ou de violences contre les journalistes et les médias sont les faits des éléments des forces armées, de la police ou des services de sécurité. « La situation générale de la presse et des médias est préoccupante, non seulement en raison de la précarité des organes de presse contraints de jouer aux caisses de résonnance des thèses officielles pour continuer à survivre, mais aussi à cause de la mort programmée de quelques médias qui dérangent et qui d’ores et déjà ont été réduits au silence », a encore dit le Secrétaire Général de JED, avant d’appeler à des reformes urgentes du cadre juridique de l’exercice de la liberté de la presse, et à la mise sur pied d’un Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel et de la Communication (organe de régulation) véritablement indépendante du Ministère de la communication et des médias.
Pour rappel, de 38 entreprises audiovisuelles émettant à Kinshasa, dont 22 chaînes de télévision et 16 stations de radio sont fermées depuis le 20 octobre 2007 sur une décision de l’ancien ministre de l’Information Toussaint TSHILOMBO SEND. Le ministre a justifié sa décision en évoquant, d’une part, le souci d’assainissement de l’espace médiatique exprimé par le gouvernement, au lendemain des affrontements sanglants du mois de mars 2007, à Kinshasa, entre la garde du président de la république, Joseph Kabila, et celle de l’opposant Jean-Pierre BEMBA. Plus concrètement, le ministre a évoqué l’absence, dans les dossiers respectifs de ces entreprises, de la licence d’exploitation, du récépissé (délivré par son ministère) et des preuves de paiement des taxes administratives auxquelles sont assujetties ces organes de presse. Mais, dès le lendemain de cette mesure controversée, la plupart des chaînes incriminées ont dénoncé une décision arbitraire en brandissant les documents et preuves qu’on leur réclamait. D’autres qui avaient des dossiers incomplets ont régularisé, depuis, leurs situations administratives ou fiscales, mais leur signal d’émission reste coupé.
***07.12.2007. HUMAN RIGHTS EXPERT CONCERNED ABOUT THREATS TO MEDIA IN SOMALIA Geneva, 7 December 2007
The Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia, Ghanim Alnajjar, issued the following statement today:
“I am very concerned about recent reports that “Somaliland” authorities have ordered twenty-four journalists to leave “Somaliland” within the next few days.” The journalists reportedly fled Mogadishu earlier this year, in response to threats and intimidation and sought refuge in a safe house in Hargeisa with the approval of the authorities. Some of the journalists have reportedly continued to exercise their freedom of expression while in Hargeisa.
“The media must be allowed to perform its duties without apprehension and I call upon the “Somaliland” authorities to reconsider their decision to order the expulsion of the journalists,” Mr. Alnajjar said.
The year 2007 has been a very dangerous and difficult one for Somali journalists and human rights defenders, especially in Mogadishu. Since January, eight media professionals have been killed and dozens more threatened into silence for their work, while many have fled in fear. Several media organisations have also been closed by authorities or have been intimidated into restricting their own reporting on current events.
Mr. Alnajjar continued that “Threats to journalists and media outlets constitute serious violations of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I condemn such acts and call for investigations into all threats, attacks and killings against the media and the prompt re-opening of the closed media organisations. I also take this opportunity to remind all Somali authorities of their obligation to respect the right to freedom of opinion and expression, and to ensure the safety and security of all, including journalists and other media professionals, human rights defenders and humanitarian workers.”
***06.12.2007.CPJ: One in 6 jailed journalists are held without charge Census shows an overall decline; China remains the leading jailer
New York, December 5, 2007—One in six journalists jailed worldwide are being held without any publicly disclosed charge, many for months or years at a time and some in secret locations, the Committee to Protect Journalists has found in a new analysis.
CPJ’s annual worldwide census of imprisoned journalists found 127 behind bars on December 1, a decrease of seven from the 2006 tally. The drop is due in large part to the release this year of 15 Ethiopian journalists who were either acquitted or pardoned of antistate charges stemming from a broad government crackdown on the press. CPJ and others had waged an intensive advocacy campaign on their behalf.
China, which has failed to meet its promises to improve press freedom before the 2008 Olympics, continued to be the world’s leading jailer of journalists, a dishonor it has held for nine consecutive years. Cuba, Eritrea, Iran, and Azerbaijan round out the top five jailers among the 24 nations that imprison journalists.
Antistate allegations such as subversion, divulging state secrets, and acting against national interests remain the most common charge used to imprison journalists worldwide, CPJ found. About 57 percent of journalists in the census are jailed under these charges, many of them by the Chinese and Cuban governments.
The proportion of journalists held without any charge at all increased for the third consecutive year. Eritrea and Iran account for many of these cases, but the United States has used this tactic as well. U.S. authorities have not filed charges or presented evidence against Al-Jazeera cameraman Sami al-Haj, held for more than five years at Guantánamo Bay, or Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein, held in Iraq for more than 19 months. The U.S. military said in November that Hussein’s case would be referred to Iraqi courts for prosecution but continued to withhold details explaining the basis for the detention.
“Imprisoning journalists on the basis of assertions alone should not be confused with a legal process. This is nothing less than state-sponsored abduction,” CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon said. “While we believe every one of these 127 journalists should be released, we are especially concerned for those detained without charge because they’re often held in abysmal conditions, cut off from their lawyers and their families.”
The practice of holding journalists without charge has eroded basic standards of fairness and accountability. Iranian authorities, for example, jailed Mohammad Seddigh Kaboudvand in July, but they have yet to file formal charges or bring the editor before a judge. Kaboudvand’s lawyer has not been allowed to see him or review the government’s case. Eritrean authorities will not even confirm whether the journalists in its custody are alive or dead. At least 19 journalists worldwide are being held in secret locations, CPJ found, with Eritrea the worst offender in this regard.
Continuing a decade-long trend, Internet journalists make up an increasing proportion of CPJ’s census. Bloggers, online editors, and Web-based reporters constitute about 39 percent of journalists jailed worldwide. Print journalists make up the largest professional category, accounting for about half of those in jail.
The rise of Internet journalism and its risks are evident in China, where 18 of the 29 jailed journalists worked online. China’s list includes Shi Tao, an award-winning journalist serving a 10-year sentence for e-mailing details of a government propaganda directive to an overseas Web site. The Internet giant Yahoo supplied account information to Chinese authorities that led to Shi’s 2004 arrest and triggered an ongoing debate over corporate responsibility.
China continues to rely heavily on the use of vague antistate charges, imprisoning 22 journalists on accusations such as “inciting subversion of state power.” Despite China’s 2001 promises to the International Olympic Committee that it would ensure “complete media freedom,” its leaders continue to jail reporters and operate a vast system of censorship, CPJ found in a special report in August. CPJ has urged the IOC and the Games’ corporate sponsors to hold Beijing accountable to its word.
“China has remained the world’s worst jailer of journalists from the day the Games were awarded through today, just months before the Olympics are scheduled to begin,” said CPJ’s Simon. “China and the IOC have an obligation to make good on the broad promises made when Beijing was selected. For the torch to be lit in Beijing next August as 29 journalists languish in jail would mock the ideals of the Olympic movement.”
Fidel Castro ’s absence from day-to-day power has not led to media reform in Cuba, the world’s second-leading jailer. Twenty-four Cuban journalists are imprisoned, CPJ found, most of them swept up in a March 2003 crackdown on the independent press. Eritrea ranks third, with 14 jailed journalists, all held in undisclosed prisons.
Two countries—Iran and Azerbaijan—are new to the list of leading jailers. Facing domestic dissent and economic troubles, Iranian authorities are meting out harsher penalties to journalists. Twelve are now in Iranian jails. One of them, Adnan Hassanpour, editor of the now-banned weekly Aso, was sentenced to death after being convicted in January of endangering national security and engaging in propaganda against the state.
Imprisonments also spiked in Azerbaijan, where nine journalists are currently in jail. The imprisoned ranks include editor Eynulla Fatullayev, whose April arrest came shortly after he published an in-depth report alleging an official cover-up in the 2005 slaying of fellow Azerbaijani editor Elmar Huseynov.
CPJ research shows that journalist imprisonments rose significantly after governments worldwide imposed sweeping national security laws in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. Imprisonments stood at 81 in 2000 but have since averaged 129 in CPJ’s annual surveys.
Here are other trends and details that emerged in CPJ’s analysis:
• In about 12 percent of cases, governments used a variety of charges unrelated to journalism to retaliate against critical writers, editors, and photojournalists. Such charges range from regulatory violations to drug possession. In the cases included in this census, CPJ has determined that the charges were most likely lodged in reprisal for the journalist’s work.
• Criminal defamation, the next most common charge, was lodged in about 7 percent of cases. Charges of ethnic or religious insult were filed in about 5 percent of cases, while violations of censorship rules account for another 2 percent.
• Print and Internet journalists make up the bulk of the census. Television journalists compose the next largest professional category, accounting for 6 percent of cases. Radio journalists account for 4 percent, documentary filmmakers 2 percent.
• The longest-serving journalists in CPJ’s census are Chen Renjie and Lin Youping, who were jailed in China in July 1983 for publishing a pamphlet titled Ziyou Bao (Freedom Report). Codefendant Chen Biling was later executed.
CPJ believes that journalists should not be imprisoned for doing their jobs. The organization has sent letters expressing its serious concerns to each country that has imprisoned a journalist. In addition, CPJ sent requests during the year to Eritrean and U.S. officials seeking details in cases in which journalists were held without publicly disclosed charges.
CPJ’s list is a snapshot of those incarcerated at midnight on December 1, 2007. It does not include the many journalists imprisoned and released throughout the year; accounts of those cases can be found at www.cpj.org. Journalists remain on CPJ’s list until the organization determines with reasonable certainty that they have been released or have died in custody.
Journalists who either disappear or are abducted by nonstate entities, including criminal gangs, rebels, or militant groups, are not included on the imprisoned list. Their cases are classified as “missing” or “abducted.” Details of these cases are also available on CPJ's Web site.
***04.12.2007. COVERING WAR AND DISASTER – REPORT ON SPECIAL MEETING ON MEDIA SAFETY AND IHL IN WAR REPORTING OF 26TH NOV. 2007 IN GENEVA
On 26th November 2007, over 100 representatives of States, Red Cross and Red Crescent organisations, media and media-related organisations gathered in Geneva to consider the relevance of the laws of war for media coverage of armed conflicts and to discuss measures for the improvement of media safety. The meeting was hosted by the ICRC and preceded the opening of the 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent.
OPENING - Why we called this Meeting
"The recent deterioration of the safety for media professionals in armed conflicts and in other situations of violence is highly alarming," Yves Daccord, ICRC Director of Communication and Chairman said in opening the meeting. "We felt compelled to address it within the context of the International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent. The Conference offers the opportunity to inform members of the international Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement as well as States party to the Geneva Convention about the situation and to call on them to take concrete action, each in their roles and capacities. We have invited media professionals and representatives of organisations working with the media to join the meeting to inspire us with their testimonies and ideas." He explained that the overall aim of the meeting was to give more clout to international humanitarian law, both as one of the means to give media reporting on war more relevance and force, as well as in the protection it provides for media professionals.
PART ONE - Does International Humanitarian Law make Good News?
"Why should journalists know the basics of the laws of war?" was the first question addressed by the meeting. "I think it is important (that journalists know the basics of IHL), so that we in the media can point out what the laws of war say, even as some governments are 'interpreting' them otherwise," Elaine Cobbe, a seasoned TV and radio reporter and media trainer argued. Understanding how to read events and situations from an IHL angle makes war coverage more accurate and compelling, others contended. When journalists know what is at stake and what questions must be raised, their stories can raise the accountability of the actors involved in an armed conflict, some added. Certain legal provisions impact directly on editorial decisions, such as the prohibition to expose prisoners of war or civilian internees to public curiosity by publishing inappropriate images, as Christopher Whomersley, Deputy Legal Advisor of the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office and others explained.
Taking Action
Red Cross and Red Crescent organizations were asked to share what expertise is available in their ranks with media professionals by the means of training session, discussions and information on IHL-related issues. A model pledge for Red Cross and Red Crescent societies was proposed to this effect, and seven national societies signed up to the pledge by the end of the 30th International Conference: the Syrian Red Crescent, the Tanzanian, British, Polish, Bulgarian, Belgian and Australian Red Crosses. The pledge reads as follows:
(The National Society pledges) to initiate discussions with practising journalists and editors on key provisions of IHL, current debates around IHL issue's and the application of IHL to situations and events with a view to promoting a better understanding among journalists and editors.
The ICRC announced that it is developing a digital tool for the instruction of media in the basics of IHL together with the Crimes of War Project for 2008.
PART TWO - How International Humanitarian Law Protects Media
Knut Dörmann, Deputy Head of the Legal Division of the ICRC, explained which specific protections IHL grants to journalists and their staff. As civilians they must not be directly attacked. Any intentional contravention against this prohibition would constitute a war crime. Journalists are also entitled to fundamental guarantees when they are held in the power of a party to a conflict. As a consequence the following acts are prohibited, at any time and in any place: violence to their life, health, or physical or mental well-being, in particular murder, torture, cruel or inhuman treatment; outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; hostage taking; and arbitrary deprivation of liberty. By considering journalists as civilians, States agreed to let them do their job, i.e. take photographs, shoot films, record information or take notes, without this constituting a reason for attacking them or depriving them of their rights as civilians. IHL rules thus offer an important safety net of protection to journalists and members of their crews. However, they are not sufficiently respected in practice. Therefore, the first objective must be to work for better compliance with these rules.
Indeed, the situation on the ground too often belies the rights of journalists to do their job without fearing to be attacked. "We have a duty to care", Lyse Doucet, an experienced BBC journalist, insisted, "in particular when it comes to our non-Western colleagues who are often much more exposed than us and more neglected". A strong emphasis was put by several participants on the need for equal and impartial consideration for all before the laws, as well as in practical terms, for example when it comes to training and equipping journalists.
Taking Action
The ICRC proposed that States party to the Geneva Conventions commit to taking measures towards a better enforcement of the laws that protect journalists who work in armed conflicts, particularly in combating impunity and in instructing security and armed forces in the rights of journalists who cover armed conflicts. The UK, France, the USA, Denmark, Switzerland and Germany agreed to take such a pledge. The pledge reads as follows (note that Germany and the UK changed the proposed text and their pledge can be viewed on www.icrc.org):
() To take all necessary steps to ensure that civilian journalists, media professionals and associated personnel working in armed conflicts enjoy the respect and protection granted to civilians under international humanitarian law for so long as they are entitled to such respect and protection.
() To promote international humanitarian law principles and rules applicable to journalists, media, professionals and associated personnel working in armed conflicts, through, inter alia, the provision of training to members of the armed and national security forces, both in peace and war times.
() To provide all members of the armed and national security forces with adequate information on the rights and professional principles of journalists, media professionals and associated personnel, including on the need to preserve their independence.
() To ensure that those responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel are prosecuted and brought before competent and impartial tribunals.
PART THREE - What Can the Red Cross Red Crescent Do to Make Media Safer?
Sarah De Jong, Deputy Director of the International News Safety Institute, spoke of the imperative need for journalists to prepare to cope with a wide range of risks. She made a particular call for the training in First Aid which was supported by other participants. No media professional ought to be allowed to leave the office without at least knowing how to deal with an accident or a health-related emergency, whether it be for his or her own safety or for those he or she might meet on assignment.
A few Red Cross and Red Crescent organisations have begun to organise First Aid training specifically tailored for media professionals. Corazon Alma De Leon, Secretary General of the Philippines Red Cross, convincingly argued the advantages such programmes present for both sides, while Dev Dhakhwa, Secretary General of the Nepal Red Cross suggested that many national societies will require support to sustain such programmes which can literally be vital to the media professionals who cover risky assignments. The Indonesian Red Cross also initiated First Aid training for media professionals (see their enclosed report).
Taking Action
Red Cross and Red Crescent societies who have an expertise in this domain were urged to consider the organisation of First Aid training for media professionals in their home countries. In order to ensure that such trainings would be offered without discrimination to journalists under contract and to freelancers, it was suggested that the Red Cross and Red Crescent societies work in coordination with national media associations or unions. A model pledge outlining this proposal was submitted to the participating national Red Cross and Red Crescent societies. The Danish and British Red Cross societies signed up to the pledge, while a few other societies already have more or less advanced plans to provide First Aid training to media staff (the Iranian Red Crescent, the French, Bulgarian, Philippines, Nepali, Indonesian, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kenyan and South African Red Crosses and the Israeli National Society). The pledge reads as follows:
(The National Society) pledges to open discussions with their national media organisations or associations with a view to setting up and running a programme for training their national media staff in first aid on a regular basis.
The ICRC's service for media professionals who find themselves in trouble in armed conflicts must be promoted with editors and the wider media community. This ICRC HOTLINE consists in a permanent point of contact (ICRC HOTLINE call number +41 79 217 32 85) through which employers and media-related organisations can alert the ICRC to the distress of media professionals. All ICRC offices can be approached for such requests. If the ICRC is operational in the area where a journalist faces difficulties, the ICRC may be able to offer help, as it does for other persons finding themselves in a similar situation. The services the ICRC can provide are of purely humanitarian nature.
CONCLUSION – THE WAY FORWARD
The Chairman called on States party to the Geneva Conventions to take concrete measures to reinforce the protection afforded to media professionals under IHL. He also appealed to the national Red Cross and Red Crescent societies to offer specific First Aid training for media professionals and/or to work with the media to increase their knowledge in IHL, if they had the expertise to do so. The ICRC was committed to providing technical and expert support in these two fields to interested National Societies. Furthermore, the ICRC would make sure that its HOTLINE service for media professionals on dangerous assignment be better known to journalists, editors and the families of media professionals. To conclude, the chairman thanked the participants for their interest and constructive inputs.
**29.11.2007. 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent - U.S. to Adopt Pledge to Protect Journalists in Conflict Zones (Consult also our page: PRESS) - Press release - U.S. Mission to the United Nations in Geneva
The U.S. Delegation to the 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in Geneva has announced that the United States will adopt a pledge to ensure the protection of journalists in conflict zones.
John Bellinger, Legal Advisor of the U.S. Department of State and head of the U.S. Delegation, said that "The United States is absolutely committed to protection of journalists in conflict zones. We recognize the dangers that they face. They are often embedded with our forces and we do everything we can both to support their journalistic work and to protect them."
Under the pledge, the United States will make efforts to ensure that civilian journalists are given the respect and protection granted them under international humanitarian law. The U.S. will continue the long tradition of training its armed forces in the application of international humanitarian law in regards to journalists, and will ensure that those responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law against journalists are prosecuted and brought before competent and impartial tribunals.
***28.11.2007. News Deaths Hit All-Time High (INSI)
At least 171 journalists and other news media staff have died as a result of their work around the world so far this year, making 2007 the bloodiest year on record for the industry. With more than a month still to go before the end of the year, the all-time high of 168 deaths recorded in 2006 was exceeded on Tuesday when at least three editorial staff were killed in Sri Lanka during a military air strike on a radio station. "This horrible statistic should be regarded as a low point in the safety and welfare of the media profession. We need better protection for media workers worldwide," said INSI Honorary President Chris Cramer. According to casualty records maintained by the International News Safety Institute the dead between 1 January and 28 November comprise 142 journalists and 29 support staff, such as drivers, translators and news technicians, in 35 countries. The great majority -- 121 -- were apparently murdered, targeted because of their jobs. Fifteen died in crossfire or other random attacks, 34 were killed in road or air accidents while the circumstances of one death were unclear. The most murderous country again was Iraq, where 64 died, taking the total news media toll since the start of the war to at least 235. Others were Sri Lanka (6 murders), Afghanistan, Mexico, India and Philippines (5 each) and Haiti, Pakistan and Somalia (4 each). Sri Lanka's position as a highly dangerous country for the news media was confirmed when the Air Force bombed the Voice of Tigers, the official radio station of the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in the northern province of Vanni. Nine people were killed, including at least three Editorial staff, according to reliable reports. All were reported to be civilians. Journalists are protected as civilians in a war zone and the deliberate targeting of civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities is a war crime under the Geneva Conventions. The United States ranked second after Iraq in the total number of journalists who have died this year trying to cover the news, but all but one of the casualties were as a result of an air or road accident. Four died when two news helicopters collided while trying to cover a police car chase in Phoenix last July. Nigeria also has a questionable overall safety record with six dead in a single accident last May. "The news media death toll around the world has risen almost every year since the millennium -- each year worse than the one before," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "This is despite international calls for an end to the murder of journalists and other news professionals and an end to impunity for their killers. It is far beyond time for nations and the international community to back up these calls with action. "Far too many news media also die in road or air accidents. It is time for many news organisations to take more seriously their duty of care, for staff and freelancers alike. Proper training and observance of good safety practice often can avoid needless deaths," he added. Analysis of casualty data by INSI shows at least 1,200 news media staff died covering the news around the world between 1996 and mid-2007. Two-thirds were murdered and in nine out of 10 cases no one was brought to justice. Following two years of campaigning by INSI, the International Federation of Journalists and the European Broadcasting Union, the UN Security Council last December unanimously passed Resolution 1738 on the protection of journalists in conflict zones and on the need to end impunity for their killers. The Council of Europe passed Resolution 1535 in January of this year on the safety of journalists in peacetime as well as war. "We call on governments everywhere to respect these resolutions in the letter and the spirit and take determined, effective action to stem the bloodshed," Pinder said. Details of all fatal incidents recorded by INSI in 2007 and previous years can be obtained from http://www.newssafety.com/casualties/2007.htm The International News Safety Institute is a unique coalition of news organisations, journalist support groups and individuals exclusively dedicated to the safety of news media staff working in dangerous environments. It is a non-profit charity, supported by membership contributions which are channelled back into safety work. As a safety organisation, INSI records all causes of death, whether deliberate, accidental or health-related, of all news media staff and freelancers while on a news assignment or as a result of a news organisation being attacked because of its work. (NB: The PEC Media ticking clock has not the same death toll than INSI, because it does not record accidental or health-related deaths and only journalists' deaths)
***24.11.2007. Iran: PEC supports petition to call for immediate release of Adnan Hassanpour
Adnan Hassanpour, 25, was sentenced to death by a revolutionary court in Marivan, Iranian Kurdistan, on 16 July 2007 after he was found guilty of “subversive activities against national security, “espionage” and “separatist propaganda”. His death sentence was confirmed by the Tehran Supreme Court on 22 November.
Adnan Hassanpour, who is a fervent activist for Kurdish cultural rights, was arrested outside his home on 25 January 2007, and imprisoned in Mahabad jail, where he has been denied the right to receive visits from his family or his lawyer.
The journalist has already twice been on hunger strike in prison in protest at the harsh conditions.
He worked for the weekly Asou, until it was banned by the ministry of culture and Islamic orientation in August 2005. He wrote for it about the Kurdish issue, a highly-sensitive subject in Iran. He also contributed to foreign media, including Voice of America and Radio Farda, broadcasting to Iran in Persian.
Nearly 300 people have been executed in Iran since the start of the year, according to several non-governmental human rights organisations. To sign the petition, go to: www.rsf.org
**15.11.2007. Media in Dire Crisis, NUSOJ Expresses Grave Concerns for Press Freedom and Safety of Journalists
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) expresses its deep concern over the increasing dangers confronted by Somali journalists and the arising clampdown on the operations of electronic media in Mogadishu.
The closedown of three well-known privately owned radio stations of Shabelle, Simba and Banadir by the security forces of the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia (TFG) brings out undoubtedly a rising trend of intolerance for press freedom in Somalia by officials in the TFG. Shabelle Radio was closed on Monday, 12 November, while Simba Radio and Banadir Radio were forced to cease operations in the next day, Tuesday, 13 November.
Today, 15 November 2007, three plain-clothes officers of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in a demo held at Banadir Football Stadium in north Mogadishu by the Administration of Banadir Region arrested Freelance Photojournalist Salah Mohammed Adde. When arrested, Salah was taking pictures from the demonstrators who were supporting the security operations carried out by the TFG forces with the backing of Ethiopian troops.
"Journalism in Mogadishu is at serious point, and the media professionals are facing extreme dangers on a daily basis," said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. "We need the fast and unconditional release of our colleague Salah Mohammed Adde".
The motive behind the arrest of the journalist is unknown, and Salah is held tonight in the headquarters of CID. "Salah did nothing wrong or suspicious, but such arrest depends on how the officer (security person) sees you" a comrade of Salah, who was standing with him when arrested, said anonymously because of his security.
The National Union of Somali Journalists has learned that Mogadishu journalists, particularly reporters & freelancers, are the most vulnerable people in the media. Many of them are now forced to leave from their profession because of open threats and intimidations they and their families confront.
"We are alarmed by the recent announcement of the Mayor of Mogadishu who ordered the electronic media to register" Omar said. "The media community is in state of confusion of whom should it register, under what conditions and the legality of that registration while draft media law is held back from putting before the parliament".
"We feel that absence of libertarian law regulating the media and dangerous attacks on the press, such public statement from the Mayor can be taken as a serious act to curtail media to operate freely and fearlessly" he said.
According to the records of the National Union of Somali Journalists, eight media people were killed so far this year, while 47 journalists and media assistants were jailed for different periods because of their media work. No crime against journalist was investigated and prosecuted, apart from the recent arrested of the killer of late journalist Abdulkadir Mahad Moallim Kaskey by clannish militias in Baidoa.
"Most distressful thing is the impunity that is given to those that attack, threaten and kill journalists," Omar said. "Yet in spite of this culture of exemption from punishment from crooks, media professionals themselves are being arrested and subjected to cruel treatments".
In the snowballing armed conflict, belligerent groups accustomed to describe journalists as chauvinists and prevaricators to vindicate their crimes against media professionals, NUSOJ said.
NUSOJ pleads to President Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed to build trust by taking immediate and imperative actions of ending ongoing press freedom violations, guarantying publicly personal safety of journalists, becoming supportive ally of Somali media and leading actions from his government to investigate and bring to justice those that attack journalists and media.
NUSOJ backs the refusals from the closed media houses to accept calls from the Mogadishu Mayor to admit that they made mistakes, if news media organizations want to resume operations.
***24.10.2007. SPECIAL BURMA (follow-up). Pulling the plug on the Internet in Burma - Christopher Smith, Mizzima News (www.mizzima.com)
October 24, 2007 - A new report chronicles the rare step, of completely turning off the Internet, taken by the Burmese regime to try and stem the flow of information leaving the country during the recent upheavals – and points to a possible increase in government surveillance measures as a result of the success enjoyed by Burmese netizens at the height of the crisis.
According to "Pulling the Plug: A Technical Review of the Internet Shutdown in Burma," put out by the OpenNet Initiative (ONI) and posted on Monday, the junta became only the second government to ever completely turn the Internet off; the other occurrence coming in Nepal in 2005.
The report states that the regime was consistent with other authoritarian states, in attempting to stem the technological flow of information, in that the junta also sought to minimize the potential for social mobilization during political events, this despite the minimal portion of the Burmese population that is believed to have Internet access.
"[I]t is quite remarkable how a small group of netizens, operating in a country where Internet penetration is less that one percent, achieved a disproportionate impact on how the crisis in Burma was understood or received by the outside world," says Stephanie Wang, a research fellow with the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School and chief architect of the ONI report.
However, the case of Burma is described as unique in its "apparent goal of also preventing information from reaching a wider international audience."
In fact, according to the report, the extreme measure of the regime in "pulling the plug" on the Internet is directly attributable to the evidence that was sent out to an international audience, especially pictorial, of the violence perpetrated by the military during the course of the crackdown; the first shots being fired around noon on September 26th. The report maintains that during the early days of the violent crackdown there were still some 200 Internet cafes functioning in the Rangoon area.
The impact of the information, visual and otherwise, emanating from Burma to an international audience could not only be seen in the protests and outcries from peoples and nations around the world, but Wang asserts also facilitated the spread of information throughout Burma.
"[N]etizens feeding information to overseas bloggers and news outlets such as Mizzima News had an impact by virtue of the fact that at least some of the information they provided was being circulated back into Burma through means other than the Internet," Wang told Mizzima.
The report identifies a two-week period, from the evening of September 29th to the afternoon of October 13th, during which the Internet was either completely or largely turned off.
In the days following the crackdown, officials from BaganNet, one of Burma's two Internet Service Providers (ISPs) along with Myanmar Posts and Telecom (MPT), were summoned to Naypyidaw for consultation.
BaganNet, now known as Myanmar Teleport is said to service most individual users, while MPT is government operated and rumored to be coming under the control of the Ministry of Defense. The ONI report notes that MPT has "peering" capabilities over the BaganNet ISP. It is unknown at this time what was discussed between BaganNet executives and the government in Naypyidaw.
With traditional media tightly controlled, the report states that prior to the severance of Internet access the ability to utilize the Internet allowed Burmese citizens a rare degree of freedom.
This being the case, the government is described as being "ill-prepared" for the flood of outgoing information resulting from the protests and government response, as its focus before the recent uprising was on the prevention of incoming information.
However ONI cautions that the regime is already taking steps toward assuring that the same window of freedom does not replicate itself in any future scenario.
These steps are said to include the slowing of any already tortoise-like Internet connection to 256 Kbps, in an attempt to mitigate the capacity of users to upload photos and videos; while other measures listed by the authors entail a further limitation to access, increased filtering of sites such as those belonging to international news agencies, intimidation and harassment.
Yet, at the time of writing, many Internet users in Burma are again able bypass the regime's technological barricades, as access to formally banned sites and online services remains a popular pastime for Burma's cyber community and a vital means of interacting and interfacing with a wider audience, both at home and abroad.
***19.10.2007. SOMALIA: Media Executive of Prominent Radio Station Assassinated in Mogadishu
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is deeply shocked by the Assassination of Media Executive of Prominent and Popular Radio station in Mogadishu.
Bashir Nor Gedi, Acting Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson of Shabelle Media Network was this evening, 19 October 2007, assassinated at his home in Wardhigley district of Hamarjadid neighborhood by unknown gunmen, according to his wife and his relatives.
The leadership of Shabelle Media Network confirmed the assassination of Bashir Nor Gedi. The Chairperson of Shabelle Media network Abdimalik Yusuf condemned this hardhearted killing. After Shabelle Radio broadcasted the assassination of its boss, the Radio stopped airing its normal programs and started airing verses of Holy Quran for grief of the death, according to Shabelle management.
The assassination of Bashir Nor Gedi seems to be premeditated attack, according his family members and eyewitness. Bashir becomes the eighth media person killed in Somalia since January 2007.
"This is intentional killing that has political motives" said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. "It is totally intolerable and sends clear message to each media person that his or her life in risk because of his or her media activity". "We have been appealing to political groups to end killing of media people, but no group listens". "Now is the time the international community should take urgent actions instead of statements expressing their distress and condemnation".
Shabelle Media Network has been experiencing attacks on its journalists and its premises recently. Senior journalists of the Radio fled from Mogadishu.
Radio Garowe Closed, three of its Journalists Arrested - 19 October 2007
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) today condemns the closing of Radio Garowe in Puntland, northeastern Somalia, and the subsequent arrest of three of its journalists.
Heavily armed security forces of Puntland Regional State stormed the premises of Radio Garowe, and ordered the management to shutdown the radio around 17 hours local time, according to journalists in Garowe and Garoweonline.
The security forces also arrested three journalists of the radio whose names and titles are: Abdi Farah Jama Mire, Director of the Radio; Isse Abdullahi Mohammed, Editor of the Radio; and Mohammed Dahir Yusuf, a Producer.
The motive behind the closure is not known, but Puntland journalists told NUSOJ that it is all about news report of a member of National Security Agency of Somalia who escaped from the agency and afterwards spoke to the media by criticising the behaviour of security agency in Mogadishu, which Radio Garowe reported.
"We denounce this act of closing Radio Garowe in Puntland" said Omar Faruk Osman, NUSOJ Secretary General. "We call upon Puntland authorities to immediately and unconditionally release Radio Garowe journalists and allow the Radio to resume its operations fearlessly".
Ongoing Intimidations of Journalists in Mogadishu and Garowe - 20 October 2007
Abdi Farah Jama Mire, Director of Radio Garowe, Mohammed Dahir Yusuf , Producer of the Radio were released, but the Isse Abdullahi Mohammed, the Editor of the Radio is still detained. The three journalists were arrested by heavily armed Puntland security forces on Friday afternoon. The Radio station, which was also closed on Friday, 19 October, is still closed.
Abdirashid Abdulle Abikar, a photojournalist working with AFP news agency was briefly arrested on Friday morning by the security agents of the Transitional Federal Government. Following hours of questioning at the CID, he was released Friday afternoon. Abdirashid Abdulle Abikar, who is Secretary of Training of the National Union of Somali Journalists, was arrested whilst taking photos from wounded people at Madina hospital. His photographic camera and other equipment were confiscated. The reason of the arrest is unknown Abdullahi Mohammed Hassan "Black", Editor-in-Chief of Mogadishu based Ayamaaha Daily Newspaper, was arrested on Friday afternoon by forces from National Security Agency at the newspaper's office in Mogadishu. He was held overnight, and was released Saturday morning. The motive behind the arrest remains unidentified.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Office of the Spokesman - For Immediate Release October 22, 2007 - 2007/903
STATEMENT BY SEAN MCCORMACK, SPOKESMAN
"The United States condemns the murder of Bashir Nur Gedi, acting Chairman of Shabelle Media Network on Friday, October 19 in Mogadishu. We offer our sympathy and condolences to Gedi's family and colleagues.
Gedi's murder marks the eighth murder of a member of the Somalia media in 2007. Such acts highlight the determination of violent extremists to silence the voice of free media and cannot be tolerated. We call on the Transitional Federal Government to ensure the safety and protection of a free and independent media in Somalia. A vibrant media will be an integral part of Somalia's path to elections in 2009 by facilitating the exchange of views necessary for lasting peace and stability."
***15.10.2007. Iraqi Syndicate of Journalists says four Iraqi journalists killed, warns to expose associations who trade off the cause to receive contributions, and accuses US forces and the UN for inability to protect Iraqi journalists
The Iraqi Syndicate of Journalists (ISJ) said Monday evening that four journalists have been brutally killed in Iraq.
The ISJ cried out telling the world that despite the continuous call to spare Iraqi journalists from their lives being taken away from them, the daily drama continues of gunning down the creative work of those journalists slain.
In a statement issued in Baghdad and released from the headquarters of the International Covenant for the Protection of Journalists (ICPJ) in Geneva, the ISJ said that the world conscience is still silent on the International, Regional and Arab levels vis a vis the horrific tragedy of Iraqi journalists.
The list of the four slain Iraqi journalists:
1-Saleh Mohammed of the Washington Post, who was gunned down by unidentified gunmen in the Sayedia district.
2-Jassim Mohamed Nofal
3-Khaled Mohamed Nofal
4-Ziad Tareq
The three worked for the Iraq Al Watan newspaper and were gunned down in Northern Iraq by a military group in a public street leading to the city of Kirkuk.
The Syndicate noted with grief that since March 2003 more than 248 Iraqi journalists were killed.
The ISJ, while expressing its stunning shock vis a vis this daily massacre, calls upon all concerned parties to engage in serious work and held the US forces full responsibility for not implementing the Geneva conventions which holds them responsible for safeguarding the lives of civilians among them the journalists.
The ISJ also announced that it holds the United Nations with the moral responsibility for not taking any measures so far to protect journalists and not acting on a new international convention that would protect all journalists including the Iraqis and the families whose main bread earner has perished.
In addition, the ISJ calls upon the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) in Brussels, the Federation of Arab Journalists (FAJ) Cairo, the ICPJ and the Press Emblem Campaign (PEC) in Geneva to take the necessary steps to exercise their moral pressure on international organizations to find a new mechanism to put an end to this daily massacre, unforeseen in the history of journalism.
The ISJ accused other press organizations and other international organizations for receiving contributions in the name of the Iraqi journalists without delivering those contributions to those entitled and pinpointed at organizations in New York and Paris.
However, the ISJ noted that it has received a modest sum from the IFJ to lend assistance to the families of fallen journalists.
In its outrage, the ISJ noted that it will expose all those who have used the Iraqi journalists as a trade off for collecting contributions.
In conclusion the ISJ expressed its condolences to the families of the gunned journalists, and all the families of fallen Iraqi journalists who took a position of integrity in their quest to reach the truth and to expose it, while upholding the principle of freedom of opinion and expression, a core human rights principle guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other Human Rights instruments.
The Iraqi Syndicate of Journalists Baghdad-Geneva
***15.10.2007. Myanmar: ICRC deeply worried about the fate of those arrested
A large number of people have been arrested in Myanmar following the recent demonstrations. What is the ICRC's reaction?
The ICRC is deeply worried about the fate of thousands of people who have reportedly been arrested in connection with recent events in Myanmar. We have been contacted by dozens of worried families asking for help to locate their relatives who have reportedly been detained or are missing.
The ICRC is seeking access to recently detained persons in order to assess their conditions of treatment and detention according to its usual procedures and help them resume contact with their anxious families.
What has the ICRC done to obtain access to detainees?
We have been trying to re-establish a meaningful dialogue with the government to address the most urgent humanitarian problems, particularly the issue of access to detainees and those injured during recent events. We regret that our efforts have not yet produced any tangible results but we remain determined to pursue them.
The ICRC has been very outspoken in its criticism of the Myanmar authorities recently. What were the reasons for this decision?
The ICRC's objective everywhere is to help victims of armed conflict and other situations of violence quickly and effectively and to work towards the respect of International Humanitarian Law. From 1999 to 2005 the ICRC was active in Myanmar and observed improvements in several areas of humanitarian concern. But to achieve long-lasting results, it needs to have an efficient channel of dialogue with the authorities in Myanmar and be allowed to work as a strictly neutral and independent humanitarian organization. In Myanmar, this has not been the case over the past two years. Since December 2005, the government has been imposing increasing restrictions on our humanitarian activities, effectively making it impossible to continue the delivery of essential aid to thousands of detainees and civilians in need along the Thai-Myanmar border.
In addition, the ICRC has documented significant and repeated violations of International Humanitarian Law and has consistently tried to engage the authorities in a serious discussion with a view to putting a stop to them.
What will the ICRC's next step be?
We will not spare any effort in trying to restore a substantial dialogue with the government of Myanmar with the aim of addressing violations of international humanitarian law publicly raised on 29 June (see press release) and humanitarian issues connected with recent violent events.
**06.10.2007. IFJ Marks Anniversary of Anna Politkovskaya Killing With New Call to End Impunity
A year after the brutal killing of Russian investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya sent shock waves around the world of journalism the crisis of impunity in the targeted killing of reporters is intensifying warns the International Federation of Journalists.
The IFJ, the world’s largest journalists’ organisation, today called for renewed efforts to end impunity and said that 2007 is likely to set a new high-water mark the number of journalists killed over their work.
The IFJ says that around 148 journalists and media workers worldwide have been killed so far in 2007, only a handful short of the total for last year which broke all previous records.
“Journalists around the world will spend this weekend reflecting on Anna’s shocking death which has come to symbolise the hundreds of journalists who are targeted and killed each year for their work,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “Too often the killings go uninvestigated and unpunished. On the rare occasions when the people who carried out the murders are found guilty those who gave the orders have remained beyond the law.”
Politkovskaya, an internationally renowned Kremlin critic who regularly exposed human rights abuses by Russian forces in Chechnya, was shot in the entrance to her block of flats on 7th October 2006. Her assassination sparked protests and demonstrations around the world in sympathy for her family and demanding justice.
After months of silence the investigation came alive in August when the police arrested ten suspects including former officials from the Federal Security Service (FSB), Russia’s interior ministry and a criminal gang led by an ethnic Chechen. Two of the suspects were later released and the District Military Court announced that the arrest of the FSB officer was not connected with the Politkovskaya inquiry. Meanwhile an 11th suspect, Shamil Burayev, the former head of the Achkhoi-Martan administrative district of Chechnya, was arrested in September.
Disturbingly however, within a week of the arrests Pyotr Garibyan, the detective leading the investigation, was replaced. Garibyan, who has impressed Politkovskaya’s family and colleagues for his professionalism, remains on the case, but many fear he has been demoted for his success. Meanwhile there were further criticisms after the General Prosecutor, Yuri Chaika, announced that the murder was almost certainly planned by Russian enemies abroad attempting to destabilise the country.
“While it is too soon to pass judgment on the investigation we do urge the Russian government to provide the investigators with all the support required and not to interfere or obstruct the work,” said White.
Russia has one of the highest death rates among journalists of any country in the world with 289 recorded deaths since 1993. In the past year seven other Russian journalists have died including Anatoly Voronin, Ilya Lukash, Vadim Kuznetsov, Konstantin Borovko, Ivan Goryaev-Sandji, Ivan Safronov and Leonid Etkind
***05.10.2007. One year after death of Anna Politkovskaya - more action needed from the Russian authorities (Amnesty International)
During this week, people all around the world, including members and supporters of Amnesty International, will commemorate Russian journalist and human rights defender Anna Politkovskaya, who was murdered on 7 October 2006 outside her flat in Moscow. She was almost certainly killed because of her work as a journalist, in which she exposed human rights violations throughout Russia. Amnesty International believes that the handling to date of the criminal investigation into her death shows that there is little political will to bring those who ordered the killing to justice.
Since late August 2007 at least 12 people have been detained in connection with the murder but several were released when it transpired that they had an alibi. The publicly named suspects in 2the case include officials from the Ministry of Interior, the Federal Security Service (FSB) and a former head of a local administration in Chechnya. However, a year after the death of Anna Politkovskaya, not only does the murderer still need to be identified, but there appears to be no progress in the investigation to determine who ordered the killing. While Anna Politkovskayas former colleagues from the newspaper Novaya Gazeta (New Newspaper) had expressed satisfaction throughout the year over the work done by the group at the Office of the General Prosecutor responsible for the investigation of the murder, they are now concerned that those who ordered the killing will not be brought to justice. In addition, the lawyer of three Chechen brothers who are among those detained for their alleged involvement in the murder, has claimed his clients have been ill-treated. This, as well as the apparently mistaken detention of other suspects, gives rise to the fear that the investigation is not conducted in full line with the requirements of the law.
Anna Politkovskaya faced intimidation and harassment from the Russian and Chechen authorities due to her outspoken criticism of government policy and action. After she began writing in 1999 about the armed conflict in Chechnya and the North Caucasus, she was detained, and threatened with serious reprisals, including death threats, on several occasions. She interviewed Russians, Chechens and members of other ethnic groups who reported being tortured or otherwise ill-treated, or to whom justice had otherwise reportedly been denied by the authorities of the Russian Federation. For exposing in her reporting serious human rights violations, corruption and other violations of the law in the Russian Federation, she was branded as a supporter of terrorists, and as an enemy of the Russian people. This did not stop her, but rather - recognizing the restrictions which continue to hamper the independent reporting from Chechnya and the North Caucasus - she considered it to be her task to continue writing about those who otherwise had no voice.
Today, other journalists, human rights defenders and lawyers in the Russian Federation continue to face attacks, threats and intimidation, including death threats. Many prefer not to talk about it publicly, but in recent years Amnesty International has received credible information from several human rights defenders and journalists about serious threats made against them in order to silence them. Such threats have come from both state and non-state actors.
One of those under threat, journalist Fatima Tlisova, wrote about the situation in the North Caucasus for several news agencies. She said at a press conference in Washington earlier this year that she feared there had been attempts to poison her while she was living in Nalchik in Kabardino-Balkaria. In another case, that of Magomed Mutsolvgov (a human rights defender from Ingushetia), a website operated from the Republic of Ingushetia published a letter earlier this year by someone who claimed he had overheard conversations among members of the law enforcement agencies in which they discussed the need to halt, by any possible means, the work of Magomed Mutsolgov. Magomed Mutsolgov is the head of the human rights organization MASHR which supports relatives of persons who have been subjected to enforced disappearance as well as victims of torture. Shortly after this letter was carried on the website, he told Amnesty International that he was sure he was followed.
Amnesty International calls on the Russian authorities to clearly and unequivocally speak out in defence of journalists, lawyers and human rights defenders who talk openly about the human rights situation in the Russian Federation.
Amnesty International calls on Federal and Chechen authorities to take substantive measures to enable independent monitors and journalists, including foreign journalists, to report from Chechnya without fear of reprisals.
Furthermore, Amnesty International calls on the Russian authorities to protect journalists, human rights defenders and lawyers by vigorously investigating allegations of attacks on journalists, human rights defenders and lawyers, including, but not limited to, the murder of Anna Politkovskaya. Those who are found responsible for such crimes, including those who ordered or masterminded the attacks, should be brought to justice without delay.
***30.09.2007. With Internet still disconnected, concern mounts about fate of monks and civilian detainees (RSF)
Although fixed-line phones and some mobiles are still working, the complete absence of Internet in Burma is making it harder and harder to send photos and video footage about the situation in Rangoon and the rest of the country. Nothing is being reported about what is happening to the thousands of prisoners of conscience.
Reporters Without Borders and the Burma Media Association call on the international media to use every possible means to try to break through this news blackout, especially about the fate of the detainees, who risk being tortured. The two organisations also urge UN envoy Ibrahim Gambari to publicly condemn the measures taken by the military junta to block the free flow of news and information.
After restoring the Internet for a few hours yesterday, the authorities have again disconnected it. Yesterday afternoon, troops took up position around the headquarters of the leading ISP, Myanmar Infotech, whose website (www.myanmarinfotech.com.mm), like all websites with the .mm country domain suffix, is currently down.
It seems that government officials are able to send email messages, after verification of their content, from inside the department of posts and telecommunications building, which is controlled by troops.
“Military prior censorship, long applied to the print media, is now being applied to the Internet,” Reporters Without Borders and the BMA said. “This case of prior control of all information sent by Internet is unique in the world.”
As a result, no photos or video footage have been published about the fate of the 700 monks held by the military, about the hundreds of civilians, including Generation 88 leaders, who have been imprisoned, about the fate of Aung San Suu Kyi and others National League for Democracy leaders, about the situation inside the monasteries now controlled by the army, or about Insein prison, north of the former capital, where hundreds of prisoners of conscience are held.
Because Rangoon is now under tight military control, no journalist has been able to verify whether hundreds of monks are indeed being held inside the Rangoon Technological Institute or in a disused race course known as Kyeikkasan Interrogation Center. The news website Irrawaddy quoted a monastery official as saying monks had been forced to take off their robes and wear prisoner uniforms.
Today, some peaceful demonstrations were reported in Pakokku, Sittwe and Taung Goke with thousands of participants, but no images emerged because of the Internet blackout.
The news blackout is fueling rumours about the number of victims and about divisions within the regime. “One should not believe either the regime’s propaganda or the crazy rumours going around the country,” a journalist in Rangoon said.
29.09.2007. Military’s Tactics against Burmese Uprising Target Journalism (IFJ)
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has condemned Burma's military rulers for the ongoing harassment of foreign journalists and the Burmese media. The media have come under increasing attack since a protest led by monks against the military junta began nearly two weeks ago.
Japanese cameraman, Kenji Nagai, was the latest journalist casualty in the protests, having been tragically shot to death when the military opened fire on a crowd of protesters in an attempt to disperse the crowd. Nagai had been in Burma for only a few days to cover the protests for photo and video agency, APF News.
“We are saddened by the death of Mr. Nagai and others who have lost their lives in this peaceful protest,” IFJ Asia Pacific Director Jacqueline Park said. “This act of aggression from the military to fire on unarmed civilians was completely unprovoked and unjust.”
On Thursday September 27, police intimidated foreign journalists into showing them their IDs after authorities stormed several hotels where journalists were residing, where access to internet and international phone lines remained open.
Military censors threatened reprisals against journalists who challenged the regime by refusing to follow its demands. A local source in Burma has also reported that the Burmese regime yesterday ordered the closure of some privately-owned newspapers that refused to print government propaganda.
“The military junta continues to escalate acts of unprovoked violence,” Park said. “With the protests already resulting in a number of deaths and injuries, the Burmese government has worked tirelessly to prevent journalists reporting the truth.”
The IFJ calls on the Burmese military to respect Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which declares that “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
For further information contact IFJ Asia-Pacific on +61 2 9333 0919
Evidence emerges of intentional shooting of Japanese cameraman in Burma (CPJ)
New York, September 28, 2007 — The Committee to Protect Journalists is outraged by the apparently deliberate fatal shooting of Japanese cameramanKenji Nagai by a Burmese soldier on Thursday. Video footage shown on Japan’s Fuji News Network reveals that Nagai, who was filming near a group of demonstrators in Yangon, was pushed to the ground and shot at near point-blank range.
The Japanese embassy in Burma said the bullet entered Nagai’s body from the lower right side of his chest, pierced his heart, and exited from his back. Their statement contradicts Burmese authorities’ claims that Nagai was killed by a stray bullet. Nagai, dressed in shorts and sandals, was clearly a foreigner and a journalist, who was carrying a video camera at the time he was shot.
“The government’s use of violence to suppress political dissent has now taken the life of a journalist,” said Joel Simon CPJ’s executive director. “The apparently cold-blooded killing of Kenji Nagai by Burmese government troops cannot go unaddressed. We call on the government to ensure the safety of all journalists covering this unrest.”
Nagai, 50, who was working for APF News, a video and photo agency based in Tokyo, was one of at least nine people killed by government troops during anti-government demonstrations yesterday, according to official state-run television. Another 11 demonstrators and 31 security force members were injured, the broadcast said.
Even before the video surfaced, the Japanese government lodged a formal protest with the Burmese government and sent a senior diplomat to the capital to seek clarification of Nagai’s death. And as the anti-government demonstrations continue, a special United Nations envoy, Ibrahim Gambari, will go to Burma to try to convince the military government to end the violence and negotiate with pro-democracy leaders.
As the violence and confrontations continue, the government has increasingly clamped down on Internet communications inside and out of the country. On Friday, all Internet connections were severed, according to Burmese exiles. With Burma largely closed to international journalists and the Burmese media heavily controlled by the government, much of the coverage of the past weeks’ demonstrations had been reported by bloggers and Web sites run by exiles.
Internet disconnected, newspapers closed and foreign journalists under surveillance as junta tries to seal off Burma (RSF) As the military junta continues its crackdown on pro-democracy protests, it has stepped up its strategy of isolating Burma, trying to reproduce the scenario of the 1988 massacres when witness accounts of the bloodshed only reached the outside world after it was over.
“There is an urgent need to help Burmese and foreign journalists to continue to do their job of reporting the news,” Reporters Without Borders and the Burma Media Association said. “This is a criminal regime, as the Japanese photographer’s murder has shown, and it is trying by all possible means to create a situation of complete isolation.”
The two organisations added: “The repression, with its dozens of deaths and hundreds if not thousands of arrests, is gaining pace, but the flow of news and information is drying up. The international community must take action to prevent this news blackout.”
The government disconnected the Internet at 11 a.m. today, adding to the country’s isolation. The leading ISP, an offshoot of the ministry of technologies, tried to blame it on a technical problem with an underwater cable. Reuters said no one was answering the phone at the ISP’s headquarters. Everyone questioned by Reporters Without Borders and the BMA described the official excuse as “ridiculous.”
All the Internet cafés are closed and the military are hounding the foreign journalists still working on the ground. At least one was forced to take refuge in an embassy or go underground.
The flow of news has slowed right down in the past two days. The international video news exchange system EVN has hardly any new footage for international TV stations.
Journalists in Rangoon said it was virtually impossible go to the centre of the city. Some said they had seen more arrests and more violence against civilians. According to these accounts, there are still many groups of demonstrators.
It has meanwhile been confirmed that several Burmese publications, including those owned by the Eleven Media and Pyi Myanmar press groups, have closed after refusing to publish propaganda articles. Editors said the public would not be interested in buying their publications if they could not read about the demonstrations. Reporters Without Borders and the BMA hail their courage in resisting the regime’s dictates.
The English-language Myanmar Times, which is run by an Australian, appears to have decided to continue publishing. Its website shows a picture of a photographer in a peaceful rural setting and makes no mention of the demonstrations or the use of violence to disperse them.
Although banned, many residents used satellite dishes to watch international TV stations. “Everyone is tuned to the Burmese-language international radio stations and the foreign TV stations,” said a journalist in Rangoon. “That is why the regime’s media have attacked these international radio stations. It is disgraceful.” Government news media such MRTV-3 have called the BBC and VOA “destructionist” and say they are in the pay of foreign powers.
28.09.2007. DAY OF ACTION FOR THE PEOPLE OF MYANMAR ARTICLE 19, South East Press Alliance (SEAPA), the Cambodian Centre for Human Rights, the Alliance of Independent Journalists of Indonesia (AJI) and Reporters without Borders (RSF) call for a day of solidarity and prayer for the people of Myanmar tomorrow, September 29, 2007. The PEC joined this appeal.
On the occasion of the 8th informal Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Seminar on Human Rights we will gather at Angkor Wat to demonstrate our solidarity with the Burmese people, and condemn the violence that has claimed lives, including the life of a journalist, and shattered the peaceful demonstrations in Myanmar.
Attending the ASEM Seminar as representatives of NGOs and governments, we will hold a moment of silence and prayer for the people of Myanmar at 11 AM, September 29, and stage a short program of statements to express solidarity with the democratic aspirations of the Burmese as well as to call on the Burmese junta to exercise restraint in dealing with the protesters around their country.
There can be no justification for the bloodshed recently reported, as we have, one with the whole world, witnessed the courageous yet orderly, peaceful, and dignified conduct of the protesting Burmese and their religious leaders.
We urge the country's ruling junta to put an immediate end to the use of violence, and to respect the human rights of the Burmese people, including the universally accepted and guaranteed rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. We call for the release of all political prisoners, including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, and for the return to democracy.
We celebrate the courage of the Burmese people, civil society and monks. We urge all governments and all societies to listen to, keep alive, and support the Burmese people?s demands for democracy, peace, and national reconciliation.
We welcome the statement issued by the Asian and European participants to the ASEM, in Siem Reap, Cambodia, which joins the global expressions of outrage and concern for the developments in Myanmar.
28.09.2007. ICPJ says arguments against an International Convention to Protect Journalists are wrong, null and void - ICPJ condemns strongly the killing of a Japanese journalist in Burma
GENEVA, September 28 (ICPJ) – The International Covenant for the Protection of Journalists (ICPJ) said that daily casualties among journalists including that of today when a Japanese cameraman was killed while covering civil unrest proves that arguments against an International Convention to protect journalists in conflict zones and civil unrest are wrong, null and void.
The ICPJ condemns in the strongest possible manner the ongoing killings of journalists the latest today in Burma.
ICPJ Vice President for Asia Moaid ALLamy noted that two days ago a historic turn took place in the United Arab Emirates when its deputy ruler and ruler of Dubai Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al - Maktoum abolished the prison penalty against journalists.
After rejoicing for only 48 hours, ALLamy added the media community is saddened again with another fallen colleague, this time not in a war zone but while covering a situation of civil unrest in Burma.
Being victimized by the Iraq conflict, ALLamy stood against all arguments that deny journalists a specialized convention.
He added that the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) employees international or national are also civilians, however, they bear a protective emblem because their profession calls for such added protection.
The journalists, he added, are like the ICRC employees who need special protection in the form of a specialized convention.
Journalists are like physicians, a profession that needs protection to come to the rescue of victims.
If a journalist falls, life has been violated, and forever the journalist would be disabled.
Journalists are therefore crippled and violated, but the struggle will continue to allow them to work freely and in dignity while doing the utmost to protect life.
The ICPJ, he added, presents its condolences to the Japanese media outlet which lost its cameraman and to his family.
***04.09.2007 Russia: Extremism Legislation Abused to Silence Alternative Voices -ARTICLE 19, Global Campaign for Free Expression, is deeply concerned about the harassment of the Nizhny Novgorod Foundation to Support Tolerance.
On 29 August 2007, three police officers entered the Foundation's premises with order No. 39, signed by the head of the Ministry of the Interior's regional department, and seized its computers. This was done in the context of an investigation on possible "extremist activities" by the organisation. The police also warned that they were carrying out an investigation into the Foundation's finances.
The Foundation was established in March 2007 as a successor to the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society (RCFS), with the aim of promoting tolerance and understanding in the Russian Federation (Russia). The RCFS, which provided alternative information on conflict in the North Caucasus, including human rights violations in Chechnya, became the subject of harassment and was eventually shut down in January 2007. The former head of the RCFS, a current member of the Foundation, Stanislav Dmitrievsky, was convicted of "inciting racial hatred" in February 2006 after he published peaceful statements by Chechen separatist leaders. On 17 August 2007, the Nizhni Novgorod District Court approved a motion by the Regional Department of the Implementation of Criminal Sentences to increase the sentence handed down against Stanislav Dmitrievsky in 2006.
The same policemen who had visited the Foundation to Support Tolerance also raided the Nizhny Novgorod office of independent newspaper Novaya Gazeta on 30 August, with order No. 40 signed by the head of the Ministry of Interior's regional department, and their computers were also seized.
The office of the Nizhny Novgorod Human Rights Alliance was also raided on the same day. The Alliance's staff stated that this was their fourth inspection in seven days.
A pattern of seeking to suppress the provision of alternative information emerges from the actions against the Foundation to Support Tolerance, Novaya Gazeta, the Human Rights Alliance and the RCFS. This seems to be part of a series of so-called "anti-extremist" actions promoted by the local authorities. Following the 28 August meeting of the Anti-Terrorism Committee of the Nizhny Novgorod region, the governor declared that all youth organisations of Nizhny Novgorod had to be checked for "signs of extremism", to assess their potential "danger", a "necessary" measure in light of the forthcoming elections. ARTICLE 19 notes that anti-extremism legislation is often abused to silence dissenting voices in Russia, rather than employed to respond to genuine cases of incitement to hatred or violence. Meanwhile the Russian authorities have adopted a range of measures to restrict any voice that criticise their actions in Chechnya.
While States are permitted to take measures against hate speech, a clear distinction should be drawn between speech that genuinely incites to discrimination, hostility or violence, and statements which are intended to contribute to a debate about conflicts, their causes and solutions. International standards permit restrictions to freedom of expression on the grounds of national security only in cases in which an act is intended to incite violence and where there is a direct and immediate link between the act and the likelihood or occurrence of violence.
ARTICLE 19 therefore calls upon the Russian authorities to:
- Return all computers to the raided organisations, and allow them to operate free of harassment and interference. - Ensure that anti-extremism legislation is used only in the context of statements and actions that are intended to incite violence and where there is a direct and immediate link between the action and the likelihood or occurrence of violence, or statements that incite to discrimination, hostility or violence. - Take measures to create the conditions for media pluralism in Russia, including the free expression of opinions and information on the situation in Chechnya.
For further information, please contact Federica Prina, Senior Programme Officer - Europe, federica@article19.org, +44 20 7278 9292.
***31.08.2007. DEATH PENALTY GIVEN IN JOURNALIST MURDER CASE ALARMS UN MISSION IN DR CONGO New York, Aug 31 2007 4:00PM The United Nations peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) today expressed serious concern at the death penalty verdict given to four men convicted of murdering a journalist working for a UN-sponsored radio station with the largest Francophone audience in sub-Saharan Africa.
Two men were sentenced as the assassins by a military tribunal and the other two were convicted of sponsoring and organizing the killing of Serge Maheshe, which took place on 13 June in Bukavu in the far east of the DRC, as Mr. Maheshe and two friends were about to enter a UN-marked vehicle. His friends were not injured in the attack.
In a statement to the press today in Kinshasa, the DRC capital, the mission (MONUC) said that while it respected judicial independence in the vast African country, it considered that the tribunal did not base its verdict on the results of the autopsy or on any ballistic expert testimony.
“In fact, the tribunal noted that the confessions of the two principal accused contained contradictions and that certain allegations made by them cannot be corroborated,” the press statement said. “The tribunal itself underlined that doubts remained.”
MONUC stressed the UN principle, enshrined in a 1984 resolution of the Economic and Social Council (<" http://www.un.org/ecosoc">ECOSOC), that a verdict of capital punishment must be based on “clear and convincing evidence that does not leave room for any other interpretation of the facts.” The judicial proceeding must also offer all possible guarantees of a fair trial.
Noting that an appeal had been launched by the convicted men, the mission said all guarantees of a just and equitable trial must be respected and all the pieces of evidence considered, and it pledged to provide legal authorities in DR Congo with any technical or logistical help they required.
Mr. Maheshe had been a senior journalist with Radio Okapi, a partnership between MONUC and the Hirondelle Foundation, a Swiss non-governmental organization (NGO), since 2003. Aged 31 at the time of his death, he left behind a wife and two children.
***28.08.2007. IFJ Welcomes Politkovskaya Arrests But Says More Evidence Needed of Russian Action to Counter Impunity
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today gave a cautious welcome to news that 10 people have been arrested for their involvement in the murder of Russian investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya.
“We are pleased that arrests have been made,” said IFJ General Secretary Aidan White. “But like our colleagues in Russia we are anxious for more information. We need to know that not only the hired killers of Anna Politkovskaya are brought to justice, but also those who ordered her assassination.”
The IFJ, which is supporting an investigation of unexplained killings of journalists in Russia over the past 15 years, says it will watch developments carefully. “This is a welcome first step, but there is a long way to go before we can be confident that justice will be delivered,” said White.
Russian Prosecutor-General Yuri Chaika announced today that 10 people have been held in connection with the murder of Politkovskaya, an investigative reporter of international renown, on October 7th last year. He gave no further details.
The killing brought international attention to the danger that journalists face in Russia. Politkovskaya was shot outside her Moscow apartment, one of four killings of media staff in Russia in 2006. Around 255 journalists and media staff have been killed in Russia since 1993. Many of these deaths have been explained, but since President Vladimir Putin came to power around 20 killings of journalists have taken place and none of them have been satisfactorily resolved. At its World Congress in Moscow in May, the IFJ unanimously adopted a resolution calling for an immediate end to manipulation of journalism by private and political interests.
“If Russia prosecutes those who ordered Anna’s killing it will send a strong message that there will no longer be impunity for journalists’ killers,” said White.
The IFJ has developed a database on the killings of journalists in Russia since the early 1990s. Based on the work of Russia’s two media monitors, the Glasnost Defence Foundation and the Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations, the IFJ database details when, where and how so many journalists and media workers have died or gone missing.
***24.08.2007. Iran: Release of Scholar Welcomed but Other Releases Still Urged ARTICLE 19, Index on Censorship and English PEN welcome the release on conditional bail of Dr Haleh Esfandiari and call for the immediate release of Dr. Kian Tajbakhsh and Mr Ali Shakeri.
We welcome the unexpected release of Dr Haleh Esfandiari on conditional bail from Tehran's Evin prison on Tuesday 22 August. Dr Esfandiari has spent months behind bars on the highly speculative charge of "acting against security by engaging in propaganda against the Islamic republic by methods of spying on behalf of foreigners". She has been released on bail of 3 billion rials (about US$333,000).
Dr Esfandiari is the Director of the Middle East programme at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in the United States and is an Iranian-US citizen. She was in Iran to visit her ailing 93-year-old mother in Tehran. In December, she was robbed at knifepoint and her travel documents taken. She was then refused permission to leave the country and subjected to lengthy interrogations (up to 8 hours per day) by the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence until mid-February. On 7 May, Dr Esfandiari was told to report to the Ministry of Intelligence and was held in custody at Evin Prison until 22 August.
While we greatly welcome the conditional release of Dr Esfandiari, we are deeply concerned by the ongoing detention of two other Iranian-US citizens on similarly speculative national security charges: Dr Kian Tajbakhsh, a consultant with the Soros Foundation's Open Society Institute and Ali Shakeri, a founding board member of the Center for Citizen Peace building at the University of California, Irvine. Both have also been also held in custody since early May 2007 at Evin Prison in Tehran.
We urgently call upon the Iranian authorities to also release Dr Kian Tajbakhsh and Mr Ali Shakeri. As outlined below, both of these individuals are involved in important peace building and development work and the Iranian authorities have not produced any evidence of their activities posing a threat to the national security of Iran
Furthermore, we call upon the Iranian government to drop all changes against Dr Esfandiari and to allow her to leave Iran and return to the United States and her family.
Background Dr Kian Tajbakhsh is an internationally-respected Iranian-American scholar, social scientist and urban planner. From 1994 until 2001, Dr Tajbakhsh taught Urban Policy and Politics at the New School for Social Research in New York City. Dr Tajbakhsh is also an international expert in the areas of local government reform, urban planning, public health, and social policy. He has acted as a consultant for several Iranian government organisations, including the Municipalities Organisation, the Social Security Organisation, and the Ministry of the Interior, and with international nongovernmental organisations such as the World Bank, the Open Society Institute, and the Netherlands Association of Municipalities. His work in Iran has included evaluating humanitarian relief and rebuilding projects in the aftermath of the devastating 2003 earthquake in Bam. In 2006, he completed a three-year study of the local government sector in Iran. Dr Kian Tajbakhsh was arrested at his home in Tehran on 11 May 2007 and is being held at Evin Prison in Tehran.
Dr Haleh Esfandiari was robbed at knifepoint on 30 December 2006 by three men while on the way to the airport after visiting her ailing 93-year-old mother in Tehran, whom she had visited approximately twice a year over the past decade. During this incident, the men threatened to kill her; then they stole her baggage and both her US and Iranian passports. Consequently, she was not permitted to leave the country. When she applied for new travel documents, she was instead barred from leaving Iran and interrogated for up to eight hours a day over a period of several weeks (until February 14) by authorities from the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence. On 7 May 2007, she was told to report to the Ministry of Intelligence. Upon her arrival there on the morning of 8 May she was taken into custody and driven to Tehran's Evin Prison where she has been held in custody ever since.
Mr Ali Shakeri is a businessman in Irvine, California with Global Estate Funding, having graduated from the University of Texas with a business administration degree. He is an Iranian-American peace activist who serves on the Community Advisory Board of the Center for Citizen Peace building at the University of California, Irvine. He went to Iran to visit his mother, who was ill and died during his visit. He is believed to have been detained since 8 May 2007. After several weeks denying Shakeri's detention, the Iranian authorities have finally admitted that he was under their custody.
For more information, please contact Sophie Redmond, Legal Officer, ARTICLE 19 +442072391191 or Jo Glanville, Editor of Index on Censorship 0771302 0971
***20.08.2007.International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to Nepal International media organisations call for an end to attacks on the press Members of the ?International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to Nepal? have been closely monitoring the developments in Nepal since the process of restoring democracy and press freedoms began in April 2006. The International Mission welcomes the enactment of the Right to Information Act and steps to protect the rights of journalists under the Working Journalists Act. In addition, we commend those Nepali journalists and media and freedom of expression organisations that have continuously advocated for legislative reform and defended press freedoms.
At the same time, the International Mission remains highly concerned about the continuing violence against journalists and the media in Nepal, including by groups affiliated with the former combatant parties in the conflict. According to information provided by Nepali sources, there have been over 116 incidents of attempts to prevent journalists from doing their job of informing the people between 1 January and 31 July 2007 alone.
These incidents include arrests, attacks on media companies, abduction of journalists, threats and harassment and obstructions to the free flow of information, including disruptions in the production processes. It is disturbing that the same media which played a leading role in the restoration of democracy a year ago have now become the target of attacks from various groups.
A free and fairly elected Constituent Assembly remains the next vital step in Nepal?s peace process. The Constituent Assembly, for which elections are currently scheduled for November, will have a mandate to adopt a new Constitution which will define the structure of the State. Such a process depends on increased and informed debate in which the positions of all stakeholders are heard, and this will only be possible if there is a free, independent and pluralistic media able to inform the public without fear of retribution. The lack of such a plural and unobstructed media environment throughout the country, and specifically in those areas affected by conflict, could jeopardise a free and fair outcome to the elections.
We therefore call on all stakeholders, including the Government and specifically the Ministry of Information, the political parties and affiliated groups throughout Nepal, the numerous active interest groups and the Nepali people in general to work collectively to build an environment that enables the media to report on the elections effectively and safely free from intimidation or attack.
Members of the International Mission include:
ARTICLE 19 Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) FreeVoice International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) International Media Support (IMS) International Press Institute (IPI) International News Safety Institute (INSI) Reporters Without Borders (RSF) United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC) World Association of Newspapers (WAN) World Press Freedom Committee (WPFC)
***14.08.2007. UNESCO ALARMED BY GROWING VIOLENCE AGAINST JOURNALISTS IN SOMALIA New York, Aug 14 2007 5:00PM The head of the United Nations body mandated to protect press freedom today voiced grave concern at the growing violence against the media in Somalia following the murder of two journalists and the injuring of a third.
“Journalists and media workers provide a service that is essential for any democratic society, a service that becomes all the more vital in societies that are trying to find their way out of strife,” UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura said in a statement.
“Journalists play an indispensable role in enabling citizens to hold open debate and make informed decisions. There can be no acceptable political or religious reason for attacking the men and women who make possible the fundamental human right of freedom of expression,” he added.
HornAfrik Radio journalist Mahad Ahmed Elmi was gunned down by four unknown men on Saturday and Ali Iman Sharmarke, founder and chairman of HornAfrik, was killed in his car by a remotely detonated mine as he returned from his colleague’s funeral. Reuters News Agency Reporter Sahal Abdulle was injured in the blast.
No group has so far claimed responsibility for the crimes, the most recent in a spate of attacks against the media which brings to six the number of journalists killed this year in a country that has had no functioning central government since the regime of Muhammad Siad Barre was toppled in 1991.
In an earlier statement condemning the attacks, UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Somalia Eric Laroche called for decisive action to ensure the freedom and safety of the media in the faction-riven country.
***13.08.2007. WITH TWO MORE JOURNALISTS KILLED IN SOMALIA, UN URGES ‘DECISIVE ACTION’ TO PROTECT MEDIA
New York, Aug 13 2007 7:00PM A senior United Nations official has called for decisive action to ensure the freedom and safety of the media in Somalia following the weekend killing of two prominent journalists in the strife-torn Horn of Africa country.
“The violent events of the last days show how vulnerable freedom of expression remains in Somalia,” UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Somalia Eric Laroche said in a statement strongly condemning the murders.
“The Transitional Federal Government is responsible for ending impunity for attacks on journalists by conducting prompt and impartial investigations and preventing any form of harassment of the media,” he added, calling on all authorities and other groups in the faction-ridden country to respect the right of all to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information through any media.
HornAfrik Radio journalist Mahad Ahmed Elmi was gunned down by four unknown men on Saturday and Ali Iman Sharmarke, founder and chairman of HornAfrik, was reportedly killed in his car by a remotely detonated device as he returned from his colleague’s funeral. Two other journalists travelling in Mr. Sharmarke’s car escaped with injuries.
Mr. Sharmarke was a Somali-Canadian who returned to Mogadishu nine years ago to establish and manage the media group, which works regularly with the UN on AIDS and mine awareness, child soldier recruitment and other programmes.
Both victims were respected figures among Somali journalists who strive to keep alive freedom of information and principles of impartial and accurate reporting in the country, which has seen a resurgence of violence since the Ethiopian-backed Transitional Federal Government (TFG) drove Islamist groups out of Mogadishu, the capital, last December.
A third journalist, Abdihakim Omar Jimale, from Radio Mogadishu, was also the victim of an assassination attempt on Friday evening and is still under medical supervision for his injuries.
No group has so far claimed responsibility for the crimes, the most recent in a spate of attacks against the media which brings to six the number of journalists killed this year in a country that has had no functioning central government since the regime of Muhammad Siad Barre was toppled in 1991.
On Friday morning nine journalists and other workers of Radio Shabelle were seized for several hours without court order by a senior police officer who was looking for the journalist who had just broadcast a report about a security-related event the night before.
The journalist, Mohamed Abdi Farah ‘Afgoye,’ has been in hiding since and fears for his life. The same radio station had been threatened a few days before by a foreign diplomat whose threats were recorded and broadcast by the station.
Meanwhile, in a closed meeting today, the Security Council was briefed by François Lonsény Fall, the Secretary-General’s Special Representative for Somalia, on recent developments in the country.
Last week, Mr. Fall called on the TFG to invite opposition groups to join the reconciliation meeting taking place in Mogadishu.
“We would like to see the stakeholders who renounce violence inside and outside the country take part in this process,” he said in an address to the National Reconciliation Congress.
He also urged participants to discuss all outstanding issues, including power-sharing and disarmament.
***12.08.2007. Jaffnas media in the grip of terror - report by Reporters Without Borders, International Media Support - International press freedom mission to Sri Lanka
Since fighting resumed in 2006 between the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the Tamil-populated Jaffna peninsula has become a nightmare for journalists, human rights activists and the civilian population in general.
Murders, kidnappings, threats and censorship have made Jaffna one of the worlds most dangerous places for journalists to work. At least seven media workers, including two journalists, have been killed there since May 2006. One journalist is missing and at least three media outlets have been physically attacked. Dozens of journalists have fled the area or abandoned the profession. None of these incidents has been seriously investigated despite government promises and the existence of suspects.
Representatives of Reporters Without Borders and International Media Support visited Jaffna on 20 and 21 June as part of an international press freedom fact-finding mission to Sri Lanka. They met Tamil journalists, military officials, civil society figures and the members of the national Human Rights Commission (HRC). This report is also based on the day-by-day press freedom monitoring done by Reporters Without Borders and other organisations in the international mission. For security reasons, the names of most of the journalists and other people interviewed are not cited here.
Since the attack on 2 May last year on the offices of the Jaffna districts most popular daily paper, Uthayan, local journalists have lived and worked in fear. One paper shut down after its editor was murdered and only three dailies are now published. Newspapers have lost 90% of their staff in the past year, as young journalists and other staff have fled the business, often under pressure from their families. The paper Valampuri now has only five correspondents in the district, down from 75 in August last year. We carry more national and international news than local reports because our staff are afraid, its editor said. We all know that a life is worth more than a news story.
The staff of Uthayan, with a circulation of over 5,000, is now down to three senior journalists and one young reporter. One of the journalists has not left the office for 13 months for fear of being gunned down the moment he steps outside.
Nation and international media correspondents are steadily leaving the district or the country after getting death threats by phone or text-message. While the fact-finding mission was in Jaffna, the last full-time foreign media correspondent got a text-message and a call from a sat-phone saying it was his last warning before he was killed. He left Jaffna the next day.
The Sri Lankan army is expected to launch a major offensive in the north after successes against the LTTE in the east, but the media in Jaffna is living in terror. The government and President Mahinda Rajapaksa must urgently promise to protect journalists and guarantee press freedom.
Escalating violence against the media
The Tamil media is the target of one the most enduring and violent wars of the past 30 years. The LTTE is fighting, including with terrorist methods, to force the central government to grant the right to self-determination to the Tamil nation. The fighting has taken more than 5,000 lives since it started up again last year and made hundreds of thousands homeless. Clashes are mainly in the north and east, but the LTTE has made attacks in Colombo and in majority Sinhalese areas.
The fighting in Jaffna, more than elsewhere, has led to extreme militarization of the region, involving curfews, humiliating treatment, restricted movement and constant identity checks. This has isolated the district from the rest of the country and created what Jaffna Bishop Thomas Soundaranayagam says is despair and a feeling of being abandoned among the population. Journalists are also victims of this fear thats paralysing our society, he says.
The military offensive relaunched against the LTTE by President Mahinda Rajapaksa has produced a sharp deterioration in human rights. The dirty war, as one Jaffna lawyer calls it, involves kidnappings and extra-judicial killings. The HRC says at least 835 civilians were kidnapped in the Jaffna district between December 2005 and May 2007 and about 600 are still missing. The local media reports the kidnappings but journalists confined to their offices cannot investigate them or the involvement of the security forces. Death-squads moving around in unmarked white vans have become the symbol of the dirty war and instil terror in the population, including journalists in Jaffna and Colombo.
Anyone who nationally or internationally condemns the situation in Jaffna risks being killed, said a local Tamil member of parliament. The murders of journalist Mylvaganam Nimalarajan and member of parliament Nadarajah Raviraj show that some people will stop at nothing to silence any reporting of the plight of civilians in the north.
The current reign of terror makes proper coverage of military operations and the situation of Tamil civilians impossible. Journalists are caught in the crossfire between the security forces, the paramilitaries and the LTTE and live in fear of reprisals for any article, commentary, photo or cartoon they produce. A cartoon making fun of the leader of the paramilitary EPDP group, Douglas Devananda, who is also a cabinet minister, appeared to have led to the murder of two employees of Uthayan in May 2006.
The August 2006 killing of Sinnathamby Sivamaharajah, managing director of the Tamil daily Namathu Eelanadu (Our Eelam Nation) and former parliamentarian, showed clearly that the death-squads no longer tolerate media that openly supports the LTTE and the paper shut down. The 68-year-old Sivamaharajah, who was also a politician, was murdered at his home in Tellippalai, an area guarded by the army 15 km from Jaffna.
The paper, launched in 2002 after the government-LTTE ceasefire, focused on local news and strongly supported Tamil nationalism. The army searched its Jaffna offices and questioned staff for several hours in December 2005.
On 2nd August 2007, Sahathevan Nilakshan, a journalism student and editor of the publication Chaalaram linked to a Tamil student union, was shot dead before the end of a nighttime curfew. Two men who arrived on a motorcycle at his home, 3 km from Jaffna, walked inside and shot him several time. Sahathevan studied at the Media Resource Training Centre (MRTC) in Jaffna.
A stifled media
The press in Jaffna was also hit by a serious shortage of newsprint and ink between August 2006 and May this year that stifled three papers. In August 2006, after fighting resumed, the government cut the A9 road between Colombo and Jaffna that passes through LTTE-controlled territory and the Jaffna district has since had to get its food and supplies by air or sea. The military at first refused to classify newsprint and ink as items needed in Jaffna.
Despite increasing demand by local people for news, the dailies Uthayan, Yarl Thinakural and Valampuri were forced to drastically reduce their size and distribution and shrank from eight or 12 pages to only four between December 2006 and April this year. Press groups had to pay high prices for standard newsprint and ink and Valampuri even had to use coloured paper.
The army blocked normal supplies despite repeated requests by the papers and a government official in Jaffna. However, it lifted the ban on 1 May this year after international pressure and supplies from Colombo arrived by sea a few days later. Our circulation is increasing because of public demand for news but were dependent on the armys goodwill, the managing editor of Valampuri said. Another Jaffna journalist said bluntly it was all part of the armys plan to shut down the Jaffna press.
The isolation and difficult working conditions were at their worst in August 2006 and during the week of total curfew the press vanished. Supplies were irregular and mobile phones were cut off. The day after a night-only curfew was restored, printing works started up again. But a delivery driver for Uthayan was shot dead at the wheel of his truck near a military checkpoint.
Closure of the A9 road badly hit distribution of national and local Tamil, Sinhalese and English-language papers. The few on sale at newsstands were very expensive, sometimes 50 times dearer than in Colombo. More than two-thirds of Jaffna towns Internet cafés have closed over the past year because of the economic crisis and curfew, making access to online news more and more difficult for local people. Journalists can use the MRTC media centre supported by the international community.
When the government blocked access to the website Tamilnet, it prevented Tamils, Sinhalese and foreigners from getting news about the situation in Jaffna, said one journalist from the Tamil daily Sudar Oli. Its the same old strategy. Tamilnet was blocked by Internet service providers on 15 June this year after official pressure.
Radio stations help ease this dearth of news and the BBC World Service, relayed by the SLBC state radio, is very popular. Colombos FM stations are also listened to but have little detailed news about Jaffna. Several Tamil journalists have strongly criticised the content of a Tamil-language news programme produced by allies of the EPDP militia and broadcast by SLBC.
Journalists are regularly refused access to official information, even when it is of general interest. Since March this year, the HRC has forbidden its local offices from giving news about cases it is investigating. Its crucial for the local press to be able to follow human rights violations, said a Jaffna lawyer. This decision, made under government pressure, conflicts with the Paris Principles that govern the HRCs work.
Jaffna journalists also feel isolated. The Colombo media rarely send reporters up here, said an official of the North Sri Lanka Journalists Association. They say its too expensive and too risky and those who come with the army to visit the front-line arent interested in the civil population, so were not protected.
Uthayan, a heroic paper
This newspaper, Jaffnas most popular Tamil daily, has paid a heavy price for doing its job since it was founded in November 1985. Its offices were bombed by the Indian army in the 1980s and then by Sri Lankan warplanes in 1990. Its staff have been threatened by several Tamil armed groups, including the EPRLF and the LTTE, that have been fighting in Jaffna for the past 20 years, and in 1999 paramilitaries threw a grenade into its offices.
The staff are on constant alert in the papers offices in central Jaffna town and one journalist lives there round-the-clock. The restrictions have also reduced the circulation from 25,000 in August 2006 to 5,000 since February this year.
While UNESCO was staging celebrations for World Press Freedom Day in Colombo, five people burst into the papers offices on 2 May 2006 and demanded to see chief reporter R. Kuhanathan. When they could not find him, they opened fire on staff and equipment, killing marketing manager Suresh Kumar, 35, and Ranjith Kumar, 28. Two other people were wounded and several computers destroyed. Official investigation of the attack produced nothing despite management giving the name of a pro-EPDP suspect to police.
One of the papers delivery drivers was shot dead at the wheel of his truck near a military checkpoint on 15 August last year. Three days later, the papers main warehouse was burned down in the citys Kobay neighbourhood and its circulation was badly hit. Armed men threatened security guards outside the papers offices on 7 September, after a curfew had been imposed, and ordered the paper to print an appeal to Jaffnas students to call off their strike. One of them, gun in hand, said in Tamil that they would come back tomorrow if it did not appear. Three days later, armed men entered the building after jumping over a wall. Police guarding the front of the building detained them but then let them go.
A motorcycle gunman shot dead one of the papers reporters, Selvarajah Rajivarnam, on 29 April this year as he was riding a bicycle near the papers offices in Jaffna Town. Rajivarnam, 24, had worked at the paper for six months covering crime stories and visiting police stations and hospitals to investigate disappearances. He was also taking evening classes in journalism at Jaffna University. He had worked for three years on Namathu Eelanadu, whose managing director was killed in August 2006. The brief police investigation of Rajivarnams murder produced nothing, but several people told Reporters Without Borders the EPDP may have been responsible.
Despite the attacks, a smaller staff continues to produce Uthayan. We had 120 employees, including 20 journalists, up to August 2006 but now weve only got 58 people, including four journalists who are fighting their fear, said editor M. V. Kanamailnathan in his Jaffna office. He said four journalists, including him, had been threatened with death by the paramilitaries. Despite our police protection since the May 2006 attack, everyone knows the paramilitaries can strike whenever they want, said one his deputies. Were victims of terror.
Uthayans sister daily in Colombo, Sudar Oli, had frequently been targeted. While the international fact-finding mission was in the country, its editor, Nadesapillai Vidyatharan, was followed by one of the white vans used by the death-squads. The papers offices were attacked with grenades twice in 2005.
The army and the Tamil press in conflict
The army is everywhere in Jaffna and military camps and areas off-limits to civilians dominate the outskirts of the city. Some 40,000 soldiers, 99% of them Sinhalese, are currently based in the region, which you need a military permit to enter or leave. Tens of thousands of civilians have once again had to flee their homes because of the frequent artillery exchanges between the army and the LTTE, which regularly attacks urban areas.
It is hard for the Tamil press to cover army operations. Journalists from Colombo are sometimes invited to visit the front-line, but the army makes no effort to keep the local press informed and has no spokesman or official who can answer journalists questions in Tamil. An intelligence officer told the fact-finding mission that no Tamil was willing to be an army spokesman in the district or elsewhere. This strengthens the feeling of locals, often reflected in the press, that the troops are an army of occupation.
The soldiers have no respect for Tamil journalists, said a Jaffna reporter who has fled to Colombo. First because they cant communicate with them but mainly because they see them as pro-Tamil Tiger. A young reporter on the daily Valampuri said Tamil journalists no longer dare to venture into the field with a camera or other sign of being a journalist.
The president of the North Sri Lanka Journalists Association said that since President Rajapaksas family has come to power, hostility to Tamil journalists has steadily grown, with constant pressure and violence in Jaffna. When you write about a sensitive topic, you have problems the next day.
Over the past year, army officers have summoned Tamil media chiefs at least four times to order censorship of things such as speeches by the leader of the LTTE, the students strike, kidnappings and other matters the army would prefer were not reported by journalists. This puts the Tamil media in an impossible situation because the LTTE demands they cover such topics because they are key to Tamil nationalism.
Gen. G. A. Chandrasiri, commander of the Palaly army camp, summoned a Uthayan official on 24 September last year and ordered him not to print news that showed the government and the army in a bad light. If you refuse to do this, the paper will be closed, he warned, adding that the summons must remain a secret, especially from Tamilnet. But despite threats, Uthayan is still printing criticism of the authorities.
Media officials were also summoned on 11 October by the commander of the 52nd Brigade, who asked them to stop printing news from the LTTE.
Officers of the armys Jaffna-based 512th division summoned the citys editors on 6 November to warn them not to print the message of LTTE leader Veluppillai Prabakaran on Heroes Day (27 November). Despite the risks, Uthayan eventually printed virtually all of it, while Valumpuri quoted some parts.
The army officers reportedly also criticised the editors for reporting extensively on the humanitarian crisis in the Jaffna district. But journalists have rejected these demands to stop writing that the lack of food and fuel was mainly due to the armys embargo on supplying Jaffna.
In early May this year, the army put pressure on the Jaffna media not to cover demonstrations by students protesting against the kidnapping of four of them. In June, soldiers searched the offices of Yarl Thinakural for no apparent reason.
Self-censorship increased in the Jaffna press after anti-terrorist laws came into force in December 2006. The major media in Colombo, even the English-language press, do not mention certain aspects of the civil war while the Jaffna media is careful not to report in detail on army or LTTE operations.
The Jaffna papers are defenders of Tamil nationalism, a resistance media, said a foreign observer. An official of Uthayan said: Were victims of a government that wants to crush Tamil nationalism by force. I dont see anything shocking about defending the right of Tamils to self-determination.
The army has set up a radio station, Yal FM, at the Palaly military camp to inform the population, especially about curfew times. Some of the practical information is useful for civilians but we cant accept that the SLBC national radio puts out a two-hour programme from the EPDP militia, said an official of the North Sri Lanka Journalists Association. The programme (Ithaya Weeni), produced in Colombo by pro-EPDP journalists, is broadcast in the evening and, according to one journalist, is dreadful propaganda that insults all of us.
The complicity of the army
Several independent organisations, including the International Crisis Group, have said the death-squads targeting the media are mixed teams of army intelligence and members of Tamil militias, mainly from the EPDP and the dissident Karuna faction of the LTTE. These paramilitaries, which have been incorporated in the army, have been mainly responsible in recent years for the deterioration of working conditions for journalists.
Most of the attacks have been in top-security areas where the police and army have many checkpoints and sometimes occur during the curfew. Police only make an initial on-the-spot investigation and the matter stops there.
The army allows the Tamil paramilitaries, especially the EPDP, to carry out some operations in this dirty war. The EPDP party and militia, both founded in 1987, use the protection they get from the army and the government. Its leader, Douglas Devananda, is minister of social affairs and a major target of the LTTE, which has tried to kill him a dozen times.
Devananda claims he is defending Tamils against the LTTEs authoritarianism but in fact the EPDP has committed human rights violations for more than a decade. As Reporters Without Borders noted in an earlier report, EPDP members in Jaffna were involved in the murder of journalist Mylvaganam Nimalarajan. They are also strongly suspected of being behind recent physical attacks on Uthayan.
The international fact-finding mission confirmed the presence of Tamil paramilitaries in military patrols in Jaffna. Most of the time they do interpreting and guide work but they also take part in military operations and violence against civilians.
As long as nobody is punished for the murders of journalists, there can be no trust between the Tamil media and the army, said a Tamil member of parliament from the Jaffna district. The government can say what it likes but its clearly an accomplice in the attacks.
A journalist disappears
Soldiers reportedly took part in the kidnapping on 15 February this year of journalist Subramaniam Ramachandran north of Jaffna, near Vadamaradchi. He was a reporter for the daily Yarl Thinakural and had investigated smuggling of sand involving a businessman and the army and had reported details including registration numbers of vehicles involved and links between the businessman and certain army officers. Soon afterwards his reports appeared, a judge investigated and ordered the seizure of a vehicle involved. LTTE supporters burned another vehicle used by the smugglers.
Ramachandran had been threatened by the LTTE for his good relations with the military and in November 2006 is thought to have been investigated by LTTE intelligence officials after taking photos of a rally to honour its chief, Velupillai Prabhakaran. But friends said he was no longer being threatened by the LTTE when he was kidnapped.
According to the information collected by the mission, Ramachandran left the school he ran in Karaveddy in the early evening of 15 February with a friend. Soldiers stopped them for questioning when they got as far as the Kalikai Junction military camp. His friend was allowed to leave and Ramachandran was detained. Eye-witnesses said that an hour later, a vehicle arrived with a military intelligence officer, two EPDP activists and a military informer. They left a few minutes later with Ramachandran and his family have since had no news of him.
The Jaffna office of the HRC handled the case and then passed it on to Colombo. The army, including the Jaffna district commander, was duly informed. But, as lawyer Madiyapu Remedias puts it, in such matters everyone is afraid to oppose the army, which has denied involvement.
LTTE threats
LTTE pressure is more subtle, though just as effective. The separatist movement takes criticism badly and is always quick to move against dissident voices in the Tamil community, including the media, which means pro-EPDP journalists are often targeted. Two have been murdered in the past four years.
One Tamil editor said: The reaction of the LTTE can be just as damaging for our staff, so were careful. Each word has to be weighed when we mention the LTTE and the army and we obviously never call the Tigers terrorists.
The fact-finding mission was not told in Jaffna of any direct attacks by the LTTE, but several journalists who have fled the city said the Tigers instructions about what to report were hard to ignore. LTTE intelligence agents are very active and well-informed and often summon Tamil journalists to ask for information or to provide it.
The Voice of Tigers radio station can still be heard in Jaffna district. Some people, including prominent people and journalists, say it broadcasts propaganda and is less listened to these days. People are afraid to do so, said the Bishop of Jaffna.
Silence, exile or death
The terror that still reigns in Jaffna has driven very many journalists out of the profession. Others continue working but very cautiously and stringers for national and foreign media refuse to identify themselves as such. They remember Mylvaganam Nimalarajan, the BBC World Sinhalese Service stringer and also fixer for visiting foreign journalists, who was murdered at his home one night in October 2000 by the EPDP.
A score of journalists in Jaffna have also fled the district or even the country after being threatened by paramilitaries or security forces. LTTE harassment has also forced several reporters to leave. Sri Lankan journalists have taken refuge in Switzerland, France, Britain, India and the United States.
While the fact-finding mission was in Jaffna, Jeyann Vincent, a correspondent for the Associated Press news agency, got a text-message headed Last Warning from a sat-phone and signed by the Makkal Padai (Peoples Force), which has claimed responsibility for several LTTE attacks. It said he could be killed at any time. A few hours later, the message sender called Vincent. His employers helped him get army permission to leave Jaffna the next day for Colombo. I dont know whos behind the threats, he said. It could be anyone. No side likes my coverage of the military and humanitarian situation, he told the mission.
A propaganda war
The civil war in Sri Lanka is covered in a incomplete and biased way by many Sri Lankan and foreign media. This serious lack of news, and sometimes objectivity, is mainly due to extremely difficult working conditions of journalists the affected areas.
Id thought the national and international media would be more courageous in wartime, said Jaffnas Bishop Soundaranayagam, but the journalists who come here too often arent interested in independent sources, which makes it easier for the army to implement its policy of hiding whats going on. The media should visit the north more often and talk to civilians and independent figures.
Very few national and international reporters come to Jaffna. When I have some news, I text-message my editors and they write up the article for me, said the correspondent of a national daily. Its too risky gathering details in Jaffna itself.
This absence of journalists and foreign observers on the field allows the two warring sides to wage an absurd battle of figures. When the army forced the LTTE out the eastern region of Thoppigala, the government said about 450 rebels and 20 soldiers had been killed, while the LTTE said it had lost only 60 of its fighters and killed at least 150 army soldiers.
If you add up all the armys claims of how many LTTE soldiers its killed since the start of the war, you wonder how there are any Tamils left in the whole country, said one foreign journalist. A reporter in Jaffna added: Both sides have suffered heavy losses, but neither can admit it because they dont want to demoralise their civilian supporters.
The international fact-finding mission urges the Sri Lankan government to:
* Seriously and openly investigate the murders of media workers in Jaffna, above all by creating a specialised Task Force. * Pay special attention to the safety of media workers in the areas of fighting, in particular, by training the military to respect Geneva Convention provisions regarding the protection of civilians. * Allow a UN mission to come to Sri Lanka to protect human rights. * Put a stop to public disparagement of media and journalists by government ministers and others, especially as, in the current context, these verbal attacks and threats could endanger the lives of the journalists targeted. * Amend the emergency laws and other laws that do not meet international standards on free expression.
The mission calls on all sides in the fighting to:
* End all threats to and harassment of media workers, inasmuch as they violate United Nations Security Council resolution 1738 on the protection of journalists in armed conflicts. * Put a stop to practices that restrict editorial freedom.
***05.08.2007. July report. PalestinianCenter for Development & Media Freedoms (Mada)Although declining: media freedoms violation continued in Palestinian territories during last July
Last July witnessed significant decline, in media freedoms violation in Palestinian territories, compared with the previous month, but Hamas control in the Gaza Strip still reflect the negative consequences on the situation of media institutions, in the Palestinian territories, media outlets, which were seized, closed, threatened, or stolen still stopped from broadcasting, working, printing or distributing. Caution and fear still govern a lot of journalists work, threat campaigns to journalists and media outlets continued, for example Al-Akhbar Lebanese newspaper reporter in West Bank Sami Sa?id receiving death threat on his mobile phone early in the month (July 2), and Palestinian public TV received anonymous phone call that there are bombed car, in front of the television headquarters in Ramallah, later in the month (July 28), a lot of threats between the two dates.The most positive event on media freedoms was BBC correspondent Alan Johnston release in the fourth of last month. On the other hand, the Israeli occupation forces continued their attacks on Palestinian journalists, which the most serious was, intended attempt to murder the Aqsa TV cameraman Imad Ghanem, which demonstrates not only the extent of occupying forces fribble of human life, but the wish to conceal their crimes against Palestinians, through the clear targeting of journalists. The attacks on Palestinian journalists last month extended to include Iraq, where Palestinian journalist Khalid Walid Al-Nabahani (25 years) was assassinated, by fire of unknowns.
Mada center:- Condemns all attacks on journalists, whether committed by the Israeli occupation forces, armed Palestinian groups, or Palestinian security services. - Expressing surprise at (lukewarm) reactions of the international community, to the crime targeting cameraman Imad Ghanem, by the Israeli occupation forces, which the world has seen it in live broadcast, by Aljazeera live, that will encourage Israeli occupying forces, to commit further crimes against journalists, without fear of any serious reactions. - Renews demand for Salam Fayyad government, dismissed Esmaeil Haniya government, to empower media outlets , which stopped working, or distributing, in Palestinian territories, as a result of Gaza Strip events last month, to return to work freely and safely. - Demands Hamas and Fatah leadership to instruct their members and affiliated armed groups, to cease all practices contrary to Palestinian basic law, printing and publishing law, and all international charters, which guarantees freedom of opinion and expression. - Call on media outlets, especially those controlled by Fatah and Hamas, to reconsider its media message, and to adhere to professional ethics and standards. - Demands to prosecute all those responsible for attacks on journalists, media outlets, and bring them to justice. --------------------------------- Monthly Summary Report
1. (July 2) - Aqsa TV Director in West Bank Mohammed Hassan Ishteyeh was arrested, by Palestinian security services, he was released two days later, Ishteyeh disappeared from sight, after the shooting at his office (Mass press), on 13th of last June, in Tulkarem city.2. (July 5) - Aqsa TV cameraman Imad Ghanem was seriously wounded, by Israeli occupation forces , they fired at him three times from short distance aiming to kill him, despite he was carrying camera ,when he was shot in the first time, and it presence at his side as he lay down on the ground in the following two times, during his coverage of Israeli incursion, in the Bureij refugee camp (Gaza Strip), the shooting at him prevented without colleagues attempts to transport him to the hospital for treatment, only after the withdrawal of the invading forces, his legs were amputated, as a result of the serious injuries. 3. (July 5) - Reuters and Arabiya channel crews, were fired at by Israeli occupation forces, during incursion in Maqbula area east of Bureij, which forced them to seek refuge in a house nearby, but the occupation soldiers opened fire on the house again intensively. 4. (July 6) - Al-Esteqlal (Independence) weekly newspaper, which is issued in Gaza City, sopped its printing, as a result of printing paper lack, due to the continued closure of Israeli occupation authorities, of the crossings leading to Gaza Strip.5. (July 11) - Palestine Public TV general director Mohamed Dawoudi house, located in journalists Tower in Gaza City, was raided by the executive force, they tried to arrest him but the intervention of many journalists sopped them, they confiscated his mobile phone and his car, they were returned to him the following day. Palestinian TV broadcasting from Gaza City was ceased and transferred to Ramallah, on the 14th of last June, after the takeover of Gaza Strip by Hamas , and surrounding of the channel building.6. (July 12) - Reuters photographers Ibrahim Abu Mustafa, and Bassam Masoud, Ramatan Agency cameraman Rami Abu Shamallah, were detained for short time, by executive force, in its operational headquarters located within Nasser hospital, where they were ordered to destroy clips show shoot in the air by the executive force, to disperse two demonstrations, one of Fatah and other national forces, in Khanions city.7. (July 19) - WAFA agency photographer Jihad Nakhlah, was slightly wounded by rubber bullet, fired by an Israeli occupation soldiers, during his coverage of Israeli forces raid, in Jalazon refugee camp, near Ramallah city.(July 24) - Afaq TV, in Nablus city, was raided by armed Palestinian group, where they opened fire on six computers, four television sets, and the windows and cabinets glass, which resulting in television broadcast suspension, in pretext The TV broadcast news bulletin on tape news distributed by the Palestinian News Network(PNN), accusing Fatah movement of responsibility for the events in Al-Najah University, that was the third attack in the last three months on Afaq TV, where it was attacked by a armed Palestinian group on 17th of June, and by the Israeli occupation forces on 21st of May. (July 30) - daily newspapers (Al-Hayat Al-Jadedah, Al-Ayyam, Al-Quds (published in West Bank), and seven of its distributors, in Gaza Strip , were seized for three hours, by the executive force, after entering Beit Hanoun (Eretz) crossing , on pretext that it published false news about executive force, did not publish news about its achievements, It is noteworthy that these newspapers were prevented from entering Gaze Strip during last June for 27 days, by Israeli occupation authorities, while Felesteen daily newspaper, Al-Resalah weekly newspaper published in Gaza, still had not circulated in West Bank, due to Al-Ayyam printery refusal to print the , which received threat in the 16th of last June, not to print them. Ramallah2. August.2007-------------- For further information: Mousa Rimawi-General Coordinatormadapalestine@yahoo.com
***16.07.2007. PalestinianCenter for Development & Media Freedoms (Mada): Massacre against Palestinian media at the hands of Palestinians during last June
Palestinian media had not witnessed (massacre), such as this which occurred last month, in the worst violations of the terms of their size and number, at the hands of Palestinian armed groups, represented in raiding and burning of media outlets, looting and destruction of equipment, barring from broadcasting, banning printing and distribution of newspapers, arresting journalists, threatening and shooting at them.
The intensification of conflict between Fatah and Hamas movements in recent months, especially last month, resulted in serious prejudice to freedom of opinion and expression (although officials in both movements, confirmed their commitment and keenness on media freedom, but what was happening on the ground, points to the contrary), foreign journalists have abandoned Gaza Strip, Palestinian journalists became afraid of covering events, information circulation, and publishing it, in accordance with professional standards, because that would anger one of the parties, this situation has led to the emergence of the phenomenon of the rule of fear and extreme caution among journalists, who are afraid to express their opinions freely.
It also led to the suspension of some radio stations from broadcasting such as ( Sawt Alhureya (voice of freedom) and Sawt Alshabab (voice of youth), in fear for lives of their workers, some was forced to stop broadcasting such as Sawt Alomal (voice of workers), after its headquarters was occupied by executive force , the offices of Aqsa TV in the West Bank was closed after the closure decision by PA, and printing and distribution of some newspapers was stopped in West Bank, such as Felesteen daily newspaper, which is issued in Gaza Strip, after Al-Ayyam printery received a threat not to print it , some journalists fled outside Gaza Strip, for example, Arabiya channel's correspondent Saif Al-Din Shahin, manager and the owner of Sawt Alhureya radio Majdi Arabeed, some of them disappeared from sight, others became wanted by Palestinian security services, such as Mohammed Ishtiwi Director of Aqsa TV office in West Bank (arrested on July 2 and released the next day), some media outlets asked its correspondents to be extremely cautious, fearing for their lives, Some resorted to publish news and reports without a name, others choose to sop work by themselves, or at the request of their officials, as is the case with the public media in Gaza Strip.
This grave situation has led to self-censorship enhancing among journalists, and independent media, to vertical division in local media, most of which has become affiliated either to Hamas, or emergency government appointed by Palestinian Authority, which has led to the absence of objectivity in dealing with events, few local media has maintained its neutrality.
Its Believed that most of the violations that took place in Gaza Strip were committed by armed groups of Hamas and the executive force, in West Bank by armed groups belongs to Fatah and Palestinian security services , which took the aspect of retaliation and revenge, the media outlets which had been attacked, is belonged either to Hamas or Fatah, or one of them believe it is affiliated to the other party, with exception of independent Bal Media agency office, and Sawt Alsha'b Radio (Voice of People which belong to Popular Front) in Gaza Strip, which could have been attacked for looting equipment and apparatus, as happened with Afaq TV in Nablus, some of the independent media outlets were exposed to threats and pressure, in order to promote views of two parties to the conflict, the accusation of Al-Jazeera siding with Hamas, believes that encouraged an armed group affiliated to Fatah to burn Bal Media Office in Nablus, administered by journalist Hassan Altiti, who works with Al-Jazeera also.
Many of media outlets especially radio, television stations and Electronic media news sites, which belong to Fatah and Hamas, or close to them were inciting , poured oil on the fire of differences, and turned into main tool in the conflict between the two movements in the last two years, particularly since the victory of Hamas in the legislative elections on 25th of January 2006, but it reached its peak in last month, the situation was described by Al-Hayat al-Jadidah newspaper Gaza Office Director Muneer abu Rezieq in a report published by the newspaper on June 16, 2007 as follows : ( media message for many radio stations and news& dialogue electronic sites, in addition to felesteen (Palestinian public TV) and Aqsa (Hamas TV) chandelles, reflected the nature of what is happening on the ground of fighting, each party tried to market it in media, to serve its own goals, and coverage is often far from professional or credibility).
The bloody conflict, the results sorted by it on the ground, which coincided with the attacks on journalists and the media outlets, resulted to a great and dangerous retreat in Palestinian media, which threatens of prevailing of two kinds of media, the first one
belong to Hamas or affiliated to it in Gaza Strip, and the other one belong to Fatah and the PA, or biased to it, in West Bank, which blow away all previous efforts to develop it(Palestinian media) , and will put an end to media pluralism and diversity, and the loss of its freedom, which would lead to the rule of two points of view only, This would deprive the Palestinian public to be informed about what is happening in Palestinian territories, objectively and impartially.
Mada center:
- Calls on the leadership of Fatah and Hamas movements, to instruct armed groups affiliated to them, to stop attacks on journalists and media outlets in West Bank and Gaza Strip, to restore the equipment that was confiscated from the headquarters of the various media outlets, to compensate the property which has been destroyed, estimated at millions of dollars, and enable media to work freely.
- Call on for the prosecution of all those responsible, for crimes of attacks against journalists and media outlets, and bring them to justice.
- Call on for dealing with journalists and media outlets in accordance with the law, not in accordance with the law of the jungle.
- Calls on dismissed Ismail Haneya government, and emergency government headed by Salam Fayyad, to abide by the Palestinian basic law, Printing and Publication law, and International covenants, which guarantee freedom of opinion and expression, to enable media to operate freely, without any pressure, and protect them from armed groups attacks.
- Call on journalists and media outlets to adhere to professional standards, to promote tolerance and differences resolve in Palestinian arena, by peaceful ways, and renounce violence.
- Calls on international community, to exert more pressure on the government of Israel, to stop its violations of media freedoms, the release of arrested journalists, to prosecute those responsible for crimes of attacks on journalists, and bring them to justice.
- Once again Mada welcomes the release of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston, and hopes that this will be the last kidnapping of journalists in Palestinian Territories.
Summary monthly report (June 2007)
1.(June 1) - Palestinian television women announcers, were threatened with death, by a group called (the swords of the Islamic right in the land of Rabat), on the pretext that they wear Improper clothes, in a statement which stated (we will cut off the necks of women announcers from vein to vein if necessary, to protect the spirit and moral of this nation), this threat circulated to many of them, via messages sent to their mobile phones, in the following two days, by that group.
2. (June 3) - Israeli occupation authorities, Prevented Palestinian newspapers from entering Gaza Strip until June 29. Israel is still controlling the crossings leading to Gaza Strip.
3.(June 5) - Bal Media Center in Gaza city was raided, by armed Palestinian group, they seized all its equipment and devices.
4. (June 7) - Felesteen daily newspaper office director in West Bank Walid Khalid , was transferred to administrative detention, by Salem Israeli military court, Israeli occupation forces had arrested Khalid at May 18, 2007.
5. (June 12) - Palestinian public TV transmission station, in Gaza city, was burned, after it was raided by a group belonging to the executive force in the last hour of past day, they abducted one of its workers.
6. (June 12) - Aqsa TV office in the Albireh city (next to Ramallah)was raided, by Palestinian security services, they arrest three of its staff, they are deputy office director Cameraman Mohamed Enjas, producer Joseph Musaad, montage technician Thabet Zuoraa’.
7. (June 12) - Journalist Khader Abu Kweik, from Ramatan agency, was wounded in his face, by fragments from a stray bullet during clashes between the executive force and Palestinian security forces, during his work in the agency headquarters, in Gaza City.
8. (June 13) - Sawt Alomal radio (Voice of workers) headquarters in Gaza city, was raided by the executive force, after capturing the headquarters of the Federation of Trade Unions, the radio (belong to the federation) located in the fifth floor of the headquarters ,which led to the stoppage of broadcasting.
9. (June 13) - Mass Press office in Tulkarem city , was shoot at , by armed Palestinian group, causing material damage, the owner of the office is Mohamed Ishtiwi, who is also director of Aqsa TV in West Bank, Palestinian security services tried to arrest him in the following days, but he disappeared from sight.
10. (June 13)-Al-Thuraya company for media and artistic production office in Nablus city, was raided by armed Palestinian group, they abducted six of its staff.
11. (June 13)- Watanuna Media Center, in Jabaliya refugee camp (Gaza Strip), was raided by armed Palestinian group; they seized all its devices and equipment.
12. (June 14) - Palestinian Media Group headquarters, in Gaza city, was raided by armed Palestinian group, which led to the work suspension of its Bal Media news site.
13. (June 14) - Palestinian public television headquarters in Gaza City, was raided and captured by the executive force. the sub television headquarters, located in Ramallah city has become main one on the same day, as the management of the television changed broadcasting frequencies on the same day in agreement with officials in the Nile Sat and Arab Sat, the TV start broadcasting from Ramallah city, The head of Radio and Television corporation Basim Abu Sumaya ordered its 720 employees in Gaza Strip to stop work until further notice.
14. (June 14) - Sawt Felesteen (Voice of Palestine public radio) sub-headquarters in Gaza city, was burned, by the executive force, resulting in burning all its contents (furniture, equepent and devices). The Radio main headquarters is located in Ramallah city.
15. (June 14) – Sawt Alhureya Radio headquarters, in Gaza city, was raided by armed Palestinian group, where they seized its equipment and devices, the radio workers had abandoned its headquarters the same day, which led to the stoppage of broadcasting.
16. (June 14) – Alresllah weekly newspaper copies were confiscated and burned in Ramallah city, by armed Palestinian group affiliated to Fatah, who also threatened the driver not to distribute it , as well as the printery in Ramallah not to print it . Israeli occupation authorities had prevented the newspaper, which is published in Gaza, to enter West Bank, about six years ago.
17.(June 14)- Albian press office in Salfit town(West Bank),in which Felesteen newspaper correspondent Rasha Khofach worked, was raided, by armed Palestinian group.
18. (June 14) - Felesteen newspaper correspondent Abdullah A’dawi office in Bethlehem city, was raided, by armed Palestinian group, they sabotage some of its contents.
19. (June 14) - Alnajah for Press and Media office, in Nablus city, was raided and burned, by armed Palestinian group, Dr. Farid Abu Dhair lecturer at the Department of Journalism at al-Najah National University, is the office owner.
20. (June 14) - Alruwad Press office, where Felesteen newspaper Correspondent Mukhlis Smara worked, by Palestinian armed group, they smashed its computers.
21. (June 14) - Madar Press office windows and doors, in Nablus city, were shattered, by armed Palestinians group.
22. (June 15) - Palestinian Journalists Syndicate headquarters, in Gaza City, was raided by armed Palestinian group, they seized all its properties.
23. (June 15)- Sana local TV, in Nablus city, was raided by armed Palestinian group, they smashed all transmitters, computers, and confiscating some of its contents.
24. (June 15) - Alsalam Radio for Child Care headquarters, in Qalqilya city, was raided by Palestinian armed group, they destroyed transmitters.
25. (June 15) - Jabal Alnar (Mount of fire) Radio headquarters, in Nablus city, was raided, by armed Palestinian group, they smashed the radio transmitter.
26. (June 15) - Alhayat Al-Jadidah newspaper headquarters in al-Bireh city, was raided, by Palestinian armed group, to arrest one newspaper workers in the pretext that he belonged to Hamas.
27. (June 16) – Felesteen newspaper copies (4000) were confiscated and burned, in Ramallah city, by armed Palestinian group affiliated to Fatah, who stopped the distribution car, and attacked the driver.
28.(June 16) Al-Ayyam newspaper printery(in Ramallah city) ,was threatened by unknown, not to print the Felessteen newspaper copies for West Bank, which led to the suspension of its distribution in West Bank.
29. (June 16) – Sawt Alsha'b Radio in Gaza city, was raided, by Palestinian armed group, they seized all equipment, apparatus, and furniture, which led to the stoppage of broadcasting.
30. (June 17) - Bal Media office, run by Al-Jazeera TV correspondent Hassan Altiti, located on the first floor of his house, was raided by armed Palestinian group affiliated to Fatah, they ignited it, which resulted in the burning of all its contents (cameras, transmitter devices and the furniture), some damage was caused to upper floors, as a result of the fire smoke.
31. (June 17) – Local Afaq TV in Nablus city, was raided, by armed Palestinian group, they stole computer equipment and mobile phones, the group was arrested, and the stolen property were returned back.
32. (June 18) - Felesteen newspaper correspondent Abdel Fattah Shreim office, in Qalqilya city (west Bank) was raided, by armed Palestinian group they burned it completely, and fired at him when he drove to inspect the damage to the office, he was wounded by bullet shrapnel in the head, then he was arrested by Palestinian security services, in Rafidia hospital in Nablus city, where he was transferred to receive treatment.
33. (June 20) - Albian press office in Salfit town, was raided, by armed Palestinian group, they confiscated some of its property.
34. (June 28) - Local television and radio stations in Nablus city frequencies, were transfused, by Israeli occupation forces, during storming of the old town, they broadcast a statement which appeared on local television screens as follows : (IDF-the-IDF declared a curfew in the old town from this moment until further notice, the army advise citizens not to move in this area, movement will exposes you to risk, the Army will announce to citizens the opening of the of curfew hours for the supply of food and basic materials). It is noteworthy that the occupation forces had transfused frequencies of Nablus TV on 02/25/2006, and Sawt Alnajah radio (Voice of success), for the same purpose.
35. (June 30) - Director of Alsahel press office Khaled Ma’ali was arrested, in Salfit town, by the Palestinian security services.
Last month also witnessed continuation of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston abduction, his case Witnessed dangerous developments following the escalating tension in the conflict between Hamas and the kidnappers in the last two weeks of last month, especially after the repeated threats of his kidnappers from the so-called Army of Islam to kill him, after Hamas threatened to release him by force if necessity requests, and showing him on videotape after dressing him a belt of explosives, in which he said he will be off to any attempt to free him by force.
For further information: Mousa Rimawi-General Coordinator madapalestine@yahoo.com
***06.07.2007. 2007 Live News Africa -- A Survival Guide for Journalists
The increasing number of journalists killed in Africa because of their work is a source of grave concern.
The International News Safety Institute recorded 199 journalists and support staff who have died at work in Africa between 1990 and 2006. Eighteen have died in just the first six months of this year, the worst situation since 1999.
In this context, INSI, in association with the International Federation of Journalists, today launched Live News Africa , a guide to help journalists and other news professionals anticipate danger and to reduce risk during hazardous assignments on the continent.
The 100-page manual deals with themes such as covering wars and other conflicts, disturbances and disasters, as well as coping with kidnapping, medical emergencies and post-traumatic stress.
Information in Live News Africa comes from professional safety trainers, experienced African war correspondents and trauma specialists.
“As our organisation cannot yet provide face-to-face training for all journalists in need, Live News Africa is a precious tool for news teams in dangerous areas,” said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. “Most journalists at risk around the world are not international war correspondents but natives of their own countries, working without proper training and equipment or any other protection.”
Live News Africa is a joint publication of INSI and the IFJ, supported by funding from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida).
“It’s a book that should not only be read by journalists and news staff but also by editors and all the others media managers for them to be more sensitised on the culture of safety,” said IFJ Africa Director Gabriel Baglo.
***29.06.2007. Colombia: special report – Journalists ask for protection in order to cover the justice and peace process - FLIPYS Alliance. Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa (FLIP) – Instituto Prensa y Sociedad (IPYS)
The journalists who cover the hearings of demobilized combatients of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) in Medellín, capital of the department of Antioquia, work in fear. More and more often, their work is being observed and documented for unknown purposes. They also receive messages and threatening answers during the interviews that they carry out outside the city’s administrative center where the proceedings are taking place. As well as giving rise to self-censorship among the journalists, this spiral of fear and lack of trust has started to silence the AUC victims, who had renounced their anonymity in order to demand truth and reparation.
The FLIPYS alliance - Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa (FLIP) and Instituto Prensa y Sociedad (IPYS) - is the author of this report. Please go to: www.flip.org.co, www.ipys.org, to read the whole report.
***27.06.2007. UN EXPERT ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF BBC REPORTER ALAN JOHNSTON
Ambeyi Ligabo, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression of the United Nations Human Rights Council, issued the following statement today:
The prolonged abduction of British journalist Alan Johnston, who was kidnapped in Gaza City on 12 March, is a worrying reminder of the precarious work conditions of journalists in conflict areas. I reiterate that the safety of journalists is an indispensable condition for the enjoyment of the right to freedom of expression, especially the right to impart and seek information. The role of the media in publicly denouncing violence and conflict is essential in promoting human rights worldwide.
Mr. Johnston, who works for the British Broadcasting Corporation, is a distinguished journalist, much appreciated for his objective reporting and his sympathetic approach to human suffering. I call for his immediate and peaceful release so that he can return to his family and colleagues without going through any additional suffering.
***22.06.2007. Media in Sri Lanka. Background note for International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to Sri Lanka, 18 to 23 June 2007 - Centre for Policy Alternatives (download the entire report on: www.box.net/shared/mqke32pop8)
Introduction The situation of media freedom in Sri Lanka is hardly positive. The Freedom of Expression and fundamental rights of citizens continues to erode alarmingly in an unbridled culture of impunity and violence. The undeclared, yet bloody, Eelam War IV in the North and the East of Sri Lanka has already resulted in hundreds of thousands displaced hundreds killed. In the South, claymore explosions, suicide bombs and attacks by the LTTE’s aircraft have exacerbated anxiety and fear in polity and society, eroded civil rights, dampened economic development and severely affected tourist inflows. Inflation continues to rise dramatically and there are reports of fuel rationing, power cuts and even more increases to the cost of living. Economically, politically and socially, Sri Lanka today is a powder keg of disenchantment and frustration. Regrettably, there are no signs of any course correction by the Government or the LTTE to engender a process of negotiations towards the necessary political transformation as part of a peace agreement. Without an enabling environment, the available space for any real improvement in media freedom and the rights of journalists is highly suspect. Widely noted is the dramatic decline in the safety, security of individual journalists reporting on peace and conflict, and the significant deterioration in media freedom in the country since this government assumed power in late 2005. Report after report and survey after survey, both local and international, have pointed to the dramatic erosion of media freedom, the worst since the late 80’s and even more disturbing today than it was then. It is a depressing situation for journalists – caught between the terrorism of armed groups in the North and East and the increasing State terror in the South. As a Free Media Movement (FMM) report released on World Press Freedom day in 2007 states: “Aside from serious and repeated allegations of gross violation of human rights in the North and East of Sri Lanka, the FMM is deeply concerned that the history of violence and the intolerance of diversity results in a context that is deadly for professional journalism. As noted by human rights activists, the LTTE is known to brutally suppress any dissent, and over the past year, has even gone to the extent of attempting to suppress criticism on its modus operandi by those living and writing in the diaspora and particularly in places such as Paris, London and Canada. These reports allege several instances of threats and intimidation against progressive Tamil nationalist voices. Other than guided tours, the LTTE though open to questions by journalists has consistently denied free, unhindered access to areas under its control. An iron grip on the media by these armed groups places journalists in the North and East in a Catch 22 situation – caught between the Sri Lankan military, the LTTE and the Karuna group, it is impossible to report accurately on any issue or situation on the ground without fear of violent reprisal from one or more of these actors. On this count, the FMM regretfully notes that statements in support of democracy by the Karuna group are discordant with their behaviour in the East”. Even more disturbing than the actions of armed paramilitary groups and known terrorists are those by the Government. Contrary to the assurances given to the 1st International Mission in October 2006 and in blatant violation of local and international human rights and humanitarian laws and mechanisms - repeatedly and with total impunity - Ministers of the Government, high-level advisors and others associated with those in power have openly incited hatred against media and peace activists. Calls to clarify the government’s position on hate speech and intimidatory tactics adopted and promoted by Members of Parliament and senior officials have fallen on deaf ears. Investigations into the killings of journalists are stalled, unable to continue sans the political will to bring perpetrators of heinous crimes to justice. Some journalists have been forced to flee Sri Lanka. Those who remain are in fear of their lives, working in a context wherein the Rule of Law withers in suspended animation. The situation is already untenable. Yet perversely, it is getting worse. With rights activists, including prominent media freedom activists in fear of their lives and openly branded as traitors and “Sinhala tigers” (a label that potentially carries grave consequences in the present context) the increasing and inter-related challenges to media freedom in Sri Lanka require continued pressure on all parties – State and non-State – who threaten to stymie its growth. Given the self-censorship and increasing pressures on local activists, the international community and foreign media have a key role in this regard to complement local initiatives in support of media freedom by reporting that brings out clearly the incompatibility of actions by the LTTE, this government and other armed groups with the growth of media and the strengthening of the Freedom of Expression in a democracy. Accountability is also of paramount importance – promises made by the Government, public officials and the spokespersons of armed groups and non-State actors in support of media freedom need to be made public with those who gave assurances held directly responsible for any action that undermines democratic governance and media freedom. UNESCO Director General Koichiro Matsuura stated last year that: "Free and independent media serve as a vehicle for sharing information in order to facilitate good governance, generate opportunities to gain access to essential services, promote accountability and counteract corruption, and develop the relationship between an informed, critical and participatory citizenry and responsive elected officials". It is a message all but forgotten in Sri Lanka today. Safety It must be quite clearly brought out that Tamil media in Sri Lanka is under the gravest threat. Whereas in the past these threats came from armed groups including the LTTE – not known for fostering democracy or its corollary, media freedom, in the areas under its control – today, the threat is also from the State. A pervasive culture of impunity and the rise of the Karuna faction in the East, supported by the Government, had led to the significant deterioration of safety and security for Tamil journalists. Tamil journalists, especially in the north and east, have been subject to intimidation and harassment on a daily basis by the security forces and by armed groups. Certain Tamil newspapers, particularly in the East, have been set on fire and distributors forbidden to sell them. Newspaper offices have been looted, burnt, vandalised and bombed. The increased violence and the abductions and disappearances, with total impunity, make it impossible for journalists to conduct their professional duties. The scarcity of newsprint in the Jaffna Peninsula has reduced some newspapers to publish a few copies of their paper, which they put up on the walls of the towns in the North for public consumption (…). In April 2007, Subash Chandraboas, Editor of the local magazine Nilam and contributor to other Tamil news media, was murdered in the northern town of Vavuniya, where at least 25 civilians have been killed since the start of the month. The elation of media activists at the release of the Tamil female journalist Maunasamy Parameshwaree on 20th March 2007, after 90 days of custody without any charge against her was short lived – she was abducted again and told to curtail her interactions with the media and with politicians. Incredibly, the killers of Chandraboas and the abductors of Parameshwaree are free to eviscerate democracy and media freedom at will. A disturbing culture of impunity perversely protects those who undermine the safety and security of journalists. Despite the Inspector General of Police Victor Perera’s announcement on 6th March 2007 that police had arrested over 400 persons since September 2006 on charges of abduction, including ‘ex-soldiers, serving soldiers, police officers and underworld gangs and other organised elements’, it is unclear whether the police will prosecute these offenders to the full extent of the law without political interference. As noted in The Fight Goes On: Press Freedom in South Asia 2006-2007 by the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), the open and brazen targeting of journalists and activists by those holding high public office, coupled with the culture of impunity, is a dangerous and disturbing trend which raises serious concerns for the safety of journalists. For example, the President and his government have not, to date, responded to calls by civil society to clarify whether the utterances enumerated in the text box on this page by members of his Government reflective of the de facto stance on media freedom in Sri Lanka by the State. This silence itself is damning. What follows is a partial record of the numerous threats against the safety and security of journalists in Sri Lanka by the Government, the LTTE, the Karuna faction and other armed groups that disturbingly seem to be growing apace (…). The visceral threat to media freedom in Sri Lanka is alarmingly growing in a political context that bears no responsibility, interest or capacity to secure & strengthen democratic governance. As evinced above, even the assurances given by Keheliya Rambukwella to the International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to Sri Lanka in October 2006 are severely vitiated by his own stance and perception of free media. Promises made by various other political stakeholders in Sri Lanka responsible for law & order to the contrary and in support of free media and democracy have been markedly unable to bring about the full restitution of fundamental rights and democratic governance. In such a context, and in light of the continuing intransigence of the actors aiding and abetting the deterioration of media, it is not expected that the safety of journalists and media personnel in Sri Lanka will improve significantly in the near future. Censorship A context that has given rise to growing informal censorship and self-censorship prevent the free flow of information. The Government’s politically motivated closure of the Mawbima and The Sunday Standard newspapers are a clear indication that media repression is no longer the sole domain of the LTTE or the Karuna group. Bank accounts of Sinhala language weekly Mawbima and weekend newspaper The Sunday Standard were frozen on 13th March 2007 by the government. Both newspapers, and Mawbima in particular, were critical voices that courageously exposed corruption, nepotism and bad governance without fear or favour. However, according to Thilakaratne Kuruwita Bandara and Hana Ibrahim, the Chief Editors of Mawbima and the Sunday Standard respectively in a letter addressed to the diplomatic community on 14th March 2007, the impartiality and professionalism of the newspapers increasingly incurred the wrath of the incumbent government and even the President himself. As Human Rights Watch (HRW) avers in a statement released on 12th April 2007, “The government’s moves against Mawbima are a disturbing blow to press freedom in Sri Lanka,” Zarifi said. “Increasingly, critics of government policy are being treated as traitors and enemies of the state.” The Criminal Investigations Department (CID) and the Terrorism Investigations Department (TID) have questioned many journalists, including the Editor of the Morning Leader newspaper, leading many to fear the repercussions of investigative reporting and engage in self-censorship. In a letter (dated 20 September 2006) sent to media institutions, the Ministry of Defence, Public Security, Law and Order indirectly requested the submission of all news related to national security to the Media Centre for National Security before publication, telecast or broadcast. Subsequently, as reported by noted political commentator and defence analyst Iqbal Athas in the Sunday Times on 27th May 2007, the MCNS & the LTTE’s propaganda offer hugely different version of the same incident. The net result is that the general public, especially in the South, are denied accurate and impartial reportage of events from the embattled regions in the North and East. It is not only print media that is censored. Basic communications facilities to the Jaffna Peninsula were from 28th January 2007 for a few days. Internet facilities and around 8,000 landline telephones of Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT) were rendered dysfunctional. This occurred several times over the course of 2007 and whenever there was a concerted military offensive in the North and East of Sri Lanka. Censorship, imposed by outside as well as self-censorship, is common in the North and East of Sri Lanka and exacerbates an already challenging media environment. Officers of the 512th army division on 6th November 2006, summoned to their offices in Jaffna the editors of Tamil newspapers Uthayan, Yarl Thinakural and Valampur. They told them not to publish news from the Tamil Tigers and particularly not to print a message from LTTE leader, Veluppillai Prabakaran, on ’Heroes Day’ on 27 November. According to the Jaffna-based journalists, the officers also criticised the editors about their frequent articles on the humanitarian crisis in the Jaffna peninsula. Furthermore, security forces in the East of the country did little or nothing to restore the circulation of several Tamil media after paramilitary groups effectively banned distribution of the newspapers Virakesari, Thinakural and Sudar Oli in late 2006. Para-militaries from the dissident LTTE group Karuna burned 10,000 copies of Virakesari near Batticaloa on 22nd October 20064. There is also a clear and direct link between the anti-terrorism & emergency regulations and legislation currently in operation in Sri Lanka, dealt with it in detail in the proceeding section, and the culture of censorship as it exists today in Sri Lanka (…). These incidents and more that unequivocally proved the growth of censorship and the resulting decline in media freedom made the international media activist group Reporters Without Frontiers (RSF) call Sri Lanka to be one of the world’s most dangerous countries for journalists at the end of 2006. What is more, the prevailing censorship, both imposed and selfregulated, is hugely detrimental to efforts to secure and strengthen democratic dialogue. The lack of accurate information gives rise to rumours and credence to the statements and allegations of those in power for their own parochial gain. The public remain largely ignorant of the significant deterioration of human rights and media freedom, and by extension, feel that those who do point out these inconvenient truths are speaking of a situation that simply does not exist, or is grossly exaggerated. This works to the Government’s advantage and also other armed groups – who by coercion and intimidation – control the manner in which information is reported and made available. In sum, this leads to a context in which the general public inhabit and believe in a reality markedly different to that which those in civil society fight against and are aware of. The two worlds meet violently – and as long as the public, through censorship, is denied accurate and timely information, it is difficult to think of civil society driven media strategies alone that will have the footprint and impact necessary to urgently transform the growing violence in Sri Lanka. Legislation As enumerated above, the draconian Prevention of Terrorism and Specified Terrorist Activities Regulations poses a serious threat to democratic governance and fundamental rights in Sri Lanka. Coupled with the Emergency Regulations, anti-terrorism regulations in place have already resulted in several journalists and media personnel being arrested, detained and questioned by the Police. As noted repeatedly, they have also been used by the Government to vilify, arrest and detain members of the media groups and rights activists for issuing statements against the extra‐judicial abduction of citizens and human rights abuses (…) In sum, the new emergency regulations (Emergency (Prevention and Prohibition of Terrorism and Specified Terrorist Activities) Regulations) enacted on 6th December 2006 contain several novel features, which need to be further clarified in order to meet international standards of appropriate balance between freedom of expression and its limitations on the grounds of national security and the prevention of terrorism. The absence of any such clarification to date contributed to growing concern that these regulations are used to promote censorship, exacerbate the violation of human rights and restrict the space and ability of civil society to engage in conflict transformation. Political favouritism is also the order of the day. In addition to the regressive regulations and legal frameworks above, the political establishment is open about favouritism and nepotism. In a bizarre public admission, in a speech made by President Mahinda Rajapaksa to the Executive Committee of Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) on 10th February 2007 and telecast on state controlled television station Rupavahini, he stated that he provided TV and a Radio licenses to the JVP (People's Liberation Front) as a way of recognising the support they rendered to him in the presidential election campaign. As the FMM questioned in a statement released on the 14th of February the question arises as to how many other political parties are entitled to claim a TV and Radio liaison given their support to the incumbent President and his government and went on to note that although the government admits to the provision of TV and Radio liaisons based on political favouritism, they continue to refuse licenses to establish independent community radio stations. What is more, there is, to the obvious detriment of media freedom, a marked ignorance even amongst senior politicians on legislation that’s inimical to media freedom. For example, the FMM expressed dismay at the statement made by the Leader of the Opposition Ranil Wickremasinghe, that not reporting a speech made by Minister Fernandopulle made in parliament on former President Chandrika Kumaratunge's security arrangements by the media constituted a breach of parliamentary privilege necessitating that the Editors should be summoned to parliament and called to account. That certain media institutions have felt constrained in reporting the comments of the Government Chief Whip therefore indicate not some specious breach of parliamentary privilege, but a wider challenge to freedom of expression and the independence of the media represented by the law relating to contempt of court in Sri Lanka, the FMM statement went on to say. Furthermore, and as clearly brought out in the International Mission’s report in October 2006, Emergency Regulations established on 18 August 2005 give the Government wide powers of prior restraint against the media, although these are yet to be applied. The Official Secrets Act (OSA) makes it an offence to disclose “official secrets,” which are loosely defined. In addition, the Press Council Law 1973 (PCL) prohibits the disclosure of cabinet decisions, cabinet documents, certain defence and security matters, as well as a range of fiscal issues. The Government has yet to enact a Freedom of Information Act, despite having approved a draft version of the law at a cabinet meeting in 2003. Legislation on broadcasting in the country fails to provide independence, including editorial independence, and any future public service media should reflect public service values. Although urged to set aside its interests in all media organisations and despite several committee reports reflecting this view, the Government retains control of the Associated Newspapers of Ceylon (also known as ANCL or “Lake House”). In sum, the current regulatory framework is not one that is conducive to the development of independent, professional media. With the situation in the country rapidly deteriorating, the general public are denied the quality of journalism they deserve because of a retrograde legislative framework, a repressive Government, draconian measures to quell the Freedom of Expression, a culture of impunity and a very real fear of harm to person by courageous journalists and media rights activists who continue to stay on in Sri Lanka and write and agitate on matters related to human rights, corruption, the cost of war and the growing democratic deficit. Reactions to first international mission on Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Regrettably, the report of the 1st International Press Freedom and Freedom of Expression Mission to Sri Lanka has not featured prominently in the party political discourse on media freedom in Sri Lanka. Aside from several veiled references to the reports, and that too with a mock incredulity at the serious points it raises, the Government has not addressed any of the recommendations brought out by the first report. In the interim, the situation has significant deteriorated. As enumerated above, the custodian of looking into the reports of the deterioration of the freedom of expression and media freedom, Minister Keheliya Rambukwella has himself on several occasions come out with statements grossly incompatible with media freedom in particular, and democratic governance in general. Accordingly, media initiatives to secure and strengthen basic freedoms of journalists and media personnel are without champions in Government and face a hostile public in the South. It is not context that is open for reforms. However, the continuation of things the way they are will invariably result in the further erosion of media freedom. This vicious circle can only be broken with the political will to push forward well-known reforms, including the establishment of Right to Information legislation and the transformation of State media to Public Service Media. The failure on both counts would be catastrophic. Author Sanjana Hattotuwa is a Senior Researcher at CPA working on media, peacebuilding and the potential of Information Communications Technology (ICT) and new media for conflict transformation. He can be reached at sanjana@cpalanka.org. Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) is an independent, non-partisan organization that focuses primarily on issues of governance and conflict resolution. Formed in 1996 in the firm belief that the vital contribution of civil society to the public policy debate is in need of strengthening, CPA is committed to programmes of research and advocacy through which public policy is critiqued, alternatives identified and disseminated. Address: 24/2 28th Lane, off Flower Road, Colombo 7 Telephone: +94 (11) 2565304/5/6 Fax: +94 (11) 4714460 Web www.cpalanka.org Email info@cpalanka.org
***12.06.2007. IFJ Condemns Palestinian Gunmen Posing as Journalists
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today said the use by gunmen in Gaza of a vehicle marked with the words “TV” in an attack on Israeli forces was an outrageous violation of rights that puts journalists everywhere at risk.
“Gaza is already one of the most dangerous places in the world for journalists but if combatants believe that media insignias are being used to disguise their adversaries, any journalist will become a target when there is no credibility for their identification,” said IFJ General Secretary Aidan White. “This reckless attack will put all reporting on the conflict in danger. It also reinforces the cynicism that Israeli forces and authorities display in their treatment of honest and professional Palestinian journalists.”
The IFJ is supporting a statement by its Palestinian affiliate, the Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate (PJS), which said that press vehicles should not be used by any of the parties in a conflict.
Militants on Sunday used a vehicle marked with a "TV" sign to approach Gaza's frontier border with Israel and tried to kidnap an Israel Defense Forces soldier from a position across the border.
”The use of vehicles that carry ‘Press,’ ‘TV’ or other signs… exposes journalists’ lives to danger, gives the Israeli occupation a pretext to target and kill journalists and restricts their ability to perform their professional and national duties and harm journalistic work regulated and guaranteed by international norms and law, the PJS said in a statement. “We stress our rejection of the use of media vehicles and the involvement of the press in any activity which is not related to journalism, and we demand all parties to stop using these methods.”
The IFJ and its member unions have waged an international campaign to ensure that journalists working in conflict areas are regarded as civilians who are allowed to work in combat areas without fear of being targeted. The U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 1738 in December, which says that anyone targeting journalists in a conflict could face charges of war crimes.
Gaza has been an incredibly dangerous area for both local and foreign journalists. BBC correspondent Alan Johnston has been held for three months after being abducted by gunmen on 12 March. His is the latest in a series of kidnappings in Gaza in the last year. Journalists have also been caught in the crossfire of shooting attacks between Palestinian groups and between Palestinian and Israeli forces, though none have been killed this year.
“All in all a bad situation has been made worse by this latest incident,” White said. “Now it’s time for a return to respect for journalism and democratic rights.”
***05.06.2007. Palestinian Center for Development & Media Freedoms (mada): dangerous developments in media freedoms violation in Palestinian territories during May 2007 - Two journalists and media worker were killed and Johnston abduction continue
At the time the world celebrated the International Day of Press Freedom on May 3 , the Palestinian territories witnessed a dangerous development in the attacks on journalists and media freedoms, presented by execution of economic affairs editor of Falasteen (Palestine) daily newspaper Sulaiman al-Ashi, and the administrative employee Mohamed Abdu, and journalist Essam al-Joujo from electronic news site Falasteen Mubasher (Palestine live), Since the assassination of journalist Khalil al-Zaben on 2nd of March 2004, the Palestinian territories did not witness killings of journalists, by Palestinian armed groups ( journalist Zakaria Ahmed was killed in an Israeli missile shrapnel 21/6/2006), in addition to the abduction of Abu Dhabi Channel Office Director Abdel Salam Abu Askar, Al-Resalah newspaper language editor Osama Abu Msameh, by armed Palestinian groups, such crimes represent a serious increase in the degree of violence against journalists, and very negative indicator in violation of media freedoms, which is a matter of great concern, and cast a black bloodstained, on the freedom of opinion and expression. These heinous crimes, added to the disgraceful record of the aggressors on media freedoms in Palestine, which continue day after day, in flagrant violations of the freedom of opinion and expression, taking advantage of the absence of law and the security chaos, which prevail in the Palestinian territories, especially in Gaza Strip, which witnessed a new height of reciprocal violence last month. The volume of what Felesteen newspaper journalists and workers were subjected to (the only daily published in Gaza Strip, which has been in the issuance since about one month about (3/5/2007)), indicates the obstacles and dangers which are facing journalists and workers in the Palestinian media, and constitutes a major obstacle to its development, and put many caveats in face of all who think to invest, in this vital and important sector. Mada center calls on the Palestinian Authority and government to investigate the validity of the information, reported involvement of the security services and Executive force members, of al-Ashi, Abdu, and al-Joujo killings, Abu Askar and Abu Msameh kidnapping, and to prosecute all persons responsible of attacks on journalists and media institutions, and to bring them to justice. It is noticeable that some media outlets, in Gaza Strip, particularly radio and electronic media, plays an inflammatory role, contribute to the internal situation complication, and adding oil to the fire of fighting, and conflict between Fatah and Hamas movements, therefore, Mada calling the media outlets, to respect professional standards, objectivity and impartiality, in its coverage of events, and its dissemination of information and publication. Mada center renew deep concern over the fate of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston, who was kidnapped since the 12th of last March (in spite of his appearance alive and well, in the tape distributed by the kidnappers, which was broadcast in the media), especially in light of the deteriorating security conditions in the Gaza Strip, the intensification of Israeli aggression in recent weeks, and renews its call on Palestinian authority and government to make further efforts for his release. For its part, the Israeli occupation forces have escalated their attacks, on the media freedoms last month, which the worst was the arrest of Falasteen daily newspaper Office Director in West Bank Walid Khalid, storming in five local television and radio stations and confiscation of equipment in Nablus city, and the continuing attacks on journalists and participants in peaceful demonstrations, against the construction of the apartheid wall and the confiscation of land, especially in the Blain,Um Salmoneh, Artas and Bani Naem villages, in attempt to conceal the truth, the prominent example was the shooting from very close range which does not exceed two meters and deliberately at France Press photographer, Abbas Moumni, which resulted in injuring him in his forehead. Such practices which contradict to all international laws and covenants, are committed by a State alleges, it is oasis of democracy in the Middle East. Mada center demands international humanitarian institutions to put pressure on the government of Israel to release Khaled, and all journalists detained in its prisons, and to stop violations of media freedoms, in the occupied Palestinian territories, and bring those responsible for these crimes to justice.
Monthly Summary Report
1. (May 1) - Photographer Mahfouz Abu Turk, Dubai channel photographer Nael Mansour, were beaten by Israeli occupation forces, during their coverage of Workers World Day march, near Kalandia checkpoint, north of Jerusalem. 2. (May 2) - WAFA agency photographer Saif Aldahlah, Associated Press photographer Mohamed Alblas, Aljazeera correspondent Ali Smoudi, Reuters photographer Mohammed Turkman, were subjected to run over attempt, by the driver of an Israeli military bulldozer, where he chased them twice in the narrow streets of Jenin refugee camp, during their coverage of the Israeli occupation forces camp raid, and the number of youths throwing stones at the bulldozer. 3.(May 9)- Reuters cameraman Bassam Masaud, Wafa agency photographer Yaqup Abu Ghalwah, were beaten, and their cameras were smashed , by a Khanions city family gunmen, during their coverage of the gunmen attack, on the communications company headquarters in the city. 4. (May 12) Palestinian public television correspondent in Jerusalem city, Muhammad Alsaied, was arrested at Rantis (Ramallah) checkpoint, and questioned by Israeli security forces for four hours, then released. 5. (May 13)- Editor of economic affairs in the Falasteen daily newspaper Sulaiman Abdul Rahim al-Ashi (25 years), was kidnapped and executed, and administrative employee in the newspaper Mohammad Matar Abdu (25 years old), was seriously wounded in the feet, by armed Palestinian group, who was wearing official uniforms in Gaza City. 6. (May 14) Administrative employee in Felesteen newspaper Mohammad Matar Abdu (25 years), died in Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, from wounds sustained the previous day. 7. (May 15)- Journalist Essam al-Joujo (22 years old) from electronic news site Falasteen Mubasher (Palestine live), was executed, by armed Palestinian group, after forcing him to step from his car in central Gaza City, where he was on a working mission to cover incidents of internal fighting, they shoot him ,which led to his death immediately. 8. (May 15) - Al-Resalah newspaper language editor Osama Abu Msameh, was abducted by armed Palestinian group, who was wearing official uniform, after forcing him to step from the car he was riding in Gaza City, on his way back to his house, they assault him during the interrogation, which lasted about three hours, he was moved blindfolded to a place in central Gaza, and they opened fire at his legs, left him at the scene, where he was transferred to the Shifa Hospital for treatment. 9. (May 16) - Dozens of journalists were besieged inside Shua Husari, Aljawhara, and Alshouroq towers, in Gaza City, where are located many of headquarters and offices of local, Arab and international media, such as the Ramatan news agency, Aljazeera and Alarabiya, British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), during the armed clashes between armed groups affiliated to Fatah and Hamas movements, although the journalists werent intended by siege, but their lives were at risk. Sawt Alqusds Radio broadcasting studio was partially damaged, which led to the interruption of transmission for about 12 hours. 10. (May 18)- Abu Dhabi channel office director in Gaza Strip Abdul Salam Abo Askar, was abducted by armed Palestinian group, during his return to his home on evening, in Gaza City, and taken to an unknown location, he was released safe and sound after two hours, several sources confirmed the kidnappers belong to the executive force. 11. (May 18) Falasteen newspaper office director in the West Bank Walid Khalid, was arrested by Israeli occupation authorities, after raiding his family house in Iskaka (Salfit) village. 12. (May 18) - Reuters crew in Hebron (Nayef al-Hashlamun, Haitham Obaid, Yusri al-Jamal, and Mamoon Wazwaz), were beaten by Israeli occupation forces, during the march dispersal in Bani Naim (Hebron) town, against settlers attempts to confiscate a large area of their land, journalists were attacked also, during Blain (Ramallah), Um Selmuneh (Bethlehem) demonstrations against the apartheid wall construction. 13. (May 21) - Three television stations (Gama TV, Afaq TV, Senna TV) and two radio stations (Quran al-Kareem Radio, Jabal el-Nar Radio), were stormed in, by Israeli occupation forces, broadcast equipment and archival material were confiscated from the headquarters, which led to halt of their broadcast, Nablus TV also was stormed in and a search was carried out, but has not confiscated any equipment. the occupying forces have transfusing radio waves of Nablus TV, Sawt al-Najah Radio, in Nablus city (February 25) to broadcast military statement, the following day they stormed Sanabil TV and arrested its Director Nabeg Breack, and confiscated equipment, It is noteworthy that 8 TV stations and three radio stations broadcast locally from Nablus city. 14. (May 21) - Reuters, France Press, and Maan agencies crews, were shoot at by Efrat settlement guards, south of Bethlehem, while covering protest march against the construction of the apartheid wall, the confiscation of land from the village of Artas. 15. (May 25) - France Press photographer, Abbas Moumni, was wounded in the forehead by a rubber bullet, fired by Israeli occupation soldier deliberately, during his coverage of the Blain village weekly demonstration, he was transferred to hospital in Ramallah for treatment, number of journalists were prevented from covering the demonstration, in pretext that the village was a closed military zone. Ramallah 4/6/2007 --------------------- For further information: Mousa Rimawi-General Coordinator madapalestine@yahoo.com
***01.06.2007. World Journalists Condemn ‘Intolerable Impunity’ and Vow to Show Global Solidarity in Fight to Defend Russian Journalists
Journalists from all over the world today expressed outrage and condemnation over killings of their Russian colleagues and the dark shadow of government intimidation cast over the Russian Union of Journalists (RUJ).
“There is a process of intimidation in Russia that is unacceptable,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “We must say loudly and clearly that we stand with our Russian colleagues and when we go home we must still stand shoulder to shoulder with the Russian Union of Journalists.”
Delegates at the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) World Congress vowed to fight attempts to evict the Russian Union from their premises, which was announced on the day the gathering of 500 international journalists started in Moscow for their World Congress.
Impunity in the killing of journalists and the intense pressure the government has put on the media, on unions and on individual journalists must be fought by unions, not just in Russia but all over the world, said the IFJ.
The IFJ passed a unanimous resolution that demands an immediate end to all manipulation of journalism by narrow private and political interests and called for the development of a national media culture that will respect the democratic rights and liberties of all Russians.
The problems for journalists in Russia have been complicated by the “intimidation and provocative action” of the authorities, says the IFJ, who are seeking to evict the Russian Union from the headquarters they have occupied in Moscow for 27 years.
The Congress demanded that the Russian Agency of State Property withdraws immediately the threat to evict the Union from their premises and supports the Russian Union of Journalists in its insistence that its rights of occupation are clearly set out in Government decrees and should be respected.
The IFJ unions are calling for an end to all manipulation of journalism by narrow private and political interests and for the development of a national media culture that will respect the democratic rights and liberties of all Russians.
General Secretary White said the IFJ would launch a worldwide campaign to expose the attacks on press freedom and it will be a major focus for the newly elected executive committee.
“We are not purely campaigning,” White said. “We will take this forward.”
***31.05.2007. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN MEXICO - Escalation of violence - 2006 report - Article 19
2006 has been the worst year on record for the media in Mexico. Federal and state authorities, violent groups, and drug cartels have colluded to make Mexican journalism one of the most dangerous media occupations in the world, said ARTICLE 19, CENCOS, Fundacion Manual Buendia, and the SNRP today as they launched 2006 Report, the annual assessment of press freedom in Mexico.
Emerging trends regarding the escalation of violence in Mexico have sadly been confirmed in 2006, along with the seemingly powerlessness of the authorities and an overall climate of impunity. How many more murders, attacks, intimidations, and disappearances have to take place before the government put in place effective investigatory and judicial response, and meet its international obligation to protect human rights? asked Dr. Agnes Callamard, Executive Director of ARTICLE 19.
The state is failing the Mexican journalists and the Mexican Media and is therefore failing the entire population. The intimidation of journalists, particularly through murder and physical attacks, limits the freedom of expression not only of journalists but of all citizens. Experience across the world had demonstrated that the media has a central role to play in the fight against organized crime. Journalists are killed because of what they investigate, because of what they report to the public, because of what they uncover, because of their courage and dedication to the truth and the communities they serve.
The Mexican government cannot continue to hide its ineffectiveness behind the existence of global drug cartels and drug trade. State authorities remain the main perpetrator of offences and violence against journalists. Bringing them to justice will constitute one major steps towards tackling the spiral of violence and the climate of impunity, and will send the right signal to ALL perpetrators.
Some of the report's main findings include: - Escalation of violence: 2006 saw an escalation of violence against media workers, with a total of 131 cases reported (against 93 in 2005 and 76 in 2001). Among the various cases reported, 27% were threats and acts of intimidation, 24% were physical attacks, 15% damages to property, 8% detentions, and 7% murders. - Murders: The most worrying figures concern the murders of 10 journalists, the highest figure of the last 15 years. From 2001 to 2003, 7 journalists were murdered. From 2004 to 2006, 20 were murdered, including 10 in 2006, thus being the highest figure in the last 15 years. - On location: 33% of the cases reported occurred because or when journalists were on location covering the news; 41% were linked to the contents an article or broadcasting; 13% for unknown causes; 2% linked to drug trafficking. - State: The state authorities continue to be one of the main alleged perpetrators behind the cases (41% of all cases recorded). These include: the police (24%), government employees (12%), police officials (3%) and government institutions (2%). - New perpetrators: The most worrying trend is the emergence of new perpetrators, including various armed and violent groups involved in social conflicts, such as the Popular Assembly of Oaxaca, and drug cartels. The former accounted for 15% of the total number of offences in 2006 (19 cases in total, as opposed to 5 in 2005); while drug cartels were allegedly responsible for 11% of the attacks in 2006 (14 cases). - Oaxaca: The Federal District (Mexico City) is no longer the Mexican state with the highest number of cases, replaced by the state of Oaxaca where 30% of all cases occurred. It is followed by the Federal District (15%), Chiapas (8%) and Guerrero (7%). 60% of the cases are found in only 4 states. - Impunity: Few have been brought to justice so far for these crimes and an overall climate of impunity prevails. - One timid step forward: In February 2006, the Federal government established a special unit within the Federal Prosecutor's Office which is responsible for investigating the killings of journalists. This Unit has a strong mandate and powers which, with the required political will, could see meaningful investigations initiated and strong messages against impunity delivered to both state authorities and those responsible for the crimes. As of February 2007, 108 cases had been investigated but to date, none had been closed. - Defamation: The federal chamber of deputies approved amendments to the criminal code on 18 April (already passed by the senate) recognising the right of journalists not to reveal their sources and decriminalising defamation . Early in 2007, the Senate Committee of Justice and Legislative Studies (Comisiones de Justicia y de Estudios Legislativos) endorsed the deputies position (dictamen) on this matter. But 31 states have criminal defamation on their books carrying average sentences of 2 to 4 years and exorbitant fines. - Televisa Law: In March 2006, The Chambers passed the Federal Law on Radio and Television (commonly referred to as the Televisa Law) which raises serious concerns regarding the existence of a pluralistic and independent media, public interest and community broadcasting.
NOTES TO EDITORS For an advance copy of the report embargoed until 30 May 2007: see http://www.article19.org/pdfs/publications/mexico-counting-the-costs.pdf For more information, please contact Dr. Agnes Callamard, ARTICLE 19 Executive Director, +44-2072789292 ARTICLE 19 is an independent human rights organisation that works around the world to protect and promote the right to freedom of expression. It takes its name from Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees freedom of expression
***18.05.2007. La censure sur internet progresse dans le monde entier (étude)
La censure sur internet progresse dans le monde entier (étude)
LONDRES, 18 mai 2007 (AFP) - Vingt-six pays sur les quarante étudiés dans le monde censurent l'internet, bloquant l'accès à des informations politiques, religieuses, sociales ou culturelles, a indiqué vendredi dans un rapport un groupe d'universités britanniques et nord-américaines.
"La censure sur internet progresse dans le monde entier", a indiqué John Palfrey, professeur de droit à l'université de Harvard, dans un communiqué.
"Une certaine régulation est attendue au fur et à mesure que ce media évolue, mais le filtrage et la surveillance peuvent grâvement nuire aux libertés civiles et à la vie privée, et empêcher les communications mondiales", a-t-il prévenu.
OpenNet initiative (Oni) --partenariat entre les universités britanniques d'Oxford et Cambridge, américaine de Harvard et canadienne de Toronto-- a découvert que des gouvernements d'Asie, du Proche-Orient et d'Afrique du nord empêchent leurs citoyens d'accéder à des informations jugées trop sensibles (politique, culture, sexualité, religion).
"La façon dont la censure est effectuée devient plus sophistiquée à mesure que les outils internet s'améliorent", a noté l'étude, réalisée tout au long de 2006. Plusieurs milliers de sites issus de 120 différents fournisseurs d'accès ont servi de base à l'étude.
Ainsi, au lieu de bloquer uniquement des pages de sites internet abordant les thèmes proscrits, les censeurs sont désormais en mesure de bloquer des applications entières comme YouTube, Skype et Google maps.
Ils visent également les blogs, les partis politiques, les organisations non gouvernementales locales et les individus. Le Pakistan et l'Ethiopie ont bloqué des communautés entières de blogs.
Sur les 26 pays qui censurent la toile, certains (Iran, Chine, Arabie Saoudite) bloquent une vaste gamme de thèmes mais également une grande quantité de sujets qui y sont liés tandis que d'autres ne visent qu'un thème mais sur un large spectre.
Ainsi la Corée du sud n'a qu'une cible --les sites pro-Corée du nord-- mais elle est fortement censurée.
Six pays pratiquent surtout la censure politique (Birmanie, Chine, Iran, Syrie, Tunisie et Vietnam), quatre filtrent surtout des contenus sociaux (Arabie Saoudite, Iran, Tunisie, Yemen) et cinq ciblent surtout les sites dissidents et extrémistes (Birmanie, Chine, Iran, Pakistan, Corée du sud).
Mais aucun filtrage n'a été constaté dans 14 pays où l'on pourrait pourtant s'attendre à en trouver, a noté le rapport, citant notamment l'Afghanistan, l'Egypte, l'Irak, Israël, la Malaysie, le Népal, la Russie, le Venezuela et le Zimbabwe.
"Peu d'Etats limitent leurs activités à un seul type de contenu. Une fois que le filtrage a commencé, il est appliqué à une large palette de sujets et peut être utilisée pour accroître le contrôle du cyberespace par les gouvernements", a noté Rafal Rohozinski de l'université de Cambridge.
Et l'Oni s'attend à ce que davantage de pays se mettent à censurer internet dans les prochaines années. Elle a choisi son échantillon en fonction de deux critères : les pays où les tests pouvaient être effectués (la corée du nord et Cuba n'ont pas été inclus) et où il y avait beaucoup à apprendre de la surveillance d'internet.
Ainsi, la plupart des pays d'Europe et d'Amérique du nord n'ont pas été testés.
elm/juv t
***18.05.2007 Iraqi government press restrictions have nothing to do with safety (INSI)
Brussels, 18 May - The International News Safety Institute on Thursday dismissed the Iraqi government's restrictions on new coverage of bombings as irrelevant to the safety of journalists.
According to a report on state-run Al-Iraqiyah television, an Interior Ministry spokesman said the ministry had decided to prevent news teams from approaching the scenes of incidents out of concern for their safety.
The independent newspaper Al-Mashriq quoted the spokesman, Maj. Gen Abd al-Karim Khalaf, as saying there were four reasons for the new curbs: to prevent any tampering with evidence at the site, to protect media people from the possibility of a second blast, to preserve the victims' human dignity by not showing them on TV and to avoid giving terrorists information about the results of their attacks.
News organisations and other Iraq war specialists contacted by INSI dismissed the stated justification. One senior television correspondent said the reasons given were "spurious throughout".
The following points were made: Cameramen are too busy filming bomb sites to have any time or interest in "tampering with evidence" While there is a significant danger of secondary explosions at bomb sites, camera crews now have become quite experienced in assessing the risk and deciding when it is safe to go in and film The bombers do not need TV to give them information about their attacks - they know very well what they have achieved One expert said: "It's true first responders are occasionally the target of follow-on attacks, and journalists are among the first responders. But on the basis of that argument, there should no emergency response of any kind -- silly -- halting attacks on first responders.
"What's been unspoken by Iraqi officials is the suspicion of anyone with a camera at an attack site. Since insurgents and terrorists routinely videotape their attacks, a cameraman seen at attack site soon after the attack runs the risk of being fired upon and/or detained as a suspected bad guy. Ultimately, however, in my view, this is much more of a press freedom matter than a safety issue."
Another commented: "If the government were really that concerned about the safety of journalists, it would provide better protection for the papers, magazines and TV stations that have been repeatedly targeted for attack by gunmen. The main cause of death for journalists in Baghdad has been targeted assassination, not secondary explosions at bombing sites."
INSI has recorded the deaths of 201 journalists and other news professionals since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The great majority of the victims have been Iraqis, murdered because of their work, and no one has been brought to justice.
"Whatever the reason for this latest restriction of news coverage in Iraq, it is clear it has nothing to do with the safety of journalists," said INSI Director Rodney Pinder. "The Iraqi government has a duty to protect and defend journalists, who form the cornerstone of any democracy, and this action does not address that issue in a serious way."
***10.05.2007. Iraqi Journalists and Media Launch National Safety Strategy as Death Toll Climbs
A conference of media leaders and journalists’ unions meeting in the northern Iraqi city of Irbil today called for an end to kidnappings, targeted killings and other threats to media and announced the launching of a National Safety Strategy for Media in the war-torn country.
The meeting was called by the International Federation of Journalists and its two affiliated organisations in Iraq and was attended by leading media organisations in the face of a worsening security crisis for media.
A series of kidnappings, targeted assassinations and violent attacks on media houses have seen the death toll among journalists and media staff rise to more than 200. The latest killings took place near Kirkuk earlier this week.
“Media are saying enough is enough; the killings have to stop; the risks facing journalists have to be reduced,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “The meeting agreed that media, journalists’ groups and the authorities must work together to implement a comprehensive safety strategy across the whole country.”
Earlier, the meeting called for the release of BBC journalist Alan Johnston, kidnapped two months ago in Palestine and also for fresh action to trace 14 Iraqi journalists who have been kidnapped or disappeared over the past three years.
The meeting called on the Kurdistan Syndicate of Journalists and the Iraqi Syndicate of Journalists and media organisations to establish a national Iraq Media Safety Group by the end of July. Safety offices will be opened in Baghdad and Irbil and a programme of support for media to combat safety threats will be launched.
White said the meeting provided a positive response to the worst safety crisis facing media in modern history. “Iraq is a divided country with rising violence and ferocious political rivalry, but media and journalists have found a single voice to demand an end to the killings and a co-ordinated strategy for defending media,” he said.
***06.05.2007. Media professionals from around the world adopt Medellin Declaration on Safety of Journalists and Combating Impunity
Some 200 media professionals from around the world today adopted a declaration laying the ground for a wide range of measures to improve the safety of journalists and punish crimes against them. The Medellin Declaration Securing the Safety of Journalists and Combating Impunity, came at the close of a two-day international conference on Press Freedom organized by UNESCO in the Colombian city on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day 2007.
The Declaration voices concern over attacks on freedom of the press including murder, abductions, hostage-taking, intimidation, illegal arrests and detention against journalists, media professionals and associated personnel because of their professional activities. It furthermore notes that most attacks on media professionals occur outside situations of armed conflict.
The Medellin Declaration urges States to comply with the commitments of Resolution 29 adopted by UNESCOs General Conference in 1997 to combat impunity of crimes against journalists and Resolution 1738, recently adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, regarding the status of journalists.
The link between freedom of expression and development is recognized by the Medellin Declaration. It asks UNESCO Member States to make respect for freedom of expression and fighting impunity a condition for granting of financial assistance and calls for an end to statute of limitations for crimes committed to prevent the exercise of freedom of information and expression. It also recognizes the important contribution of freedom of expression to good governance, a necessary condition for economic development.
The Declaration furthermore calls on news associations to promote actions that secure the safety of journalists including, safety training, healthcare, life insurance, and equal access to social protection for free-lance employees and full-time staff.
Press Freedom Day (3 May) celebrations and the award ceremony of the UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize were held in Colombia to mark the 10th anniversary of the creation of the Prize, named after Colombian newspaper editor Guillermo Cano. Guillermo Cano was murdered in 1986 by drug barons whose influence on Colombian society he denounced.
Anna Politkovskaya, another journalist who paid for her professional integrity with her life, was awarded this years Press Freedom Prize posthumously. Ms Politkovskaya was murdered in October 2006 in her Moscow apartment building. Her son Ilya Politkovsky was at the ceremony to receive the award, which is supported by the Cano Foundation and by the Ottaway Foundation.
As he handed over the award, the Director-General of UNESCO Koïchiro Matsuura declared that every aggression against a journalist is an attack against our fundamental freedom. These individuals who risk their lives to provide independent and reliable information deserve more than our respect and gratitude. They demand our commitment and protection.
A declaration of support by the President of Colombia, Álvaro Uribe Vélez, and an address by Colombian Justice Minister Carlos Holguín Sardi were read to the participants at the start of the ceremony. The Colombian Vice President, Francisco Santos Calderón, the Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs, Adriana Mejia, and the Mayor of Medellin, Sergio Fajardo Valderrama, later took the floor.
The Conference was co-organized by UNESCO with the Vice Presidency of Colombia and the City of Medellin.
***04.05.2007.PalestinianCenter for Development &Media Freedoms(mada) - Violations of media freedoms in the Palestinian territories during the month April 2007 - Press release: last month witnessed an escalation in violation of media freedomsin Palestinian territories
Today marks the celebration of World Press Day, as we extend our warm congratulations to all fellow journalists in Palestine and throughout the globe, we hope to prisoners and abductees journalists a prompt release, and the injured ones speedy recovery, in the hope that the coming months and years ahead remarkable improvement on media freedoms, This will enable them to do their professional duty in best conditions, without fear or concern, and happy a'id.
the Palestinian territories witnessed escalation of media freedoms violation during last month (April), compared with the previous month, It included : (April 2) - attacking Abu Dhabi Channel correspondent Mohammed al-Sawalhi, Ramatan agency photographer Adnan al-Borsh, Swatel photographer Kamel Bolbol, Qatar television cameraman Mustafa al-Bayed, member of the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate Sakher Abu A'un, Media Group photographer Wisam al-A'shi, in Gaza City, by Prime Minister bodyguards. (April 10) –raiding Radio Zien headquarters, in Jenin city, and damaging its equipment by armed Palestinian group. (April 17) –injuring: France Press photographer Mohammed al-Baba (in his left eye), Ramatan agency photographer Ashraf Kafarneh (broken finger), Ramatan agency sound technician Muhammad Shabat (bruises), German ARD TV correspondent Zakaria al-Telmis (bruising to his foot), Rafidain channel cameraman Nidal Bolbol (bruises),in Gaza city by Legislative Council Guard members. (April 21) - injuring Al-Ayyam daily columnist Ashraf al-Ajrami injury in the forehead by grenade shrapnel in Jabalia town (Gaza Strip) by armed Palestinian group.
What is dangerous in these attacks that, some were committed by legislative guards, which this institution should be the custodian of public freedoms, including freedom of opinion and expression, and the Prime Minister guards, who is supposed to implement the law, and ensures the protection of citizens, including journalists.
It is noticeable that, some Palestinian armed groups in West Bank are trying again, to imitate of what is happening in Gaza of attacks on media institutions, as happened with Radio Zien in Jenin city.
Mada center condemns these new crimes against Palestinian journalists, and the continuing abduction of Alan Johnson, and confirms that the continuing security chaos , which prevail in the Palestinian territories, reflect dark shadow over media freedoms, and provides fertile ground for its continuity, so we renew our call for Palestinian Authority and government, to implement the security plan, proposed by the Interior Ministry, which would be reflected positively on freedom of opinion and expression, and the entire life of the Palestinian people, and their just cause.
Mada center renews concern for the safety of kidnapped journalist Johnson by an armed Palestinian group, since the 12th of last March, which is a longer process abduction of a foreign journalist in Palestinian territories, This casts doubts on the seriousness of the efforts being made for his release, so we call on concerned Palestinian official institutions, to deal seriously with this issue, to secure his release safe and sound.
Israeli occupation forces have escalated violations of media freedoms in occupied Palestinian territories, which included: (April 8) - beating of Press photographer Atta A’weisat, in Hebron city. (April 12) injuring Associated Press photographer Iyad Hamad, Jerusalem Educational Television correspondent Rami Faqih, by sound bomb shrapnel in Qalandia refugee camp. (April 13) – injuring: France Press Agency photographer Abbas Moumni by rubber bullet in the right leg, Jerusalem Post newspaper photographer Ahmad Grabli by two bullets in his right leg and back, Arabiya channel cameraman Mohammed Tarifi faint as a result of inhaling tear gas vastly, and arresting Al-Jazeera cameraman Ramadan Afaneh, Ammar Awad, Reuters photographer and two Israeli journalists, for four hours, in Blain village. (April 19) - attacking Palestinian News Agency (WAFA) website, by internet hackers, they deleted Arabic, English and French files on the site. (April 20) - Dubai TV cameraman Dawoud Aqilha inhaled tear gas vastly, and injuring the British Channel 4 cameramen Musa'ad Tua'mah by rubber bullet in Blain village. (April 21) - injuring (WAFA) Agency photographer Seif el-Din al-Dahlah in the chest, in Kofur Dan village (Jenin).
It was noted that the Israeli occupation forces attacks against journalists, who participated in the coverage of the Blain weekly demonstration in April 13,were intended as it is confirmed by France press photographer Abbas Moumni, who was covering the demonstration every week, before the start of the demonstration they informed journalists, (about twenty) to leave the place, because it is closed military zone, but without showing a written order, and when the journalists refused to leave, they fired rubber bullets and tear gas canisters towards them, resulting in the injury of three journalists, then again they asked them to leave through a loudspeaker, but they refused to leave, They arrested four of them, whom were released after four hours, in the week following week, Blain declared a closed military zone, the Israeli army media spokesman called offices of foreign news agencies, and asked them not to send crews to Blain.
It is known that this procedure used by occupation forces in many cases to prevent journalists, from covering its aggressions against Palestinian citizens and their property, and it is clear that extensive press coverage of Blain demonstration is bothering them.
Mada center condemns all Israeli attacks on journalists and media institutions, confirms that the continuation of these attacks pose a threat to media freedoms, so we call on the international community to practice more pressure on government of Israel, to stop its soldiers attacks on Palestinian journalists, and to allow them, to do their professional duty in full freedom.
Mada center demands the prosecution of those responsible for attacks on journalists, in the Palestinian and Israeli sides, and to bring them to justice.
----------------------------
Monthly Summary report
(April 2) – Abu Dhabi Channel correspondent Mohammed al-Sawalhi, Ramatan agency photographer Adnan al-Borsh, Swatel photographer Kamel Bolbol, Qatar television cameraman Mustafa al-Bayed, member of Palestinian Journalists Syndicate Sakher Abu A'un, Media Group photographer Wisam al-A'shi, were attacked and beaten by Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya bodyguards, during their sit in front of prime minister headquarters in Gaza city, they were demanding the release of BBC correspondent Alan Johnson, who was kidnapped by armed Palestinians group on March 12, 2007.
(April 8) - Associated Press photographer Atta A'weisat, was attacked and beaten by Israeli occupying forces, in Hebron city south of West Bank, members of the Christian Peace Team who were present at the event has intervened to defend him, settlers tried to take his camera to destroy it, after preventing him from taking pictures near the Ibrahimi Mosque, At the same time, they allowed Israeli photographers to enter the mosque area.
(April 10) - Radio Zein headquarters in Jenin city, was raided at eleven at night, by armed Palestinian group, after storming the building headquarters, where they opened fire on the main door closure ,then on the external and internal doors closures of the headquarters, they began firing at the equipment and furniture, which resulted in the sabotage of transmission, four computers, and two mixtures, in addition to the furniture, which of the radio broadcasting was halted for several days, a group called itself (a prophet devotee Brigades), has issued a statement, claimed responsibility for the attack after three days, no one from the employees were hurt, because they were not present during the attack.
(April 12) - Associated Press photographer Iyad Hamad, Quds Educational Television correspondent Rami Al-Faqeeh, were injured by bomb shrapnel, thrown by Israeli occupation soldiers, during their dispersal of women demonstration, in Kalandia refugee camp north of Jerusalem, which was heading to the Israeli military checkpoint at the entrance of al- Ram town.
(April 13) - France Press Agency photographer Abbas Moumni was injured by rubber bullet in the right leg, Jerusalem Post newspaper photographer Ahmad Grabli was injured by two rubber bullets in his right leg and back, Mohamed Tarifi Arabiya channel cameraman faint in result of inhaling tear gas vastly, by the Israeli occupation forces, before the start of the anti-Apartheid Wall weekly demonstration, in Blain village (Ramallah), and Al-Jazeera cameraman Ramadan Afaneh, Reuters photographer Ammar Awad , two Israeli journalists were detained for four hours behind the wall.
(April 17) - two Palestinian Legislative Council guards attacked journalists which caused injuries to: France Press photographer Mohammed al-Baba (in his left eye), Ramatan agency photographer Ashraf Kafarneh (broken finger), Ramatan agency sound technician Muhammad Shabat (bruises), German ARD TV correspondent Zakaria al-Telmis (bruises in his foot), Rafidain channel cameraman Nidal Bolbol (bruises), the deputies and the Legislative Council presidency rejected to get out and listen to their demands, so dozens of Palestinian journalists tried to climb into the high courtyard of the legislative council building , the guards pushed them back, some of them fell on the ground, The journalists were staging a march, headed to the headquarters of the Legislative council in Gaza City to protest the continued abduction BBC correspondent Alan Johnson, and to call members of the Legislative Council to fulfill their duty, by pressuring the executive branch, to make further efforts for the release of Johnson.
(April 19) - Israeli internet hackers attacked, Palestinian News Agency (WAFA) website, they deleted Arabic, English and French files on the site , and wrote "ALL 4 LEBANON", and harsh words about t Hezbollah in Lebanon, statement pointed out that these repeated attacks on the site, back to being the official Palestinian "especially as its Palestine window in the news, as well as in the number of visitors reaching to nearly a quarter of a million a day". WAFA Agency site was attacked on March 1, 2007.
(April 20) - Dubai TV cameraman Dawoud Aqilah suffered from tear gas vastly inhaling, which required his treatment, the British Channel 4 photographer Musa'd Tua'ma was injured by rubber bullet in the head, he fell to the ground and lost consciousness, during Israeli occupation forces dispersal of the participants, in the weekly demonstration in Blain village, he was taken to Sha'arei Tsedek hospital in West Jerusalem, while was suffering from coma.
(April 21) – Colmunist at Al-Ayyam daily Ashraf al-Ajrami was wounded in the forehead from grenade fragments, thrown at his home direction, by armed Palestinian group, in Jabaliya town (Gaza Strip).
(April 21) - Palestinian News Agency (WAFA) photographer Seif el-Ddin al-Dahlah suffered from bruises in the chest, when Israeli occupation soldier threw a large stone at his direction, which hit him in the chest, during his coverage of the Israeli incursion into the Kofur Dan village (Jenin).
***04.05.2007 CALLING FOR RELEASE OF KIDNAPPED BBC JOURNALIST, UN OBSERVES PRESS FREEDOM DAY New York, May 3 2007 6:00PM The United Nations today marked <"http://www.un.org/events/pressday/2007/">World Press Freedom Day by calling for the release of British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) journalist Alan Johnston, who has been detained in Gaza since 12 March, and all other reporters in captivity.
“Attacks on freedom of press are attacks against international law, against humanity, against freedom itself – against everything the United Nations stands for,” Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said today. “A free, secure and independent press is among the very foundations of democracy and peace.”
He voiced his dismay of the abduction in the Palestinian Gaza Strip of BBC reporter Alan Johnston, who has been held in captivity for the past 52 days.
“I appeal again for Alan Johnston’s immediate and safe release,” he said. “No cause is served, and any cause is undermined, by his continued captivity.”
Mr. Ban also voiced alarm that in the past year, over 150 media professionals have died and many others have been injured, harassed, detained or abducted, becoming targets as they sought “to shed light on the plight of others.”
Scores of people gathered across the street from UN Headquarters in New York to rally for Mr. Johnston’s prompt release in an event organized by the BBC.
“No cause is served by Alan’s captivity,” Deputy Secretary-General Asha-Rose Migiro told the crowd of sign-waving supporters, including numerous fellow journalists who had gathered in a show of solidarity.
BBC’s world news editor Jon Williams praised his colleague’s objectivity in his reporting.
“Serious, dispassionate, impartial journalism is at a premium,” he said at the rally. “That is what Alan Johnston was doing in Gaza.”
He underscored the risks involved in reporting, and in calling for Mr. Johnston’s release said, “Alan Johnston represents the dangers facing journalists around the world.”
The head of the UN Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (<"http://www.un.org/events/pressday/2007/sg.html">UNESCO), the body that is mandated to protect freedom of expression, honoured all those journalists who have risked their lives and affirmed the significance of the role of the media.
“They understand better than anyone that media contributes significantly to processes of accountability, reconstruction and reconciliation,” UNESCO’s Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura said, adding that they also command admiration, respect and support. “Indeed, the growth in violence against journalists is telling, if tragic, testimony to the importance of the media to modern democracies.”
UNESCO’s theme for this year’s World Press Freedom Day, which was established by the UN in 1993, is the safety of journalists.
In particular, Mr. Matsuura deplored the violence perpetrated against journalists in Iraq, where 69 media professionals were killed last year alone. Since the start of the conflict in April 2003, 170 journalists, mostly local ones, have perished there.
“Never in recorded history has there been such a large-scale killing of journalists,” he noted.
Mr. Matsuura also asserted that journalists’ safety must be bolstered, urging governments to bring an end to the “pervasive culture of impunity that surrounds violence against journalists.”
General Assembly President Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa paid tribute to journalists who have been impeded in their efforts.
“Our hearts go out to all journalists who have been silenced or those whose freedom has been restricted in any way,” she said in a statement delivered on her behalf by Christian Wenaweser, the Permanent Representative of Liechtenstein.
“And to those who have paid the ultimate price, giving up their lives in pursuit of freedom of expression and greater public awareness,” she added. “Their memories will be forever etched in our hearts.”
Sheikha Haya joined the chorus demanding Mr. Johnston’s immediate and safe release. “But not just Alan Johnston, every reporter unlawfully imprisoned must be set free.”
Echoing her sentiments, the UN Staff Union also called for Mr. Johnston to be freed, highlighting the common risks both UN personnel working in to bring peace and relief and journalists endeavouring to tell their story face.
“A world where reporters and humanitarian workers cannot do their job in reasonably secure conditions is a world much less safe, transparent and free for all of us.”
The top UN human rights official lauded the courage of journalists striving to contribute to building free societies.
“In the face of these dangers, there has never been more information available to so many around the world,” said Louise Arbour, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. “This represents a vibrant tribute to the perseverance and courage of the press and workers in ‘old’ and ‘new’ media, and evidence of the unquenchable human thirst for information and knowledge.”
Governments are obliged to “respect the right of al to hold opinions without interference,” she added, regardless whether or not they “recognize that attempting to curtail the free flow of ideas is ultimately futile.”
The High Commissioner also called attention to the fact that media professionals are not only in danger in conflict zones, pointing out that journalists have been harassed, killed and intimidated by Government authorities, members of organized crime and armed groups “in countries that are nominally at peace.”
Numerous events are being held around the world marking the day, including a two-day event in Medellin, Colombia, organized by UNESCO with tributes, seminars and an award ceremony for the prestigious 2007 UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize.
To mark the tenth anniversary of the Prize, the day is being commemorated by UNESCO in Medellin, the hometown of Guillermo Cano, the newspaper publisher for whom the award is named. Mr. Cano was assassinated 20 years ago for criticizing the activities of powerful drug barons in his country.
For the first time in its 10-year history, the honour has been posthumously bestowed. Mr. Matsuura will present the award to the Illya Politkovskaya, son of the winner, Anna Politkovskaya.
Ms. Politkovskaya, esteemed Russian journalist and outspoken human rights campaigner, was murdered outside her Moscow apartment last October. Particularly well-known for her coverage of the conflict in Chechnya as a columnist for the Novaya Gazeta newspaper, her work was recognized worldwide.
At UN Headquarters, UNESCO also held discussions on issues relating to the nexus of press freedom, journalists’ safety and impunity, as well as on the role of the Internet as it pertains to free speech.
Meanwhile, in Juba, Sudan, UNESCO has joined forces with the UN Development Agency (UNDP), the Union of Journalists of Southern Sudan and others for a two-day celebration of World Press Freedom Day.
A workshop was held yesterday, in which participants conferred on the obstacles to the freedoms of the press and expression, while today a procession was held from Peace Square to the grave of John Garang, the first Vice-President and ex-southern rebel leader who died in a tragic helicopter crash in 2005.
***03.05.2007. Comunicado - Continúa la impunidad en crímenes contra periodistas - Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa, FLIP - Colombia
Años perdidos y muy pocos avances. Así podrían resumirse los resultados de las investigaciones judiciales por las violaciones a la libertad de prensa en Colombia, especialmente por los asesinatos de periodistas. Lejos de generar precedentes sobre la importancia de proteger el derecho fundamental a la información y la opinión en Colombia, las cifras muestran un panorama desalentador.
De un registro de 98 casos de homicidios de periodistas registrados entre 1992 y 2006, 22 permanecen en etapa preliminar o de investigación, mientras seis fueron suspendidos por faltas procesales o precluidos por ausencia de pruebas; dos investigaciones que comenzaron en 1999 se encuentran pendientes de sentencia desde 2002; seis fallos absolvieron a los sindicados, y tres de ellos terminaron con condenas: dos para los autores materiales y únicamente una para el autor intelectual del hecho. En el 61% de los casos, las autoridades no suministraron información sobre el proceso.
Los procesos judiciales por casos diferentes a asesinatos no arrojan ningún resultado. Violaciones a la libertad de prensa con menos impacto social que el homicidio, pero con un efecto igualmente inhibitorio para informar, pasan desapercibidas. Indicadores que van en aumento, como las amenazas, muestran una impunidad total. Frente a este escenario, grupos armados, bandas de criminales e, incluso, funcionarios públicos acuden a mensajes intimidatorios, correos electrónicos o 'regalos' macabros para silenciar sutilmente a los periodistas. Resulta claro que no les llegará reprensión judicial alguna.
Hoy tres de mayo de 2007, día mundial de libertad de prensa, la FLIP divulga un informe sobre este tema. Esta información es autoría de la FLIP. Por favor reconocerla al difundirla. www.flip.org.co, info@flip.org.co
***02.05.2007. World Press Freedom Day. Set Journalists Free on May 3rd, Says IFJ as Impunity and Kidnapping Crisis Threatens Media Freedom
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today called for World Press Freedom Day 2007 to be marked with the release of journalists in jail or taken hostage.
“This year we celebrate World Press Freedom Day at a time when more colleagues than ever are victims of ruthless hostage-taking and kidnapping,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary.
Recent high-profile kidnapping cases of foreign correspondents in Gaza, Afghanistan and Iraq have captured the media spotlight, but in fact kidnapping is a serious danger for media workers around the world, says the IFJ.
“May 3rd is a day of celebration for free expression, but we have nothing to celebrate unless our colleagues are set free,” said White, highlighting the case of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston in Gaza whose high-profile kidnapping has come to symbolise the plight of thousands of journalists and media staff who face intimidation and violence.
“Alan’s abduction has come to symbolise the plight of all journalists who face threats daily,” said White. He should be set free now and there should be an end to all such incidents in the future.”
The IFJ is also asking governments to urgently review all cases of journalists imprisoned for doing their work and to set them free warning that a culture of persecution of media only encourages targeting of reporters by extremists.
Besides Johnston, who was kidnapped by unknown men in Gaza City on 12 March, extremists kidnapped in January a Peruvian photographer working for Agence France-Presse in Gaza and held him for a week. In October, an AP photographer was abducted by Palestinian gunmen and freed later that same day. In August, two Fox News journalists were kidnapped and held for two weeks before being released.
There have also been high-profile kidnappings of reporters in Afghanistan, where Taliban extremists captured Italian journalist Daniele Mastrogiacomo and the two Afghan men working with him. The Afghan government released Taliban prisoners to secure Magistrocomo’s release but his driver, Sayed Agha, and local journalist Ajmal Naqshbandi, who was working as Mastrogiacomo’s interpreter, were brutally killed by their captors.
In Iraq, armed groups have kidnapped foreign correspondents and scores of local media. Many of the Iraqi journalists have been killed by their abductors.
In other parts of the world as well media kidnappings have also become frighteningly routine. In Sri Lanka there have been numerous abductions of journalists, and only some of them have been released. Pakistan is also well known as the site of the kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl but local media have also been the victims of similar attacks.
In Mexico, journalist Saúl Noé Martínez Ortega was found dead a week after he was kidnapped by heavily armed men in Agua Prieta, a border town close to the United States. Martínez Ortega was a police reporter for Interdiario and was reportedly investigating the disappearance of one of his sources at the time of his abduction.
“On World Press Freedom Day, we call on governments all over the world to make the protection of journalists a priority and to ensure that anyone who kidnaps a journalist is brought to justice swiftly,” White said. “Where journalists have been imprisoned for doing their work, they must be set free. Governments who persecute journalists only encourage illegal groups to target media staff.”
In particular, the IFJ says that journalists held in China, Eritrea and Ethiopia should be released.
Hong Kong reporter Ching Cheong has now spent more than two years behind bars on charges of spying against China. The IFJ is calling again on the Chinese government to release Ching and the many other Chinese journalists jailed, often on trumped-up charges, for merely carrying out their journalistic work.
Ethiopia has acquitted 8 newspaper editor and publishers but still holds at least 12 more that were rounded up following the aftermath of the 2005 general elections. All the prisoners were accused of attempted genocide and treason and faced life imprisonment or the death penalty if convicted.
In Eritrea, the government has engaged in an ongoing reign of terror against the independent press. Fifteen journalists including Swedish-Eritrean Dawit Isaac have been held in secret detention centres in Eritrea without trial for five years or more and without any contact with their families or attorneys. Ten were arrested after opposition leaders advocated for democratic reforms in 2001, stories which were widely carried by the press. Five journalists arrested before the wave of repression began in 2001.
***01.05.2007. Somali Journalists' Union Marks World Press Freedom Day amid a Welter of Violations
The freedom and safety of journalists in Somalia have come under heavy siege in the first half of 2007, as hostilities escalated in Mogadishu, with three journalists are behind the bars.
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is marking World Press Freedom Day on May 3 with an appeal to the international community to urge the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) to stop infringing journalists' rights and to respect the fundamental principles of freedom of press.
This is particularly apt since UNESCO's topics chosen for this year's World Press Freedom Day are Press Freedom, Safety of Journalists and Impunity.
Press freedom violations soared in Somalia in the period from 1 st January to 1 st May, with the NUSOJ recording 16 attacks on the press, up more than 43% on the same period in 2006.
The heavy toll was: One journalist murdered in Baidoa; two journalists injured in Mogadishu; three journalists arrested and tried in Somaliland and a fourth journalist in absentia; the operating licence withdrawn from an independent newspaper; five journalists and one media assistant arrested in Mogadishu, three of whom are still behind the bars; four journalists beaten; four media outlets attacked in Hargeisa and Mogadishu; five journalists ambushed and robbed; three media institutions briefly closed down; and unauthorised media events in Puntland banned.
Mogadishu has experienced the worst press freedom violations, with journalists being arrested and held, often without explanation. Somali journalists have been resorting to self-censorship to protect themselves.
The TFG, the regime in Somaliland, authorities in Puntland and armed groups have all perpetrated gruesome violations of media freedom. "These predators often accuse journalists and media outlets of producing biased, slanderous and inflammatory reports and of deliberately stirring up violence", said Omar Faruk Osman, Secretary General of NUSOJ.
"Violence against journalists is now routine in Somalia", he said "No predator was punished for any crime against journalists and this impunity is the main enemy of press freedom in Somalia," he added.
NUSOJ has also found that the private interests of several media owners have tainted the reputations of some media outlets, as a conflict of interest has undermined editorial independence, hindering free and fair reporting and exposing journalists to risk. In general journalists working conditions in Somalia are poor.
"We also call on the media owners to enable journalists to exercise editorial freedom and respect their work rights so that a free press can flourish and people can seek dialogue as an alternative to violence."
Press freedom is also under attack from political authorities who keep critical journalists and independent media under constant pressure.
"We are deeply disturbed by these repeated violations of press freedom and the permanent risks facing journalists in the course of their work," said Omar Faruk. "We urge the Somali authorities to end the culture of targeting journalists and media professionals with impunity".
***26.04.2007. Philippines: unbearable climate for journalists - more than 50 journalists murdered during president Gloria Arroyo's regime
A murdered radio reporter and another journalist ambushed by gunmen last week are two of the latest victims of politically motivated attacks on journalists, activists and opposition leaders in the Philippines, report the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR), International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and other press freedom groups. Most of these types of attacks go unpunished.
Carmelo Palacios, crime reporter for the government-run radio station dxRB Radyo ng Bayan, was found dead on 18 April in Nueva Ecija province, with gunshot wounds on his chin, heavy bruising on his body and a broken jaw. According to CMFR, the police officer heading the murder investigation said that Palacios must have "earned the ire of scallywag policemen and politicians," on whose crimes Palacios had reported. Palacios headed a local anti-crime group and had done a series of hard-hitting reports on the alleged misuse of funds by a congressman.
The following day, a correspondent for a leading daily newspaper was shot and wounded by two unidentified assailants. Delfin Mallari, a provincial correspondent for the Manila-based broadsheet "Philippine Daily Inquirer" ("PDI"), also the host of a local radio programme and editor of the local paper "Ang Dyaryo Natin", and co-host Johnny Glorioso of the ABS-CBN network, were ambushed by two gunmen, CMFR reports. Glorioso was not hurt in the shooting. Mallari is in stable condition after a bullet was removed from his body.
According to IFJ, Glorioso believes the attempt on Mallari's life was "politically motivated" - Mallari had received threats prior to the shooting. Both were local chapter officers of the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP), an IFJ member. Mallari has covered the police, environment, and local elections. He also wrote articles on toxic waste problems, illegal logging and the drug trade.
This is the 51st journalist murdered during President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's regime, according to IFJ. "This appalling murder is yet another tragic result of inaction from the Philippines government," IFJ says. 'The culture of impunity that has developed under Arroyo has seen these journalists' killers walk free."
According to the International Press Institute's annual press report, President Arroyo's government itself has contributed to an "unbearable climate" for journalists. CMFR reports that on 20 April, she issued an executive order that restricts public and media access to information to protect against "enemies of the state". Elsewhere, journalists are continuing to be slapped with criminal libel suits. In Cebu City, Leo Lastimosa, station manager of local ABS-CBN radio, was sued for libel by a local governor over stories that criticised the lack of transparency in government expenses. And in Albay, dzRH reporter Jun Alegre was arrested on 18 April and jailed over a 10-year-old libel case.
NUJP is calling on all their journalists to wear black on 24 April, the day of Palacio's funeral, and on 25 April, to express solidarity with journalists in Quezon who will be holding a rally and march in honour of their colleagues.
***25.04.2007. MEXICO: IFEX MEMBERS CAMPAIGN AGAINST RULING POWERS, DRUG TRAFFICKERS
The same day that Latin American members of the International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX) gathered in Mexico City to discuss how to hold the "poderes paralelos", or "ruling powers", to account for the increase in attacks on the media, a journalist was kidnapped in the northwestern part of the country. He was found murdered a week later, on 23 April, according to Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans frontières, RSF) and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
Saúl Martínez Ortega, who covered crime for the magazine "Interdiario" and wrote for the daily paper "Diaria de Agua Prieta" in Sonora, had been investigating the abduction and murder of one of his sources, a local policeman, when he himself was kidnapped by a group of armed men on 16 April.
Quoting local press accounts, CPJ says that after Martínez was chased in his car late at night, he stopped and called for help, but heavily armed gunmen forced him into their car. Investigators found bullets and 230 grams of a substance used to dilute cocaine in the reporter's abandoned SUV.
Sonora is one of the northern states of Mexico where drug traffickers have repeatedly attacked media and journalists. RSF believes the anti-drug offensive by the federal authorities is "triggering violent reprisals from traffickers."
Assassinated journalists in Latin America are often victims of drug and gang wars, reflecting how problematic organised crime is in the region. IFEX members from the region, with other local and international organisations, met on 16-17 April to assess the increasingly violent effects of illegal armed groups on free expression in their countries and to begin developing an advocacy support strategy for the region.
Members were represented from Colombia (Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa - FLIP), Peru (Instituto Prensa y Sociedad - IPYS), Honduras (Probidad) and Guatemala (Centro de Reportes Informativos sobre Guatemala - CERIGUA). The Centro de Periodismo y Etica Publica (CEPET), an IFEX interim member, represented Mexico. International members the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and ARTICLE 19 were also in attendance.
Those who want more information about the campaign should get in touch with the IFEX Campaigns Programme at: campaignsifexorg
***18.04.2007. Darfour : enquête de Reporters sans frontières sur les acteurs oubliés d’une crise
Après une mission sur place, du 17 au 22 mars, Reporters sans frontières rend public un rapport intitulé "Darfour : enquête sur les acteurs oubliés d’une crise", dans lequel l’organisation s’attache à apporter des éléments nouveaux au débat qui traverse l’opinion publique mondiale sur la tragédie que vivent les populations de l’ouest du Soudan. Une délégation de Reporters sans frontières a notamment enquêté sur la presse soudanaise qui, à l’image de la société, est active et diverse. Au Darfour même, elle s’est entretenue avec les acteurs d’une société civile bien réelle, consciente du drame qui se joue et des défis auxquels elle doit faire face. D’un pluralisme réel, les journaux paraissant à Khartoum répercutent les voix de ces militants soudanais des droits de l’homme, des chercheurs universitaires locaux et des milieux associatifs en général - des voix qui peinent pourtant à se faire entendre à l’extérieur du Soudan.
Ainsi, contrairement à l’image médiatique dominante, Reporters sans frontières estime que le Soudan n’est pas "une terre de massacres, une terra incognita dans laquelle le premier génocide du XXIe siècle se déroule au Darfour à l’abri des regards, faute de témoins étrangers pour en rendre compte et de voix soudanaises pour le dénoncer". La réalité est beaucoup moins simple et, souvent, contradictoire.
Comme nombre de conflits armés dans le monde, la crise du Darfour pose certes des problèmes de couverture complexes aux médias tant nationaux qu’internationaux. Ces problèmes intrinsèques - multiplicité de factions armées, absence de "ligne de front" et de distinction entre combattants et civils, hostilité naturelle du terrain... - sont à dessein multipliés par la "clôture bureaucratique" que les autorités de Khartoum ont érigée autour de la zone de conflit pour tenter de "réguler" et d’influencer le travail des journalistes (et dont Reporters sans frontières dresse le tableau). Ces difficultés expliquent l’image d’un pays fermé au monde où tous les massacres seraient possibles, à huis clos. En réaction à cette obstruction à leur mission, les médias internationaux ont tendance à aborder la couverture du Darfour dans un esprit de "résistance" à un gouvernement perçu comme "hostile", conclut Reporters sans frontières. Témoins des pires exactions, les journalistes étrangers risquent donc de véhiculer du Soudan une image détourée, exclusivement focalisée sur la souffrance au Darfour, sans prendre en compte les causes historiques de la crise ou les solutions proposées par la société soudanaise elle-même, dont l’existence, la diversité et l’engagement sont ignorés.
Au terme de son rapport, l’organisation recommande donc au gouvernement soudanais de prendre toutes les mesures nécessaires pour ouvrir le pays à la presse étrangère et offrir des espaces de liberté à une société civile dynamique ; aux organisations internationales de prendre en compte les réalités locales, notamment en soutenant la société civile soudanaise, et de réformer son système de communication ; et aux médias internationaux de ne pas négliger les "acteurs oubliés" de la crise, afin de présenter le Soudan dans toute sa diversité et de l’aider à faire évoluer ses contradictions internes.
***12.04.2007. BAN KI-MOON URGES IMMEDIATE, UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF MISSING BRITISH JOURNALIST
New York, Apr 12 2007 4:00PM United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon today called for the immediate and unconditional release of the British journalist Alan Johnston, who was abducted in Gaza one month ago.
“His coverage of Palestinian issues has earned a great reputation worldwide. Freedom of coverage, as well as freedom of the press, should be protected as a matter of principle,” Mr. Ban said in a statement to reporters at UN Headquarters in New York.
“I sincerely hope that those who are responsible for this abduction should release him unconditionally and immediately. I will do whatever I can in my capacity as Secretary-General. My sympathy is with the family of Mr. Alan Johnston. I wish him well.”
The Secretary-General said he was “deeply concerned” by the abduction and his call for Mr. Johnston’s immediate release comes amid similar appeals worldwide and also after a message from the head of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization last week, the body that is mandated to protect freedom of expression.
Mr. Johnston, who has been living and working for the BBC in Gaza for several years, was abducted on 12 March near his office as he was returning from the Erez crossing between Gaza and Israel.
***04.04.2007. IFJ Investigation Reveals Reporting in Pakistan "Is Now More Dangerous Than Ever"
The abduction and beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002 provided a horrific snapshot to the world of the dangers journalists face whilst reporting in Pakistan. However, while Pearl’s death made international headlines, Pakistani journalists face the harrows of life and death everyday barely noticed.
To address the sickening crisis facing the Pakistan media, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and its affiliate, the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), have released A State of Denial: The Crisis of Press Freedom and Journalist Safety in Pakistan.
This report contains the findings from a joint international media mission from February 22 to 25, 2007. Representatives of the IFJ, the PFUJ, the National Union of Journalists of UK and Ireland, Reporters Sans Frontiers (RSF), the International News Safety Institute (INSI) and an editor from the Indian media, visited Pakistan as part of a joint mission to investigate the crisis facing the media.
“From the mission’s findings, we are calling for immediate local and international action to address this terrible crisis,” said IFJ president Christopher Warren. “Reporting in Pakistan is now more dangerous than ever. Urgent action is essential to overturn the dangerous climate for journalists and to uphold press freedom and the freedom of expression in the country.”
Findings from the report reveal the increasing horror faced by Pakistani journalists, in which media restrictions, government intervention, low wages, and even violence and murder are strangling press freedom.
Nineteen journalists are believed to have been killed since 2000, with four murdered in the last year. And not only journalists, but also their families are paying an untenable price for press freedom, with two cases of the brothers of journalists murdered to send a harrowing message.
A lack of justice is creating a dangerous culture of impunity. Of the 19 cases, only Pearl’s murderers have been convicted.
“Urgent action including finding and convicting these journalist killers, implementing the legally binding wage board decisions, and the development of a culture of safety and security for journalists are imperative to uphold the IFJ motto: There can be no press freedom if journalists exist in conditions of corruption, poverty or fear,” said Warren.
“Journalists, through their collective, the PFUJ, have been leading a brave struggle against impossible odds,” Warren said.
“Not only are Pakistani journalists threatened by terrorists and rebel militants, but also those who ought to be protecting them: their own Government and media companies.”
Recommendations released in the report include:
• Immediate provision of essential safety items such as bullet-proof jackets and war insurance to journalists by the Pakistan Government and media employers as well as professional training for safety and conflict reporting.
• Wage increases to be honoured in line with the legal wage board process, and labour law reform in Pakistan, particularly ensuring media employers issue proper contracts of employment to journalists as far too many have been exploited and abused in its absence.
• The international community of media workers to recognise and assist the PFUJ in their efforts to protect the independence and security of journalism in Pakistan. This includes financial and practical support, monitoring media rights violations, and international pressure for authorities and employers to respect the rights of Pakistan journalists.
For more information contact:
Christopher Warren President, International Federation of Journalists Tel: +61 411 757 668
Chris Morley President, National Union of Journalists (UK and Ireland) Tel: +44 121 234 5286
Iqbal Khattak Bureau Chief (Peshawar), Daily Times (Pakistan) Tel: + 92 91 526 1490
***26.03.2007. UN CALLS FOR NEW MEASURES TO ‘COUNTER DECIMATION’ OF JOURNALISTS IN IRAQ
New York, Mar 26 2007 10:00AM The head of the United Nations body mandated to protect press freedom today called for new measures “to counter the decimation” of media professionals in Iraq following the murder of two more Iraqi journalists.
The body of Hamid al-Duleimi, 37, a producer of TV channel al-Nahrain was found on 19 March in the Baghdad morgue, two days after he had been abducted, while Hussein al Jaburi, the 63-year-old editor of the daily newspaper al-Safir, died on 16 March in a hospital in Amman, Jordan, from injuries sustained during an attack outside his Baghdad home on 11 February.
“Both these media professionals have paid with their lives for their courage and determination to pursue their professional commitment in a hostile environment,” UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura <"http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=37227&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html">said in a statement.
“Iraq and the world require such courage to make sure that the basic human right of freedom of expression is mobilized on the side of democracy and rule of law. I call on all parties concerned, to study new and more effective ways to investigate these crimes and bring their culprits to justice. This is vital to counter the continued decimation of media professionals in Iraq,” he added.
According to the non-governmental organizations (NGO) Reporters Without Borders, the two deaths bring to 155 the number of journalists killed in Iraq since the United States-led invasion four years ago.
Mr. Matsuura has repeatedly deplored the murder of media workers around the world.
In a related development, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (<"http://www.unama-afg.org/Index.htm">UNAMA) today called for the release of abducted journalist Ajmal Naqshbandi. “Ajmal has no connection with either Afghan or international military forces,” mission spokesman Aleem Siddique told a news briefing in Kabul, the Afghan capital.
“We once again repeat that the rights of journalists to go about their work, free from interference or harm, be recognized and respected by all. This is vital and is specifically recognised for the first time in UNAMA’s new mandate,” he added, referring to the latest Security Council resolution extending the mission. “UNAMA will continue to monitor this case closely.” 2007-03-26 00:00:00.000
***20.03.2007. MadaCenter. Media freedoms violations in the Palestinian territories during the month of February 2007 - Increase in media freedoms violation in the Palestinian territories. Offenders' being free is a threat to freedom of opinion and expression
Last February witnessed an escalation in the Israeli violations of media freedoms in the Palestinian territories, which included : arresting European press Agency EPA photographer Abdul Hafeez Al -Hashlamon in Hebron city (February 10), wounding Associated Press photographer Nasser Shiokhi in Hebron city (February 16), renewing administrative detention of journalist Jamal Farraj (February18),assaulting Al-Hayat Al-Jadida photographer Muhib Barghouthi, CNN cameraman A’dil Bardalo, Aljazeera Channel correspondent Guevara Al-Budeiri, in Blain village (February 23), wounding press photographer Atta A’uisat in Jerusalem city (February 23), transfusing Nablus TV and Al-Najah radio waves in Nablus city (February 25), preventing Press crews from covering the military campaign in Nablus city (February 25), arresting Local Sanabil TV manager Nabeg Breack in Nablus city (February 26, stopping Italian TV crew for two ours and arresting the crew cameraman Raed Helow, in Hebron city (February 27).
This rise in the number of Israeli violations in last February, compared with five violations in the previous month (January), attributable to the increase in Israeli military operations in the occupied West Bank, and the attacks on the media which accompany with these operations. What drew the attention of such violations by the Israeli army is transfusing Nablus TV and al-Najah radio waves, to serve the objectives of the military campaign in Nablus city, which is contrary to all international norms and conventions, especially the second paragraph -Article 27 of Human Rights Universal Declaration, which stipulates that (everyone has the right to protection of moral and material interests resulting from his literary, scientific or artistic production).
The violations on the Palestinian side, included : setting fire on Sawt al-Omall radio headquarter, and sabotaging its equipment in Gaza city (February 1), preventing press crews from covering the attacks on the Ministry of Agriculture building, and of the Islamic University campus (February 3), firing at Turkish news agency (Ekhlas) in Gaza city (February 3), concealing the Palestinian News Agency (WAFA) homepage on the Internet (February 5), abducting Ma’an press agency photographer Wisam Nassar for a short period of time (February 6), attacking Palestinian public television employees and the theft of the TV car in Gaza city (February 20).
The reasons for this decline of violations compared with the previous month, which amounted to 11 violations, due largely to the signing of Mecca agreement, between Fatah and Hamas movements under Saudi sponsorship, on eighth of last February, which put an end to bloody clashes between the two parties, and eased tension in the Palestinian arena, leaving the positive effects on the development of freedom of opinion and expression, as most of the violations in question occurred prior to the signing of the agreement, although it has not put an end to the disorder in the Palestinian territories, did not enhance the authority of the law until now, but we hope that the national unity government to make serious efforts, to put an end to the security chaos, and to promote the rule of law.
Mada center consider attacks on journalists, and media institutions in the Palestinian territories serious infringement of freedom of opinion and expression, guaranteed by Article 19 of the Palestinian law foundation, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Mada Center, which strongly condemns these violations, urges the international community, and human rights institutions, particularly working in the field of defending journalists, exercise more pressure on the Israeli government, to stop the attacks by members of its army, on journalists and media institutions, and bring offenders to trial, It also calls on the Palestinian Authority and government, to put an end, to the situation of insecurity prevailing in the Palestinian territories, and to ensure the protection of journalists, and to prosecute those responsible for attacks on journalists, and media institutions, and to bring them to justice, because the survival of offenders free is a threat to freedom of opinion and expression, and encourage others, to carry out further attacks on journalists.
Mada Center expresses its concern over the safety of BBC correspondent Alan Johnson, who was abducted in Gaza City on March 12, 2007, and calls again on the Palestinian Authority and the government to make maximum efforts for his release, and to work diligently to put an end to the phenomenon of abduction of journalists, and the punishment of those responsible for this crime and kidnapping crimes that preceded it.
***12.03.2007. UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF ITALIAN JOURNALIST AND COLLEAGUES
Ambeyi Ligabo, United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, issued the following statement today:
The kidnapping of Italian journalist Daniele Mastrogiacomo and his aides in Afghanistan highlights the importance of intensifying efforts to ensure the safety of journalists, especially in conflict areas. Mr. Mastrogiacomo, who works for the daily “La Repubblica”, is a distinguished journalist known for his reports from different areas torn by fighting, in which he has chronicled the tragedy of war, its root causes and dire consequences with impartiality, compassion and a great sense of professional responsibility.
The role of the media in exposing abuses of human rights and disregard for the rule of law is beyond question. Attacks on journalists prevent them from fulfilling that function. They also undermine the enjoyment of the right to freedom of expression, and of all the rights that flow from it, of whole societies.
I call for the immediate and unconditional release of Mr. Mastrogiacomo and his aides, as well as the release of all media professionals unlawfully detained around the world.
***07.03.2007 IFJ Welcomes Institute Report on Killed Journalists: “A Wake-up Call for Media and Governments”
The International Federation of Journalists today welcomed the detailed report Killing the Messenger released by the International News Safety Institute. The study provides critical analysis of a crisis of violence facing media staff over the past ten years which has claimed more than 1,000 lives.
“This report confirms the shocking reality that journalists and the people who work with them are at risk today more than ever before,” said Christopher Warren, IFJ President. “It is a wake-up call to the industry and the international political community – we must do more to find and prosecute the killers and we must act together to reduce the risks our people face.”
The IFJ says the report, which says that twice a week over the past decade a journalist or media staffer has been killed, reinforces the calls made by the United Nations Security Council in December for governments to do more to challenge impunity in the killing of journalists.
“Every journalist and every media organisation should study this report in its detail,” said Warren. “It provides clear evidence that the industry must work together to address this crisis. Every union and every employer should pledge to adopt a joint strategy to confront the threats we all face.”
One of the key recommendations of the report calls for social dialogue and media organisations and unions to work together to help build a culture of safety within the industry.
The reports says that although media attention is paid always to foreign correspondents at risk in war zones, more than three quarters of media deaths take place in regions where no open conflict exists and the vast majority of those who die are killed in their own countries.
INSI was created in 2003 on the proposal of the IFJ and the International Press Institute, which brings together media executives and employers, and the IFJ says that its work has underscored the need for co-operation to confront the safety crisis.
The IFJ will be reinforcing this message in Colombia on May 3 when, on the occasion of World Press Freedom Day, press freedom groups and media employers will be joining a special event to focus on the global safety crisis in media.
***22.02.2007. TRAUMA SELF-HELP WEBSITE LAUNCHED FOR NEWS MEDIA STAFF
This week a new self-assessment website launches providing journalists and those who work them with a confidential tool to help them determine if they are suffering the effects of post traumatic stress.
The website is designed by Dr. Anthony Feinstein, the world's foremost authority on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in journalists, and is backed by CNN.
But it is entirely independent, completely confidential and available to all media organizations and journalists around the world.
www.conflict-study.com <http://www.conflict-study.com/> provides a self-help resource for all news media professionals, even those who do not have access to a company-supported PTSD resource. One of the innovative aspects to this service is that journalists can use it while on assignment in zones of conflict.
"Research over the past six years has shown that journalists and media workers assigned front-line assignments may develop symptoms of distress due to the escalating dangers confronted," said Dr. Feinstein.
"This new web site will enable us to provide immediate feedback to those who are searching for answers and guidance as well as to broaden our understanding of how journalists are responding emotionally to these challenges."
The web-based programme will allow journalists to complete self assessments with respect to symptoms of post traumatic stress, depression, general psychological well-being and alcohol and substance use.
Immediate feedback with the option of a printout will be given to all web users. This can then be used to facilitate access to a family doctor or an Employee Assistance Program for therapy, if required. Future development of the site will include versions in different languages.
"I am personally very pleased that CNN was able to facilitate the launch of this website, and that it is available to all media workers," said Chris Cramer, managing director of CNN International.
"We operate in dangerous times and media companies need to be aware of the importance of PTSD as an area of staff welfare that needs to be addressed."
Dr. Anthony Feinstein is the world's leading authority on PTSD in journalists and is the author of "Journalists Under Fire: the Psychological Hazards of Covering War" published this year by the John Hopkins University Press. He is a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, Canada.
***12.02.2007. Newly-founded Somali Forum for Freedom of Expression Launches Website that Presents Information on Freedom of Expression
The newly established Somali Forum for Freedom of Expression (SOFFE) launches its website, www.soffeonline.org, to present information on freedom of expression violations and operate as an archive for freedom of expression issues.
The website is intended to facilitate an exchange of information between local freedom of expression groups and international freedom of expression community. Also the website was developed to organize urgent actions on matters of freedom of expression, press freedom and freedom of information violations.
The site will specifically draw attention to attacks on journalists, human rights defenders and writers. It will as well bring to light the assaults against media organizations and civil society groups.
As a result of systematic violations of people’s right to freedom of expression, intentional violence against local free expression advocacy groups in their efforts of exposing these abuses and lack of strong & allied force that is safeguarding and promoting fundamental human right of freedom of expression, media groups and civil society organisations formed Somali Forum for Freedom of Expression, SOFFE, on 22nd January 2007, at the end of a four-day Roundtable on Safeguarding and Promoting Freedom of Expression in Mogadishu,.
SOFFE, an effective network of forty media and civil society organizations, envisions safeguarding and promoting freedom of expression in southern & central Somalia , Puntland and Somaliland as stipulated by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international agreements. It was founded to coordinate combined actions for the preservation and promotion of free expression, press freedom, freedom of information and freedom of speech & opinion.
The Forum is also dedicated to link up local freedom of expression stakeholders to exchange experiences and information, and to foster ways to achieve their objectives cooperatively and constructively.
In collaboration with member organizations, SOFFE was established to monitor and highlight freedom of expression issues by disseminating the information to members and concerned bodies & persons to rally public pressure and international reaction of ending freedom of expression infringements.
Somali Forum for Freedom of Expression (SOFFE) Human Rights House Taleex Street , Hodan District Mogadishu , Somalia . Telephone: +252-1-859944/227942 E-mail: soffe@soffeonline.org soffe@globalsom.com Website: www.soffeonline.org
***11.02.2007. Informe sobre violaciones a la libertad de prensa en Colombia durante 2006
La prensa informó en medio de un clima de zozobra. Así podría resumirse el año que terminó para los medios de comunicación en Colombia. El proceso de paz con los grupos paramilitares, las elecciones parlamentarias y presidenciales, y los escándalos de corrupción fueron los grandes temas de la agenda periodística en el 2006. Y aunque el periodismo regional y nacional asumió el reto de cubrirlos, lo hizo en medio de condiciones adversas.
En el archivo adjuno encontrará el informe preliminar sobre el estado de la libertad de prensa en Colombia en 2006. www.flip.org.co, info@flip.org.co
***06.02.2007. Report of the Committee to Protect Journalists: Attacks on the Press (read the report on www.cpj.org)
New York, February 5, 2007—Journalists were killed and jailed for the work in growing numbers in 2006, the Committee to Protect Journalists reports in its new analysis of international press conditions, Attacks on the Press. Targeted assassinations from Iraq to Russia, the rise of popularly elected autocrats in Latin America, and the erosion of neutral observer status for war correspondents all threatened press freedom in 2006. Reported and written by the staff of the Committee to Protect Journalists, Attacks on the Press also details a record-setting year of violence in Iraq, where 32 journalists were killed in the line of duty. With a preface by CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Attackson the Press documents hundreds of cases of media repression in dozens of countries.
***05.02.2007. Report of The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA), Colombo (www.cpalanka.org). State of the Media 2006.
The severe erosion of media freedom in 2006 makes it one the worst years on record in terms of both the physical assaults and intimidation of the media. The media in Sri Lanka confront a challenging situation: journalists find it increasingly difficult to conduct their work, there is scant regard for media freedom and the freedom of expression on the ground and despite assurances by various armed groups, including the Sri Lankan Army, threats, harassment and intimidation against the media increase daily.
Civil society organisations such as the Free Media Movement, INFORM and the Centre for Policy Alternatives have repeatedly issued statements, often to no avail, flagging serious concerns about the increasing intolerance and hatred against journalists and media, including physical and verbal abuse, killings, abductions, acts of arson and death threats. Furthermore, accurate, impartial and responsible journalism is under severe pressure from the coercive and deeply disturbing censorship and other constraints, direct and indirect, imposed by the Government, the LTTE and the Karuna faction.
The suppression of media freedom needs be understood as a part of a wider context of violence and abuse of fundamental rights and the diminishing prospects for democracy, peace and governance in Sri Lanka in 2006. A growing cynicism with respect to the Rule of Law also contributes in large part to the increasing impunity in the country. The shrinking space for civil society coupled with the imposition of emergency regulations and new anti-terrorism regulations have contributed to a context wherein the freedom of expression and media freedom are severely curtailed. Articulating any opinion beyond or in opposition to that which is considered to be patriotic and in the interest of national security, as parochially defined by the State, carries grave consequences under these new regulations. The media suffers the brunt of the collapse of democratic governance, unable to investigate allegations of corruption, nepotism and systemic breakdowns in governance, or act as watchdogs of democracy, for fear of Government reprisals.
Although the international community (IC) issued a number of statements expressing concern and condemnation of the erosion of human rights, and international missions to Sri Lanka as well as global press freedom and advocacy organisations flagging Sri Lanka as one of the most dangerous countries in the world to work as a journalist, there is no demonstrable change in the mindset of the Government, the LTTE and the Karuna faction to secure and strengthen media freedom. Despite public pronouncements made by each party, the combined effect of the new legislation & old regulations such as the Official Secrets Act (OSA), the lack of a Right to Information framework, and the open hostility against conflict sensitive media that fosters peace and reconciliation is a heady mix that overwhelmed efforts to secure media freedom in 2006. Overview of statements and reports on media freedom The media in Sri Lanka has repeatedly been challenged, especially over the last twenty years, in maintaining its independence and acting as a watchdog. However, 2006 was an exceedingly difficult year to engage in such activities. A number of key local and international organisations that monitor and speak on behalf of media freedom pointed to the deterioration of media freedom in Sri Lanka over the course of the year.
The overarching loss of security, coupled with the anxiety of another outbreak of war and pressure from the Government not to report critically on their approach to the peace process has resulted in media self-censorship. Though the past year was pivotal in energising provincial media to support holistic media reform, it was nevertheless also one in which the continuing erosion of media freedoms on account of violence and conflict severely mitigated any progress.
In the past year or so, as the ethnic conflict has escalated and as the proponents of a military solution have gained ascendance in political arenas and in the media, an unprecedented level of hate speech are been generated and broadcast against the media and against journalists who cover the ethnic conflict in a balanced and unbiased manner. The space for dissent, or for holding diverse opinions, has shrunk and the spirit of constructive criticism of politics and politicians has almost disappeared. The high levels of polarisation in the society is reflected in the polarisation within the media and among journalists as well.
Particularly disturbing was that within this larger erosion of media freedom and human rights, Tamil journalists in particular suffered the brunt of attacks against the media. Over two dozen Tamil media workers have been abducted, directly threatened, severely assaulted or killed over the course of the year. On January 24, 2006, Subramaniyam Sugirdharajan, a Trincomalee port employee as well as a journalist was shot dead as he waited for a bus to go to work in the morning. He had published photographs and news reports critical of the army and of paramilitary groups active in Trincomalee, in the newspaper Sudaroli Oli. His photographs of the 5 students killed in Trincomalee on January 2 helped contest the original reports that they had been killed by grenades. His murder set off warning bells to other journalists to be cautious in investigative journalism and human rights reporting.
We stress that the Government must conduct complete, transparent and timely investigations into the murder of media workers and death threats issued against media workers and their families, with an end to impunity for these acts. There have also been attacks on their houses, newspaper offices and printing presses. On May 3, as journalists gathered in Colombo to celebrate Press Freedom Day, a group of unidentified men attacked the office of the Uthayan newspaper in the Northern city of Jaffna. Suresh Kumar, the Marketing Manager and Ranjith Kumar, working in the Circulation Department, were killed. 5 others were injured and the office damaged. The circulation of some Tamil newspapers has been unofficially banned in parts of the North East. In October 2006 and again in January 2007 the Karuna Group banned the circulation of Thinakural, Virakesari and Sudar Oli in Batticaloa-Amparai. Also in October 2006, the Karuna group burnt 10,000 copies of the Tamil daily newspaper Virakesari. In Jaffna there were increasing death threats against the distributors of Tamil-language newspapers. On August 1, newspaper vendor Mariathas Manojanraj was killed by a mine that was set off as he was going to Jaffna on 27 July to collect newspapers for distribution. The attack came as death threats are being made against the distributors of Tamil-language newspapers. On August 16, Sathasivam Baskaran, 44, was gunned down in his Uthayan delivery vehicle after taking advantage of the temporary lifting of an army curfew to deliver copies of the newspaper. He was shot while driving his clearlymarked vehicle in an area controlled by the Sri Lankan armed forces. This was followed by the murder of Sinnathamby Sivamaharajah, managing director of the Jaffna based Tamillanguage Namathu Eelanadu newspaper, who was shot dead on August 21, in Vellippalai. Subsequent to the murder newspaper Namathu Eelanadu publication was closed.
Sections of the Sri Lankan Army, notably the 512 Brigade based in Jaffna, summoned the Editors of 3 Jaffna dailies on 6th November 2006 and warned them against publishing any news critical of the military in Jaffna. There were also other efforts at intimidation. On September 7 2006, 6 armed men entered the premises of Uthayan and threatened its editorial committee with severe reprisals if they did not publish a statement urging Jaffna students to call off their strike.
The assault on the Tamil media over 2006 was clear: After the murder of Rohana Kumara, editor of Satana, in 2001 and till the killing of Sampath Lamkal in July 2006, every single journalist and media person murdered in Sri Lanka has been a Tamil. The majority of media persons who have been subject to intimidation in one way or the other are also Tamil. The media institutions that have been bombed, set on fire and attacked are also almost all those engaged in publishing and broadcasting in Tamil. In this environment, when presenting the various views and opinions in Tamil society becomes imperative in the search for a just and sustainable peace in Sri Lanka, the silencing of the alternate voices in Tamil society represents a slide down the path to sustained discrimination and hostility between the communities.
Accordingly, there is an urgent need to remove all unofficial and military restrictions imposed on Tamil language media and ensure the safety of the Tamil journalists. However, as the murder of Sinhalese journalist Lakmal Sampath De Silva made clear, the suppression of the media was not restricted just to the Tamil media. On July 2, freelance journalist Sampath Lakmal de Silva was shot dead by an unknown group on 2nd July 2006. He was abducted at 5:00 a.m. from his parents' home in Borallasgamuwa, south of Colombo. He was found shot dead three kilometres from his home. His mother said he went out to meet some military operatives, known to him for some time13. That these efforts were successful in intimidating journalists, who out of fear for their lives and safety, were essentially gagged from reporting accurately, impartially and responsibly, is a chilling reminder of the gravity of the situation facing free media in Sri Lanka. There were reports that journalists and editors would receive calls to question why particular stories were covered in the way that they were.
In September 2006, the Media Centre for National Security (MCNS) stated that any news gathered by your institution through your own sources with regard to national Security and defense should be subjected to clarification and confirmation from the MCNS in order to ensure that correct information is published, Telecast or Broadcast. Condemning this move, the FMM requested the MCNS to reconsider their decision to impose a regime of censorship on media and instead allow for the dissemination of information in a free and open manner14. In his address to the nation on 6th December 2006, the President provocatively asked all media to decide as to whether they were going to support a handful of terrorists or with the common man who is in the majority, stating that one could not do both15. On the 20th December 2006, two senior journalists Ranga Jayasurya (News Editor, The Sunday Observer) and Lionel Yodasinghe (Associate Editor, The Sunday Observer) - were summoned to the HQ of Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the police and questioned under the newly enacted anti-terrorism regulations.
The Presidents speech, the stance of the MCNS and the actions of the CID point to the new Emergency and anti-terrorism regulations were all extremely negative developments for freedom of expression rights in Sri Lanka. These regulations have become unofficial censorship and attempts have been made to arrest and indict journalists under these regulations. The Government should make a categorical statement that these new regulations will not be used to curb FOE rights and against journalists.
It should be noted that the freedom of expression does not exist in a vacuum and that to flourish it needs enabling environment of a healthy democracy. Given the anxiety, fear and severe threats to journalists, there is a need to secure fundamental rights for all citizens, and journalists in particular. However, as noted by the IFJ, it was not only violence, intimidation and harassment that impacted on media freedom in 2006 but also Sri Lankas domestic laws and recent Supreme Court decisions. The Courts decision with regard to the constitutionality of Sri Lankas accession to the Optional Protocol of the ICCPR and the existence of, among other laws, the Official Secrets Act of 1995, Press Council Law of 1973 and the 6th Amendment to the Constitution needs to be noted. Many more recommendations to bring Sri Lankas domestic laws in line with our commitments under the ICCPR can be found in a report released by Frederich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) in 2005.
It is not only media freedom that suffered in 2006. Freedom of expression and cultural production also took heavy blows with the Governments banning of the Hollywood movie The Da Vinci Code, the imposition of unreasonably high taxes on foreign TV programming imported by local broadcasters and the sealing of two local pay-TV (satellite) channels for alleged threats to national security (both resumed services late-2006 after a protracted legal battle that refuted allegations against them, and ironically, faced intimidations and threats even after the final verdict of the Supreme Court). Furthermore, the Cultural Ministry withdrew the initial censor board approval granted for public screening of Aksharaya (Letter of Fire), the latest feature film by internationally acclaimed film-maker Asoka Handagama, purportedly for reasons of sexual impropriety. As noted by Nalaka Gunawardene In each of these cases, bureaucratic action was preceded by a short-lived smear campaign by a small group of angry individuals or business rivals. There was no due process, and some affected individuals and companies were forced to turn to the courts - which can take months or years to hear cases - for legal redress. And bans, once imposed, are not easily withdrawn, unless ordered by courts.
The lack of due process and the authoritarian bent of the Government were also evident in the banning of the Raja FM radio station, under archaic Societal Good Conduct Act No. 37 of 1966, for anti-social and extremely repulsive and vulgar material that could corrupt the society, specially [sic] the younger generation.20 Elements of this cultural censorship in 2006, the result of a parochial interest to reign in media to toe the line with the Governments nationalist, majoritarian perspectives, bedeviled efforts to strengthen free media and severely undermined the Governments avowed commitment to the freedom of the press.
As the IFJ report points out, (i) the declining safety of journalists (ii) the partisan bias of State media and the resulting lack of professionalism (iii) the lack of public service orientation in State media in particular (iv) the lack of true, independent, community radio are, amongst others, overall indicators of the lack of any progressive, reformist media agenda of the incumbent Government. This in turn fed into the vortex of challenges to media brought about by the increasing levels of violence. Reporting conflict and peace professionally was rendered near impossible in 2006. The projection of this situation continuing into 2007 is cause for serious alarm and calls for urgent measures to secure media freedom in Sri Lanka. It seems that based on existing trends the media will face increasing challenges over 2007. There is a clear need for steps to be taken to ensure that media personnel can function in an environment free of harassment and targeted violence; restrictions on the media and media freedom are reversed; including unhindered access; the state controlled media becomes a public service media and the Freedom to Information is recognized with a review of Sri Lankas existing legislation and procedures.
Observations and Recommendations
The central challenge in Sri Lanka is to foster professional media, acting impartially & reporting accurately and responsible, with a focus on public interest and peacebuilding; and to train and equip people for carrying out this task with sensitivity and regard for facts without endangering their personal safety and security. The following observations and recommendations are noted in this regard, recalling those made by the initial report of the International Fact-Finding and Advocacy Mission to Sri Lanka, a synthesis report by CPA on media reform and the FMM / INFORM report for the Second Session of the UN Human Rights Council:
Practical steps - A full impact assessment (for instance, content analysis over time) needs to be done collectively by donors who have supported media reform initiatives. There also needs to be more donor-coordination, in part towards the development of a comprehensive strategic roadmap for media reform in Sri Lanka in collaboration media ministry, various media houses/institutions, associations and NGOs. Allow all media full and unhindered access to any area of the country from which they may wish to report Ensure that those who attack media workers and outlets are arrested and prosecuted and undertake complete, transparent and timely investigations into the murder of media workers and death threats issued against media workers and their families, with an end to impunity for these acts. Support the development and strengthening of communications strategies of NGOs & CSOs to effectively address the challenges of peacebuilding Realise the potential of new media and citizen journalism in addition to a continued emphasis on mainstream media, as mechanisms that galvanise public support and awareness of human rights, democracy and peace.
Policy measures: Review Sri Lankas present legislation, regulations, and powers and amend or revoke these in line with international standards on press freedom and freedom of expression. Recognise that freedom of information is a fundamental right for everyone in society and to enact a Freedom of Information law that meets all international standards. Take all necessary steps to turn state-controlled media into broad-based public service media, including community media Reverse action already undertaken that restricts press freedom and freedom of expression and refrain from any moves to introduce any form of direct or indirect censorship.
These recommendations are made in light of their crosscutting nature & importance across multiple sectors & actors. Seen together, they are best positioned to support a context in 2007 wherein increasing attacks against civil society and the media will pose significant challenges to peacebuilding and media reform. Overarching considerations, such as the existence of emergency regulations and anti-terrorism regulations that essentially gag free speech and media, are important to take note of in drawing up risk assessments and evaluating the impact of initiatives undertaken to support media and civil society in 2007. Noting the central importance of media to a process of peacebuilding, and aware of its role in fostering reconciliation, strengthening democracy and safeguarding human rights, the challenge of 2007 for donors is to fully support NGOs and Centre for Policy Alternatives, media institutions engaged in rights based advocacy, training and awareness raising, through innovative, long-term, programmatic funding aimed at securing professional media, stronger civil society voices and a more vibrant democracy in Sri Lanka.
***1.02.07. Reporters sans frontières publie son rapport annuel 2007 (à consulter en ligne ou télécharger sur www.rsf.org)
"Ce rapport recense les pires violations de la liberté de la presse commises dans les Etats répressifs, de la Corée du Nord à l'Erythrée, en passant par Cuba et le Turkménistan. Mais il s'intéresse également aux démocraties dans lesquelles des progrès restent à accomplir et des acquis sont menacés", a écrit Reporters sans frontières.
"Nous sommes, d'ores et déjà inquiets pour l'évolution de la situation en 2007, a ajouté l'organisation. Six journalistes et quatre collaborateurs des médias ont été tués au mois de janvier".
"Mais, au-delà de ces chiffres concernant notamment les journalistes tués ou emprisonnés, Reporters sans frontières veut tirer la sonnette d’alarme au terme d’une année 2006 marquée par le peu d’ambition, et parfois même le renoncement, des pays démocratiques à défendre les valeurs qu’ils sont censés incarner. Si tout le monde ou presque se réclame des droits de l’homme, on peut se demander, au vu des silences et des pratiques des uns et des autres, qui, aujourd’hui, a l’autorité morale requise pour incarner une défense sans complaisance de ces libertés", indique Reporters sans frontières en préambule de son rapport.
L'affaire des caricatures de Mahomet publiées au Danemark a cristallisé l'attention du monde entier sur les questions de la liberté d'expression et du respect des croyances religieuses. Là encore, les Etats démocratiques n’ont même pas assuré le service minimum à l’égard du Danemark - dont les représentations diplomatiques étaient visées - et des journalistes menacés ou arrêtés. Comme si, craignant de se brouiller avec les régimes arabes et musulmans, l’Europe notamment avait abdiqué toute volonté de se faire entendre.
Au Moyen-Orient, les journalistes ont encore payé le prix de l'instabilité chronique de la région. Au moins 65 professionnels de l'information ont été tués en Irak et les enlèvements se sont multipliés dans le pays, ainsi que dans les Territoires palestiniens. Et, malgré les promesses répétées de leurs dirigeants, les Etats du monde arabe n'ont pas connu d'avancée démocratique significative. En Amérique latine, l’assassinat de près d’une dizaine de journalistes au Mexique dans une quasi-impunité, le maintien en détention de plus d’une vingtaine de journalistes à Cuba, la dégradation de la situation en Bolivie, le pays du Sud pourtant le mieux placé jusqu’ici dans le classement établi chaque année par Reporters sans frontières, sont autant d'inquiétudes qui doivent inciter la communauté internationale à la plus grande vigilance.
Les violations de la liberté de la presse en Asie atteignent des seuils alarmants : 16 professionnels des médias ont été tués, au moins 328 interpellés, 517 agressés ou menacés et pas moins de 478 médias ont été censurés en 2006. La censure y reste un phénomène très largement répandu. Peu nombreux sont les pays d'Asie où tout peut être dit ou écrit.
Mépriser les journalistes a été la constante de nombreux Etats africains. Les gouvernements de la Corne de l'Afrique ont été les plus autoritaires envers la presse en 2006. Par ailleurs, l'impunité demeure sur le continent et les assassins de journalistes en Gambie, au Burkina Faso et en République démocratique du Congo, notamment, bénéficient toujours de la protection de gouvernements complices ou de responsables politiques tout-puissants.
Enfin, les dictatures du Web semblent être passées à la vitesse supérieure. Au moins 60 personnes sont emprisonnées pour avoir publié sur le Net des textes critiques envers les autorités. La Chine, pionnière en la matière, fait des émules : Viêt-nam, Syrie, Tunisie, Libye, Iran… les prisons pour blogueurs et autres cyberdissidents se multiplient - (RSF).
***27.01.2007. The PEC is worried by the deterioration in the Palestinian territories. Read the MadaCenter Press statement: Media freedoms violations in the Palestinian territories on the rise - 12 media freedoms violation in last December and more than 100 violations in last year
Last December did not mark any improvement of media freedoms, in the Palestinian territories, where the Israeli occupation forces, and armed Palestinian groups, have continued its assaults on journalists, in variety of methods and forms.
The Israeli occupation forces committed a series of violations including injury of Al-Arabiya channel cameraman Haitham Umari, arrest of Siraj Radio director Abdel Jabbar Abu Sneineh, raided and searched Reuters photographer Yusri al-Jamal house in Hebron, prevention of Reuters photographer Imad Bernat from entering his village Blain, extended the administrative detention journalist Assri Fayyad, isolated journalist detainee Jamal Farraj, raided the Siraj radio, and the Manbar al-Hurreya in Hebron city, and prevented the entry of newspapers and magazines to Gaza Strip.
On the Palestinian side, injured Abdel Majid Al-Khalidi and Didie Francois, during clashes between supporters of Fatah and Hamas in Gaza Strip, assault of Rafidain channel crew (Mahmoud Alian, Alaa Tafesh, Saad Ahmed) by members of the Presidential Guard in Gaza city.
What increase the gravity of these violations, is their occurred, at a time when the world celebrated the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the 10th of December, (each person has the right to freedom of opinion and expression..) Article 19, where this article was breached scandalously by the Israeli occupation authorities and armed Palestinian groups.
Mada Center expresses, strong condemnation and denunciation, of such Israeli measures and practices, calling for putting an end to them, and release Farraj, Fayyad, and Abu Sneineh, and all colleagues detainees in the Israeli prisons and detention centers, and to allow Imad Bernat mobility and freedom of movement, in harmony with article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, also condemns all Violations by armed Palestinian groups, and demand them to stop their threats against journalists, and stop the pressure exercised on them to bias to one of the parties, which constitutes a serious infringement to freedom of opinion and expression, and renewed its demand to all Palestinian sides especially Fatah and Hamas to stop bloody conflict between them, return to the language of dialogue to resolve differences, to refrain from pushing journalists in their conflicts, and respect freedom of opinion and expression, call on journalists to show objectivity, impartiality and credibility in their news coverage, also emphasizes the need to prosecute those responsible for attacks on journalists, in Palestinian and Israeli sides, and bring them to justice.
Mada center call on international society, and all human rights institutions, to double their efforts, to ensure protection for Palestinian and foreigner journalists, through exercising more pressure on the parties concerned, to respect freedom of opinion and expression.
The past year has witnessed more than 100 media freedoms violations, in the Palestinian territories, the most serious was of the martyrdom of journalist Zakariya Ahmed, after bombing his family's house in Khanions city, by rocket from an Israeli warplane (June 21), and the injury of many journalists some of them was seriously such as : injury of journalist Mohamed Za'noun in the Israeli shelling of a road the al-Mentar crossing in Gaza Strip (July 8th), Ibrahim Otli, by an Israeli missile shrapnel in Gaza City (July 26), injury of journalist Osama Sallouadi by a bullet fired randomly by one of the members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Battalions, in the city of Ramallah (7 / 10), injury of journalist Hamza Al-Attar, shot by an Israeli soldier in Beit Hanoun (2 / 11), also two foreign journalists were injured moderately :the Japanese Otto Sake by Israeli forces in Beit Hanoun (July 16) and the French Didie François during the clashes between supporters of Hamas and Fatah in Gaza City (17 / 12).
Six foreign journalists and a Palestinian journalist were kidnapped by Palestinian armed groups They : two Frenchmen, Caroline Laurent and Alfred YaqubZadah, the South Korean Yong Ta-young (March 14), the American Steve Centanni and the New Zealand Olaf Wiige (August 14), Spaniard Emilio Morinati (24 / 10), and the Palestinian Saleem Abu Amr (September 25), the good thing is none of them had been subjected to harm and were released unharmed, but the disturbing thing is ,those responsible for the crimes of kidnapping and the attacks on journalists and media organizations has not been prosecuted, and brought for trial and punishment in the Israeli and Palestinian sides.
We were hoping and still continue to be, the current year to be better than precedent, but that kidnapping of France Press Agency photographer Jamie Razori by Palestinian armed group, in the first day of the current year, which we welcome his release after seven days of his abduction, and injuring Fadi Alaruri severely, on the fourth of the current month, by Israeli occupation forces, does not bode stopping of Israeli and Palestinian attacks on journalists,
The continuation of Israel direct occupation in West Bank, and indirect of Gaza Strip, and the growing of security chaos, opens an opportunity in front of the continuation of media freedoms violation, Occupation and security chaos, considered the main reasons for the continued violation of media freedoms in Palestinian territories.
***23.01.2007. UN EXPERT ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CONCERNED OVER MURDER OF JOURNALIST IN TURKEY. Ambeyi Ligabo, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, issued the following statement today:
The Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Ambeyi Ligabo, expressed his deep concern over the murder of Hrant Dink, a respected journalist and intellectual, known for his critical work on a specific period of the history of Turkey. In his forthcoming report to the fourth session of the Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur stresses that the exercise of freedom of speech should always be guaranteed for the consideration of historical events. Most unfortunately, extreme polarization of views, in conjunction with a perverted sense of national identity, has again inspired the accomplishment of an ominous act, which has curtailed the practicability of debating, in a tolerant and open manner, a subject of wide general interest. Safety of media workers remains one of the core issues to ensure the full exercise of the right to freedom of expression, a key component of all democratic societies. Governments and state institutions have the primary responsibility of ensuring the safety and security of citizens, including journalists and other media professionals. In this connection, the Special Rapporteur is encouraged by the prompt reaction of the Government of Turkey, and hopes that investigations will shed light on all aspects of this heinous crime.
***20.01.2007. Freedom House report 2007. Freedom in the World 2007: Year Marked by Global "Freedom Stagnation," Setbacks for Democracy in Asia
Washington, D.C.,January 17, 2007 The year 2006 saw little change in the global state of freedom in the world and the emergence of a series of worrisome trends that present potentially serious threats to the expansion of freedom in the future, Freedom House said in a major survey of global freedom released today.
Freedom in the World 2007, a survey of worldwide political rights and civil liberties, found that the percentage of countries designated as Free has remained flat for nearly a decade and suggests that a “freedom stagnation” may be developing.
The continued weakness of democratic institutions—even after holding democratic elections—in a number of countries continues to hamper further progress. “Although the past 30 years have seen significant gains for political freedom around the world, the number of Free countries has remained largely unchanged since the high point in 1998. Our assessment points to a freedom stagnation that has developed in the last decade,” said Jennifer Windsor, Executive Director of Freedom House, “and should lead to renewed policy attention to addressing the obstacles that are preventing further progress.”
Regionally, major findings include a setback for freedom in a number of countries in the Asia-Pacific region, a more modest decline in Africa, and a solidification of authoritarian rule in the majority of countries of the former Soviet Union. Three countries experienced positive status changes: Guyana moved from Partly Free to Free, and Haiti and Nepal moved from Not Free to Partly Free. Two countries experienced negative status changes: both Thailand and Congo (Brazzaville) moved from Partly Free to Not Free.
Freedom House also noted that the trends reflected the growing pushback against democracy driven by authoritarian regimes, including Russia, Venezuela, China, Iran, and Zimbabwe, threatening to further erode the gains made in the last thirty years. The pushback is targeted at organizations, movements, and media that advocate for the expansion of democratic freedoms.
Complete survey results reflect global events during 2006. A package of charts and graphs and an explanatory essay are available online.
On a global scale, the state of freedom in 2006 showed a modest decline from that of 2005. The number of countries that experienced negative changes in freedom without meriting a status change outweighed those that received positive changes: the scores for 33 countries declined, while only 18 improved.
According to the survey, the number of countries judged by Freedom in the World as Free in 2006 stood at 90, representing 47 percent of the global population. Fifty-eight countries qualified as Partly Free, with 30 percent of the world’s population. The survey finds that 45 countries are Not Free, representing 23 percent of the world’s inhabitants. About one-half of those living in Not Free conditions inhabit one country: China.
Several of the countries that showed declines during the year were already ranked among the world’s most repressive states: Burma, Zimbabwe, Somalia, Eritrea and Iran. Yet declines were also noted in a number of countries rated Free or Partly Free, but whose democratic institutions remain unformed or fragile, as well as in societies that had previously demonstrated a strong measure of democratic stability: South Africa, Kenya, Taiwan, Philippines, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil and Hungary.
“While the past year was not a good year for freedom, the trend over the past decade is even more disturbing,” said Arch Puddington, director of research at Freedom House. “Not only have we failed to make significant breakthroughs, but we have seen the emergence of authoritarian regimes—Russia, Venezuela, and Iran are good examples—that are aggressively hostile to democracy, are determined to crush all domestic advocates for freedom, and stand as models for democracy’s adversaries everywhere.”
The survey detected a number of trends that affected many countries across regions. These included a decline in freedom of expression and freedom of the press, a weakness in the rule of law, and pervasive corruption and a lack of government transparency.
Regionally, Asia experienced the largest proportion of lowered scores in 2006. While the dominant development was the military-led coup that ousted Thailand’s democratically elected prime minister, other countries previously considered showcases of Asian freedom, including the Philippines and East Timor, also experienced setbacks. In addition, ethnic and religious divisions were a major problem in Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Fiji. The region’s most important positive development was Nepal’s climb from Not Free to Partly Free due to the end of direct rule by the king and the return of parliament.
After several years of steady gains for democracy, Sub-Saharan Africa also suffered more setbacks than gains during the year. Congo (Brazzaville) saw its status decline from Partly Free to Not Free due principally to a lack of governmental transparency. Other countries, such as Burundi, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Somalia, and South Africa, suffered declines as well. On the positive side, the successful presidential elections in Congo (Kinshasa), the first in the country’s history, led to an improved political rights rating. Liberia, which showed progress in fighting corruption and expanding government transparency, also experienced a ratings increase.
There was little significant change in the state of freedom in the former Soviet Union in 2006. As was the case in the previous year, the only relatively bright spots were Ukraine, which enjoys a Free rating, and Georgia, a Partly Free country. On the negative side, Russia continued to serve as a model for authoritarian-minded leaders in the region and elsewhere, and the country experienced a modest decline as a result of its crackdown on non-governmental organizations. Modest declines were also noted in Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan.
The number of electoral democracies in the world in 2006 remained unchanged at 123.
Regional Patterns
Of the 35 countries in the Americas, 25 are Free (71 percent), 9 are Partly Free (26 percent), and one—Cuba—is Not Free (3 percent). In Latin America in particular, the past year was marked by an impressive number of competitive and fair elections in relatively new democracies experiencing social turbulence. Haiti, meanwhile, joined the ranks of electoral democracies, and its score improved from Not Free to Partly Free.
At the same time, Freedom in the World noted several problems in the United States, including a series of political corruption cases and weakness in the enforcement of laws allowing workers to engage in collective bargaining. Additionally, counter-terrorism policies of the Bush administration led to continued concerns about the protection of civil liberties.
Of the 18 countries in the Middle East/North Africa region, one country (Israel) is Free (6 percent), 6 are Partly Free (33 percent), and 11 are Not Free (61 percent). The region saw little change over the past year. The civil liberties ratings of both Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates increased as a result of improvements in freedom of assembly, while Syria’s rating gained due to a small improvement in greater personal autonomy. Modest declines were registered in Egypt for repression of the political opposition and in Bahrain and Iran for the curtailment of freedom of assembly. Declines were also noted in Iraq and the Palestinian Authority. In Lebanon, the promising achievements of the Cedar Revolution were seriously jeopardized by the conflict with Israel that erupted in the summer of 2006 and by efforts of Hezbollah to bring down the elected government.
In Western Europe, 24 countries are Free (96 percent) and one country, Turkey, is Partly Free. The survey again took note of some European governments’ failure to integrate non-white immigrants into the fabric of European economic and cultural life.
Of the 48 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, 11 are Free (23 percent), 22 are Partly Free (46 percent), and 15 are Not Free (31 percent).
Sixteen of Asia’s 39 countries are Free (41 percent), while 12 are Partly Free (31 percent) and 11 are Not Free (28 percent).
Of the 28 countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, 13 are Free (46 percent), 8 are Partly Free (29 percent), and 7 are Not Free (25 percent).
***19.01.2007. IFJ Welcomes Spanish Court Decision to Issue Arrest Warrants for US Soldiers Accused over Journalist's Death in Iraq
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today welcomed the decision by a Spanish Judge to issue arrest warrants for three US soldiers accused over the killing of Spanish TV cameraman José Couso.
Couso died when a US tank fired a shell at Baghdad’s Palestine Hotel on April 8, 2003. Reuters cameraman Taras Protsyuk was also killed and three other Reuters employees were seriously injured. On the same day Al Jazeera journalist Tareq Ayyoub was killed in a separate US attack on the network’s Baghdad bureau, raising questions of deliberate targeting of media.
The IFJ has called for independent investigations of these deaths and some 16 other deaths of media staff during the conflict at the hands of US troops.
Spain's Supreme Court reopened the Couso case in December. As well as issuing the international arrest warrants the judge asked prosecutors to determine whether the soldiers' assets in the United States could be frozen against any future compensation claims, according to recent press reports.
“This case, like that of ITN journalists Terry Lloyd who was killed by US soldiers just outside Basra at the start of the war, opens up the question of accountability over the killing of journalists,” said White. “We hope that the US will co-operate in trying to ensure that justice is delivered in all of these incidents.”
At least 178 journalists and media staff have been killed in Iraq since the start of the invasion in 2003. At least seven journalists and media workers have been found dead since January 1, according to reports. If the attacks continue at this pace, 134 journalists could be killed in 2007. That would be almost twice the tally of 69 killed in 2006.
“This alarming trend is threatening the complete destruction of journalism in Iraq,” said IFJ General Secretary Aidan White. “The human tragedy is shocking but this also underscores the general insecurity and lack of real democracy in the country. Journalists are being killed at a shocking rate with almost total impunity.”
The IFJ says that the chaos enveloping Iraq is overwhelming media professionals and is now preventing them to operate freely. Under a newly passed United Nations Security Council resolution on the safety of journalists, the killers of these journalists could be prosecuted as war crimes.
“International law is in place to bring the killers in these terrible crimes to justice,” White said. “It is now up to the Iraqi government to investigate and find the people responsible so that they can be brought to trial.”
***18.01.2007. Affaire Couso : un mandat d’arrêt international lancé contre trois militaires responsables du tir mortel (RSF)
"Nous espérons que la décision du juge Santiago Pedraz d’émettre un mandat d’arrêt international contre les militaires responsables du tir ayant tué José Couso permettra que les trois membres de l’armée américaine soient enfin entendus dans cette affaire", a déclaré Reportes sans frontières.
"Nous souhaitons que cette décision permette, au moins, de faire comprendre à quel point la question de la sécurité des journalistes en zone de conflit n’est pas abstraite et appelle des réponses urgentes. L’adoption à l’unanimité par le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies, le 23 décembre 2006, de la résolution 1738 sur la protection des journalistes dans les conflits armés, rappelle que la mort de professionnels de l’information ne doit plus être perçue comme une fatalité", a déclaré l’organisation de défense de la liberté de la presse.
Le 16 janvier 2007, le juge madrilène Santiago Pedraz a émis un mandat d‘arrêt international à l’encontre de trois militaires américains, pour l’"assassinat" de José Couso, cameraman de la chaîne privée Telecinco, tué le 8 avril 2003 dans l’attaque de l’Hôtel Palestine de Bagdad. Cette mesure concerne le sergent Thomas Gibson, le capitaine Philip Wolford et le lieutenant-colonel Philip de Camp, responsables du char de combat d’où venait le tir mortel. Santiago Pedraz a également demandé que la possibilité de geler les avoirs des militaires américains soit examinée, dans la perspective où ces derniers seraient condamnés à verser des dédommagements à la famille de José Couso.
L’ambassade des Etats-Unis en Espagne a rappelé que la mort de José Couso avait déjà fait l’objet d‘une enquête qui avait conclu que les militaires avaient agi "conformément aux règles de combat opérationnelles dans cette zone de conflit armé". L’avocat de la famille de José Couso, Leopoldo Torres Boursault, a déclaré que s’il n’obtenait pas l’extradition, il n’hésiterait pas à en appeler à l’application de la résolution 1738.
Si les autorités américaines refusaient d’extrader les trois militaires, ceux-ci pourraient tout de même être arrêtés s’ils se rendaient dans un pays avec lequel l’Espagne a signé un accord d’extradition.
Dans un rapport datant de 2003, l’armée américaine avait estimait qu’"aucune faute ou négligence n’avait été commise par les forces de la coalition", et que "le tir d’obus était dirigé contre ce qui a été pris pour une position de tir (...) ennemie". Le premier mandat d’arrêt à l’encontre des trois militaires émis en octobre 2005 par le juge Pedraz ainsi que ses deux demandes d’audition étaient restés sans effet, après le classement de l’affaire ordonné en mars 2006 par un tribunal pénal espagnol. La décision du Tribunal suprême de rouvrir l’enquête sur la mort du cameraman, le 5 décembre 2006, a relancé le dossier. Depuis le début du conflit en Irak, 146 professionnels des médias ont été tués, soit deux fois plus que pendant la guerre au Viêt-nam.
***11.01.2007. UNESCO CONFERENCE on freedom of expression and media development in Iraq (Paris, 8 to 10 january). Read below the point of view of two Iraqis journalists.
Iraqi journalists, members of parliament and government officials reached an unprecedented agreement about measures to protect and promote free and pluralistic media in Iraq during the International Conference on Freedom of Expression and Media Development in Iraq, held at UNESCO Headquarters from 8 to 10 January. The essential role of free, pluralistic and independent media in any democratic society is recognized in the Declaration adopted by the participants on Wednesday. They also addressed concerns regarding the safety of journalists and media regulation.
The adopted text reflects debates among the 300-odd participants at the Conference. They included nearly 200 Iraqi nationals: journalists, as well as some 20 members of the Iraqi parliament and government officials.
The safety of journalists in Iraq, which has become the world’s worst killing field for media professionals, was central at the conference. The participants agreed that journalists must retain their status as civilians in times of conflict (as stipulated by the Geneva Convention), that the highest priority should be given to the investigation of crimes against journalists and that such crimes should no longer go unpunished. The Declaration also calls for the establishment of a national fund to provide support to the families of journalists who have been killed in the line of duty.
On the subject of media regulation, participants said that the Iraqi National Communication and Media Commission should continue to function as an independent regulatory body, that the Iraqi Media Network should continue functioning as an independent public service broadcaster and journalists and media should be able to form associations and regulate their own professional themselves.
In their Declaration the participants clearly linked democracy and development with human rights and emphasized the important role of women in the media and in the process of reconstruction. The three-day conference was organized by the Iraqi National Communication and Media Commission of Iraq, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and UNESCO.
The Director-General of UNESCO, Koïchiro Matsuura, welcomed the outcome of the Conference: “I welcome the Declaration, the outcome of the participatory process that characterized this conference. I trust that the recommendations it contains will mark a mile stone in the development of a free, just and democratic society in Iraq.”
Interview with Dr Selwa Zako
Dr Selwa Zako, Senior media advisor with Iraq’s Communications and Media Commission (CMC) and editor-in-chief of monthly magazine, Tawasol (Communicate), spoke about her work in what has become the most dangerous country for journalists.
Interview by the UNESCO Bureau of Public Information
Q: Do Iraqi journalists enjoy the press freedom enshrined in the country’s national legislation?
A: In the very beginning we really enjoyed freedom of speech and freedom of expression but later very gradually we started to lose this benefit because of political complications in the situation. As a journalist, you don’t have a gun and you cannot fight enemies you don’t see, so all you can do is try to protect yourself but for how long. When you see a fellow journalist killed in cold blood, I think the aim is not this journalist, that is one aim, the other aim (of the killers) is to scare you, to scare the rest. So we started to avoid telling the truth directly. But you can find ways to tell the truth in other words, that’s always possible.
Q: Do you find that journalists in Iraq have the courage to use these ways tell the truth, despite the danger? A: Yeah! There are many ways of telling the truth without saying it directly; you develop that ability but that is also a restriction. Some foreign journalists come and stay in hotels. The ones who collect the information and take pictures are the Iraqi journalists. They bring it to the foreign journalists because we need other people to hear about us. They are risking their lives to send the truth abroad. Most of the Iraqi news we hear from come from others, from [foreign] satellite channels and radios, not from our own newspapers or satellites. Newspapers and radio programmes say the very minimum, sometimes they turn a blind eye on a certain event, on a certain party that killed a fellow journalist. By the way, we know about the killers of most of journalists but we cannot say that. We know who is doing it and why, of course, but who is going to say this? This is really a risk.
Q: What can we expect of conferences such as this one at UNESCO in terms of helping the media in Iraq? A: We need unity, we are working as individuals, newspapers do not communicate with each other, TV channels, radios everyone is working alone. This kind of conference brings people together helps to cooperate. You cannot depend on the army or police to protect you, some people suggested that we are going to distribute guns to journalists but what sort of journalist is that? And how can you defend yourself with a gun? The only way is to draw an outline for the future on how to cooperate, how to help each other, how to talk to the international community.
Q: And what can the international community do, in a concrete way? A: They made a lot of mistakes and it is possible even now to put it on the right track again. There is time, very short time but it is possible. We are officially, by UN decision, under UN protection, so they have to do something about this, to help themselves as well. The last few months they realized very clearly that they have to do something about that.
Q: How should they do this? A: Put Iraq back on the right track, without these religious parties. Don’t you ever believe that they are strong, they are only strong because they are backed. Alone, all they have are some arms and money. But people are lost that’s why people are following them. Once people feel that there is a strong State no one will follow a religious party. We’ve never had that before. But people are in a desperate mood, they need someone to protect them. And these people tell them, “we can protect you” and they are much stronger than the government and the army. I am sure that if they had the will to do something, they would be able to do something. Don’t tell me they can’t.
Q: What are the most urgent measures to be taken by the international community? A: Not the international community, the coalition armies. They have to hit the militias first, this is the main danger facing us. And once you hit one of them the rest will keep quiet. Second, do something about the money and arms that are being poured into Iraq across all frontiers.
Interview with Emad Alkhafaji, Independent TV journalist
Emad Alkhafaji, spoke about his work in what has become the most dangerous country for journalists.
Interview by the UNESCO Bureau of Public Information
Q: In view of the violence in Iraq, are you able to carry out your work professionally?
A: Right now it’s very hard. There are many kinds of dangers, from the militias, from terrorists and even from the government. Many of them don’t believe in free media. They may say they do, but maybe they think that free media are media that make no problems, I hear this from many politicians. When you talk about corruption, or the killing of people and who is behind that, you are making problems. The danger in other countries may be that you are put in jail or fired from your work, in Iraq the danger is that you be fired from your whole life. There is a feeling, while you are on the street in Iraq that you will be killed. As a journalist you are in the middle of danger, so the possibility of being killed is probably more than ordinary people. That’s why there is a feeling that this is OK, I will be killed but let me know who is going to take care of my family when I leave this life.
Q: What do you expect of conferences such as this one? A: This is very important. Even if it’s not going to solve the problems, it raises the questions openly. I think the donors who are giving money to Iraq should ask the government, about freedom of speech and about protection of journalists and their families.
Q: But if you ask a government to protect journalists, is there a danger that this means asking the government to control journalists? A: Yes, I didn’t mean that the government should protect me by giving me a weapon. The minister of the interior said he’d give us pistols. But everyday I asked myself, shall I carry that pistol to protect myself? No, I shouldn’t. I expect to carry a camera or a pen, not a pistol. I am not asking for that kind of protection. Until today the government is not asking, if I have health insurance, if I have some kind of protection in case I get fired, some kind of pay if I go to a dangerous place. The Iraqi government is not asking the foreign media what they are doing with Iraqi journalists, what are they giving them. Most of the foreign media in Iraq are working through Iraqis, but they are not giving them anything except for small salaries. I am asking the government to ask the media companies, or any companies, “what do you have for your Iraqi employees?” Sometimes the companies say, we have the right to hire you or fire you any time but if you want to resign you should to ask us a month in advance and you don’t have any rights but if you get killed that’s your own responsibility. You need to work 24 hours seven days a week. And what do you give them? Nothing.
***31.12.2006: 2006 one of the bloodiest years ever for journalists around the world according to separate reports released by the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (read the PEC report on our page “News” and the list of victims on “Media ticking clock”).
IFJ recorded at least 155 murders, assassinations and unexplained deaths in 2006. The conflict in Iraq accounted for 68 of the deaths. Violence in Latin America, particularly in Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela, claimed the lives of 37 media staff, while in Asia, attacks in the Philippines and Sri Lanka pushed the death toll to 34.
IFJ's statistics include media staff - fixers, drivers, technicians, security staff and translators - and those whose murders may not be directly related to their work.
CPJ recorded 55 journalists killed in 2006, two short of its record high of 57 in 2004. It also recorded 27 deaths in which it has not been confirmed whether they were work-related. CPJ only counts journalists killed in direct reprisal for their work, in crossfire, or while carrying out a dangerous assignment.
Iraq, Afghanistan and the Philippines were the three most dangerous countries for journalists, according to CPJ. In 2006, 32 journalists died in the line of duty in Iraq, making it the deadliest year for journalists in a single country that CPJ has ever recorded.
RSF, which like CPJ includes only individuals killed in direct relation to their work, counted 81 journalists slain in 2006, its highest total in 22 years. It also recorded 32 media staff killed.
The high number of killings was not the only significant statistic noted by RSF. It counted more than 1,400 physical attacks or threats against journalists in 2006, a record. Many of them occurred during election campaigns in various countries.
For the first time, Reporters Without Borders kept statistics on journalists kidnapped around the world. It found that at least 56 were kidnapped in 2006 in a dozen countries. The riskiest places were Iraq, where 17 were seized, and the Gaza Strip, where six were kidnapped (IFEX).
IFJ press release: The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) said today that 2006 was a year of tragedy for the world’s media as killings of reporters and media staff reached historic levels with at least 155 murders, assassinations and unexplained deaths.
“Media have become more powerful and journalism has become more dangerous,” said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “2006 was the worst year on record – a year of targeting, brutality and continued impunity in the killing of journalists.”
During the year the numbers began to accumulate with civil strife and resistance to military occupation in Iraq. The IFJ says media became prime targets of terror attacks or victims of poor soldiering. By the year’s end, 68 media staff had been killed, bringing to 170 the number killed in the country since the invasion in April 2003.
Elsewhere, the IFJ says continuing violence in Latin America, particularly Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela, claimed the lives of 37 media staff while in Asia relentless attacks in the Philippines and Sri Lanka pushed the total of killings to 34.
The only positive sign came in the final days of the year, says the IFJ, when the United Nations, for the first time ever, issued a statement condemning targeting of journalists and calling for prosecution of the killers of media staff.
In a resolution passed on December 23 the UN Security Council unanimously called on governments to respect international law and to protect civilians in armed conflict. The Council called for an end to impunity and for prosecution of the killers of journalists and agreed to prepare annual reports on the risks facing media.
“This was the only bright spot in a year of unremitting gloom,” said White. “For the first time the United Nations has put the focus on a deepening media crisis. It is long overdue. We want to see action against countries that allow impunity in the killing of journalists.”
The IFJ totals for 2006 are as follows: Murders, Targeted Killings and Unexplained Deaths: 155 Not included -- Accidental Death while on duty: 22
The previous high was last year when the IFJ recorded 154 deaths, a number inflated tragically by the deaths of 48 Iranian journalists on a military assignment. But this year there were many fewer accidents – just 22.
The full details are set out in the IFJ report –Journalism Put to the Sword – to be published in the middle of January. The report also covers the work of the IFJ Safety Fund, which provides humanitarian aid to the victims of violence and their families.
The focus once again is on Iraq, where the IFJ has been campaigning vigorously over impunity in the killing of journalists. For the last three years the IFJ has organised a day of protest on April 8 – the day in 2003 when three journalists died under US fire in Baghdad. There have been 19 such killings in Iraq and in all these cases media organisations and victims’ families are still waiting for independent and credible reports about what happened.
In October a judge in the United Kingdom said one of the victims, ITN journalist Terry Lloyd, was unlawfully killed by American soldiers outside Basra. His interpreter Hussein Osman was also killed and cameraman Fred Nerac is missing believed dead. There have been calls for prosecution of US servicemen involved in this and many other cases.
Nevertheless, during 2006 the vast majority of killings have been at the hands of terrorists and sectarian gangs who have made the streets of Baghdad and other major cities no-go areas for many news teams.
But the IFJ says that the crisis of impunity is not confined to conflict zones.
On December 12 the Federation joined with other international press support groups to launch an International Commission of Inquiry into the killings of journalists in Russia. The action follows the assassination of investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya in Moscow on October 7. Her death was the latest in more than 200 killings of journalists in Russia since 1993. Many of these have been explained, but since President Vladimir Putin came to power around 40 killings of journalists have taken place and none of them have been satisfactorily resolved.
Second only to Iraq among the most dangerous spots in the world for active journalism is the Philippines, says the IFJ, where 13 journalists died in 2006, bringing to 49 the number of media staff murdered since Gloria Arroya came to power in 2001 – surpassing the numbers killed under the 14-year Marcos Dictatorship.
And in Latin America journalists in Mexico moved ahead of Colombia as the deadliest country for journalists covering crime and corruption with 10 deaths, many of them investigative reporters.
In Africa countries wracked by internal conflict also proved to be the most dangerous for journalists. Swedish freelance Martin Adler was shot while filming a demonstration in Mogadishu and veteran journalist Mohammed Taha, a Sudanese editor, was kidnapped and killed.
“It has been a year in which small steps have been taken to confront this media catastrophe,” said White, “The issue will figure strongly at the IFJ World Congress to be held in Moscow in May. But we must do more, particularly to help the victims of violence and to bring the killers of our colleagues to justice.”
RSF report : l’année la plus meurtrière depuis 1994
En 2006, au moins 81 journalistes ont été tués dans l’exercice de leur métier ou pour avoir exprimé leurs opinions, dans vingt et un pays. Il faut remonter à 1994 pour trouver un chiffre plus élevé. Cette année-là, 103 journalistes avaient trouvé la mort dont près de la moitié pendant le génocide au Rwanda, près d’une vingtaine en Algérie, victimes de la guerre civile, et une dizaine en ex-Yougoslavie.
Trente-deux collaborateurs des médias ("fixeurs", chauffeurs, traducteurs, techniciens, agents de sécurité, etc.) ont également été tués en 2006, contre cinq l’an passé.
A la différence d’autres organisations, Reporters sans frontières ne prend en compte que les professionnels des médias dont elle est certaine que leur mort est liée à leur devoir d’informer. Plusieurs dizaines d’autres cas n’ont pas été comptabilisés, car ils sont encore en investigation ou ont été écartés, car ils ne relèvent pas du domaine de la liberté de la presse.
Pour la quatrième année consécutive, l’Irak reste le pays le plus dangereux au monde pour les professionnels des médias : 64 d’entre eux (journalistes et collaborateurs) y ont trouvé la mort en 2006. Au total, depuis le début de la guerre, 139 journalistes ont été tués en Irak, soit plus du double du nombre de journalistes tués pendant les vingt années de la guerre du Viêt-nam (63 tués entre 1955 et 1975). Dans près de 90 % des cas, les victimes sont des journalistes irakiens. Les enquêtes sont rarissimes et n’aboutissent jamais.
Deuxième au "palmarès" des Etats les plus dangereux pour les journalistes, le Mexique est devenu le pays le plus meurtrier du continent américain, devançant la Colombie. En 2006, neuf journalistes ont été tués parce qu’ils enquêtaient sur les narcotrafiquants ou couvraient des mouvements sociaux violents. Dans la région d’Oaxaca, secouée par des luttes sociales qui ont parfois dégénéré en affrontements armés, un cameraman américain, Brad Will, a été tué par balle, fin octobre. Plusieurs autres journalistes ont été blessés au cours des mêmes événements. Par ailleurs, le 9 août, le corps sans vie d’Enrique Pera Quintanilla a été retrouvé au bord d’une route, dans l’Etat de Chihuahua, dans le nord du pays. Il était le directeur du mensuel Dos Caras, una verdad (Deux visages, une vérité), spécialisé dans l’information sur les assassinats non élucidés et le trafic de drogue.
Aux Philippines, la situation n’est guère plus réjouissante. Six journalistes ont été assassinés en 2006 (sept en 2005). Fin mai, Fernando Batul, commentateur de la radio dyPR, a été tué par balles alors qu’il se rendait à son travail dans l’île de Palawan (sud-ouest de Manille). Selon les autorités, ce crime est lié aux chroniques du journaliste sur le comportement violent d’un policier. L’agent a été interpellé et devrait être jugé prochainement. Toujours dans l’archipel, les assassins de Marlene Esperat, éditorialiste et militante anti-corruption, tuée en mars 2005, ont été condamnés à la réclusion à perpétuité. Certes, il s’agit uniquement d’hommes de main et les commanditaires courent toujours. Mais, dans un pays où l’impunité est la règle, cette décision de justice a valeur d’exemple à suivre.
En Russie, trois journalistes ont été tués au cours de l’année (soit, au total, 21 depuis l’arrivée au pouvoir de Vladimir Poutine en mars 2000). L’assassinat, en octobre, d’Anna Politkovskaïa, reporter de l’hebdomadaire Novaia Gazeta et spécialiste de la Tchétchénie, est venu rappeler que même les journalistes les plus connus et les plus soutenus par la communauté internationale ne sont pas à l’abri de telles violences meurtrières. Une enquête est en cours. Le Kremlin, prié par les Etats démocratiques de tout faire pour identifier et sanctionner les responsables de ce crime, a mis en place une équipe de 150 enquêteurs pour mener à bien les investigations.
Chez le voisin turkmène, la situation de la liberté de la presse n’a cessé d’empirer au cours de l’année 2006. Le paroxysme de la répression engagée contre la presse indépendante a été atteint en septembre, lorsque la correspondante de Radio Free Europe, Ogoulsapar Mouradova, est morte en prison, certainement des suites des coups qu’elle aurait subis. Malgré les demandes insistantes de l’Union européenne, aucune enquête n’a été menée par les autorités turkmènes pour élucider les circonstances de la mort de la journaliste, emprisonnée depuis trois mois au moment du drame.
Au Liban, pendant la guerre avec Israël, une photographe et un technicien de télévision ont été tués par des bombardements de l’armée israélienne. Au total, une dizaine de journalistes ont été blessés au cours des affrontements, pendant l’été.
Des campagnes électorales particulièrement violentes
Plus de 1 400 cas d’agressions ou de menaces ont été recensés par Reporters sans frontières au cours de l’année 2006. Là encore, il s’agit d’un record. Ces actes violents ont été particulièrement nombreux pendant les multiples campagnes électorales de l’année 2006.
Au Bangladesh, les agressions de journalistes - déjà fréquentes en période normale - étaient quotidiennes en fin d’année, à quelques semaines d’élections législatives cruciales pour le pays. Les forces de l’ordre, mais également des sympathisants de plusieurs partis politiques, sont responsables de ces violences.
Sur le continent américain, une dizaine de pays ont connu des scrutins nationaux d’importance pendant l’année. Au Pérou, début mars, soit un mois avant l’élection présidentielle, Reporters sans frontières avait déjà recensé plus d’une dizaine de cas d’agressions contre des journalistes et autant de menaces. A Marilia, dans le sud du Brésil, les locaux d’un quotidien ont été saccagés par les partisans d’un élu local, le jour même du premier tour des élections générales.
En République démocratique du Congo, les partisans des deux principaux candidats - Joseph Kabila, le président sortant, et son rival Jean-Pierre Bemba - s’en sont régulièrement pris aux journalistes du "camp adverse". En Ouganda comme en Ethiopie, un envoyé spécial étranger a été expulsé en période électorale.
Enfin au Bélarus, quelques jours après la réélection d’Alexandre Loukachenko à la tête du pays, en mars 2006, une vague de répression s’est abattue sur les opposants et les journalistes. Une dizaine de reporters locaux et quelques envoyés spéciaux étrangers ont été agressés, dont Oleg Ulevitch, correspondant du journal Komsomolskaïa Pravda. Le reporter, de nationalité russe, a eu le nez cassé après avoir été battu par des policiers en civil.
La censure et les arrestations, des pratiques toujours abondamment utilisées
Le nombre de cas de censure a légèrement diminué : 912 cas contre 1 006 l’année précédente. En 2005, c’est au Népal que la censure avait été le plus massive. Le cessez-le-feu signé pendant l’été 2006 a permis à la presse de souffler un peu. Les journalistes emprisonnés ont été libérés et les nombreuses radios locales ont pu reprendre librement leur travail.
Cette année, c’est en Thaïlande que le plus grand nombre de cas de censures a été relevé. Au lendemain du coup d’Etat militaire, le 19 septembre 2006, plus de 300 radios communautaires ont été fermées, ainsi que plusieurs sites Internet. La situation est revenue à la normale au bout de quelques semaines.
Il est, par ailleurs, impossible de quantifier la censure en Chine, en Corée du Nord ou en Birmanie par exemple. Dans ces pays, des mesures globales ont été prises contre l’ensemble de la profession, touchant d’un seul coup plusieurs dizaines, voire plusieurs centaines d’organes de presse.
Le Web est étroitement contrôlé dans plusieurs pays de la planète. Reporters sans frontières a rendu publique, en novembre, une liste des treize ennemis d’Internet : Arabie saoudite, Bélarus, Birmanie, Chine, Corée du Nord, Cuba, Egypte, Iran, Ouzbékistan, Syrie, Tunisie, Turkménistan, Viêt-nam.
Dans ces Etats, des blogueurs et des cyberdissidents ont été régulièrement emprisonnés pour s’être exprimés librement sur le Net. Des sites ont été fermés, rendus inaccessibles ou filtrés et les forums de discussion ont été épurés des messages les plus critiques.
Au total, pendant l’année 2006, près d’une trentaine de blogueurs ont été arrêtés et détenus pendant plusieurs semaines, notamment en Chine, en Iran et en Syrie. L’Egypte a, pour la première fois, fait son apparition sur la liste des "ennemis d’Internet" pour sa répression de plus en plus dure à l’égard des blogueurs critiques envers le président Hosni Moubarak ou l’islam.
Au moins 871 journalistes ont été privés de leur liberté en 2006, dans le monde. Certains ont été interpellés quelques heures. D’autres ont été condamnés à de lourdes peines de prison.
Parmi ces derniers, les cas de Zhao Yan et de Ching Cheong, en Chine, ont suscité de fortes réactions au sein de la communauté internationale. Les deux hommes qui collaboraient à des organes de presse étrangers devraient passer respectivement trois et cinq ans en prison. Lors de leur procès en appel, la justice n’a même pas daigné organiser une audience, privant ainsi les condamnés de toute possibilité de se défendre.
Au Turkménistan, le décès, en toute fin d’année, du président à vie Separmourad Niazov pourrait mettre un terme à l’oppression qui pesait jusque-là sur les journalistes et les défenseurs des droits de l’homme. Deux d’entre eux - Annakourban Amanklytchev et Sapardourdy Khajiev - ont été condamnés, en juin, à des peines de six et sept ans de prison pour avoir aidé une journaliste étrangère qui réalisait un reportage sur leur pays.
En Birmanie, le célèbre journaliste et militant de la cause démocratique, Win Tin, a entamé sa dix-huitième année derrière les barreaux. Il a reçu le prix Reporters sans frontières - Fondation de France 2006 pour son combat en faveur de la liberté d’expression.
Une inquiétude supplémentaire : les enlèvements de journalistes
Pour la première fois, Reporters sans frontières a recensé, de manière précise, le nombre de journalistes enlevés dans le monde.
Au moins 56 journalistes ont été kidnappés en 2006 dans une dizaine de pays. Les deux zones les plus risquées sont l’Irak, où dix-sept professionnels de la presse ont été enlevés depuis le début de l’année 2006, et la bande de Gaza, où six reporters ont été kidnappés. Si, dans les Territoires palestiniens, ces enlèvements se sont tous terminés par des libérations, en Irak, six professionnels des médias ont été exécutés par leurs ravisseurs.
Reporters sans frontières a rencontré, fin 2006, le chef de l’Etat irakien, Jalal Talabani, pour l’exhorter à prendre des mesures mettant fin à ces pratiques. L’organisation s’est également rendue à Gaza, pour demander au président Mahmoud Abbas et aux responsables des principales factions palestiniennes d’user de leur influence pour appeler leurs partisans et l’ensemble de la population à ne plus s’en prendre aux professionnels de la presse.
CPJ report. New York, December 20, 2006—Violence in Iraq claimed the lives of 32 journalists in 2006, the deadliest year for the press in a single country that the Committee to Protect Journalists has ever recorded. In most cases, such as the killing of Atwar Bahjat, one of the best-known television reporters in the Arab world, insurgents specifically targeted journalists to be murdered, CPJ found in a new analysis.
Worldwide, CPJ found 55 journalists were killed in direct connection to their work in 2006, and it is investigating another 27 deaths to determine whether they were work-related. Detailed accounts of each case are posted on CPJ’s Web site. The figures reflect increases from 2005, when 47 journalists were killed in direct relation to their work, while 17 others died in circumstances in which the link to their profession was not clear. CPJ, founded in 1981, compiles and analyzes journalist deaths each year.
Afghanistan and the Philippines, with three deaths apiece, were the next most dangerous datelines in 2006. Russia, Mexico, Pakistan, and Colombia each saw two journalists killed. All are traditionally dangerous countries for the press, CPJ research shows.
But for the fourth consecutive year, Iraq was in a category all its own as the deadliest place for journalists. This year’s killings bring to 92 the number of journalists who have died in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003. In addition, 37 media support workers—interpreters, drivers, fixers, and office workers—have been killed since the war began.
Only four journalists died in Iraq in 2006 as a result of crossfire or acts of war, CPJ’s analysis found. The other 28 were murdered, half of them threatened beforehand. Three were kidnapped and then slain, CPJ found.
“The deaths in Iraq this year reflect the utter deterioration in reporters’ traditional status as neutral observers in wartime,” said CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon. “When this conflict began more than three and half years ago, most journalists died in combat-related incidents. Now, insurgents routinely target journalists for perceived affiliations—political, sectarian, or Western. This is an extraordinarily alarming trend because along with the terrible loss of life, it is limiting news reporting in Iraq—and, in turn, our own understanding of a vital story.”
The viciousness of the onslaught in Iraq was shown on October 12 when masked gunmen attacked the Baghdad offices of the fledgling satellite TV channel Al-Shaabiya and executed 11 people, five of them journalists. It was the deadliest single assault on the press since the 2003 invasion.
Here are other trends about Iraq that emerged in CPJ’s analysis:
• Murder now accounts for 61 percent of deaths in Iraq since the war began. The incidence of murder began to increase 20 months ago and accelerated in the past year. Crossfire and combat-related incidents had been a more frequent cause of media deaths in the first two years of the war.
• The 2006 toll jumped 45 percent from the 22 deaths recorded in 2005.
• The war in Iraq is the deadliest conflict CPJ has documented. Iraq has far surpassed the Algerian civil conflict of the 1990s, which took the lives of 58 journalists.
• The 2006 tally in Iraq is the highest in a single country since CPJ was founded in 1981. The second deadliest years were 2004 in Iraq and 1995 in Algeria, both of which saw 24 journalists killed.
Among those slain was Russian Anna Politkovskaya, a leading investigative journalist and critic of President Vladimir Putin. She was shot, contract-style, in her Moscow apartment building on October 7.
“When an internationally renowned reporter can be gunned down in her own apartment building and the perpetrators walk away free, it has a devastating effect on the press. Fewer tough questions are asked, fewer risky stories are covered,” Simon added. “Her case shows why impunity is such a serious threat to press freedom, not only in Russia but in nations such as the Philippines, Colombia, Mexico, and Pakistan.”
Politkovskaya was among eight female journalists killed in 2006. In the Central Asian nation of Turkmenistan, reporter Ogulsapar Muradova of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty was killed in prison under unexplained circumstances in September. Muradova was a critic of President Saparmurat Niyazov. And in southern Lebanon, an Israeli missile killed freelance photographer Layal Najib in July as she was traveling by taxi to cover civilians fleeing north.
The deadliest nations include such disparate places as the Philippines and Afghanistan. Two of the victims in the Philippines were radio commentators,continuing a trend CPJ has documented over several years. In strife-ridden Afghanistan, two German radio journalists were among the three casualties.
In Latin America, two nations with long histories of violence against the press appeared on the 2006 list of dangerous places. In Colombia, two provincial journalists known for tough reporting on paramilitary activities were slain. In Mexico, a local crime reporter was murdered in the eastern city of Veracruz, and a U.S. freelance journalist was shot to death during civil unrest in the southern state of Oaxaca. CPJ is investigating the disappearance of a northern Mexican journalist and the slayings of five others in circumstances that are not yet clear.
In sub-Saharan Africa, one journalist was killed in direct connection to his work in 2006. Martin Adler, an award-winning Swedish photojournalist, was shot while filming a June demonstration in Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu.
CPJ applies strict standards for each entry on its annual list of journalists killed; researchers independently investigate and verify the circumstances behind each death. CPJ considers a case as work-related only when its staff is reasonably certain that a journalist was killed in direct reprisal for his or her work; in crossfire; or while carrying out a dangerous assignment.
If the motives in a killing are unclear, but it is possible that a journalist died in direct relation to his or her work, CPJ classifies the case as “unconfirmed” and continues to investigate. CPJ’s list does not include journalists who are killed in accidents—such as car or plane crashes—unless the crash was caused by hostile action (for example, if a plane were shot down or a car crashed trying to avoid gunfire). Other press organizations using different criteria cite higher numbers of deaths than CPJ.
***28.12.2006. Rapport de RSF: “La poudrière de Gaza : les journalistes palestiniens pris entre deux feux”
Les journalistes palestiniens et étrangers qui travaillent dans les Territoires palestiniens sont aujourd’hui exposés à une double menace : celle de l’armée israélienne, responsable, depuis 2000, de nombreuses exactions à leur endroit et celle, plus récente, des différentes factions palestiniennes, lesquelles n’hésitent plus à s’en prendre aux médias qui les critiquent.
La bande de Gaza est devenue, en 2006, le théâtre de très durs affrontements interpalestiniens. Les tensions entre le Hamas, parti islamique au pouvoir, élu en début d’année, et le Fatah, dont est issu le président Mahmoud Abbas, ont conduit à une impasse politique et paralysé les institutions palestiniennes. Cette division au sein de l’exécutif a inévitablement eu de violentes répercussions dans la rue et aujourd’hui les professionnels de l’information ne sont plus en sécurité.
Si tous les représentants des factions palestiniennes et de l’armée israélienne affichent leur volonté de respecter la liberté de la presse et le travail des journalistes, les chiffres démentent les uns et les autres. Au cours de la seule année 2006, l’armée israélienne a agressé ou menacé seize journalistes et détruit les locaux de trois médias tandis que des militants palestiniens ont endommagé les bureaux de sept médias, détruisant leurs équipements et agressant au moins quatre professionnels de l’information. Par ailleurs, six journalistes étrangers ont été enlevés dans la bande de Gaza par des Palestiniens. Ce bilan inquiétant a motivé la visite de Reporters sans frontières, dont une délégation s’est rendue du 4 au 7 décembre 2006 dans la bande de Gaza et en Israël, afin d’enquêter sur les conditions de travail des journalistes, de rencontrer les autorités et de proposer des solutions pour mieux assurer leur sécurité.
Pour Reporters sans frontières, la sécurité des journalistes ne sera prise au sérieux que lorsque l’Autorité palestinienne et l’armée israélienne auront décidé d’appliquer la loi, en poursuivant et sanctionnant les individus qui se rendent coupables de délits à l’égard des journalistes. Des enquêtes systématiques doivent être ouvertes, leurs résultats rendus publics et les coupables sanctionnés.
Par ailleurs, Reporters sans frontières propose la création d’un signe distinctif permettant de mieux identifier les journalistes. L’organisation est généralement opposée à ce type de signe qui désigne, de fait, les journalistes en tant que cibles. En Irak ou en Afghanistan, s’identifier de la sorte accroît considérablement les risques auxquels on s’expose. Mais dans les Territoires palestiniens, face à une armée régulière et professionnelle, cette identification peut, dans certains cas, accorder une protection supplémentaire. Reporters sans frontières propose donc de rassembler rapidement des journalistes palestiniens et israéliens, des responsables politiques des deux camps, ainsi que des militaires israéliens, pour réfléchir ensemble à cette question et trouver une solution permettant, à l’avenir, de réduire les risques auxquels s’exposent les journalistes qui travaillent dans les Territoires.
Il est également important que toutes les factions palestiniennes s’accordent au plus vite sur une déclaration commune appelant au respect du travail des journalistes locaux et étrangers. Dans les Territoires, l’amélioration de la situation de la liberté de la presse passe aussi par l’ouverture des médias publics - l’agence de presse WAFA et la PBC (télévision et radio publiques) - à tous les protagonistes palestiniens quelle que soit leur affiliation politique.
Enfin, l’établissement d’une instance de régulation permettrait de contrôler les dérives des médias utilisés comme relais de la propagande de certaines factions. La professionnalisation des médias, c’est-à-dire un statut reconnu par tous, permettrait également de lutter contre la stigmatisation des journalistes qui sont souvent qualifiés de "traîtres à la nation" dès qu’ils tentent de prendre un peu de recul et de distance avec les partis politiques.
Le rapport d’enquête complet, “La poudrière de Gaza : les journalistes palestiniens pris entre deux feux”, est disponible sur www.rsf.org
***25.12.2006. SOMALIA. PRESS STATEMENT : NUSOJ Presents its Annual Report on Press Freedom Violations
The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) is pleased to present its annual report on press freedom violations in the country. This report reveals how press freedom was endangered. In relation to the report, 2006 becomes the worst year for press freedom in Somalia for more than a decade.
The annual report documents cases of violations of press freedom that took place from January to December 2006. The report consists of thirty (30) cases of media people murdered, injured, arrested, banned, intimidated and censored at some stage in their media work or because of their journalistic activities. As well, it discloses media institutions attacked, censored and closed.
In these brutal violations, two (2) media personnel were killed, two (2) journalists were injured, twenty two (22) journalists were arrested, seven (7) radio stations were closed down, six (6) journalists were intimidated and one thousand three hundred (1300) copies of a newspaper were burned.
"We were struck by the horrendous level of brutal violations pursued to media practitioners who stood up to inform the public freely & fairly and to defend their rights and professional independence" said Omar Faruk Osman, the Secretary General of the National union of Somali Journalists.
"I would like to pay tribute to all Somali journalists, men & women, who stood up to protect their professional independence and rights" said Omar Faruk Osman.
"As a NUSOJ, we are and will be faithful to our mandate, and continue our determined defence for freedom of press" added Omar Faruk Osman.
In the year 2005, 20 cases of violations of freedom of press happened in Somalia . But journalists felt unanticipated and intense pressure in 2006.
This information is disseminated by the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ). NUSOJ takes the responsibility of the information expressed inside this mail, and any organization, union or group is allowed to recopy or republish this information. For press freedom observations, email: somaliapressfreedom@googlemail.com , for all other correspondences, email: faruk129@yahoo.com
***19.12.2006. CONFERENCE DE PRESSE DU MINISTRE FRANçAIS DES AE ET RSF A PARIS - projet de résolution de la France au Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU. PV officiel des déclarations du ministre
IV.- PRESENTATION DE L'INITIATIVE FRANCAISE SUR LA PROTECTION DES JOURNALISTES DANS LES CONFLITS ARMES INTERVENTION DU MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES ETRANGERES, M. PHILIPPE DOUSTE-BLAZY
(Paris, 19 décembre 2006)
Pour garantir la protection des journalistes dans les conflits armés, nous avons évoqué, en effet, avec Olivier Poivre d'Arvor et Robert Ménard, il y a quelques semaines, une possibilité de résolution dans l'enceinte qui, aujourd'hui, exprime le multilatéralisme : le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. La France occupe un poste de membre permanent au Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies et nous sommes conscients de l'importance de cette position.
Il est évident que la liberté d'informer est au ceur de toute démocratie. Je voudrais à mon tour saluer le travail de Pierre Lellouche et de François Loncle pour ce rapport d'information, qui est à l'origine de cette démarche. Dans une démocratie, il est bon de voir que les parlementaires peuvent avoir cet esprit d'initiative.
C'est bien de se rencontrer au "Press Club". C'est un lieu symbolique qui rappelle les valeurs d'engagement, de professionnalisme, de solidarité qui animent les femmes et les hommes des médias. Qu'ils soient journalistes, qu'ils soient reporters de guerre, qu'ils soient "fixeurs" ou personnels associés, ce sont eux, vous, qui chaque jour nous aidez à mieux comprendre le monde et ses évolutions. C'est quelqu'un qui est engagé politiquement qui le dit, et ce n'est pas une question de parti, c'est une question d'engagement public.
Le sujet qui nous préoccupe est évidemment très grave. Comme le montre une fois de plus l'actualité de ces dernières 48 heures : plusieurs de vos confrères, dont Didier François, du journal "Libération", ont été blessés dans l'exercice de leur métier. Et la situation risque, permettez-moi de le dire, d'être encore plus difficile au cours des prochains jours.
Je crois qu'une volonté commune nous rassemble, c'est de combattre les violences dont sont victimes les journalistes et de lutter contre toutes les formes d'insécurité dans les situations de conflits armés. Que ce soient les correspondants de guerre, que ce soient les envoyés spéciaux ou les journalistes indépendants, ils sont de plus en plus victimes d'attaques délibérées alors qu'ils cherchent à informer et à dire la vérité.
Sans revenir sur les chiffres que Robert Ménard vient de donner, je peux dire que grâce à vous on a pu bouger. Il est vrai que, généralement, au Quai d'Orsay, en rédigeant un communiqué, on fait très attention à la forme, au fond et au ton, mais là, il y a urgence. La préoccupation exprimée par la profession a été relayée avec une telle efficacité par Reporters sans Frontières qu'on ne pouvait pas ne pas bouger.
Face à la recrudescence de ces drames, nous avons décidé de répondre à votre appel et nous avons proposé, en lien avec nos partenaires grecs, un projet de résolution au Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies.
Je voudrais saluer ici l'ambassadeur de la République hellénique en France. Je me réjouis qu'un partenaire européen soit engagé avec nous dans cette action au service de l'une de nos libertés fondamentales. La France s'est exprimée à New York dans ce sens, le 4 décembre dernier, en appelant la communauté internationale à accorder une attention accrue à la question de la protection des journalistes dans les conflits armés. Le même jour, un projet de résolution a été formellement présenté conjointement avec la Grèce.
Je crois qu'à l'époque de la globalisation de l'information, il est impératif d'adapter nos moyens de protection et je tiens à vous dire que ce projet de résolution sera déposé et devrait être accepté, dans quelques jours. C'est une affaire importante parce que dès l'instant où le projet de résolution sera voté, j'espère à l'unanimité, au Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies - je ne vois pas qui pourrait ne pas le voter -, eh bien ce sera évidemment une grande avancée. Le temps est venu pour nous de compter les votes dès l'instant où le projet de résolution sera déposé.
Avec cette résolution, il s'agit, premièrement, de rappeler à toutes les parties à des conflits, leurs obligations en matière de protection et de sécurité des journalistes. Nous avons voulu que des obligations incombent en premier lieu aux gouvernements. C'est l'impératif de la responsabilité de protéger les populations civiles, entre guillemets, qui s'impose à tous les Etats membres des Nations unies depuis le Sommet du Millénaire, en septembre 2005.
Deuxièmement, il s'agit de réaffirmer l'obligation pour les Etats de prévenir les crimes perpétrés à l'encontre des journalistes et, quand ces crimes sont commis, d'enquêter, d'appréhender les responsables et de les juger.
Troisièmement, il faut affirmer solennellement notre engagement commun à respecter l'indépendance des journalistes. Et, enfin, quatrièmement, il est demandé au Secrétaire général des Nations unies de se saisir systématiquement de la question de la sécurité des journalistes, professionnels des médias et personnels associés dans le cadre de ses rapports réguliers sur la situation des populations civiles dans les conflits armés.
Il revient, donc, Mesdames, Messieurs, aujourd'hui, au Conseil de sécurité, qui jouit d'une autorité politique considérable, de se mobiliser sur ce sujet central. Il l'a déjà fait, à plusieurs reprises, sur la protection des populations civiles dans les conflits, des enfants et du personnel humanitaire. Il est important aujourd'hui qu'il le fasse pour les journalistes. Si nous obtenons cette résolution, ce serait un pas en avant considérable. Son objectif doit être de prendre en compte, autant que possible, les nouvelles contraintes de votre métier.
Permettez-moi, pour terminer, de saisir cette occasion pour dire ma reconnaissance et mon estime à Robert Ménard, qui est depuis longtemps le militant actif que l'on connaît. Permettez-moi également de saluer le travail de "Reporters sans Frontières" qui ne cesse de dénoncer les menaces qui pèsent sur l'exercice de votre métier. Je voudrais aussi saluer d'autres acteurs, comme la Fédération internationale des journalistes, et remercier les personnalités de la presse qui ont accepté de s'associer à cette manifestation. Je voudrais vous remercier tous ici de votre mobilisation, je crois qu'il y a un engagement continu, quels que soient les gouvernements, pour l'indépendance et la liberté de la presse. C'est notre responsabilité et cette action est inscrite dans nos valeurs démocratiques.
Permettez-moi, enfin, d'avoir une pensée particulière pour les familles des journalistes qui ont été blessés ou qui ont souffert de leur disparition, et - je l'ai découvert lorsque je suis arrivé au ministère des Affaires étrangères -, pour ces femmes et ces hommes, que personne ne connaît, mais qui oeuvrent, dans l'ombre, pour retrouver les disparus, qu'ils soit journalistes ou pas. Je le dis parce qu'ils travaillent dans mes services. Personne ne parle jamais d'eux et ils ne veulent d'ailleurs surtout pas être connus. Cela fait partie du service public. Je suis très admiratif de ces gens qui ne disent rien et qui font leur travail, souvent au péril de leur vie, je le rappelle aussi. Merci Robert. (...)
Question. Vous avez parlé tout à l'heure de Anna Politkovskaia, qui a été assassinée il y a deux mois. Vous n'avez pas parlé de tous les journalistes qui ont été assassinés avant et dont les crimes n'ont jamais été élucidés, et vous savez parfaitement que celui d'Anna ne le sera pas non plus. Ce qui n'empêchera pas, là aussi, de voter la résolution au Conseil de sécurité. En quoi pensez-vous qu'une résolution au Conseil de sécurité puisse plus influer sur certains Etats qui n'ont aucun intérêt à ce qu'on élucide l'assassinat de certains de leurs journalistes ?
Douste-Blazy. (...) C'est là toute la question de l'efficacité du multilatéralisme et du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies que vous me posez.
Je ne partage pas votre pessimisme. Je pense que si un des pays que vous avez cités votait la résolution au Conseil de sécurité, cela aurait véritablement un sens très fort. Vous allez me dire : "mais entre cela et la réalité, il y a beaucoup", peut-être mais je pense que c'est le début de quelque chose, et c'est la raison pour laquelle on le fait. C'est tout l'enjeu de ce métier qu'est la diplomatie qui est d'essayer de progresser, d'entraîner.
Il nous arrive, au Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies, de ne pas être unis. D'ailleurs, quelqu'un a fait remarquer tout à l'heure que mon optimisme était peut-être en effet béat. Pourquoi pas ? Je ne sais pas. J'espère qu'il y aura unanimité. Voter cette résolution, cela veut dire quelque chose. Maintenant, il est évident que, lorsque l'on regarde par exemple la Commission des Droits de l'Homme des Nations unies, on peut se dire qu'il y a des avancées et qu'il y a aussi des incohérences, c'est vrai, je le reconnais.
Je travaille actuellement sur la question des enfants soldats, et je vous invite à venir à la Journée mondiale que je vais organiser au Quai d'Orsay sur ce thème, après un long combat. Je sais qu'il y a certains pays qui laissent faire ces pratiques et qui ne sont pourtant pas condamnés par l'ONU ; eh bien, j'en parlerai. Je sais tout cela, mais faut-il pour autant tout remettre en cause ? Je ne le crois pas.
Vous avez raison de dire que cela ne va pas régler le problème tout de suite mais je pense que c'est une étape. Je suis conscient de nos insuffisances. (...)
**25.08.2006. Conflit au Liban. Réponse de la Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits (www.ihffc.org) à la lettre du secrétaire général de Reporters sans frontières Robert Menard (voir la lettre de M. Menard ci-dessous)
Commission internationale humanitaire d’établissement des faits
Paris le 16 août 2006
Monsieur le Secrétaire général,
« Je vous remercie pour votre courrier du 1er août dernier dans lequel vous demandez à la Commission de prendre l’initiative de solliciter les parties au conflit, soit Israël et le Liban, afin qu’elles autorisent la Commission à enquêter sur les allégations de violations du Droit international humanitaire commises sur leur territoire.
« Nous sommes en effe ttrès concernés par les faits que vous rapportez dans votre lettre. Les attaques délibérées, contre des journalistes et des infrastructures appartenant ou utilisées par la presse, constituent une violation grave du droit international humanitaire. Les journalistes ont le droit d’exercer leur mission dans les territoires soumis aux faits de guerre.
« Puisque vous faites référence au Préambule de notre règlement intérieur, je me permets de vous rappeler que la Commission existe en vertu de l’article 90 du Premier Protocole additionnel aux Conventions de Genève qui lui confère le cadre légal dans lequel elle a le droit d’agir. En principe, ce sont donc les Etats parties au Protocole 1, et qui ont préalablement déclaré reconnaître la Commission , qui sont en droit de faire appel aux services de la Commission. Cette dernière ne pourra toutefois exécuter son mandat que s’il est accepté par toutes les parties au conflit.
« Consciente de son rôle, de gardienne en quelque sorte, du respect du droit international humanitaire, la Commission a, ces dernières années, à diverses reprises, pris l’initiative d’offrir ses services à certains Etats. Mais cette procédure ne bénéficie d’aucun automatisme. Dans notre expérience, ces démarches sont difficiles, et difficilement acceptées.
« Je peux cependant vous dire que, non seulement votre confiance nous honore et nous encourage, mais que nous sommes déjà très impliqués dans la recherche des moyens qui pourraient nous permettre d’aider au retour, le plus rapidement possible, à un meilleur respect des règles du DIH dans le conflit qui oppose Israël et le Liban.
« La Commission est persuadée que l’établissement objectif des faits allégués par les Etats comme étant des violations du DIH est essentiel : c’est la clé indispensable pour que les mesures nécessaires soient prises afin qu’ils ne se reproduisent plus.
« En vous remerciant à nouveau d’avoir pris l’initiative de faire appel à la Commission pour aider à l’amélioration du sort des personnels de presse dans l’exercice de leur mission, je vous prie d’agréer, Monsieur le Secrétaire général, l’expression de mes salutations les meilleures.
Ghalib Djilali Président de la Commission
**2.08.2006. Liban. Pour information, lettre du secrétaire général de Reporters sans frontières au Pr. Ghalil Djilali, Président Commission internationale humanitaire d'établissement des faits, Palais fédéral Ouest CH-3003 Berne (Suisse)
Paris, le 1er août 2006
Monsieur le Président,
Reporters sans frontières, organisation internationale de défense de la liberté de la presse, souhaite attirer votre attention sur plusieurs attaques perpétrées par larmée de lEtat dIsraël contre des médias et des journalistes libanais, dans le cadre de lopération militaire déclenchée le 12 juillet 2006.
Le 22 juillet, laviation israélienne a détruit une antenne de télécommunications à Fatka, une localité située à lest de Beyrouth, interrompant notamment les émissions de la chaîne de télévision privée Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation (LBC). Lors de cette attaque, un technicien de la chaîne, Sleimane Chidiac, a été tué. Deux autres employés ont été blessés. Le même jour, laviation israélienne a bombardé une installation de télécommunications à Terbol, une localité du nord du Liban, interrompant la diffusion dans plusieurs régions du pays de la LBC, ainsi que des chaînes de télévision privées Futur TV et Al-Manar.
Le 13 juillet, trois employés de la chaîne de télévision du Hezbollah, Al-Manar, ont été légèrement blessés dans la destruction, par laviation israélienne, du siège de leur média, à Dahyieh, la banlieue sud de Beyrouth.
Le 28 juillet, l'armée israélienne a tiré au mortier sur un convoi d'une cinquantaine de véhicules de presse dûment identifiés, près de Rmaish, un village chrétien du sud du Liban. Deux collaborateurs des médias jordaniens, notamment le caméraman Mhamad Nagawoui, travaillant pour la chaîne de télévision allemande N24, ont été blessés lors de l'attaque. Le 12 juillet, un hélicoptère de larmée israélienne avait déjà tiré sur le véhicule transportant Bassel Al-Aridi, Abd Khayyat et Ziad Sarwan, respectivement reporter, cameraman et assistant cameraman de la chaîne de télévision privée New TV. Les trois journalistes ont été blessés et ont dû être hospitalisés. La direction de New TV insiste sur le fait que le véhicule dans lequel les journalistes se trouvaient était clairement marqué du logo de la chaîne.
La destruction des antennes de télécommunications de Fatka et Terbol avait pour objectif de priver la population de plusieurs sources dinformation, ainsi que de perturber les communications téléphoniques sur le territoire libanais. Or, la Convention de Genève considère les équipements et les installations des médias comme des biens de caractère civil, bénéficiant de la protection inhérente à ce statut, à moins que soit établie leur utilisation à des fins militaires. Tel nest assurément pas le cas pour la LBC et Futur-TV.
LEtat dIsraël estime toutefois que la chaîne Al-Manar, appartenant au Hezbollah, dont la neutralisation est lun de ses buts de guerre, constitue une cible militaire légitime dans la mesure où elle relaie la propagande de lun des belligérants, justifiant ainsi les attaques contre ses installations. Or, le droit international humanitaire admet que la propagande est inhérente à tout conflit et a pour but de soutenir le moral de la population, lequel ne saurait être considéré comme un objectif militaire. Les médias de propagande ne remplissent en aucun cas les critères de la « contribution effective à laction militaire » et de « lavantage militaire précis » requis par larticle 52 § 2 du Protocole I additionnel aux Conventions de Genève de 1949.
Enfin, les professionnels de linformation bénéficient du même statut que les personnes civiles et doivent être protégés, en tant que telle, par le droit international humanitaire. Or, il existe des éléments sérieux tendant à penser que laviation israélienne a tiré sur le véhicule de New TV sans considération pour son marquage explicite en tant que voiture de presse.
Lattaque meurtrière du 22 juillet, ainsi que les tirs des 13 et 12 juillet, constituent en conséquence des violations du droit international humanitaire.
Les objectifs visés, les ordres donnés et les conséquences précises de ces opérations militaires doivent être établis dans le cadre dune enquête rigoureuse et impartiale. Une telle enquête est du ressort de la Commission internationale détablissement des faits fondée par larticle 90 du Protocole I additionnel aux Conventions de Genève de 1949, et dont la fonction essentielle est denquêter sur toute prétendue violation ou infraction grave au droit international humanitaire.
Reporters sans frontières a aujourdhui lhonneur de vous saisir, afin que vous mettiez en uvre votre devoir dinitiative, conformément au Règlement intérieur de la Commission. Dans son préambule, celui-ci fonde en effet son existence sur la conviction « de la nécessité de prendre, le cas échéant en coopération avec dautres organismes internationaux, en particulier lOrganisation des Nations unies, toutes les initiatives appropriées afin de sacquitter de ses fonctions dans lintérêt des victimes des conflits armés ».
Ce devoir dinitiative vous donne par conséquent la possibilité de solliciter lEtat dIsraël et la République libanaise pour quils vous transmettent leur consentement à voir la Commission diligenter une enquête sur les violations du droit international humanitaire exposées ci-dessus.
Outre quelle serait un instrument de lutte inédite contre limpunité et la désinformation, cette initiative permettrait également à la Commission de rappeler que, par larticle 1er commun des Conventions de Genève, les Etats contractants se sont « engagés à respecter et à faire respecter la présente Convention en toutes circonstances ».
Dans lattente dune réaction positive à notre requête, je vous prie dagréer, Monsieur le Président, lexpression de ma haute considération.
Robert Ménard, secrétaire général
***28.07.2006. UNESCO CHIEF URGES ALL SIDES IN LEBANON CONFLICT TO RESPECT JOURNALISTS AFTER TWO KILLED
New York, Jul 28 2006 -Deploring the deaths of two media workers covering the worsening conflict in Lebanon, the head of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) today called on both Israel and Hezbollah to respect the civilian status of journalists and media organizations.
In times of violent conflict it is essential for all parties to respect the important role the media play in enabling the public to make informed choices and working towards peace and democracy, said UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro Matsuura.
Belligerents can not regard media staff and media outlets as military targets. And in times of extreme hardship for the region, with hundreds of civilian deaths, the courage of journalists attempting to keep us informed of events deserves recognition.
Suleiman al-Chidiac, the head of a Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation transmission facility at Fatqa, northeast of Beirut, is reported to have been killed on 22 July during Israeli air attacks, UNESCO said in a press release.
Layal Nagib, a freelance photographer for the Lebanese magazine Al-Jaras and Agence France-Presse, is reported to have been killed on 23 July. She was in a taxi on her way to meet a convoy of villagers fleeing Israeli bombardments in south Lebanon when she was hit by shrapnel.
UNESCO is the only UN agency with a mandate to defend freedom of expression and press freedom.
**Résolution et recommandation adoptées par le Conseil de l'Europe en mai 2005 (English text after French).
La liberté de la presse et les conditions de travail des journalistes dans les zones de conflits
Résolution 1438 (2005)[1]
1. L'Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe rappelle limportance de la liberté dexpression et dinformation dans les médias pour les sociétés démocratiques et pour toute personne. Cette liberté constitue une valeur fondamentale garantie partout en Europe par la Convention européenne des Droits de l'Homme. Une situation de guerre ou de conflit ne supprime pas la nécessité de la diffusion dinformations adéquates par les médias ; bien au contraire, elle la rend plus impérieuse encore.
2. Les journalistes en reportage dans des zones à risque, telles que des zones de guerre ou de conflit ou des zones de non-droit, font souvent face à des conditions de travail difficiles et dangereuses et sont même parfois largement et systématiquement pris pour cibles par des groupes terroristes cherchant à attirer lattention des médias, comme actuellement en Irak. Dans certaines circonstances, il convient donc de mettre en balance, dune part, la liberté dexpression et dinformation et, dautre part, dautres considérations fondamentales, notamment les droits à la vie, à la liberté et à la sécurité, pour les journalistes. Il ne faut pas transiger sur la protection de ces droits sous prétexte que la loi du marché exigerait des reportages en direct des zones à risque et que le public serait de plus en plus avide de reportages à sensation.
3. L'Assemblée déplore la multiplication des assassinats, enlèvements et disparitions de journalistes travaillant dans des zones de conflit ou sur des sujets sensibles, et considère ceci comme des atteintes particulièrement graves à la liberté dexpression et dinformation dans les médias. Un grand retentissement donné aux enlèvements de journalistes et lacceptation des demandes des ravisseurs, tel que le versement de sommes importantes augmentent considérablement les risques auxquels sont soumis les reporters travaillant dans des zones dangereuses et limitent ainsi la possibilité, pour le public, dêtre informé valablement.
4. Préoccupée par la situation de la liberté dexpression et dinformation dans les médias en Irak, lAssemblée déplore le grand nombre de décès et de disparitions de journalistes survenus dans ce pays, et le maintien en détention de Florence Aubenas, Hussein Hanoun al-Saadi, Sorin Dumitru Miscoci,Marie-Jeanne Ion et Eduard Ovidiu Ohanesian. Elle demande la libération immédiate des otages.
5. L'Assemblée rend hommage aux organisations non gouvernementales comme l « International News Safety Institute », l « International Press Institute », Reporters sans frontières, la Fédération internationale des journalistes, Article 19 et l « Institute for War & Peace Reporting », qui apportent une aide et des conseils aux journalistes travaillant dans des situations dangereuses et des zones de conflit.
6. Se félicitant de lélaboration, à linitiative de Reporters sans frontières, de la Charte sur la sécurité des journalistes en zones de conflit ou de tension, lAssemblée rappelle limportance de nenvoyer dans ces régions que des journalistes expérimentés et bien préparés, qui partent de leur plein gré, de leur fournir le matériel de sécurité, de communication et de premiers secours dont ils ont besoin, de leur apporter une aide psychologique à leur retour, et de les faire bénéficier dune assurance couvrant les cas de maladie, de blessure, de rapatriement, dinvalidité et de décès.
7. LAssemblée rappelle et réaffirme que les journalistes doivent être considérés comme des civils en vertu de larticle 79 du premier protocole additionnel aux Conventions de Genève de 1949, à condition quils n'entreprennent aucune action qui porte atteinte à leur statut de personnes civiles et sans préjudice du droit, pour les correspondants de guerre accrédités auprès des forces armées, de bénéficier du statut prévu par l'article 4 A.4 de la Troisième Convention de Genève, une fois tombés au pouvoir de lennemi.
8. Rappelant la Déclaration du Comité des Ministres et sa Recommandation N° R(96) 4 sur la protection des journalistes en situation de conflit et de tension, lAssemblée invite tous les Etats membres et observateurs à se conformer pleinement à ces dispositions et notamment à :
i. respecter le droit à la liberté dexpression et dinformation;
ii. ne pas restreindre lutilisation des dispositifs de communication, tels que les téléphones fixes ou mobiles, les téléphones satellites et les appareils de radiocommunication ;
iii. donner des instructions à leurs forces armées et à leurs forces de police pour quelles apportent une assistance et une protection aux journalistes ;
iv. faciliter laccès des journalistes au territoire de leur destination en leur délivrant les visas et les autres documents de voyage nécessaires ;
v. respecter la confidentialité des sources utilisées par les journalistes.
9. Tous les Etats membres et observateurs du Conseil de lEurope sont appelés :
i. à faire en sorte que les journalistes puissent travailler en toute sécurité sur leur territoire ;
ii. à enquêter sur tous les actes de violence ou les incidents mortels à lencontre de journalistes survenus sur leur territoire, ainsi qu à létranger lorsque leurs forces armées ou de sécurité peuvent y avoir été impliquées, y compris en cas dincidents dus à des tirs amis.
10. En outre, lAssemblée appelle les Etats membres et observateurs du Conseil de lEurope à mettre en place des programmes obligatoires de formation et dinformation pour les correspondants de guerre intégrés au sein des forces armées, ces programmes devant se dérouler avant le départ.
11. Les médias devraient indiquer clairement au public quels reportages ont été réalisés par des correspondants de guerre intégrés au sein de forces armées ou de sécurité.
12. LAssemblée souligne que si, pour leur propre sécurité, les journalistes qui sont intégrés au sein de forces armées ou de sécurité ne peuvent travailler que dans certaines zones, les restrictions à leurs reportages doivent être limitées au strict minimum requis pour éviter la divulgation dinformations confidentielles susceptibles de compromettre les opérations militaires en cours.
13. Les employeurs et les organisations professionnelles de journalistes devraient organiser des cours pour préparer les journalistes aux risques des zones de conflits. Les medias devraient déclarer publiquement quaucune rançon ne sera versée aux ravisseurs et quaucune concession politique ne leur sera accordée et que les déclarations politiques de journalistes pris en otage sont faites sous la contrainte et nont donc aucune valeur.
14. Tous les journalistes et leurs employeurs sont encouragés à adhérer à la Charte sur la sécurité des journalistes en zones de conflit ou de tension élaborée par Reporters sans frontières.
15. Se référant à la Déclaration du Comité des Ministres sur la protection des journalistes en situation de conflit et de tension, lAssemblée demande au Secrétaire Général du Conseil de l'Europe daccorder une attention particulière au sort des journalistes en situation de conflit et de tension, et à suivre régulièrement les cas des journalistes disparus, détenus, blessés ou tués dans lexercice de leur profession dans des Etats membres et observateurs ou dans le cadre dopérations militaires ou de maintien de la paix menées à létranger par des Etats membres et observateurs du Conseil de lEurope.
[1] Discussion par lAssemblée le 28 avril 2005 (14e séance) (voir Doc. 10521, rapport de la commission de la culture, de la science et de l'éducation, rapporteur : M. Jarab,). Texte adopté par lAssemblée le 28 avril 2005 (14e séance).
La liberté de la presse et les conditions de travail des journalistes dans les zones de conflits
Recommandation 1702 (2005)[1]
1. LAssemblée parlementaire du Conseil de lEurope, renvoyant à sa Résolution 1438 (2005) sur la liberté de la presse et les conditions de travail des journalistes dans les zones de conflit, recommande au Comité des Ministres de :
i. transmettre la résolution aux ministres compétents ;
ii. veiller au respect de la liberté dexpression et dinformation dans les médias et aux conditions de travail des journalistes en cas de conflit dans les Etats membres ;
iii. travailler sur cette question avec les Nations Unies, et en particulier à collaborer avec sa Commission des droits de lhomme ou avec lUnesco, tout en préservant la conformité des normes européennes en la matière avec la Convention européenne des Droits de lHomme et les autres textes juridiques applicables du Conseil de lEurope.
[1] Discussion par lAssemblée le 28 avril 2005 (14e séance) (voir Doc. 10521, rapport de la commission de la culture, de la science et de l'éducation, rapporteur : M. Jarab,). Texte adopté par lAssemblée le 28 avril 2005 (14e séance).
ENGLISH VERSION
Freedom of the press and the working conditions of journalists in conflict zones
Resolution 1438 (2005)[1]
1. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe recalls the importance of freedom of expression and information in the media for democratic society and for each individual. It constitutes a core value guaranteed throughout Europe by the European Convention on Human Rights. The situation of war or conflict does not remove the importance of adequate provision of information through the media; rather to the contrary, it enhances its relevance.
2. Journalists reporting from risk areas, such as war zones, conflict areas or lawless areas, are often faced with difficult and dangerous working conditions and sometimes even with widespread and systematic targeting by terrorist groups in search of media attention, as is the case at present in Iraq. Freedom of expression and information may, depending on the individual circumstances, thus be balanced with other fundamental considerations, in particular the rights to life, liberty and security of journalists. These other rights must not be compromised by growing market pressures for more direct reports from risk areas and a dubious growth of public desire for sensational reporting.
3. The Assembly deplores the great number of murders, kidnappings and disappearances of journalists working in conflict areas or on dangerous subjects and regards these as most serious acts of aggression against freedom of expression and information in the media. Wide publicity and fulfilment of the demands of terrorists such as the payment of large sums to kidnappers increase considerably the risk for journalists working in dangerous areas and thus reduce the possibility for the public to receive valuable information.
4. Concerned about freedom of expression and information in the media in Iraq, the Assembly deplores the numerous deaths and disappearances of journalists there and the continued kidnapping of Florence Aubenas, Hussein Hanoun al-Saadi, Sorin Dumitru Miscoci,Marie-Jeanne Ion and Eduard Ovidiu Ohanesian. The Assembly calls for the immediate release of those held hostage.
5. The Assembly pays tribute to non-governmental organisations such as the International News Safety Institute, the International Press Institute, Reporters without Borders, the International Federation of Journalists, Article 19 and the Institute for War & Peace Reporting for providing help and advice to journalists working in dangerous situations and conflict areas.
6. Welcoming the Charter for the Safety of Journalists Working in War Zones or Dangerous Areas by the organisation Reporters without Borders, the Assembly recalls the importance of employing only experienced and well trained journalists, who volunteer to take up such tasks, and providing them with adequate safety, communication and first-aid equipment, psychological counselling after their return as well as with insurance for illness, injury, repatriation, disability and loss of life.
7. The Assembly recalls and reaffirms that journalists must be considered civilians under Article 79 of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, provided that they take no action adversely affecting their status as civilians, and without prejudice to the right of war correspondents, who are accredited to the armed forces and accompany them without actually being members thereof, to the status of prisoner of war under Article 4 (A) (4) of the Third Geneva Convention once fallen into the power of the enemy.
8. Recalling the Committee of Ministers Declaration and Recommendation No. R(96) 4 on the protection of journalists in situations of conflict and tension, the Assembly calls on all member and observer states to comply fully with them, in particular to:
i. respect the right to freedom of expression and information;
ii. not restrict the use of communication equipment, such as fixed and mobile telephones, satellite telephones and radio communication devices;
iii. instruct their military and police forces to give protection and assistance to journalists;
iv. facilitate access to the territory of destination by issuing necessary visas and other travel documents;
v. respect the confidentiality of journalists sources.
9. All Council of Europe member and observer states are called upon:
i. to ensure that journalists can work safely in their territories;
ii. to investigate all acts of violence or deadly incidents against journalists which occur in their territories as well as those occurring abroad in which armed or security forces may have been involved, including those due to friendly fire.
10. Besides, the Assembly calls on Council of Europe member and observer states to set up compulsory training and information programmes for war correspondents embedded in military forces, to be provided prior to departure.
11. Media should indicate clearly to the public which reports are from war correspondents embedded in military or security forces.
12. The Assembly stresses that, if, for reasons of their own personal safety, journalists that are embedded in the military or security forces may only work in certain areas, restrictions on their reporting must be limited to the absolute minimum required to prevent the disclosure of confidential information endangering ongoing military operations.
13. Journalists employers and professional organisations should organise training courses to prepare journalists for the risks of working in conflict areas. The media should declare publicly that no financial payments or political concessions should be made to kidnappers and that political statements made by kidnapped journalists are made under coercion and are hence without any value.
14. All journalists and their employers are encouraged to adhere to the Charter for the Safety of Journalists Working in War Zones or Dangerous Areas by the organisation Reporters without Borders.
15. With reference to the Committee of Ministers Declaration on the protection of journalists in situations of conflict and tension, the Assembly asks the Secretary General of the Council of Europe to pay particular regard to the fate of journalists in situations of conflict and tension and regularly follow cases of journalists missing, being detained or having been wounded or killed in the exercise of their profession, in member and observer states or in connection with military or peace-keeping operations conducted by Council of Europe member and observer states abroad.
[1] Assembly debate on 28 April 2005 (14th Sitting) (see Doc. 10521, report of the Committee on Culture, Science and Education, rapporteur: Mr Jarab). Text adopted by the Assembly on 28 April 2005 (14th Sitting).
Freedom of the press and the working conditions of journalists in conflict zones
Recommendation 1702 (2005)[1]
1. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, referring to its Resolution 1438 (2005) on freedom of the press and the working conditions of journalists in conflict zones, recommends that the Committee of Ministers:
i. forward this Resolution to the competent ministers;
ii. monitor respect of freedom of expression and information in the media and the working conditions of journalists in situations of conflict in member states;
iii. work on this issue at the level of the United Nations, in particular with the United Nations Commission on Human Rights or UNESCO, while maintaining the standards of the European approach towards this issue in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights and other relevant legal texts of the Council of Europe.
[1] Assembly debate on 28 April 2005 (14th Sitting) (see Doc. 10521, report of the Committee on Culture, Science and Education, rapporteur: Mr Jarab). Text adopted by the Assembly on 28 April 2005 (14th Sitting).
***Décembre 2004 Article publié dans la Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge n0 853, pages 37-68 par Alexandre Balguy-Gallois (chargé d'enseignement à l'Université Paris 1) Protection des journalistes et des medias en période de conflit armé. Résumé (source: CICR) Le récent conflit en Irak illustre parfaitement la tendance générale à l’augmentation des risques du métier de journaliste dans les zones de conflit armé. Il est donc utile de rappeler que les attaques contre les journalistes et les équipements des médias sont illicites, parce que ceux-ci jouissent de la protection accordée par le droit international humanitaire, respectivement, aux personnes et biens civils, sauf s’ils apportent une contribution effective à l’action militaire. Les médias ne peuvent être considérés comme des cibles légitimes, même lorsqu’ils sont employés à des fins de propagande, à la condition toutefois qu’ils ne soient pas détournés pour inciter à commettre des violations graves du droit humanitaire. Sans que cela leur soit spécifique, les journalistes et les médias se voient accorder en outre le bénéfice de certaines mesures de précaution comme le principe de proportionnalité ou l’obligation d’avertissement. Il semble toutefois nécessaire aujourd’hui d’envisager l’adoption d’un nouvel instrument, d’une part pour réaffirmer le droit humanitaire applicable aux journalistes et aux médias et rétablir ainsi dans leur autorité certaines normes fondamentales souvent malmenées, et d’autre part pour améliorer le droit existant et répondre aux exigences de notre époque comme, par exemple, le phénomène des journalistes « embedded » (pour l'article complet voir le site du CICR: www.icrc.org).
***Résolution sur la liberté de la presse adoptée le 27 novembre 2004 par les chefs d'Etat et de gouvernement des 51 Etats membres de l'Organisation internationale de la francophonie (OIF) lors du Xe sommet de la Francophonie à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)
Les Chefs d'État et de gouvernement des pays ayant le français en partage, réunis à Ouagadougou les 26 et 27 novembre 2004,
Préoccupés par la multiplication des agressions et des violences meurtrières perpétrées à l'encontre des journalistes dans l'exercice de leurs fonctions ;
Inquiets des atteintes à la liberté d'expression de la presse dans un nombre croissant de pays dans le monde ;
Désireux de marquer leur solidarité avec les professionnels de la presse victimes de ces violences ;
Soulignent les dispositions de la Déclaration de Bamako, par lesquelles ils se sont engagés à veiller au respect effectif de la liberté de la presse ;
Tiennent à marquer leur soutien au projet d'un nouvel instrument international destiné à renforcer les dispositions en vigueur sur la protection de journalistes, notamment dans les zones de conflits armés, et des outils nécessaires à l'accomplissement de leur mission ;
Appellent de façon pressante à la libération sans délai des journalistes actuellement détenus.